EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

New Roubini Project Syndicate Op-Ed Pondering on the Financial Markets Rally

From the Taipei Times:

The risks of a double-dip, W-shaped recession may be growing

By Nouriel Roubini

In the past three months, global asset prices have rebounded sharply: Stock prices have increased by more than 30 percent in advanced economies and by much more in most emerging markets. Prices of commodities — oil, energy, and minerals — have soared; corporate credit spreads (the difference between the yield of corporate and government bonds) have narrowed dramatically, as government-bond yields have increased sharply; volatility (the “fear gauge”) has fallen; and the dollar has weakened as demand for safe dollar assets has abated.

But is the recovery of asset prices driven by economic fundamentals? Is it sustainable? Is the recovery in stock prices another bear-market rally or the beginning of a bullish trend?

While economic data suggests that improvement in fundamentals has occurred — the risk of a near depression has been reduced; the prospects of the global recession bottoming out by year end are increasing; and risk sentiment is improving — it is equally clear that other, less sustainable factors are also playing a role. Moreover, the sharp rise in some asset prices threatens the recovery of a global economy that has not yet hit bottom. Indeed, many risks of a downward market correction remain.

First, confidence and risk aversion are fickle, and bouts of renewed volatility may occur if macroeconomic and financial data were to surprise on the downside — as they may if a near-term and robust global recovery (which many people expect) does not materialize.

Second, extremely loose monetary policies (zero interest rates, quantitative easing, new credit facilities, emissions of government bonds and purchases of illiquid and risky private assets), together with the huge sums spent to stabilize the financial system, may be causing a new liquidity-driven asset bubble in financial and commodity markets. For example, Chinese state-owned enterprises that gained access to huge amounts of easy money and credit are buying equities and stockpiling commodities well beyond their productive needs.

CORRECTION

The risk of a correction in the face of disappointing macroeconomic fundamentals is clear. Indeed, recent data from the US and other advanced economies suggest that the recession may last through the end of the year. Worse, the recovery is likely to be anemic and sub-par — well below potential for a couple of years, if not longer — as the burden of debts and leverage of the private sector combine with rising public sector debts to limit the ability of households, financial firms and corporations to lend, borrow, spend, consume and invest.

This more challenging scenario of anemic recovery undermines hopes for a V-shaped recovery, as low growth and deflationary pressures constrain earnings and profit margins and as unemployment rates above 10 percent in most advanced economies cause financial shocks to re-emerge, owing to mounting losses for banks’ and financial institutions’ portfolios of loans and toxic assets. At the same time, financial crises in a number of emerging markets could prove contagious, placing additional stress on global financial markets.

The increase in some asset prices may, moreover, lead to a W-shaped, double-dip recession. In particular, thanks to massive liquidity, energy prices are now rising too high too soon. The role that high oil prices played last summer in tipping the global economy into recession should not be underestimated. Oil above US$140 a barrel was the last straw — coming on top of the housing busts and financial shocks — for the global economy, as it represented a massive supply shock for the US, Europe, Japan, China and other net importers of oil.

DEFICITS

Meanwhile, rising fiscal deficits in most economies are now pushing up the yields of long-term government bonds. Some of the rise in long rates is a necessary correction, as investors are now pricing a global recovery. But some of this increase is driven by more worrisome factors: the effects of large budget deficits and debt on sovereign risk, and thus on real interest rates; and concerns that the incentive to monetize these large deficits will lead to high inflation after the global economy recovers from next year to 2011 and deflationary forces abate. The crowding out of private demand, owing to higher government-bond yields — and the ensuing increase in mortgage rates and other private yields — could in turn endanger the recovery.

As a result, one cannot rule out that by late next year or 2011, a perfect storm of oil above US$100 a barrel, rising government-bond yields and tax increases (as governments seek to avoid debt-refinancing risks) may lead to a renewed growth slowdown, if not an outright double-dip recession.

The recent recovery of asset prices from their March lows is in part justified by fundamentals, as the risks of global financial meltdown and depression have fallen and confidence has improved.

But much of the rise is not justified, as it is driven by excessively optimistic expectations of a rapid recovery of growth toward its potential level and by a liquidity bubble that is raising oil prices and equities too fast too soon. A negative oil shock, together with rising government-bond yields — could clip the recovery’s wings and lead to a significant further downturn in asset prices and in the real economy.

Nouriel Roubini is professor of economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University, and chairman of RGE Monitor.

81 Responses to “New Roubini Project Syndicate Op-Ed Pondering on the Financial Markets Rally”

GuestJune 21st, 2009 at 2:22 pm

Keynes would have said: “The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent”

tgJune 21st, 2009 at 2:39 pm

“As a result, one cannot rule out that by late next year or 2011, a perfect storm of oil above US$100 a barrel, rising government-bond yields and tax increases (as governments seek to avoid debt-refinancing risks) may lead to a renewed growth slowdown, if not an outright double-dip recession.”Why would it take so long?It can easily happen until the end of 2009 or earlier.

SoftwarengineerJune 21st, 2009 at 2:48 pm

ACTUALLY THE 30% REBOUND IN THE STOCK MARKET IS SHORT-TERM THINKINGUsing its high last summer [DOW 14,000], its not only plummetted about 40%, since May 2009, the short term stock profits are about 0%.The saving grace, since the COLA on fed retirees’ is currently deflationary at -3.2%….the 0% short term stock market, since May 2009, made you some money…LOL

economicminorJune 21st, 2009 at 3:52 pm

I posted this at the end of the last thread.Green shoots If you fertilize and water a fallow field you will get a huge crop of green weeds. If you don’t kill the weeds, they go to seed, affecting the surrounding land. If you continue this process, even the productive lands spend so much controlling weeds that their profitability declines and their productivity declines. When the productive lands is encumbered with debt there is a point in this process where that land is defaulted on and allowed to go fallow.. If the government continues its process of fertilizing and watering the fallow fields, we will continue to have less. The more the government does, the less the people have. It is just the way the world works.  So don’t get to excited about green shoots unless you know they are not government funded weeds.From reading NR’s latest, I have to say he is getting it. Deficits used to prop up failing institutions is the same as fertilizing and watering weeds. They will not produce food or usable fiber or anything useful. All they do is waste away our resources and make us all poorer.When the Marie Antoinettes living in castles in the clouds make the rules, we all lose. We need a government of the people, by the people and for the people put back in place. Corporate rule just doesn’t work!

GuestJune 21st, 2009 at 4:51 pm

e,yes. where are the intelligent, honest and awarein government? crowded out by money and politicalmachines. lcd.

amacflyJune 21st, 2009 at 6:13 pm

Lobby, lobby, lobby, the all American way.The Fed, a privately owned banking cartel, controls the money that pays all our politicians. Dem & Rep Inc are both bought and paid for, which is exactly how we got into this mess. Big finance making big donations to get the rules and restrictions put in place after previous disasters repealed so they could run hog wild again, oh, yes, and in the process give loads of their newly multiplied proceeds back to the politicians.Oh, what a wonderful system! So simple to understand, so difficult to hold to task, and so indignantly drunk on its own righteousness. Reading the fall of Rome, the parallels are startling, and startling obvious!Regardless of party in power no one is putting Humpty back together again any time soon. Even if we sail out of this storm intact, which I think we will, we’ll witness a rapid change in the way the world regards us, resulting in a possible collapse of the Anglo-Saxon models. There is no way Geitner gets laughed at in China without that representing a very, very serious sea change in opinion which will translate to an irreversible shift in world power. The USA used the debt of the lease/lend program to destroy the British Empire, yet now the situation is reversed and no one seems to see it, or if they do they aren’t saying anything about it.Thank you Mr Wilson, you sold your country to the money changers, first allowing us all to be the victims of their usury and fraud, and now as a result of their unbridled irresponsibility and absolute greed our country has been sold down the river of debt.What next?

PeteCAJune 21st, 2009 at 6:22 pm

Brian – don’t know if you saw it, but there was a paper published earler this year (analysis of US currency) that had an estimate that said if the US dollar goes off reserve status, the fall in value would be something like 60-70%. Quite close to your personal estimates for a 2/3 drop in value.As Chris Puplava said recently on a commentary, it’s a process and not an event. But it’s interesting that some key players (incl China and Russia) are meeting in Moscow soon – without participation of the USA. And also interesting that the BRIC countries seem to be moving towards new trading agreements with coordinated strategies (to trade directly with their own currencies). There’s no breaking point yet, but some whittling down in the “supremacy” of the US dollar. I would think that currency investors must start to factor this into their calculations.PeteCA

BrianJune 21st, 2009 at 7:03 pm

PeteCA,I did not see that paper, but it seems like it would be an interesting read for me.I have come by my estimate from a very interesting route. I’ll share the story with you and everyone. It’s amusing and insightful (imho).About 7 years ago, I started playing a massively multiuser online game called Asheron’s Call. This game had 20,000+ players spread across several game servers (Worlds). Each world was entirely self-contained, meaning that once a player chose a World, they could not transfer any assets to a different world, nor could they move themselves to a different world.The game had an amazingly vibrant economy. There were many items which users could earn, collect and possess. When I began playing, the game was already mature, and there were several classes of items that were used as in-game currencies. Two items in particular, were traded by players as a proxy for cash. Those were “Shards” and “Sing keys.” Each of those items had a use in world which imparted them a value. (More on this in a bit).After playing the game for a few months, I did what I always do, which was find a way to beat it. I found that players would often spend hours trying to “buy” some suit of armor or sword or something, or trying to sell some possession to raise cash… I developed a software system that turned my character into a Robotic Trading System (a trade-bot) that stood in the same place 24/7, and bought and sold items with a profit margin for me on both sides of the trade.At first, I spent a great deal of time determining the values of each item in the game, and the prices shifted often, but soon, my trade bot became known worldwide, and with volume came price stability.I opened two trade bots, one on each of two of these Worlds. Interestingly, in one of the worlds, Shards were the “reserve currency.” In the other, Sing Keys were the standard. Since both copies of the game ran identically, I found it a fascinating study to observe the economies from the standpoint of what was effectively a currency exchange service. Noting the difference in value on each server between the items.As it turns out, all the items on both servers had approximately the same value relative to each other – except for Shards and Sings – the two items that had the status of reserve currency.Now, without getting into too much detail (I can’t tell if this story is interesting to anyone but me lol), I will say that each month, the maker of the game put out a software update. The update would change some of the activities that users could do, and thus would change the abundance of some items. In one such update, the software maker altered the availability of Shards – making them easier to find. They subsequently corrected this change, but by essentially “printing money” they inadvertently caused a massive shift in the economy of the World in which Shards were the primary reserve currency.That world never recovered. Within a week, Sing keys had replaced shards as the reserve. The value of Sing keys more than doubled. Interestingly, the value on the other world was unchanged. Shards dropped in value to almost exactly what they would be worth if they were used for their intended purpose (they could be converted into a special armor, which had a set value), and thus, by losing their status as the main currency, they dropped in value, and that value loss remained, even when the supply returned to normal.Lest you think the economy here was small, I will tell you that although this was just a small hobby for me (I am the CEO of a substantial company), the value of my profit from the currency exchange amounted to many thousands of dollars each month…From this test case within a unique parallel virtual world economy microcosm, I was able to see the kind of added value a currency gets from having “Reserve Currency” status. It may be a stretch to say that the US dollar would react in the same way as Shards and Sings, but based on two data points – one where the Worlds were identical, but simply evolved economies based on different reserves, and seeing the price differential between those two currencies; and the second, where the “Government” printed some money in one of the Worlds, and the resultant value change that was rapid and permanent, I feel quite confident that in the real world, a similar value must be imparted to the US Dollar from it’s status.I can’t see why a rapid change in the supply of dollars, or a weakening of status of the dollar would have a different result from the test cases that I observed back in my carefree days, when my worst fear of an economic collapse was when a competitor developed their own tradebot and competition started in earnest ;-) –Brian

Free TibetJune 21st, 2009 at 7:29 pm

Yes. Or, as I have said so many times, reform will stop at recapitalizing the bankrupt and some token feel good gesture at “regulation” – maybe salary caps for the less well politically connected – to pacify us and make us feel all is well. Pabulum for the masses. But the miss-allocation of resources goes unaddressed as TPTB hope to benefit from someone else’s industry and the broken business models patched up in unsustainable fashion.Who cares about someone else’s irrationality? Care to try to time that market? This policy will not work. We know that. Though the deck is stacked against us, get out now. No more junk food. No more junk bonds. It’s time to think healthy. We must distance ourselves not to be buried in the ruble. We must own that which cannot be diluted by the corrupt. Our own individual means of production.

Free TibetJune 21st, 2009 at 7:37 pm

There is no way Geitner gets laughed at in China without that representing a very, very serious sea change in opinion…

You betcha… and without a strong dollar all of our business models are broken. All of them. The study of the fall of Rome and the early middle ages is something I’m still working on. Clearly, the enthusiasm with which western Europe embraced feudalism after the fall is significant.

GuestJune 21st, 2009 at 7:56 pm

I think he is adorably cute. Did he turn you down for a date? Is that why you are so angry? Or maybe he got your woman?

MichelleJune 21st, 2009 at 8:02 pm

Are you John Ryskamp? Your comments are cruel and downright mean. Do something more constructive and positive with your time.

AnonymousJune 21st, 2009 at 8:14 pm

“Underlying these challenges is our broken political system. Our representatives, unlike our Founding Fathers, see politics as a career. As a result, they are focused not on the next generation, but on the next election. When the long-term problems are large and real, they anesthetize us, mislead us, divert us—anything to keep us from giving up something or having to pay for it. Too often, our political leaders are just enablers, co-conspirators in a disingenuous and greedy silence. Our children are unrepresented. The future is unrepresented.”http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/06/guest-post-meaning-of-enough.html#links

MM CAJune 21st, 2009 at 8:28 pm

NO JOBS- California rate announced at 11.5%. Remember everyone, the numbers reported are for those still COLLECTING Unemployment Benefits. so when 100K or more fall off the total number, it doesnt mean they found a job. In fact U6 Unemplyoment is approaching 18% now. And when you have 100K or more falling off weekly you can bet that, that number will correlate to unpaid Mortgages, unpaid Loans of all types.The stimulas plan is joke in terms of creating jobs. Obama will be a one term president because of this statemnt “I will create 3.5 Million jobs”.Obama stimulus plans no help for surging unemploymentThe rush to push through the Stimulus plan, without being read, by Obama and Democrats in Congress has done little to reduce the growing unemployment rate. It is now the highest it has been in 25 years.All 48 states and the District of Columbia reported increases including:Illinois 10.1 percentIndiana 10.6 percentOhio nearing 10.8 percentMichigan at 12.9 percentCalifornia 11.5 percent (later reported at 14%)Oregon 12.4 percentSouth Carolina’s 12.1 percentRhode Island 12.1 percentNevada’s 11.3 percentNorth Carolina 11.1 percent.Florida 10.2 percentKentucky 10.6 percentTennessee 10.7 percentVirginia 7.1 prcentDistrict of Columbia 10.7 percentMaryland 7.2 percentOver six million jobs have been lost since the U.S. recession began. and in 18 months the unemployment rate soared from 4.9 percent to 9.4 percent. It is expected to exceed 10 percent by the end of 2009.President Obama had forcast about two percentage points lower in his fiscal 2010 budget predictions when he pushed for the economic stimulus package that was passed in February 2009.To read the entire article, go to:http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/20/unemployment-rate-hits-highest-level-in-25-years/?source=newsletter_must-read-stories-today_more_news_carousel

kilgoresJune 21st, 2009 at 9:11 pm

Wow. How patently true and insightful that bit of commentary is. Thanks for posting it.SWK

GuestJune 21st, 2009 at 10:34 pm

These parasites just might finish what they started”The investment banks more than any other institutions created the culture of excessive leverage, excessive risk and excessive bonuses that led to the downfall of the financial system. Now they are cashing in and the same bonus culture has returned. The result must be that we are being pushed to the edge of another crash.”

MichelleJune 21st, 2009 at 11:01 pm

Several months ago I posted a comment stating “Operation Jubilee June 1.” My supposition was that lenders may be encouraged to write-off debt faster than in previous recessions, and this link offers a clue that this in fact may be happening:http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budgeting/article/107200/credit-bailout-issuers-slashing-card-balances?mod=bb-creditcardsIs the consumer deleveraging faster than expected, thereby prompting a quicker recovery? I know, NO JOBS, but this is a start in the right direction in my opinion. Mark-to-market accounting changes benefited the banks, maybe it’s time to pass along some of these benefits to the over-leveraged consumer.

AnonymousJune 21st, 2009 at 11:47 pm

I spent an extra few minutes in bed this morning just so I could dream about Roubini! Sigh . . .

AnonymousJune 21st, 2009 at 11:51 pm

Are TPTB putting something in the water? I’ve been dragging around for the past week exhausted. My kids are complaining of being tired too. Maybe TPTB see what is happening in Tehran and are fearful of retribution against their own abuses so are taking preventative action to sedate us.It’s a new conspiracy theory, but not so outlandish given the reality of what Bush proved the government capable of doing and how much is still hidden from view.

MM CAJune 21st, 2009 at 11:52 pm

NO JOBS now or anytime soon and as posted above…Goldman to make record bonus payoutshttp://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/21/goldman-sachs-bonus-paymentsthink for a moment about that headline and consider what it implies…When are people going to finally wake-up to the fleecing and 300 millions wealth continues…

AnonymousJune 22nd, 2009 at 12:05 am

Very well put. This could apply to almost all democracies today.The ‘spirit’ of democracy has been lost and strange ideologies are prowling the landscape with confidence.

AnonymousJune 22nd, 2009 at 12:32 am

The US “patriots/evangelist” thinks the “EVIL IRANIAN” knows nothin about democracyand now these Evil Iranian’s have instead revolted against the current regime because of Fixed Ballotsyou know what this mean??Those Iranians have bigger/more balls compared to US citizens,man this is pathetic…

Little SaverJune 22nd, 2009 at 1:15 am

The somewhat knee-jerk rebound since March has been driven by short covering, “green shoots” optimism, and a misplaced belief that stocks are cheap just because they’ve declined from untenable overvaluations. That dynamic has largely played out, and now requires real, tangible economic improvements to justify further strength.http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc090622.htm

AnonymousJune 22nd, 2009 at 1:18 am

Gulp!!!http://www.newswatch50.com/news/local/story/Homeland-Security-drone-patrolling-NNY/8ujqf9M2YkCXVlOmBVxFOg.cspxHomeland Security drone patrolling NNYA monitor inside an operations trailer shows a close-up view of a boat skimming across the water on Lake Ontario.The image was taken from an unmanned aircraft more than three miles away.A Predator B Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) has been temporarily based at Fort Drum since early June in “AN EXPERIMENT” by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office.The Department of Homeland Security is using the extensive restricted air space over Fort Drum to test whether the drone could be a good fit along this stretch of the northern border.

NewRoJune 22nd, 2009 at 1:27 am

This website has changed extensively. Used to be insights and good analysis and it is now about Roubini self praise and videos on how accurate he is. In the meantime, other great websites are popping, that match what rgemonitor used to be.

AnonymousJune 22nd, 2009 at 2:00 am

g what is there to comments anymore???talk, comments lead to nothin.. the bloggers over here (i think) have realized about itwhile we talk / comments… the Perpetrator keep scheming the peopleall that needs to be said have been saidits time to react..

Little SaverJune 22nd, 2009 at 2:18 am

Last week, the firm predicted that President Barack Obama’s government could issue $3.25tn of debt before September, almost four times last year’s sum. Goldman, a prime broker of US government bonds, is expected to make hundreds of millions of dollars in profits from selling and dealing in the bonds.http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/jun/21/goldman-sachs-bonus-paymentsThe bigger the deficits, the bigger the profits, the bigger the bonuses. What’s the problem with deficits if you may sell them with a profit margin and pay a small part of it back to politicians? Everybody happily hooked with these blissful honest mistakes.

AnonymousJune 22nd, 2009 at 6:20 am

Wh would you worry about Goldman? They made money in this market shile te good professor kept you out of the market. If you had made money in the market would you wan to share it with someone who didn’t take the risk with you? Grow up

AnonymousJune 22nd, 2009 at 6:26 am

The professor has kept us out of a tradeable rally he now gives some credibility. He missed it. So now I read lot of complainers instead of thinkers. We deserve more for the money we pay.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 6:53 am

no, $usd and $usb not safehaven.looking at $usd and $usb chart, it is weak and in downtrened -> short it until is not

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 6:57 am

Goldman, they used Paulson connection to get TARP money to AIG so they make money on CDS trade on taxpayer expense. Sweet. :)

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 7:01 am

I get Geithner is in bed in this scheme taxpayer too. Geithner is the one insist that taxpayer must honor Las Vegas style bet among financial institution. Politician and government officials are corrupt, what can you do?

FEDupJune 22nd, 2009 at 7:35 am

Lack of transparency=lack of adequate regulationLack of transparency=lack of fairness in systemLack of tranparency=lack of healthy economy for allLack of tranparency=lack of truthLack of tranparency=lack of a viable solutionLack of tranparency=lack of a democracy

MichelleJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:05 am

Is the market moving on fundamentals? Everyone here seems to think so, NR suggests perhaps not. This morning the futures are down sharply, but why, you may ask. Is it because of Iran, North Korea, economic news, or something else? I believe it is a function of liquidity, or a lack thereof. Anyone that has followed my past posts knows where to find the answer.

London BankerJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:18 am

$104 billion needed for this week’s Treasury auction – and that means that the US Treasury is sucking the oxygen out of all other global asset classes. Function of liquidity indeed, but as is usual with these orchestrations, the rest of the world will suffer disproportionately. Wall Street will be down but outperforming as the dollar strengthens due to repatriated cash pulled from foreign markets. Then cue the “flight to quality” tape . . .Lather, rinse, repeat.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:32 am

http://english.caijing.com.cn/2009-06-19/110186641.htmlRead Andy Xie by way of Naked Capitalism. The Chinesehave turned on the Credit Pumps, but the consequencesare speculation in commodities by chinese businessmen. Who wants to take a risk on production, when they can follow Goldman Sachs in the Casino and get in and out. The real problem is that Global Aggregate Demand cannot handle EXISTING Global Aggregate Supply of Goods. Why? The globalization of labor markets creates a labor pool that can’t affordto consume. Try selling Gucci to near slaves! It is so simple, yet so taboo to speak about! One billion people are going to bed hungry according to the United Nations. Has somebody done the math? There areno consumers for the PRODUCTION BUBBLE! There is too much near-slave labor to create any consumption!!!What have the powers that be done in the past? Blow up the inventory with some senseless war.SUPPLY-BLOWN UP INVENTORY=DEMAND+DEBTHey! Now the equation balances!!You cannot run a nuclear world like this!!!!

MM CAJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:33 am

finally getting the attention – NO JOBS!Recovery’s Missing Ingredient: New JobsExperts Warn of A Long Dry SpellDespite signs that the recession gripping the nation’s economy may be easing, the unemployment rate is projected to continue rising for another year before topping out in double digits, a prospect that threatens to slow growth, increase poverty and further complicate the Obama administration’s message of optimism about the economic outlook.This StoryRecovery’s Missing Ingredient: New JobsThe likelihood of severe unemployment extending into the 2010 midterm elections and beyond poses a significant political hurdle to President Obama and congressional Democrats, who are already under fire for what critics label profligate spending. Continuing high unemployment rates would undercut the fundamental argument behind much of that spending: the promise that it will create new jobs and improve the prospects of working Americans, which Obama has called the ultimate measure of a healthy economy.”Our hope would be to actually create some jobs this year,” Obama said in an interview with The Washington Post in the days before taking office.Obama has defended his economic approach — which includes the $787 billion economic stimulus plan and record investments in health care, alternative energy, education and job training — as necessary to stabilize the shaky economy and point the way to job growth.So far, the White House has counseled patience even as the political debate surrounding its economic policies grows more urgent. Officials point out that job growth will not come until robust economic expansion takes hold, which they expect will happen as stimulus funding works its way through the economy. Still, the flagging job market is likely to stir calls for further stimulus efforts as polls show voters growing increasingly wary of federal spending in the wake of a costly series of financial- and auto-industry bailouts and amid current efforts to expand health-care coverage to the uninsured, which is estimated to cost at least $1 trillion over the next decade.With many forecasters projecting unemployment to remain above 10 percent next year and not return to pre-recession levels of roughly 5 percent for years after that, Obama is likely to be confronted with defending the effectiveness of his economic policies as the nation endures its worst employment situation in a generation.Analysts say the high levels of joblessness would be accompanied by increases in child poverty, strained government budgets, and black and Latino unemployment rates approaching 20 percent.”I find it unfathomable that people are not horrified about what is going to happen,” said Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute. “I regard all this talk about how the recession is maybe going to end, all the talk about deficits and inflation, to be the equivalent of telling Americans, ‘You are just going to have to tough it out.’ But we’re looking at persistent unemployment that is going to be extraordinarily damaging to many communities. There is a ton of pain in the pipeline.”Christina Romer, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, said that while the president is “very concerned” about the unemployment forecasts, the White House has assumed “a posture of watchful waiting,” adding: “There will be big increases in stimulus spending in the fall and early next year. We have to wait to see what happens with that. If you get to the end of this year or early next year and employment is still limping back, then we have to do some serious thinking about whether there might be special problems in the labor market that require targeted interventions.”Before passage of the stimulus bill, the Obama administration had predicted that unemployment would peak at 8 percent before beginning to abate this fall. But unemployment has already reached 9.4 percent, the highest level in a quarter-century, and the situation is not projected to start improving until long after the White House had predicted.Many economists agree that the job market would be in much worse shape had the stimulus package not been enacted. And some say more stimulus measures may be needed, even as the federal government grapples with a huge budget deficit.”There is a good economic argument to be made that the government has not done enough stimulus,” said Niko Karvounis, a policy analyst at the New America Foundation who recently wrote a report warning that the economic recovery is likely to be tepid and accompanied by unusually high unemployment.But with polls showing increasing public opposition to government spending and with no significant constituency mobilized to push for more government investment in jobs, the political prospects for any further stimulus legislation seem slim. Meanwhile, the continued rise in unemployment is creating an opening for Republican critics, who have criticized the level of spending Obama has pursued to try to fix the economy.”They even predicted that if we passed it quickly, unemployment wouldn’t go higher than 8 percent. Well, here we are just a few months later and the unemployment rate is approaching 10 percent,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.). “The administration admits that their earlier predictions were a guess — and that they guessed wrong.”Obama tersely acknowledged in an interview with Bloomberg Television last week that unemployment is likely to peak above 10 percent. That prediction is in line with a growing number of respected economic forecasts, including those of private economists and the Congressional Budget Office, which projects that the unemployment rate will continue to rise into the second half of next year.”Unemployment won’t peak until this time next year, and then it will remain very high through next year,” said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s Economy.com. “It won’t get back to full employment until 2013 or 2014. This really speaks to the severity of the job losses that have been absorbed by the economy. They were massive.”Since the recession took hold in December 2007, the U.S. economy has lost 5.7 million jobs, a rapid decline that caught administration and other economists off guard. In recent months, the velocity of job losses has slowed substantially, which, combined with a rising stock market and increases in consumer spending, has offered hope that a recovery is beginning to take hold.But employers still cut 345,000 jobs last month, while the nation’s growing working-age population requires the job market to expand by 125,000 to 150,000 a month just to keep the unemployment rate stable.The dynamics of the modern economy further dim the employment picture. Job growth was weak for years after the past two recessions, in 1991 and 2001. Employers have grown increasingly slow to rehire workers, and steady advances in technology have allowed businesses to do more with fewer workers.While the recession has touched workers across the spectrum, “many of the job losses are in manufacturing and construction, affecting less-educated workers and immigrants,” Zandi said. “It is going to be hard for them to find their way back into the workforce quickly.”Meanwhile, the current recession has been characterized by the implosion of the housing market and the near collapse of the financial sector and automobile industry. Despite huge federal interventions, many of the jobs in those industries are gone for good.High unemployment also does not bode well for consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the nation’s economic activity, putting further pressure on the job market.”We have not seen the highest unemployment rate, and this is going to go on for a long time,” Mishel said. “The political conversation seems to be that we have already dealt with the recession. But we need to have a conversation about how we are going to get to the other side, where employment is growing again.”

MM CAJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:34 am

Link to articlehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/21/AR2009062101859.html?hpid=topnews

MM CAJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:39 am

Chime on your feeling for US GDP the rest of thsi year and in 2010. I stated in late 08 we would be -6% for all of 09- and it seems we are right on pace for that. for 2010 i see neg -2.5 to -4.5% as a possiblilty.World Bank: Recovery? Not So MuchWe’re not sure what the World Bank’s track record is on this stuff. We’re guessing it’s about as good as any other group at forecasting the economy, which means: crapshoot. But still…Telegraph: The World Bank today poured cold water on the chances of a robust recovery for the global economy next year, warning instead that the weakness of banks and rising unemployment will cast heavy shadows in 2010.The Bank also delivered a more pessimistic outlook for this year, expecting the world’s gross domestic product (GDP) to contract by a record 2.9pc. In March it had predicted a decline of 1.7pc.Although acknowledging that major economies are no longer in free fall, the World Bank is far more cautious than the International Monetary Fund about the strength of a recovery.Why aren’t they more optimistic? Because, they note correctly, this hasn’t been your normal garden-variety recession (in fact, the days of the garden-variety recession seem gone for good. All downturns going forward will put stress on areas of systemic risk and require massive government intervention). This recession has come after a financial crisis, and those tend to drag on awhile

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:04 am

I heard somewhere that stimulus money is being spent on high speed trains from a Spanish company.This will not produce American jobs. The jobs will continue to be exported because of labor arbitrage. The bleeding seems to be continuing.The money that has been spent has been hijackedby the financiers and has been shipped out to benefit the multinationals who roam the seas forcheap labor. Is anybody awake??? This will continue until we are all begging for change,albeit at higher prices. Brother can you spare a Benjamin?????

MM CAJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:04 am

Just went through annual enrollment for wife and I. our contributuons to our employer based health care coverage is now:Medical $330.00 26 $8,580.00Medical $399.00 26 $10,374.00Medical $729.00 $18,954.00Dental $36.00 26 $936.00Dental $32.00 26 $832.00Dental $68.00 $1,768.00Total $20,722.00She works for a top NorCal hospital as an RN 9over 10 years). I work for a fortune 60 company (over 20 years). it has dawned on me we should cancel all this and go get one private policy for less than what these employer sponsered insurance costs are.this is utterly ridicoulus when one considers our total contributions were around 1000.00 only 7 short years ago. now we pay almsot 20k for worse coverage, higher deductibles, dental plan that covers each for only 1500 per year.this is total Wage destruction and only reinforces what corprate America is doing to thier workers. Obama’s health plan is a joke. The insurance compnaies and health care providors are out of control with thier charges and costs. No wonder no one wants to creat jobs, and isntead jsut kill off what jobs thier are, esepcially manufactuing and send whatever is needed overseas where it is cheaper to do business and manufacture/produce goods.Report: Health care costs to rise 9% in 2010http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/health/2009-06-18-health-care-costs_N.htm?loc=interstitialskipINDIANAPOLIS (AP) — Employers who offer health insurance coverage could see a 9% cost increase next year, and their workers may face an even bigger hit, according to a report Thursday from consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers.Costs will rise in part because workers worried about losing their jobs are using their health care more while they still have it, the firm said in the report released to the Associated Press. The report also said rising unemployment is driving up medical costs.Health care reform legislation currently being hashed out in Congress likely will have little impact on next year’s costs, said PWC Principal Michael Thompson. But he noted that the intense focus on health care may slow price increases.”Nobody wants to be front page news when all the lights are shinning on your industry,” he said.The report projects the expected cost increase per person for employee benefits plans, and it factors in things such as price increases, as well as utilization changes.Businesses confronted with increases will likely pass some of the burden to employees via higher premiums, deductibles or copays, Thompson said.”If the underlying costs go up by 9%, employees’ costs actually go up by double digits,” he said, noting that will have a “major, major impact” when many employers also are freezing or cutting pay.A total of 42% of employers surveyed said they would increase employees’ share of costs.The 9% increase predicted for 2010, however, represents a slight decrease from the 9.2% PWC projected for this year, and 9.9% predicted for 2008. A growing use of generic drugs has helped tame spending, according to the most recent survey.Actual cost increases for this year and last were not available.PWC surveyed more than 500 employers and health insurers. One of the factors it found that may increase medical costs next year is the lingering threat of unemployment. Workers worried about losing their health coverage along with their jobs tend to seek medical care they might otherwise put off.PWC also said health care providers tend to shift costs to private insurance plans to make up for the revenue drop they see from a rise in the uninsured population or from an increase in the percentage of people covered by Medicaid, the state-federal insurance program for the poor.Georgetown University health economist Jean Mitchell said she sees one main reason behind any health care cost increase: overutilization. Mitchell, who was not involved with the survey, said health care costs have been rising faster than inflation because the payment system rewards care providers for doing more.”Until we fix that, we’re never going to be able to rein in health care costs,” she said.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:08 am

perhaps the additives included in gasoline have changed recently? Someone should check with the refineries…

MM CAJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:09 am

Record profits? anyone care to venture at who’s expense? this company is crimminal and should be eliminated…Goldman Prepares To Pay Biggest Bonuses Ever (GS)http://www.businessinsider.com/goldman-prepares-to-pay-biggest-bonsues-ever-2009-6Remember the days when the age of excess on Wall Street were over? We were told the new normal would mean smaller bonsues, reduced egos, no more bottle service and a New York City devastated by the loss of income trickling down from investment bankers to the rest of us.Well, Goldman may have received that memo but it didn’t care much for it. Because the big bonus is back at 85 Broad, baby.From The Guardian:Staff at Goldman Sachs staff can look forward to the biggest bonus payouts in the firm’s 140-year history after a spectacular first half of the year, sparking concern that the big investment banks which survived the credit crunch will derail financial regulation reforms.A lack of competition and a surge in revenues from trading foreign currency, bonds and fixed-income products has sent profits at Goldman Sachs soaring, according to insiders at the firm.Staff in London were briefed last week on the banking and securities company’s prospects and told they could look forward to bumper bonuses if, as predicted, it completed its most profitable year ever. Figures next month detailing the firm’s second-quarter earnings are expected to show a further jump in profits. Warren Buffett, who bought $5bn of the company’s shares in January, has already made a $1bn gain on his investment.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:19 am

yes yes yes but the Iranians are evil. That’s what it says on the back of my computer game case. It’s a …jeesh sorry I can’t remember the name of the game…

FEDupJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:31 am

Lack of transparency always leads to unequal playing field for the little guy: maybe Congress should ask Buffett what he knew about Goldman that the rest of us didn’t?

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:31 am

I have a problem.The problem is, I have not had TV for the last 5 years but yet I must determine who are more evil of the following:A. SwedishB. IraniansC. PomeraniansD. North KoreansI was going to go with North Koreans because they seem to be into the Koran (I think its the Northern version of the Koran). Or should I go with the Swedish? I think I heard something about them going on some boats to kill people in Scotland and Ireland some years back. Alternatively maybe I should choose between Iranians and Pomeranians. I always get those two mixed up so I thought I include both of them.

wethepeopleJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:46 am

More power to the Federal Reserve?????I grow numb in disbelief at the prospect of The American People, (TAP), being so ignorant or programmed as to not have the intellectual capacity to understand the grand theft being perpetrated on them. How can any proponent of consumer safety or consumer rights (our own leader)profess to give more (extra-contstitutional) regulatory authority to a private cartel, who remains cloaked in secrecy, non-transparent, un-audited, and responsible for this mess? TAP are being corralled like sheep for slaughter by those we elect and entrust to ensure our safety and freedom, the U.S. Congress and U.S. Senate. These bodies of elected officials need to be voted out of office at the earliest election. This country has been hijacked by the money lenders who own the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve should be brought to account for false, deceptive and misleading advertising itself by being allowed to claim affliation with our government by misusing the name “Federal” and alluding to “safety” by using the name “Reserve”. They reserve nothing except illegal profits from taxpayer bailouts, Goldman Sachs anyone? I agree with others today regarding this site, it has lost its vinegar. Ah, the sweet scent of compliance, we must all lay down and rest a while, in these beautiful poppies. Look not behind the curtain.

Brett in ManhattanJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:57 am

No one is allowed to ask kindly, old, Warren Buffet a tough question. For example, when Buffet wrote his famous “Buy American, I am” article in the NY Times, I seemed to be the only one interested in knowing why he was in “100% Government Bonds,” and when he took that position.By his own admission, Mr. Buy and Hold had sold out all his positions at some point before the crash.

tutterfrutJune 22nd, 2009 at 10:42 am

“I grow numb in disbelief at the prospect of The American People, (TAP), being so ignorant or programmed as to not have the intellectual capacity to understand the grand theft being perpetrated on them.”But hey, they’re queuing for the newest Iphone.It means they are hungry for instant information, 24/7 wherever they are…

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 1:12 pm

I agree with the previous guest.Totally fascinating and thank you for sharing your experience.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 1:23 pm

As long as there’s greed and obfuscation at the top levels, and as long as the people are referred to as “consumers” and encouraged to act as such in order to keep the economy going on massive amounts of debt, and as long as the government insists on propping up spending during the times when the consumer is spent (I won’t even touch on the employment issue), there can and will be no significant recovery.Removing only part of the cancer will not help much if the rest is left to grow and spread.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 3:08 pm

$BKX in trouble again, anytime now, bankers go back to Geithner and cry for more TARP asistance?

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 3:12 pm

lets violate taxpayer again, eminent systemic collapse needs TARP fund pass thru congress prompto. everyone wait in line, here is money to Goldman again, Wells Fargo, blabla…sweet :)

SoftwarengineerJune 22nd, 2009 at 3:51 pm

GOOD NEWS FOR SAVERS:From CBS Market watch today:”…Stocks tumble on bleak outlook for world economyStocks slide as World Bank slashes 2009 forecast for global economy; Dow industrials drop 201…”Deflation should now intensify as oil prices collapse. This beats stagflation slam dunk, that’s horrifying.

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 4:22 pm

tomorrow, FOMC moment will seal fate for $usd, $usb, and equity market. i bet helicopter Ben will sacrifice dollar and treasury. that is what he does all the time.

Guest :-=-_-=-:June 22nd, 2009 at 5:55 pm

@ morbid, last thread “naive, savior” etc..”The Imitatio Christi will forever have this disadvantage: we worship a man as a divine model, embodying the deepest meaning of life, and then out of sheer imitation we forget to make real the profound meaning present in ourselves.”If I accept the fact that a god is absolute and beyond all human experience, he leaves me cold. I do not affect him, nor does he affect me. But if I know, on the other hand, that God is a mighty activity within my own soul, at once I must concern myself with him.”Carl G. Jungfurther along this line is the realization thatevery external perception or manifestation hasan internal corollary and the field is rich withpossibilities and potential. and we are free todirect our energies where we see they are bestapplied!.http://meuser.awardspace.com/gmass/easter_Birthday_of_the_Gods.shtml…“The author of the Book of Ecclesiastes in the Old Testament is in the book’s very title called “The Preacher.” In ancient Egyptian religious books which dramatized the forms and stages of the divinization of man, there was a character always called “The Speaker.” He it was who played the part of the Christ-soul in the representations and in this exalted capacity uttered or pronounced the divine “sermon” preached on the “mount of earth,” meaning here in our world. He spoke the words of the Christos in his sermon to the men of earth. The “Sermon on the Mount” is just the preach-23ment of the heavenly soul in our nature to the human counterpart.”……..p.s.some people say ‘if christ were alive today hewould puke and never stop.’ i could see that. but,i think he is alive today and laughing his ass off,granted, intermittently. or..” you know there ain’t no devil, there’s just god when he’s drunk.” t.w..vivre libre ou mourir,la convention national..http://homepage.mac.com/j.norstad/paris2006/pantheon.html.Bill Morrissey wrote a song titled “Live Free or Die” about the irony of a prisoner serving time in the State of New Hampshire’s jails and hand-stamping license plates with the motto Live Free or Die. The song appeared on his first album..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Free_or_Die.it seems, from the above, many know the words buthave, as has been said, “lost the sheet music”.have not actualized or appreciated the meaning.to live, as opposed to being dead-but not yet in theground. to live free. the feeling of it?.and here a funny thing…”I read Voltaire in English translation when I was young, and I was captivated by his wit. There’s a story that on his death bed, a priest tried to get him to renounce Satan. He is reported to have said “now, now, my dear man – this is not the time to be making enemies.” How funny, and how French, is that?”sweet ( -) =X=

Guest :-=-_-=-:June 22nd, 2009 at 5:55 pm

@ morbid, last thread “naive, savior” etc..”The Imitatio Christi will forever have this disadvantage: we worship a man as a divine model, embodying the deepest meaning of life, and then out of sheer imitation we forget to make real the profound meaning present in ourselves.”If I accept the fact that a god is absolute and beyond all human experience, he leaves me cold. I do not affect him, nor does he affect me. But if I know, on the other hand, that God is a mighty activity within my own soul, at once I must concern myself with him.”Carl G. Jungfurther along this line is the realization thatevery external perception or manifestation hasan internal corollary and the field is rich withpossibilities and potential. and we are free todirect our energies where we see they are bestapplied!.http://meuser.awardspace.com/gmass/easter_Birthday_of_the_Gods.shtml…“The author of the Book of Ecclesiastes in the Old Testament is in the book’s very title called “The Preacher.” In ancient Egyptian religious books which dramatized the forms and stages of the divinization of man, there was a character always called “The Speaker.” He it was who played the part of the Christ-soul in the representations and in this exalted capacity uttered or pronounced the divine “sermon” preached on the “mount of earth,” meaning here in our world. He spoke the words of the Christos in his sermon to the men of earth. The “Sermon on the Mount” is just the preach-23ment of the heavenly soul in our nature to the human counterpart.”……..p.s.some people say ‘if christ were alive today hewould puke and never stop.’ i could see that. but,i think he is alive today and laughing his ass off,granted, intermittently. or..” you know there ain’t no devil, there’s just god when he’s drunk.” t.w..vivre libre ou mourir,la convention national..http://homepage.mac.com/j.norstad/paris2006/pantheon.html.Bill Morrissey wrote a song titled “Live Free or Die” about the irony of a prisoner serving time in the State of New Hampshire’s jails and hand-stamping license plates with the motto Live Free or Die. The song appeared on his first album..http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Free_or_Die.it seems, from the above, many know the words buthave, as has been said, “lost the sheet music”.have not actualized or appreciated the meaning.to live, as opposed to being dead-but not yet in theground. to live free. the feeling of it?.and here a funny thing…”I read Voltaire in English translation when I was young, and I was captivated by his wit. There’s a story that on his death bed, a priest tried to get him to renounce Satan. He is reported to have said “now, now, my dear man – this is not the time to be making enemies.” How funny, and how French, is that?”sweet ( -) =X=

ChristopherJune 22nd, 2009 at 6:55 pm

I heard some lady on TV the other night say that only 5% of the $787B stimulus has been spent. So, either they can’t spend it fast enough, or they are really spending it slow to see if they get a psychological pop to the economy first.Also, I remember in the bailout for New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, I saw a statistic somewhere that only 17 cents of every dollar made it to New Orleans. The other 83 cents went to management fees, etc. And, there are still billions not yet spent because of administrative red tape.The same thing could happen to the $787B stimulus. Too little and too late.

Guest :-=-_-=-:June 22nd, 2009 at 8:20 pm

http://www.identitytheory.com/visual/middlebrook_index.php….“I have a four-year-old, and I wanted her to experience nature in the same way that I did. There is nothing more important for a child than to be able to play in dirt. “.”How is the relationship between humans and the environment examined in your work?”"The point in which nature and humans collide is where I find inspiration. Natural disasters, weeds taken over a parking lot of a closed store, these are both reminders of the power of nature and man is always trying to established space within nature. People continue to build on the coast lines and then cry to the insurance companies when their houses fall in the ocean. When that house falls I see many ideas for my art.”.?

Guest :-=-_-=-:June 22nd, 2009 at 8:20 pm

http://www.identitytheory.com/visual/middlebrook_index.php….“I have a four-year-old, and I wanted her to experience nature in the same way that I did. There is nothing more important for a child than to be able to play in dirt. “.”How is the relationship between humans and the environment examined in your work?”"The point in which nature and humans collide is where I find inspiration. Natural disasters, weeds taken over a parking lot of a closed store, these are both reminders of the power of nature and man is always trying to established space within nature. People continue to build on the coast lines and then cry to the insurance companies when their houses fall in the ocean. When that house falls I see many ideas for my art.”.?

GuestJune 22nd, 2009 at 8:50 pm

Michelle, how much of this move is due to the realization of deflation vs. Inflation moves the commodity market?LB, you have called for the dollar to tank, what’s up?hlowe

Guest :-=-_-=-:June 22nd, 2009 at 9:35 pm

so,this may be a stretch but it seems by analogyas per below statement that financial marketsare where real economies go to die.or is it just me? and the country?.http://www.identitytheory.com/visual/middlebrook_index.php.“I read in an old issue of Artforum that your favorite quotation is “Museums are places where art goes to die,” said by Alan Watts. What about that quotation resonates with you? How have you explored it in your work?”"A few years back I was very interested in institutional critiques and discussions revolving around the death of art in museums. I did a few projects in museums that treated the space as a graveyard for art, a final resting place. Museums follow models that force them to protect and archive the work. I understand that this is important so future generations can view the work and appreciate it. I’m much more interested in a combination between showing current work and ideas and educating the public. I don’t think museums do enough to challenge the paradigm. Museums have pressure on them to make their board members happy like a corporation. How many times do we have to see a dead artist retrospective just so the market value of the work can remain healthy?”..i would have put that “healthy” in quotes. like that. also, this just inspired me with an idea for anart installation worthy of any fine museum. it would consist of credit cards, cash, bonds, certificates,news clippings etc. deeds, pasted on the walls anda big black and white smoke bomb that fills the roomwith a fog that nearly darkens the entire space.for safety reasons a mirror ball would hang from theceiling and emergency lighting would be required.i would want wine to be served at the entrance and exit.anyone interested in commissioning this projectcan just contact me here. or do your own installation at a museum near you.( joke of sort, i’m sure this would constitute anabuse of privilege. )sweet ( -)=X

Guest :-=-_-=-:June 22nd, 2009 at 9:35 pm

so,this may be a stretch but it seems by analogyas per below statement that financial marketsare where real economies go to die.or is it just me? and the country?.http://www.identitytheory.com/visual/middlebrook_index.php.“I read in an old issue of Artforum that your favorite quotation is “Museums are places where art goes to die,” said by Alan Watts. What about that quotation resonates with you? How have you explored it in your work?”"A few years back I was very interested in institutional critiques and discussions revolving around the death of art in museums. I did a few projects in museums that treated the space as a graveyard for art, a final resting place. Museums follow models that force them to protect and archive the work. I understand that this is important so future generations can view the work and appreciate it. I’m much more interested in a combination between showing current work and ideas and educating the public. I don’t think museums do enough to challenge the paradigm. Museums have pressure on them to make their board members happy like a corporation. How many times do we have to see a dead artist retrospective just so the market value of the work can remain healthy?”..i would have put that “healthy” in quotes. like that. also, this just inspired me with an idea for anart installation worthy of any fine museum. it would consist of credit cards, cash, bonds, certificates,news clippings etc. deeds, pasted on the walls anda big black and white smoke bomb that fills the roomwith a fog that nearly darkens the entire space.for safety reasons a mirror ball would hang from theceiling and emergency lighting would be required.i would want wine to be served at the entrance and exit.anyone interested in commissioning this projectcan just contact me here. or do your own installation at a museum near you.( joke of sort, i’m sure this would constitute anabuse of privilege. )sweet ( -)=X

London BankerJune 22nd, 2009 at 9:52 pm

I’ve learned by watching objective results. I see that the Fed is rigging the game – with the help of the primary dealers who also happen to be the major prime brokers – so that the dollar holds enough value and foreign markets are scary enough to herd the punters into Treasuries. Some coordinated selling, a few margin calls, and hey presto! another market collapses while the US outperforms.If the primary dealers/prime brokers fail, then they lose the “protection” afforded by the Fed’s secret and limitless balance sheet. If they succeed, then they all get to pay themselves huge bonuses and participate in ill-transparent funds that leverage the advance information.I’m also factoring in that the best way for the Chinese to escape from the dollar trap they are in is to support deflation in the US, which paradoxically strengthens the US dollar and US Treasuries for a time. Those Treasuries must be bought by the primary dealers regardless of whether China is buying, so the dollars must be raised from liquidations and repatriated. The process is much harsher if the Chinese aren’t buying Treasuries, but that actually contributes to the value of their existing portfolio as the flight to quality and dollar flows enhance that value.At least that’s what I see happening, although I’m not paying as close attention as I should because the day job gets in the way.

11BravoJune 23rd, 2009 at 1:15 pm

What SHOULD be next is action. Action from an aroused populace – before it is too late and our financial Ayatollahs seize the free swinging pendulum that has always protected America. When we have the foxes writing the new regulations for the hen house, our time is almost done. It is still not too late if enough of us get active.Call and write your Representatives. Tell them you are beyond FedUp! Ask them to explain to you why it is that Corporations, Unions, and PACs can make financial contributions to politicians. Tell them you thought they were supposed to be working for the citizens, not the pharmaceutical industry, or big tobacco, etc., etc. Let them know that you have come to realize that ‘Special Interests’ by definition work against the common interests, and you are tired of it.Tell them you want new campaign finance laws with teeth that will only allow registered voters to make political contributions of any kind..no Corporate money, no Union money, no PAC money – NONE.It is ridiculous that a Presidential campaign costs $1,000,000,000 and a Senate seat goes for $14,000,000. Take all these special interest, non-citizen funds out of the equation and we would get a whole new set of candidates. People who could afford to run without selling out in advance just to come up with the money. The system has morphed into something that virtually guarantees we get the worst kind of self-centered, egotistical, pandering loudmouth losers as candidates.Tell your representative that you are just about ready to vote against each and EVERY incumbent. Starting over with a clean slate of College Freshmen would probably give us better results than we are getting now.The first rallying cry should be “If you can’t vote, you can’t contribute”. If that one is not acted on, the second one should be “Throw the bums out!”This is still our country. We have loaned it to shysters. They will steal it if we don’t claim it back….and soon.Independent Contractor

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Congratulations to Edward Hugh whose EconoMonitor blog was #14 on CBNC's NetNet list of best alternative financial and economic blogs. Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.