Is The Italian Elephant About To Break Loose Again?
Market nervousness about Italy has been growing in recent weeks, with the Moody’s credit downgrade of the country being only one of the reasons. A bailout is clearly in the offing, with the only real questions being how and when. While the situation inside his country appears to be deteriorating, Mario Monti has been doing the rounds of European capitals in an attempt to drum up support. While in Helsinki he raised an eyebrow or two when he warned that without a serious plan to bring down interest rates disaffection with the euro in his country could easily grow to dangerous proportions. Crying wolf, or a piece of insider information? Probably a bit of both.
Italy is in a deepening recession which has now lasted for over a year. Monti himself has ruled out the possibility that he could continue in office after next spring’s general elections, while at the same time Silvio Berlusconi is constantly hinting that he would not be averse to accepting prime ministerial office again, should his country need him. All of which makes me ask myself just over a year after my “Is Italy, Not Spain, the Real Elephant in the Euro Room?” post, whether in fact the currently chained beast is not about to break its tethers and go for a crockery breaking rumble round the Euro living room.
What follows is a summary of a revised version of a presentation I gave in Cortona last autumn. I have put the presentation online here.
Low Growth And High Debt, A Highly Combustible Cocktail
Just as I highlighted in the case of Portugal in my recent post, Italy’s problem is long term growth. This is not a passing phenomenon, but one which has been getting steadily worse over decades. Italy has lost growth at a pace of about one percent a year over the last four decades. If the pattern continues Italy GDP will drop over this decade and continue to do so for as far ahead as the eye can see.
To give us an idea of what this means, Italian GDP at the end of June was at the same level it first reached in the second quarter of 2003. If the current recession continues as forecast by the Italian government during this year, by December we will be below the GDP level of December 2000, which is another way of saying that it will be below the level first attained some 12 years earlier. If the recession is slightly deeper that the current government forecast, and continues throughout 2013 (certainly not an excluded scenario) we might even arrive at levels first seen in the late 1990s. In the meantime the country’s population will have risen from 57 million to 61 million, hence GDP per capita will have fallen substantially. This is not a situation either to be taken lightly, or one which it will be easy to turn around.
There are a variety of reasons for this sharp drop in growth momentum. Some of the reasons are undoubtedly, as I will argue demographic. Others are associated with the loss of international competitiveness experienced by the Italian economy since entering the European monetary union.
Once clear indication of the extent to which the deteriorating growth outlook is associated with competitiveness loss is to be seen in the correlation between worsening growth performance and the deteriorating current account balance.
Double Dip Recession
Italy first fell into recession at the end of 2007 – some months before the other Euro Area countries – and didn’t come out of it again till the start of 2010 , so the economy contracted for two full years. GDP fell by 1.2% in 2008, and by 5.5% in 2009.
After an 18 month recovery, the economy again fell into a second “double dip” recession around the middle of 2011, after a surge in borrowing costs forced the government to apply stringent austerity cuts in an attempt to recover investor confidence.
In the three months up to June GDP contracted for a fourth straight quarter, falling by 0.7 percent over the previous quarter. We don’t have the detailed breakdown from the statistics office yet, but it seems clear the contraction was again led by sharp falls in consumption and investment as concerns about the fiscal outlook and the euro area crisis depressed confidence and tightened credit conditions.
It is quite possible that Italy will experience a deeper recession this year and next than most forecasters predict (IMF current 2012 -1.9%), reflecting headwinds from the sovereign debt crisis compounded by Italy’s large planned fiscal adjustment. The government will likely miss its deficit targets and even in the absence of any major shocks to yields, the country’s debt to GDP ratio is surely going to increase significantly over the next few years.
Part of the problem is that Italy’s fiscal spending has assumed the importance it has in the country’s economy due to the loss of international competitiveness. Reducing the government contribution to GDP in this context only makes the economy fold in on itself. More urgent competitiveness raising issues are needed, ones which will bring quicker results than the ongoing programme of long term structural reforms.
So Just What Do We Mean By International Competitiveness?
The issue of international competitiveness is the one which has perhaps caused most theoretical controversy during the current Euro Area crisis, with one side arguing vehemently that some sort of devaluation is essential, while the other argues equally vehemently that it isn’t. In the following slides I propose a slightly new definition of international competitiveness, which is to do with having an export sector which is appropriately large given the median population age of the country concerned.
You can enlarge the slides for easier reading by clicking on them, or alternately you can view them via my slideshare version.
• Median population age is an important economic indicator
• Populations with high median ages tend to be export dependent
• Export dependency gives a better, more precise measure of international competitiveness.
• An export dependent country is internationally competitive when it has a large enough export sector to drive economic growth.
Italy and The Eurozone Debt Crisis
Total Italian debt is not excessive in comparison with some other countries in the Eurozone, but public debt is the second highest.
Despite having normally run positive primary balances
Italy has run general budget deficits since the 1980s
The problem here is the weight of the debt, the burden of interest payments
Italy Is Now Poised On A Knife Edge
Italian gross government debt to GDP is currently perched just under 123% of GDP. The key factors which will influence the future trajectory are GDP growth, inflation and interest rates. With GDP falling, inflation low and interest rates rising the outlook seems quite problematic.
Hence The Problem Of Market Pressure, and concerns about interest rates. Italy is currently paying around 6% for 10 year debt issues, and the average maturity of Italy’s debt is 6.7 years, the lowest level since 2005.
The IMF currently predicts that Gross Government Debt To GDP will peak at 124% in 2013. Any significant slippage on this and debt restructuring becomes inevitable. Investors are worried with good reason. Market responses are not just simple speculation. ECB support is critical, but so are radical measures to increase the growth rate.
Too Big To Rescue?
As stated above, Italy shrank further into recession in the second quarter with a 2.5 per cent annual decline. The 0.7 per cent quarterly fall in gross domestic product, only slightly better than the first quarter’s 0.8 per cent decline, means the economy has now been contracting for over a year, and there is at least another year of the same or worse to come as spending cuts steadily bite and the Euro debt crisis rocks its way forward. The recession will weaken tax revenues and hit jobs and consumer spending, a vicious circle which makes it harder for Mario Monti, who is aiming to cut the budget deficit to 0.1 per cent of GDP in 2014, to meet his public finance goals.
Consumer Confidence and PMI indicators suggest that the Italian government’s GDP growth estimates (of a contraction of 1.2% for 2012 and an expansion of 0.5% for 2013) are way too optimistic . The consumer confidence reading was only just up in July from June’s 14 year low, and for the first time since the launch of the PMI services survey in January 1998 firms generally expected output to be lower in a year’s time than current levels.
The employers group Confindustria now forecast a contraction in GDP of 2.4% in 2012. A further fall of 2.0% is not unlikely in 2013 as the European debt crisis worsens. Compared to the other forecasters I would be more negative on the outlook for both private consumption and investment activity. In addition, with a more negative outlook for the euro area economy – destination for 43% of Italian exports — these are unlikely to put in an unexpected stellar performance in 2013.
Unemployment Rising Sharply
Italy’s unemployment rate hit a record 10.8 percent in June, up from 10.6 percent in May. There were 2.79 million people looking for work in June, according to seasonally adjusted figures — a rise of 37.5 percent compared to a year earlier. Youth unemployment dropped from 35.3 percent in May to 34.3 percent. These are not yet anything like Spanish numbers, but they are not to be sneezed at either.
The number of people living in absolute poverty in Italy rose to 3.4 million in 2011, or 5.7 percent of the population, up from 5.2 percent in 2010.Those living in relative poverty for Italian standards were roughly stable at 8.2 million, or 13.6 percent. But among families with no workers and no pensioners, the relative poverty rate rose to 51 percent from 40 percent.
Fiscal Targets Look Increasingly Out Of Reach
The implementation of austerity measures in Italy is likely to have a substantial negative impact on the economy in the coming years. Given its lack of competitiveness, the economy lived off constant demand stimulus from the government. Without this the growth problem is likely to become worse.
There have now been five fiscal packages introduced by Italian governments since July 2011, with the objective of a cumulative fiscal consolidation of some 5.2% of annual GDP (€85.8bn) between 2011 and 2014. With the majority of the measures concentrated in 2012, there will inevitably be a large negative impact on the economy throughout this year.
Given the deep recession the country will be in over the next couple of years and poor potential growth prospects over the medium- and longer-term, Italy’s public sector balance sheet problems are likely to mount. Although the 2011 fiscal deficit of 3.9% was not particularly high in comparison with many Euro Area countries the governments projection of a close-to-balanced budget in 2014 looks hugely optimistic. A more realistic expectation would be for the deficit to be under the EU 3% level at that stage, but the danger is this could well mean gross debt to GDP will be over 130%. Above the danger mark.
The ECB’s role in the crisis both helps and doesn’t help, depending on how you look at it. They have been very tardy in acting, and normally when they have done so it is been via half measures which have not got to the heart of the problem. The LTROs are a good example. Italian banks have borrowed more than 283 billion euros from the ECB via the 3 year LTROs and other liquidity operations, but this liquidity is by and large used to either purchase government bonds or buy up their own expiring debt. Buying government bonds is attractive since they pay yields which are far above the ECB lending rates. This difference – the so called “carry” – helps bank profitability and enables them to recapitalise, but it also means that interest rates charged to small business clients rises as they need to compete with the government for funds. Despite the fact that such practices make the banks more “joined at the hip” than ever with their sovereigns, and that their exposure to losses should the Italian sovereign eventually have to restructure rises, they remain attractive because the risk weighting and hence “capital consumption” of public sector lending under the Basel rules remains absurdly low. This is where the real private sector “crowding
Banks increased their holdings of the country’s bonds by about 78 billion euros in the first six months of 2011. This forms part of the “nationalization” of Europe’s sovereign debt markets. Foreign investors cut their holdings of Italian government securities by 18 percent in March from a year earlier, according to the Bank of Italy. In the same month Italian banks boosted them by 39 percent.
Meanwhile, as we can see in the chart above, the rate of new lending to the private sector has been falling steadily, to both households and corporates. As I say part of the problem is that as the recession deepens the credit risk perception of Italian households and companies deteriorates,as the ECB pointed out in their latest monthly report.
The report immediately produced criticism from the Italian consumers’ association Codacons, who complained that the ECB itself had not found a solution to this situation. “If companies are insolvent it’s because banks are strangling them, denying them credit,” Codacons said. Coldiretti, the Italian agricultural association, also estimates that 60 per cent of companies in the sector risk being starved of credit as they face interest rates that are 30 per cent higher than the average of other sectors.
This problem is more complex than it seems. It is not so much a question of credit being strangled, but of demand being strangled as austerity bites. Companies who cannot sell profitably are a high credit risk. There is demand globally, but as I am saying Italy is insufficiently competitive to take advantage of it. Bottom line, the high cost of financing Italian government bonds is pushing up longer term interest rates, and discouraging investment, and this is an issue the ECB could address, by directly buying commercial paper, for example.
Easing In The Bailout
The possible Italian bailout is fast becoming a tricky political issue. The technocratic government of Mario Monti would like to get an MoU agreed before handing the country back to the politicians.
The request for bond buying would involve ECB secondary market purchases as well as primary market purchases by the EFSF. It would also involve a Memorandum of Understanding which would undoubtedly contain strict conditions and an implementation supervision mechanism. The ECB would surely also have a say in those conditions if bank bond purchases were to form part of the package. Indeed, the ECB has only this week in its August bulletin made clear what it thinks is required. The Bank suggests countries with high unemployment need to “abolish wage indexation, relax job protection and cut minimum wages”. The bank is not impressed with the Italian labour reform, which is too little too late, and thinks direct wage cuts are now the only workable remedy.
Unsurprisingly, many Italian politicians are highly reticent about being seen to hand over their country’s future to an institution with such views, which if implemented would be massively unpopular in the country, so pressure is mounting for Monti not to ask for help. That having been said, the country really has no alternative if it wants to stay in the Euro.
Is Italy Facing A period of Growing Political Instability?
But this is just it, exactly how committed is the Italian political class to staying in the Euro? Certainly it is the one country on Europe’s periphery where you can hear speeches from politicians with serious followings questioning whether there are not alternatives. Indeed Mario Monti warned on just this point during his recent Helsinki visit. “I can assure you that if the (bond yield) spread in Italy remains at these levels for some time then you are going to see a non euro-oriented, non fiscal-discipline-orientated government taking power in Italy,” he said.
He was, of course, referring to the ambivalence of Silvio Berlusconi on the Euro issue, and the outright hostility to the common currency displayed by the rising (5) star of Italian politics, Beppe Grillio. “After me the populists”, as Monti once said.
A lot of these statements can be read as brinksmanship, but as BofA Merrill Lynch foreign exchange strategists David Woo and Athanasios Vamvakidis warned in a July 10 report, investors “may be underpricing the possibility of voluntary exit of one or more countries” from the currency bloc. And these countries may not be the ones most widely talk about, like Greece or Spain. It was Italy, the euro area’s third-largest economy, which they found would enjoy a higher chance of achieving an orderly exit than others and would stand to benefit from improvements in competitiveness, economic growth and balance sheets.
Woo and Vamvakidis employed a variant of game theory and found that while Germany could “bribe” Italy to remain in the bloc and avoid the fallout from an exit, its ability to do so is limited. That’s because Italy has more reasons than Greece to leave so any compensation could become too expensive for Germany and Italians may be even more reluctant than the Greeks to accept the conditions for staying.
Interestingly enough in this connection Nomura’s Jens Nordvig and Nick Firoozye (whose excellent work on Euro break up dynamics unfortunately did not win them the Wolfson Prize) argue in their afterthought essay (Wolfson: What we learned about the future of Europe, Nine specific lessons from the Wolfson Economics Prize competition) that one of the things they learnt from doing the spadework was the following.
“We have constructed a data base of the relevant liabilities for each Eurozone country, and our calculations show large relevant external liabilities in Greece, Portugal, Ireland and Spain. This analysis highlights that currency depreciation following exit from the Eurozone would substantially increase the external debt burden of these countries….”
“Meanwhile, we note that estimated balance sheet effects following exit in the case of Italy and France, are substantially smaller than in other peripheral countries, mainly as a function of the prevalence of local law obligations (which can be redenominated) within external liabilities. It follows that policy makers and investors should pay close attention to the size of balance sheet effect (not only to standard competitiveness and the trade effects) when thinking about the macro impact of specific exit scenarios”.
So, summing up briefly, while the Monti Government’s structural reforms are obviously a step in the right direction it is unlikely they will go either far enough or fast enough to significantly lift the country’s potential growth rate from its present lamentable level. Further, as the April 2013 election approaches the growing popularity of new political movements like Beppe Grillo’s Five Star one could easily lead to the kind of political fragmentation already seen in Greece – Italy has hardly been a model example of the two party system – making the traditional political forces which back the Monti Government even more reluctant to accelerate the adoption of far-reaching reform.
And going beyond April, the political arithmetic of a post Monti government looks complicated, making the kind of stability needed to advance what the population may well see as “harsh” reforms unlikely. In other words, as Monti says, when I go watch out for the populists!
18 Responses to “Is The Italian Elephant About To Break Loose Again?”
i now the situation in IT .THIS IS NOT NEW ..is THe same bad with GR SP ..ROMA needed to fix fiscal financare problem ..
this is a great piece. thx for writing.
Italy should look at Japan which has similar economic problems and a gigantic debt / gdp of over 200%. Yet Japan can borrow for 10 years at less than 1%, the key is the Yen and Japans monetary sovereignty.
Either the euro will have to be changed to emulate the effects of monetary sovereignty or Italy will have to establish its own by leaving or forcing others to leave. Either way, sovereign countries should not fear default, only lower living standards and inflation. The leaders of the Euro area need to understand this if they want to solve the crisis. Borrowing costs for monetary sovereign nations are not related to debt / deficit fundamentals.
Not sure things are that simple MB194. In the first place I\’m not sure it is a strong positive to have debt to GDP at 230% and rising, as they do in Japan. Not sure monetary sovereignty is such a good thing in the Japan case either. Have you seen where the yen is recently? Sometimes I make the joke, should Japan exit the yen.
We are in a new, complex situation, where many of the old recipes do not work. What Japan and Italy have in common is that they are very old societies where domestic demand is weak. They thus depend on exports for growth, and yes, you are right, Italy does need to devalue. But it also needs to massively improve its institutional quality. Are you sure that a Euro exit lead by Berlusconi and Beppe Grillo would bring good results in this respect? Have you looked at Argentina recently?
Of course the Euro should never have been set up, but it was. Now we will need a pair of fine pincers to resolve the massive problems it has created, and most of the tools available are rough chisels. But the Euro only complicates a problem shared to one degree or another by all developed economies – excessive debt in an age of unprecedented population ageing.
We may all wish to go back to the world of the maternal hearth, but it is gone forever, and we have to live in the world we have now created. As Thomas Wolfe said, you can look homeward angel, but you can never go home again.
There's a still worse problem beyond this heavy "cahier de doléances". In Italy, 95% (or more) of people have no idea of the real issues, of the real storm building up offshore. The whole country is still runnig on very old cultural softwares full of bugs and jams with very pale idea of how the real world outside move and evolve. People are mesmerized by harsh debates on false premises. Political conflict is still locked on jurassic schemes of exploited workers and rich crooks but no consistent step has been taken to cut down the very long claws of dozens of privileged and protected groups, first of all the politicians' mob, that's still sucking out an estimated yearly 4% of GDP through illegal procedures and blackmail. Few voices show up to talk about what it really takes to be a modern western economy but as soon as you question some well established and untouchable "rights", the outcry gets so deafening that nothing really happens or happens the italian way: either everybody agrees and then nothing happens or changes are enforced in such a twisted and distorted ways that "tutto cambia perché niente cambi" as in the "Gattopardo" novel: "all change so that nothing really changes". The only outcome I reasonably see is a sharp fall of GDP and way of life. We'll just drop to the level we're worth, well under western standards.
I was not complementing Japan on their economic situation, far from it. Simply pointing out that Italian yields are at 6%+ and Japans are less than 1%. This can't be explained by debt / deficit fundamentals. Japans demographics and public debt position is arguably worse than Italy's. As PK pointed out (http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/16/italy-versus-japan/)
Logically Japan should pay more than Italy to borrow, it doesn't because of the existence of the BOJ. The problem Japan faces is a chronic lack of growth, deflation and maintaining its very high standard of living. Default is not an issue because the BOJ will never run out of Yen.
I also don't think Italy should leave the EMU. The simplest solution would be for the ECB to guarantee the debts of Italy (&Spain + the rest) emulating a normal sovereign central bank. Simply state they will not tolerate a spread to bunds across the curve over a fixed amount and create as many € as necessary to enforce this.
The crux of the borrowing cost issue in the EMU is the German view on expanding the monetary base and general miss understanding of the monetary system. This is preventing the obvious solution. The fear that expanding the monetary base in an extremely depressed economy will generate hyperinflation.
Pushing down borrowing costs should be quite easy, the difficulty is maintaining living standards with an aging population and continual falling output as your article shows. Austerity is certainly not the answer though, firstly the EMU needs to function as if its constituent members had monetary sovereignty. Secondly massive long term structural reform is needed if future generations wish to have the same or better standards of living as the current generation.
\”Pushing down borrowing costs should be quite easy, the difficulty is maintaining living standards with an aging population and continual falling output as your article shows. Austerity is certainly not the answer though, firstly the EMU needs to function as if its constituent members had monetary sovereignty. Secondly massive long term structural reform is needed if future generations wish to have the same or better standards of living as the current generation\”.
Then in this part we more or less agree. I only wanted to suggest that the Japan example is a red herring, because monetary sovereignty no longer exists in a globalised world. Just look at the UK for example, which badly needs a devaluation of the pound sterling, but which can\’t achieve it due to having to coexist with the Euro crisis. This kind of economic thinking belongs to the 20th century.
The ECB could and should bring down yields, but the Italians can and should find responsible politicians capable of saving their country. You can\’t expect Mario Draghi to monetise Italian debt so Berlusconi can buy votes. This is the problem with clientilist systems.
Marco, sadly I have to agree with you. At least about the in denial part. It's such a pity, since Italy is a country I visit regularly – the flight from Girona to Pisa is only about an hour – and I have a strong sentimental attachment to Italian culture. But as you rightly indicate, it is not a culture that is well adapted to change.
while probably generally true, the problem with looking at single countries (be it italy, spain or other) is, that there are limits to the proposed solutions for a single country. The EU had more or less balanced trade with non-EU countries. So to make exports the economic driver for all countries would require, that other (developing) countries to have substancial trade deficits with the EU. Which can't be a sustainable solution for the long term (10, 20 years) plus the Euro or EU currencies would just appreciate until exports would rather shrink.
The other point (mentioned on the slides only) seems more relevant, i would say the *average* EU citizen does not need any GDP growth for a very good living standard. Just an example aren't there already too much SUVs on the street of the EU ? Would the average life standard improve if we'd double the number? Or an US like "McMansion" for every family? So in reality there is no real change of the economic issues and problems. The jobless especially are not part of the average, they are below. The imbalances indeed, but not of countries, but of all EU people. If credit is no longer available or the Euro breaks up, then poorer Italians will buy less german cars, generally much less german goods. Will this help german Exports ? Of course not, the (then) jobless german workers will also spend less ( maybe less on italian cars ). And all this while in principle there is more money per the average EU citizen than never before. But it just sits there in the billions at an ECB account for 0% interest. And it will sit there, until someone decides to spend it for *whatever* reason. The jobless can't (and should not) care for what it is spend, only THAT is it spent. Will Europe really wait for the populists? I'm sure they will spend it in ways, most people will not be happy with when this time comes.
Excellent analysis as usual! Let me add a political dimension to the discussion. I stressed this in my latest blog article on the Euro crisis "Euro crisis gets interesting" <a href="http://(http://amaliatank.blogspot.gr/2012/08/the-euro-sovereign-debt-crisis-finally.htm)” target=”_blank”>(http://amaliatank.blogspot.gr/2012/08/the-euro-sovereign-debt-crisis-finally.htm). As economic conditions deteriorate in these masochistic debt deflation downward spirals though internal devaluations, national resentments rise against the Brussels elite and the forced integration. Italy does not want to be pushed around like Greece. Also they see the scorched earth in Greece through EU meddling and the impoverishment of the general population. Sooner or later this will lead to a populist movement, who will say to hell with the Eurozone, etc. Already you see Berlusconi. Ambrose Pritchard-Evans writes that Italian-German relations are at the worst level in many years. The Italians may simply revolt and bring down the system. This may actually promote Italian industry. There is the national chauvinism and resentment in reaction to years of German chauvinism bilking the Eurozone to promote their exports. Remember it was the Italians who wrecked the Latin zone…..
You want a Memorandum of Understanding from an Italian Politician before "turning the reigns over"? Here's what that looks like :http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmbTUxW0JZs
WHAT A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE! Speaking of that…what the heck is going on with Greece :http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iPow4vEvI9usOwoSJ6iMGa8CD0gQ?docId=CNG.921494ceac36ee87db88ce5097daf692.e1 5 years of a "German rescue" and it sure seems like there's a "lot of room for improvement there"! have we ever had anything like this in peacetime in the history of Western Civilization? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qo_E6qOIcnM apparently they meant a bail IN….not a bail OUT.
Ed, thanks, I can see I won't have to teach my course in Riga this fall, I'll just give the kids your url
Hi Hugh I'm translating this post in correct Italian, would you like a copy? I think all Italians should read this, the google traslation is not great, let me know, Ida Pagnottella fee based financial advisor in Italy
Hi Ida, that seems like a heck of a lot of work to me, but thanks for your efforts. I'd love a copy if you do it. You can find my mail on my EconoMonitor Bio Page.
Another excellent and understandable analysis Edward to follow that one on Spain. Wish you could do a similar analysis on UK economy….
Although I have not done proper research, this whole question of surplus exporting nations versus deficit nations was one Keynes did grapple with towards the end of his life. I believe at Bretton Woods he tried to get penalty payments or fines to be imposed on countries with too large a surplus in exports but this was scuppered by the US ( at the time a country vastly in surplus)… Of course a system like this would not have solved the inner structural problems of Italy but it would have made a better Eurozone from the start.
If you wanna know how Italy will look like in 2 years, look at Greece today. Look at what austerity did to them and you can get a rough idea of how Italy will look like.
Off course by then, things could change for the better (slightly) but dont expect major changes. It will take time for the euro-south to get organised and gain competitiveness again. Things have been they have they have been (in the eurosouth) for 4-5 decades. they cant change overnight. But apply the German model and German determination and Europe could turn out to be an autonomous region with valued (diversified) exports of all kinds. From cars and industrial products to agriculture, education and technology. But it will take (at least) a couple of decades of hard work to get there. And alot of political-financial unification.
There is no way Italy will be like Greece as the Italian people are far more productive and resilient and will always find a way out