EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

Latest Project Syndicate column: “Will Banks and Financial Markets Recover in 2009?”

Project Syndicate has just published my latest column titled “Will Banks and Financial Markets Recover in 2009?” The simple answer to this question is no.

The details can be found in the full text of this column:

NEW YORK – Global financial markets in 2008 experienced their worst crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930′s. Major financial institutions went bust; others were bought up on the cheap or survived only after major bailouts. Global stock markets fell by more than 50%; interest-rate spreads skyrocketed; a severe liquidity and credit crunch appeared; and many emerging-market economies staggered to the International Monetary Fund for help.

So what lies ahead in 2009? Is the worst behind us or ahead of us? To answer these questions, we must understand that a vicious circle of economic contraction and worsening financial conditions is underway.

The United States will certainly experience its worst recession in decades, a deep and protracted contraction lasting about 24 months through the end of 2009. Moreover, the entire global economy will contract. There will be recession in the euro zone, the United Kingdom, Continental Europe, Canada, Japan, and the other advanced economies. There is also a risk of a hard landing for emerging-market economies, as trade, financial, and currency links transmit real and financial shocks to them.

In the advanced economies, recession had brought back earlier in 2008 fears of 1970′s-style stagflation (a combination of economic stagnation and inflation). But, with aggregate demand falling below growing aggregate supply, slack goods markets will lead to lower inflation as firms’ pricing power is restrained. Likewise, rising unemployment will control labor costs and wage growth. These factors, combined with sharply falling commodity prices, will cause inflation in advanced economies to ease toward the 1% level, raising concerns about deflation, not stagflation.

Deflation is dangerous as it leads to a liquidity trap: nominal policy rates cannot fall below zero, so monetary policy becomes ineffective. Falling prices mean that the real cost of capital is high and the real value of nominal debts rise, leading to further declines in consumption and investment – and thus setting in motion a vicious circle in which incomes and jobs are squeezed further, aggravating the fall in demand and prices.

As traditional monetary policy becomes ineffective, other unorthodox policies will continue to be used: policies to bail out investors, financial institutions, and borrowers; massive provision of liquidity to banks in order to ease the credit crunch; and even more radical actions to reduce long-term interest rates on government bonds and narrow the spread between market rates and government bonds.

Today’s global crisis was triggered by the collapse of the US housing bubble, but it was not caused by it. America’s credit excesses were in residential mortgages, commercial mortgages, credit cards, auto loans, and student loans. There was also excess in the securitized products that converted these debts into toxic financial derivatives; in borrowing by local governments; in financing for leveraged buyouts that should never have occurred; in corporate bonds that will now suffer massive losses in a surge of defaults; in the dangerous and unregulated credit default swap market.

Moreover, these pathologies were not confined to the US. There were housing bubbles in many other countries, fueled by excessive cheap lending that did not reflect underlying risks. There was also a commodity bubble and a private equity and hedge funds bubble. Indeed, we now see the demise of the shadow banking system, the complex of non-bank financial institutions that looked like banks as they borrowed short term and in liquid ways, leveraged a lot, and invested in longer term and illiquid ways.

As a result, the biggest asset and credit bubble in human history is now going bust, with overall credit losses likely to be close to a staggering $2 trillion. Thus, unless governments rapidly recapitalize financial institutions, the credit crunch will become even more severe as losses mount faster than recapitalization and banks are forced to contract credit and lending.

Equity prices and other risky assets have fallen sharply from their peaks of late 2007, but there are still significant downside risks. An emerging consensus suggests that the prices of many risky assets – including equities – have fallen so much that we are at the bottom and a rapid recovery will occur.

But the worst is still ahead of us. In the next few months, the macroeconomic news and earnings/profits reports from around the world will be much worse than expected, putting further downward pressure on prices of risky assets, because equity analysts are still deluding themselves that the economic contraction will be mild and short.

While the risk of a total systemic financial meltdown has been reduced by the actions of the G-7 and other economies to backstop their financial systems, severe vulnerabilities remain. The credit crunch will get worse; deleveraging will continue, as hedge funds and other leveraged players are forced to sell assets into illiquid and distressed markets, thus causing more price falls and driving more insolvent financial institutions out of business. A few emerging-market economies will certainly enter a full-blown financial crisis.

So 2009 will be a painful year of global recession and further financial stresses, losses, and bankruptcies. Only aggressive, coordinated, and effective policy actions by advanced and emerging-market countries can ensure that the global economy recovers in 2010, rather than entering a more protracted period of economic stagnation.

Nouriel Roubini is Professor of Economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University and Chairman of RGE Monitor (www.rgemonitor.com), an economic and financial consultancy.

© Project Syndicate 1995-2008

395 Responses to “Latest Project Syndicate column: “Will Banks and Financial Markets Recover in 2009?””

FAMCDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:23 am

“But the worst is still ahead of us. In the next few months, the macroeconomic news and earnings/profits reports from around the world will be much worse than expected, putting further downward pressure on prices of risky assets, because equity analysts are still deluding themselves that the economic contraction will be mild and short.”Concering bailouts:Does anyone knows some article explaining exactly what types of FED operations are being used, how this affects bank balances (asset/liabilities – specific account changes) and what are the maturities and amounts involved?Or is FED still hiding all details ?

jomosDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:28 am

200 year chart of the DOW/GOLD ratio which was at 70:1 in 1999 is going to trend towards a ratio of 1:1 in the next decade. (DOW 1000:GOLD 1000 or DOW 5000:GOLD 5000) What say you ?

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:33 am

Just as long as it’s Melamine freeRhodia Shuts Europe’s Last Paracetamol (Tylenol) Plant as China PrevailsDec. 30 (Bloomberg) — The last “Made in Europe” paracetamol, the painkiller sold as Panadol and Tylenol, will roll off a conveyer belt in France tomorrow.Rhodia SA, the world’s second-largest paracetamol producer, will close the 43-employee factory in Roussillon, southern France, because of competition from China and India, leaving Europe reliant entirely on imports of the drug. For Lelia Foata, a 32-year-old mother of two who lives near Paris, that’s a worry. “http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=az9ShNouwC8U&refer=home

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:06 am

RALLY NEWS!10:00 a.m.U.S. December consumer confidence below 45.8 expected10:00 a.m.U.S. December consumer confidence 38 vs 44.7 in November10:00 a.m.U.S. December consumer confidence at record low

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:08 am

The policy actions NR talks about will eventually destroy the economy. Economical growth is not eaqual to the amount of money central banks can create.If these policy actions would work then I cant see anything stopping a realy, realy poor country like Haiti to adopt them and become as rich as any

CMDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:21 am

SSO about ready to break out! A gap above $25 means big rally this way headeth! Can’t have the dow finish worse than 1907!! That was the second worst year ever for stocks and we are a mere 1% above that level. PPT will not let it happen.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:34 am

Its bad and getting worse!This much I know, my friends, families and neighbours are unable to pay their bills. Some can’t even keep their cars anymore.2009? It will be painful. Very painful. WE ARE NOT prepared for this type of lifestyle. that will make it much worse.Goodluck all. Don’t spend the few bucks you have.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:45 am

If everyone had a printing press in their office and could print as much money as they wanted in exchange for IOUs (bonds) that would never be paid ($10.6 trillion national debt and rapidly expanding), then all would be fine? Isn’t this exactly what our govt is doing? How does this make any sense? Even NR is not addressing the long term consequences of this! Could someone explain this to me?

MADecember 30th, 2008 at 9:46 am

From the prior days post, there were some people questioning the “Petraeus pick” as most influential…You are all entitled to your opinions, as am I. I have an acquaintance in the US military intelligence (whom is worthy of that moniker, as he is an extremely bright man), whom I have spoken about Petraeus at great length to. (I trust his opinions, and he has met the man.)In his words, Petraeus is a genius! He is not a guns blazing leader… but instead, comes from the Macarthur school of thought where, instead of kicking down doors, help build them. Talk with the people. Help them. That is how to win this “war”. His “surge” wasn’t about putting more troops on the ground that could shoot more guns. It was about “presence”, “support” and “aid”. It was about winning over people and their trust.We need his presence back in the US!!! Or at least the model that he represents, as we need to win back the faith of Americans and fight the corrupt and greedy excess. Don’t get me wrong… I’m not saying Petraeus would help our economy, but instead I’m saying he does seem to stand for what made this country great, and unlike other “leaders”, has been willing to “wear the uniform” and prove himself.As far as the many other “retired generals” during the Bush Admin… It’s my understanding that they many of them had received their title through political maneuvering, nepotism, and various other ways that left them severely UNDERQUALIFIED to lead, plan and carry out an ACTUAL WAR. They pretty much only knew the drop bombs and kick down doors method… which leaves you with an enemy that will look for vengeance. Many of these Generals were forced to retire… and some understood their shortcomings and knew enough to get out.As a huge fan of Nouriel, it’s hard for me to cast a vote against him…. but I begrudgingly agree on the Petraeus pick in a landslide!All the best,Miss America

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:50 am

I’m sorry but “put an honest person in a corrupt system and he becomes a pawn of the corruption or he is expelled from the system”, simple as that!

CaponeDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:55 am

All, I am working on my attitude at work trying to be grateful, but when I see this it makes it tough… I laid this book on the Trustee’s desk where I work. He did not read it, ignored it and now out of pride is not interested in a single thought i have on the economy and markets since he lost his ass… ayeI hope it was ok for me to drop Kindelberger’s name and book title here again and again a while back…Happy New Year!http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a8KK_pGpxqL4&refer=homeMerrill’s Rosenberg Inspired by Farrell in Foreseeing CrashBy Carlos TorresDec. 30 (Bloomberg) — David Rosenberg drew on inspiration from market-rules theorist Robert Farrell and asset-bubble historian Charles Kindleberger to predict the economy’s demise this year….Kindleberger, the late economic historian who taught for 33 years at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is famed for his 1978 book “Manias, Panics and Crashes.” The work traced four centuries of boom-and-bust cycles, bringing to light a 17th century frenzy over Dutch tulips that sent investors offering land, houses, farm animals and gold in return for choice bulbs.

ex VRWCDecember 30th, 2008 at 10:05 am

Wow Roubini is back to sounding more bearish all the time. I think even he sees that nothing the Fed or the Treasury or the world central banks can do will turn back the economic tsunami we face. Simply put, they cannot create capital, they can only create credit. However, credit and liquidity are not the problem. Solvency is. Or rather the definition of solvency. We allowed the definition of solvency to become that an entity had enough access to credit to satisfy cash flow. Therefore, many (most?) entities are not solvent when you look at a more traditional method of measuring it (say the balance sheet, for instance).Therefore, the continued application of bailouts aimed at increasing credit (like funding GMAC so they can ‘lend again’) will not work. Because the consumers they want to borrow are insolvent. And in fact, they have been insolvent for a very long time. They are insolvent, they are finally realizing it, and they will not be buying a car anytime soon. They realize that borrowing to buy a car is just about the last thing they would consider right now.This is why the deleveraging is and will continue to be so painful. Because, like frogs in a pot, we have reached a fatal boiling point, and we never even realized our jeopardy until way too late. No surprise NR is bearish, in my opinion.ex VRWC

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 10:20 am

With Needed Cash, GMAC Will Ease Lending Rules

GMAC, the automobile financing company, said Tuesday morning that it would immediately resume financing to a wider range of car buyers, a day after the Treasury Department injected billions of dollars into the lender.GMAC said in a statement that it would modify its credit criteria to include financing for customers with a credit score of 621 or above, a significant expansion of credit compared with the 700 minimum score put in place two months ago. GMAC had significantly cut back on the number of loans it offered as it struggled to stay afloat.And General Motors said Tuesday that it would begin to offer zero-percent financing on some models as it tries to jump-start sales.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/31/business/31auto.html?hp

PeteCADecember 30th, 2008 at 10:45 am

Some Thoughts – Steps in the CrisisA few thoughts about the US economy this year.The first is a comment about the surprising amount of underlying weakness in the US economy. When the credit crisis began in 2008, many (sensible) commentators advocated the idea that the crisis would play out in a series of waves. In other words, economic declines followed by re-bounds in the US economy. But the really surprising thing is the serious downturn in Americas since the third quarter of 2008. The “second wave” of the credit crisis really swept the rug out from under the economic health of America. Since then, there has been tremendous underlying weakness in the stock market and the economy in general. Normally, the statistics would say that a substantial bear market rally should have occurred by now – esp. given the enormous drop in the Dow in 2008. But any support for a strong rally has fizzled – as new signs of economic weakness arise. It is clear now that the USA has sunk into a potentially serious economic condition – a condition that was only sustained by low interest rate policies from the Fed for more than a decade before. Real US competitiveness in the global economy is low, and America must undergo major restructuring to get on a sound footing again. It is tremendously disappointing to me personally that both the Gov’t and the Fed seem to believe that the way out of this mess is through monetary policies. All we see are bailouts with money that does not exist. Nowhere do we see current (or future) administrations doing the really serious economic thinking that would put America back on its feet in a credible way. That is troubling.The second thought has to do with the Fed actions this year. Ben Bernanke certainly came through with his promise to “avoid the mistakes of the last Fed”. I am, of course, talking about the Fed’s old actions during 1929-1933 depression. Mr Bernanke has opened a floodgate of liquidity and asset swaps – the likes of which America has never seen before. While it’s probably true that the Fed has avoided a major collapse of the banking system, still we have to wonder what could possibly be giving them the confidence to believe they can take such enormous steps. The Fed is involved in nothing less than a huge concept of financial engineering. They are trying to paper over the enormous structural problems in the US economy through excessive policy steps. This is a force majeure in economic policies – but without any reliable precendent. It presupposes that the Fed actually knows what it is doing. But how can Mr Bernanke possibly conceive of the implications of these steps – when there is no precedent of policy to guide the current actions?My third thought is simply that investors are now fleeing risk. Clearly, many people are becoming uncomfortable with high-risk hedge funds. Very likely we will see many more redemptions in January 2009, and more deleveraging. Some of this money may eventually work its way back to mutual funds, where a policy of lower returns at lower risks becomes more attractive. That is likely to be a significant shift in investing behavior over the next few years.Finally, let me introduce a thought. The credit crisis began as a mortgage crisis – morphing into a major disaster in the US banking and financial sectors. The next step – which is playing out now – is a transition to major weakness in the global economy. Decreases in consumer spending, layoffs, bankruptcies and foreclosures. Countries that had major housing bubbles, such as the USA, UK and Spain, will be particularly affected by the downturn. But the question is … what’s next? I would suggest that the third wave of the credit crisis could be summarized by a new word. Conflict. The global financial losses have been so enormous, and sufficiently serious, that the political stability of some countries is now threatened. Conflict will make itself felt through economic competition, where nations use tariffs and trade barriers to protect their vital interests. Conflict will make itself felt through proxy wars over resources, or crises that are deliberately generated to push up the price of important resources like oil. And ultimately conflict may make itself felt through war – new regional conflicts that grow in scope and have potentially serious consequences. The world is struggling for adequate resources, energy, food and water. It’s likely that we could have found solutions to these problems if money had been directed towards long-term investments that created new technolgies. But instead, policies that promote loose liquidity, high-risk trading profiles, enormous growth of derivatives trading, and short-term investing have caused a huge misallocation of capital in the world. The explosion of greed on Wall Street has sown the seeds for war. Even now, at this late date, there is still pitiful progress by politicians and bankers to fix the real problems with the global economy.PeteCA

CMDecember 30th, 2008 at 10:49 am

Stocks up 6% over the next 2 days in a PPT goose job to make the sheeple forget about the continual rape job being thrust upon them by the most corrupt leadership/business relationship in US history. I am goin glong lube!

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:11 am

Look on the bright side, The US government is investing your money in GM so how does it feel to be part owner in GM? See it’s not all bad. Oh and even better yet the list is growing day by day so I figure the windfall profits will mean early retirement and leisure for us all, even for those who don’t pay taxes.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:13 am

Another reason we will see conflict is due to the fact that in the Spring the laborer will realized the bailout of the capitalist was to insure the continuation of the status quo of those who wield power and gain over the laborer. As a result, when these policies lead to the job loss and bankruptcy of the laborer, he will rise up in strikes and conflict with the capitalist. The same will be played out at a national level when the laborers – China, Russia – will rise up against the capitalist – America. As the corruption and greed of the capitalist become more and more evident watch for strikes, mobs, and rumors of war.

ex VRWCDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:17 am

New name for GM – Ben and Hank’s Auto BarnCome on over to Ben and Hank’s Auto Barn. Slow credit, no credit, no pulse, no problem.Come get your new car. Runs good.If Hank can’t get you financed, no one can.This is what we are reduced to, pimping car loans to bad borrowers with taxpayer dollars.I suggest we all stop by our local Ban and Hanks dealer. We should say: ‘Look Hank, I don’t want a car. I just stopped by to empty my pockets so you would have more to lend out’.ex VRWC

PeteCADecember 30th, 2008 at 11:30 am

Dan: Just some thoughts. If I am right, you should see some immediate consequences in 2009. The USA is confronted by an immediate threat – the possibility of disintegration in Iraq and the idea that Iran and Iraq could become allies (or evolve to become one greater Shiite nation). Such a development is enormously threatening to America and the Saudi’s because of its implications on oil supplies. Every US president tackles those problems that he can solve … and leaves the unsolved crises to the next president. President Obama must decide how to deal with Iran. We will see that play out in the immediate future. But more generally, as American power subsides I expect new patterns of global behavior (incl. war) to play out over the next 5-10 years. Unfortunately, during that time period we will see past mistakes evolve into new threats. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have created an atmosphere of insecurity and terror. Possibly we will see newer and stronger terrorist groups in the future, and the use of nuclear, chemical or biological weapons becomes a likely possibility. Not all things are negative. An emergence of China as a growing power may cause a shift in the global balance (diifcult for America), but will add regional stability in its own way. I would like to hope that Pres. Obama will move the USA back to a “rule of law”, but he has very difficult circumstances to cope with. It may not be that simple.PeteCA

aerial viewDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:33 am

THE ANSWER: reduce the size and scope (interference) and power of govt, the amount of debt (borrowing) while enforcing regulation and increasing transparency of Wall Street and the FED. Instead, we have the exact OPPOSITE happening to maintain the status quo! If Americans cannot unite for these principles, then it’s every man for himself and we all know where that leads: “divide and conquer”!

Jason BDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:37 am

Great work, PeteCA. I’d like to comment on your 2nd and 4th paragraph.Fed actions this year basically transferred the garbage assets from the banks to the fed. Now the fed will transfer the problem to the treasury. As a result a crisis in the dollar is unavoidable, in my opinion.What’s next? I think defaults. Corporate defaults, municipal defaults, families in bankruptcy and foreclosure, countries defaulting, maybe even the US. These bad debts have to be worked through, the faster the better. Bush passed the buck to Obama, but the inevitable outcome is unavoidable. Wars too. The world is on a hair trigger. It will be a wonder if we make it throught the next 20 years, but isn’t it always ;)

JimmyTheBankerDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am

From BeSpoke, if you don’t believe my work, here you go!Estimated Earnings Growth for the S&P 500Below we highlight historical earnings growth estimates for the S&P 500 for Q4 2008 and full-year 2009. As shown, EPS estimates have dropped sharply over the last few months, and analysts are currently expecting the S&P 500 to see year-over-year earnings fall by 12% in the fourth quarter. At the start of September, analysts were actually expecting growth of 40%, which was largely because financial companies were expected to bounce back from a very poor Q4 in 2007. Instead, these companies are struggling much more than they were at this time last year.Estimates for 2009 have been dropping significantly as well. Back in September, analysts were expecting 2009 earnings growth of 24.7% versus 2008. But estimates are now at just 4.5%, and judging by the current trend, analysts will be looking for negative 2009 growth in no time.

FAMCDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:04 pm

“All we see are bailouts with money that does not exist. Nowhere do we see current (or future) administrations doing the really serious economic thinking that would put America back on its feet in a credible way.”Great synthesis, Pete.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:05 pm

A funny from Ritholtz,Scene: U of Chicago economics class taught by Milton Friedman…After a late night of studying, a student falls asleep in class. This sent Friedman into a tizzy and he came over and pounded on the desk, demanding an answer to a question he had just posed. The student, shaken but now awake says “I’m sorry Professor, I missed the question — but the answer is increase the money supply…”

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

Yes, but you are only a guest. Don’t you think you should have used your real name so everyone would know you are first?

JimmyTheBankerDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:32 pm

If you do nothing, you can say nothing. If you allow it, you condone it…A former top executive at Merrill Lynch who received a $25 million golden parachute after just three months of work has purchased a $37 million Park Avenue palace.Peter Kraus, 55, paid the staggering sum for a five-bedroom co-op on New York’s posh Park Avenue after getting a $25 million buyout from Merrill Lynch when the company was sold to Bank of America in September, the New York Post reported.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:34 pm

The anecdotal evidence is all around us and has been for some time.- noticeably lighter rush hour traffic- fewer cars at the mall- sales galore- well established businesses closing- all but a dead stop in real estate sales- layoffs of highly educated and skilled workers- maxed out middle class and upper middle class people paying for essentials with credit cards

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:38 pm

PeteCA,It is with deep regret that I find myself in agreement with the predictions that you pose. There are few industries which the government influences more that Defense. At time of severe economic hardship, growing employment through expending defense projects is far more effective then creating a new industry such as green collar workers. Further, growing peace implies the need to employ soldiers returning home looking for a new path in life. Our economy can hardly absorb this influx of skilled, hard working individuals in its current state. The political and economic momentum is clearly with the war mongerers…unfortunately.

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:43 pm

NEW YORK, May 5, 2008 — Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (NYSE: MER) today announced that Peter S. Kraus, 55, has been appointed executive vice president and a member of the firm’s Management Committee. Mr. Kraus will report to John A. Thain, chairman and CEO of Merrill Lynch. Mr. Kraus will be responsible for overseeing the firm’s business strategy and investments; global growth plans and opportunities, and corporate acquisitions. He will also lead initiatives to integrate the work of the corporate strategy and business development team with the efforts of the firm’s senior business leaders around the world to identify cross-platform synergies.”Peter Kraus will be a tremendous resource to me and the senior management team in identifying the best opportunities for growth and investment around the world,” said Mr.Thain. “Peter’s two decades of experience in the financial markets, including in investment banking, asset management, and private wealth management, will be a great asset to Merrill Lynch.”Most recently, Mr. Kraus was with Goldman Sachs Group Inc. for over 22 years where he was co-head of the Investment Management Division (IMD), and a member of the Management Committee. Mr. Kraus was also head of firmwide strategy and chairman of the Strategy Committee. Before joining IMD, Mr. Kraus was co-head of the Financial Institutions Group (FIG) until 2001.

jomosDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:46 pm

This is how I see the central banks of the world action. They are like a train traveling on a single track. They get a warning call that if they proceed at the same speed they will crash with an oncoming train. So instead of stopping and avoiding the oncoming train, they choose to gun the engines full blast and try to beat the oncoming train before it reaches them. Risky behavior, we try to stop our teenagers from emulating.True ?

economicminorDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:50 pm

Roubini has been correct about the financial crisis facing the US and the world for more than a couple of years. He says that there will be no recovery in 2009. His reasoning is that deflation, or falling asset values will continue and monetary policy from the central banks has run to into the wall of zero interest rates (ZIRP) where they can do no more to stimulate. They have also run out of in house assets to throw into the mix. It will now be up to Congress and the Treasury to monetize debts or in plain English > Print Dollars or create them purely out of thin air.House prices fell 18% last year. The stock market fell about 40%. Retail sales are falling, oil and most commodities have fallen in price. Debt supporting all this has collapsed and is collapsing. This is a deflationary spiral downward. Money in the system or the value of the assets that is the basis for value in a fiat system is falling. All the money injected so far has been inadequate to prevent this from continuing.Roubini see us correcting the out of control system and getting it back on the road. I just can not see the mechanism the Keynesians are using being able to stop deflation in an extremely overly indebted system. My mind goes back to the charts I have seen about debt to GDP. We have almost twice the debt per GDP as we did in 1929. That crash caused the Great Depression. We had, on the books, almost twice that much and that doesn’t count all the other promises (agreed upon obligations).Roubini thinks that the FED and Treasury and the Obama crew will be able to successfully fight the deflationary cycle and stop it. I think that after 25 years of overly optimistic expectations for Boomer retirement, that the deflation from the last year and the deflation from next year will significantly reduce the speculative optimism of the Boomers and they will be selling, down sizing and saving. I think that pension funds all across the board will be forced to reduce their outlays due to their losses and that the banks who survive will have many fewer parties willing to borrow which will keep their profits and margins minimal. Retail sales will be poor and even if Obama gets a stimulus package right away, it isn’t likely to do anything for a while, while deflation continues. Besides his projection on jobs created is less than the jobs already lost. Not much of a stimulus IMO all the while states, counties and cities cut… And if you can create all these jobs with out income, why should anyone work, let’s just live off printed money for ever! But if you think this is possible, just look towards Zimbabwe or the past Weimar Republic for your answer.Roubini has been right but IMO has been very much on the careful side. He has had to expand his forecasts all along the way. He projects what he can see thru data but does not interpolate that into probabilities. What I am saying is that he didn’t predict deflation a year ago or even the extent of the losses or the current depth of the recession. He has been ahead of all his contemporaries or many of them but he is not saying depression. He is only predicting a deep recession lasting now 24 months. That doesn’t mean he won’t. His pattern has been to continually expand his forecasts as the data comes in to verify.Our job as investors or people just trying to stay ahead of or out of the way of these rapid changes is to interpolate into probabilities that we can use. Remember PROBABILITIES are no guarantees. They are best guesses. That means don’t marry a direction and put your money down and go away. The only thing constant is Change!I have read and thought a lot about Boomers and the psychology of economics. The Boomers will be a major influence on the US economy for another 20 years. The Keynesians think that they can control the markets by controlling the money supply via interest rates and fractional reserve requirements and such. I agree that under most circumstances the effect of pulling on this lever or pushing that button works. We are passing thru a very chaotic period, partially due to the Boomers.The system has been gaming the Boomers for the last 25 years. There was no way to make money in a savings account due to low interest rates and taxes for the last 20 years, Boomers had few choices on where to save for retirement. Some just gave up and didn’t’ try. Most tried and the main source was thru 401ks, SEPs and IRAs with others in government and corporate pension plans. These were mostly highly controlled by others (the financial industry), had high costs attached and were highly gamed by the system. This concentration of assets was directed at first into mutual funds. Then into the dot.com boom and then by the Madoffs and the Hedge funds. A lot of this money has gone into mal investments or eaten up by the managers. When transparency is again gained, Boomers are going to be really sad and then mad.. In the last years, Boomers were full participants in the housing boom as finally a chance to *make* some money for their retirement. This was also a monetary scam by the same financial industry that wasted away much of their retirement savings thru the equity market manipulations. Today over 40% of existing mortgages are underwater and by the end of 2009 it will be over 60%. Stocks are down 40% from their peaks too. Boomers will not be able to rely upon their homes or their stock portfolios for their retirement … This will affect their psychology going forward.Why do I think the Boomers are in trouble for retirement? Because IF you finally got transparency, the real value of our economy would be significantly smaller. Take out all the money from financial engineering and money changing and extraneous retail sales from a smaller economy and continued deflationary influences and the picture for them as a group looks bleak. The Boomers have been screwed blue and many will be forced to work until they drop, others will be homeless if they don’t have children to take care of them. Social Security? Medicare? Are extremely underfunded and their *surpluses* are not there. Been *borrowed* (off the books) and spent. So the gubbermint will just replace that with the printing press?If we don’t get transparency? I think things get worse faster as our economic system is based on faith, Faith you’ll do what you say and faith that the books are not Madoffed. The faith has been destroyed.This trust is a key element in the psychology going forward IMO. People who never cared about their retirement savings are now paying attention and are concerned with safety. This goes against the psychology of speculation. People believed that they could invest and have a guaranteed returns, whether it be in an IRA or a house. Both have lost their glitter in the last years and IF Roubini and I and etal are correct and deflation continues thru the next year plus, the psychology of guaranteed returns will vanish and speculation will diminish and so will the banking industry’s ability to make money from lending and then financially engineering the debts. Once faith is lost, it will take a really long time to be regained I think.The other scenario is that we eventually have high inflation rates as money is just printed to fill in all the gaps. I don’t think that anything they can do will be adequate to counter balance the collapsing debts. That is my best guess, an opinion. Maybe they can but it isn’t the right thing to do. If you don’t understand the implications you should. It is not good. Neither case is good. One leads to some form or real base and eventual revival. The other leads to Argentina or Zimbabwe or the Weimar Republic in the early 1920’s. Where money is based on nothing real. It is just paper. Can we just return to somewhere in the middle? Probably not.. Why? Think of the economic policy as a car swerving out of control on a crooked road. When the swings were small, it was somewhat easier to bring back under control but now that they have continued to push harder on the accelerator and spinning the wheels, the swings and corrections just kept getting bigger. Swing to the left, over correct, swing to the right, way over correct…. Can it be pulled out of the slide? Not with the drivers we have at the controls now. They have been madly swinging the wheel for years now and the car just gets more and more out of control as ZIRP and $4 trillion injected shows. So we either spin out or crash right or left. If we just spin out would be the best but that still means stopping and re-orienting ourselves and starting over (end of deflationary cycle). Crashing, or hyper inflation, would be the worse case but the most probable because those who rule are all of the same schools and re-enforce each other’s incorrect thinking. No one wants a correction. All they can see is steering and accelerating.So IMO deflation is the most likely scenario going forward for at least the next year but more likely two. It will go on until the debt based on mal investment and unrealistic expectations have been mostly wiped out, either by write downs or high inflation. By then the stimulus from Obama’s crew should be putting in a floor. This will be multi faceted in that interest rates will be higher and taxes lower for the middle class. Much depends upon what Obama spends the capital on and how much debt he is forced to take on. If he wastes it on digging holes and filling them back up, then the gains (bottom) will be temporary. If he pushes forward with real change in energy infrastructure and things like high speed rail to move people and products across this country with efficient speed then we may move back into a long road of gaining prosperity. But either way, I do not see printing money to support financial engineering and mal investment as positive. It must end sooner rather than later as the more debt, the longer it will take to regain prosperity. Someone has to pay. It is the law of physics and money. There are no perpetual motion machines.This doesn’t mean we still can’t have a hope rally for the first couple of months into 2009. If we do, be careful not to marry your positions. The future is the future and no one can read it but for the near term, holding cash appears to be the best bet unless you trade the possible rally with fairly tight stops.Have a Happy New Year’s eve and a safe and successful 2009.Best Regards and thanks to the Professor for providing this forum. It is by far my favorite reading each day.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:50 pm

In what could possibly be the biggest ‘too little, too late’ moment of the century, the SEC announced today that it halted a $23 million Ponzi scheme targeted at Haitian-Americans. How this one was detected, while the $50 billion Madoff scheme slipped through the cracks is beyond us (Bespoke).

FAMCDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:54 pm

im not agree with some NR solutions or other varriant oflend-cheap-money-to-FED-good-friends orbuy-with-population-money-the-trash-of-FED-friends.Roubini knows the problem. In fact, read the excerpt below (long term consequences as you wrote):”The long-term consequences of the resulting surge in fiscal deficits are serious. If the deficits are monetized by central banks, inflation will follow the short-term deflationary pressures; if they are financed by debt, the long-term solvency of some governments may be at stake unless medium-term fiscal discipline is restored.”(Nouriel Roubini – Dec 16 Commentary)

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 12:56 pm

http://www.investinginbonds.com/assets/files/Intro_to_Credit_Derivatives.pdf.THE J.P. MORGAN GUIDETO CREDIT DERIVATIVESWith Contributions from the RiskMetrics GroupPublished by..Credit Derivatives are continuing to enjoy major growth in the financial markets, aidedand abetted by sophisticated product development and the expansion of productapplications beyond price management to the strategic management of portfolio risk. AsBlythe Masters, global head of credit derivatives marketing at J.P. Morgan in New Yorkpoints out: “In bypassing barriers between different classes, maturities, rating categories,debt seniority levels and so on, credit derivatives are creating enormous opportunities toexploit and profit from associated discontinuities in the pricing of credit risk”.With such intense and rapid product development Risk Publications is delighted tointroduce the first Guide to Credit Derivatives, a joint project with J.P. Morgan, apioneer in the use of credit derivatives, with contributions from the RiskMetrics Group,a leading provider of risk management research, data, software, and education.The guide will be of great value to risk managers addressing portfolio concentration risk,issuers seeking to minimise the cost of liquidity in the debt capital markets and investorspursuing assets that offer attractive relative value..?..http://www.zealllc.com/2002/jpmgrows.htm..JPM Derivatives Monster Grows.Please note that the numbers in this quote are from the Q1 OCC report, and are far worse now as we noted above! As I mentioned in Monster, the doomed LTCM had an inverted derivatives pyramid of an estimated $1,250b supported by only $3b in owners’ capital for an extreme implied leverage ratio of 417 to 1. JPM’s implied derivatives-to-equity ratio was sitting at 712 to 1 at the end of Q3 2001, a staggering number beyond comprehension!.JP Morgan, Enron & Gold.http://www.fgmr.com/morgan-enron.htm.have today mailed the following letter to the Enforcement Division of the Securities & Exchange Commission. It’s about time that we learn the truth regarding JP Morgan Chase’s activity in the gold market, the full extent of its gold exposure, and whether it used gold loans to fund the so-called “disguised loans” that it arranged for Enron. Perhaps the SEC will help us learn the truth by investigating these matters and reporting the results..http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/8036/banksnb6.png.liquidity trap central?

DocBergDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:01 pm

What I see happening in the attempts to come up with policies to address the financial crisis is a bias towards “saving” failed and poorly managed but barely surviving institutions, while carefully avoiding dealing with the much larger and more important problems afflicting the members of the public. Indeed, while one of the main problems that led to this mess is concentration of financial power in ever fewer hands, leading to moral hazards, the bailout funds are apparently being used to further consolidate economic power. I see no ways that this is going to fix the underlying problems, but only make them worse. From my non-professional viewpoint, we would be much further ahead by breaking up geographic and corporate concentrations of economic power and at the same time writing down the values of overly inflated collateral. There are good reasons for having bankruptcy institutions, and they have proven their value in the past. I understand why the elite will fight this, but it is the really only workable way out of this crisis.

jomosDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:06 pm

When the budding retiree’s get spooked, all those no touch 401k’s will be redeemed at just the wrong time.

MADecember 30th, 2008 at 1:14 pm

p.s. The “end game” theory that I postulated a year and a half ago was named: My “soc-boom-K-owed” theory. I still find it catchy and appropriate.

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:15 pm

Wall Street Lays Another Eggby Niall Ferguson VanityFair December 2008

Not so long ago, the dollar stood for a sum of gold, and bankers knew the people they lent to. The author charts the emergence of an abstract, even absurd world—call it Planet Finance—where mathematical models ignored both history and human nature, and value had no meaning. This year we have lived through something more than a financial crisis. We have witnessed the death of a planet. Call it Planet Finance. Two years ago, in 2006, the measured economic output of the entire world was worth around $48.6 trillion. The total market capitalization of the world’s stock markets was $50.6 trillion, 4 percent larger. The total value of domestic and international bonds was $67.9 trillion, 40 percent larger. Planet Finance was beginning to dwarf Planet Earth.Planet Finance seemed to spin faster, too. Every day $3.1 trillion changed hands on foreign-exchange markets. Every month $5.8 trillion changed hands on global stock markets. And all the time new financial life-forms were evolving. The total annual issuance of mortgage-backed securities, including fancy new “collateralized debt obligations” (C.D.O.’s), rose to more than $1 trillion. Read more

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:32 pm

We are already in the middle of a hope rally!When earnings for q4 starts to roll in things may get out of hand

AnonymousDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

We cannot trust the safety of food made by Chinese companies, so now we’ll need to be wary of pharmaceutical products made by Chinese-owned drug companies.

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Case of Case-Shiller on housing – Case on HousingFL, CA, NV and AZ – outside of those four things aren’t bad in housing — calls for stabilization e.g. bottom in 2009I also saw Shiller in an interview just now that echoed Case’s sentiments perhaps even more bullish stating home prices are no longer over valued

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 1:51 pm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Corporation.The Corporation.The film charts the development of the corporation as a legal entity from its origins as an institution chartered by governments to carry out specific public functions, to the rise of the vast modern institutions entitled to some of the legal rights of a person. One central theme of the documentary is an attempt to assess the “personality” of the corporate “person” by using diagnostic criteria from the DSM-IV; Robert Hare, a University of British Columbia Psychology Professor and FBI consultant, compares the profile of the modern, profit-driven corporation to that of a clinically-diagnosed psychopath. The film focuses mostly on corporations in North America, especially in the United States.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 2:07 pm

Dwarfing the Madoff Ponzi scheme, which in the end may turn out to be, at least in part, a scam to feign investment losses for purposes of ripping off insurance companies with invalid claims for fraud while bilking taxpayers out their hard-earned money with deceitful requests for government bailouts and tax breaks, is the Social Security Ponzi scheme. While the Madoff Ponzi scheme, so-called, may be measured in the tens of billions, the Social Security Ponzi scheme can be measured in the tens of trillions, making it a thousand times worse. The Social Security system is truly a Ponzi scheme in the classic sense, where the first contributors to the fund are paid benefits mainly out of the funds received from the contributions of later participants.The Social Security system we are familiar with was originally enacted in 1935 by an incredibly corrupt Congress (much like the current one), and signed into law by FDR, a corrupt and ardent Illuminist who did as he was told to do by his Illuminist Puppet Masters (principally John Rockefeller, Jr. and J P Morgan, Jr.). At that time, the Social Security system was known as the Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program. The OASDI was not implemented until 1937 due to Constitutional challenges, but suffice it to say, the Illuminist puppets in the Supreme Court of that day, who were every bit as corrupt as FDR and the Congress, made sure the Socialist agenda went forward.The Ponzi aspects of this Social Security scam were enhanced by one of the main conspirators in this scheme, the Federal Reserve. Shortly after the Social Security system was implemented in 1937, our central bank inflated our currency by increasing the supply of money and credit in order to boost prices and incomes and take us out of depression. This process accelerated in 1941 in order to fund the war effort as WWII got underway following the 911 event of that time, namely, the attack on Pearl Harbor, which our government knew was coming way before it happened, but then turned a blind eye to the upcoming attack so we could be dragged kicking and screaming into the next Illuminist war for profit. Incomes and prices rose as Americans went to work to power the war effort, thus causing incoming Social Security contributions to burgeon, while simultaneously debasing the value of the benefits being distributed, thus further enabling the Ponzi scheme to be perpetuated.Note how in 1933, just prior to the enactment of the OASDI in 1935, bankster-buddy FDR took us off the gold standard domestically, leaving only dollars and dollar-denominated accounts held by foreigners backed by gold. That meant we had a domestic fiat currency, which allowed the Fed to do as it pleased with the supply of money and credit in the US, and as you may have guessed, the Fed chose to increase the supply quite dramatically to fund WWII so the military-industrial complex could grow filthy rich. This tied in perfectly with the Social Security Ponzi scheme as we became an economic powerhouse in the aftermath of WWII, with a peak in the late 1960s, by filling the Social Security fund with fresh infusions of inflated cash to keep the Ponzi scheme going, while debasing the fixed benefits being paid out to retirees.Next came the Vietnam War, and more debt, especially to foreign nations, and more inflation from an increase in the supply of money and credit to fund the latest war for profit. This brought about the final debasement of our currency after the London Gold Pool failed to cap the price of gold, resulting in a bank holiday in Britain during the Johnson Administration. President Nixon, also an ardent Illuminist, at the request of his Puppet Masters, in order to stop the outflow of our national gold to foreigners due to war debt and to enhance the Fed’s ability to increase money and credit to fund Johnson’s Great Society welfare programs, took us completely off the gold standard in 1971. As a result, inflation went out of control as our currency became purely fiat in nature, with double-digit inflation peaking in the early 1980s. Once again, the resulting inflation furthered the Social Security Ponzi scheme, which was an integral part of Johnson’s Great Society program.In order to placate complaints about the effects of inflation on the purchasing power of benefits, which grew quite pronounced with the passage of time, an attempt was made to counteract the impact of inflation by providing for cost-of-living adjustments (COLA) based on official inflation rates. Not to be daunted, the elitists made sure that the Bureau of Lying (Labor) Statistics (BLS), which they totally control with their puppets at the BLS, put out greatly understated official inflation statistics, usually at one half to one third of actual inflation, a process known as hedonics, which they use to screw Social Security recipients out of their proper COLA increases. As you can see, Inflation is the best tool available to perpetuate the Social Security Ponzi scheme, by burgeoning incoming money at the full rate of inflation while benefits are increased by only a fraction of the actual rate of inflation. This has changed recently, because wages have stagnated, and this has put stupendous pressure on our already bankrupt Social Security system, a huge, gargantuan Ponzi scheme that is about to unravel.Make no mistake about it; this was an Illuminist scheme to impoverish the middle class, not to provide for people’s security. Ask Social Security recipients how many of them feel secure based on the miniscule benefits they are receiving. This was a Communistic spreading of wealth from the middle class to the poor, not from the wealthy to the poor, since FICA contributions have always been cut off at a level of income associated with the middle class, leaving the wealthy free of FICA liability on most of their income because Social Security benefits are capped, presumably making FICA deductions, above the designated maximum level of income, unfair. In the end, the poor are still poor, the middle class has now joined the ranks of the poor, and the wealthy are now fabulously wealthy, which results are characteristic of any Communistic or Fascistic form of governance. Between the Social Security system, the Income Tax system and the Federal Reserve System, they will spend, tax and inflate, respectively, the American sheople into oblivion.Their Communistic, Fascistic mantra has been: Give us your money and we will take care of you from the cradle to the grave. They will take care of you all right — in a Halliburton-built, slave-labor internment camp, complete with disinformation centers where they will brainwash your children to make them into good, quiet, dumb, cooperative sheople-serfs. This mantra has in fact been used to help fund all their plans for world government by extorting a myriad of taxes out of you, and one of the main taxes which has been used to fund their plans has been the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), which funds their Social Security Ponzi scheme, which, as a result, has actually become a Ponzi scheme within a Ponzi scheme.So how has our Social Security system become a Ponzi scheme within a Ponzi scheme? We’ll tell you how. Our reprobates and sociopaths in Congress have regularly, over many decades, overspent money to fund their pork projects and social welfare programs to win votes, and to grease the wheels of the Illuminist wars for profit which power the military-industrial complex. This has resulted in massive budgetary current account deficits.Adding to our woes are the trade deficits, which we have to fund by borrowing from foreign nations, thus increasing our national debt. These trade deficits have been caused by the gutting of our manufacturing sector through free trade, globalization, off-shoring, outsourcing, and both legal and illegal immigration. Illegal currency manipulations by exporting nations like China, Japan, Russia and EU nations have also contributed to the trade imbalance by giving these nations unfair trade advantages via debasement of their currencies, which makes their exports cheaper in our country, and which makes our exports more expensive in their countries. These nations also provide subsidies to their domestic industries, thus decreasing their cost of goods and increasing their bottom lines. All these currency manipulations and subsidies make a mockery out of the concept of free trade. We need fair trade, not free trade.And now we have trillions in bailout money being given to the so-called too-big-to-fail banks and transnational conglomerates to make sure that their executives keep getting their salaries, bonuses, dividends, stock options and golden parachutes while we get hyper-inflated into oblivion by throwing good money after bad.Now mind you, these are the same executives who, on orders from their Illuminist masters, have burned their once prosperous companies to the ground to screw non-insider shareholders and bondholders, to bust unions, to ship our good-paying jobs and our once huge manufacturing infrastructure overseas where they can take advantage of slave labor, to repudiate their obligations under pension plans, to cut off employee benefits, to hamstring our economy, to consolidate with and to eliminate their competition and to ultimately become nationalized by our government to form a fascist police state while we undergo hyper-stagflation, recession and then depression from the deleterious effects of all the bailout money being bandied about like booze at a wild party.What has happened to our once dynamic auto industry is a perfect example of this intentional waylaying of some of our major corporations in the manufacturing sector while the insolvency of our major investment banks, commercial banks and insurance companies are a perfect example of this procedure in the financial sector. The ultimate objective behind this intentional decimation of our leading companies and destruction of our economy is to bring us to our knees so we will accept a corporatist, fascist, feudal, Orwellian police state in lieu of our Constitutional republic.Due to all these deficits and psychotic overspending on moronic bailouts, in order to help plug the gaps, our morons and village idiots in Congress invade the Social Security reserves, handing back a worthless IOU that will never be repaid. So they are using current Social Security benefits to fund both current and past deficits in the general budget, thus creating a Ponzi scheme within a Ponzi scheme. They have promised you security in return for the tax contributions they have extorted from you to help fund your retirement and the retirements of others in the system, and have then turned around and spent your hard-earned money on their projects to implement world government, leaving the Social Security fund totally bankrupt. So not only are they robbing Peter to pay Paul, they are using the funds robbed from Peter to pay Judas as well.Now let’s examine why the Social Security Ponzi scheme is about to unravel. The first reason is the use of Social Security reserves to help fund the general budget, which by and large is used to fund the Illuminist scheme for world government. This money will never be repaid. Where could such gargantuan repayments possibly come from, the printing press? Well, if that’s the plan, get ready for a reenactment of the Weimar Republic, or if you prefer, put on your Mugabe costume and get ready to have a Zimbabwe experience you’ll never forget. This bankrupting of the system has been intentional. The old and poor are now at the mercy of the Illuminati, while the rest of us slave away to keep our heads above water and to keep the Social Security Ponzi system from collapsing and impoverishing our parents.The next reason is that the Social Security system is not just a pension system; it is an insurance and social welfare system, meaning that benefits are often payable to those who have contributed little or nothing to the system. This is a thinly disguised form of Communism. You are supposed to reap what you sow. They should have had segregated accounts, and let voluntary contributions to charitable organizations, churches and hospitals take care of the poor and the sick as was done in the past. Without taxes dragging us down, we could all take care of the poor quite well, thank you. Instead, we now have an ingrained welfare mentality in a large cross section of our population. Fraud and abuse is out of control.Another reason is the population control agenda, spearheaded by Planned Parenthood and people like Commie Comrade Obama. Thanks to their efforts, we now have a stagnant population that can no longer keep the Social Security Ponzi scheme going. Soon there will not be enough new participants to contribute sufficient funds to pay current entitlements of the soon-to-retire Baby-Boomers, much less to fund future entitlements as well.Also, as you might expect, Big Pharma and Big Medicine have gotten their digs in on the huge pot of extorted taxpayer money in the Social Security fund. Doctor, hospital and prescription drug programs are spiraling out of control as healthcare costs push into the ozone. The government is too loose with our money, unlike private insurers, who try to contain costs. Our government is too busy flooding Big Pharma and Big Medicine with tons of cash as payola for the big campaign contributions they make via their powerful lobbies. Many in our government have sat on the boards of Big Pharma companies. And of course, our allopathic system of medicine is not meant to heal people but to treat their symptoms, keeping them alive and very sick so they continue to make office visits and buy tons of drugs which often hurt more than they help, necessitating the need for ever more drugs to fight the side effects. People need to lose weight, get exercise and take supplements. That would solve at least half of all the outstanding medical problems in society today and reduce Social Security medical, hospital and prescription pay-outs by hundreds of billions each year. But of course we couldn’t have that. That would be too easy and make too much sense, and it would drain money away from these allopathic parasites.We already mentioned the fact that wages have stagnated, not even keeping up with official inflation, and that has put a crimp in the Ponzi scheme by preventing contributions from increasing at a rate faster than the rate at which benefit pay-outs are being increased by COLA adjustments. This is a huge problem.Last, but not least is the destruction of our economy. Unemployed people contribute little in the way of FICA taxes. And as more and more become unemployed, FICA contributions will diminish at frightening rates. You are about to see one out of every three Americans recently unemployed, unemployed long term and no longer looking for work, or only partly employed in part-time positions. And as businesses go under and their employees hit the unemployment lines, their matching contributions to FICA will diminish as well, giving the Social Security Ponzi fund a double whammy. Just imagine FICA tax contributions being cut by a third from where they are now. The government does not even have enough money to keep Social Security going for more than a few years as it is. What will happen when contributions are cut by a third? We shudder to think.Based on all the above, all we can say is don’t retire, and buy as much gold and silver as you can afford and lay your hands on after getting out of debt, buying freeze-dried food, purchasing a water filter and obtaining a weapon for self-defense. IS ANYONE AS OUTRAGED AS WE ARE ABOUT THIS SOCIAL SECURITY PONZI SCHEME?! Look at all the hubris about the Madoff scandal, and we have a Ponzi scheme greater by three orders of magnitude that is about to unravel while everyone goes ho-hum. It is nothing less than surreal.You have to love some of life’s coincidences. It certainly looks like Mr. Madoff had the perfect name, as he “made-off” with everyone’s money. You just can’t make this stuff up.http://theinternationalforecaster.com/International_Forecaster_Weekly/A_Ponzi_Scheme_Within_A_Ponzi_Schme

Anonymous ibid.December 30th, 2008 at 2:13 pm

Rich, Petraeus did not originate the concepts of counterinsurgency. They are very well known and were implemented first in Anbar province by a field commander, not Petraeus. For that matter, the field commander got lucky. Al-Qaeda-in-Iraq had made itself so odious to the Anbar locals that the native insurgents wanted to get rid of them. The Army paid them for laying down their weapons, and without local assistance, Al-Qaeda-in-Iraq lost any protection.For what it’s worth, I think Petraeus is a heckuva lot better than the previous management, but let’s be realistic. He’s no genius and he’s no paragon. He is, however, very good with the press.

aerial viewDecember 30th, 2008 at 2:30 pm

5 star post! Please re-post it periodically1! I wonder if a minimum 5% to maximum 10% (depending on inflation) guaranteed interest on SAVINGS would have eliminated or at least greatly reduced the unprecedented risk taking and excessive leveraging that has precipated this financial melt down? Could this also be a solution to creating a more sane, safer system?

economicminorDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

maybe at the wrong time for some but could be the right time for them..I know what you are thinking, they will be exiting as we bottom. That could be but for many it won’t be a choice.Then again, timing is everything. If we follow other major declines in the market, there should be a significant bounce before it goes down again, like tech in 2000 and the Dow in 1930 or the Nikkei in 1990. These are watershed events happening I think and life is going to be different no matter what.

JimmyTheBanekrDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:09 pm

You folks noticing a patternd here? The worse the economic data (“worst ever”, lowest ever”, “worst since record keping began”)the bigger the rally’s on the street. It is like telling your buddy laying in the sand after a shark took his leg off and severed his femoral artery, “It just looks bad, but it’s really not, just ignore it, you will be fine cause help is on the way…”Tow examples that launched today’s rally:”Consumer Confidence Hits All-Time Low”"US Home Prices Suffer Record Decline”

economicminorDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

Maybe a higher interest rate based on risk and compensation for having saved but also don’t tax it. Taxing saving is a huge negative incentive.The existing system forced people into IRA and pension accounts where other people with little oversight managed their money. It has always been a dilemma, once you have some money, it takes a lot of time to manage it for profit. Most people just wanted the good life, the gladiator sports and the vacations instead of taking time to manage their own affairs. The politicians were easily led by the financial industry and the populous was taken / led down the rosy road… all the while being fleeced. While the money was pyramided and given to the best stories and allowed to be used to consolidate industry after industry while little was really being given back to those who worked hard and trusted their capital to the cons.So in the end, we have Titans of Industry who demand millions of dollars in compensation each year and financiers who take their millions and those who put the money up and were taking all the risks with very little reward.The system is broken!And all the King’s horses and all the King’s men won’t be able to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, now that he has fallen off his pinnacle. Hope and trust have been smashed and all the funny money printed by the FED and the Treasury aren’t going to fix things. IMHO anyway. Time will tell. Don’t marry your position.

AnonymousDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

Although not a Ponzi scheme, this is yet another kind of scheme:Holocaust ‘greatest’ love story a hoax(CNN) — Oprah Winfrey once dubbed it the “greatest love story” she had ever heard: a boy held at a Nazi concentration camp during World War II and a girl on the outside who tossed him apples to keep him alive. They eventually married and grew old together.It turns out the story of Herman and Roma Rosenblat isn’t true.The two had told their love story for years and years, inspiring a book deal, an upcoming movie, and stories across the globe on television, in papers and on the Internet. A children’s book, “Angel Girl,” was also based on their love story.When the couple appeared on “The Oprah Winfrey Show” more than a decade ago, the famed host called it “the single greatest love story in 22 years of doing this show.”http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/30/holocaust.hoax.love.story/index.html

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:33 pm

NEW FED PROGRAMFed to start buying MBS up to $500b / $4 billion per day for six months.Guess who will manage this??WellingtonBlackrockPimcoGoldman Sachsfunded by additional bank reserves

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

4:36 p.m.[FNM] Fed MBS purchase program separate from Treasury program4:35 p.m.[FNM] Fed to buy MBS by creating additional bank reserves4:34 p.m.[FNM] Fed to buy MBS from Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae4:33 p.m.[FNM] Fed to start buying mortgage-backed securities in January

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:38 pm

and a HUGE new fed program was announced after the bell – interesting that Pimco if my memory serves me correctly had moved heavily into MBS in the past two weeks… and now they also get to manage this program – funded with additional reserves

MADecember 30th, 2008 at 3:52 pm

Hello Anon Ibid,I hear ya… Remember, I have never met the man, so I’m going off of a valued opinion.At the same time, as far as economists go, Nouriel was not the only voice. He did not create the bear mentality or naysaying.In the grand concept of “ranking” and individual, I find that if Petraeus’s actions saved 1 life (US or Iraqi) then he warrants the kudos. I believe it’s likely that even if Petraeus did not create this methodoligy… his influence and implementation have likely saved MANY lives… thus, I still say: Landslide.MA

MADecember 30th, 2008 at 3:56 pm

Eco-minor,I am in the RGE global Macroeconomics blog group. Scroll down the right hand side of the page until you reach “Rich Hartmann – Miss America”Many of your views mirror things I’ve stated for quite some time. (both in my articles, and for the past few years on Nouriel’s blog)Take care, Miss America

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 3:58 pm

and the yield on the ten year will soon take a one handle -http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/debt-management/interest-rate/yield.shtmlTBT / PST seemed too easy -

aerial viewDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

To maintain the elitist status quo, the FED will do anything and everything including providing a nearly infinite supply of our moneyand future earnings. Congress can spend months debating a $50 million earmark for some program, yet the FED can approve $500 BILLION for an MBS purchase program in a matter of days with little or no Congressional approval: wow, what a true democracy we have here!

Pecos BankerDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:06 pm

Everyone should be worried about their 401K’s, given that the dollar could fall dramatically this year, perhaps to 60 or lower on the USD index. I, for one, believe the first order of business is to get out of US dollar and into a more secure currency or into precious metals. This can be done with currency ETFs and or PM ETFs which are permissable 401K investments as I understand. Just my humble opinion, not investment advice. Indeed, I should mention that I read someone the other day who thinks the dollar will go to 92 in 2009. So do your own due diligence.By the way, what a scam the 401K turned out to be as a replacement for the defined benefit pension! Naturally it was promoted by Republicans.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:07 pm

If you combine this thinking with Elliot wave theory – which suggests that we are in the correction wave of a bull market which start at the end of the depression and which could correct the full growth of the stock market since 1982 – adjusted for inflation – we should see the dow at around 3000. Hence – gold = 3000 USD.I wonder what that means in Euros?…..

Eleftherios PerdikakisDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

It’s more likely that my grandmother will fly rather than Gold reaching 5kGold is dead and Dow will be at 30k in 2015But first it has to be renamed to Down Jones

David in SeattleDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:13 pm

Very interesting read regarding how the Fed programs will ultimately kill America’s competitiveness in the world. By bailing out failed businesses such as the automakers, the Fed will essentially kill American innovation and ingenuity.Entrepreneurs will be unable to compete not with failed businesses that should go out of business and make room for the new, but with the Fed, that will do anything to prop them up.Here is the full link:http://www.minyanville.com/articles/index.php?a=20476

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:14 pm

jb,i see the pattern, it’s the rational part that escapes recognition.? the market has de-coupled from the consumer / real economy? is that it? then, to what has it become coupled?

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:14 pm

jb,i see the pattern, it’s the rational part that escapes recognition.? the market has de-coupled from the consumer / real economy? is that it? then, to what has it become coupled?

ECONOMISTA NON GRATADecember 30th, 2008 at 4:22 pm

Could be, just could be that a new bubble is forming, the “Mother of All Bubbles”. Treasuries…..Best regards,Econolicious

HubbsDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:41 pm

Given that many economists expect an 1-2 year period of deflation, how quickly could a transition to all out inflation or even hyperinflation occur? Hours,days,weeks?Would such a scenario be preceded (triggered) by a frenzy of buying up of hard assets by banks while their dollars still hold value? Once all the money has been emptied out of the banks’ reserves to make these purchases, wouldn’t the world suddenly be flooded with money?What about the bond markets? How much/how fast could 100s of billions or even trillions of dollars dissolve?Any historic precedents that might suggest a time table?

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 4:48 pm

It is with much disgust that we have bailed out the hedge fund who owns 51pc of GMAC. The same folks who refused to share Chrysler’s financials. We don’t know if the UST investment of preferred shares in this bankrupt entity will go to the Cerberus side of the ledger and failed mortgages.In fact, we don’t know a damned thing other than 6 billion more will go down the drain. We should have invested only in new quality underwritten auto loans to help out at most.This will end in disaster.No one is accountable for these multiple colossal failures. Be it folks managing money who missed, uh-hum, a near depression or the managers stupid enough to buy GMAC or keep 49pc of it in the first place.We are on our way (and most of the Western World) to becoming Argentine.Good grief, Charlie Brown.

JLCDecember 30th, 2008 at 5:04 pm

Part of me is tempted to withdraw from the economy all together and go underground. Pull my cash out of the banks and find a way to make a living on the black market. But how? Any ideas on a good underground economy to tap into are greatly appreciated. I’ve played it straight and narrow all of my life. It is obvious now that the spoils go to those who game the system.I no longer wish to support the biggest Ponzi scheme in history. Screw this economy and the bastards pulling the levers. Its all a scam, and it has been for a long time.

HayesDecember 30th, 2008 at 5:24 pm

Cerberus have actually been bailed out twice nowbut I think Pimco still holds the lead – I’ve lost count – and best of all Allianz Group who owns Pimco is a European (German) company.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 5:50 pm

The Dow may be at 30k in 2015, but the cost of a loaf of bread may be $2000. Hyperinflation will result when the “experts” at the Treasury and Fed try to mop up the extra greenbacks.If I had to choose between the Fed getting this right or a seasick crocodile … I’d choose the seasick crocodile.

AnonymousDecember 30th, 2008 at 6:33 pm

Mr. Pete,While I agree with most of your synthesizing IMO your timeline is much too elongated. The fact is is that the acceleration of the inevitable breakdown of ALL major global power economies will happen quicker than most anticipate. The premise of a major global power war is now GUARANTEED. It is not a matter of if it is now a matter of imminent when. The military-industrial complex will endeavor to employ hundreds of thousands as it did during WWII. It will NOT allow Obama to divert remaining the majority of ‘discretionary’ (sic) funds to infrastructure.We are about to undertake entering into the TRUE start of WWIII my friends. It will no doubt involve the cooperation of China, Russia, and Iran, against the U.S., Britain, and of course, Israel. China and Russia as we write all this have ALREADY plans in place to assert their domination over petro resources in the Middle East through their pawn which is Iran. Iran will instigate the first move on the board. We will then follow along with Israel with the second move. The third move will be an amassing of ground forces from both sides. The nuclear option will not come into effect until ground forces have been decimated sufficiently on both sides that it leaves it as the ONLY remaining option to ensure continued survival.It is inevitable. Plan accordingly. And if you’re under the age of 62 and male you will be called upon to serve your country in some form or capacity as was done during WWII as well as it was with females. There is really no escaping this momentum now. History does repeat itself and we all honestly knew it was coming sooner rather than later.The party is over.DM

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 6:55 pm

It is coupled to The Federal Government, This is where the edges start too frail and people notice that something is not right. Smoke and mirrors, shinny fishing lure, if you decide to bite you may find yourself flopping around on the bank gasping for air.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 7:03 pm

That good old two party system, to say you voted for either is not saying much. Hand in hand they fool us all one in the same forever.

PeteCADecember 30th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

Legitimate approaches: People always need food, water and electricity (or heating oil). Very likely there will be little investment money in the USA in the future to fund improvements in these basic services. So whoever controls them, or their distribution, will occupy a key place in the local economy. You could, for example, buy into a water company in some local area where water is relatively scarce. You could also set up some sort of local food co-op in an area that’s not well-shopped. People are getting poor, and good quality food at low prices will be a really essential business. OR you could start some sort of education service. Young Americans are not going to be able to afford to go to college in great numbers. So they will need training for various occupations and businesses (e.g. mechanics, plumbers, electricians). Some sort of cheaper vocational training will also be in great demand.Less legitimate: Well, many US states will be forced to cut services and hike taxes. Very likely, state taxes on gasoline, alcohol, tobacco, and luxury items will probably see sizable increases. In the past this has created a thriving black market for people who transport these items across state lines. I’m not telling you to violate any laws. But it probably will happen.

Young EconomistDecember 30th, 2008 at 7:26 pm

I do not think too much quantitative easing and too much fiscal deficit are the good policy because it will cause the unsustainability of economy. What will happen if FED stop using monetary easing and government stop using deficit? Like Japan, they use a lot of easing tool, now they have government debt of 200 % of GDP and it is going to be 400 % of GDP in the next ten years, how can this be sustained?Economic boom and bust occur in the normal situation, but if we expect to let boom going on without bound, it will create bubble and the biggest burst.I think American should take money out of US economy now because the FED and government cannot show the sustainable long term growth for the unreliable policies, like Japanese people have done.

Wolf in the WildsDecember 30th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

Pete,If we are really heading down the the path of unbrindled monetary expansion, it will only be a matter of time when hyperinflation rears its ever so ugly head. In no point of history (with the exception of Japan with its massive savings) has monetary expansion not lead to hyperinflation. In the case of an overlevered economy like the US, it will actually happen a lot quicker, especially if the US$ decides to take a 30-40% depreciation. We will see that investment in ANYTHING will be pointless in terms of USD because there is no way to predict what the return of the investment can be. Zimbabwe and Weimar Germany are cases in point. The situation is worsened by the status of the USD as the reserve currency and the trade settlement currency. There will be a move from USD pegged currencies away from the USD as inflation in America surges. And to add fuel to the proverbial fire, countries WILL stop accepting USD for settlement of trade. There is no point accepting a currency that cannot hold its value. We are about to see a major and painful shift in paradigm and modus operandi in the world economy. I only hope it will not lead to military conflict (hope but in reality, it probably will).I hate being so negative but I see no way out of this problem. We are heading towards a seismic shift of epic proportions and I hope the rest of the world is ready for it.

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

g,..so the question remains, why would investors buy into equities whose prices are being maintained by the government? market forces become irrelevant and the quality of your investment is nothing more than a dream? maybe just a fraud?

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 7:45 pm

g,so the fed/banks are using the market as a stop gap utility to reflate the banks.that is the attempt, in part. to cover bad bets on mbs, derivatives, etc..

Average JaneDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:02 pm

Is the writer aware that 70% of the current “elderly” population subsist on social security payments ALONE? Who, might I ask, is going to hire an 82-year-old man? What are our elderly people SUPPOSED to do??How about the women who did what they were told, stayed home and raised families and never paid into SS? The husband was supposed to take care of all the financial stuff, right?–Don’t worry your pretty little head about it, dear, right? This is the way it’s supposed to be–you keep house, I make the money. Whoops, he’s dead at age 60 from a heart attack and gosh darn it, turns out he didn’t really know what he was doing financially. So then who’s going to hire a 65-year-old woman with a bum hip? Get real.When I can get answers to these questions, then I’ll get on the “Social Security is a scam” bandwagon. Not today.

Octavio RichettaDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:21 pm

IMO, this news (also posted above), which actually came out after the closing bell, is what made the market go up today, not the GMAC bailout.Who are the people who get access to this privileged information and how do they get it?I was so naive at 19, when I first came to the US 30 years ago to attend college that I actually believed there was a lot less corruption here than everywhere else in the world:-)By Craig Torres and Jody ShennDec. 30 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve chose BlackRock Inc., Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Pacific Investment Management Co. and Wellington Management Co. to manage a $500 billion purchase of mortgage-backed securities it plans to complete by June.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a160y41WSJvk&refer=home

Octavio RichettaDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

I nibbled a bit into bonds today: 5% each into TIAACREF bond and TIPs accounts. Also, I bought SPY 88 Feb’09 calls and puts (0.3% each) seeking to profit from a significant move from current levels, either up or down, by February 21. Actually, I believe the most likely outcome is that we don’t see a big move in which case I will gladly loose the option premia.

Lord SidcupDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:52 pm

“The United States effectively has a one-party system, the business party, with two factions, Republicans and Democrats. . . there are some differences between them. . . “.–N**M CH*MSKY”Politics is the shadow cast on society by big business and will remain so as long as power resides in “business for private profit through private control of banking, land, industry, reinforced by command of the press, press agents and other means of publicity and propaganda”– JOHN DEWEY

P&LDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:54 pm

Yes, blindman, this is a GREAT documentary that should be shown with the same frequency as “The Godfather”!

KJ FoehrDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:57 pm

Yes, I thought the same thing, and I’d love to know how they get the info too. The last hour ramp was very suspect.It’s still an inside game to a significant extent: those privileged few, whomever they are, get the good stuff ahead of the MSM and the rest of us. But, in this case, it merely improves the shorting opportunity that is developing. I will short heavily on the passage of O’s stimulus package, if not before.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 8:57 pm

If the FED continues to act alone in throwing billions of our money into corporations or programs without congressional approval, I’m renaming it the Fanatical Elitist Dictatorship!

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:02 pm

This whole issue will probably be “solved” by means of financial / economical regulation on the UN level. But that cannot happen until U.S. is so ‘down and out’ that most of the public there will welcome that solution.

MichelleDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:20 pm

Several generations ago it was common for people to have large families for more than just lack of birth control. Children meant old age security, and children were taught to take care of their parents and were honored in doing so. Blame society, blame ourselves, but we all need to look in a mirror and ask how we, as individuals and parents, contributed to this attitude shift.

MichelleDecember 30th, 2008 at 9:30 pm

IT’S JUST MONEY! Buy food, buy a farm! Big deal! It’s just freaking fiat paper! WHO CARES! If I lose it all, I won’t be one of the shallow folks sitting at my desk keeled over after taking sleeping pills and slitting my wrists with a box cutter! Bigger question is: Will you???

你老尾個臭西俾狗屌到射精生咗你條on9仆街仔December 30th, 2008 at 9:33 pm

你班儍西,日日夜夜講股災,美國都唔知幾能好!任印銀纸,屌西唔駛錢,食飯有人找數.

farnorth5December 30th, 2008 at 10:05 pm

Well Folks: What is it going to be??WORLD WAR #3 or BRETTON WOODS #3 Anyone care to bet ????WILL SANETY ACTUALLY WIN OUT !!!!!

Anonymous ibid.December 30th, 2008 at 10:33 pm

Far be it from me to try to discourage anyone from finding hope in this dark age, Miss America. If Petraeus is your hero, so be it.And it’s true that Nouriel was far from the only cautionary voice. I think, however, that he was the only one who saw the full sweep of the crisis, that although it had originated as a housing bubble, it would hit areas that no one suspected were linked. Even though I believed him on the main thrust of his predictions, I thought he was too early on the call on the date of the recession (he wasn’t) and too sweeping in predicting linkages in the countries that have large reserves and therefore could fall back on internal demand (while this could have played out differently, in practice, he was right).So, a serving of heroes all around. Except in Washington and Sacramento, where they need dunce caps and slaps.

MichaelDecember 30th, 2008 at 10:39 pm

Miss America, please look outside the military for advice about Military personnel. I have also known many military men but most if not all are blinded by their affiliation.The US military has failed miserably in Iraq. The surge only succeeded because the Shia defeated the Sunni in Iraq’s civil war. If you want to use the Anbar example then that only succeeded because Al Qaida operatives overplayed their hand. The Sunni Iraqis wanted them out of town and used the America’s as a means to this end. The US will leave Iraq in disgrace.You may choose to keep your blinders.

jomosDecember 30th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Wait! it has already been coined FOMzi today. In honor of the Fed Open Market Committee.Please, help me get in wikipedia and take this viral.

Dan HerkesDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:04 pm

Noticeable vacancies in shopping malls in N. Illinois. The resale shops are crowded and prices are higher at Goodwill & the Salvation Army. No lines at the upscale grocery stores, but the Aldi’s stores are quite a lot busier. This , I’d say, means that people are adjusting to diminished expectations. I suspect the longer folks are living down the better they’ll like it. Cheap is the way to go at all times, especially when the economy is roaring along. You’ll save more money.

MichaelDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:12 pm

In the advanced economies, recession had brought back earlier in 2008 fears of 1970′s-style stagflation (a combination of economic stagnation and inflation). But, with aggregate demand falling below growing aggregate supply, slack goods markets will lead to lower inflation as firms’ pricing power is restrained. Likewise, rising unemployment will control labor costs and wage growth. These factors, combined with sharply falling commodity prices, will cause inflation in advanced economies to ease toward the 1% level, raising concerns about deflation, not stagflation.”The long-term consequences of the resulting surge in fiscal deficits are serious. If the deficits are monetized by central banks, inflation will follow the short-term deflationary pressures; if they are financed by debt, the long-term solvency of some governments may be at stake unless medium-term fiscal discipline is restored.”(Nouriel Roubini – Dec 16 Commentary)hmm, I have said this before and I’ll say it again. The US is moving towards hyperstagflation.Roubini has correctly called a deflationary period. However he under estimates the inflationary pressures on the horizon. The Fed has wiped away TRILLIONS of dollars of debt by swapping its “printed money/capital” for toxic securities. Technically the new printed money has not increased the money supply but it has shown severe weakness in the US economic model. A weakness that can lead to a run on the dollar.Secondly, Roubini accepts the monetarist definition of inflation. At least I believe this is true. In my world view an increase in the money supply is inflationary. A dramatic increase in the money supply will greatly increases inflationary pressures. The Fed’s original Bankster Bailout did not increase the money supply however they’ve discussed printing money. I believe its quantitative easing of the money supply. Man I hate academicsSorry, I’m exhausted. Its past midnight here.I’ll reply here with some coherent thoughts tomorrow.

NYCDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:14 pm

the last made in USAENOUGH is ENOUGHafter laying off about 40 of my employees in 3 years time when is our country going to realize the biggest mistake they ever made when they started sending all the manufacturing to overseas ^BIG MISTAKE^I am so dissapointedjewelery manufacturer in NYC

JLCDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:16 pm

Thanks PeteCA. Bootlegging and moonshining were two items that came to mind. WA has very high sin taxes. Liquor is 2x more expensive here than in CA.Starting a market garden is another idea under consideration.Education is an interesting angle. Home schooling is popular in my area, but there aren’t enough good resouces to foster socialization and extracurriculuar activities in the surrounding rural areas. I am currently looking into that.My goal is still to get back on a rural acreage and become mostly self sufficient in food and energy. From there I can focus on several small scale income producing activities to make ends meet. Prices for a house and barn on 5-10 acres are falling quite nicely around here. I might start looking seriously in 2009.

blindmanDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:18 pm

sometimes i get the most interestinge mail. messy new world disorder..?shizzly:look into the cauldron:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bKwH3kJew4if you so desire.pizzle-T.ps. please to meet you, won’t you guess my name?but what’s puzzling you is the nature of my game.pps. never mind, music by flipper..notice the cut at time 1:54. “…everybody else” (to learn their limits.).the grand folly beat of the armchair emperors. as children theylearned to enjoy playing with other peoples lives.message. mess people up enough and then you can get them to reachyour conclusions.? and then they wonder why it isn’t sustainable. is that whatthey teach at yale?

redlegDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:19 pm

Petraeus took on a paradigm and changed it.That is Leadership – something that has been sorely lacking at the top levels of US gov’t. He did it with a combination of actions, words, and reason. If someone can change a paradigm in the military, that person deserves a very, very public “at a boy”.Let’s hope that Obama has a number of Petraeus- like folks in his inner circle who can make the changes we all know the US needs, and maybe some changes that none of us know that the US needs but really do.

JLCDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:24 pm

Included under the heading “market garden”. The drawback is that I would probably be paranoid about getting caught.I submit that the world would be a happier place if herb was legal and available.

GuestDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:29 pm

yes, i also remember seeing a tv report on that captain who rallied support among sunni elders in Anbar .It was a last ditch effort that worked. I guess a little more respect than they were receiving from Al Qaeda was just the ticket. Thank god.

JLKDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:31 pm

Excellent as always, thank you.The only thing I can’t get my head around right now is how is the US going to create inflation in a zero interest rate environment and deflation?Japan certainly couldn’t in the 1990′s.The only difference I am tossing in my head right now is the fact Japan’s debt is basically internal, whereas the US’s debt is external.

redlegDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:34 pm

India – PakistanThe whole mideast – it might as well be a free-for-all.China – Taiwan?Look at 1870′s and WW1 for analogs.

redlegDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:39 pm

Just remember that the Military Industrial Complex needs modern water, sewer, transportation, and power infrastructure to function.If you lack any of these, you can’t:have a labor forcebuild war materielget the war materiel to the staging points and then to the battlefieldguarantee enough resilience to survive a campaign of attritionInfrastructure is the key to waging a modern war.On the other hand, if the goal is to fight in a series of scattered insurgencies, then infrastructure is counterproductive…

Mother of GodDecember 30th, 2008 at 11:50 pm

sorry for this interruption, but I am seeking painter. p, i’ve tried to send you email at the addy i think (but am not sure) is yours – did you get it? we need to connect soon if you still want to, ’cause i have to be leaving here to meet a new, promising, but time-consuming responsibility to the no-downside plan to rid this species of the suicidal idea to allow the murderous, unjust overpayunderpay dystem.very much hope to hear from you before i go, p. you want to be part of this, i want you onboard. lemme know if you read this? or got the mail??

economicminorDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:02 am

Nice to agree I guess. Wish we were discussing nicer things. I have read many of your posts. Like I said, this is some of my favorite reading. But I read news articles and papers 5 or 6 hours most every day. I even posted once over at your site last week. Ask you to comment about the income to GDP dilemma. I am not a consistent poster but have also posted for a few years. Maybe three years. I started posting under the name of Kokopelli but felt odd and economicminor is more me. I am not a major brain. More of an observer and learner.I am known among my friends as Mr. Gloom as I have been talking about and predicting what is currently going down for years. Socioeconomic fascinates me. My beliefs are more libertarian and Austrian than Keynesian if you hadn’t already figured that out.Lots of others are unhappy with the way things have gone too. Mish, Peter Schiff, Prechtner,Calculated Risk, Russ Winter, Kurt Denninger and many others too. Even John Mauldin, Tom O’Brien and Jim Puplava talk about different aspects of this melt down. Most are angry with the lack of transparency and the bail outs of those who put the US in this predicament. I am not angry as much as disappointed with my generation who fought to change things during the Vietnam War and then succumbed to either family life and or greed or got lost in sports or tech. They grew up to be what they hated. Funny in a way.The consequences of the road we have been on are sad and will be even sadder for so many people. I wish someone could convince me that we didn’t have to write down all this debt but I can’t figure out how we can get out of this any other way. There is just to much to pay off. And writing down the debts, because they are sooooo big, will be painful for a long time. A few years ago, looking at this coming, Richard Russell said that the winners in this cycle will be those who lose the least.I have no doubts that in the end the US will be better as I think there is nothing we can’t over come. It is just that it is all so senseless yet predictable.If I ever quote you or say something you have said, take it as a complement. It is just that I read and listen to so many different people every day and week and don’t have an exact memory about where ideas came from. Lots of people saying similar thoughts.I do feel some comfort in the fact there are many others who see the cause and effects relatively similar to me. For many years I felt I really had to keep to myself.Again, have a very enjoyable New Year’s eve and a successful and prosperous 2009.Best RegardsA very minor economics player but a big observer.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:04 am

yes saw him this morning on cnbc. he said the final risk was a price overshoot to the downside. as always, location is key- imo tracts in the hinterlands not so good for some years yet, closer in stabilizing after quite a haircut.

economicminorDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:25 am

hate to tell you but the reality is much tougher than the dream. Everything cost more in my rural area. Phone, Internet, food, gas, just about everything cost much more and wages are half what they are in metro areas or less. And you need many more things to survive, like well pumps and septic systems and garden fencing and …… shovels and picks and ….. post hole diggers, roto tiller, chain saw ….. lots of tools and many things you don’t even think about living in a city.I’ve been here 35 years and I still haven’t gotten the self-sufficiency down to a point where my wife and I don’t have to work off the place most of the time. Well my wife works more than I do these days. The engineer said the solar system I want will cost $27k and that won’t supply even 1/3 the power I use. But I will have water, Internet and some lights in worst case scenario.Dreams are nice but in most cases, reality is much different.Just the knowledge base for rural living is different.I’m not saying not to do it, but be aware and ready for a difficult first few years of change.

YveDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:28 am

I think this is a first! The first proposal on the RGE blog. I have pondered popping the question to Nouriel, but it might make things “weird” between us if he declines. You understand, if this comes to anything, you have to invite all of us. We can use our useless fiat for confetti. I have my hole puncher ready. I’ll keep my eye out for a suitable gift at the black market when it springs up. Ain’t financial meltdown romance grand? Sigh…

AnonymousDecember 31st, 2008 at 1:43 am

True. But there already is enough infrastructure in place to still adequately get the job done albeit perhaps not quite as efficiently as it could potentially be. I foresee new orders for fighter aircraft from the likes of Saudi Arabia and other oil-rich nations. Indeed America and Israel will be the preferred arms dealers to the rest of the world. Do not think for a second that the Mil-Complex can afford a diversion of capital towards building more roads and bridges by the masses when it can pay the same to the same masses for making bombs that can be readily sold or traded to others. It cannot be said the same for selling a U.S. bridge and road to India as it were.No, we will enter into a major concerted conflict now. It is assured. The New Deal was entered during predominantly peace-time, but we are not at peace at this moment with our involvements in Iraq, and now Afghanistan. Remember what the Soviets paid in attempting to conquer Afghanistan. It is not mere coincidence IMO that our new President-elect is already indicating that Afghanistan is next? Why? Because the Mil-Complex wants it so.DM

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 2:00 am

Calendar and clock say it’s the last day of the year now. 2009 is coming at us at the rate of 1 second per second. Passengers will please return your tray tables to the upright locked position, and fasten your seatbelts.Another Year – A Biography Of My Spiritanother year of rockets launchinganother year of bombs raininganother year of madnessanother year of landmine amputees, pre and post pubescentanother year of fantastically overpaid and underpaidanother year of struggle of all against allanother year of grab all you cananother million girls sold into sexual slaveryanother million blinded for lack of vitamin Aanother year of being trampled by everyone above and trampling all those belowanother year of stupidityanother year of human intelligence as useful as stupidityjudging by resultsanother year of pride in our achievementsanother year without fairpayanother year of torture, oppression, secret police, kidnappings, disappearingsanother year of confidence that things are pretty much as they must beanother year of confidence that things are pretty much as they should beanother year of genocides, assassinations, mercenaries, terrorists,and pardonsanother year of toxic spills, lethal products, death of millions from simple lack of a clean glass of water to drinkanother year without shame or sorrowanother year of waste of buildings, people, talents, possibilitiesanother year with pay ranging from a million times to one thousandth of fairpayanother year of war, crime, disturbance, crises, depressions, triads, and cabalsanother year of nonearners taking over 90% of earningsanother year of billions with trillions starving 50 million to deathanother year when every family in the world working average hard is creating US$200,000 of wealthanother year without taking out of the social pool of wealth as much as you put inanother year of glossy magazine gossip about the rich and famousanother year of action, horror, drama, sci-fi, thriller, war, comedy – children’s dvdsanother year of government by mafiasanother year of between a tenth and a thousandth of fairpay for 90% of familiesanother year of riots, protests, massacresanother year of giants of overpay and overpower trampling lives, peace, safety, justice and democracyanother year of pulling leavesanother year of hope fatigueanother year of the human chimpanzee not knowing the connection of justice and happinessanother year in which there exists US$1 million in income per starving personanother year of acting like everything is fineanother year of anxieties, money worries, job worries, corporate infighting, dangerous streetsanother year of stress, mental breakdown, troubles, abusesanother year of pyramids, schemes, and financial destructionanother year of ostrichismanother year of vendetta-endless-revenginganother year of not knowing that the golden rule is good senseanother year of hurting and being hurtanother year of tyrants driving their millions of slaves to waranother year of thinking the superoverpaid are greatanother year of not knowing that no one can contribute to the social pool of wealth more than twice the average of 50 hours a weekanother year of bullets and tanks and depleted uraniumanother year of everyone in agreement that taxing the income of 99% of the people 99% would lead to extreme disturbance and endless problemsanother year of everyone not knowing that 90% of people are taxed between 90% and 99.9%another year of silence on this super-glaring point from all our most honoured thinkersanother year of humans sharing 98.4% of the genes of chimpanzeesanother year of perfect commitment to ‘everything I get is mine’another year of super-scarcity when there is plenty for allanother year of stealing from workers by threat of unemploymentanother year of vast horrendous unnecessary suffering for overpaid and underpaidanother year in which all have a birthright to US$200,000 a year per family working average hard, to 10 acres of arable land per family, and to 1/nth of all the natural wealth of the world per person, where n is the human populationanother year in which overpay has robbed everyone – overpaid and underpaid – of peace, safety, wealth, and happinessanother year of wealth ceaselessly drifting from underpaid to overpaidanother year in which the 1% overpaid take over 90% of wealthanother year in which the 99% underpaid do not campaign for fairpay, peace and happinessanother year in which the 1% overpaid do not campaign for fairpay, peace and happinessanother year in which 90% of human talent and brains are wasted by gross underpayanother year in which population is uncontrollable because of underpay another year in which environmental degradation is uncontrollable because of overpoweranother year in which topsoil is being lost at the rate of 100% per 100 yearsanother year when the economy is deprived of the spending power of 90% of peopleanother year in which war and weaponry increaseanother year of revel in our achievements, our technology, our erect buildings, our advances in scienceanother year in which the weaponry can destroy all planet life 60 times overanother year in which humans are unalarmedanother year in which this mother of all messages will not spread like wildfireanother year when people will wish each other a happy new yearanother year when people will say that money is unimportantanother year when people will work for money every day and nightanother year in which people will have confused and inadequate ideas another year in which people will slight realismanother year in which people will not respond to realityanother year when people will treat themselves at Christmasanother year when people will shoot the messengeranother year when people will punish the teachers of happinessanother year in which people will think they are awake and at peaceanother year in which people will think they can have democracy without the people taking responsibilityanother year in which we will be as far as possible from liberty, equality and fraternityanother year in which people will be valued in proportion to their assetsanother year in which people will not know injustice is theftanother year in which people will not know theft is dangerousanother year in which people will not know that ‘everything I get is mine’, is theftanother year in which people will not know that unlimited power is unlimited sadismanother year in which people will not know that they are being taxed by inflationanother year in which people will not know that they are giving tens of $thousands to the overpaidanother year in which 99% will not know they would be richer with fairpayanother year in which 100% will not know they would be infinitely better off with fairpayanother year when people will not know that none of the inherited reasons for higher than average pay per hour – business risk, responsibility, brains, talent, skill, experience – are soundanother year in which people will not know that siding with higher pay for business risk, responsibility, brains, talent, skill, experience, will make 100% of them infinitely poorer in happinessanother year in which people will not know that every transaction causes a shift of wealth from earners to nonearnersanother year in which people, despite knowing that the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and that this is not because of the rich working harder and harder and the poor working less and less, do not know that this is unjust, and that this injustice has turned the human world into a whirlwind of sufferinganother year when people will not know that society needs, as the mother of all needs, counterbalances to the ceaseless drift of wealth to the overpaidanother year when people will not cotton onto the survival importance of limiting overpay and underpayanother year in which people will think that pay from a million times to 1000th the average must somehow be rightanother year in which people will not know that our greater intelligence has made us vastly more suffering than the other animalsanother year in which we will lack the intelligence to be masters of moneyanother year in which everyone will successfully resist the impression of this messageanother year in which the most overpaid will take out a million hours’ work for every one he puts into the social pool of wealth created by workanother year in which just 6000 being overpaid up to a million times the fairpay would take all the earnings off the 3 billion workers, and we are within 10% of thatanother year in which housewives and students will not be paidanother year in which housewives and students could and should be paidanother year in which genuine workers will have been elbowed out by the more aggressive and moneyhungry in all overpaid jobs, ruining the quality of work in those jobsanother year in which humans will wallow in maximal injustice and call it peace and happinessanother year in which no one will show me I am wrong and no one will say I am rightanother year of viagra commercialsanother yearanother yearanother yearanother year

kilgoresDecember 31st, 2008 at 2:22 am

Another year I have to love and spend with my wife, my three sons, my elderly parents. Another year to watch the sun rise and set each day, oblivious to human events. Another day to strive to make this world of ours a better place, to try to ease the suffering of others, to sow the fragile seeds of hope in a desert of despair. Another day to thank the Creator for the gift of life.SWK

Wild BillDecember 31st, 2008 at 5:10 am

Another year of beautiful tomato sauce. Another year of fetuccini, rigatoni and tagliatelli. Another year of braccioli and fennel filled porchetta. Another year of newborn foals. Another year of tree-laden fruit. Another year of newly created music. Another year of new revelations about ones self. Another year of perfect babies and loving parents. Another year of brilliant authors with fresh new ideas. Another year of spectacular sunsets and migrating warblers. Another year of watching young people growing intellectually and physically. Another year of rich dreams and hopes. Another year of holding a loved one close to you. Another year of letting go of things that keep your spirit pinioned to the ground. Another year of vanilla gelato topped with chocolate sauce infused with amaretto.

blindmanDecember 31st, 2008 at 7:14 am

mog,you’re right. so there. but that makes you wrong. then there is that.just kidding, you’re right. but then again …happy new year anyway.ps. you’re right.pss. remember, 2008 is a leap second year. we have to add another second out of nothing.just add a second! like the money. another second of life! who could put a price tagon that? aaahhhh… the fed.psss. the second will me added just before midnight, tonight. it’s a freebee so we canall do whatever we want. wow. i can hardly wait. i have to remind myself to remainpatient.

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:32 am

yeah, those 50 million actual persons actually being continued to starve just don’t know and appreciate the meaning of life, eh?

kilgoresDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:34 am

What the heck. I always TOLD my father that one day there would be some value to my becoming a philosophy major! ;-) SWK

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:35 am

another year of very long, very negative real real reality, but of course you should continue to show more concern about the length of Mom’s post. now THAT is a horrible thing that deserves to get you upset.

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:41 am

I once wanted to be a philosopher, but the actual condition of the world caused me to become a hard-nosed realist, instead.It’s an uncrowded field of endeavor.

kilgoresDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:49 am

MOG, I don’t think you are as cynical as you sound. Surely you appreciate that one does not discount the suffering of others by being thankful for the positive aspects of one’s own circumstances. Wallowing in a recognition of the patent misery and injustice of the world, without more, does not bring about positive change for anyone. Appreciating what one has and cultivating compassion for others leads to tangible actions that can help alleviate, at least to some degree, human suffering. Nihilism is a paradigm of reality I have never been inclined to embrace.SWK

kilgoresDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:53 am

False premise, my friend. Being a philosopher is not inconsistent with being a “hard-nosed realist.” Being a philosopher helps to manage the down side of being a “hard-nosed realist.” ;-) SWK

HayesDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:56 am

Treasury Has Pledged More Rescue Funds Than AuthorizedBy MICHAEL R. CRITTENDENWASHINGTON — The Treasury Department has committed nearly $10 billion more than the $350 billion Congress has authorized to date for the financial-sector rescue package, which could constrain how the incoming Obama administration deploys the rest of the fund.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123068292824744097.html

HayesDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:59 am

(I am glad you asked because I was thinking 1pm and was not going to check — also S&P gets rebalanced today)December 31, 2008 – US equity markets will follow regular trading hours. US fixed income trading will close at 2:00 PM EST. January 1, 2009 – All markets are closed.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:02 am

MONEY is usually central to an intelligent discussion on an economic website, especially when it involves the reckless distribution of OUR, the hardworking public’s, money by OUR govt. Money is also rather important for food, shelter, transportation, communication services (i.e. the computer and the internet you are using to make your comments), healthcare, education; in short, everything! I would love to give my children your advice except for one thing: to buy food and to buy a farm, they’re going to need one thing: MONEY!

ptmDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:05 am

Why add a leap second?The earth’s rotation is slowing of course. It’s a long-term process. About 150 million years ago, based upon fossil evidence, a day was approximately 20 hours!Thus, if a day has lengthen four hours in 150 million years and assuming linear deceleration, that means in a billion years a day will equal one of our months! Agriculture will be very different in the distant future.Also long before the sun expands into a red giant, the earth will stop spinning.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordinated_Universal_Time#Futurehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:18 am

Gravity won’t be a problem, I am sure the blame will eventually be blamed on mankind; I would guess that jet travel is having an effect on Earth’s rotation and we should look at ways to correct this problem. Only joking?

redlegDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:22 am

Were you affected by the blackout a few years ago?Infrastructure wears out, with a design life of between 50 and 75 years. Electric, sewer and water projects were built in the 1930′s (WPA) and road infrastructure was built in the 1950′s and ’60′s (Interstate highways). All of these are wearing out at the same time, and maintenance has been deferred AND can only be done for so long.These systems need to be upgraded and replaced regardless of any economic and geopolitical situations just to maintain the status quo. To MODERNIZE? Remember, most of these systems, especially electric and transportation, were built a log time ago for much smaller demand.In order to mobilize the economy for war, adequate infrastructure needs to be in place. So just looking at your argument that there is war coming, infrastructure needs to be built to accommodate that in advance of it’s need.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:22 am

You far left socialist hippie! You guys always want something for free, the truth is very expensive and way out of your reach the sooner you realize this the better off you’ll be.

DanielgkDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:23 am

I want to thank this year for opening my eyes and find the little things that makes me happy…. This year I almost got bankrupted, I am currently in foreclosure and got married….. but this has been my happiest year ever!!

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:36 am

g,i take that as a joke. No? if not, perhaps you could tell me how much you charge for the “truth”. or how much you payed for that which you refer to as “truth”. also, how did you manage to achieve your exalted position of gate-keeper of “truth”. perhaps you work at the fed. the same fed that is endowed by it’s creator with life..liberty ..and leap seconds.but.. i think you were joking.happy new year.

nik og jayDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:36 am

“the truth is very expensive”please explain the pricing mechanism on this.Also who did you manage to strike the motherlode of truth?Is it so expensive you need to keep all of it for yourself?

olaDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:39 am

What if this world is a creation of your own mind and all others in it are only figments of it, only you have the power to change the outcome. The world is yours and what it is was allowed by you or was up to you to change, and this world is what is presented to the creator as your life’s work. All the good as well as all the evil was brought forth by your own thoughts or desires. Who is really to blame in the end?

kilgoresDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:50 am

Congratulations on getting married this year, Danielgk! Marriage can be challenging, but richly rewarding, too. Financial storms always pass eventually, and the sun returns, and life goes on. Best wishes for a Very Happy New Year to you and your spouse!SWK

kilgoresDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:53 am

WB:I hear you. On the other hand, it’s nice to be able to focus on something for at least five minutes without thinking about sex, as opposed to when I was 18 and couldn’t focus on anything for more than five SECONDS without thinking about sex! ;-) Of course, now, I guess, I think about food every five seconds, so I’m not sure what I’ve really gained…SWK

MADecember 31st, 2008 at 10:21 am

Hello Economicminor and all,Eco-m, I replied to you on my blog. You’ll have to forgive me for not getting back to you sooner as I’ve had a lot of sh!t on my plate lately.In general, I try to reply to all posters who visit my blog, but sometimes I miss a couple of posts. With a little more free time in the near future, I will hopefully be a little more on top of things.I wish you all a happy new year, and don’t forget to start doing your alt energy homework! (Conservation too.) Read and research! …and ask questions. It’s the inevitable curve to stay ahead of, and by increasing your knowledge you are making an investment in yourself that no market/fed/treasury/govt can devalue. Knowledge is king and energy is power. (…but don’t forget when reading, that many whom wrote have self interests in what they wrote. Alt energy information can be very incestuous, which is why you need to question what you read. Use your gut when analyzing, and rational theories (based on current conditions) when investing.All the best,Miss Americap.s. Outerbeltway, things are getting better. I’ll drop you a line.p.p.s. LB, if you’re surfing and pass by this post, maybe you’ll recognize my salutation? If imitation in the most sincere form of flattery, then you should be flattered! “all the best”

Happy Happy Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:21 am

just wrote to painter, and am sharing it here. Surprise!Hi ya, painter!Can’t write too much right now, but sure glad to get connected with you. Don’t be worried that by getting onboard the pay-justice train you’ll be commiting a lot of time to it. You can devote all the time you want to, but not much is required. The world can be saved if enough of us spend a few minutes a day, or maybe a couple hours a week or month, learning and passing along the principles of pay justice to family, friends, acquaintances. This is a word-of-mouth campaign for very good reason – a word of mouth campaign, because of the lack of any central organization, cannot be targeted, co-opted, subverted and undermined by “the powers that be”.And please know there is nothing to buy or sell ever, no leader to follow, nothing to join, no dues, no meetings to attend, no religion and no anti-religion in this plan. there is no cost but the time to read and learn and pass the thinking along if you agree with it. no force whatever, no coersion, no new isms and ologies to learn – we’re really just marrying the capitalism everyone knows to justice – because capitalism is a good workhorse for humanity, being worked very badly. Capitalism is too powerful a weapon to be left in the hands of the capitalists! My positions sound socialist to people, but I am not pushing socialism because i don’t see how socialism puts the wealth people produce back in the hands of the earners where it belongs. there is a difference between “soft socialism” and the hard variety, so it can be said my plan is in great accord with what “soft-socialists” do want, and i have no beef with socialists and communists except that their plans wind up creating big, inefficient bureaucracy via centrally-planned economies. The money people earn goes into the hands of The State, and the question is never “what” is The State, what *form* is The State, the question is always WHO is The State. We can do better. “My” plan really does have no downside for anybody – the trouble is that the ideas come hard up against the very most cherished mistakes in thinking this species has, ideas accepted without testing the ideas for soundness for a very long time.I’ve met a lady who published books for 40 years, and she was in my face 4 times to say “you HAVE to get the book done and published!” Once it’s finished, it will be a full explanation of the plan, and will be a handy guide for you. i do not expect you to start passing along the plan until i get you the book so you’ll have ALL the “arguments” you’ll need, all the information you’ll need. At that point, you can just refer to the book when people ask questions. The book will be your thinking, too, if you agree with the ideas, so you’ll be able to take it verbatim and call the words your own – you won’t have to struggle to write up the ideas in another way.painter, the tremendous eloquence in “my” writings belongs to my teacher – who is too brilliant for this world, if you ask me. MY only genius is RECOGNIZING genius when i see it. i’ll explain more about that part, this teacher of mine who taught me to see through the fog, as we go along. but mostly what i do is “translate” his writing so hopefully us commoners who are used to being fed writing aimed to a fifth-grade level can read his thoughts – which, yes, are my thinking, too.i’m hoping that you will help me in this way, for now: over the next few months, as i finish “editing” each chapter, you could read them and give me ruthless feedback on what’s right and wrong with them…you could tell me what bits are confusing or unclear and could be better.you up for that?gotta go now. lemme know you got this, ok?oh – and please know, p, that my poems like “Scuttle the Ark” and “Another Year” are truly just creative writing designed to, yes, slap the reader upside the head with a super-overdose of reality. The poems are love-poems to humanity, in disguise. waking people to reality is the most loving thing you can do for them, even if the truth pisses them off before it sets them free, har har. The forum thinks I am a miserable, depressed creature, which is hilarious to me. What they don’t know is that I am about the happiest person on earth, each and every day. Why is that? Because I’m on the right track and can be and am RATIONALLY certain of it (in 25 years of meeting every test of logic and reasoning, no one has been able to show where the thinking in the plan falls down), calmly doing every day the only thing that it makes any sense to do – learning and teaching the principles of pay-justice, murdering the idea to allow overpayunderpay so we can have the only revolution worth having, the lasting, peaceful revolution where ideas change in order to change society and culture – and knowing you have the map to get unlost is great, great joy in itself. Yes, I am joyful every day of my life. Knowing you are doing all you can and not wasting your time and energies going down a fruitless path is great joy in itself, and it gives you daily strength and defeats hope-fatigue other activists suffer.Welcome to greater joy, painter!Every best wish for you and yours goes here, for good health and happiness, peace and prosperity. Goodness bless your family.cheers for now,my real name is *****guess i wrote more than i thought i would, eh? tee hee!

MADecember 31st, 2008 at 10:26 am

MOG…Thank god for “another year”. I wasn’t done yet, and have more to do.Many more “another year” to you and the ones you care about.Miss America

Wild BillDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:29 am

Mother of God,There is not one line of your post I can find fault with or that does not concern me as well. If you will forgive a little testimonial, I will tell you why I am thankful for the positive things in my life in spite of the cruelty and misery that abound. I am now 66 years old. During most of my life, I have been involved in high risk activities that forced me to confront how bad things could be if it were not for some kind of intervention by events over which I had no control. In the military, I was in parachute training. I was peacefully descending when I landed on top of another trainees ‘chute. My ‘chute began to collapse. I rapidly ran off the underlying canopy, slid off and my ‘chute reinflated. As an elctric utility lineman, I found myself hanging from the cross arm of a pole, 45 feet in the air. My climbing hooks slipped out of the pole as I was unbelted and changing position. As a helicoptor pilot, I was flying over a salt marsh at 1500 feet. Dual controls were in place. The seat cushion of the adjoining seat fell off and lodged behind the adjoining control stick and I was in a dive with no ability to pull up. I kicked the cushion out of the helicoptor and regained control in the nick of time. My wife was pregnant and I was broke. The obstetrician wanted $640 up front. In desperation, I went to the local OTB, put 10 numbers into my hat in order to randomly pick three, to try to win the trifecta with my last 2 bucks. In the process, I dopped my hat and the numbers spilled to the floor. All but three were face down. I played those three and won. The payoff was $640. As a union official, I had many adverserial relationships with politically powerful individuals. There were times when discretion would have been the better part of valor but I opened my big mouth anyway. Each time I did, some intervening event or person pulled my chestnuts out of the fire just in time. I could go on with many more such anecdotes. The result of all this is I had my nose rubbed in all the bad things that might have been so often, that I can’t help but be grateful for what I have, and am always trying to find ways to be helpful and compassionate to those who seem to be brought before me. No one’s heart is big enough to generate all the compassion needed to address the issues you wrote of, but we can do much better by raising the level of awareness of all of us, as you have done so well in your post. Then we must take action where we can.I wish all the love you have shown be returned to you many fold. Happy New Year. Peace and Love. Wild Bill

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:45 am

Wild Bill, you make me want to wear dresses.(And that’s the highest compliment I can give a man. It’s a songline stolen from Lisa Germano’s “Happiness”)So many of you fellow posters mean so much more to me than you can know…

MADecember 31st, 2008 at 10:46 am

@ ORYou’re nibbling into bonds (TIAACREF/SPY88 etc) and believe The Gross-man will start making some money in 09.Is this gut?Or is there some techs behind it.I’m always curious on your moves (as you spell out many of your moves for us) If you have some time and don’t mind sharing, can you give me a little theory or what trends you see happening that points you in this direction?Much obliged.Miss America

CanadianDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:50 am

It’s worse than that actually – quite difficult to get a technical job past the age of 40. I’ve never gotten a good explanation as to why but it’s common knowledge. One of my co-workers heard an interviewer say ‘should we be hiring geriatrics?’ as he left an interview – he was 54 with 30 years of Computer Systems Analysis experience.Without question, Social Security/Old age security is necessary in a modern state. It’s somewhat better in Canada – the Canada Pension Plan really exists as actual money and is not just iou’s from the government for funds already spent.

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:54 am

Have you ever noticed how conservative the views on this board concerning spending of the FOMzi schemers to rescue us from our credit woes? Take a gander why we with common sense distrust the unholy trinity. “Why, then, do so many economists and commentators hold Keynesian views? Because those same mechanisms are also the core of the elite’s wealth and power, and since the elite control the major broadcast and print media and most universities, any economist or paid commentator who does not champion the Holy Trinity of government intervention, central banking, and fiat currency is shut out of the system. Gary North describes the process, especially in regards to academia, in a reality-based horror story titled How Academic Guilds Police Higher Education.”

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:55 am

thank you, MA. all sincerest respects and good wishes, right back at you and yours. i haven’t kept up with you and London Banker as I’d like to, but it’s strictly a matter of having too few hours in a day. am going to check out your latest right now, though – and will be stealing the genius parts to tuck into my widdle brain! (that’s my genius – knowing what thinking to steal and pass along.)you be well, and keep well, and never let the turkeys keep you down.

CaponeDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:56 am

@farnorth5 on 2008-12-30 22:05:28 and All,WWIII or BWIII that is THE question…Whether you “want to bet” or NOT, we all have skin in the game…Attempting to game this destruction in the economic world has led me to near bankruptcy (too greedy, reckless, etc.). On this New Year’s Eve, I can not change what has happened, but somehow believe this least desirable, somewhat mysterious (I WAS SHORT!!!) financial outcome is steering me to focus for a moment on the solution.Off the cuff, I know this solution involves planting seeds in the hearts and minds of the powerful to follow the universal laws of humanity taught by every major faith in the world today – shared universal ideas. Do unto others. Love your neighbor. Honor and praise God. If the handful of rulers in this world sought true wisdom and knowledge of the problems facing humanity today, an outcome far greater than that which lays before us would be possible. In 2009, love must defeat greed. Love must overcome the natural inclination for War. Whether this ends up in a deflationary spiral, a hyperinflationary depression, involves WWIII or BWIII, consider using the extra second to HOPE for the best.Safe and Happy New Year to All

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:03 am

Let’s hear it for yummy, nourishing food and loving sex! BIG YAY!(I just took an apple pie out of the oven, and i wish i could send it through cyberspace to all of you)

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:22 am

I have to object – yet again – and for the last time here – to the notion that war is our natural inclination. War is an AFFRONT to human nature, a perfect AFFRONT to our nature, as Howard Zinn points out in his terrific “Declarations of Independence – Cross Examining American Ideology”. Why would we have such aversion to war if war was our nature? Why would we even talk about ending it, if it was our nature?? I don’t mean to pick at your post, Capone, but I am convinced the wealthpower giants reap great, ongoing benefits from people believing human nature is to blame for the worst things the giants get by with. a terrible inertia is born from believing human nature is to blame for wars.just look at the people in this forum to see real human nature. You can hardly stop people from rushing to each other’s mutual aid, you can hardly stop people from rushing to fix problems as soon as they see them.Nope, warring is not caused by human nature, and war is so NOT inevitable for humans.war is caused by the murderous overpayunderpay dystem – though the wealthpowerful are happy that people don’t realize that yet.

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:32 am

In the spirit of the day, everyone has a story to tell and this is a partial one of mine.”Have you ever felt prophetic ? Myself being trained in biblical studies,sensed a blessing from birth with the hand of GOD invisibly leading me to greener pastures. The trip. October 2,1997 drops of varied water begin to cascade from the heavens. At first, a trickle but the cohesive forces of single drops combine in seemingly unexplained reality to form puddles. Than the puddles are urged by gravity to form streams. The streams, form rivers. Rivers, form bodies. The bodies evaporate back to the heavens, from whence they came. Beautiful by design and perfect in execution. So, varied individuals prompted from above. Gathered together and unified in purpose. We begin a trek flowing from around America. In. Maryland’s western rolling mountains, the first glimpses of streams are made aware of. As we approach The District the streams are rushing rivers descending to ground zero, Washington. In the morning, the convergence of purpose is manifested. As hundred’s of thousands of men unify for prayer. October 4, 1997, Standing in the Gap begins. A Jew from Denver says, “not since Moses has such been gathered.”"

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:41 am

A hispanic friend and I move on towards our destination, home in New York City. So we hitchhike a bus ride with hispanic worshipper’s singing native tongue melodious songs late into the night. We arrive in Trenton to their young energetic familias’ grinning with anticipation of good reports. Onward my friend and I must go. The AmTrac arrives in Newark at the 3 AM, followed by tubes to Journal Square and a 4:30 AM jaunt by Russian cabbies to a surprised homecoming event. Sunday’s first glimpse of the city as we emerge from the PATH/subway station to the jackhammer sounds of 42 nd street. A brisk walk from midtown past SOHO, Chinatown and Little Italy we arrive at the World Trade Center. A quick slice of pizza in a tucked in small shop across the street.Than the vision begins.

ptmDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:43 am

JOHN WILLIAMS’ SHADOW GOVERNMENT STATISTICS – FLASH UPDATE – December 31, 2008 – M3 Growth Is AcceleratingIn the most recent reporting of the Fed’s H.6 and H.8 on December 29th (for weeks ended December 15th and 17th respectively), annualized weekly growth in the seasonally adjusted annualized rate of growth for the last four weeks has held at 38.3%, a pace suggestive of the Federal Reserve’s massive systemic liquefaction of the last several months beginning to work its way into broad money reporting.For December, annual growth rates likely will exceed 17% for M1, exceed 9% for M2, and exceed 10% for M3. These numbers will not be published on the Alternate-Data tab at http://www.shadowstats.com until the monthly estimates are more solid.

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:44 am

A respite from all the ant activity was to be found between the twin towers. When you lay on the provided benches and look straight up the sleek linear sides, the Towers seem to lean towards each other needing touch. Closing your eyes, a sense of oppression emulating from the world activity is perceived in my spirit. We attempt to summit that day and are met with the most placid vista of the Hudson. Not a whince of wind blew and a quiet of peace on a beautiful clear autumn New Yorker prevailed. Down to the abyss towards the PATH, chimes of “The Exorcist” charmed bypassers as a viper clad person slid enchanting the amused.

ptmDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:57 am

A view from the trenches; from Reggie Middleton’s Blog – A few grim thoughts for the New Year, as I reflect upon the past year

Thus, any asset that was normally lent against, was most likely abusively lent against under this scenario. Real assets and mortgages were simply the first to pop, starting with subprime, and as we have already seen, definitely not ending there. As a matter of opinion, it is quite probable that the other asset classes that have bore witness to the lending abuses very well may be hit harder than real estate and mortgages – if not on an individual basis, then definitely on an aggregate basis. This is where Goldman, Morgan, HSBC, et. al. will see real pain. This is why Goldman’s level 3 assets are actually increasing as they delever. Think private equity, think, leveraged loans, think venture capital. Just think…Do you really think the government can prevent another big bank failure? It will happen sooner or later, but looking at the current condition and prospects, it appears to be more likely to happen than not.

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:06 pm

11And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her; for no man buyeth their merchandise any more:12The merchandise of gold, and silver, and precious stones, and of pearls, and fine linen, and purple, and silk, and scarlet, and all thyine wood, and all manner vessels of ivory, and all manner vessels of most precious wood, and of brass, and iron, and marble,13And cinnamon, and odours, and ointments, and frankincense, and wine, and oil, and fine flour, and wheat, and beasts, and sheep, and horses, and chariots, and slaves, and souls of men.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:06 pm

Disagree MOG: man’s nature is to NOT accept God’s principles and one of the worst effects of this is war; this is why Jesus came to us; to show us we are warring against him as well when we go to war! How could one say we are in line with Jesus’s principles when we kill another human being? If war isn’t man’s natural inclination, then why has man been at war continuously throughout history?

CaponeDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:07 pm

MOG, this was not a post that requires any defense. Note the reference to the “powerful.” The “powerful” as in those who control much of the illusion of reality we all see. Those who prefer to operate behind the curtain in the banking system and the war industry whose actions in 2008 were visible more than ever to the public eye due to the enormity of the situation. Those who own the failing system and via their natural inclinations to save it and maintain power and control will continue to starve the planet via inflationary actions. Those whose natural inclinations are to promote war as they the believe the business cycle serves their war industry company’s performance and entitles them to even more wealth.

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:09 pm

15The merchants of these things, which were made rich by her, shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing,16And saying, Alas, alas that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls!17For in one hour so great riches is come to nought. And every shipmaster, and all the company in ships, and sailors, and as many as trade by sea, stood afar off,18And cried when they saw the smoke of her burning, saying, What city is like unto this great city!19And they cast dust on their heads, and cried, weeping and wailing, saying, Alas, alas that great city, wherein were made rich all that had ships in the sea by reason of her costliness! for in one hour is she made desolate.

jomosDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:17 pm

“Will Banks and Financial Markets Recover in 2009?” Maybe, but what of 2010…11…12… The destruction of the lady is already complete. But, LOVE always protects…always trusts…always perseveres…LOVE never fails…And now, today! theses three remain faith… hope…and LOVE. But the greatest of these is LOVE. fini

ptmDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:22 pm

Just like NR, I, as well, am an optimist. For now, let’s forget world will stop spinning some day (no pun was intended), growing evidence of run-away Fed debt monetization, and the probable failure of Goldman or Morgan in 2009.Enjoy the rest of the day; have a pleasant evening; and as the garbageman said to me this morning: “We will chat next year.”

economicminorDecember 31st, 2008 at 12:46 pm

As More US Retailers Fail, Malls Could Be Next VictimThis talks about malls and box store and big retail but what about all the small strip malls and recently gold plated auto malls?We have retail space all over southern Oregon and from what I read, all over the country that was recently built to take advantage of all the growth in retail sales surrounding the expansion of the housing markets.This includes space to sell to all those HELOC buyers that no longer exist and Cash Take Out loans and spending from the inflated sales prices of homes. All that is ended and all those retail spaces from lighting fixture stores to furniture stores to bedding and accessory stores, plus the restaurants and everyone else that benefited from the boom are now with much smaller incomes sitting on huge rents or leases which rose as the properties they occupied were built at peak times or sold at peak times… Plus the increases in electrical power and phones and insurance and … that all went up during the *good* times.All of this is unsupportable going forward. First the rents stop coming in. Then the payments on the loans aren’t made. Then defaults, foreclosures and bankruptcies. This section of our economic down turn is only in the first inning. We have a long way to go with it and it will lessen the income of the store owners who will lay people off. Most of whom will no longer make their payments on their homes, autos and credit cards and the whole thing gets worse…. Commercial/business down turn resulting in lay offs resulting in a further weakening of housing prices resulting in more business contraction. All started with SubPrime. But has become a consumer led recession of the worst kind.This is what deflation is… This is what the FED and the government are so frightened about. Once it starts, it is very difficult to stop.The insane thing is that it was not necessary. It has a history. It should not have happened. And it is all about an unsupportable pyramid of debts that have no basis for economic viability. Debts built huge by consumption. Consumption of oil, consumption of wood, brick, granite counter tops and wars that were put on the credit card. Consumption by elderly and retirees who’s pension money was lent to support consumption and not industry.When will we learn?Looks like the lessons are here and we will be learning. Those who refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it…

economicminorDecember 31st, 2008 at 1:00 pm

The Ultimate Bubble? This is about another shoe that is going to fall. The Private Equity firms who uses leverage and the carry trade to build large empires.One of them bought Chrysler others are in commercial real estate and others in other companies, some even leveraged to buy equities.This discusses the probability of who’s going down first…The arrogance of the wealthiest may in fact be their down fall.Times are sure interesting.

MADecember 31st, 2008 at 1:19 pm

jomos…I miss the towers. Their departure changed my life forever. I spent every other lunch at those benches, (alternating with City hall park) 7 years later, I still can lose 10 minutes to daydreams and nightmares about them.I hope your faith gives you the comfort that I have searched for, but never been able to find. May 2009 treat us all well regardless of our beliefs.MA

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 1:22 pm

Capone, your post seems to be saying that our future hinges on converting the rich and powerful “leadership” in this world to true religion (meaning the word of God, not the word of the “churchmen”, to put it too simply).I do not think that is a realistic goal at all, so I think it is very fortunate for us that our future actually hinges upon humans gaining economic clarity, and simply coming to act in accord with what everyone already really believes. THIS, is utterly doable.Ever heard that phrase; Justice will be done? We have that on our side – humans crave justice. We’re going to give in to our craving sooner or later. If we’re still here.

HayesDecember 31st, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Treasury Drafts Broad Guidelines for More Aid to Auto Industry Dec. 31 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. Treasury drafted broad guidelines for aid to the auto industry that would let officials provide funds to any company they deem important to making or financing cars.The Treasury already has provided $6 billion in aid to GMAC LLC, the financing arm of General Motors Corp., and up to $17.4 billion in financing for GM and Chrysler LLC, using funds from the $700 billion bank-rescue package.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aR8huxXy_VWI&refer=home

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 1:55 pm

Pour me a sparkly glass, too, please. I want to toast your post from above, and your good perception, kilgores:”MOG, I don’t think you are as cynical as you sound. Surely you appreciate that one does not discount the suffering of others by being thankful for the positive aspects of one’s own circumstances. Wallowing in a recognition of the patent misery and injustice of the world, without more, does not bring about positive change for anyone. Appreciating what one has and cultivating compassion for others leads to tangible actions that can help alleviate, at least to some degree, human suffering. Nihilism is a paradigm of reality I have never been inclined to embrace.”Like I explained, my poem is a love poem, creative writing hellbent on shining a spotlight onthedark because it needs more press, more voice…because embracing all of reality is simply vital to our survival and happiness.But here’s some more of the important whole of reality. May we all keep remembering this: We are existence, existing, and knowing it exists. Love is existence existing. Each of us is awash in the highest pitch of Lovegift – this perfectly imperfectly perfect world. Each of us inherited the never-ending goldmine when we took our first breath, and may we recognize that we inherit it again, with every breath we take.”And I think to myself, what a wonderful world”(definitely worth the clean-up effort)

crgordonDecember 31st, 2008 at 2:24 pm

I would expect 50 million is a very low number.Having been extremely poor in my life with times where oatmeal was the only food I could provide for my family for days in row, I never considered that I didn’t understand the meaning of life. Now that I am financially comfortable, I have neither gained nor lost that understanding. When you equate starving with an inability to understand life I think you are short-changing those with hunger. From personal experience, being well-fed doesn’t improve the understanding of life.

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 2:26 pm

Well, em, I think we won’t learn the lesson history has been trying hard to bang into our chimpy heads until it finally dawns on us that market forces constantly and automatically shift the work in one direction and the wealth produced by the work in the other direction. I think when we learn that, we’ll see that we must put measures in place to counter this ceaseless drift that does all the damage.

Mother of GodDecember 31st, 2008 at 2:40 pm

…and will there be a far left socialist hippie party with champagne and fatties here later?just askin’. when you’re an oracle, CM, the questions never stop.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 3:13 pm

Debt and inflation are two separate animals. Debt is created out of thin air and is the promise of future earnings, while inflation is the real effect of monetary policy delayed by about 6-8 months (i.e., putting more money in the system to replace lost debt).

blindmanDecember 31st, 2008 at 3:13 pm

j,how do you interpret that? do you see it as related directly to 911,or something else? perhaps something that has not occurred yet?

economicminorDecember 31st, 2008 at 3:30 pm

I use to read Prudent Bear 5 or 6 years ago and still read a link here and there.There really are a lot of great writers and good researchers. Safehaven, Calculated Risk,so many…. Doug Nolan writes for the Prudent Bear. He is one hell of a researcher and writes a credit report I think every week. I have a hard time with all the details so mostly go to his summary. He has been way ahead of the curve on what was coming down.With so many who understand what is going down and none of them picked by our new President who ran on a ticket of *Change*, it is somewhat disheartening to say the least. I just see things getting worse and worse until those at the top have eliminated themselves thru their poor decision and lack of understanding or good judgment. To Pig Headed to be good leaders. I think it really gets down to that good old quality called Common Sense! Greed and arrogance fueled by their education and connections has led them and our country astray.Thanks for the reminder to check with them off and on for updates and info.

AnonymousDecember 31st, 2008 at 4:17 pm

I am tired of listening to the negative stuff. Can someone at RGE write something positive or at least provide some concrete solutions to how to prevent everything from going to hell in a hen basket.Negatism breeds negatism.

AnnSDecember 31st, 2008 at 4:19 pm

as we did in 1929. That crash caused the Great Depression.I was reading until I hit that. You may want to consider adding some classes in HISTORY – maybe the history of economics and the 1930s. So sorry but the stock market crash did NOT cause the Great Depression. The economy in the US had been sliding downwards since aorund 1926. Manufacturing was pulling back,spending was dropping and all before the Crash. Only a very small number lost money in the Crash. The Crash was a symptom, not “the Cause” of the GD. Thee underlying microeconomics in 1926-1930 were very much as they are today:(1) Flat or stagnant incomes(2) Huge income inequality with the gains going to the top 1%(3) Households burdened with too much debt having discovered that new-fangled idea of ‘buying on time’(4) Major sector of the economy was failing – then that sector was agriculture which had too much debt from expansion during WWI and too much production (food surplus) which drove done prices.

AnnSDecember 31st, 2008 at 4:29 pm

I recommend Grimms Fairy Tales for a start if you wish to live in a fantasy land.Facing reality (which happens to be negative at this time) is rational. Refusing to deal with the reality and pretending that everything is just wonderful becuase you are ‘thinking positively’ will get you locked up in a psych ward and given very strong medications on the grounds that you are delusional.Events are, and have been for some time, NEGATIVE and BAD NEWS. DO you want the authors to make up fairy tales for you so you can have ‘something positive”?Guess what? There may not BE a solution, let alone a concrete solution. the bad things may jsut continue to happen and no one can stop them. Want a solution? Think one up and stop expecting to be spoonfed and rescued.

AfADecember 31st, 2008 at 5:38 pm

I know that was childish, but I had nothing else to say except maybe there is enough Grey matter around to solve most problems. What is needed is the courage, will and commitment to use it. So I hope 2009 will bring some of that.Do you have anything in mind when you talk about “something positive” and “concrete solutions”?

crgordonDecember 31st, 2008 at 5:38 pm

Actually Grimms Fairy Tales are quite scary. Perhaps a Disney World, controlled-imagination environment is better suited for Anon. Much less scary.

Anonymous ibid.December 31st, 2008 at 5:50 pm

The give your “attaboy” to Colonel Sean MacFarland, redleg. He was the one who changed the situation in Anbar.I don’t mean to detract from Petraeus. He has been one of the few people in the military to care about counterinsurgency doctrine. He wrote his dissertation on it. But, there are… issues. You can read about some of them at http://www.counterpunch.org/price10302007.htmlLike I say, Petraeus is very good with the press.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 5:52 pm

The collapse has started to slow at least the panic part of it, there are no runs on the bank, we’re off the gold standard they can print and inflate all they need to. They’re protecting jobs and figuring out ways to get banks to lend etc. The bigger picture is that U.S. will be a poorer nation going forward to pay for its excesses. Not the end of the world we’ll be ok.

Octavio RichettaDecember 31st, 2008 at 5:55 pm

Happy new year to everyone! RGE readers in many parts of the world are already celebrating. Here in Argentina we have about 2 hours to go. It looks like even if we have deflation coming, we will have plenty of inflation scares along the way from which one can profit. My TBT and oil-related leap options did pretty well today.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 6:07 pm

Here’s a big positive the political climate is changing, it’s becoming more and more unacceptable for management to pay themselves 100 times the average worker.Another huge positive are forums like these were people can exchange and express their ideas and views freely, this takes the power out of the hands of the big business’s agenda and counters their control and manipulation of traditional media.Bankruptcies are up and this frees up businesses and peoples ability to apply their productive gains at a more grass roots level and that’s very beneficial to society. If everyone is straddled with debt and the fruits of their labor are disbursed to the people who control the money supply then this chokes off the middle class and the greater economy-you can’t have just a few with all the money. Bankruptcy is a form of government backed robin-hood.

OllerDecember 31st, 2008 at 6:29 pm

Just finished reading ” The Great Depression of Debt”by Warren Brussee. He analyzes the S&P 500 price/dividend ratio history and sees a regression to the mean at 17 to trigger investing back in the market. His idea is to seek refuge in TIPS while the S&P 500 is above 17, then get in after and get out at 28. I agree with him that price/earning ratio analysis is a joke, because of all the fraudulent accounting. His thesis is to stay out of equities until the price/dividend ratio is rational! He implies an S&P 500 at 500 at some point soon!

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 6:35 pm

Its funny how bond holders fancy themselves as the engine of growth. A piece of paper sits there it has no worth and does no work its relative meaning is way overvalued in our economy. It’s time we start valuing industry which automatically implies sacrifices to bond holders at least in the short run. The question is will the FEDE/government allow bondholders to impoverish our nation?

Miss ItalyDecember 31st, 2008 at 7:41 pm

Happy 2009 to everybody.Wish all the best to all and that Prof. Roubini will be able to forecast the economy so well as he did in the last two years!

economicminorDecember 31st, 2008 at 8:45 pm

No but the markets melted down in Oct ’29 and then after about a year there was a 50% retracement rally. Then plunged, which is where lots of people lots the most after going back in on the rally.I understand that the cause was debt as I have pointed out (questioned) the debt to income ratios of then and now in other posts.Sorry, it just take a lot of space to be perfectly clear and then I am not perfect either…Sorry for the confusion

HolyCowPuncherDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:06 pm

but if the money added to the system never reaches consumers, why would there be inflation? Through some magical action?In fact consumer prices have stayed rather low in the U.S. even though the Fed has been feeding money to the system like crazy since at least early 2008. And look at the gas prices – they have kept going down (in the US) for the last months. OK so it could be that they were high because of greed and not because of inflation in the first place. Or then it could be that “inflation” never is a real (actual / concrete / physical) effect anyway but is just the result of perception…After all what are the reasons for a retailer to increase their prices? It’s not like they look at the news and say “wow looks like Fed is pumping more money into the system – time to hike up my prices”. What matters for the retailers is how much money they see the grassroot public have. OK so there is the other issue of increases in raw material and shipping costs which will affect the manufacturers and thus can cause a price increase at the retailer. But if the manufacturers increase their prices and then can not sell their products, they go belly-up.So where’s the connection mechanism between Fed feeding money to the system and higher prices?

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:44 pm

I have faith that men who have known freedom will always, in the end, sacrifice everything to retain that freedom. Americans are close to that point where they will tap into that thirst for freedom that brings revolution if the few now wielding raw power do not respond to the call for change – real change, not Obama “change.”The thrust for free enterprise and freedom is building as the current rule by wealth is exposed by financial crisis, i.e., rule by a plutocracy led by a private banking cartel– an international combine that makes agreements in restraint of free markets by regulation control and credit favoritism and the fixing of self-serving interest rates and currency exchange and by debt and fraud and trillion dollar inflation swindles. Freedom seekers now can identify by name exactly who the few are who have taken the “free” out of free enterprise and the American Dream.As these swindlers barricade themselves against the economy, squandering all the people’s resources to retain their control of the markets and the world’s currencies and their corrupt monetary operations, the people are gearing up to force back.It is now a question of opportunity. As things get worse, and they are going to get much worse, and the government clamps down more and more with no redress, that desire for freedom is going to kick in, and men are going to drop everything to get that freedom back. And they are going to fight, and will kill if they have to kill as they always have, in the cause of human freedom.“Government exists off surpluses created by the people whom they rule. The ruling classes, i.e., those people who refer to themselves as ‘government,’ do not produce wealth, thus their existence depends upon the expropriation of assets from others,” writes Robert J. Ringer in “Restoring the American Dream.”“The American Dream was about individualism and the opportunity to achieve success without interference from others. The heart of the American Dream is freedom: the lifeblood is free enterprise.“The time has come. The citizens of this country either must draw the line and take America back from the politicians who now control it, or they must be prepared to relinquish forever their remaining claims on liberty.”We have drawn the line. We are not “going to hell in a hen basket.” Happy New Year.

redlegDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:49 pm

Petraeus handled the situation in Mosul as CO of the 101st as an insurgency from the get-go. Anbar came later.More than one attaboy can be given, and should, when deserved.There are a few more I can think of too, but their names escape me (LTC McMaster?).

JLCDecember 31st, 2008 at 9:51 pm

Many thanks to all here. 2008 sucked, but thanks to the wisdom shared in this forum I have avoided the worst of it.CHEERS!(More Glenfiddich please)

MandarinDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:27 pm

Anonymous, thanks for sobering me up. I’ll break the news to my Polish relatives. They didn’t die in the camps. It’s all hoax. Get back in your flying saucer and stop wasting my time.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:30 pm

If you do not think inflation is real, then why are you reading this blog? Who has such a poor memory that they cannot understand, see, or feel inflation? Are you working for the government? Because that’s the only explanation that makes sense.See http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data The top chart shows inflation and in simple terms there was 9% inflation for 2008 even with lower gas prices.The next chart shows the money supply which has also grown by about 10% for 2008. Watch these graphs for the next few months and you will see the connection.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Happy New Year, Nouriel Roubini. What a wild, adventurous economic ride it has been circling the globe with you in 2008. Your economic prowess with blog back talk from some of the best minds in the business has made RGE EconoMonitor the place to be in 2009 and onward. It is a privilege to be spending it with you and everyone here.A toast to One and All. “Life is like a rainbow. You need both the sun and the rain to make its colors appear.” I love you all: your seriousness and your humor. Happy New Year!

Average JaneDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:08 pm

Darned good question,isn’t it, pa? Most middle class folks are wage earners, right? We sell our labor for wages. Our wages pay for the food on our tables and the roof over our heads and the clothes on our backs. We don’t have the slightest idea how to live by manipulating money. We get our hourly wages for our hourly “labor,” pay our bills and taxes and have little left to spend other than on the essentials. When we’re older more of our wages are spent on potions and pills for our old bones, hearts, livers. And other than institutional knowledge from a lifetime of wage-earning work, we have little to bring to an employer who can only offer wages. Old bones have a harder time digging ditches. Old brain cells have a harder time learning new computer software.So employers, let us hear from you. I am not an employer; I’m a worker bee. Would you hire me to, say, work in your claims department if I’m, say, a 64-year-old grayhaired grandma? Or would you rather hire a blonde, leggy 19-year-old wage earner to process your claims? Whose labor is more worthy of your wages?I wait with bated breath. And as I’ve said before, Mother of God has expounded much more eloquently than I on this subject. She advocates a total paradigm shift vis-a-vis the meaning of work/labor and the “value” to be attached thereto. I’m not optimistic that’ll happen in my lifetime, but who knows. Pretty much everything that’s happening now in my middle class American workworld is “unprecedented,” uncharted waters, etc., etc., ad infinitum, ad nauseum. No one wants to think about the old people. And we are or will be those old people, and we’d better get our craniums out of our rectums pretty darned soon.

Average JaneDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:14 pm

More’s the pity. She’s a lucky gal, JLC ;) And no, this isn’t the first marriage proposal on this blog. Not too long ago our host NR received a pretty serious one. He is awfully cute, too, I must admit. Lots of refreshingly smart fellas here. Smart chicks, too.

GuestDecember 31st, 2008 at 11:37 pm

I left home at 17 in 1970 and have supported myself ever since.I vividly remember living on cornflakes and powdered milk for 28 days and nothing for the last 3 of a 31 day month, waiting for a paycheck to show.Never had a cornflake since:)Today, I believe I am financially “bombproof” but who knows?Along the way, I learned that there is a HUGE difference between “not enough” and “enough”, but there is very little difference between “enough” and “more than enough”.All the money I make above what I believe I will need to see me out, I give away. I paid off my parents mortgage, then my brother’s.I’m working on my friends who are in need next.(And while I take great joy in helping those I love lead more secure lives, lately I have also started taking great pleasure in depriving some bank of 20 years of interest!It is easier for some people to make money than others, but there is also the good/bad luck of birth place, timing, and opportunity.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 12:19 am

Stop doing business with any bank that’s not locally owned and operated.Learn how to do something genuinely useful this year, so that you have something of value to offer the tribe.Find somebody worse off than you are and help them (trust me, anonymously is best!)

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 1:34 am

Budget cutbacks in Law Enforcement=more emphasis on REAL crime, not victimless crime. Overcrowded prisons + budget shortfalls = defacto decriminalization for the prudent. Safer now than ever!

Little SaverJanuary 1st, 2009 at 3:07 am

Any thoughts on this forward looking statement on future inflation?From Martin Hutchinson December 29, 2008 (http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/commentary/bearslair?art_id=10170)The broad money supply, for which the St Louis Fed’s MZM series (which takes into account currency, checking, savings and money market accounts but not certificates of deposit) is the best available proxy, has risen at an annual rate of 16.6% in the last two months or 10.1% in the last year; removing that amount of money quickly is clearly likely to be difficult. More startling still, however, is the behavior of narrow money in the form of the monetary base, which had been increasing at 3-to-4% per annum in the period to September, but has gone completely haywire since then, increasing at an annual rate of 990.9% in the three months to December. No, that’s not a typo, in those three months the monetary base has been increasing at almost 1,000% per annum. Over the last year, its average rate of increase is 86% per annum, but that reflects nine months of gentle increase followed by explosion.A rapid 10% decrease in broad money is probably impossible without wrenching the economy into a deep recession; a halving in the monetary base is certainly impossible without collapsing the banking system. Hence, the excessive increases in money supply will not be withdrawn, though the pace of increase will presumably be moderated. The Fed will not reverse course when inflation appears, but will instead act feebly as it has in every inflationary manifestation since 1995. Inflation will thus get a good grip; based on the usual temporal relationship between money supply increases and inflation we should expect consumer prices to be increasing at an annual rate of more than 10% within 18 months of today.

Little SaverJanuary 1st, 2009 at 4:00 am

More projections for 2009 from Hutchinson that sound reasonable:The forecast for 2009’s stock market derives from the economic forecast. In the early months of the year, the market may well be quite strong, as the recession appears to bottom out and investors seek “bargains’ at levels that appear cheap compared to the bubble of 1996-2007. However, later in the year, as reality begins to dawn, the market will once again be weak. I have calculated previously that the stock market’s equilibrium level can be assessed as the Dow Jones Industrial Average 4,000 level reached in early 1995, inflated by nominal Gross Domestic Product. That would give a current figure of around Dow 7,900. However the bond market collapse will provide an extraordinary shock to the system and will send the stock market far below its equilibrium level, perhaps to as low as Dow 5,000 or even 4,000. At the end of 2009, the market will probably be lower than today, but still dropping.Thus 2009 is likely to be another Bear year, making the 2000s the equal of the 1930s in their destruction of investor value.

AnonymousJanuary 1st, 2009 at 7:10 am

Can any one shed some light on declining tax revenues due to the economic situation? how significant is the decline and how it will impact the fed budget and fed spending?

HayesJanuary 1st, 2009 at 10:01 am

Four Bad Bears: End of Year Updatehttp://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2009/01/four-bad-bears-end-of-year-update.htmlwith this great graph

You Name ItJanuary 1st, 2009 at 10:38 am

Isn’t financing to a wider range of car (home, credit card holder, businesses, etc.) what got us into this mess in the first place?

AnonymousJanuary 1st, 2009 at 10:41 am

I don’t have time to read through it, but I googled “impact of declining tax revenues on budget and spending” and got this, that may be of help?page of resultsbtw, I think David Cay Johnston is a superb source for tax truth. I didn’t google for what he’s had to say recently, but you might also try a search on his name?

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 10:43 am

As I paid my 2008 property taxes of $9,000 to meet the December 31 deadline for income tax deduction, I noticed that the county government is accepting American Express, Discover, MasterCard, and Visa for payment. I would venture a guess that a major portion of taxes this past year will be paid with plastic. I also venture a guess that as strapped out and unqualified “homeowners” default, the ravenous tax collectors will be strapping those uncollected bills to the backs of the people who are still managing to stretch ends to make them meet.I also venture a guess that Congress will continue its illicit bailouts of its credit “provider” pals, with your money.Any which way, the taxpayers get the shaft. To paraphrase Jerry Reed’s 1982 hit: the government gets the gold mine…including the gears in both cars…we get the shaft. It just hurts too much to laugh.“She Got the Gold Mine, I Got the Shaft”Well, I guess it was back in ’63When eatin’ my cookin’ got the better of me,So I asked this little girl I was goin’ with to be my wife.Well, she said she would, so I said “I do”.But I’da said I wouldn’t if I’da just knewHow sayin’ “I do” was gonna screw up all of my life!Well, the first few years weren’t all that bad –I’ll never forget the good times we had‘Cause I’m reminded every month when I send her the child support.Well, it wasn’t too long till the luv all died,And I’ll admit I wasn’t too surprisedThe day I come home and found my suitcase sittin’ out on the porch.Well, I tried to get in – she changed the locks!Then I found this note taped on the mailboxThat said, “Goodbye, turkey! My attorney will be in touch!” Mm-hmm…So I decided right then and thereI’s gonna do what’s right – give her her fair share.But brother – I didn’t know her share’s gon’ be THAT much!She got the gold mine! She got the gold mine!I got the shaft. I got the shaft.They split it right down the middle,And then they give her the better half.Well, it all sounds sorta funny,But it hurts too much to laugh.She got the gold mine – I got the sha-a-aft.Now, listen – you ain’t heard nothin’ yet:Why, they give her the color television set,Then they give her the house, the kids, and both of the cars! See?Well, then they start talkin’ ‘bout child support,Alimony, and the cost of the court –Didn’t take me long to figure out how far in the hole I was!I’m tellin’ ya, they have made a mistake‘Cause it adds up to more than this cowboy makes!Besides; everything I ever had worth takin’, they’ve already took!While she’s livin’ like a queen on alimony,I’m workin’ two shifts eatin’ baloney,Askin’ myself, “Why didn’t you just learn how to cook?!?!”They give her the gold mine! She got the gold mine!They give me the shaft. I got the shaft.They said they’re splittin’ it all down the middle,But she got the better half.Well, it all sounds mighty funny,But it hurts too much to laugh.She got the gold mine – I got the sha-a-aft.Well, she got the gold mine! She got the gold mine!I got the shaft. I got the shaft.They split it all down the middle,And then they give her the better half.Well, I guess it all sounds funny, Hoo, hoo, hoo, ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!But it hurts too much to laugh.She got the gold mine – I got the sha-a-aft.(They ain’t kiddin’ me – I got the shaft.)Well, I don’t have to worry ‘bout totin’ a billfold n’more.Hahahahaha…I let my wife tote it; I’m gonna be carryin’ food stamps –You get it, judge? I’m gonna be… Just… Hahahaha…Ah, it’s not funny, huh? Huh? Huh?Contempt of court? Whaddaya mean?[Incomprehensible]Hello, 2009.

blindmanJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:13 am

” we have to fight like hell to get back to a best version of our natural selves”" children understand that all the wonders of the mind need not be explicit.”"…keep the duck.”" my body is my ballot.” u. phillips

ex VRWCJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:16 am

PeteCA,I am looking also toward conflicts in places where we don’t expect to find it, much closer to home. For instance, we already have a low-intensity war zone down here in Arizona on the border. If you don’t believe me drive down there and count border patrol vehicles, and read the stories. Now, on the other side down in Mexico, there is increasing lawlessness now happening. Regularly police and soldiers are found killed by the dozens, brutally decapitated by drug gangs. I fear an unstable Mexico will export its comppletely lawless voilence over the border, and the southwest could become basically an overflow zone for a dying and corrupt Mexico and Latin America.Couple that with the depression-like conditions now starting in Phoenix, where the large illegal employee population will be displaced by legals who are moving down the employment chain (already happening, the fast food places are increasingly white and middle aged now here), rampant meth and other drugs , many, many vacant buildings, and municipalities and the state cutting back. Its a recipe for some real trouble, happening over time and will less drama than a shooting war, but nonetheless bad.

PsyopsJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:20 am

A happy new year everyone. I wish you and your loved ones happiness, peace, health and personal development. I also would like to express my gratitude to the Professor and the numerous kind blog contributors for helping me and my family navigate through these tough times. Be well all of you. Psyops

ex VRWCJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:53 am

How about some humor to cheer you up. News report from yesterday, ex VRWC style:The Fed announced the naming of a team of bankers and investment firms to conduct the purchase of some 500 Billion of MBS. “This program is being conducted as a model of transparency and openness”, said Henry Paulson, US Treasury Secretary. “We realize that a regular American business cannot even sell the government a hammer without going through a fair and open competition process, so we applied the same here.”The new program is designed to accelerate the free-fall in home prices by allowing banks to transfer their losses on bad home loans and other indecipherable derivatives the the US government with maximum speed and efficiency. “Banks need no longer fear foreclosing on their borrowers”, said Paulson, “because now Uncle Sam is holding the bag”.In a related move, Harvard announced the formation of the new Hank Paulson School of Federal Finance. The school will run the new MBA (Master’s of Bailout Acquisition) degree progams to prepare new graduates for the brave new world of government backed high finance. “Our schools need to be turning out experts in lining their pockets with golden fleece at taxpayer expense, especially to handle shoveling $500 billion of steaming crap onto the Federal books in such a short time”, said Paulson, himself a veteran of Goldman Sachs and a major recipient of fleece in the past.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 12:01 pm

@ Little Saver: “More startling still, however, is the behavior of narrow money in the form of the monetary base, which had been increasing at 3-to-4% per annum in the period to September, but has gone completely haywire since then, increasing at an annual rate of 990.9% in the three months to December. No, that’s not a typo, in those three months the monetary base has been increasing at almost 1,000% per annum. Over the last year, its average rate of increase is 86% per annum… (Martin Hutchinson @ Prudent Bear)”No wonder Benny the Bailer quit “issuing” his Fed M3 collateral damage reports and is conducting his cloak and dagger money operations in black secrecy. Add this piece of the puzzle to John Williams’ government stats configured by the more accurate pre-Clinton government method (see ptm at 31 11:43:23), and a dire economic pattern emerges. As Williams said about a year ago, we are on the Fedway to hyperinflation, with maybe a short deflationary pit stop, where the value of a $100 bill down the road will be worth a sheet of toilet paper in four to five years.With Tim the Fox replacing Packager Paulson in the US Treasury, and Et Tu Obama in the Big Oval, it should be nefarious banking schemes as usual with Fedster “Goldie” Friedman handling operations at NYFed gang headquarters.

JamesJanuary 1st, 2009 at 12:13 pm

Russia’s Gazprom cut off all gas deliveries to Ukraine. Link here. This is because of nonpayment and disagreement over 2009 price contracts. This may have implications for European gas as well.When I read this, it reminded me of a Weekly World News headline from several years ago: “US cuts off electricity to Mexico for nonpayment of bills.” Unfortunately, this time, it is not a joke.

marc weinerJanuary 1st, 2009 at 12:29 pm

if todays problems were caused by “credit excesses” how does more credit for malinvestments (McMansions, Hummers, and millions of polluting factories in third world nations) make the bad credit risks “good” and correct the previous misallocation of capital?IN ADDITION A COMMENT ABOUT THIS SITELets assume most readers here have undergraduate and probably graduate degrees. I would like an upgrade in this sites intellectual level. Nouriel if you are going to make a statements show me the math or its no better then Fox News. (That’s the lowest blow I can think of) We’ve all had calculus, micro,macro, finance. If we are going to discuss problems and their solutions lets discuss this at a level that requires “proofs” I wouldn’t mind a little free education from a professor at the Stern School of Business

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 1:08 pm

Thank you. Many of our readers work in the financial industry and many do have graduate degrees in the area of their expertise. If things do worsen I will be surprised because from the numbers I and my colleagues have studied, a bleak forecast is not in the picture for 2009. This is mostly due to the change is our country’s leadership. There will be programs which will target specific market maladies. Unfortunately, the evidence will not be available until the third quarter of this year.

Anonymous ibid.January 1st, 2009 at 1:28 pm

Redleg, I took a look at Thomas Ricks’ description of how Petraeus dealt with Mosul. While I see an admirable willingness to use methods other than force, I don’t see a systematic application of principles of counterinsurgency, nor did the peace last after Petraeus left. Successful counterinsurgency resolves grievances permanently.I think we will find that much of the progress in Iraq has been cosmetic, that the Iraqis are aware that the American people voted to wind down the occupation and are willing to wait before getting back to the business of killing one another. But time will tell.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 3:23 pm

On Lew Rockwell today ~”The Crisis in 10 Points” by Robert StewartThe 2007–2008 financial crisis had its genesis in the United States housing markets, but it rapidly spread to other economies, first to the United Kingdom, but then almost everywhere else, including such unlikely spots as Iceland whose banking system collapsed. Because events in the United States triggered the crisis, this essay will concentrate on the US causes although they had their many counterparts elsewhere.There are at least three long-standing background influences that contributed to the financial debacle that dominated the US economy in 2008:1. For almost 100 years, the US government has not felt constrained to match its expenditure with its revenue. This policy was given intellectual justification by the writings of John Maynard Keynes who argued in the 1930s that, during periods of slow economic growth, active and purposeful government policies would allow the economy to spend its way out of recession. It was simply a matter of time before citizens aped the financial habits of their governments by living beyond their means.2. The Federal Reserve System (the Fed – created in 1913) has accommodated government’s policy of spending to excess by inflating the money supply and keeping interest rates artificially low. Today’s dollar will buy what in 1913 would cost less than a nickel. This easy-money policy has not only led to inflation but has resulted in investments taking place that would not be justified had the money supply been constrained, and had interest rates more clearly reflected economic reality.3. Since the 1960s, politicians parroting the suspect theories of Keynes have fed the public’s naïve belief that government can provide ever-increasing living standards by means of its monetary and fiscal policies. Pulling a fiscal lever here and pushing a monetary button there meant that constraints on spending were old fashioned, and living standards would forever improve. The limitations imposed by the laws of economics had been repealed if you voted for politicians who promised to provide you with something for nothing. Fiscal prudence was simply a capitalist lie.It is against this long-term, more philosophic backdrop, that the following, more immediate issues, assumed greater importance.4. Households collectively made little attempt to save for the future. The United States, in particular, borrowed from China, Japan, and Middle Eastern countries to finance its spending addictions. Financial responsibility was considered an old-fashioned, or even an irrelevant, virtue, and people were led to believe that government could, by waving its magic wand, provide improved housing without the pain of saving or foregoing immediate consumption.5. The acquisition of a house was viewed by many buyers not so much as having somewhere to live but as a painless way to make money. House prices, they naively believed, would always continue to increase in value while the relative burden of mortgages would continue to fall. Not only that, but as house values increased, a house could be used as collateral for a further loan. The financial equivalent of turning sea water into gold had been created. So long as house prices increased, borrowers were in financial heaven. When house prices fell, the earth opened up under the feet of lenders.6. Government-sponsored entities like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac subsidized mortgages for people who, under more-prudent rules of borrowing, would never have qualified for a loan from a conservative banking institution. Congressman Barney Frank in 2003 stated in a moment of candor, “I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation toward subsidized housing.” Well he certainly did, at the same time accepting with gratitude campaign contributions from Fannie and Freddie.7. The egalitarian policies of government through such legislation as the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 “persuaded” lenders, Mafioso style, to lend to low-income borrowers, against their better judgment. Government lawyers made it clear that the consequences of failing to meet politically imposed targets and quotas could be dire.8. It was a matter of time before a substantial minority of borrowers could not or would not service their mortgages. Partly because astute people predicted this, well-known names in the financial world began to package, or sponsor, mortgage and other debts such as credit-card balances into what were called structured-investment vehicles (SIV), dubbed “financial weapons of mass destruction” by Warren Buffet. So complicated were the terms contained in such instruments that many legal minds and the credit-rating agencies were baffled as to exactly what they meant and where the ultimate risk lay. Banks and others could benefit by lending to people who could not afford to pay interest, far less capital, provided they were able to sell the SIVs to gullible investors. Money managers naively bought such investments for pension funds, money market funds, and (even more surprisingly) for their firms’ own accounts. This was the primrose path to unlimited housing ownership, with no painful cash deposit, and no adverse consequences to the first lenders.9. So long as (a) the value of housing increased, (b) borrowers paid on time, and (c) confidence remained in the credibility of SIVs, everything was hunky-dory. Unfortunately, all three cratered about the same time; house values stagnated or fell as supply exceeded demand; when values stuttered, so did borrowers repayments, and confidence plunged. Borrowers, having promised to pay and having offered security for their promises, were failing to pay because their security had declined in value. They repudiated their debts, and the burden fell on hapless financial institutions. Populist politicians rarely blamed the borrowers, because there are so many of them and they vote; instead they blamed greedy capitalists, speculators, short sellers, anyone except the debtors, and the imprudent economic policies of the US government.10. As events began to unravel in mid-2008, well-established firms like Lehman Brothers, went to the wall. Others like Bear Stearns and Merrill Lynch were sold at knockdown prices. Yet others, like insurance giant AIG, were effectively nationalized. Meanwhile, the stock-market value of banks and other financial institutions took a nosedive. For example, Citibank stock price fell by 79% between October 2008 and October 2009. The broader stock-market indices like the Dow Jones also plummeted by around 40%. The US government had no systematic policy, and rules were made up as more and more bad news emerged, especially about jobs. Citibank had a labor force of 375,000 in 2007; in November 2008, it was announced that 53,000 jobs would go by the first quarter of 2009. Senior government officials were like shipwrecked sailors (and were spending money like drunken sailors) paddling like mad but with little idea of where they were going, or why. The only consistent rule was that something had to be done, and the US government must be the action party.It is difficult not to recall the words of Herbert Spencer: “The ultimate result of shielding man from the effects of folly is to people the world with fools.”The financial crisis of 2007–2008 was a Ponzi scheme writ large. A Ponzi scheme, or chain letter, initially succeeds but eventually collapses, just as imprudent loans may at first succeed in their objectives but eventually the laws of economics come into play and expose the futility of the whole exercise. A pyramid scheme is always unsustainable for the simple reason that it is based on faulty principles and built on flawed foundations. Until too late, no one in authority (regulators, risk managers, senior bank executives, credit-rating agencies, investment analysts) asked the key question, namely, how on earth was it possible in the long term to make profits by lending money to people whose chances of paying it back were practically nil? The issue was simply swept under the carpet because loans to deadbeats provided a better short-term return than did lower-risk debt instruments.In summary, the essence of the subprime crisis is that money was lent (often through the agency of questionable mortgage brokers) at very low interest rates (courtesy of the Fed) to hundreds of thousands of people (all they needed was a credit score and a pulse) who could not afford to pay it back; and it was backed by collateral (a house) that was not properly valued.[7] Such assets, accurately described as “liar loans,” were then packaged into opaque securities, known as structured-investment vehicles (sponsored but not guaranteed by a respected and well-known name), which very few people understood. They were sold on to pension funds, banks, and others whose gullible investment managers also did not understand them and failed to carry out the rigorous analysis that their clients had a right to expect.Government encouraged all of this by supporting affordable housing (which was politically correct) and accusing banks of redlining (failing to lend to poor and black people in the same proportion as they lent to the rich and white). When the borrower, already maxed out on his credit cards, predictably failed to make payments, the scale of the problems eventually became apparent to somnolent regulators and financial institutions. Confidence and trust evaporated, because no one knew which institutions held suspect securities, how much the losses were, and who was ultimately safe. A financial system built on debt and excessive leverage was a financial system built on sand.The errors and fallacies that weave and surround this awful catalog of errors could have largely been avoided by paying attention to a single sentence written by Henry Hazlitt over 60 years ago:“The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the long effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.”Bob Stewart has lived in Bermuda all of his adult life, and was chief executive of the Royal/Dutch Shell Group of Companies in Bermuda until his retirement in 1998. Subsequently, he was President of Old Mutual Asset Managers, Bermuda, and retired from there at the end of 2002. He is a director of several Bermuda companies and investment funds, and the author of “A Guide to the Economy of Bermuda”.

Octavio RichettaJanuary 1st, 2009 at 3:41 pm

Dr. Doom – the original one, not the Professor – Also lost money with Mad-Off:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123068163425344045.htmlDECEMBER 31, 2008′Dr. Doom’ Didn’t Predict Madoff BlowupFamous Pessimist Lost Millions in Alleged Ponzi; Kevin Bacon, Kyra Sedgwick Caught Up, TooBy JENNY STRASBURGHenry Kaufman, the former Salomon Brothers chief economist whose bearish views decades ago earned him the nickname “Dr. Doom,” lost several million dollars with Bernard Madoff, making him one of the most prominent Wall Street figures to emerge as a victim of the alleged Ponzi scheme.Mr. Kaufman, 81 years old, had the money in a brokerage account with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities for more than five years, he said in an interview Tuesday.Meanwhile, a federal bankruptcy judge in Manhattan overseeing the liquidation of the Madoff firm on Tuesday approved a transfer of $28.1 million from one of Mr. Madoff’s bank accounts to the court-appointed trustee of the firm, who said the funds will be used for satisfying customer claims. On Wednesday, Mr. Madoff is expected to turn over details of his personal assets, liabilities and accounts to government investigators.Kevin Bacon, the actor who has appeared in movies from “Footloose” to “Frost/Nixon,” was also an investor in Madoff along with his wife, actress Kyra Sedgwick, Mr. Bacon’s spokesman Allen Eichhorn said Tuesday. The investment was earlier reported by New York magazine’s Web site.Mr. Kaufman earned the Dr. Doom nickname as a result of his consistent predictions while at Salomon Brothers in the 1970s and early 1980s that interest rates would rise and bond prices would fall.More recently, Mr. Kaufman was a director of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and was chairman of the Lehman board’s finance and risk committee before the Wall Street firm’s September descent into bankruptcy. …

Octavio RichettaJanuary 1st, 2009 at 3:54 pm

I think this was posted already, but here it goes again!:According to this guy, we are living in “The country formerly known as The United States of Amerika”:-) IMHO, this guy is totally nuts; isn’t he?http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123051100709638419.html

DECEMBER 29, 2008As if Things Weren’t Bad Enough, Russian Professor Predicts End of U.S.In Moscow, Igor Panarin’s Forecasts Are All the Rage; America ‘Disintegrates’ in 2010y ANDREW OSBORNMOSCOW — For a decade, Russian academic Igor Panarin has been predicting the U.S. will fall apart in 2010. For most of that time, he admits, few took his argument — that an economic and moral collapse will trigger a civil war and the eventual breakup of the U.S. — very seriously. Now he’s found an eager audience: Russian state media.n recent weeks, he’s been interviewed as much as twice a day about his predictions. “It’s a record,” says Prof. Panarin. “But I think the attention is going to grow even stronger.”Prof. Panarin, 50 years old, is not a fringe figure. A former KGB analyst, he is dean of the Russian Foreign Ministry’s academy for future diplomats. He is invited to Kremlin receptions, lectures students, publishes books, and appears in the media as an expert on U.S.-Russia relations.But it’s his bleak forecast for the U.S. that is music to the ears of the Kremlin, which in recent years has blamed Washington for everything from instability in the Middle East to the global financial crisis. Mr. Panarin’s views also fit neatly with the Kremlin’s narrative that Russia is returning to its rightful place on the world stage after the weakness of the 1990s, when many feared that the country would go economically and politically bankrupt and break into separate territories.A polite and cheerful man with a buzz cut, Mr. Panarin insists he does not dislike Americans. But he warns that the outlook for them is dire.”There’s a 55-45% chance right now that disintegration will occur,” he says. “One could rejoice in that process,” he adds, poker-faced. “But if we’re talking reasonably, it’s not the best scenario — for Russia.” Though Russia would become more powerful on the global stage, he says, its economy would suffer because it currently depends heavily on the dollar and on trade with the U.S.Mr. Panarin posits, in brief, that mass immigration, economic decline, and moral degradation will trigger a civil war next fall and the collapse of the dollar. Around the end of June 2010, or early July, he says, the U.S. will break into six pieces — with Alaska reverting to Russian control….

Average JaneJanuary 1st, 2009 at 4:21 pm

BLAST FROM THE PASTI was going through some old paperwork today and came across a newspaper from my hometown dated January 22, 1981. Just had to share this with all of y’all.Front Page Headline: “Freed hostages brutally treated while in Iran.”Below-the-fold front page headline: “Reagan tackles the economy.” From the AP article: “President Reagan is tackling the economy in earnest, with his aides promising to deliver a ‘unique and different’ recovery plan in three or four weeks. . . . Budget Director-designate David Stockman said . . . Reagan is working on a ‘sweeping, comprehensive, bold, far-reaching economic plan,’ including tax and budget cuts. ‘Our program will be one designed to jolt the economy, . . . It will be a full-throttle, four-year plan in which there will be no equivocation.”The local savings and loan was paying 14.721% interest on a six-month CD. The local credit union was offering 5.5% interest, compounded DAILY, on a “NOW” savings account with a minimum deposit of $500.Inflation was at 13.58%. The DJIA was at 963. The Federal Reserve interest rate was at 21.5%. Gasoline cost $1.19 a gallon. A new car cost $7,200.Food for thought.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 4:33 pm

It seems that we have come quite a long way from 1981 and there are similarities in some of the changes that we might see with the change in our country’s administration after January 20th.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 5:23 pm

Back then everyone had a high paying manufacturing job , no one needed credit. Unions were strong and workers were getting paid well.This time no savings no good paying jobs and wages are deflating while everything else inflates-much much worse.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 5:34 pm

I’ve checked this guy out before and he’s quite the fruit, when you get into the details and premise of his predictions they make very little sense.

economicminorJanuary 1st, 2009 at 5:40 pm

The problem with what you are assuming is that the data is reasonably accurate and that math can account for emotional responses.I believe the programmer’s axiom of garbage in and garbage out applies to this. The modeling that allowed the institutions to justify and sell all the toxic waste was supported by mathematical equations. Did that do any good when the data was faulty and or the complex equations were based upon unrealistic assumptions? Economics is so much more than math.As for the other, non mathematical part, you can not figure in for greed, fear or lies or lack of virtue. Once faith is broken, it isn’t a math equation that returns trust to those who were harmed. It takes a lot of time spent proving honor and integrity again and we are a long long way from that.The leadership is still in denial that we have a huge problem. Many believe that a button can be pushed here or a lever yanked over there and all will be right with the economy again. Good luck to you if you think that.This is about to much debt used for consumptive purpose. Those at the lower levels of the system have no ability to maintain their existence under the current burden of debt to be serviced and other obligations forced on them. Also we have a lot of mal investment to write down or write off. Investment in the wrong things that bring no benefit to our way of life under the conditions we find ourselves. Strip malls to feed people living in McMansions built 100 miles from work where there is no efficient economical transportation system. Warehouses and buildings used to store and sell consumer products that we can no longer afford because to much of our limited real income goes to repay debt which was used to buy those unaffordable McMansion and the SUV and the fuel and the ….. big screen TVs etc.You don’t seem to get it… We spent our future income on yesterday’s pleasures and now we are left with the bills and the interest and we still have to live… And we have less real income to pay for it all with. Sure gas is cheaper but is insurance, health care, food or taxes? Even my utility bills have gone up in the last few years. Most everything I need has gone up except my income in the last couple of years.An economy based on debt for past consumption is not a sustainable economy. We have run to the end of the road and we now see the cliff and your answer is you don’t believe it and want to see the math?Here is some version of math for you. Graph of total debt to GDP.Or total debt to income. I have seen quite a few charts like this over the years, I am not a mathematician or statistical analyst but many like this quote federal sites as data sources. This is the quickest one I could find to link to today. Some show differences in our current and past levels of debt but all are similar in the scope of the story they tell. To much total debt was not sustainable before and we have a similar situation now. To much total debt to our income..And what this doesn’t show is how income has moved from Main Street to a few of the wealthiest among us. It doesn’t show how the richest have benefited in the last decade of inflation from debt or how truly poor much of America has become.And deflation is how the system deals with it….I don’t know how this all works itself out but I do know that more of how we got here is as insane as insane gets. And that denial will not shelter you from any of the consequences.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 5:48 pm

Debt can be wiped out and all it does is set the stage for massive growth and new debt to be created. Just like a drug addict who goes clean and finds life much more rewarding. The withdrawal symptoms are going to hurt but we’ll come out healthier.Credit has never been the U.S. strength as a nation people here have a spark in their eye for creation for dreaming. The political system we have albeit somewhat corrupt and our traditional lead in the world for human rights and fairness has always been our true strength this has always been the back drop of our financial strength and dominance. Those core underlying beliefs won’t go away just because credit dries up and debt has to be forgiven in fact they may awaken to new levels.

FredJanuary 1st, 2009 at 5:56 pm

If you haven’t yet, go to http://www.generationaldynamics.com and read up on the research John J. Xenakis has done. He has some specific predictions about global conflicts and the economy based the Generational Dynamics theory.He tends to be a bit blustery and cocksure in his predictions but in general the Generational Dynamic theory has a tremendous amount to recommend it. He has done a lot of reaeasrch and is a very sharp guy.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 6:00 pm

I just read a a Martin Hutchinson article, excerpt as follows “In the second half of 2009, we are likely to see the full power that a collapsing bond market can wield.The result of bond market collapse will be a second downward leg of the recession, its power proportional to the excessive monetary and fiscal weapons that have been used in the attempt to escape from the first leg. It is likely to be deeper than the first downturn, and much more prolonged, since the normal forces producing rapid economic recovery will be thwarted by “crowding out” in the capital markets and the high real interest rates necessary to fight inflation.”Is this consistent with Elliot wave?Anyone familiar with the Bond market?Please provide some enlightment.

ex VRWCJanuary 1st, 2009 at 6:35 pm

@marc weinerYou call for more proofs. It seems to me the great unknown in any economic equation is the variable of human behavior. I can go find material that ‘proves’ we are headed into a deflationary death spiral and I can find ‘proofs’ that we will exit a recession in 2009. In each case the difference is assumptions about human behavior.I think we can safely say that economics is an inexact science. Many with advanced degrees and armed with their proofs have been so wrong, and a few have been right. Finance experts told us we could manage default risk with derivatives. They proved it with their numbers. They were tragically wrong.This is not trying to devalue the science of economics. But the system they are trying to predict and control is way more complex than the models allow for.My graduate degree is in engineering, and my economic experience is real world. I remember one thing that was drilled into me in high school economics – one law that is always true. TANSTAAFL. There Ain’t No Such Thing As A Free Lunch. Somebody always pays. It seems to me the economists, the bailout masters, are violating this one law. They expect to stimulate and bail out at will and hope it will just work. Who pays?The arguments presented for why we are not facing another depression boil down to:Unemployment is not as bad as the 30s (if they measured it the same as they did back then it is getting a lot closer)They are flooding the market with liquidity and not repeating mistakes made in the past (except solvency is the problem, not credit availability)EM will adjust to take up trade imbalance (except they aren’t)In any case, how do economists resolve the violation of the TANSTAAFL law? We are trying to get something for nothing? I am interested to see that proof for how we can violate this law.ex VRWC

FAMCJanuary 1st, 2009 at 6:56 pm

Reposting quotes (12-20-2008) on this site”Economics has never been a science – and it is even less now than a few years ago.”Paul Anthony SamuelsonAND”Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists.”John Kenneth Galbraith

Wolf in the WildsJanuary 1st, 2009 at 7:10 pm

To All,I hope everyone has a fruitful 2009, though I suspect markets and the general world economy is going to get more insane. I wish happiness to all and hope we will survive this new insane world.

redlegJanuary 1st, 2009 at 8:00 pm

The problem with Mosul is that there was a change of command, and the 101st’s relief was more old school. So Petraeus’ command’s work was eventually undone.The whole Iraq situation was, is and will continue to be a clusterf#@k. I’m a critic, not a cheerleader.Petraeus is the best available by far. He actually did lead, not simply execute orders. Visionaries are few and far between in society and even more so in the military, so to find a leader that can stand up to adversity in a positive way is worthy of praise.

little annJanuary 1st, 2009 at 8:28 pm

Wolf, I enjoy your posts and your attitude. I only hope that Obama is for real and not a “look”. ( I realize the chances are slim.) I’m filled with a sense of foreboding because of all the difficult decisions that must be made and the responsibility we all have to see that our leaders are truly working to put things right. The intelligence and courage of the people on this blog to even attempt to make grassroots changes is admirable and to all of you who have provided a place to feel “at home” I want to say “thank you” and may the unexpectedly wonderful happen to you all.

HolyCowPuncherJanuary 1st, 2009 at 8:33 pm

ok to clarify what I meant with above:Inflation does not automatically result from the Fed creating more money. Inflation only results in higher consumer prices if that more money somehow gets to the consumers. Currently that is clearly not the case. In the U.S. consumers are suffering, and the country is experiencing deflation more than inflation.The other reason I gave as cause of higher prices is increases in raw material or shipping costs, but (as long as this is caused by speculation) it has nothing to do with the government creating more money.I also said that it is more believable that inflation could well be a result of perception. In any case I did not say that it does not exist.My main point is against the claim that there is automatic inflation because the government creates money. If this was true, the connection would have to be somehow “magical”. But magic does not exist. Everything that occurs in this Universe occurs according to a process; otherwise it would not occur. And every process has a mechanism. Every mechanism, on the other hand, can be described. We do not currently know the mechanism for every process under the sun (e.g. how the entire universe works etc), but they are all describeable when sufficient knowledge has been acquired.

kilgoresJanuary 1st, 2009 at 8:36 pm

What I find fascinating about the ‘Four Bad BearMarkets’ graph is that it reflects clearly that at 20 November 2008, when the current downturn was about 310 markets days old, the S&P had fallen DEEPER at -51.9% than the Dow had fallen (max. -47.9%) in the downturn that became the Great Depression during the same 310-market-day period.SWK

jomosJanuary 1st, 2009 at 8:49 pm

Very consistent with elliot wave as practiced by Prechter, Robert. His long term, intermediate term forcast take the SP500 below 400 at the bottom. We are very early into this secular bear not bottoming till 2014 +/- 2 years. I am not as familiar with bonds but keep in mind that from 1982 till recently interest rates have been coming down and we are at negative real rates, today.

blindmanJanuary 1st, 2009 at 9:45 pm

@ economicminor, or others.new year thought, 2009, here we go…..much of the increased wealth that is now being lost belonged to the1 to 5 percent of the wealthiest. they didn’t need it in the first place except to advance the trend of globalization and “invest” in emerging markets, exploit new resources.the loss of jobs in certain industries is painful and is a real problem for us all but is part of the globalist plan.the fact that our prosperity has been predicated on irrational bubble based economic development for many yearsis also a problem because we have reached the point where there is no nextnew speculative bubble to transition to and nothing sustainable to return to. so the debt based system played out and here we are in debt seemingly without even a global investor?and debt is growing for the sake of systemic salvation, but, the system is a failure? soo. …we are at that place where our assumptions need reexamination, all of them.the global system or the system of globalization has suffered tremendous losses.unregulated it ran itself into a wall. this is the nature of global capitalism andit is the nature of the traditional corporation. the psychopath in the environment and in the community. initially much of the pathology could be exported. with technology and the information revolution that pathology came right back to us undeniably.the “system” lied to it’s customers and itself and now has to be propped up by the central banks for the sake of the globalist. this will fail as these “persons” are not capableof transparency and integrity, ( not part of the charter ). they are not even capable of describing their economicplan to the people of the world nor do they see it as desirable or necessary. they tried to accomplish their goal in a “shadow” system initially. it failed due to corruption bred of opacity and greed. now, in decline, the individual is questioning the nature of the relationships and power balance between the individual and the corporation vs the nation and the international corporation.in the first case the individual is bought out to do the bidding of the corporation.becoming a spokesmen or representative of a legal entity with no social responsibility other than the bottom line of the shareholder. money, and we are losing faith in that.in the second case the national representative, power justified as representative of the people, is bought out by the influence of the global corporation. the global corporation has proved itself to be, well, pathological and psychopathic..on this new year we are acutely aware of uncertainty. more so than in years past.we are also aware that it is a man who was dubbed dr. doom and his integrity andclarity that provides this center of gravity. no pun intended but collapse seemspossible. going successfully forward will require not only accurate and clear observationof the real conditions and relationships but understanding of the quality of the structures andtheir undeniable functions and how this intersects with humanity. so the question is ” what is threatening to collapse”?the “system”. ” systemic” failure is the fear and the thing that the fed and the governmentsare attempting to resuscitate. we are seeing the system trying to save itself and theassumption we are expected to make is that this is in our interest, as we are co dependent contrary to the principle that it “should” be dependent on us.however we are not provided with the information necessary to make this argument or come to this conclusion. bloomberg suesfed for information. denied. CM selective reporting, non-reporting of relevant news.the media and population are mostly preoccupied with enter. de. tainment.people are overwhelmingly unaware, and of the opinion ,that their direct involvement in the solutionto the problem is not essential as it is bigger than we are? it seems the global “solution” will be implemented by strangersand then humanity, the people of the world will be faced with “realities” thatthey/we will then have to satisfy and negotiate. the top down option.the bottom up option would be different with a resulting different structureand function. it would be a revolution of responsibility on the part of individuals and legal persons, corporations. ( of, by and for the people)we are currently at the point where we can recognize certain realitieswith regard to the relationships extant between the environment, the individual,government, and the corporation ( rightful legal person with no humanity).we are seeing the global / international corporations character in the currentcrisis writ large. nakedly pathological. as we identify with this structure we feelvoid of principles and engage in inhuman activity without even being conscious of it.it is just business. a social norm. like credit default swaps, if they are ubiquitousthey become not only harmful but they provide the illusion of protection.this is the system as it interacts with the human mind, it’s attention manipulated intoblindly serving the unsustainable opaque global feedback loop for the sake ofindividual comfort , “splendid isolation” (w.zivon) under threat of annihilation fromwithdrawal of paternal care or application of foreign or domestic terror. a fit and a start/stop on the road to globalization.recent events ..suggest globalists see the destruction of americas 20th century manufacturing and consumingbase as an opportunity toincrease the “efficiency” of the global market. this “efficiency” requires a dependency that has / will fundamentallyalter the nature of governance on this and all continents as globalist/ corporate agendas supercedenational or individual concerns. the information base of the globalist planner, architect, decoupled from the information base of thelocal consumer and producer. decoupling of individuals from their humanity for the sake of psychological survival and productivity seems at least partially necessary.global systemic function superseding national independence the central banks are blatantlyignoring all liabilities with regard to their respective populations.can global neoliberal economics work for poor, middle class or wealthy people? individual people, human beings?i would suggest that local self sufficiency mechanisms need to be incorporated into any global market participant in the event that global structures and functions are destroyed by naked fraud or inherent psychopathy.

jomosJanuary 1st, 2009 at 9:50 pm

Listened to the 5 part interview with Norman Dodd.Makes perfect sense with the dummy ing down of the students that has been going on for at least 40 years. They will have their day,temporarily, but ultimately they fail totally, I have read their future and it is not promising.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 9:57 pm

The FEDs math is really quite simple: Huge prior debt ($10.6 trillion + new bailout debt ($10 trillion) = problem solved

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 10:56 pm

You may be naive, but you are playing the part of a fifth column, government paid, FUD spreading shrill. The only magic here is your obfuscation of simple facts.Inflation/deflation is not a theory; it is a simple statement that the same item costs more or less year-to-year. These measurements are reported by the BLS for retail and wholesale.This country has not seen deflation in 96 years; which why the 2009 dollar is only worth $0.04 of a 1913 dollar. Great Depression deflation in the early 1930s was about 15%, but subsequent inflation erased that deflation in a few years. Yes, gas prices have deflated, but the overall profile of cost of goods and services has inflated. This is not a perception issue, it is an objective measurement.It is because of people’s poor long term perception that inflation can exist and you are using that poor perception to twist the issue to your goal of arguing that it does not exist.Money supply is a theory taken from any intro to macroeconomics text: The Fed creates new money through loans. These new loan dollars have the same power of existing money, but as the new dollars move among the expense and revenue columns of corporate balance sheets at a given frequency, there are now more dollars chasing the same goods and services and buyers are willing to pay more to get the same as before.Thus there exists a one-to-one correlation between increases in money supply, the rate of money turnover, a delay interval, and the rate of inflation. Money supply theory and correlation does not prove a mechanism; however, they do supply a predictor that one can use with confidence between Fed feeding money to the system and higher prices?.

JamesJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:12 pm

What Reagan did was to borrow heavily on our future. He was basically the first one to blow up the budget deficit. It made him seem like a hero at the time. We felt strong because we were spending the money of our future. He was greatly loved. But the piper needs to be paid and the time is finally coming due. The worst part of the story is the idolatry by the current GOP and their belief that ‘if Reagan did it, it’s okay.” This played a major part in the mindset that lead us to where we are today. In fact, Cheney has said “deficits don’t matter.” We are seeing clearly that they do.

JamesJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:26 pm

I think you hit the nail on the head. Like Mark Twain said, “There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.” Maybe A + B = C, but if A and B are changing, C isn’t going to look like you expect it to be. I would be careful equating economists with “bailout masters.” Bailout masters have an agenda and aren’t so interested in finding the truth, as real economists are. Those so-called economists employed by Wall Street are not real economists in my opinion. At least they have ulterior motives that trump any search for the truth.

GuestJanuary 1st, 2009 at 11:46 pm

In the 1/2/09 WSJ there is an article on titled The Doomsayers Who Got it Right. They list 6:- Einhorn- Faber- Grant- Kasriel- Paulson (John, not Hank)- SchillerHow could Roubini be left off such a list? There’s a lot of great thinkers there, but how could you leave off Roubini? Einhorn over Roubini? Geeze, I’m disapointed in the WSJ.

YveJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 12:29 am

Now I’m really confused. I thought it was “hell in a handcart”. My grandmother used to say “handbasket” sometimes. Just when I thought I was getting this whole financial meltdown thingy figured out, now this.

jugglingcdosJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 1:05 am

yup, but asian mkts are green, HK,Singapore,Korea 1-3%”I suspect markets and the general world economy is going to get more insane”By Wolf in the Wilds on 2009-01-01 19:10:58

Little saverJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 1:36 am

Transparency once was an issue, isn’t it? Not anymore, it seems, in the age of Bernanke and Madoff.

Little SaverJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 1:50 am

As taxpayer and saver, I’m proud to fulfill my role as the last fool in the giant Ponzi (or Fomzi) scheme in order to keep the consumption economy going. More is better, it seems, almost by definition, or is it by axioma?

Wolf in the WildsJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 2:19 am

Its a sucker rally. Low volume and hoping to draw in retail. But with Singapore’s 4th quarter GDP at -12.5% yoy (which is worse than the Asian Crisis), I am not certain if retail would bite. In any case, no one here seems to know what is going on. Lets see if it draws stupid buyers into the market next week….

Little SaverJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 2:29 am

Which math? The one the banks used? How can math be applied when there is no way to obtain objective information on the value of assets? Math could be useful if there weren’t so many unknowns.To quote a former top executive of the US government: “because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know.” Now, let’s start with the math.I agree math can be useful, but first there must be reliable models to work with. I don’t think we have one that works in current conditions.To start the year with a laugh: some more quotes from that former US government top executive, somehow they explain very well how this great country got in such a mess, with or without using math:”[Osama Bin Laden is] either alive and well or alive and not too well or not alive.”"I am not going to give you a number for it because it’s not my business to do intelligent work.” -asked to estimate the number of Iraqi insurgents while testifying before Congress”Needless to say, the President is correct. Whatever it was he said.”"There’s another way to phrase that and that is that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. It is basically saying the same thing in a different way. Simply because you do not have evidence that something does exist does not mean that you have evidence that it doesn’t exist.” -on Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction”It is unknowable how long that conflict [the war in Iraq] will last. It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months.” -in Feb. 2003″Well, um, you know, something’s neither good nor bad but thinking makes it so, I suppose, as Shakespeare said.”"Secretary Powell and I agree on every single issue that has ever been before this administration except for those instances where Colin’s still learning.”"Learn to say ‘I don’t know.’ If used when appropriate, it will be often.”"I don’t know what the facts are but somebody’s certainly going to sit down with him and find out what he knows that they may not know, and make sure he knows what they know that he may not know.”"I’m not into this detail stuff. I’m more concepty.”"If I know the answer I’ll tell you the answer, and if I don’t, I’ll just respond, cleverly.”

GuestJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 3:00 am

The bottomline is that Fed’s actions aren’t going to do jack. There seems to be a view that excess liquidity will reflate the economy, but lets analyze this argument within the context that the American consumer is shopped out. The idea is that, banks would start lending again getting cheaper loans at 0 percent, and would have every incentive to lend. The consumer would get the money and spend it thus stimulating demand and leading to recovery. But precisely because they are getting the loans at 0 percent and not 5 percent is why they will not lend. If the American consumer is “too” risky, they’d rather hold the cash and see it become worth more– in a deflationary context– rather than risk it to the consumer and let it become a bad debt (of course this pertains to the “sub-prime” consumer). If the fed was supplying money at 5 percent, there is an incentive to lend as holding the money equals a loss of 5 percent. Nothing can prevent the coming prolonged deflation and depression. If anything, logic holds that–unless flawed and please do point if it is the case– Feds action will only exacerbate the problem. Of course the underlying assumption for this is that the american consumer is a risky debt, but would anyone suggest otherwise at this point?It will ultimately only depend on the American consumer, how rrisky how much of it is. Accepted that a person with fine credibility won’t consitute a bad debt and thus would get the loans because of excess liquidity, but a person with a fine credit is a rational person who spends within his means, so basically he wouldn’t go on a spending spree knowing that he might lose his job tomorrow, seeing his equity dwindling, and the like. Besides even if this would be the positive side, the problem with the risky consumer will be further exacerbated since lending to them will come to a halt.

GuestJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 3:49 am

At least they have ulterior motives that trump any search for the truth.

I would guess sometimes the motives can be as simple as just wanting to keep a job. I think this is the reason why some accountants have went with the CEOs/CIOs/other-department-heads requests to cook the books. Or why some house appraisers are willing to appraise a house at a higher value than warranted. I am not justifying this sort of behavior, just reporting what I think is probably quite common.

painterJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 4:09 am

when i was just a teen in early 70′s i could not understand how a system could continue while jobs at that time were becoming more and more paper pushing, then later, key board pushing.I spent some time in greenwich con. over christmas and as usual not a word could be spoken that there was any trouble. And even heard that paying 3% more in taxes is way to much for universal health care, and why, because people who don’t have health care are bums and undeserving. Besides, that 3% would mean their child would not get the better school.The matrix was on hbo last night and more and more it seems to have more to do with reality.But then again when i was a teen i ate the pill that opened up my mind and freed me and now i struggle to get food for my kids as others dont see anything wrong and puff out there chest while sending their kids to a better collage. Maybe it is their world and nothing is wrong with it. That would suck, so Excuse me while i burn their flag.

Octavio RichettaJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 4:12 am

Professore, what the Hell where you doing on Bloomberg TV at 1:30 AM EST?:-) Is Dat the way you are gonna start the new year? You are supposed to rest! You look cool but a bit tense. A bit of Botox would not be a bad idea:-)I just completed my numbers for 2008. I clocked in 12.81%. This year was my year of revenge against the hedge funds which had put me to shame for the last 10 years:-)

AnonymousJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 6:49 am

“whom is worthy of that moniker” -> who, not whom. Who is the subject of the clause.”whom I have spoken about Petraeus…” -> with whom I have…

Eleftherios PerdikakisJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 6:56 am

There will be no hyper-mega-terra-inflationMr.NR knows something we do not knowhttp://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/140012/Dr.-Doom-Foresees-Much-More-Pain-So-Why-Is-Roubini”the most bullish guy”?

GuestJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 7:13 am

what lady? The harlot that rides the scarlet red beast? It is still alive. It won’t die until the “ten kings” first give their power to the beast (Rev 17:12-13). I am sure they will need to do something like that because this crisis is quite severe…On the other hand other chess pieces need to be in place first as well. Need to have civilian rights, executive power, surveillance and tactical urban warfare capabilities in the right “settings”…all of these chess pieces have been moved towards their places especially within the last 8 years.

jomosJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 8:14 am

If you knew that it wasn’t sustainable than why did you participate ?, leader’s response, “…when the music is playing, everyone must dance…”

jomosJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 8:24 am

Thank you! Big Saver, for helping me coin “FOMzi scheme (Federal Open Market)” into wikipedia in 2009. What a goal.) Honey, we are going viral…. Well, stay away from me!

HayesJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 8:32 am

Mr. Rajan Was Unpopular (But Prescient) at Greenspan Party WSJ * JANUARY 2, 2009

To outline his fears about the U.S. economy, Raghuram Rajan picked a tough crowd.It was August 2005, at an annual gathering of high-powered economists at Jackson Hole, Wyo. — and that year they were honoring Alan Greenspan. Mr. Greenspan, a giant of 20th-century economic policy, was about to retire as Federal Reserve chairman after presiding over a historic period of economic growth.Mr. Rajan, a professor at the University of Chicago’s Booth Graduate School of Business, chose that moment to deliver a paper called “Has Financial Development Made the World Riskier? ” His answer: Yes.Mr. Rajan quickly came under attack as an antimarket Luddite, wistful for old days of regulation…Many of the big names in Jackson Hole weren’t ready to hear the warning. Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, famous among economists for his blistering attacks, told the audience he found “the basic, slightly lead-eyed premise of [Mr. Rajan’s] paper to be misguided.” Read More

economicminorJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 10:17 am

Yes! Yes and not necessarily.When the overall debt becomes so big that it is unsustainable and now collapsing, writing it down can be devastating. The fantasy accounting is paying people today beyond the income and the fantasy government accounting is still paying people beyond its real income. As this continues to wind down more and more states, counties, cities and pension funds will eventually be unable to continue their outlays at these levels. As reality re-enters the system and real mark to market occurs after the write downs, their outlays decline, so does rents, house prices, retail sales, etc… This is a downward spiral that no one has any real idea of where the bottom will be. Few living today in the US has ever seen what is happening. Most are in denial, yet most feel it and the feeling runs from being uncomfortable to outright fear.The bottom will be below where real economic value of debt and real value added production (ability to pay) come together. I have no idea where that is but it is way below the false GDP that is currently being touted today.The last time we had a debt pyramid of this magnitude, which wasn’t this big, was in 1929/30… This one is larger and I think this time we have less ability to pay because of demographic differences. We have fewer people (percentatge) working in real value added employment than we did then. Few people live on the farms. Soooooo many more live off the system in one way or another. (back then almost no one lived off the system)I have been watching this coming to us for more than a decade and now that it is happening, I can tell you I am extremely nervous about the outcome.The insanity of debt goes way beyond what is on the surface. Most apartment complexes have debts against them far in excess of the actual incomes. Many commercial complexes make no sense as to their debt to incomes. I have looked at many in my region over the last decade and have never found one commercial project that I could pencil out for a private investor. Larger corporations and 1031 tax exchanges had special advantages of write offs or tax breaks that straight private investment didn’t. But that doesn’t make them profitable. The scam was always to hold for a few years and sell to a greater fool… Or inflation in property values drove up the values… Not that rents or incomes would rise adequately to make them make sense…So as this contraction continues and deflation becomes a belief… That is what the government is trying to stop from happening…. what happens to all these smaller commercial investments? If their incomes are falling and you can’t inflate, with so much debt based on the belief of inflation not on reality of incomes, what do you think is going to happen?We could easily only be in the third inning of this game or the first quarter because as I have expounded before about how and why the re-inflation can not work. Not that they can’t create inflation but that they can’t re-inflate the property bubble or stop the debt bubble from collapsing. You need income to sustain debt and a lot of our debt was just used up on consumption and very little went into production in the US or even real value added jobs that pays off debts.Yes we can write it down and write it off but this is a huge ponzi pyramid to write down. Things will look much different in the US after we have done that. Good bye soccer moms living in McMansions in a gated community 100 miles from where they or their spouses work (if they still have a job). Good bye to so many people living off the system on pensions. Maybe even good bye to SS and Medicare. And Empire building on a credit card… And so much of what we take for granted today.Denial will not do much good at this point except make things worse but that is where we are as a country.. Better to be viewed as the Ostrich Society led by the Marie Antoinettes.

economicminorJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 1:03 pm

I too ate the pill, moved to the country and was hungry for years. Then I decided that with out capital you had nothing in this system. No security, no future, so I have been accumulating capital, not debt, ever since. My wife and I have lived below our means for 25 years. Let me tell, it is extremely difficult to do that in this world and to get ahead unless you are lucky or extremely gifted, of which I am neither. I still live in the country but now have no debt, a house I built and sufficient capital to get me thru my soon elder years, unless I get wiped out by some unseen event(s).I would love to *invest* in the future of America but have most of my capital in cash in lousy paying accounts because I would rather be safe than sorry. Under current conditions, there is nothing to invest in. Only things to gamble on.My research has determined that deflation is most likely for the next few years rather than inflation which is why cash. I am not married to that position even though I may sound like it when someone reads my writings. They are as much about me organizing my thoughts and putting them out there to be criticized as anything else. I found out years ago that it is easy to marry an opinion and then spend all your energies reinforcing it. That is not productive. So…. Even though it hurts, please throw your criticism at my thoughts as I would rather be right and survive and enjoy the rest of my life as opposed to the alternative.Thanks to everyone on this blog and thanks to the Professor for providing it and his writings and video. He is a hero and a man with more than integrity. He is gifting to us his most precious asset, his knowledge and thoughts. We are truly blessed.

economicminorJanuary 2nd, 2009 at 3:22 pm

Besides, the rational consumer can already get a loan. I use my cc every month, charge $2 to 4k and the cc company raised my limit. My company sells houses and anyone with decent credit and a little down has been getting loans. I know of none with good credit and a good job history that have been turned down.We were in a dept store before the holidays and there was this deal, 10% plus an additional 20% off all new cards, so we stood there and the clerk did the application and we were readily approved..So I don’t know, WHO is it that can’t get a loan?I assume, people with poor credit histories or inadequate income to debt ratios.And if this is all about lending to some corporation to build another superstore when we have so much retail already in trouble, I say WHY? to what purpose?All this garbage about credit is a smoke screen for something else. Don’t know what but it is like an excuse to cover up the fact that we are in a deflationary cycle and that there is not a thing the government can do about it….

Anonymous ibid.January 2nd, 2009 at 8:35 pm

Redleg, if a change in command leads to a reversal of counterinsurgency gains, then either the new guy is really bad or the gains were illusory. An argument can be made for the former.I also do credit Petraeus for knowing something about counterinsurgency, meaning I agree with you that he supplied leadership. Counterinsurgency was the last thing on the minds of Bush and Rumsfeld. They thought the Iraqis wanted to be occupied, so any dissenters must be Baathist “dead-enders” or Al Qaida. And most of the commanders went along with this distorted view.I am just concerned that Petraeus seems to be being built up for political reasons, possibly for a run for the presidency. The shoddy scholarship that David Price documented went into the Field Manual on counterinsurgency is a suggestion that Petraeus is part flim-flam.

Leo70January 2nd, 2009 at 11:40 pm

I agree with most of what you say, with the notable exception of your concept of segregating contributions. That is absolute idiocy. It is simply impossible to use any statistics (i.e., actuary tables) when the sample size is one. And that is what is wrong with 401ks. You have no idea how long you’re going to live, and that’s exactly why the only pension system that makes sense is a defined benefits system. That is the same reason why we have car insurance, property insurance, etc. The fact that in virtually all countries such pension systems have been poorly run does not mean that the alternative (defined contributions) is better.Re how they’ll plug the whole, the answer is pretty simple: they will confiscate all the 401Ks, IRAs, etc. There is simply no other way… as you correctly pointed out the only alternative is the Weimar Republic.

GuestJanuary 3rd, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Hi, I also am,or was a jewelery manufacturer, I just lost my last account. China has a lot to answer for, they copied everything I did and sold it for half, however the discerning public could not see that what was made in China that was a copy of my jewelery was nothing like the same quality. I guess peoples standards really are low.

CHRIS DAVISJanuary 5th, 2009 at 12:15 am

Above post completely ignores key variable, Velocity of Money, which if examined,piece would have shown is presently COLLAPSING, ie, no one is borrowing “cheap”money, because borrowers are already maxed out and in deflationary environment zero interest rate is NOT cheap. Secondly, “inflation”, ie, price inflation has weak second derivative relationship to expansion of money supply(money inflation) due to huge significance of goods & labor supply on this variable, eg, China: too many laborers producing too many goods at too many factories almost insures you will NOT see inflation of goods prices any time soon.In theory, inflation possible if govts most major economies simultaneously implement massive stimulus, putting majority of unemployed back to work: then you would see goods inflation. This is actually very easy to estimate, eg, what is cost, for instance, of USG putting 2.0m unemployed back to work at 50k per annum?(If you don’t like 50k, be my guest and insert new number) $100bn?? BUT, what wastotal HEW(home equity withdrawal) number for last whole year, 2007, where American consumer was on credit binge? Hint: much larger than $100bn we were going to pay 2.0m unemployed Americans, that’s why Obama discussing 500-700bn plan, which would in fact, replace missing HEW piece.So USG could possibly, on a temporary basis, restimulate economy to former high-HEW level. But what about Europe, Japan, China, BRICs, Oil Producers and everybody else??? Remember, previous level of global economic activity was based on weak premise of easy credit, so what if non-US players understimulate?? Then overhang of surplus of goods + labor remains and prices stay low/continue to fallwhile Fed continues to expand money supply………So real question of above piece should be, what happens to the dollar if US economy receives strong stimulus where others receive only weak??

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Congratulations to Edward Hugh whose EconoMonitor blog was #14 on CBNC's NetNet list of best alternative financial and economic blogs. Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.