The Latest Bear Market Sucker’s Rally is Losing Its Steam as an Onslaught of Awful Macro and Earnings News Takes Its Toll
I have been predicting for a while that the most recent bear market sucker’s rally would lose its steam and – like the previous bear market rallies in the last 18 months – US and global equities prices would head again towards new lows.
Let me now explain why…
As my work and the one of our research team at RGE Monitor predicts (we will publish later this week our 2009 Global Economic Outlook, a 75 page research piece for our clients and we recently published our US outlook) this will be the worst US recession in the last 50 years and the worst synchronized global recession in decades.
For a few weeks since late November equity markets ignored the onslaught of much worse than expected macro news (and all the new were really worse than awful) and had a nice 25% bear market sucker’s rally. But the drumbeat of terrible – and worse than expected – macro news and earnings news and financial news has finally taken a toll on the delusional market belief that the worst was over for financial markets and for equity markets and that the US and global economy would recover in the second half of 2009. So equity prices have already reversed more than half of their most recent bear market rally as the lousy macro news have finally shocked in the last week the wishful thinkers.
Indeed, the retail sales figures published today confirmed a shopped-out, saving-less and debt-burdened US consumer is now faltering as job losses, income losses, fall in home wealth, fall in equity wealth, high and rising debt and debt servicing ratios and a severe credit crunch take a severe toll on the ability of consumers to spend. And reduction in spending and deleveraging of the US consumer will take years to rebuild the savings rate of a household sector now hit by a severe shock to its net worth (as equity and home values fall while debts have been rising) and shocked in its ability to generate income as job losses mount and the unemployment rate surges.
Our research at RGE Monitor suggests that the US and global recession will continue at least all the way until Q4 of 2009 (a nasty 24 months U-shaped recession) and that the recovery in 2010-11 will be very weak with growth in the 1% range that is well below a potential of 2.75%. And we cannot rule out that a more severe L-shaped stag-deflation (as in Japan in the 1990s) will take hold. Indeed, as I argued recently:
While the odds of a systemic financial meltdown have been reduced by the actions of the Group of Seven and other economies, severe vulnerabilities remain.
The credit crunch will persist and spread beyond mortgages. Deleveraging will continue, as thousands of hedge funds — many of which will go bust — and other leveraged players are forced to sell assets into illiquid and distressed markets, thus causing price declines and driving more insolvent financial institutions out of business. Credit losses will mount as the recession deepens. And a few emerging-market economies will certainly enter a full-blown financial crisis.
So 2009 will be a painful year of global recession and further financial stresses, losses and bankruptcies. Currently, the probability of an L-shaped, stag-deflation is now rising to a third, while the probability of a severe U-shaped recession is two-thirds. Only aggressive, coordinated and effective policy actions by advanced and emerging-market countries can ensure that the global economy starts to recover — however slowly –in 2010, rather than entering a more protracted period of economic stagnation.
So while our benchmark scenarios sees a severe U-shaped global recession with very weak growth recovery in 2010 we cannot exclude the possibility of a worse outcome, i.e. an L-shaped recession that – in our view – has at least a one third probability. So the worst is ahead of us rather than behind us for the real economy and for financial markets. With my forecast of 2009 earnings per share for S&P500 firms being in the 50 to 60 dollars range and with P/E ratio likely to be in the 10 to 12 range given a severe global recession the S&P500 could bottom – at some point in 2009 – at best at a level of 720 and, in a worse scenario, as low as 500 or 600. So, the worst is indeed still ahead of us.
219 Responses to “The Latest Bear Market Sucker’s Rally is Losing Its Steam as an Onslaught of Awful Macro and Earnings News Takes Its Toll”
Miss America • January 14th, 2009 at 11:20 am
FYI – (from the other day)“Sorry I can’t give you much more on the “flow”, but the fact is there’s nothing to report. If the DOW does drop to 8,000 with Gold at 850+, I would likely advise a flip flop on assets. – By MA on 2009-01-08 14:24:16”All the best, Miss Americap.s. There are new rules on US-T fails that have come into play. This will severely handcuff lenders. (as to not impair secondary market liquidity) My initial reaction is to expect demand to go through the roof!To read more: http://www.newyorkfed.org/tmpg/pr090105c.pdf
Barbaracska • January 14th, 2009 at 11:33 am
Secundo
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:34 am
MA,sorry, I have a hard time understanding your comment. May be I did not read some of your posts. When you say flip flop, is it flip to long or neutral/short? Thanks.
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 11:46 am
If it was my money… I would be:Flip gold for equities. (not that equities are worth more… it’s just that both assets are clearly manipulated. Buy the low, sell the high. Play by their rules. This downswing will bring plenty of new propping money into the exchange. This money was already factored into Gold’s inflation. Now it will be put to use in propping.)Treasury Yields would likely go down. The value of owned T’s with higher rates become more attractive. (no risk) good to own.MAp.s. I will likely shift my 401k from the safe (mmkt/bds) to equities today.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:51 am
From a teacher in the Nashville area:We are worried about “the cow” when it is all about the “Ice Cream.”The most eye-opening civics lesson I ever had was while teaching thirdgradethis year. The presidential election was heating up and some of thechildren showed an interest. I decided we would have an election for aclass president.We would choose our nominees. They would make a campaign speech and theclass would vote.To simplify the process, candidates were nominated by other class members.We discussed what kinds of characteristics these students should have. Wegot many nominations and from those, Jamie and Olivia were picked to runforthe top spot.The class had done a great job in their selections. Both candidates weregood kids. I thought Jamie might have an advantage because he got lots ofparental support. I had never seen Olivia’s mother.The day arrived when they were to make their speeches Jamie went first. Hehad specific ideas about how to make our class a better place. He ended bypromising to do his very best. Every one applauded. He sat down andOliviacame to the podium.Her speech was concise. She said, “If you will vote for me, I will giveyouice cream.” She sat down. The class went wild. “Yes! Yes! We want icecream.”She surely would say more. She did not have to. A discussion followed.How did she plan to pay for the ice cream? She wasn’t sure. Would herparents buy it or would the class pay for it. She didn’t know. The classreally didn’t care. All they were thinking about was ice cream.Jamie was forgotten. Olivia won by a land slide.Every time Barack Obama opens his mouth he offers ice cream and sixtypercent of the people react like nine year olds. They want ice cream. Theother forty percent know they’re going to have to feed the cow and clean upthe mess.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:56 am
Stocks running hard North now. They heard you MA.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:57 am
MA, why are you willing to expose your 401K given Nouriels analysis above? Is this a long-term play now or are you just “managing” your 401K?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:01 pm
In this sea of misinformation from all corners of the financial industry, once again Professor Roubini takes pains to paint the picture as it is and not as the false picture the prophets and reporters would like us to see. In this way, the Professor’s approach, in the finest tradition of straight talk, helps us plan our lives and investments around something solid, the truth
JimmyTheBanker • January 14th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
How big of a prop-job are you looking for MA?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:08 pm
Sellers/shorts washed out? Looks like market ready to move “markedly” higher
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
How long will it be before columnist Bob Scheer admits that the Obama money team (Summers, Rubin, Geithner) that he routinely criticizes, doesn’t really work for this shining new head of state? Instead, they all represent the banker power brokers behind the curtain. Anyway, here’s Scheer’s latest:“A bailout run by those got us in” | by Robert Scheer (SF Chronicle)January 14, 2009 — Why rush to throw another $350 billion of taxpayer money at the Wall Street bandits and their political cronies who created the biggest financial mess since the Great Depression? And why should we taxpayers be expected to double our debt exposure when the 10 still-secret bailout contracts made in the first round are being kept from the public?We don’t have time, President-elect Barack Obama’s key economic adviser Lawrence Summers insisted in a letter to Congress on Monday, promising that the new infusion would not be squandered as was the first installment. But given that Summers is personally as responsible for this meltdown as anyone, why should we trust him on this? Yes, it sounds wonderfully bipartisan that Obama is backing President Bush’s request for spending the money now, short-circuiting congressional inquiry, but it was just that sort of bipartisan politics that created this nightmare.How insulting that we must now accept Summers’ assurance that the Obama administration will “move quickly to reform a weak and outdated regulatory system to better protect consumers, investors and businesses.” This from the guy who, as President Bill Clinton’s Treasury secretary, pushed the deregulation legislation making the subsequent financial crimes of Wall Street legal. The “toxic derivatives” that we taxpayers are now forced to purchase from the Wall Street hustlers were deliberately shielded from all government regulation, thanks to the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which Summers got Congress to pass in the closing days of the Clinton administration with the same urgency that he now pushes for the new Wall Street handout.Back then, Summers was a disciple of Robert Rubin, who just last week resigned from his director’s position at Citigroup, the financial conglomerate that grew to unmanageable and corrupt proportions thanks to the empowering legislation that Rubin initiated when he was Clinton’s first treasury secretary. Rubin has been paid more than $115 million plus stock options at Citigroup, and despite his horrid record is still a close Obama adviser. It is one of the great swindles of U.S. financial history that Citigroup was bailed out with $45 billion in a deal that could eventually cost taxpayers an additional $269 billion to guarantee those toxic assets that would have been illegal if not for the legislation backed by Rubin and Summers.How did Obama allow himself to become ensnared with the very same folks who are the most culpable? His Treasury secretary nominee, Timothy Geithner, is another Rubin protégé who, as head of the New York Fed, worked tirelessly with Rubin to concoct the Citigroup bailout. When candidate Obama gave his major economic address on March 27, he couldn’t have been clearer in condemning the deregulation that Rubin and Summers had engineered:”Unfortunately, instead of establishing a 21st century regulatory framework, we simply dismantled the old one – aided by a legal but corrupt bargain in which campaign money all too often shaped policy and watered down oversight. In doing so, we encouraged a winner-take-all, anything-goes environment that helped foster devastating dislocations in our economy.”He was referring to the deregulation legislation that Summers hailed on the day that Clinton signed it into law as “a major step forward to the 21st century.” Now he is relying on Summers to reverse a disaster of his own creation. It’s like returning to the same surgeon who almost killed the patient in the first operation to once again cut open the body to repair the damage.What we need is a second opinion.Where is the openness and accountability that Obama promised? Why not pause for a few weeks for congressional hearings on how to spend the new money? We don’t even know where the last batch went. On Monday, the Treasury Department finally agreed, only after a subpoena threat, to turn over to Sen. Carl Levin and his Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations the 10 secret contracts that it had signed with top Wall Street firms in the first round of the bailout. Unfortunately, an aide to Levin was quoted in the New York Times as saying the subcommittee has no plans to make those contracts public.That is outrageous. This is our money we’re talking about. Why don’t we get to read the fine print in what will end up being trillions of dollars in our future obligations? Because we are suckers, that’s why, and the folks who swindled us into this disaster can count on it.http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/01/14/EDBL159HQ4.DTL&feed=rss.opinion
economicminor • January 14th, 2009 at 12:10 pm
Citigroup Crisis Is Emblem of Capital Drought
an. 14 (Bloomberg) — Time and again, big banks such as Citigroup Inc. argued that irrational and seized-up markets, not the woeful state of their balance sheets, were to blame for convulsing share prices.For more than 18 months, the government went along with that thinking. Instead of demanding that banks recognize their losses, overhaul operations and quickly raise equity from private sources, regulators bet a flood of money would unclog credit markets.When that didn’t work, the government doled out billions of dollars to more than 100 banks through the Troubled Assets Relief Program, or TARP, again with few demands that banks take harsh medicine. That hasn’t done the trick either.The reason is pretty simple. This has never been a liquidity crisis. It’s a capital crisis. Namely, investors don’t think banks have enough of it, especially when it comes to tangible common equity.
“The reason is pretty simple. This has never been a liquidity crisis.” No shit, it has been an insolvency crisis! Finally the realization is dawning upon some that we’ve been lied to and taken advantage of by Big Ben and Hanky Panky as the mouth pieces of the financial industry that has all along been insolvent and is things are getting worse…So how are we going to fix this? Give the idiots who caused the biggest financial crisis in at least recent history more money to play with and let them keep their bonuses and perks?Good idea in an insane asylum!
JimmyTheBanker • January 14th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Seattle FHLB Likely Short of Capital on Mortgage Debt (Update4)Email | Print | A A ABy Jody ShennJan. 13 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle said it will suspend dividends and “excess” stock repurchases, becoming the second of the government-chartered lending cooperatives to say its capital may be running low.The likely capital shortfall as of Dec. 31 was caused by “unrealized market value losses” on residential mortgage bonds without government backing, the bank said in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing today. Washington Mutual Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. had been the biggest stakeholders and borrowers in the Seattle Federal Home Loan Bank, or FHLB.Seattle joins the San Francisco FHLB in taking steps to guard its reserves after the U.S. housing market collapse sent mortgage-backed bonds tumbling. The declines may leave as many as eight of the 12 FHLBs below capital requirements, Moody’s Investors Service has said, eroding a below-market rate source of about $1 trillion in financing for Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and other companies that participate in the cooperatives.“Systemic weakness in the FHLBs, which may require federal action, could have a number of implications for U.S. banks and thrifts, including: higher costs of FHLB borrowings, reduced value of FHLB stock, and increased demand for alternative sources of liquidity,” Frederick Cannon, an analyst at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in San Francisco, wrote in the report to clients yesterday.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
The bailed-out banks, flush with our stimulus funds, should have no problem re-conditioning their balance sheets. As in the previous depression, when prices start dropping like flies, they’ll use our cash to buy up assets at fire sale prices or less.
Hubbs • January 14th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
CNBC covering Madoff’s car ride to bail appeal with all the fanfare of the OJ car chase. CNBC has lost what little respect I had. They should make a deal with Geraldo Rivera to cover this.Did not renew my WSJ subscription. Terminating my cable TV service (didn’t deliver Bloomberg) and switching to Dish.In fact, this RGE blog has provided me with a much broader and insightful analysis of current financial events.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
during these last two years of the bush regime i’ve read articles saying the mess we are in is a result of putting an inexperienced george bush in office even though he is from a family that has directly and indirectly controlled this country for over a quarter century.so why has america now put in office a complete novice?
ALNB • January 14th, 2009 at 12:21 pm
What Obama is offering is a REASONED approach to survival. That will make a welcome change from the wilful ignorance of the past eight years. Will he succeed? We had better hope so. It was Bush who gave us nothing but ice cream, and now we are ill from malnutrition.
economicminor • January 14th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
No Dorothy, we aren’t in Kansas any more!We’ll go find the wizard and he’ll help us get home!Calculated Risk – Retail Sales Collapse in DecemberThis graph from CR shows the year-over-year change in nominal and real retail sales since 1993.
To calculate the real change, the monthly PCE price index from the BEA was used (December PCE prices was estimated as the same as November).Although the Census Bureau reported that nominal retail sales decreased 10.2% year-over-year (retail and food services decreased 9.8%), real retail sales declined by 11.3% (on a YoY basis). This is the largest YoY decline since the Census Bureau started keeping data.There is the Census Bureau report:
The U.S. Census Bureau announced today that advance estimates of U.S. retail and food services sales for December, adjusted for seasonal variation and holiday and trading-day differences, but not for price changes, were $343.2 billion, a decrease of 2.7 percent (±0.5%) from the previous month and 9.8 percent (±0.7%) below December 2007. Total sales for the 12 months of 2008 were down 0.1 percent (±0.4%)* from 2007. Total sales for the October through December 2008 period were down 7.7 percent (±0.5%) from the same period a year ago. The October to November 2008 percent change was revised from -1.8 percent (±0.5%) to -2.1 percent (±0.3%).Retail trade sales were down 2.7 percent (±0.5%) from November 2008 and were 10.8 percent (±0.7%) below last year. Gasoline stations sales were down 35.5 percent (±1.5%) from December 2007 and motor vehicle and parts dealers sales were down 22.4 percent (±2.3%) from last year.Retail sales are a key portion of consumer spending and real retail sales have fallen off a cliff.
CR says it pretty good.
economicminor • January 14th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
Not going to happen as the residential deflation isn’t over and they are just starting to face the CRE collapsing. And they have a lot of unsecuritized loans too… Student, auto, credit card…They need much more to stay afloat and with everyone else in the world in decline and or deficits, the dollars will just have to be printed (monetized).Few have real cash… most have debt which they thought was as good as cash.ORInterest rates need to go up a lot…Both will have devastating affects.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
You don’t get it do you? ALL politicians throughout history have fed us all ice cream. That is why the dollar is down some 90% since the Fed was created. THey have been ripping us off unfettered and will continue to do so becuase we allow it. Political classifications are meaningless. A politician is a politician. Stop blaming others for what you/I allow.
Shalom Hoffman • January 14th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
To Prof’ Roubini:I find one important issue not being sufficiently detailed in your ‘best of breed’ reasoning and insightful analysis and comprehension of this historic crisis, and this is the deleveraging process the financial system is undergoing. There needs to be, in my opinion, a constant watch and a QUANTIFIED ASSESSMENT of where are we standing in this long and painful process. Like the housing bottoming this is of paramount importance in assessing the flow of money in the economy, the depth and the time span of the recession, as well as the quality and pace of the recovery.With all my gratefulness and appreciation for Prof’ Roubini.Shalom HoffmanIsrael
Fred • January 14th, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Nouriel Roubini is the man. Thank you so much Mr. Roubini for allowing free access to this information. I have been amazed by its accuracy.–Fredhttp://www.acclaiminvesting.com
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:42 pm
Yeah, welcome to the new DIY media. Everyone brings their virtual clippings to show-and-tell with commentary on the significance. Using decades of experience as reality filter, participants quickly toss distractors and focus on relevant issues.Now if only the Obama dream team would read NR’s blog and learn.
Disbelief • January 14th, 2009 at 12:47 pm
“both assets are clearly manipulated”What’s your evidence?
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
Nouriel’s posts have nothing to do with my views. His posts aren’t meant as investment guides for timing the market. They are broad macro views. (which I tend to agree with) In the world of RvR, following the flow, or timing the market, I see 8,000 as the typical buying line for long termers. (if you’re day trading, the short term has potential to get ugly, but i tend to say that all assets have a similar “ugly” look. …and if that’s the case, where do you think “support” will flow to?)Just my opinion.MA
CLS • January 14th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
Ice cream is what got Bush elected. His form of ice cream was low taxes. I wonder how the people who voted for him are enjoying eating their ice cream.
JimmyTheBanker • January 14th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
This was the largest YOY drop in retail sales since my data began in January 1965. This moves my Q4 GDP estimate to a drop of 8%!!!! This also moves my earnings growth estimate for 2009 over 2008 to DROP of 16% in S&P earnings YOY. This puts fair value today on the S&P500 at 673. MissAmerica, you still wanna go long here?
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 12:57 pm
@ disbelief….Um…. Where have you been? Did you not know that our official have openly talked about buying equities. (In addition, with fixed income, swaping non-performing debt for performing debt (or credit) is blatant manipulation???)My gold manipulation is technically speculative. …but based on my past accuracy, I suspect that I’m basically right. (there is a broad disconnect between street value and market value, and the players/market makers in the Market value are the same players who rely on access to credit from banks. …which tightens on downswings due to recaps/margins/etc)MA
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Whoa, shocking graph. Retail sales off a cliff.
ALA • January 14th, 2009 at 12:59 pm
Because Americans still believe that the one party system can work, Republicans and Democrats are both one in the same. To vote for either is a wasted vote and is asking for more of the same forever and ever, the brainwashing power of our collages and news media has betrayed us all. Just look at all the wasteful spending and etc, etc, etc,.. from both parties then look at how long we choose to keep these people in office/ power, it is corrupt by any measure. We look at these two parties as if they are our only choice or hope never electing someone different as that would be suicide. It will only change when we change our thinking. Maybe Hillary will run and win in four years or maybe Jeb Bush who knows or cares except those brain washed drones that only care about their party affiliation. Our Election Day mantra should be your Dammed if you do and you are dammed if you don’t.
Octavio Richetta • January 14th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
The Professor has been far more accurate and reliable in calling the market than the WS pundits (This is usually not the case for the dismal scientists who usually have a dismal record of forecasting the market short/medium term – e.g., Shiller, Shilling. Take for instance the “Knights” of the Barron’s Round Table. I read the score card for their 2008 recommendations last Saturday. What can I tell you? If their lives depended on it, these fellows would all be dead by now, including Faber and Gross. Go ahead and take a look it is a public link:http://online.barrons.com/public/article/SB123156273219070849.html?mod=b_hps_article-outset-boxWhy does such a mediocre level of performance commands such a high pay?On the current market, I have no idea how long the market rout will last, whether we may have a dead cat bounce; but if I had to pick a scenario, I would say that the action today is still VERY FAR from reflecting the information conveyed by the dismal Xmas retail sales and that we are headed even lower. I almost sold my SPY 88 feb puts at a 26% gain but decided to wait.
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 1:06 pm
About the same as before! …but I do speculate that the pressure will ratchet up a notch… As the botom 99% tighten our belts at a pace that the current stimulus can’t cover.Trust me, I’M VERY PREPARRED TO SHIFT BACK TO “SAFE”, AND WILL POST WHEN I SEE THE BOUNCE TURNING (for the day traders) …or when I’m no longer comfortable with an 8,000 average as a bottom (for the long termers).I’m not 100% accuarate!…but I have been WAAAAAAAY ahead of the curve on most calls and market timing over the past few years. (Other posters here could probably vouch for my calls?)MA
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Well, this oughta turn stocks North!!! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHALOLOLOLOL2:00 p.m.No signs of upturn through early Jan.: Fed Beige Book2:00 p.m.Overall activity ‘continues to weaken,’ Beige Book2:00 p.m.Layoffs and hiring freezes are common: Beige Book2:00 p.m.Lending activity continues to decline: Beige Book2:00 p.m.Fed sees weak residential and commercial real estate
CM • January 14th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
BOOOMMM! Right on schedule! Huge pop in SSO!
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
WOW!! BOOM is right!
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
LOLOL SSO up almost 2% in last 4 minutes!
hazleton • January 14th, 2009 at 1:11 pm
@MAYour calls are counterintuitive but often right. I just have trouble throwing money into this market.
Amar Harolikar • January 14th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Same suckers rally happening right now in Indian Stock Markets based on similar sentiments as the US markets ..! I really doubt if it will sustain tomorrow given the drop in Dow today.India is following the US economy with a 3-6 months lag. The prevalent thinking in Indian markets is that things will get bad but probably not too bad. That was where US was 3-6 months back. I am sure the next couple of months will be a shock.Amar Harolikarhttp://taxationindia.blogspot.com/
Disbelief • January 14th, 2009 at 1:14 pm
MA,Given that you are an analyst on this web site, I find it disconcerting that you would state an opinion as a fact, with your rationale for stating it as such being your “past accuracy” (also known as “hindsight bias”). Insofar as the equity markets are concerned, it’s doubtful they could truly be manipulated on anything more than the shortest of terms, if even that. They are too vast and complex to be truly manipulated.
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
I caught it at 23.02 and out .13
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
“They” have to reverse this. You can’t have markets melting down and near the lows on the Presidents inauguration…can you???
CM • January 14th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
They are gonna run this green today aren’t they…anyone else have that sick feeling?
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
If MA is going long equities today – we have already seen the lows (for now) -
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
@ disbeliefIt’s about access to credit. That’s how the markets are manipulated. I’ve stated it, and detailed it out 2 years ago. When the valves shut, the credit dries. when they open, buying comes in. When a trading desk has money, they buy!…and my calls have NEVER BEEN IN HINDSIGHT!
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 1:22 pm
I’m big on equities in the 401k world. This is money that’s locked in.In the world of straight up investing… I’d rather have cash.For those gold bugs, I’d do the swap I spoke of (especially where I had set a $850 sell line a while ago on the website.)
Anonymous • January 14th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
This is simply not true. Don’t try to push your own disillusionment with the process on everyone else. If some parts of society weren’t fixated on fighting a continual culture war, willfully blinding the masses (who admittedly are easily led astray) from the underlying truths, we wouldn’t be in this mess.And since the new administration hasn’t even started yet, maybe you should put down that crystal ball and start rubbing your eyes.
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
@ disbelief,I’d like you to prove that markets can’t be manipulated through access to credit.You’re welcome to your own opinion.I believe I have validated mine over the past few years here. …and as I stated: “if it were my money” and “I’m not 100% accurate”Take my words as nothing more than 1 person’s “OPINION”.
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 1:30 pm
about to turn up again
molly • January 14th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
GuestThe reason is the same as that which convinces us to put various noxious chemicals on our heads even though it is only a few millimeters from our brains – advertising/ brainwashing.
Disbelief • January 14th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
MA,It’s not that your calls are in hindsight, it’s that your memory of your calls and their accuracy has a bias. You believe you were more correct than you actually were.Sorry, but I don’t believe you have any franchise on calling the market correctly, whatever market it happens to be. Irrespective of your purported market calling and timing talents, stating conjecture as fact takes away from the credibility of the site.
Guy • January 14th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Dear Professor,Looking ahead, I fear you are too optimistic. The GOA’s recent report is that the economy will not recover it’s robustness until 2015. That’s not to say we will be in a no-growth period until then, just lower than average growth that will feel like no growth. Productivity is declining and will remain weak as we slowly pull out of this serious recession.
Charles • January 14th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Faber’s picks look pretty good. He was short and right on many picks.- Charles
nik og jay • January 14th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
alan greenspan was very experienced and look at the good that did.
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
How come Bush isn’t telling us that everything is OK and that we should feel OK to go out and go shopping? (he’s still the Prez)Worked the last time, didn’t it?Mark
pa • January 14th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
i thought fear / “risk” got Mr. bush elected then they went back to eating ice cream …
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Article referring to U.S. gov’t market manipulation from Oct 06Hank Paulson, the market-wise Treasury Secretary who built a $700m fortune at Goldman Sachs, is re-activating the ‘plunge protection team’ (PPT), a shadowy body with powers to support stock index, currency, and credit futures in a crash.Otherwise known as the working group on financial markets, it was created by Ronald Reagan to prevent a repeat of the Wall Street meltdown in October 1987.Mr Paulson says the group had been allowed to languish over the boom years. Henceforth, it will have a command centre at the US Treasury that will track global markets and serve as an operations base in the next crisis.The top brass will meet every six weeks, combining the heads of Treasury, Federal Reserve, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and key exchanges.Mr Paulson has asked the team to examine “systemic risk posed by hedge funds and derivatives, and the government’s ability to respond to a financial crisis”.”We need to be vigilant and make sure we are thinking through all of the various risks and that we are being very careful here. Do we have enough liquidity in the system?” he said, fretting about the secrecy of the world’s 8,000 unregulated hedge funds with $1.3trillion at their disposal.The PPT was once the stuff of dark legends, its existence long denied. But ex-White House strategist George Stephanopoulos admits openly that it was used to support the markets in the Russia/LTCM crisis under Bill Clinton, and almost certainly again after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.”They have an informal agreement among major banks to come in and start to buy stock if there appears to be a problem,” he said.”In 1998, there was the Long Term Capital crisis, a global currency crisis. At the guidance of the Fed, all of the banks got together and propped up the currency markets. And they have plans in place to consider that if the stock markets start to fall,” he said.The only question is whether it uses taxpayer money to bail out investors directly, or merely co-ordinates action by Wall Street banks as in 1929. The level of moral hazard is subtly different.
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
I’m with ya Jimmy. MA does some great work, but I just don’t see things pulling up, even in the long-term. The above graph in the CR posting tells it all- retail, which, along with finance is the backbone of the US economy (never should have been, but that’s the hand that we’re currently staring at) is heading toward the big abyss.The current system is dead. The goods being produced are too expensive, on top of being worthless (for sure in the future)! The equalizing of wages around the globe are forcing all this crap out, and what we’ll find is that the system only exists because of this crap!Mark
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Don’t worry, “they” are still making lots of money (and will continue to)!Mark
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:12 pm
@ ALNB: “What Obama is offering is a REASONED approach to survival. That will make a welcome change from the wilful ignorance of the past eight years. Will he succeed? We had better hope so. It was Bush who gave us nothing but ice cream, and now we are ill from malnutrition.”but…@ Guest: “You don’t get it do you? ALL politicians throughout history have fed us all ice cream…”however…@ Anonymous: “And since the new administration hasn’t even started yet, maybe you should put down that crystal ball and start rubbing your eyes.”to which I reply….Au contraire. The new administration HAS started. An Obama financial team representing the people responsible for the current financial mess has already announced its bailout thievery to wide enthusiasm from the great agent of change. President-elect Obama, not allowing the slightest mumble to escape his lips concerning the Gaza War, has had press conferences, threats, promises, details, and unusual enthusiasm for a financial program not unlike the failed economic programs of the great Keynesians of yore. And as the same robbers come back into office, Obama warns of the same to continue while demanding more sacrifice from the people.Anyone who is still fighting the demise of America along the same old partisan lines is a part of the problem. And, at this moment in history, with the debauched Bush team lying and leaving and the debauched Clinton team almost to the last man and woman reinstated in the White House, this is hardly the moment to start praising politicians.
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
@ disbelief,”it’s that your memory of your calls and their accuracy has a bias. You believe you were more correct than you actually were.”Talk about stating conjecture as fact.My calls here have been time stamped, and reposted time and again. I’ve been extrodinarily detailed, giving specific $ ranges and dates! I’m begging you to go through the archives. Use your search tools and “miss america” or “rich h”. My market calls here and timing are historic! If you have been here for long, and read the blogs religiously… you would know that as FACT!So prove me wrong.I don’t know why I am wasting my time?(I get nothing for this and am not selling a book.)
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Roubini’s saying (possibly) a 1% growth rate in 2010-2011. If historical average is 2.75% then there’s a 1.75% margin to spread out over another 3 to 4 years (2015). If under 2.75% the economy is stated as being under-performing, recessionary. I don’t believe, then, that Roubini’s forecast can be said to differ significantly from the GAO’s.Mark
JLC • January 14th, 2009 at 2:16 pm
No, it is basically true. Read some “unsterilized” history. Or keep your blinders on. Whatever suits you best.
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 2:17 pm
Bingo!Mark
Disbelief • January 14th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Guest,Thank you. I’ve seen various references to and articles about the PPT. If they are effective at manipulating markets, why are we in this mess?
Disbelief • January 14th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
MA,I have no interest in going through all your archives and I don’t need to to know that neither you nor anyone else can predict the market, i.e., predict the future. It’s just not possible. Warren Buffet can’t do it; Nassim Nicholas Taleb can’t do it; you can’t do it.Surely you get something from this, perhaps ego satisfaction if nothing else.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
“And yes, I figured this all out on my own, and posted it to a blog, where anyone with the same viewpoint can cheer, and anyone who doesn’t can ignore.”Ron Paul lost, get over it.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
If they are effective at manipulating markets, why are we in this mess?Two points:1. No method of manipulation is foolproof (actually, very few things in life are foolproof). This is the only thing that gives me hope, though–that they cannot win out against the forces of the market forever.2. Also, your question assumes that this current ‘mess’ was something ‘they’ wanted to avoid. However, sometimes, people purposefully create situations in order to introduce ‘solutions’ which benefit them in some way. Do I have proof that this is what is happening? No. But neither do I know for certain that this is not happening. I do, however, feel that if this is the case (and we will never know for sure), that it developed faster and deeper than was intended.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
There was this NON SEQUITUR cartoon by Wiley Miller this week — THE ETERNAL BROKER.This broker has just come down a big chute straight into Hell. He’s standing in a ground of flames with his hands on his hips in front of Satan and has a big satisfied smile on his face while the great Satan reexamines his judgment scroll of bad deeds:“Oh…” nods Satan. “I stand corrected.“This still won’t affect collecting your bonus.”
ex VRWC • January 14th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
The setup for the bext back-room bailout I am predicting: TARP Funds likely to be releasedEquities down, banks in increasingly serious trouble. New infusion of capital to banks on the way. More lip service on a ‘bailout for Main St’. Pols talking about how credit flow is the lifeblood of the economy.The last handouts to the crooks are being set up, before they blow town and leave the ‘real economy’ with an unmitigated disaster in their wake. The men and the crew are taking the lifeboats. The women and children are being shoved aside. And we sit here and debate the market direction and how to make money from it.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Well the PPT, if it exists, isn’t very effective is it!!
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:37 pm
The politicians are not the problem. The corporatism behind them that has perfected a system of manipulating the policies of the governmental apparatus is.Make corporations non-persons, and watch what happens.
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
totally agree – bail out weekend coming up
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
Gannett’s Dubow, Most Workers to Take Unpaid LeaveJan. 14 (Bloomberg) — Gannett Co., the largest U.S. newspaper publisher, said it will make most of its U.S. employees, including Chief Executive Officer Craig Dubow, take one week of unpaid leave this quarter to help save money.The McLean, Virginia-based company is asking its union workers to participate in the unpaid-leave program, Dubow, 54, said today in a memo to employees.“A furlough program would be the fairest and least intrusive way to meet these fiscal challenges in the first quarter,” Dubow, who had a salary of $1.2 million in 2007, said in the memo. “We sincerely hope this minimizes the need for any layoffs going forward.”The company, publisher of USA Today, the largest-circulation U.S. newspaper, has cut jobs and trimmed print editions after publishing revenue slipped 14 percent in October and November. Gannett said on Dec. 10 that 2008 sales probably plunged 8.1 percent…Gannett fell 45 cents, or 5.6 percent, to $7.62 at 12:44 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares had declined 76 percent in the past 12 months before today.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ablMag.Tf4TM&refer=home
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
I didn’t vote for Paul…Facts are still facts: Obama (as was McCain) is totally in the pockets of the status-quo big-system folks who are going to lead us all over the edge. Have fun getting over THAT!Mark
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Well said MA.
aerial view • January 14th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
also agree- I find it quite interesting and suspicious that many of the lenders such as BofA, Citi, etc have been continually delaying settlements on short sales of homes perhaps to make their balance sheets appear as dismal as possible in order to push for the dispensing of the last $350 billion!
economicminor • January 14th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Just a note about one of our trading partners and funder of our Treasury auctions…It was Rubin and Summers who got us on the variable interest marry-go-round with our national debt.And of course it is that team who is helping the new Pres with the help of FED insider Tim G who doesn’t think he has to pay the same taxes as you do nor does he think there is any thing wrong hiring undocumented workers… That way he can keep his income up and his expenses down…Good kind of people to be running the monetay system… Don’t you think!
More firms go bankrupt in Japan Company bankruptcies in Japan jumped 24.7% in December from a year earlier, as the financial crisis pummelled the world’s second-largest economy.Data from research firm Tokyo Shoko showed that 1,362 companies filed for bankruptcy last month.A total of 33 publicly traded companies went out of business in 2008, the most in the post-war period, it said.For 2008 as a whole, corporate bankruptcies rose 11% – the most in eight years.Japanese companies, like their competitors in many parts of the world, have struggled as the recession has hit sales and made it harder to raise funds.Property firms, such as apartment builder Dia Kensetsu Co, have been particularly hard hit by the downturn. They account for about half of all the failures of listed companies.Japan’s economy slipped into its first recession in seven years in the third quarter of last year.Exports have fallen sharply as demand for Japanese products, such as cars, has fallen sharply.
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 3:40 pm
@ disbeliefIf your only “prediction” is that “neither you nor anyone else can predict the market, i.e., predict the future” …then all I can say is: You are a FOOL.What we do is make calculated assumptions. We “PROJECT” the future! …and some people are better then it then others. That’s how you become Warren Buffet!What separates me from them is that I’ve been doing this for a relatively short time and I haven’t made a name for myself within the industry. …but I PROJECT that to change based on my unique methodology, knowledge and calculations.…and until you make some “predictions” of your own, and have the intestinal fortitude to stand behind what you say, then stop throwing darts at those that do. (let alone the ones who have actually called this thing right.)In addition, do not discount my memory of my calls or their accuracy/timing without being willing to prove me wrong! (which you will not be able to do easily!) Both have been far too accurate (and like I said “time stamped” and often with “details”).Like I said earlier, if all you can do is bring clichés like “no one can predict the future”, then I suggest you crawl back into your hole as you’ve added nothing to this sight intellectually or financially.As for my motivation, which you also wrongly assumed… It is purely to help others. I see way to many people that are stressed out or have lost their savings. I try to help. (it’s the same reason I give up my lunches to work at a soup kitchen) If you knew me, you’d realize that I’m the guy that actually shows up on moving day! I’m the guy that tried to get rid of drugs from baseball, in hopes that it would trickle down into other sports, and thus trickle down through colleges and high schools… thus SAVING HUNDREDS OF LIVES! (…and yet there were idiots out there that thought I was trying to profit off of this?!?!?)In life, there are givers and takers. Guess which one I am?Miss America
MA • January 14th, 2009 at 3:53 pm
@ markI’m with you on the doom and gloom. I’ve been in the “it’s really bad camp” for a while. A month ago I stated that it was set to get much worse in a very short amount of time. (what I was focus in on with the point of an arrow was primarily retail) It actually hasn’t been as bad as I suspected. With that in mind, you need to take into serious consideration that worldwide stimulus efforts.They prop the markets. Thus causing the “disconnect” they I talk about so much. It’s a “gutting” of the economy… and the disconnect between the real (retail/wage/jobs economy) and the fake (DOW/S&P) is necessary or otherwise your MF, Pension, Institutional will be forced to massively restructure. (which in turn really disrupts the market further)I’m only promoting equities for 401k (locked money) and over gold (which was at my $850 sell line)….otherwise, I’d say stay away with your liquid assets. …unless you’re “long term” investing.Miss America
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
@teacherThat was precious.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
I wonder, I wonder, what the Bilderbergers are doing these days…
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
g,making and coordinating their shopping lists.
Mark • January 14th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
@MAYes, I kind of caught your more recent swing and felt that you’ve just about arrived
I actually think that retail did much worse than I thought given that it was the pinnacle point of the season- who wants to disappoint little Johnny?Seems that there’s a clear pattern and it’s indicating a really steep decline. Unlike the GD I think in this one the general economy is going to absolutely crash equities: in a way, the GD was the other way round. At any rate, the real economy is toast.I’ve got my 401k in CDs: have had for some time. I figure that I’ll pull completely out as/when my income drops out: avoid being jacked up to another tax bracket. I’d worked hard for what I have and I don’t have enough to gamble on the short term
)
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Anyone knows when the store is opening?
Lord Sidcup • January 14th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
where is outerbeltway gone?
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
US Negotiating More Aid for Bank of America, WSJ Reports; Shares Fall 5% to 52-Week Low in Late Trading (story developing)
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
I was wondering that too
slf • January 14th, 2009 at 4:44 pm
..surprise, surprise..
tutterfrut • January 14th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Bank of Americaid
Hayes • January 14th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
@CMIf you are out there – interesting experience today/yesterday — trading SSO. II discovered just a short while ago that in my haste instead of doing a buy/sell in one of my rapid trades yesterday — I did a buy/buy — there are alot of bad words echoing off my office walls right about now – as I’m sitting on a serious amount of shares — I sure hope MA’s track record proves to be correct in going long equities cause I am way long in this market. f
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Jack Bogle speaks. Worth listening to. 2 possible outcomes-high taxes or high inflation.http://www.howestreet.com/index.php?pl=/goldradio/index.php/mediaplayer/1080
painter • January 14th, 2009 at 5:17 pm
wheres Carl Marx when you need him
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Ridiculous. 600 FOR S and P is the likely bottom, and given the chance of an over-correction, 0 is not completely impossible. Why would you rather not buy at 600 than now? And, suppose, the small probability that 8000 on the dow is indeed the bottom, then what is wong with buying at 8300, 8400 knowing that it is a bull rally rather than buying at 8000 knowing that its likely to go around 6000, 6500
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
g,no. but when you hear gnashing of teeth, our teeth, and you see grown men openly crying in the street then the store with no doors will be open.i would look to plywood sales. if you see sheets of 3/4 inch 4 by 8 plywood sales jump with no local building boom the sale is ready to begin? or vendors getting permits to sell baked goods at the courthouse steps on auction day mornings.or when you see what appear to be perfectly good automobiles stranded in front of vacant houses.or if you notice you have no trouble parking anywhere and traffic is so light you can make u turns in the middle of town at high noon and there is no one there to notice. the store is open.when all/most the stores are closed, the store will be open. ?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
Now is the time to pull the plug. No more bail-outs, no more stimulus packages, let all the excesses weed out and this country will emerge a lot stronger because of it. Let the banks fail and, come long-term, industry prevail. If the whole banking system is bankrupt, so be it. Let all the private stakeholders come together and sort their problems out, and if they don’t, too bad for all of them individually. This is also an opportunity to end the concentration of power in the few.
kilgores • January 14th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
It is because purported experience has failed us for the past eight years or more. Sometimes a clean slate and a fresh perspective is more important than anything else. Mr. Obama projects an innate sense of good judgment and fair play that inspires confidence, if only because it contrasts so sharply with the hubris, arrogance, and excessive bravado of the current administration and its manifest incompetence in virtually every area of governance.SWK
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 6:30 pm
The funny thing is that Obama centered his whole campaign against what he called “trickle-down” economics, that bolstering the rich and thereby making the underprevileged better-off style capitalism had failed. Right now, he seems even more clueless than Bush, trying to assuage everyone– at the expense of whom?– and more importantly, demonstates an unconditional love for wall street. What I find ridiculous is the hypocrisy in his speeches, he proposes outright lies such as how different he would be from Bush and company, yet he is pursuing Bush-style capitalism more forcefully than even Bush perhaps even ever envisaged. Although I don’t doubt Obama’s intentions, but what bothers me is his insecurity in the sense that he feels compelled to satisfy everyone after all the promises he has made and he feels he would be letting segments of society down if he didn’t live up to their expectations. In fact I have come out with a lot more respect for Republicans after all is said and done, at least they have shown more principle and character. Moreover, it seems to me that the neoconservative base among republicans is actually much more “commune”-oriented, fascist than even the most liberal democrats, or even socialists, whereas normal and saner republucanism as espoused by people like Ron Paul has been totally sidelined from the mainstream republican thought by the neoconservatives. What we really need is more republicans like Ron Paul to come forward and stop this wall-street–goverment orgy.
Jason B • January 14th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
His track record is 100%.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Michael Shaoul and Timothy Brackett, analysts at New York- based institutional brokerage Oscar Gruss & Son Inc., warned that investors might be misinterpreting the scope for Fed bond purchases, based on Bernanke’s phrasing in 2002.“He advocated purchasing longer-term Treasuries which he defined as notes of up to two-year maturity,” they wrote in a research note last week. “We would therefore judge the possibility of the Fed jumping into the current long-term Treasury market as practically zero and would expect market participants to realize this sooner or later.”As a cautionary tale, they point out that bondholders last got overexcited about the prospect of Fed Treasury purchases in the first half of 2003. In July of that year, then Chairman Alan Greenspan said the situation was “most unlikely to arise,” prompting the biggest one-day jump in the 10-year bond yield in more than seven years.Virtual WorldsThere’s an odd mismatch between investor appetite for lending to governments at ever-decreasing interest rates and what prices in the credit-default swap market are suggesting about the consequences of economic pump-priming and ballooning deficits.The cost of buying protection against deteriorating government creditworthiness is surging for every nation; five- year swaps on the U.S., for example, trade at about 66 basis points, a sixfold increase in six months. Corresponding swaps on the U.K. have leaped to 120 basis points from about 17 basis points in August, while Italy traded at 200 basis points last week, up from 40 basis points three months ago.It may be that the market is so broken that default swaps can’t distinguish noise from signal. Still, record skepticism about government creditworthiness is incongruous with all-time lows for yields. Until that discrepancy with the virtual world of derivatives is explained, maybe investors should avoid driving yields on cash bonds lower.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=ayWr6HwZq0FY&refer=columnist_gilbert
Disbelief • January 14th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
I stand by what I said MA, neither you nor anyone can predict the market nor the future. It’s not a platitude, it’s a fundamental law of the human condition. Unless you have a time machine you’re not telling us about? Making a calculated bet based on likely scenarios is not prediction, it’s making a calculated bet. Quite frankly, from what you have described, I’m not sure that is what you do.In answer to your challenge to make predictions: I try not to make them where my money is concerned. I limit my risk and spread my bets around. Anything can happen.I would hardly describe what Warren Buffet does as “projecting the future.” It seems to me that what he does is make rational bets, or investments if you prefer that terminology.I’m sure you’re the guy who shows up on moving day, assists those less fortunate, etc. I have a pretty good grasp of who/what you are from the posts of yours that I have read. Not to take away from your contributions to society, but the market doesn’t care and being or thinking of yourself as a “better person” still doesn’t give you the ability to predict the market. It just doesn’t.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
“The equalizing of wages around the globe” didn’t really happen, but the multinational elites and their lobbyists and their paid henchmen in Congress blindly thought they could pull this off. In their dreamland, they saw all kinds of smiling middle class consumers in China and India gobbling up their stuff. But, just as has been happening in the U.S. for the last 25 years, the alpha elites and the corrupt in China and India power-grabbed the loaf of bread and only a few dried out crumbs trickled down to the masses. Now, they don’t have any neo-consumer class over there and they bled the consumer class dry here. They cooked the golden goose and now the coop is empty. In their ignorance and arrogance, they thought they could control the world economy and now they know they can’t.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
What you are saying points to either real incompetence or corruption in government. The insolvency of an institution would be discernible through an analysis of its financial condition. Did the goverment lend this money without ensuring the institutions were solvent?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
Does anyone believe the national debt will ever be paid down?DOES ANYONE KNOW WHERE THE MONEY HAS GONE?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 7:21 pm
The political force of this country is based on the fine print that lawyers have established for all of us. You can’t go anywhere without being worried about having your receipt for what you paid for, or keeping in your files all the details of the things you own, your wills, deeds, licenses, copies of regulations—or fulfilling every jot and tittle of the law regarding your taxes and business operations.Yet these same political operatives will submit a bill to Congress, insist it be passed even before it is completely printed, and these Congressmen, most of whom are lawyers, will pass the legislations without reading or discussing it and will then allow the executive branch of government to enforce every tiny detail of the operatives’ bill to the full extent of the law – to the public’s detriment.And the reason Congressmen don’t read the fine print is because it’s not their money, it’s yours — so why would Levin’s group be concerned about what the secret contracts say?And yet these are the same representatives who have forced this society upon us. The same controlling group that is taking the country away is the same controlling group receiving it.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 7:28 pm
As far as I know, they may know but that information isn’t public info.Those are some of the complaints about the TARP, no transparency.. Hanky Panky said that it disclosing it might harm some of the institutions. People might go after them as short opportunities I guess.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Apparently “Yep” isn’t here, so I’ll say it. “Yep.”
Andrew Held • January 14th, 2009 at 7:34 pm
@ORYour take on APOL was appreciated. A new seeking alpha article might interest you:http://seekingalpha.com/article/114648-apollo-group-s-strong-earnings-are-misleading?source=yahooAlso note yesterday’s insider selling.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 7:38 pm
g,global casino time?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
From your mouth..
Octavio Richetta • January 14th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
Let me read the 10Q carefully. I will later report back.
Free Tibet • January 14th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Locked in a closet. The geek squad slides pizzas & ramen noodles under the door twice a day.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 8:51 pm
I was renewing a $250,000 IRA CD today at 3.04% that had been earning 5.75% this past year at the same credit union. I was disturbed, taking a hit of $6775 in annual interest, in addition to an inflation hit using Shadowstats 1990-method inflation at 4.5% and 1980-method at more than 9%. To assuage my bitterness, a staff member said that many credit unions are failing, trying hard to survive in the big-bank infested waters. Her credit union, she said, just bought two troubled credit unions this past November.And so the bankers continue to consolidate the competition as those who are too-big-to-fail are bailed and consume those who are forced to fail – using money they take from the US Treasury. And, of course, the commercials pay much less CD interest for use of the cash.Which brings to mind this article in the NY Times: “Money Market Funds Are a Refuge, Right?”January 11, 2009 — THE amount of cash held in money market funds at the start of 2009 exceeded the money in stock mutual funds for the first time in more than a decade, as shaken investors sought a familiar safe haven.Yet 2008 may go down in history as the year that cast doubt on everything American investors thought they knew about money market funds.Their shares will always be worth 100 cents on the dollar? The oldest money fund sponsor in the country, the Reserve Fund, disclosed in September that its largest money fund had broken the buck, reporting a per-share price of 97 cents.Immediate access to savings? Tens of thousands of Reserve Fund investors are still waiting to get the last of their money back in a liquidation, and may never get the last few cents on the dollar.A plain-vanilla, no-drama investment? Oh, please. The Reserve Fund battle already involves regulatory investigators, a giant Chinese fund caught in the mess and a federal judge in Minneapolis. The Treasury had to cobble together an ad hoc insurance program to keep the Reserve Fund panic from spreading. And the lawsuits stretch from here to next year, and include accusations — denied by the fund — that some big investors were warned of the crisis in time to get out whole.And yet, as the economic storm worsens, money funds still seem the refuge of choice. According to the Investment Company Institute, the nation’s money funds held $3.83 trillion on New Year’s Eve — about $22 billion more than at Christmas, $110 billion more than at Thanksgiving and $712 billion more than at the end of 2007.Those billions could have flowed into F.D.I.C.-insured bank accounts. “But for decades, people have had the choice between higher yield and absolute safety, and they’ve chosen yield,” said Peter Crane, president of Crane Data, which tracks the mutual fund industry…http://www.dailyadvance.com/business/money-market-funds-are-a-refuge-right-366180.html
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Senate to Vote Tomorrow on Releasing TARP Funds, Reid SaysJan. 14 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Senate will vote tomorrow on whether to block the release of the second half of the $700 billion financial-bailout plan, Majority Leader Harry Reid said.Reid said yesterday he was “confident” the Senate would not bar use of the $350 billion requested by President George W. Bush on behalf of President-elect Barack Obama.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aH27VLMb58Ic&refer=home
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
“Obama Unveils New Grand Plan for the Economy” by David Bardallis | January 14, 2009WASHINGTON – President-Elect Barack Obama called on Congress to quickly pass a new fiscal stimulus package that would provide nearly $100,000 trazillion gaquillion frijillion in an effort to revive the U.S. economy, which some experts believe has entered a recession.”Every economist I’ve ever heard of agrees what we need now is significantly more government investment to offset the negative effects of whatever it is that is happening,” Obama said at his Monday press conference. “Accordingly, I and my team of advisors have developed a comprehensive plan that will shore up our financial institutions, put jobless Americans back to work, allow everyone in a house to keep it no matter what, rescue any failing bank or business, provide a hot meal to anyone who is hungry, improve the well being of all citizens, and give a puppy or kitten to every child who wants one.”But Congress must put ideology aside and act now in a bipartisan manner before some other even worse stuff happens,” he added, wiggling the fingers on both his hands to indicate “scary.”Details of the plan were presented by Lawrence Summers, Obama’s top economic advisor and one of the plan’s key architects. Using a colorful chart with squiggly lines, Summers estimated that 845 jiggashillion new jobs would be created in the plan’s first year, with another 491 dubbadillion to follow over the next four years.”Every American will be able to work two, three, four – heck, 10 or 20 jobs if he or she wants to,” said Summers. “And the best part is the income taxes generated from all these new jobs will actually pay for the plan.”Obama emphasized that not only will all the new spending not impose any additional burdens on the middle class, the plan actually targets tax cuts toward politically favored constituencies and whomever else it seems most expedient to target.”The American people have spoken,” said Obama. “They demand change, and I promise that I and every one of my former Clinton administration appointees will work hard to deliver that change.” He also said something about hope and sacrifice and believing.Other highlights of the plan include:· $43 nurpillion for job training· $89 bibblydefrillion for community reinvestment· $505 frappakrillion for infrastructure and public works· $732 hominavillion for health care and education· $986 giggitysquillion for Goldman SachsSome prominent voices have criticized the plan, however. “It’s a good start, but the president-elect doesn’t go nearly far enough,” Nobel laureate Paul Krugman, Nobel-winning winner of the Nobel Prize in economics wrote today in his New York Times column. “We’re talking about the need for another $344 grillion chillion beebopaloobillion, at the very least, to get this economy moving again. Also, tax cuts for anybody: Ick.”Congressional reaction was mixed, as House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) vowed to pass the stimulus package “even if I have to go around and push the ‘yes’ button for every member of this chamber myself, and don’t think I won’t” while some senators cautioned that more debate may be needed.”A schlopparazillion here, a dreedilyhillion there, and pretty soon we’re talking about real money,” said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY).But Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) was optimistic about the bill’s passage, noting that the Senate has already adopted legislation increasing the national debt ceiling to $4,000 pigglywigglyjibbityjabbityfrippityfroppitybadaboomillion.When asked what safeguards would be put in place to ensure that none of the unprecedented $100,000 trazillion gaquillion frijillion was lost to waste, fraud, and abuse, Obama pointed behind the press corps, said “Oh my GOD! LOOK!” then quickly exited the room.http://www.lewrockwell.com/bardallis/bardallis13.html
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
g,that is the problem and why they are printing new money. what was spent was not money, it was credit..to go from near infinite velocity to zero velocitygenerates a lot of heat, not so much light..and to collapse?g,i agree. if not now, very soon. weeks rather than months. we will see. either way, bailouts or not, the thing won’t work going forward. they made the money funny and as such i really don’t see its over riding significance?.3 options . one, attempt to maintain system, bailout banks.etc. result, sacrifice value of currency. etc.. 2. preserve currency value. result, insolvent system collapse. 3. revamp system, top to bottom. “globally” coordinated..everyone agrees and it is the root of the thing, a great transfer of wealth has taken place. it was created out of thin air by the soul of labor and ingenuity, projecting and promising perhaps a future that became improbable or nearly impossible. fraud and theft will do that. and now a shift is taking place and that glacial wealth transfer may be shifting, moving in a direction no one could for see. or has that great wealth sublimated, puff , gone and left a bill that is being passed around. maybe the actual cost hasn’t been calculated yet and that is what all this printing is about? the masters of finance have no idea what they are doing.? shocking and dismaying.but i think they know. greatly rewarded for being such powerful blowhards while inflating they would now like to double bill the public before fleecing them and robbing their graves, in the name of systemic stability.and did i mention this is the root of why you can’t do anything creative or really productive in these united states. because the fed ( read international bankers ) will only allow profitability to flow in one direction, theirs. it is the law.perhaps i’m bitter and frustrated. and in debt forever, every 6 years seeing my savings cut in half. and i don’t even shop.??perhaps iv’e seen too many Alzheimerelders uncomprehendingly and blankly stare atbank statements that communicated nothing. perhaps it was best that they never realized their shares were destroyed by lying blowhards with no shame or decency in spite of the expensive watches and optimistic forecasts.perhaps i’ve talked to too many twenty somethings who have nothing to their names but a debt they will never be able to honestly repay.i’d like to thank all of you honest people, no matter how cynical or jaded. you make it possible for a person to continue to feel somewhat human. that’s still a good thing..it takes a few generations to fleece a people with the debt ideology. it’s been going on longer in the u.s. than in china or india. the system of law and order, property rights and inflation don’t happen overnight, it wouldn’t have that air of legitimacy. parents have to teach their children this to some extent and we all know how inefficient this mechanism is, but orphans don’t have this problem and that can be a blessing. that’s where the money went..and what is with the statistic that 18 american veterans commit suicide every day. now a days.
OuterBeltway • January 14th, 2009 at 9:47 pm
BrainTrusters:Sorry for the extended absence. I wish I could say I’ve been partying all this time, but it’s been recruiting and software and white papers and more recruiting non-stop for the past month. No slack for the wicked.But there’s good news: release one of the collaboration system is out, and the first Early Adopter team has got it under the scope. For those of you that missed the first BrainTrust conference call back in December, our team is working on an internet-based system that enables people from around the world to work together to:a. Posit what the rules for the next economy are going to beb. Determine what general business models are likely to work in tomorrow’s economyc. Take a business model that’s failing now, and use massive collaboration to shape it into a model that’ll work in tomorrow’s economySome of you may be getting tired of telling one another how bad everything is, and what bank just failed, and how stupid the TARP is. If you’re ready to start building stuff, there’s a bunch of us that are doing things you ought to know about.In early February, we’ll be constituting Early Adopter Team II, and some of you, like JasonB, Hayes, OR, GSM, PeteCA, PhilT, PTM, Allessandro, PeterJB, DrSteph and the rest of you high-action-to-talk-ratio people should think about joining this project.Remember: if I didn’t call your name out specifically, please don’t take umbrage, and don’t be put off because we’ve not met personally – shoot me an e-mail at outerbeltway at yahoo dot com and let me know you’re interested in participating.This collaboration toolset will be a very good adjunct to the BrainTrust’s work, as it’ll be a place to implement or certainly influence the formation of the next generation of companies…the ones that can actually compete in tomorrow’s economy.I’ll resume normal posting late-next-week or thereabouts. We’ll wrap up the “what’s the problem” discussion, and start work on the “What’s power and how do you get it?” topic. What good’s a grass-roots organization without power?OB
OuterBeltway • January 14th, 2009 at 9:50 pm
LS: meant to call you out, in particular. Drop me a line, whydontcha.
Chignos • January 14th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
So, tell you what…..when the time comes to pay off all this bailout debt…especially since it’s just fiat money anyway….why don’t we all-Americans just resolve to pass and let them worry about it? Don’t tell me you can’t figure out how to do this. Train your kids that if it happens in their lifetime, they don’t need to feel guilty about evading this responsibility. After all…..this is America…..did you vote for the bailout? I didn’t. Quit all this fretting. When the time comes we’ll just have them all go float.
David in Seattle • January 14th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
THE CENTRAL BUBBLE – US TREASURIES The central most important global fact over this past year is that the deflation which has swept across the world has destroyed an enormous amount of the financial wealth which people thought existed. The worldwide price and valuation crashes in stock markets, real estate and across commodities has now wiped out more than $US 70 TRILLION.The Hard Data Shows It:In the US, data from the Federal Reserve shows that the net worth of US households plunged by $US 2.8 TRILLION in the third quarter, the fourth consecutive quarterly decline. Over the past year, Americans’ net worth has contracted by $US 7 TRILLION. Americans have started to do something they haven’t done since 1952. They have reduced their debts! Reducing debts, repaying loans, is deadly to a credit money system since it contracts – DEFLATES – the quantity of credit money in circulation.American household borrowing, mortgage and consumer credit combined, literally declined at a $US 117.4 Billion annual rate over the third quarter.The so-called authorities panicked and hauled official interest rates down to absurd levels in the vain hope of reigniting a credit expansion. When no such expansion occurred, governments across the West stepped into the vacuum, borrowing what the public now refuses to borrow, in a global orgy of deficit spending. The civil economy has deflated at an unprecedented speed. People are now repaying past debts while not borrowing more. To try to “offset” this, the public or political economy which lives off taxes paid by the civil economy, is piling up its own debts.Something has to give soon. That something will be US Treasury debts.A Future U-Turn In A One Way Street:The Federal Reserve has boxed itself into a corner. With official US rates at (effectively) zero, they have only one way to go in future – UP! As a direct consequence of this, US Treasuries are standing on a trap door. The mad stampede over the past two months into Treasuries for “safety” simply means that these holders of US official debt now stand on that trap door. US Treasuries are the main assets held by the rest of the world’s central banks as reserves behind their own national currencies. US yields are certain to climb as the US Treasury tries to borrow more than $US 2 TRILLION this year. When yields climb, bonds – ALL bonds including US Treasury bonds – fall in value.US Treasuries are the last bubble, following after stocks, real estate and commodities which have already deflated. When the US Treasury bubble bursts, the carnage on the global bond markets will be awesome.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
He is good, but not 100%. He was way off in his oil price prediction last fall, not expecting it to drop below $96.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 10:55 pm
when you have idiotic politicians talking this way. dollar is sure to become zembawe status. William Proxmire is a democrat, why am i not supprised?” Senator William Proxmire: “…there are 37 million people, is that right, that get Social Security benefits?”Social Security Commissioner James Cardwell: “Today between 32 and 34 million.”Proxmire: “I am a little high; 32 to 34 million people. Almost all of them, or many of them, are voters. In my state, I figure there are 600,000 voters that receive Social Security. Can you imagine a senator or congressman under those circumstances saying, ‘We are going to repudiate that high a proportion of the electorate?’ No.Furthermore, we have the capacity under the Constitution, the Congress does, to coin money, as well as to regulate the value thereof. And therefore we have the power to provide that money. And we are going to do it. It may not be worth anything when the recipient gets it, but he is going to get his benefits paid.”Cardwell: “I tend to agree.”My point here is that benefits may get paid in dollars that aren’t worth that much. The cost of living adjustments will be limited or eliminated.”
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 10:57 pm
Obamanonmic and his democratic party will doom USA.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:07 pm
U.S. military report warns ‘sudden collapse’ of Mexico is possible“The Mexican possibility may seem less likely, but the government, its politicians, police and judicial infrastructure are all under sustained assault and press by criminal gangs and drug cartels.”http://www.elpasotimes.com/newupdated/ci_11444354So I have to ask – How is this any different from the USA?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:09 pm
How is this any different from the Bushies giving it away to the wealthy?
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:09 pm
g,ah, but they have arrived too late.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
g,they don’t have nuclear weapons.
blindman • January 14th, 2009 at 11:19 pm
p,i’ve been wondering if you paint on canvas at all?and if not , why not. i would think you could make some good art judging from you comments and unique perspective.you sound more like an artist than a painter.
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:25 pm
swk,any reaction to mr. norman dodd? i’m curious.
2cents • January 14th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
@ DisbeliefI don’t always agree with MA, but I have found him rather willing to “make the call” and provide his reasoning. He has been very open to listen to my alternate reasons and either adjust his, or toss mine out the window so to speak. This tells me he not so ego driven as you implied, but rather truth/results driven.That said, I haven’t seen this much pee in one box here since RYSKAMP left! The floor is all wet!
blindman • January 14th, 2009 at 11:31 pm
d,what consequences do you imagine will follow from that point. ?
Miss India • January 14th, 2009 at 11:33 pm
Where are your recommendations of upmove which you were making in September, guess you have turned bearish. Hope you are not in SHOCK
Guest • January 14th, 2009 at 11:33 pm
Foreclosures in U.S. Rose 81%, Topping 2.3 Million Last YearJan. 15 (Bloomberg) — U.S. foreclosure filings jumped 81 percent last year as falling house prices, tighter mortgage lending and the longest recession in a quarter century battered property owners, RealtyTrac Inc. said.More than 2.3 million properties got a default or auction notice, or were seized by lenders…Relief Efforts FailForeclosure prevention programs offered by U.S. banks and state laws that temporarily delayed property seizures “have not had any real success in slowing down this foreclosure tsunami,” James Saccacio, RealtyTrac’s chief executive officer, said in a statement…About 55 percent of loans modified in the first quarter of 2008 were 30 days or more delinquent six months later…Proposed changes to bankruptcy laws that would allow judges to reduce the principal borrowers owe on their mortgages also may fail to stem foreclosures, according to Glenn Boyd, head of U.S. asset-backed securities strategy at Barclays Capital in New York.Some borrowers will re-default while others whose income is too high to qualify for the plan will walk away from their obligations if neighbors get bailed out, he said.Prices PlummetNevada, Florida, ArizonaNevada had the highest foreclosure rate in 2008, with 7.3 percent of housing units in some stage of default. A total of 77,693 properties received a filing… Florida had the second-highest rate with 4.5 percent of housing units in default. The state had 385,309 properties with filings against them… Arizona had the third-highest rate at 4.49 percent. Properties with filings surged to 116,911… California, Colorado, Michigan, Ohio, Georgia, Illinois and New Jersey were also among the states with the 10 highest rates…California had the most properties with filings: 523,624, representing a 110 percent increase from a year earlier and a six-fold jump from 2006. Florida was second and Arizona third, followed by Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Texas, Georgia, Nevada and New Jersey.California also had the most cities among the top 10 metro areas with the highest foreclosure rates, led by Stockton, where 9.5 percent of housing units were in default, according to RealtyTrac. Riverside-San Bernardino ranked third, Bakersfield was fourth and Sacramento ninth.Crisis May DeepenLas Vegas had the second highest rate with 8.9 percent of housing units receiving a filing…The foreclosure crisis will probably deepen this year as lenders put thousands of bank-owned properties on the market, said real estate broker Mike Novak-Smith in Moreno Valley, California…“You’ve got people losing jobs right and left and the general business climate is bad. We’ve got an economy built on easy credit, and now it’s got to revert.”http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=asgBXeQ.u5Lg&refer=home
jugglingcdos • January 14th, 2009 at 11:36 pm
but they have gun wielding, guitar playing, rocket launching “desperados”if i were you, i’ll be afraid,the least they can do is steal our women.. ohh the horror
blindman • January 14th, 2009 at 11:52 pm
@”We’ve got an economy built on easy credit, and now it’s got to revert.”.says who? the bankers?
Yve • January 14th, 2009 at 11:56 pm
Also wondering…I have been inspired by the spark of hope and real courage to try and effect change in the face of all of this. I hope he’s not suffering some kind of burnout after being so involved. Also, what ever happened to StocksGoinGreen, a.k.a. SSG ? I don’t know if he annoyed people, but he provided me with some much needed comic relief a few times.
Yve • January 15th, 2009 at 12:02 am
Liquidate the farmers!
Cahill • January 15th, 2009 at 12:19 am
The PPT was not designed as a long term solution. It was never meant to sustain the market it was designed to avoid a single day drop of massive proportions (15-25%). The PPT CAN NOT fix the economy, it was created solely to manipulate the market.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 12:27 am
Sounds okay to me. Then we could get rid of the Nineteenth Amendmentratified in 1920, that gave women the vote.IMO, political life in the United States was much more rational before women joined the electorate. Everyone calm down and take a look at recent history and you’ll see what I mean. For example, would a Newt Gingrich or a Barbara Boxer ever have been “elected” without the vote of the fairer sex?So, since we’ll never get rid of the Nineteenth, why not let some “gun wielding, guitar playing, rocket lauching ‘desperados’” lend a helping hand?
Yve • January 15th, 2009 at 12:27 am
HooRah for OuterBeltway et al. Thank you for providing some hope in the midst of this mess, you were missed!
blindman • January 15th, 2009 at 12:39 am
j,they can’t deal with our women and they know it.i’m not worried.the sudden collapse our military should be worrying about is it’s own. 18 american vets commit suicide per day according to one statistician..”In the foreword, Marine Gen. J.N. Mattis, the USJFC commander, said “Predictions about the future are always risky … Regardless, if we do not try to forecast the future, there is no doubt that we will be caught off guard as we strive to protect this experiment in democracy that we call America.”.he should have thought about the democratic experiment when like 80% of the country was saying going into iraq was moronic..but the important morons, very undemocratically, didn’t see it that way. so much for the experiment.america, the experiment. that seems like a curious phrase. when i think of an experiment i think of a controlled set of variables in the hands of a scientist or experimenter. so, am i the experimenter or the object of someone else’s experiment? or both? i hope the experiment offers some results that someone can learn from..instead of the “experiment in democracy” we should really just revert to a simple system of counting votes. anyone who interferes with the process goes to jail. not an experiment, law. imo.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 12:47 am
Try incompetence and corruption.
sick of the blaming • January 15th, 2009 at 12:47 am
seriously morons like you make me sick, realistically how can you be that stupid? Or are you just that insecure and you have to follow the PC crowd and fit in? Everytime I read an idiotic post that blames everything on Bush it makes me want to vomit. This boils down to a much bigger pot than just one man. Everyone is responsible, the everyday man who bought way above his mans, you and I that spend way too much on credit, bad policies, predatory corporations, EVERYONE is to blame.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 12:55 am
hear that, you Europeans? There is work leave in America as well.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 1:09 am
man you really are dumb
Wolf in the Wilds • January 15th, 2009 at 1:20 am
Credit Crisis part deux:We are now at the 2nd stage of the credit crisis. Overcapacity, demand destruction and overleverage will now lead to corporate and retail defaults. There will be massive layoffs, capacity idling, investment pullback, and further bank capital destruction. The impact will be global. Final good demand destruction will cause severe recessions/depression and unemployment. The 2nd leg of this crisis will hit the banks in these countries.The initial impact of the phase 1 of the credit crisis is on the financials. Phase 2 will affect both financials and corporates. From the technical timebomb perspective, the big risk item is Corporate CDOs. If there is systemic default due to the recession/depression, we would see that severe stress in that space, further destroying bank capital and the lending capacity. We are firmly in the negative credit cycle. Unfortunately, governments and central banks are still in denial and so far, attempts to keep the financial sector afloat has been nothing more that throwing good money after bad. And I suspect we are pass the stage where the negative credit cycle can be avoided. Expect to see more frauds appear, as well as more corporate defaults to hit the headlines. Already, we have had a Korean auto company, a Canadian telecommunications company in default, and an Indian fraud. All in the first 2 weeks of January. Expect this trend to accelerate.I will touch on Phase 3 tomorrow.
Cahill • January 15th, 2009 at 1:21 am
He’s DEAD! and thank GOD for that.
GSM • January 15th, 2009 at 1:29 am
As I have always believed, the real data is much worse that publicly known or acknowledged. In fact, I note NR is now awarding a significantly higher chance to an L shaped recession, something which I have been commenting for over 6 months now.My sense is that NR himself is seeing in his forecasts a more dire economic scenario than he would rather reveal because of the (well earned) promotion of his reputation for economic predictions.Frankly, this is going to be the worst economic period any of us have ever known or thought could be possible.I would like to see more commentary from NR on how he believes people should best protect their finances during this very diificult period.
JLC • January 15th, 2009 at 2:16 am
A selection from Irving Fisher I picked up at Steve Keen’s Oz Debtwatch. Pretty much sums it all up:“(1) Debt liquidation leads to distress selling and to(2) Contraction of deposit currency, as bank loans are paid off, and to a slowing down of velocity of circulation. This contraction of deposits and of their velocity, precipitated by distress selling, causes(3) A fall in the level of prices, in other words, a swelling of the dollar. Assuming, as above stated, that this fall of prices is not interfered with by reflation or otherwise, there must be(4) A still greater fall in the net worths of business, precipitating bankruptcies and(5) A like fall in profits, which in a “capitalistic,” that is, a private-profit society, leads the concerns which are running at a loss to make(6) A reduction in output, in trade and in employment of labor. These losses, bankruptcies, and unemployment, lead to(7) Pessimism and loss of confidence, which in turn lead to(8) Hoarding and slowing down still more the velocity of circulation. The above eight changes cause(9) Complicated disturbances in the rates of interest, in particular, a fall in the nominal, or money, rates and a rise in the real, or commodity, rates of interest.” (Econometrica, 1933, Volume 1, p. 342)
PterJB • January 15th, 2009 at 2:26 am
Speaking of the United Nations and such like organizations and their claimed “integrity”:http://wikileaks.org/wiki/United_Nations_confidential_reportsArrogance is directly proportional to incompetence and stupidity and the ensuing levels of criminal behaviour arising therefrom.It is sheer lunacy to prop up bankrupt organization in favour of a healthy socio-economic driver community especially when, to add insult to the ensuing injury, the propping is done with the funds of the latter.Professor: It is obvious from your evolving predictions that you will soon see the future according to my predictions of 2006. Soon you will be politically correct and a fashionable association.Heart Attack AlertFrom Shadowstats: Alternative DataCPI – Inflation (SGS): 9%Unemployment: Off the chart at 18%+GDP: Heading to -3% and beyond ‘-x’Dollar: In “extremis”Citi and BoA on their respective deathbeds.Emergency Alert: There are some that expect President Obama to kiss it all better…Expect Gaza to be cleansed 100%. This would make Genghis Khan look like a quiet studious type.Is this what we call civilization building?Ho hum
nik of jay • January 15th, 2009 at 2:43 am
does CM = SGG?
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 2:51 am
w,”.. and then he went to the sun. and when he got there the sun was a wilted sunflower.”
The Alarmist • January 15th, 2009 at 3:16 am
Sounds interesting … but you know, just once I would like to be a part of the Shadow Conspiracy everyone keeps carping about in these posts, since that is where the real money seems to be. Where does one go to sign up for that?
The Alarmist • January 15th, 2009 at 3:21 am
Going into Iraq was not moronic … staying there was moronic.
OuterBeltway • January 15th, 2009 at 3:40 am
Yves: The “et al” is really outstanding. The only way it could be improved is if you joined us.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 4:03 am
European banks shed Indian shares MUMBAI: The tumble in equities on Thursday is believed to have been precipitated by selling from some European financial institutions.According to people familiar with the development, Swiss financial major UBS has been a notable seller in the market today.Their selling has resulted in fresh speculation cropping up about the health of Europe’s financial institutions, though this could not be substantiated. Though there are no official figures about the quantum of UBS’s investments in India, market participants estimate them at roughly $1.0-1.5 billion.This talk comes at a time when a larger section of the market participants thought that the worst impact of the subprime crisis on global financial institutions was over.
painter • January 15th, 2009 at 4:33 am
my obsession to detail drove me mad. restoring wood trim that was hand planed and plaster with horse hair, releases energy i can live with. but now with no work or not enough to pay the bills i find myself thinking of things like how can a Buddhist be a Buddhist
Pecos Banker • January 15th, 2009 at 4:43 am
Obama=University of Chicago=Milton Friedman
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 5:06 am
I just read the financial statements portion of the 10Q which of course reflect history as opposed to the future. The key thing I was looking for was a discrepancy between the Income Statement and the Cash flow Statement that may indicate cash generation may be drying up in this business.I am sorry to report that last quarter APOL generated cash in a way that was “as strong as strong can be”. That may dry up in the future because of all the reasons cited in the seeking alpha article but there is no evidence of a slowdown in cash flow growth yet. Actually, cash flow growth has accelerated significantly. When and if cash flow starts to slow down, it will start showing in the CFS and that would be one of the key indicators I would use to consider APOL a possible “safe” short again.On the importance of the three-student lawsuit I would take that with a grain of salt. In the case of Bally Total Fitness, which I discussed in a previous post on APOL, there were many, many lawsuits from customers denouncing their sleazy tactics. But these ongoing lawsuits were not the ultimate catalyst that brought BFT down.Bottom line: I have obviously invested a lot less time into analyzing APOL as a possible short than many other smart people such as Chanos, but in my opinion, at this point this is not a slam-dunk short. You may make some money just because it went so high but not because there is a clear indication that the business is breaking down and the street knows about it.
Edward • January 15th, 2009 at 5:23 am
Marx was one of the greatest thinkers of the 19th century, agree with him or not (I don’t). To understand why he came to his beliefs you need to understand the excesses of capitalism and the exploitation of workers during that period.
Wild Bill • January 15th, 2009 at 6:01 am
If a forest is devastated and clear cut, all the valuable wood is removed and the remaining branches and vegetation is burned, there remains a legacy in the soil from which new growth will emerge.The new growth will not be young trees of the same sort as the ones that the former forest was made of. It will rather be highly specialized plants that will be highly productive, but not highly efficient. Drawing from the legacy in the soil they will rapidly cover the earth with life enhancing vegetation. As they grow, they will leave a legacy of their own that will make it possible for the next succession of trees that are the most efficient producers for the region. Those trees will leave a legacy of their own that will promote the growth of producers known for high levels of stability and diversity and lower productivity, thus achieving sustainability.You will note that just as evolution sometimes requires a step back before going forward, a forest requires a reversion to a less mature state before recovering from a devastating event.Our economy does not have to revert to a hunter-gatherer state before recovering. A legacy of knowledge has been left for us. A reversion to a simpler method of local production and consumption by individuals capable of greater self-sufficiency in terms of food and energy production, can be achieved using the decentralization potential of recent advances in energy production.The Phoenix that rises from the ashes of our present world economy must not be the same bird that’s crashing to the earth now. It must be a magnificent bird with exhilarating potential for humanity.
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 6:16 am
MA: diz 1 4 U! (A devil’s advocate post designed to keep the conversation flowing. I hope, once again, that the blog police picks diz one as one of the better posts is this thread:-)Let’s start by recognizing that ALL talk about short-term market movements (including my own) is no more than pure conjecturing/speculating. This being said, here you have some more!If you look at the chart of past and current market crashes (dshort via CR)http://dshort.com/charts/bears/four-bears-extended-large.gifYou will note that if you are going to compare the current crash to past crashes the one to use is clearly the 1929-1932 crash. This is because the economic conditions we have now a days resemble most those of the depression.Using historical price movements in stocks, including: market tops, bottoms, statistics on frequency of event such as as January goes goes the year, etc., may be a fun exercise but not a very reliable one. However, one can use such historical information to note that rare price movements such as huge drops are indeed possible. Thus, what the 1929-32 chart is telling me is that the market may drop quite a bit more from here. By this I don’t mean it will, but that such an event is clearly an event with a POSITIVE PROBABILITY.The economic fundamentals outlined by the Professor, which of course may not be of much use in forecasting the market short term, also indicate that much lower valuations are indeed possible even though “for the long run” as Jeremy Siegel says(now Joined by Hussman who in his latest reiterates stocks are about fairly valued now and should produce attractive long term returns) stocks are a sure(?) bet.I use (?) because there have been 20 year periods in the past in which stocks have not done much: http://www.investmentu.com/IUEL/2005/20050509.htmlScroll down to the chart that looks at 20 year average returns for the 86 20-year periods contained in 1919-2004. You will note that for periods with average beginning PE of 19 such as, e.g., 1998,1999,2000 the average return for the next 20 years was on average about the same as inflation (i.e., 3%). What does this mean? if you take 1998 and add 20 to it you get 2018. So, I am not saying it will happen but it may be that for the 1998-2018 period, or for instance the 2007-2027, for which the starting PE is also above 19, the average market return may be only 3%. An interesting exercise is the following: assume you will end up with a 3% average return for the 2007-2027 period; since we know the returns for 2007, 5.49%, and 2008, -37% (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S&P_500 ), we can calculate the average return for the 18 years we have left to get to an average of 3% for the 20 years:(1+0.0549)*(1-0.37)*[(1+x)]^18=(1.03)^20Solving for x we get: x={(1.03)^20/[(1+0.0549)*(1-0.37)]}^(1/18) – 1 = 3.64%Thus, we see that despite the 37% drop in 2008 and the relatively low return in 2007 of 5.49%. An average return for the coming 18 years of only 3.7% is a distinct possibility!So we see that, both, on the short term (1929-1932 crash chart above) as well as the long term (my analysis above), there are significant downside risks to holding stocks.MA’s argument at the beginning of the thread seem to be based on the argument “GEE man!, 8000 on the DOW is low enough, we can’t go much lower than that”.That may be what most market participants may be thinking, it may be that we do get the bounce for diz reason or just by chance and MA is “proven” right.However let me give an alternate interpretation which is just as valid: The market action in the last few days shows that, once again, Goldilocks are facing reality and the turmoil we saw last October and November may be revisited. IMO, the possibility of this interpretation being right is high so I am playing it safe, I am staying out of the market to protect myself from downside risk even though I may miss the upside.
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 6:22 am
WinW: what can I say? Better just give you the grade: A+!
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 6:28 am
I agree; Faber did best. Still, with such an illustrious crowd, my expectation was to see at least one guy to deserve a grade of A in investing for 2008. IMO, Faber deserves at most a B. Almost all the others deserve an F.
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 6:31 am
Here it is: How is JPM doing in the pre-market?http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aM5FfkHGrRyw&refer=homeJPMorgan Profit Drops 76 Percent on $2.9 Billion of Writedowns
Free Tibet • January 15th, 2009 at 6:31 am
One of the more prudent things I could do would be to somehow hedge my risk to the dollar. So, here come the gold salesmen. Right? But even the amount of gold I might buy would never offset a significant part of my dollar exposure.Where do you turn? Euros? That’s hardly better. CHF? That’s a charade. Those banks are in the dollar business themselves. Not a hedge. In fact, as our professor has said, in an economy as interdependent as ours there is no place to turn.A year ago I was asking what the world would look like without a reserve currency. London Banker said I was nuts. At the time it was a thought experiment. It’s more than a negligible probability now. Benny’s at the wheel of the money machine and he’s lost his mind. What I would think the least probable is a long flat bottom L shaped recession. If things don’t get fixed reasonably soon the world economy splinters. Europe goes its way. Asia by itself. The global economy comes apart like Pangaea.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 6:36 am
What does “Dollar: In “extremis”" mean?
Gloomy • January 15th, 2009 at 6:42 am
IMO you will not see bankruptcy of any large US companies. Because of CDS risks, the government just won’t allow it, and will choose to bailout instead. Until all of these bailouts cause the dollar to crash and the music stops.
genedio • January 15th, 2009 at 6:44 am
That wasn’t really very much of a sucker rally we just had. Roubini says a “nice 25% rally”, but my chart shows two rallies: 8,200 to 9,600 back in late October, and 7,550 to 8,800 in late November (or 9,000 if you count until early January). Neither rally was 25%. We’re not even talking 20% rallies here. As for rallies as a proportion of the previous decline, I have looked at the 1929-32 bear market, and rallies were usually 30-45% on the monthly averages. So even if the present bear is as bad as 1929-32, I’d expect a temporary recovery in the monthly average to 9,900 given that we have been falling since August with no gain on the monthly averages since then. We have fallen over 3,000 points on the Dow. A 1,500 pt. recovery would be in line with the Nov, 1929- March, 1930 and Sept, 2002 – Nov, 2002 recoveries.Of course, there is the possibility that this market will lack the recoveries of 1929 and 2002, in which case why is the Professor still estimating a 2-year recession? He should be talking 1873-9 instead of 1973-5 or even 1929-32.
Free Tibet • January 15th, 2009 at 6:46 am
Princeton
Free Tibet • January 15th, 2009 at 6:50 am
Phase 3 IS dollar crash.
plongka10 • January 15th, 2009 at 6:52 am
Deep Capture Blog to win “Best Business Blog” award.If you are not fully aware of the entrenched corruption in the System yet, I suggest you check out http://www.deepcapture.com and then decide if you can ever “win” in a system that smells so foul. How the DTCC and SEC are still in existence beats me!
ex VRWC • January 15th, 2009 at 6:57 am
The next TARP setup now becomes more clear: BofA to get help digesting Merrill LynchThe upshot is that BofA got cold feet, but they received ‘assurances’ that the government would step in to help it absorb any Merrill losses if the deal went through. Assurances from whom? How many more ‘gentleman’s agreements’ are sitting out there waiting to be made known? The reason?..snip..
“The bank must have decided that these Merrill issues would keep pounding on their earnings and on their dividend and on their stock price into 2010 or 2011, so they turned to the government,” Hendler said.
So now we are spending billions based on someone’s word given to BofA not so they can lend, not so we can the real economy going. No, that would be the government working in the interests of the people. Instead, we are sending billions to bailout the BofA shareholders. And they are spinning it that BofA took action to ‘save the system’.Can someone tell me why this company should continue to be publicly traded? Are we taking such actions to preserve the ‘free’ market?
Mani • January 15th, 2009 at 7:01 am
Thank you for this. It’s been a while since I laughed so hard.
GratefulGuest • January 15th, 2009 at 7:02 am
David, I also wondered what you see as the timing of all this.
Free Tibet • January 15th, 2009 at 7:03 am
Trade defines homo sapiens. We traded as hunter-gatherers. It is the one ecological adaptation that separates us from everything else. What can be lost is that efficiency that we call today comparative advantage. The ability to supply ourselves from far and wide. Restructuring our economies to survive without global trade is unthinkable – inconceivable. But there are certain necessary but artificial constructs that make that possible. Money. Confidence. When that’s lost…
zebla • January 15th, 2009 at 7:07 am
14 janvier 2009Le récent rebond des marchés (Bear-Market-Sucker) perd de sa force sous l’effet d’une avalanche d’affreuses nouvelles macro-économiques et d’annonces de baisse des bénéfices (profit-warnings)J’avais prévu depuis un certain temps que ce rallye haussier prendrait fin (comme les précédents au cours des 18 derniers mois) et que les marchés actions aux Etats-Unis et ailleurs dans le monde iraient vers de nouveaux plus bas.Permettez-moi maintenant de vous expliquer pourquoi …Selon mes prévisions et celles de l’équipe de recherche de RGE Monitor nous entrons dans la pire récession aux États-Unis de ces 50 dernières années, et la pire récession mondiale globale depuis des décennies. Nous publierons cette semaine pour nos clients notre « 2009 Global Economic Outlook » document de recherche de 75 pages et nous avons récemment publié nos perspectives pour les Etats-Unis.Durant quelques semaines, depuis la fin Novembre, les marchés boursiers ont ignoré la déferlante de nouvelles macro-économiques bien pires que prévues (et vraiment pire qu’horrible) et ont connu un joli rebond de 25%.Mais les roulements de tambour à l’annonce de terribles nouvelles économiques, financières et concernant les bénéfices des entreprises ont finalement pris le dessus sur la conviction illusoire que le pire était passé pour les marchés financiers et les marchés actions et que les États-Unis et l’économie mondiale repartiraient dans la seconde moitié de 2009.Ainsi, les marchés actions ont déjà reperdu plus de la moitié de ce qu’ils avaient regagné lors du récent rallye alors que les mauvaises nouvelles macro-économiques ont finalement anéanti, la dernière semaine, les espoirs des analystes.En effet, les chiffres publiés aujourd’hui des ventes au détail confirment le ralentissement des achats par des consommateurs dépourvus d’économies et écrasés par l’endettement.Maintenant que le chômage augmente, que les revenus, la valeur des patrimoines immobiliers et des portefeuilles actions chutent, le service de la dette qui continue de croître et les restrictions de crédit affectent sévèrement la capacité de consommation.Il faudra plusieurs années pour que la réduction des dépenses et le désendettement du consommateur aux États-Unis permettent la reconstitution du taux d’épargne des ménages alors que le patrimoine de ces derniers se contracte violemment suite à la baisse de valeur de leur maison et de leurs actions et alors que leurs dettes augmentent, que leur capacité à générer des revenus diminue et que le chômage augmente.Selon les recherche de RGE Monitor, et la récession mondiale et aux États-Unis se poursuivra au moins jusqu’au 4ème trimestre 2009 (grosse récession en forme de U, de 24 mois), la reprise en 2010-11 sera très faible de la croissance autour de 1 % ce qui est bien au-dessous d’un potentiel de 2,75%. Et plus grave, nous ne pouvons pas exclure qu’une stag-déflation en forme de L (comme au Japon dans les années 1990) prenne le relais.En effet, comme je le disais récemment:Bien que la probabilité d’une crise financière systémique ait été réduite par l’action du G7 et d’autres pays, d’extrêmes vulnérabilités demeurentLe resserrement du crédit va persister et de se propager au-delà des prêts hypothécaires. Le deleveraging continuera, comme des milliers de fonds – dont beaucoup disparaîtront – et d’autres acteurs ayant utilisé l’effet de levier seront contraints de vendre des actifs à des prix cassés sur des marchés illiquides, ce qui entraînera des baisses de prix et conduira plus d’insolvabilité et plus de faillites d’institutions financières.Les pertes de crédit monteront alors que la récession s’approfondira. Et les économies de certains marchés émergeants connaîtront certainement de véritables crises financières.Ainsi, 2009 sera une année douloureuse de récession mondiale et de la continuation du stress dans la finance, des pertes et des faillites. Actuellement, la probabilité d’une stag-déflation en forme de L, est désormais d’un tiers, alors que la probabilité d’une grave récession en forme de U est de deux tiers.Seules des actions de nature politique, agressives et coordonnées de la part des pays avancés aussi bien que des pays émergeants pourraient permettre à l’économie mondiale de commencer à se reprendre lentement en 2010, plutôt que d’entrer dans une plus longue période de stagnation.Alors que nos scénarios de référence voit une grave récession mondiale en forme de U, avec une très faible croissance en 2010, nous ne pouvons pas exclure une possibilité plus pessimiste, c’est-à-dire une récession en forme de L, de probabilité d’un tiers selon notre point de vue.En résumé, le pire est encore devant nous plutôt que derrière pour l’économie réelle et les marchés financiers. Avec mes prévisions de 2009, le bénéfice par action des entreprises pour le S&P 500 serait dans les 50 à 60 dollars et la moyenne du P/E ratio pourrait être dans la fourchette de 10 à 12, dans le contexte de cette grave récession mondiale. Le S&P 500 pourrait en 2009 toucher un plus bas au mieux à un niveau de 720 et, dans le pire scénario, un niveau aussi faible que 500 ou 600.Le pire est encore devant nous.
p • January 15th, 2009 at 7:34 am
sound like today
kilgores • January 15th, 2009 at 7:58 am
I’ve been indisposed for a couple of days and hadn’t seen the links that blindman posted on the previous thread. I’ll try to make a point of viewing these and let you know.SWK
kilgores • January 15th, 2009 at 8:03 am
Dr. Roubini:Are you considering making your 2009 Global Economic Outlook freely available, as you did last year?Thanks,SWK
Hayes • January 15th, 2009 at 8:07 am
Two current video clips featuring: Meredith Whitney On Financials and banks Roubini on CNBC this AM
aerial view • January 15th, 2009 at 8:37 am
totally agree! All of the lenders and brokers I have contact with say similar things about BofA, Citi and others when they hold the 2nd mortgage: they are doing everything they can to impede settlements on short sales of homes even after the lst lender has approved the offer! This makes their balance sheets look even more negative and makes it far easier to claim hardship for more bailout money: they continue to milk the system at taxpayer’s expense!
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Just wanted to share this with the blog:My 86-year-old father-in-law and I were discussing the current economic situation yesterday. He’s a very sharp and thoughtful old gentleman, but also very reserved and more often raises questions rather than giving opinions. When I asked him about his impression of what’s going on now, he said “It seems like old times…” I felt that the simplicity of his statement spoke volumes about what’s happening currently.He also asked another interesting question: Given that we’ve experienced a colossal leveraging in the economy which resulted mostly from the financial industry’s changing the lending model from “originate and hold” to “originate and sell” (and from the rating services NOT changing their methods accordingly), exactly WHERE is the money that was created? In other words, “sellers” were paid cash dollars from loans by banks to “buyers”. So WHERE is the money that these sellers received?
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 8:58 am
Obamanomic and Democrasocialonmic will doom USA. 800Billion+ stimulus blew on health care, education, and highway construction? Is this a screw up NEW DEAL? whatever about real job that benefit USA economy? Read my lip, Obama and his people will doom USA.http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Dems-unveil-825-billion-apf-14070097.html” WASHINGTON (AP) — House Democrats are circulating an $825 billion economic stimulus measure that emphasizes health care, education and highway construction as well as tax cuts for individuals and businesses.A summary of the measure shows spending totaling roughly $550 billion and tax cuts of $275 billion, although the totals are expected to shift considerably as Congress works on the bill.Democratic leaders plan to unveil the legislation later today. The Associated Press obtained a copy in advance.Democratic leaders have pledged to have a bill ready for President-elect Barack Obama to sign by mid-February.”
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 9:03 am
Ah ha, now we are in same page. Obama and Democrasocialist pigs are as incompetent as GOP pigs. USA is doomed under either party.
MM CA • January 15th, 2009 at 9:10 am
SSO my a** – only people buying stocks are the FED and the banks… this puppy belongs at 5000 dow and 500 S&P … get it reset and start over…. actually who cares – Wall street and the Stock markets have effectively made themselves irrevelant going forward to 99.99% of the American population….
ptm • January 15th, 2009 at 9:18 am
You are thinking like an Austrian economist, but was never a cash-on-the-barrel-head deal. Fractional loan banking allowed the banks and the shadow banking system to create bank accounts (money) out of thin air. These accounts then went onto the lender’s balance sheet as an asset. Also, a lot of this was unregulated, so if the the loan looked too risky, the banks would not even put the transaction on their public books.Add greed and corruption to free money and you have a seductive elixir that drove investment banks agents into creating CDO’s out of thin air using the CDS shorting fees! There was real cash at the top of this pyramid however; and that occurred when the CDS short contracts were paid.Meanwhile, all the borrowers (players) have lots of account balances (cash) to create new ventures offering the same easy payment terms to their customers. It called a debt-based economy, and it works until Joe6pack starts to miss that monthly payment. Which is why the financial system is now insolvent.So there was never any real money to begin with, but now we-the-taxpayers are told to cough up real cash (maybe upto $10 trillion) to clean of this mess.
Hayes • January 15th, 2009 at 9:22 am
Depression ahead, prepare for stock rout-SocGenLONDON, Jan 15 (Reuters) – Societe Generale said on Thursday that the United States’ economy looks likely to enter a depression and China’s could implode.In a highly bearish note, veteran cross asset strategist Albert Edwards said investors should now cut equity exposure after a turn-of-the-year rally and prepare for a rout.He predicted that the S&P 500 index of U.S. stocks could be set for a fall of nearly 70 percent from recent levels.Edwards also raised the danger of a global trade war with China.”While economic data in developed economies increasingly reflects depression rather than a deep recession, the real surprise in 2009 may lie elsewhere,” Edwards wrote.”It is becoming clear that the Chinese economy is imploding and this raises the possibility of regime change. To prevent this, the authorities would likely devalue the yuan. A subsequent trade war could see a re-run of the Great Depression.”Edwards has long been one of the most bearish analysts in London, first with Dresdner Kleinwort and then with SocGen.But he called in October for clients to increase their exposure to equities, which he said were due a rebound.”We believe that the market is (now) set to quickly slide sharply towards our 500 target for the S&P,” he said.The S&P 500 <.SPX> stock index is currently at 842, up about 14 percent since hitting a low in November.(Editing by Ron Askew)http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/8260101
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 9:26 am
Just sold my SPY 88 Feb put position which I opened on 12/30 at a 47.40% profit. Not that the market may not test the November lows soon but money in the bank is money in the bank, specially with short-lived options.I have little practical experience with options. I opened put and call SPY Feb 09 positions with the same $88 strike on 12/30. Sometimes, the market smiles at you, I managed to make a good profit in both positions when I was in fact prepared to have them both expire worthless:-)
Wrightdda • January 15th, 2009 at 9:29 am
MA – I appreciate your comments and thinking – Gold at 800 and DOW at 8000 – what’s your thought on the recent correlation?
CM • January 15th, 2009 at 9:54 am
MUST PROTECT DOW 8000!!!
Dan • January 15th, 2009 at 9:57 am
New Thread
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 10:05 am
Looks like rallytime.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 10:12 am
1. 1500 banks go away- in progress- Citi in trouble- BOFA too2. 200,000 store closings – in progress- Gottshcalks Bankrupt3. Dow at 5000 possibly 4000 -stays propped up by continued Govt purchases of shares and preferred shares- do not use as gauge of how economy is doing- http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/82601014. S&P at 500 possibly 400- http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/82601015. Mortgage rates for new homes go to 3% and resale’s/refi’s at 3.75% – pushed by Obama6. Tax credit of at least 25k for home buyers7. Chrysler is gone by March.8. GM goes under by Sept.9. GE files bankruptcy – http://clusterstock.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/gm-gm-we-still-cant-rule-out-bankruptcy10. Calf state budget deficit hits 50 Billion- presently 41B11. All states and local gov’ts approach 300 billion deficits combined12. Massive state and local gov’t layoffs nationwide13. official unemployment hits 13%, unofficial unemployment hits 25% – current: http://clusterstock.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/jobs-numbers-much-worse-than-you-think14. Gas prices hover around 1.50 gallon unless there is major Mideast/Pakistani/Indian crisis then it goes to 5.00 quickly15. GDP shrinks at 6-8% for 200916. Deflation takes strong hold until sept 2009, at which point hyperinflation is roaring by dec 2009. – http://clusterstock.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/full-text-of-bernankes-speech17. US Dollar continues slow decline against Yen, Euro, Pound and Yuan – losses 50% by Dec 200918. 2009 Federal deficit hits 2 Trillion – Update: 1st qtr almost 500 Billion19. total Bailout and govt assistance programs approach 15 trillion from when it started in summer of 2008- currently at 8 trillion – http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=at6cYfv8wFJw&refer=home20. Total US liability approaches 60 Trillion by 200921. bond market collapses22. US treasuries become almost worthless23. China pulls the trigger and demands we pay back what we owe or they stop shipping goods to us or cut prices dramtically -(LONDON, Jan 15 (Reuters) – Societe Generale said on Thursday that the United States’ economy looks likely to enter a depression and China’s could implode.In a highly bearish note, veteran cross asset strategist Albert Edwards said investors should now cut equity exposure after a turn-of-the-year rally and prepare for a rout.He predicted that the S&P 500 index of U.S. stocks could be set for a fall of nearly 70 percent from recent levels.Edwards also raised the danger of a global trade war with China.”While economic data in developed economies increasingly reflects depression rather than a deep recession, the real surprise in 2009 may lie elsewhere,” Edwards wrote.”It is becoming clear that the Chinese economy is imploding and this raises the possibility of regime change. To prevent this, the authorities would likely devalue the yuan. A subsequent trade war could see a re-run of the Great Depression.”Edwards has long been one of the most bearish analysts in London, first with Dresdner Kleinwort and then with SocGen.But he called in October for clients to increase their exposure to equities, which he said were due a rebound.”We believe that the market is (now) set to quickly slide sharply towards our 500 target for the S&P,” he said.The S&P 500 <.SPX> stock index is currently at 842, up about 14 percent since hitting a low in November.)24. Housing values decline another 15-25% from Nov 2008 levels- Calif, Fla, AZ, Nevada see even steeper declines – http://www.housingwire.com/2009/01/14/foreclosure-activity-fires-back-up-in-california-report/25. States and local govts raise taxes on everything, unless Federal govt gives them help… this is going to be ugly26. Obama starts giving states and companies relief on Medical insurance premiums and costs.. possible full nationalization of Health care system gets underway in 200927. Fed possibly nationalizes entire banking system28. More Madoffs and ponzi scams totaling 1 trillion may happen, unless they hide the losses29. approx 2 Trillion in more bad Res mortgages/losses to be absorbed by banks and govt – http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601213&sid=aTtVEJqx_S2w&refer=home30. 1 in 3or4 mortgages fail. Prime and Alt A pool problem is actually worse and larger than sub prime problem – http://www.housingwire.com/2009/01/14/foreclosure-activity-fires-back-up-in-california-report/31. commercial real estate and rents fall off a cliff, 50% drop in values and 1.5 Trillion in losses.32. Obama polls on effectiveness of handling job fall to Bush levels by end of 2009 – not his fault.33. US possibly gets involved in much larger ground war somewhere to stimulate economy and jobs and deal with crisis in mid east/India/Pakistan/Russia/Korea34. Credit card Debt approaches 2 trillion in losses for banks and lenders35. the Yankees with their new 3 players they paid 1/2 billion dollars to, win the world Series, but Yankee Revenue and profit implodes and Team gets in finaiancial trouble.36. 5-10 or more major sports teams go bankrupt in 200937. something happens in later part of year to unite the country… could be good or bad..38. Govt deals with civil unrest in parts of the country…..39. people will think things are better for 1-2 months at times during the year, only to be hit over the head with more bad economic news and problems40. these problems will last until at least 2012 as Americas struggle with all the resetting going on in the economy, from wages, to housing, to buying, to energy, to living simpler… – http://clusterstock.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/depression-odds-above-5041. Entire Govt and private Corp pension system is underwater by at least 2 trillion dollars and will be huge issue for Govt to deal with in 2009 – http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aw9HrY21Ynno&refer=home42. Noretl goes bankrupt- I called this one in Nov.
Anonymous • January 15th, 2009 at 10:25 am
I agree. Bush was the leader who led us into this mess, Congress overspent for decades (and approved a worthless war) and consumers consumed on credit. And I bet Olivia’s class got the ice cream.
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 10:26 am
@ptm Thanks, that’s a good succinct outline of the (visible) transaction paths, and I get what you’re saying about a “debt-based economy”.So, at the lowest level in the chain, a house-seller was paid real cash by Joe6pack’s bank and the worthless loan was sliced & diced into cloud-cookoo-land. But then this tower of ice-cream sticks was brought down when Joe started missing his payments. Is that right?If so, wasn’t there still a great deal of real cash (on the barrel head) going into the house-seller’s pocket? (Which now has to come back out as a taxpayer footing the $10T.)
ptm • January 15th, 2009 at 10:50 am
Yes, the whole financial system was built on Joe6pack’s monthly payments.If the home seller were to go to the bank, withdraw cash, take it home, stick it in a Mason jar, then yes, it would have been cash deal. But that’s not what happened. Proceeds were rolled over from the sold house to a down payment on a new house, or a new boat, or a new car. No one kept the cash, they just levered themselves up another notch feeding financial industry with more fees.Just for perspective, there is actually very little relative cash in the system. The Federal Reserve only holds about $200 billion. There is another $50 billion in commercial bank vaults and another $780 billion held outside the USA in foreign bank vaults. So that’s $1.030 trillion in cash compared to an M3 of $14.271 trillion or just 7.2% of the money supply is in cash. The rest of the money is just numbers in bank accounts.
Andrew Held • January 15th, 2009 at 11:21 am
Thanks
Octavio Richetta • January 15th, 2009 at 11:41 am
The reading flows easy. Most, quite plausible.
Mark • January 15th, 2009 at 11:48 am
A remark like that from someone who cannot properly format a sentence? LOL Anytime that you’re ready to come out from hiding behind “Guest” and want to engage in a serious debate I’ll be ready…Mark
Mark • January 15th, 2009 at 11:52 am
I don’t know so much whether the “planners” were looking to equalize wages as much as it has to do with normal tendencies for systems to find equilibria.But your point about any desire to create a world filled with middle-class consumers is clearly correct: could never happen. (not because of corruption, but because there’s not enough resources on the planet to create and maintain one)Mark
Steve S • January 15th, 2009 at 11:55 am
I find it interesting that everyone is making comparisons to 1929-1932 crash. Although some of the financial problems are similar from a stock market perspective, I see this as a 1937-1942 comparison. The Dow of 1929 was primarily high-tech (radio, telephone) stocks that crashed 90%. Our 2000-2002 dotcom crash was 80% and had a 50% recovery like the Dow of 1929. 1937 bear followed 1929 by 8 years, just like 2000 and 2008.There is an interesting chart here (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/10/11/business/20081011_BEAR_MARKETS.html). If valid this means we bottom in the S&P 500-600 range as NR forecasts, but that it may be drawn out to 2012 (alt-A, option arm tsunami?).
Mark • January 15th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
It’s all getting hazy now… thought for a minute that this came from The Onion
Mark
Mark • January 15th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
No, our foreign debt holders
)Mark
Mark • January 15th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
all the valuable wood is removedThat wood represents valuable minerals. Keep this up and you end up with mineral deficient soil where nothing much grows.Fundamentals! I guarantee that we’re going back to hunter-gatherer. This will happen due to the eventual cycling of the interglacial period to the next glacial period. What triggers it is excess levels of CO2 in the atmosphere, caused by a lack of carbon-sinking fauna, caused by a lack of nutrients in the soil to maintain the necessary fauna: for more info read John Hammaker’s The Survival of Civilization (google it). Humans have some ability to affect the timing, but in the end it’s a big reset- it’s a built-in in the REAL system!Mark
Cahill • January 15th, 2009 at 1:00 pm
I understand his beliefs and in a perfect world the man would be 100% right but it’s not a perfect world and his beliefs have lead to much worse treatment of the people than the excesses of capitalism did at that time. And I’m not trying to defend the excesses then or now they are evil.
David in Seattle • January 15th, 2009 at 1:36 pm
I believe that the timing will fall between middle of 2009 to middle of 2010. All the holders of U.S. debt; the Arabs, Chinese, Russians, and Japanese, will have to divert their resources inward rather than keep buying our debt. The have no choice really.
MA • January 15th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
In EARLY MAY, I called for oil to peak at $145. and in that same call, I said it would “rapidly” decrease to the $90-105 range.Oil hit did exactly what I said, with a high close of 145.29, and then rapidly dropped to $90… where it then climbed back to $110.I then called for another oil drop, (not specifying any price) About 2 months later, (While oil was hovering around 70, i said Oil would have to find its home in the $40-45 price range. (my only real error was thinking it would take years to get there… but none the less, I believe that the 40-45 range is that next median average level that we see in hindsight.)Please, don’t misquote me….and thanks, for the acknowledgement.I’m really hoping people can make some money (or save some money) with my “advice”.Miss America
Guest • January 15th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
Please correct point 9. It should be GM, not GE.
Steve • January 15th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
The S&P 500 P/E got down to 6 in 1949 (http://www.lowrisk.com/sp500pe.htm). Surely things will get at least as bad as 1949 so why does Nouriel only expect the P/E to fall to 10-12?
blindman • January 15th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
http://verbewarp.blogspot.com/search?q=extremis.Apathy! It’s the human state at the top of the Bell Curve when the “Attentional Span” switches off, relaxes or reaches ‘stability’ and the individual survival instinct modes shuts down. It is the turning point and time for ‘stability’ to begin to morph, in accordance with due scientific process, into ‘instability’ as defined in Physics, by the Laws of Thermodynamics; in medical or biological terms it is called “extremis”. It’s also in accord with the Laws of Economics, as stated by Nobel laureate Hymen Minski. The accelerating downhill slide of the cyclic curve awaits the abyss.
anton kleinschmidt • January 15th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
I agree…this all sounds far too plausible for comfort
anton kleinschmidt • January 16th, 2009 at 12:13 am
There is much valuable input in this and all the other NR posts but I cannot help feeling that in all the complexity we are all ignoring some very basic realities. At a very simple level:BANKS are designed to intermediate between savers and borrowers and provide loans which will eventually be repaid.STOCK EXCHANGES are designed to provide business with access to capitalDating back to before the Great Depression we have allowed an assortment of predatory types and snake oil salesmen to subvert the fundamental activities of these two pillars of the capitalist model. These predators include politicians, imbedded economists, imbedded academics, bankers, investment bankers, derivative makers, short sellers, day traders, hedge fund operators, Ponzi operators, gung ho marketeers, etc.As a result of these predatory activities private citizens across the world have lost all confidence in the BANKS and STOCK EXCHANGES. Until such time as these private citizens regain confidence in these two institutions there is little hope of meaningful recovery.In other words step one is to deal with the predators and neutralize their profoundly negative effect on global economic wellbeing. Now and in the future!
Yve • January 16th, 2009 at 2:50 am
I was wondering, he just hasn’t used that trademark “BOOM BABY!!’”. I kind of miss it
.
Guest • January 16th, 2009 at 4:23 am
i am nobody to comment here but i think USA will resolve this problem by bankrupting all its citizens.No need to worry
David • January 16th, 2009 at 5:33 am
“the excesses of capitalism and the exploitation of workers during that period.” excess to Capitalism???? “This “great thinker” could not decipher the difference between failure of human nature, and failure of capitolism. Thus he put more power in a group which led to far more human failure, and millions slaughtered.
Andrew G. Bernhardt • January 16th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Global financial (and economic) catastraphe here we come! Total USA default (of the US Dollar & the fixed income) here we come!
Anonymous • January 16th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
Setting aside my doubts that this anecdote is actually true, I have to disagree with its premise.All politicians are offering ice cream to their target (be it business, labor, wooden arrow makers, defense contractors or environmentalists.) And there’s been plenty of ice cream, in a variety of flavors, doled out by presidents from both major parties to their supporters. To suggest that Obama’s supporters are wide-eyed, sugar-starved children is rather simple-minded.Obama’s tax plan (the one he ran on) will not help me personally, and will likely hurt me. Yet I voted for him anyway, passing up the ice cream that McCain was offering. I voted not out of narrow self-interest, but with the belief that Obama’s vision for the country and the way he promised to lead (which he so far has) would benefit us all in the long term.If Olivia does in fact exist, please pass along my congratulations, and maybe spend a little more time guiding her in her presidential duties than exploiting her story for cheap political points.
Yve • January 17th, 2009 at 1:24 am
I thank you for your kind offer OuterBeltway. I’m afraid that my limited knowledge of the markets and finance in general leaves me with little to offer. I came to this blog to learn and I must say that it has been an invaluable resource due the depth of analysis and outstanding contributions of people such as yourself. I would like to thank you all for your diligence, fair & reasoned commentary & the continued edification of the little people like me. I look forward to your posts every day. If there was something concrete that I could bring to the table, I would love to take part.
btd • January 20th, 2009 at 9:16 pm
MA,Do you still believe 8000 is a reasonable buying range given the fact that now the XLF has broken Nov 21 lows? The financials have the led the downturn, so if they made a new low, that signals the market may have not made its low either? Also, there are several technical factors indicating we need a strong finish to Januar or we’re screwed both short and LONG term, do you consider any of this to be of importance? The only positive I see with regard to this bottom test OR break is that volume is relatively low. Its kinda like walking up to a cliff, if you tip toe(low volume), you can look over the edge and walk away. If you sprint up to the cliff(high volume), you more then likely go flying off!














