EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

Latest Project Syndicate Column: Has Global Stag-Deflation Arrived? …and comment on the Fed ZIRP decision

Project Syndicate has published my latest column on the risks of a global stag-deflation.

The column elaborates on the idea of stag-deflation that I discussed as early as January 2008 when I first warned about the risk of a global deflation and stag-deflation. While it is now fashionable to talk about such deflationary risks – and the US CPI figures today confirm that we are entering into deflation – some of us were worrying about the coming deflation well before the mainstream – concerned with short-run and unsustainable increases in commodity prices – discovered the deflationary risks in the global economy. It was clear to those of us that saw early on the risks of a severe US and global recession that, once that recession would emerge, deflationary rather than inflationary pressures would emerge as slack in goods markets, slack in labor markets and slack in commodity markets would emerge. So now we need to worry about stag-deflation, deflation, liquidity traps and debt deflation. Welcome to the world of stag-deflation or, as Krugman would put it, to the world of “depression economics”.

Here is the text of my column followed by a short comment on the just announced Fed decision to reduce the target for the Fed Funds rate to a 0% to 0.25% range:

Has global stag-deflation arrived?

Traditionally, central banks have been the lenders of last resort, but now they are becoming the lenders of first and only resort

By Nouriel Roubini

The latest macroeconomic news from the US, other advanced economies and emerging markets confirms that the global economy will face a severe recession next year. In the US, recession started last December, and will last at least until next December — the longest and deepest US recession since World War II, with the cumulative fall in GDP possibly exceeding 5 percent.

The recession in other advanced economies (the euro zone, the UK, the EU, Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand) started in the second quarter of this year, before the financial turmoil in September and October further aggravated the global credit crunch. This contraction has become even more severe since then.

There is now also the beginning of a hard landing in emerging markets as the recession in advanced economies, falling commodity prices and capital flight take their toll on growth.

Indeed, the world should expect a near recession in Russia and Brazil next year, owing to low commodity prices, and a sharp slowdown in China and India that will be the equivalent of a hard landing (growth well below potential) for these countries.

Other emerging markets in Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe will not fare better, and some may experience full-fledged financial crises. More than a dozen emerging-market economies now face severe financial pressures: Belarus, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Turkey and Ukraine in Europe; Indonesia, South Korea and Pakistan in Asia; and Argentina, Ecuador and Venezuela in Latin America.

Most of these economies can avoid the worst if they implement the appropriate policy adjustments and if the international financial institutions — including the IMF — provide enough lending to cover their external financing needs.

With a global recession a near certainty, deflation — rather than inflation — will become the main concern for policymakers. The fall in aggregate demand while potential aggregate supply has been rising because of overinvestment by China and other emerging markets will sharply reduce inflation. Slack labor markets with rising unemployment rates will cap wage and labor costs.

Further falls in commodity prices — already down 30 percent from their summer peak — will add to these deflationary pressures.

Policymakers will have to worry about a strange beast called “stag-deflation” (a combination of economic stagnation, recession and deflation); about liquidity traps (when official interest rates become so close to zero that traditional monetary policy loses effectiveness); and about debt deflation (the rise in the real value of nominal debts, increasing the risk of bankruptcy for distressed households, firms, financial institutions and governments).

With traditional monetary policy becoming less effective, non-traditional policy tools aimed at generating greater liquidity and credit (via quantitative easing and direct central bank purchases of private illiquid assets) will become necessary. And while traditional fiscal policy (government spending and tax cuts) will be pursued aggressively, non-traditional fiscal policy (expenditures to bail out financial institutions, lenders and borrowers) will also become increasingly important.

In the process, the role of states and governments in economic activity will be vastly expanded.

Traditionally, central banks have been the lenders of last resort, but now they are becoming the lenders of first and only resort. As banks curtail lending to each other, to other financial institutions and to the corporate sector, central banks are becoming the only lenders around.

Likewise, with household consumption and business investment collapsing, governments will soon become the spenders of first and only resort, stimulating demand and rescuing banks, firms and households.

The long-term consequences of the resulting surge in fiscal deficits are serious. If the deficits are monetized by central banks, inflation will follow the short-term deflationary pressures; if they are financed by debt, the long-term solvency of some governments may be at stake unless medium-term fiscal discipline is restored.

Nevertheless, in the short run, very aggressive monetary and fiscal policy actions — both traditional and non-traditional — must be undertaken to ensure that the inevitable stag-deflation of next year does not persist into 2010 and beyond.

So far, the US response appears to be more aggressive than that of the euro zone as the European Central Bank falls behind the curve on interest rates and the EU’s fiscal stance remains weak.

Given the severity of this economic and financial crisis, financial markets will not mend for a while. The downside risks to the prices of a wide variety of risky assets (equities, corporate bonds, commodities, housing and emerging-market asset classes) will remain until there are true signs — toward the end of next year — that the global economy may recover in 2010.

Nouriel Roubini is professor of economics at the Stern School of Business, New York University, and chairman of RGE Monitor, an economic consultancy.

COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE

Afternoon Update following the FOMC Statement:

The Fed decision to cut the target for the Fed Funds rate to a 0% to 0.25% range is just underwriting what was already obvious and happening in reality: while the target Fed Funds was – until yesterday – still1% in the last few weeks – following the massive increase in liquidity by the Fed – the actual Fed Funds was already trading at a level literally close to 0%. So today the Fed formalized what was already happening for weeks now, i.e. that the Fed Funds rate was already zero and that the Fed had already moved to quantitative and qualitative easing in the form of massive increase in the monetary base and aggressive use of monetary policy – via a range of new facilities and tools – to reduce short term and long term market rates that are stubbornly high in a sign that the credit crunch is severe and worsening. I predicted early in 2008 that the Fed Funds rate “would be closer to 0% than to 1%” in the midst of a severe recession. Now 12 months into this severe recession (that officially started in December 2007) – a recession that will last at least another 12 months (if not more) – the Fed Funds rate is already down to 0% (the beginning of the zero-interest-rate-policy or ZIRP for the US) and the Fed has moved into uncharted unorthodox monetary policy as a severe stag-deflation is taking place. And as predicted in this forum over a month ago the Fed is now committed to keep the Fed Funds rate close to zero for a long time and even considering purchasing long-term Treasuries as a way to push lower long term government bond yields that are already falling sharply.

280 Responses to “Latest Project Syndicate Column: Has Global Stag-Deflation Arrived? …and comment on the Fed ZIRP decision”

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 10:11 am

It seems as though there is one common theme that summarizes US politics and the US stock markets right now: Dishonesty.PeteCA

CaponeDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:23 am

all i want for Christmas in US is cheap gas, low mortgage rates and higher stock prices…thanks Santa Claus! i mean free global markets, i mean… awe forget it…

FAMCDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:34 am

Roubini most important statement:”The long-term consequences of the resulting surge in fiscal deficits are serious. If the deficits are monetized by central banks, inflation will follow the short-term deflationary pressures; if they are financed by debt, the long-term solvency of some governments may be at stake unless medium-term fiscal discipline is restored.”How to control this mess?PeteCA, Remember our discussion about control systems and Pilot Induced Oscillations?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:38 am

@Guest on previous thread: “In his book, “Rogue State: A Guide to the World’s Only Superpower,” William Blum (if you’re not reading Bill at killinghope.org, you’re missing out on hidden history) warns of how the media will make anything that smacks of “conspiracy theory” an immediate “object of ridicule.” This prevents the media from ever having to investigate the many strange interconnections among the ruling class—for example, the relationship between the interlocking boards of directors of media giants, and the energy, banking and defense industries. These unmentionable topics are usually treated with what Blum calls “the media’s most effective tool—silence.” But in case somebody’s asking questions, all you have to do is say, “conspiracy theory,” and any allegation instantly becomes too frivolous to merit serious attention.Whenever I hear the words “conspiracy theory” it usually means someone is getting too close to the truth…”There it is: how easy it is to corral the sheeple — swayed so easily by the slogans and banners of the state, so fooled as to what these slogans and demonizations by the State media, such as “conspiracy nut,” do to human beings. While the vast majority of sheeple succumb to the state line, what happens to the few men and women, the defiant ones, left to struggle for existence and freedom behind those slogans and banners?The Bolsheviks’ slogan before the Bolshevik coup d’etat that destroyed the Provisional Government existing from March to November 1917 in Russia after the overthrow of Tsarism, was “Down with capital punishment, reinstated by Kerensky.” And, so, a new era of executions and starvation and death camps under Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin was inaugurated and 65 million people perished. And, as the Revolution hastened to rename everything so all would be “new,” the death penalty was rechristened “the supreme measure” — no longer a ‘punishment” but a means of “social defense.”Thus, the kernel of truth behind the Bolshevik slogan was birthed when the Provisional Government, that had abolished capital punishment entirely, reinstated it in July for military crimes, murder, rape, assault and pillage ~ and in so doing, created easy slogan fodder for the sheeple.

DocBergDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:38 am

So, if we have deflation, what little money I happen to possess will become more valuable. Where is the problem in this?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:42 am

FAR more unfair than people are aware:http://www.michaelparenti.org/Superrich.htmlHighlights of this very short article:The super rich, the less than 1 percent of the population who own the lion’s share of the nation’s wealth, go uncounted in most income distribution reports.All such reports about income distribution are based on U.S. Census Bureau surveys that regularly leave Big Money out of the picture. A few phone calls to the Census Bureau in Washington D.C. revealed that for years the bureau never interviewed anyone who had an income higher than $300,000. Or if interviewed, they were never recorded as above the “reportable upper limit” of $300,000, the top figure allowed by the bureau’s computer program.Media publicity that focuses exclusively on a handful of greedy top executives conveniently avoids any exposure of the super rich as a class.Indeed, most of the really big money is inherited — and by a portion of the population that is so minuscule as to be judged statistically inaccessible.That top 0.25 owns more wealth than the other 99 percent combined.For years now, as the wealth of the few has been growing, the number of poor has been increasing at a faster rate than the earth’s population.The rest is at the linkSee also:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woIkIph5xcU

FAMCDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:52 am

They want you to pay more for cars, food, etc, etc,That is, they do not want you to buy bargains but help business to reflate their prices to support misinvestments and people that work for them. And to facilitate the debt payment with weaker dollars.Also, they want to stop the “wait to buy” psycology.

AnonymousDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:52 am

and flood the labor market with workers for less pay. I am left in the cold. A tradesman with no trade left.

KerwinDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:02 am

What sorts of depression economics should we expect to come out of this crisis? President-elect Obama has already pledged massive infrastructural development (like done with the highways in the 50′s) and another major stimulus package. What sorts of non-traditional fiscal policy do you see being enacted?It seems that in the process of clogging the leak we have actually caused a clot to develop. And this clot is now another problem to address. In addition at other points we have little (or not so little) bursts of soars (i.e. B Madoff ponze schemes and the loss of further billions and their ripple effects of lost cash and cash availability). All this already in the making and we have not really come up with a solution yet… neither have we began to talk about the regulation to ‘safe guard’ against future occurrences.At times it seems that those responsible are still just trying to come out ahead (only acting in their favour) rather than really working to deal with this problem. Those we should allow to go as they pose a threat both to the current system and the future sustainability of a well functioning one.At the end of this do we expect things to return to the status quo, or should we expect a major shift in the consciousness and integrity of financial institutions and players?

MADecember 16th, 2008 at 11:12 am

I’m still having a massive problem getting over the fact that when the Fed/SEC/etc… had questions… It was common for them to tap Madoff for answers. (especially on things like stopping ponzi’s)Is it all fiction?Miss America

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:17 am

Deflation will cause in bankrupcies of so many companies, which will reduce price competitiveness, which in turn will cause inflation even without monetization. With additional monetiztion, hyperinflation is a sure thing that will destroy the States.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:17 am

Where does integrity come from? I would suggest it going to have to come from a shift in our ideals and values as a society. Madoff and Wall street are a microcosm or a reflection of a society as a whole that has lost its way by placing too much value on possessions. I suggest the answer to the fraud problems we face is actually a very personal one, by changing what’s of value to yourself is how you can make the biggest difference.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:22 am

Could you add some heat: I’m freezing to death in this office trying to hold down my heating bill. Or, if not, how about some of those mittens with the fingers out?

SigmundDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:23 am

According to Dr. Roubini, we are on the brink of a deflationary spiral that with falling demand, excessive inventory, stagnant wages and rising unemployment is highly likely to take us over the edge into full fledged deflation. In addition, Dr. Roubini says that we are getting close to being snared by a liquidity trap where Fed policy rates are near zero and further action becomes ineffective in stimulating the economy. And, then there is the horror of “debt deflation” where the burden of debt on the debtor actually increases, making it that much more difficult to make economic progress.Dr. Roubini, for all his pessimism regarding the current direction of the economy seems oddly optimistic about the ability of central banks and governments across the globe to pull a rabbit out of the hat. He seems to believe that most countries, including the US will be on the road to recovery by 2010. He seems to believe that the same folks who got us into this mess are capable of quickly getting us out. This doesn’t quite add up in my mind. Here’s my question: Given what is currently happening in the US and globally, what is the probability of significant economic recovery in the US by 2010?

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:30 am

FAMC,Its worse than that. Because we are running up the deficits right now and none of it is going to actually stimulate anything. It’a all going to just cover the gigantic excesses and looming defaults of the overlarge and increasingly irrelevant financial industry. Consider:- The Fed has an alphabet soup of programs designed to make themselves the lender of first reaort. This will only continue and get bigger.- US debt is the safe haven of those currently in cash. Therefore the US is the world’s bank- Meanwhile, we are handing out the bailout money to banks, insurers, all kinds of financial institutions. Soon we will be trying to bail out losers in hedge funds.Our deficits increase for the sole means of protecting those who caused the mess from suffering its consequences. There is no insistence upon transparency, no forcing of the realization of losses, no shutdown of zombie entities.So in the end, the unstable control system effects (likened to a pilot induced oscillation, or PIO, look it up) will be felt in a cycle of hyperinflation, and we will have gotten nothing for our deficits and ‘crazy’ actions that caused it. Roubini is too optimistic.How to control the mess? – first quit feeding the control inputs in the wrong direction – the financial industry.ex VRWC

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:39 am

The unaware are unaware that they are unaware.How many people are aware, versus how many unaware of the fact that the whole course of human history after world war one was changed by the censorship of one post-war interview the amazing George Seldes (America’s most important forgotten journalist) conducted with Field Marshall Von Hindenburg?Suppression of that report helped enable the Nazis (and their industrialist and banking backers in USA and Britain!) hoodwink the public into world war two.Now there’s some hidden his-story to look up!

Little SaverDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:44 am

Really real, like the latest US president getting shoes thrown at his head and everybody except bribed leaders sympathetic towards the journalist making there probably one of the best statements ever made.Shoes finally beating cruise missiles, weapons of mass ego destruction finally uncovered.Welcome to reality with banks stealing money and ordinary citizens encouraged to borrow themselves into bankrupcy.Que encore?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:50 am

Sigmund, it seems that focus on your question is more on the time frame applied to the recovery rather than the entity initiating the solution to the problem.Though I don’t speak for Dr. Roubini, it seems, from his other writings, he expects the bottoming out of the housing bubble (which should fall by another 20%) to come in a period where combined with the monetary policy (already at it’s end of zero percent interest) and fiscal policy (which will come soon by the infrastructural development spending and stimulus packages – of just the US alone) combined with those of the ECB, will mean that all that can be done to address the problem would have been. All this I assume he sees being realized in the coming year. And we have already seen major ‘efforts’ by those entities (Central Banks and Governments) acting to lessen the effect of what’s happening as well as trying to provide that stimulus to growth.Have we hit that bottom yet? No! But from that point onwards it would be a road to recovery.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:58 am

While shopping in our local Wal-Mart this past Sunday I noticed signs in different places in the store in front of empty shelves that stated; due to problems with our suppliers we are out of this product, please ask store associate for other options. (Not the exact wording but close.) These signs were in both the stores I went into this weekend. Signs of suppliers not able to raise capital for production, or not willing to produce the goods for deflated pricing?

ptmDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:58 am

Yup.And you are on the inside MA, you are one of the believers.I’m thinking the Madoff affair will have long term consequences. By betraying trust, he trashed Wall Street’s most valuable commodity. Not only will this affair weaken the dollar, but the future of financial industry as well.I’m but a floating mot in the economic milieu, but I’m guessing there is a lot of other mots thinking the same thing. It will be a long time to come before any trust redevelops.

KerwinDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:59 am

I agree by adjusting our values would contribute to avoiding fraud problems. But we don’t all share the same values – partly the results of our situations in life. We all have different levels of responsibilities and obligations.But an address of the overall value-base of the system should be examined. Right now corporations operate under the objective of maximizing investor returns, or at least appearing to in the case of Madoff. Such value-base is a major contributor to the fraud that has perpetrated the system, weakened or eroded it’s integrity, and threatens an entire global economy.Madoff and WallStreet are microcosms, like you said, but I think they represent a very small, albeit powerful and with superior presence, than society on a whole. We should have a more ecological approach to both finance and economics. Selfish profiteers of now are endangering the entire system and the future for those who came after.So you’re correct – a more value based system is what we need…but with different, more ecological, values.

aerial viewDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:05 pm

Agree! Most of the govt statistics significantly underestimate true values: inflation, employment, etc. We must have transparency and honest assessment of data and policies for any hope of positive change.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Interesting. What kind of items? I have hear or seen this in the deep south. Where are you seeing it?There is one odd thing in my local Wal-Mart. No inexpensive 30 gal trash bags for the last two months? Plenty of larger string bags, lawn bags, and sandwich bags though.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

In response to a question about the Fed lowering FFR to .5% Obama replied in a press conference this am, it would be imprudent for the Prez. elect to second guess the Fed–they are an independent agency.Isn’t this the crux of the problem we face? Isn’t it time we nationalized the Fed and stopped the madness? Sadly, by the time Obama figures it out, it will be too late.

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

The financial industry is already dead. Its future is baked in the cake.Trust – this evaporated a while back. Madoff is only confirmation of the moral and financial bankruptcy at the heart of the system The only trust left is in bailouts now. The only optimism in a herd mentality of following the latest hoped for government tossout or speculation of a rate cut or easing.We have so far to fall.

ptmDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

Inflation/deflation is a macroeconomic trend primarily resulting from monetary policy.Price decreases in a specific item or class of items like cell phones, or DNA sequencing, is call increased productivity.Price increases in a specific item or class of items called and asset bubble.So gasoline was an asset bubble, but now it’s increased productivity ;-)

aerial viewDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

Yep, and one of the strongest levers the public has is to shut off the oxygen to these all consuming corporate monsters by closing our wallet. I and many others will not deposit our money, obtain mortgages or conduct any business with BAC, Citi, etc. They cannot operate (very long) without our money! The other choice is to wait (for eternity) for our govt to do something!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:22 pm

“Have we hit that bottom yet? No! But from that point onwards it would be a road to recovery. “With the current system still in place there will be no recovery even when we bottom. With $60 trill in debt and a tsunami of baby boomers retiring and getting old with little savings, a vast wasteland of a hollowed out America lays at our doorstep for a generation. And the elites who created this disaster will abandon the carcass and move to greener pastures. This will be far worse than the Great Depression IMO.

OuterBeltwayDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

BrainTrust: More on the “what’s the problem” front. From Brad Setser’s blog, which centers on central bank (currency, trade flow) policy:

# December 16th, 2008 at 2:39 am Ying responds:Mercantilism and consumerism go arm in arm as twins. The separation between consumers and producers make people hard to understand the other side of the story. The dimension of distance is not only a geographic one, but also a mental distance. It creates an understanding gap – a gap of information, awareness and responsibility towards each other. Most US consumers are completely ignorant about the devastating environmental impact towards other people, other land on other side of the planet caused by innocent indulgence in consumption. Most Chinese producers have no ideas that they took American manufacturing jobs away from American workers. In reality, pension funds in the US funded multinational firms which in turn made heavy investment in China and other developing nations. Ask how much GM invested in China. If any American wants to blame anyone or country for the crisis, he or she should really look at its own system and fix it. It’s not Mercantilist country that destroyed the United States. It’s the systemic policy choices the United States made in the last decades that leads to the current financial crisis.

I find this post fascinating because the people most hurt by our current trade and industrial policy are the ones that made it happen.Few of us understood the consequences of these actions (foreign investment) – either at the time they occurred, or the present time, when the consequences are becoming more apparent. You may argue that ‘rich people shipped jobs overseas’, but ‘rich people’ are having their portfolios hammered right now.They didn’t really understand the phenomenon, either.What does that tell you?Here’s the link to Brad Setser’s blog, so you can see the full context of the posting.

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

an interesting article posted a few weeks ago on your very question:Waging war against deflation could have nasty consequencesHARRY KOZA November 21, 2008

The U.S. consumer price index fell 1 per cent in October, its biggest drop since they started keeping records back in 1947. That’s raised the ugly spectre of deflation, which naturally scares the hell out of the markets, the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and anyone else with too much debt, like U.S. consumers.Personally, if you’ll indulge me while I talk my position here, I’m all for a healthy dose of deflation. I have no mortgage and no other debt, got mostly out of stocks a year ago and into cash, so I could make out like a bandit in a deflationary environment. Bring it on, I say.Of course, deflation is a real worry when you have an economy that is based on the Orwellian concept, “debt is wealth.” I don’t get the concept, myself. Read more

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:32 pm

A road to recovery based on what?What do you think the basis of the US economy going forward should be? It has been:- Dot com bubble- Housing bubbleAll of this overlaid by a financial industry bubble, feeding a credit bubble upon which US collective spending rested for years and years. All of this also resulting in a trade and wage imbalance.Will all of bubbles now these burst and the imbalances correcting, I don’t see where a recovery comes from. We cannot go back to the status quo, it no longer exists. I don’t think just trusting in cyclical forces will do it, there has to be some basis.Sorry, I think this is much longer term correction. a 2010 recovery seems awfully optimistic.

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:40 pm

Most US consumers are completely ignorant about the devastating environmental impact towards other people, other land on other side of the planet caused by innocent indulgence in consumption.Bingo, bingo, bingo. Setser is so right on. If you could all have accompanied me to China, you would have this driven home to you, oh so clearly.Our consumption and capital hot money inflows have to them been the equivalent of a silver strike in an old mining town. That is what China is, a boom town based on the silver strike of US consumption. A big, environmentally disastrous, hypercapitalistic boom town. Where the vein just played out.ex VRWC

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:42 pm

Many, many months ago on this blog I seem to recall a discussion of the fact that when interest rates got very low, a cut of even a quarter point had a massive stimulatory effect, much out of proportion to the size of the cut. Does anyone remember that discussion or can anyone expand on this idea?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 12:43 pm

@Kerwin: “At the end of this do we expect things to return to the status quo, or should we expect a major shift in the consciousness and integrity of financial institutions and players?This sole superpower is headed toward a battle in its downward spiral between the people who want to rule and the other people who don’t want to be ruled. The battle is centered in New York and London. But the ruler wannabes don’t have the conditions of the 18th century whereby they could kill people.The United States, as we know it, is coming to an end. As the current financial system crashes and burns, the new financial system in the future won’t have dictatorial government power. The people won’t have it.The criminals are conducting a daylight robbery. That means they won’t have a place to go with their stolen goods and power because all the world is watching and opposed.I’m one of the few people who believe as I do, that reads Krugman. I do so to see what the opposition is saying. His article today says that the European Union economy is just as bad as the U.S.’s, but that the largest economy within Europe is resisting the Keynesian “cure”. That country, Germany, doesn’t want to suffer Keynes and end up like the rest, with its currency and economy wiped out. Merkel and the Germans, who went through the “cure” in the 1920s, simply are saying “no” to the billion dollar “stimulus packages” and the trillion dollar bailouts.The financial system that everyone is trying to “save,” is going to crash. The economy itself is sound, but badly needs a course correction. Liken the nation’s situation to a little town with one bank and the banker is stealing all the money. Eventually, the bank gets disposed of and the little town starts again to rebuild itself.The country’s financial system is a global Ponzi scheme of taking money from one and giving it to another –- protected against default by the American workingman. That “system” is now on its last hurdle, in the last canyon. Some rich people will get away, yes, but the financial “system” itself won’t get away. The story will have a different ending. Why? Because this is not just another boom and bust economic cycle: it involves foreign systems and massive corruption and the world sees it.But, you say, the economy is still running, isn’t it? Yes, but that is simply testimony of how strong the economy was before. You can run a car that runs out of oil for a short while, but it is going to stop.This is the end chapter

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 1:08 pm

This logic depended on the Fed funds rate being the real operating rate. In practice, the effective Fed funds rate is currently already zero. What happens today with Fed rates is probably irrelevant. Bernanke may do other things, but rates don’t do much in his toolbox right now. Just my opinion. Be careful of the market – they may just be sucking people in … so they can sell on the news.PeteCA

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:09 pm

December 16, 2008 at 3:30 AM EST globeand mailOTTAWA — Stephen Harper has delivered his bleakest forecast yet for the Canadian economy, warning yesterday the future is increasingly hard to read and conceding the possibility of a depression.”The truth is, I’ve never seen such uncertainty in terms of looking forward to the future,” the Prime Minister told CTV News in Halifax.”I’m very worried about the Canadian economy.”The definition of a depression is less established, but is considered to be a prolonged recession where output declines by more than 10 per cent.

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 1:15 pm

The US dollar has now clearly broken out of the recent uptrend. For millions of foreign investors this now raises a critical question: Should they stay in US T-Bills … or not? With T-Bills earning zero interest, and the dollar going down, how much are people prepared to pay for “safety” ???We’ll find out.PeteCA

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

Looking up your reference to Seldes, I found this reference on Google to a post from “Mom” on RGE Monitor this past September 24. Here is the basis of it:May I recommend you get your hands on The George Seldes Reader, Dear Americans, and get up to speed easily with the nasty history of fascism in this country…To this day I am the only person I know who has ever read about this: In 1918, Seldes interviewed Field Marshall Von Hindenburg (the supreme commander of the German forces). This report could have changed the world’s views about Germany prior to World War II and thus may have changed the course of history had the Allies not censored it.How come all the opprobrium falls on Hitler, and not on the complicit American and British (amongst others) Banksters and businessmen who funded his rise to power? Do Americans remember that Hitler was TIME magazine’s man of the year back in Presscot’s day??Also, get thee to William Blum’s website Killing Hope. Read Killing Hope, sign up for Bill’s monthly anti-empire reports….What we don’t know can’t hurt THEM. And by THEM I mean billionaires, period. The kind that come in all stripes and flavors and shades. No one self-earns a billion. Billionaires are simply in possession of other-earned wealth, and the result of that is they have to live on a very unhappy planet now wired to blow.What America’s working people don’t know, cannot hurt the wealthpower giants nor the billionaire wannabees nor those eager or willing to carry their damn water for them…i could spit nails or die laughing at this species some days, honestly. the damn foxes who plunder the henhouse are the ones who get on teevee and say they’ll fixz it up in a jif. that’s how the plan works, which you know once you learn to see the patterns. they create the problem they come up with the solution to resolve it for you with. you get the shaft coming and going, the money keeps funneling to one point of concentration: those who have all the money…”http://www.rgemonitor.com/roubini-monitor/253713/the_unraveling_of_the_shadow_banking_system_moves_to_hedge_funds_as_schmalpha_replaces_alpha

David in SeattleDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:27 pm

Why is Goldman stock rallying 11% despite larger than expected loss? Am I missing something?Oh, they are buying back their own shares with the 10 billion in tax payer money. Never mind then…

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:30 pm

Market Events14:25 ET Dow +122.26 at 8686.79, Nasdaq +34.92 at 1543.26, S&P +15.80 at 884.37: [BRIEFING.COM] Stocks are spiking after the FOMC slashed interest rates more than expected.The Federal Open Market Committee cut the fed funds target rate to 0.25% from 1.00%, which is a deeper cut than the 50 basis point cut that economists were expecting.The discount rate was also cut. It now stands at 0.50%, down from 1.25%.

CMDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

How this is bullish for stocks is beyound me! The Fed basically admitted they are in the deflationary fight of their lives! Not only that, they said thing have worsened from an economic standpoint, thus, the street still expecting 15% earnings growht for 2009 is a fucking fairytale! Becareful here, the scam is in full force!

David in SeattleDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Investors in US assets will keep doing this until they get burnt. I give you exhibit A: Bernard Madoff.Humans have a way of learning only from tragedy.By they way, Pete… You might enjoy watching documentaries about the great African migration. It amazes me how investors behave just like the Wildebeests at the river. They sense that there is danger, but after the first few jump in, the whole herd follows in. The lions and the crocodiles will have a feast (just like the crooks in our world). Amazingly, the wildebeests hardly remember what had happened earlier and jump in again and again after a few minutes. Sounds familiar?? I thought so.

OuterBeltwayDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Guest:I hope you stick around to help the BrainTrust people pick through the rubble and devise a “new” economy. You have done a great job of describing what has happened to date.I hope you’ll consider doing just as good a job re-assembling the broken pieces into tomorrow’s economy for the American Workingman – more appropriately, maybe, for the World’s Workingman.

ptmDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

JOHN WILLIAMS’ SHADOW GOVERNMENT STATISTICS – FLASH UPDATE – December 16, 2008 – Annual Gimmicked CPI Slowed to 1.1% (9.3% for BLS 1980 method) in November – November Real Retail Sales Down 8.3% Year-to-Year – Production Falling at 10% Annualized Quarterly Pace

With a global recession a near certainty, deflation — rather than inflation — will become the main concern for policymakers. The fall in aggregate demand while potential aggregate supply has been rising because of overinvestment by China and other emerging markets will sharply reduce inflation. Slack labor markets with rising unemployment rates will cap wage and labor costs.Further falls in commodity prices — already down 30 percent from their summer peak — will add to these deflationary pressures.Well, well, NR thinks to himself, I told you so.Maybe so NR, maybe so. But BLS 1980 method still says 9.3% inflation, So I will wait a little longer and watch the dollar. My guess is that this economic balloon is ready to pop rather than slowly deflate.

OuterBeltwayDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:41 pm

Setser didn’t make that comment, ex VRWC. It was made by one of his blog’s posters, whose name is Ying.If you ever have a free moment, would you please post a story or two about what it’s really like in China? Where did you go, what did you see, how does it compare with the U.S., and what’s the likely next steps for China as demand from the U.S. dries up.Why can’t China “de-couple” and point production toward its own people? I still don’t understand why that can’t happen. Can/will you shed light on that?Doesn’t that absolutely, positively have to be China’s next step forward? Is there another consumer economy anywhere that can absorb China’s production?TIA.

aerial viewDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:44 pm

The FED or “Fraternity of Economic Dumbells” has done it again: creating a financial black hole that the equity market vacuum will first suck up all of the Bears money before they take even more of the Bulls! It’s just a matter of time!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

“We live in a world of euphemism. Undertakers have become ‘morticians,’ press agents are now ‘public relations counselors’ and janitors have all been transformed into ‘superintendents.’ In every walk of life, plain facts have been wrapped in cloudy camouflage.“No less has this been true of economics. In the old days, we used to suffer nearly periodic economic crises, the sudden onset of which was called a ‘panic,’ and the lingering trough period after the panic was called ‘depression.’“The most famous depression in modern times, of course, was the one that began in a typical financial panic in 1929 and lasted until the advent of World War II. After the disaster of 1929, economists and politicians resolved that this must never happen again. The easiest way of succeeding at this resolve was, simply to define ‘depressions’ out of existence. From that point on, America was to suffer no further depression. For when the next sharp depression came along, in 1937-38, the economists simply refused to use the dread name, and came up with a new, much softer-sounding word: ‘recession.’ From that point on, we have been through quite a few recessions, but not a single depression.” | Dr. Murray Rothbard, “Economic Depressions: Causes & Cures.” 1969

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:03 pm

Why do equity markets react so positively to the FED cut? The Fed statement was clear about the direction to hell for the economy, meaning that future corporate earnings will sink to record low levels and consequenly the current value of most equities is overestimated because it doesn’t take into account those futures losses or negative growth assets… I understand the theory that says that stocks go up when rates are cut (DDM model Div./Rate) but the present case growth will be negative, dividends inexistant, etc… so there is no rational behind any increase in equities today for me. And even if US Treasuries only earn between 0% (3m) and 2.9% (30y) it is still far better than the negative return of equities (inexistant div. + negative capital gain) so once again I don’t understand the rush in equities today. Could anybody help me understand investors’ mind?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:03 pm

Yeah!! Here is some really market-friendly news! Stocks should go up 500 points now!!!!! WAHHHOOOOOO, jump on board the retard train!!!!2:59 p.m.[GE] GE to eliminate further quarterly EPS guidance

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:10 pm

3:07 p.m.[MS] Morgan Stanley shares jump 17%, to $15.983:05 p.m.[XLF] Financial Select Sector ETF rises 7.3%

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — Treasuries rose, pushing yields to record lows, after the Federal Reserve cut the main U.S. interest rate to a range of zero to 0.25 percent and said central bankers will do whatever is necessary to ease the longest recession in a quarter-century.“The tone of the statement is consistent with an economy in one of the deepest downturns in the 20th century,” said Jane Caron, chief economic strategist in Burlington, Vermont, at Dwight Asset Management Co., which oversees $70 billion. “There is a dire tone in this statement.”http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601009&sid=acJaAVRY9cJ0&refer=bondApparently we have begun to time travel. We need Einstein to return from the dead to tell us where in the space-time continuum Bernanke has taken us.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:12 pm

YEAHHH!!!! THis is worth a 15% move to the upside!!!!! YEAHHHH!!3:08 p.m.Goldman Sachs’ red ink tops $2 billion in first quarterly loss

CMDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:14 pm

Get your dow 10,000 caps ready cause the red phone says their is some more sheeple rapin to do before they slam this to new lows!!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:15 pm

God help us all“The Fed is sending a message that it will print money to an unlimited extent until it starts to see the economy expanding,” William Poole, former president of the St. Louis Fed and now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. Poole is also a contributor to Bloomberg News.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:17 pm

Dec. 16 (Bloomberg) — The dollar fell to a two-month low against the euro as the Federal Reserve cut the target lending rate to a range of zero to 0.25 percent, making the greenback the lowest-yielding currency among industrialized nations.The U.S. dollar dropped for a fifth day versus the euro, the longest stretch of losses since February, as the central bank said in its statement that it will do whatever is needed to ease the recession. European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet said yesterday there’s a limit to how far the bank can cut interest rates and signaled it may pause in January.“Sell dollars,” said Scott Ainsbury, a portfolio manager who helps manage $14.6 billion in currencies at New York-based hedge fund FX Concepts Inc. “We have a zero interest-rate policy. It didn’t do very well for Japan over the years, did it?”

dvige4December 16th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

ever heard of Catherine Austin Fitts? if not, discover her now:www.solari.comand especially her blog:www.solari.com/blogbetween her and NR, I’m VERY WELL informed, and informed is forewarned, and forewarned is forearmed!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

Also sinking deeper and deeper into that financial black hole where no bottom splash can be heard are: savings/pension/wage values destroyed by price inflation particularly for food, gas, health insurance and non-competitive monopolies; normal house appreciation once tagged somewhat to inflation; taxpayers forced to support a broadened base of delinquent homeowners, a growing bureaucracy, first-time home buyers, F&F subsidized mortgages, the jobless because of manufacturing base destruction and lower-wage replacements, and the passed-on cost of programs for low-income immigrant and illegal immigrants– health care, utililties and property tax subsidies, food, housing, child care, schools, transferred tax cash for number of children, police, and prison systems.All this, for the survival of the investment bankers and…financial power.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

Well Prof. Roubini, didn’t you also say “the Dollar will fall” and “Gold will fall as deflation sets in”? You were right with the Dollar but very wrong with Gold! Unfortunately you don’t comment on Gold anymore…

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:34 pm

Thanks for correcting that – I missed it.I linked this a couple of times already, I hope it is not getting old. It is a blog I did about my trip: A Dragon on WInter’s Eve You asked:Why can’t China “de-couple” and point production toward its own people? I still don’t understand why that can’t happen. Can/will you shed light on that? You are correct, they have to turn inward now to pick up the slack. I don’t know that any consumer economy can pick up their overcapacity. This is their planned next step, however it is not as simple as that. There is a wide gulf between the poor and the emerging middle class, between the farmer and the city dweller, between the burgeoning regions and the backwaters. To increase consumption of the poor, however, requires some kind of infrastructure, some kind of modernization. A society has to grow into modernization, you cannot jump start it in just a few years. But the results of modernization in China have, in ways, been devastating already. I tried to touch on this a little in the blog, I can write more.

RichDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:38 pm

Brilliant Rocket AnalogyN.R. tells the truth that there is no easy way out of this, we teeter on the edge of hyper deflation and or hyper inflation. Kind of like an out of control rocket loaded with extra boosters and fuel and we’re not exactly sure which way the rocket will go- will it go up or down? One thing we can all agree on though is that the odds of a crash or explosion are quite high.

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:47 pm

Fed cuts to 0. 350+ gain on the Dow. Dollar-Yen at 89 now. Oil-Dollar inverse relationship broken. Even the lowly pound is creaming the dollar. Can’t they see what they are doing? Another line of cocaine, another short lived high, a bigger crash on the horizon.

JimmyTheBankerDecember 16th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

Once again, with infaltion and interest rates falling faster than earnings revisions, stock earnings streams become more valuable. In my estimation, using data through today, and using bullshit estimates from wall street, the S&P is worth 1060 today, 16% above where we are today. Now, we can rally until rates and inflation level out or until earnings estimates plummit. Using no growth for the S&P earnings for 2009, fair value drops to 762. The momentum will continue until a great force says no more…

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm

including $100k of mine – i would be happy to provide him with a break – a leg, an arm, at least a nose.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:02 pm

:00 p.m.Fed official says econ. outlook similar to private sector4:00 p.m.Fed sees economic weakness in Q4 and Q1: officialLies! Damn Lies!!4:00 p.m.Fed sees slow recovery after mid-year 2009: official4:00 p.m.Fed policy to lower credit spreads in debt markets: official4:00 p.m.Deflation is not major threat, Fed official says4:00 p.m.Fed action not same as Japan quantitative easing: official4:00 p.m.Fed not trying to target mortgage rates: official

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

So PeteCA – you were on the money so to speak with your call on the dollarand to all of the other wise folks out there – if you are 100% cash what does one do?

CaponeDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:09 pm

it is generous of the oil exporters to accept less dollars that are depreciating in value and infinite in “supply” that are created out of thin air for their finite natural resources… the US deserves it that way apparently! for TODAY anyways…

OuterBeltwayDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:10 pm

ex VRWC:Thanks very much for that link. I immensely enjoyed reading your work. I’ve not seen much on that topic, by one of your background. Outstanding read.2nd tier question. I refer to these two passages in your piece:

As I reflect on China, what occurs to me is that China needs, most of all, to develop a modern, sustainable, localized community structure. Development focused on moving the population out of the vast urban centers and into smaller, green communities would seem to be a good way forward. As I contemplate this, I cannot escape the thought that the current needs of China are ten years too early for the technology required to build such sustainable infrastructure. Needing to move quickly, China may be forced to stay its course. As in other aspects of the global crisis, the timing is terrible.

And then, in the context of whether the China will be able to adapt to changing conditions as quickly as the U.S.:

For it occurs to me that, to effectively apply government stimulus, and to grow domestic demand and raise up local communities, local focus will be required. In democratic America, this happens through the workings of democracy at every level of government, answerable to the people it serves. Govrenment flexes, innovates and adjusts to meet local needs. It is not clear that the Chinese way will provide what is needed, for China has not grown up in a democratic tradition and its experiment with capitalism is facing its most severe test yet.

I’m not as confident as you are that the U.S. government, at any level, really understands where and how to apply resources to re-start demand. What I see so far ($700B to IBanks) is horrendous, and I see nothing of great imagination or efficacy proposed at any level – national, state or local. Can you cite any examples?In a way, China’s problem is much simpler than ours. They have millions of farmers to equip with simple tools. Our farmers have the best equipment in the world. Every part of our economy has virtually the best (if you use fossil fuels) and most efficient gear in existence.We have a horrendous over-supply problem – the same one we faced at the outset of the first depression, and we don’t really understand how to balance over-supply with high incomes.The Chinese have a much simpler job to do: re-tool their factories toward increasing domestic productivity in several key economic sectors: energy, transportation, housing, agriculture, and education. I’m not sure if the cultural constraints they face are any more daunting than the ones we face.Given what you’ve seen of the China problem (very well-framed), can you put forth a similar definition of what the American economy must do to adapt?Additional productivity may actually not be the answer; we don’t need more productivity, as the labor component of our production is already too low to support high labor rates – there’s not enough demand for labor, hence all the make-work and “services”.And the services don’t add any value. They’re dead-weight.I think we have a more severe problem than China.What is your perspective?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:11 pm

This also lends to the stock rally, stocks usually bottom 6 months before the end of a recesssion.WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) A senior Federal Reserve official said Tuesday that economists at the central bank basically agree with Wall Street economists about the depth and duration of the recession. The official said that growth would be weak over the final three months of this year and into next year, with a slow recovery starting after mid-year. Deflation is not a major concern for the central bank, the official said. The Fed has changed tactics of its monetary policy to target specific debt markets with wide spreads, the official said. Programs already announced can be expanded and new programs may be forthcoming, the official said. It may be possible to expand the purchase of debt below the AAA rating with the cooperation of Treasury. Such programs may have to await the next administration, the official said.

KDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

You’ve mentioned two very recent bubbles in the long history of this system and I hardly think that two bubbles can be the defining factor of the US economy.Going forward I think we would use methods that have been successful in the past in bringing us back to equilibrium. How long? Who knows for sure? But it certainly is going to take a while considering the depth of the hole that we are in debt wise. The hard work and ingenuity of the people of this country is what will ensure this system keeps chugging alone. Applying principles from Keynesian economics would be a good way to begin.I am not sure what the federal debt is as a percentage of GDP is today but I’m sure it’s at levels of 1940′s. A road to recover would be a road to the reduction of the federal debt as a percentage of GDP and a gradually increasing GDP. During the Great Depression the Federal Debt was 44% of GDP and it dropped to about 33% … long before any of your noted bubbles. Point being that in tough times we do find out way back to semblances of normalcy and growth.GD of what P? Well, that remains to be seen. Our industries have always proven strong. And in the presence of such trying and pivotal times (like we also saw during the Civil War, WW1 and WW11) maybe some new industries would develop as a result.Remember that it was financial irresponsibility, lack of oversight among some other misguided knowledge and value based persons who got us into this depth of mess…along with its perpetuations. But make no mistakes in my thoughts here, a pure consumer (credit) based system is not sustainable.Or maybe we need another bubble to get us out of this mess!!!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

Unfortunately, Dr. Roubini has helped set the trajectory for this economic disaster: he called for massive and creative monetary intervention, he has consistently called for a rate cut to zero; he wants stimulus-packages-the-bigger-the-better; he has been a cheerleader for massive bailouts; he fears deflation like a vampire fears the cross, he has never once offered succor or restitution to exploited savers or pensioners or “workers”; he admonished Americans to get over the done deal that this land of liberty has crossed over the bridge of free enterprise with its onus of moral hazard into the brave new economic world of a global financial superpower. His mantra has been: Print. Print. Print. Save the financial system — at any political cost. His economic hero is John Maynard Keynes. He longs for a replay of FDR’s New Deal.Well, he’s got it. Let’s see where he goes with it now.

crgordonDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

replacing an “*” for a “u” in f*cking is as effective yet less offensive method of public communication. Or, just tell me to go f*ck myself. ;>)

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:17 pm

The Fed is saying loud and clear that the train is leaving the track and they have applied all measures possible to keep it from flipping into the ravine, Please fasten your seat belts. This plan depends on the consumer; they will have to start borrowing in large numbers to buy homes, electronics and all the stuff they were buying before. These same people who need to borrow and buy are going bankrupt as we speak. This marks the beginning of do or die for the economy, I just don’t know if the number buyers are available in the economy or those who can borrow even want to. Time will tell.

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:17 pm

Some clown on Bloomberg:“A big, widespread, explosive, incendiary shell has come out of the Fed’s cannon,” said Frederic Dickson, who helps oversee about $19 billion as chief market strategist at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Lake Oswego, Oregon. “It’s a bloody big deal. This is the kick-it-up-a-notch moment.”Translation:“The Fed just lit a big, widespread, hyperinflationary explosive powder cache in its cannon,” said ex VRWC, a commentator on NR’s blog at RGEMonitor.com. “It’s heading for a bloody big self destructive explosion. This is the kick the dollar in the teeth moment.”

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:29 pm

The stock market is rejoicing today as never before while everything else either has gone to deathbed, or will there be soon. Deathbed markers have been attached to heads of:Executive brach (incompetent)Lesiglative branch (as corrupt as Wall Street)Judicial branch (like three monkeys — they don’t care for the eligibility of the Oval office-occupant)Fed (will loan $125 if someone can pay back $100 at some future date)Jane & John Q (pray for the messiah to save them)Me? Born to work and pay tax for all of the above.American with a Constitution — RIP.

SoftwarengineerDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:31 pm

THE BOTTOM WAS EASY TO FIND DURING THE GDIt went on throughout the 30s until WWII.Now, with a fed rate cut to 0, what will the Boomers’ CD rates on their 401Ks be now? 1.5?I estimate about half of the consumer spending [buying and flying] was the retired folks when we had a retirement system in America. I know we’ll get the broke young ones with wage stagnation to buy homes then spend, spend, spend….LOLNow-a-days, the senior workers aren’t retiring at brisk rates, making job slots for younger workers, how can they afford to?Work ’til ya die?

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

OB,Thanks for reading and commenting. You ask: I see nothing of great imagination or efficacy proposed at any level – national, state or local. Can you cite any examples?Currently, in this crisis, no. However, you talk about how “every part of our economy has virtually the best”. I see this as the product of the genius of our form of government and our form of capitalism over so many years – maybe not so much the ones in charge lately or the way that capitalism has become distorted. And in China the picture is the reverse, their history points to class division, centralized control, antiquated bureaucracy. I don’t think they have matured as a governmental entity, in a way that supports the kind of growing up they need to do. And I don’t think their grasp of capitalism has matured beyond the boom stage. I think their cultural constraints do hinder them in ways, what is interesting to me is will they overcome them?The world has a tremendous over-supply problem. We are way too productive. China has an overcapacity problem, and an over supply problem for its major consumers (its new middle class). For its lesser consumers they have a demand problem. And they have an infrastructure and energy consumption problem. They cannot modernize to consume at the US levels, they have too many people.You ask:Given what you’ve seen of the China problem (very well-framed), can you put forth a similar definition of what the American economy must do to adapt?Wow, that is a hard question. Lead? Innovate? Show the EMs the way to modernize into a sustainable future by doing it ourselves? Show the world how the US cleans up its messes? Topic for another blog, I think.Do we have a more severe problem than China? Yes but we may be better equipped to solve it. Once we run the crooks and their enablers out of town, that is, and can get on with it.

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 3:43 pm

Gotta’ say that da Boyz at the the Fed are gettin’ just a little nervous. I expected them to drop rates to practically zero and to print money hand-over-fist. But I NEVER thought they’d go as far as auctioning off Al Greenspan’s baby pages on E-Bay. My-oh-my, the stuff that passes for collateral these days :-) PeteCA

PeterJBDecember 16th, 2008 at 3:43 pm

“The unaware are unaware that they are unaware.”True – for ~95% of the population where they act out their days in automata following their functions drives which gives them the impression that they know something – and hence it is how autopieses works.The question is – what is eventually in store for us cancer /stem cells? What is the final ‘effect’ steering humanity (?) or the planet?And why the other 5%?;-)Ho hum

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

I have it! Let’s put US manufacturing to work. FED ATM’s on every corner. The best money printing technology money can buy! They can pay for themselves!Try thinking about that one for a few minutes. Your brain will explode!

FAMCDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

“You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out.”President Andrew JacksonWhat do you think he was talking about?? :-)

Octavio RichettaDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

Read my posts from the previous threads and you will see I still have the golden touch:-) I wonder how long the run will last. I hope all understand this sort of comment is focused on speculation as opposed to long term investing.With the economy and markets, there are two things that need to be considered:1. Expectations about the economy2. What will actually happenOn 1., I don’t have to tell you what the talking heads are saying: “Recession over by the end of Q109″. I think Goldilocks will stick to this view until strong evidence to the contrary is provided by the data/news.On 2., the FED has done a LOT of things. Yes, the US consumer still has as incredibly heavy lead weight tied to her neck but with ALL that has been done, I still think we will have a pretty bad recession perhaps worse than 74, but, IMO, even this early, one can start ruling out depression like scenarios, at least with the amount of information we have today (Do not underestimate the FED/the power of liquidity the way I did in the fall of 98 when I was heavily short and didn’t cover as my calculations indicated that what AG was doing would not work; I was mistaken!)Bottom line, based on expectations and also what may actually materialize, which will probably turn out to be a bit better than what is priced in stocks today, conditions are in place for a year end rally. This said, I don’t plan to participate in the equity markets in a significant way during the holiday season. Even if this turns out to be a mistake I want to have a peaceful holiday season:-)

DRBDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

ex VRWC, this has nothing to do with this post in particular, but I just wanted to say that I sincerely appreciate your contributions to RGE. You write with tremendous clarity, you are extremely insightful, and when it comes right down to it, I think you’re 110% right on the money with your read on this crisis and all its many subplots.So, in a word, thanks. Keep up the good work!

OuterBeltwayDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

ex VRWC:When you get a moment, please drop me a line at outerbeltway at yahoo dot com.You are another of those people I’ve been searching for.Tks.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

The “system” has been killing off the economic security of the old for a long time now. In my resort area, the tour busloads of oldsters stopped arriving around 1999. There are signs on all the fronts of mortgage lenders for reverse mortgages, to enable oldsters who can’t afford their property taxes and expenses any longer to remain in their homes while the government and the bankers transfer their children’s inheritances to themselves.There are few gray heads in the top restaurants in the area any longer. Many are having to rely upon their boomer children to supply additional money to them each a year, partly for the cost of the new “nationalized drug program” that immediately resulted in a doubling by the pharmaceuticals of the cost of many drugs and bonanza mandatory premiums for health insurers. And, so, the government passed the cost of health care of illegals and low-income immigrants onto the shoulders of the elderly and working others — who pay for Medicare and Medicare Supplement B and the new Drug Plan.Look around you. Don’t buy the media story that the elderly are wealthy. Part of that wealth was in the value of their homes — and you can’t eat your home and have it too.Many of the “boomers” have had a rough go — it’s in their economic histories. And now look what the “system” has prepared for them.

Octavio RichettaDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

ex VRWC somewhere above about USD/oil relationship. My play with USO didn’t work out today but I will give it some time. I will do some more research and add to my position is granted.

LittleFeetDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:24 pm

Good analogy. I would add that the wildebeest are accompanied by the Zebra who herd them into the Mara River giving the lions and crocodiles a feast. Then the Zebra wade in afterwards.

CaponeDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

…occasionally, there are stories about a reporter or businessman being executed in Russia… their way of doing business… well, in light of the fact the entire Russian economy is in shambles based on these oil prices, maybe a visit to the oil pits in the US is in order… i, too, was long the only gosh darn, dang commodity that was down today it seems with the dollar free falling… the wrong people must have been long oil today. hopefully, the right people get long it soon so it can go up again as it should unless the oil rich nations are happy to accept even less monopoly money for their precious oil…

jomosDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

Maybe we could outsource our corporate, civil and educational leaders oversea.) They are pretty popular with foreign journalist.

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

Thank’s. You are too kind. There are so many people writing and blogging to learn from in this thing – I have to say my views are a synthesis of so many others I have been able to share, on this blog and many others. I especially appreciate the leaders and the ones who enable the discussion, like Dr. Roubini. For some real common sense from professionals try someone like Ken and Daria Dolan.There is so much to learn, I guess I bring an outsider’s perspective, being neither an economist or a financial professional but rather an engineer and an interested observer. I guess that is the genius of these blogs – they enable so many different viewpoints. We are all just trying to understand and comment on what is clearly an incredibly momentous time.

Michael KhorDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:34 pm

The price has already discounted due to the expected loss. Anyway,I am of the opinion that it is just stock price manipulation.

REDDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:38 pm

OB,I couple of reasons (I’m sure there are many others)- Chinese salaries aren’t high enought to support consumerism.- Their national savings are tied up in USD to maintain the exchange rate. This savings cannot be “brought home” without massive inflation. Who would exchange Yuan for Dollars??- No social security infrastructure – Chinese don’t spend because they know they will have to finance thier future from savings – nobody is looking after them – Americans better get used to this also, no SS- Limited legal system- rampant pollution and environemtal degradation – no EPA- NO product laws, they are poisoning thier own people putting lead in paint and plastics in baby milkThe list goes on and on. The tide has been high in China for 10-15 years with high growth rates, the tide is now going out and it will expose so many problems, they’ll have a terrible time for the next two years

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 4:41 pm

Just took a small postion (about 2% of assets each) in USO and XLE. Just on feeling, I have no strong conviction. Just follwing my instings since I’ve had the Golden touch since the November low:-)Reply to this comment By Octavio Richetta on 2008-12-16 08:56:14___________nice move -What happened today was off the scale in economic/seismic terms – I think you are correct vis a vis rally time – but the unintended consequences are already beginning e.g. the expense ratio for money market funds and FX markets and USD-JPY 89.0200 -I guess this better work and if it does Bernanke can replace Greenspan in this picutreAs an aside I was speaking just a while ago with my Real Estate agent in down Naples and told her the good news that the target rate is now now zero and mortgages should go below 4% — her initial response was not what I expected – it was one of worrygo figure

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:12 pm

Should one buy longer-term Treasury bonds like ben is doing? or should i buy freddie and fannie like ben? or what about getting in on securitized student loans,car loans and the like? Bens doing it. its easy money right? blow that bubble to kingdom come benny! you can do it – get all that money out there that is just itching to go somewhere.the last great bubble of the united states of america! Coming soon!but wait – no one trusts you.well, that is except those of whom you serve. and you already gave them a pile of money.and in other news:the worlds poor will soon starve so those few can maintain a broken system! watch commodities again!good luck with that, TPTB.signed-the pitchforksp.s dont use the “if you are not for us you are against us” psychology with investors. you are essentially asking me to kill via starvation this time. its not smart money – a pile of dumb money is going into this crap. fuck you. capitalism is dying and it is taking way too long.

Octavio RichettaDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:15 pm

The FED is basically saying the following loud and clear:”If you don’t dare take risks in commodities, stocks, RE, etc; we will screw you BIG TIME: with close to zero rates in low-risk treasuries of any maturity, and ultra low rates in insured CDs; because now that the banks can issue debt backed by uncle Sam they don’t have to come to you, the little guy, for “spare change” via CDs.We don’t give a f*cking dam if you are a senior citizen living on income from a fixed annuity. Bad luck pal! This world is for banksters, the Mozilos and Mad-offs of the world. It is time you don’t forget that people who had first hand knowledge of the depression don’t count anymore, there are too few of them, not enough votes. We don’t need you; and I, Benny, don’t need you to teach me anything about either the depression or living within your means. Me and the Friedmans are the experts on the depression, not you!”

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:16 pm

K,True, I don’t mean to oversimplify, just to imply that we have gone off track in our attempts to avoid what was clearly coming our way with these latest bubbles.I like your thinking that we can get back on track, but my main problem is we cannot turn this corner until we address, fully, the ‘financial irresponsibility and lack of oversight’. And our current approach is to try to cover this up and smooth it over with massive liquidity injections, easing, bailouts, etc, and hope for a cyclical upturn to make it all go away.Until we move beyond these things, they will remain a dragging weight around our collective necks. I know its a pessimistic view, but I am afraid its just realistic. Do you think otherwise? Do you think we have adequately addressed the excesses that got us into this? Or even had a start at transparency?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

It’s important to point out at this point that Bernanke, who dons a flannel shirt at Jackson Hole and wears a timid smile or slight frown of kindly, fatherly concern, is the face behind which operates the most ugly, greedy, dangerous evil that America has ever encountered. His nice, friendly face is the face of the plundering international banking cartel.How did we Americans get to the point where we would give a stranger trillions of our dollars, and all he has to say is, “Trust me”? Never mind who gets it, what they’re going to do with it, how much it is going to impoverish us, or destroy us. Never mind that the bankers are using the money buying up other banks, trampling other people’s rights, sending it overseas to do only God knows what, giving themselves bonuses… Never mind that they are not honest and that they have proven they can’t be trusted.Never mind that we not only can’t trust Bernanke, but that we know he’s cheating. It is said that when dealing in billions and trillions of dollars, even a bishop would be tempted. But Bernanke is more than tempted, he’s maneuvering the heist.From such roots grew the French Revolution. The Fed/government is nothing more than the transit by which the fruits of someone’s labor and resources are taken by those who ride around in limousines and airplanes and otherwise would have nothing. This is the route to totalitarianism. And just like the morass that led to the French Revolution, it gets deeper and deeper.It is a spiral that will be broken, because it has to be broken. For with all the Fed’s posturing and promising and plundering, it cannot print value.

CahillDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:50 pm

So now that Shorts have covered why not go in on a Short ETF like SDS? This thing is primed to capitulate in the next couple of weeks.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:50 pm

You are better off playing a crooked slot machine as opposed to the stock market — at least you might get a free buffet. What do I get for paying my mortgage on time and then paying it off? So far all I see is that my reward is that my interest income has gone down 30% since last December. There goes the repairs to the roof, the new car, and the LCD TV set. If it does not rain the roof does not leak, the old car (2004) works just fine, and there is little worth watching on TV. Thank you Mr. Bernanke. I hope it rains on your house and that your roof leaks.

SonanosDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:51 pm

I think the US dollar should depreciate by 80% further spreading the woes by ripping off the rest of the world. Is this the precipitation to the 3rd World War?

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 5:53 pm

Japan is nice – very civilized – little crime – everything is clean, compact and orderly -yet another anecdote Just returned from a grocery store and had a conversation with the frozen food fellow — I said interest rates (fed fund) went to zero today — his response they want to get people to put their money to work – put it into the stock market and start spending – just like in France reduce the work week to 30 hours to get more people working -

blindmanDecember 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

g, “many fish bite if ya got good bait, he’re a liitle tip i would like to relate..many fish bite if ya got good bait, i’m a goin’ fishin, babies goin’ fishin, i’m a goin’ fishin too.” taj mahal.but not me. say sucker bear market, over and over again.

ex VRWCDecember 16th, 2008 at 6:36 pm

Well put, Guest. Take a name and post under it. Dr. Roubini was prescient, but I don’t think he thinks beyond the current system. Maybe those of us that try just lack his big brains and therefore cannot understand the futility of our hopes.But I don’t think it is political cost. I think is is real, economic cost to you, me, our children, their children, and people all over the world. Would that the cost could just be a political cost, I could live with that.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 6:53 pm

Peter JB, have you ever seen this flash video called The Cheerful Robots?from asadi dot orgif you wait just a second after it finishes, it’ll bring the man’s site up, and there’s a wealth to explore including other good flash videos. Cheerful Robots is pretty short, and quite pertinent.

FAMCDecember 16th, 2008 at 6:59 pm

Willie:Bloomberg filed a lawsuit under the Freedom of Information Act on November 7, requesting details from the USFed on Congressional TARP fund confiscation and disbursement. The Freedom of Information Act obliges federal agencies to make government documents available to the press and public. The USFed operates as a contractor agency. The Bloomberg lawsuit is Bloomberg LP vs Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).Incredibly, with shock to many, the USFed will continue to withhold internal memos as well as information, under the defense that they protect trade secrets and commercial information. TRADE SECRETS BY AN AGENCY HIRED TO MANAGE THE DOLLAR AND TREASURYS SOUNDS SO DIVORCED FROM REALITY AS TO BE DESPERATE. That is quantum levels more preposterous than defying the USCongress when it pursued accounting of the gold status owned by the nation. Anger has erupted within the USCongress. The USFed appears to be hiding information so as to shield suspected corruption, as its public response cites ‘substantial multiple harms’ being avoided. Harm to whom? Is this Nixon all over again citing ‘Executive Privilege’ to conceal crimes and misdemeanors? The USFed is scared and on the defensive. The Board usually does not go into such detail about its position. Lee Levine is from the law firm Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz. He said, “This is uncharted territory. The Freedom of Information Act was not built to anticipate this situation. That is evident from the way the Fed tried to shoehorn their argument into the trade secrets exemption.”

Leo70December 16th, 2008 at 7:14 pm

<A href=”http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20081121/RKOZA21/Columnists/Columnist?author=Harry+Koza”>Read More</A>

aerial viewDecember 16th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

I FIGURED IT OUT BEN-CAN I HAVE MY PHD! Since I first entered the workforce nearly 25 years ago, I have been hearing about the terrible consequences of excess govt spending on the federal, state and local level. That of course was played against the shameful state of never having enough money for healthcare, education, infrastructure, social security, etc. Now, in today’s Fed meeting, BEN made it perfectly clear to everyone by saying that they will do everything and anything possible with no limits to pull us out of this recesssion!What does that mean? How about nearly interest free loans and unlimited assets to the banks and all those deemed “too big to fail”. All of a sudden, there is virtually UNLIMITED amounts of money the Fed will print with not a mention of the potential inflation and currency devaluation time bombs that are hidden right around the corner. We have former Fed officials and economists saying this is the best way forward! Where is Congress’ voice in all of this? So, tonight, I’m issuing PHD’s in economics, finance, business, whatever you like; all you have to do is answer one question: how do you FIX a massive govt and corporate debt problem, high unemployment, high foreclosures, low stock and commodity markets, low consumer confidence and moderate to severe recession all in one shot? If your answer is: PRINT, BABY PRINT OR SHOW ME THE MONEY then congratulations DOCTORS!

MrCDecember 16th, 2008 at 7:40 pm

and that is partially justified with the ridiculous “you can make it if you just want to” myth. As if it always is solely dependent upon just the person attempting. In any complex situation this can obviously never be the case and human life never exists in a vacuum but rather in something that can be termed as a complex situation (with a multitude of factors that can go one way or another).

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 7:46 pm

there’s the irrefutible proof right there that when you steal from people, they’ll hurt you to get it back

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 7:52 pm

Ph.Ds for saleMarie Theriault-Sabourin is a manager in the registrar’s office at Algonquin College in Ottawa. She has a master’s degree in business administration.Quami Frederick used her bachelor’s degree to get into Toronto’s Osgoode Hall law school and was offered a job articling with a Bay St. law firm.Armed with his Ph.D in political science, police tactical trainer Augustus Michalik counts various Canadian and U.S. law enforcement agencies as his clients.The problem is, their university degrees are fake….

EdDecember 16th, 2008 at 7:58 pm

Goldman Sachs perfect record and high-priced stock looks like Madoff Securities International Limited as of last week.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

Day after day we despise and deride the superwealthpowerful ones for their lack of a single scruple, yet day after day we dangle the carrot of limitless personal fortunes in front of them, still convinced they haven’t a scruple, and expect them to resist the temptation.so just WHO is the irrational party?are we truly insane?is this not global insanity writ large?is the answer not as simple as: come to our senses and stop dangling the carrot?doesn’t the crime disappear when and only when the motive for the crime disappears???

Colin LaneyDecember 16th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

> the eligibility of the Oval office-occupantThe Obama born-in-Kenya urban legend. The tinfoil hat issue du jour.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

Good Article:LEAP/E2020 anticipates than the unfolding global systemic crisis will experience in March 2009 a new tipping point of similar magnitude to the September 2008 one.Global systemic crisis – New tipping-point in March 2009: ‘When the world becomes aware that this crisis is worse than the 1930s crisis.http://www.leap2020.eu/GEAB-N-30-is-available!-Global-systemic-crisis-New-tipping-point-in-March-2009-When-the-world-becomes-aware-that-this_a2567.html

KDecember 16th, 2008 at 8:25 pm

@ ex VRWC,I agree with what you allude to – we haven’t began to address the fundamental reasons that got us to this desperate state nor have we began to see any transparency. Just take a glance at the TARP to see what the approach has been. This was passed with little to no oversight where the banks responsible for the mess got billions in order to keep credit going and who still are not lending. Case in point would be Bank of America and the company Republic Windows and Doors in Chicago causing the Illinois governor Blagojevich to call for the government agencies of Illinois to suspend business BoA. In addition to the TARP the FED has also reduced interest rates to near 0% – making money more readily available. The lack of transparency was revealed in the case of B. Madoff.All in all, the issues have not been addressed as the focus has been on clogging the hole of value-losing assets and to get credit flowing again – all within an ailing system.I believe a more systems approach is needed. Instead of attacking sections of the system, we need to address the system as a whole. On top of trying to clog the leak and get credit flowing, regulations and transparency should also be on the fore-front. A system that functions on confidence levels, which sways easily to which ever direction the wind blows, is one that’s founded on an unstable foundation.

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 8:37 pm

If you are a US citizen then you’re not hurting too much if you are in T-Bills right now. You’re losing against inflation (certainly higher than what the Govt’ says), but that’s a minor consideration against possible financial risk. T-Bills are a safe option until you reach your own comfort zone about how to proceed, and what you think the US economy is really going to do. Foreign investors have a bigger headache because of the renewed decline in the US dollar – esp. if they believe the dollar will decline substantially over the next few months. BTW, I’m not saying that all stocks should be avoided. John Hussman’s arguments are relevant (attractive valuations), but you need to be selective and shop around.PeteCA

KerwinDecember 16th, 2008 at 8:47 pm

I don’t believe this is the end just yet. Man is very enterprising and finance brought on by trade will be present in the future. Maybe not in the form as it is known today.What I take from your writing is that, in addition to a shift in the financial super powers will also be an overhaul of the financial system. That I do not totally agree with. I don’t because the system as it stands today works! It has many faults and many misguided and corrupt operators, but weed them out, and address the faulty parts and you will have a better functioning, well-serving system.You said to liken the nation’s situation to a little town with one bank…instead of letting the bank go, wouldn’t it be easier to get rid of the corrupt banker?The responsible parties will have to find a starting point and act effectively and soon because it makes little sense that something like a housing bubble can bring down an entire global system. But then on deeper review we see that the housing bubble (bubbles on the whole) are just manifestations of the ills within the system.As for the case with Germany, I think that is shows a lack of willigness of all parties to act for the benefit of the whole. However, I do understand that Merkel and Germany are acting in the best interest of their country. Just like the banks who receive bail-out funds, some other entities are still trying to come out on top, and are reluctant to make the sacrifices. They’re acting in the best interest of their shareholders – even if it is at the risk of the system. So what we see here is an issue of values.We need a more wholistic/systems approach to the crisis directed at the financial and capitalist system – a more ecological value base would be better.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 8:54 pm

if you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem.if you’re part of the wrong solution to the problem, you’re part of the problem.if you’re part of the right solution to the wrong problem, you’re part of the problem.it’s not about answers to the wrong problem – it’s about ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS.so somebody tell me again:what was the very good reason we ever had, for allowing unlimited personal fortunes?

Wild BillDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

All right already! Things are bad. I get it. Many of you ask where the recovery is going to come from. I’m not sure. I know where it won’t come from. It won’t come from massive government intervention in our finacial markets, government intervention in our housing markets, government infra-structure projects, government, government, government, etc. It will come from the dismantling of huge, bloated corporationss in favor of small, decentralized food and energy producers. Innovative bio-medical products will not benefit from being bought up by large pharmaceutical coporations but will manufacture and distribute their products themselves. Advances in clinical analysis will make it possible for small, independent clinics to provide tests to patients with greater efficiency atless cost. Health care will become more and more decentralized and more available to the public. Education will be moe responsive to the community and less responsive to government beaurocracies. Diversity of enterprises will be the new mantra. Efficiency of waste product recycling will be a major component of the economy, reaching a level almost equal to production. Progress will be measured by incremental reductions in beaurocratic parasitism. Productivity and consumption will decline to sustainable levels with limits defined by the total energy impinging on the earth at any given moment. There will be a net increase in the amount of materials produced until they reach a pre-determined level that is commensurate with the needs of the population. Then that level will be maintained. The myth of perpetual growth must be dismantled as quickly as possible. Feedback mechanisms will become more sophisticated until they rival the homeostatic mechanisms seen in mammalian physiology, in order to avoid the disruptions caused by over production or over consumption. Wealth distribution will have to become more equitable or political stability will be undermined. All these things require that the government stay out of the way. The course we are now following is laying the foundation for fascism. Freedom is essential for our survival. Fascism equal death for the entire planet.

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:22 pm

Today’s action by the Fed is being seen in many quarters as a panacea – perhaps so, but I suspect there is a long list of side effects some of which can be fatal and many of which are unknown (if in fact this is even the correct medicine) – Watching the evening news I wonder what impact today’s actions will have on the sentiment of the all important consumer – In my view if the consumer was nervous and cautious last week, they are now terrified e.g. Obama’s words “we are running out of amunition” – the words of worry expressed earlier today by my real estate agent on the Feds actions come to mind – one more anecdoteI myself am now giving serious second thoughts to expenditures that were all but a done deal just 2 days ago (and I follow this stuff) – I think cash is the place to be for now (thanks PeteCA for your comments above)and while I also agree with OR, JimmytheB, CM and others that rally time is here – that to me is a short term trade (nothing wrong with that)Finally the Asian markets seem somewhat less than impressed – it will be interesting to see how the markets in NA play out on Weds

HayesDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:32 pm

@OR – as I had suggest above – this new post on CRNegative Yields on Money Market Fundshttp://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/12/negative-yields-on-money-market-funds.html

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:34 pm

RON PAUL before the House of Representatives December 10, 2008 (excerpt):The big thing is the big bailout, the $8 trillion, the unlimited amount the Federal Reserve has invested and what we’ve been doing for the past 6 months. We are on the road to nationalization. In many ways, we’re in the midst of nationalization without a whimper.There is no real talk about it. I mean, we’ve essentially nationalized the insurance companies, the mortgage companies, the banks, and medical care is moving in that direction, and now the car companies are going to be run by a car czar from this Congress. I mean, it is such an embarrassment. It is such an insult to us who believe in freedom, who believe in sound money and who believe in limited government. It is such an insult to the whole idea of what made America great, and this is what it has come to – bailout after bailout after bailout – and nobody even calls it what it really is. It is the nationalization of our industries.You know, in many ways, Harry Truman was a much more honest person. He said we should nationalize the steel industry, and he did. Fortunately, we still had a little bit of common sense in our courts, and they said “Hey, you’re going too far.” That’s what we’re doing here. We’re nationalizing. It happens always for good purposes, and we are always going to do good for this group, or that, but you never ask the question “How much harm have you done to the other group?” and that’s what we ought to be talking about. We ought to really find out what this is costing.As much as I strongly believe in the free society – and I can defend it from the economic viewpoint – I also know where we are and where we ought to go.I do believe in the transition. That is, if we need a bailout for the car companies, even though I don’t like the idea, if you could pay for it, take it out of these hundreds of billions of dollars running the American empire around the world. Cut it; bring it home and spend it here, but running up these deficits is going to do us in, and we are working on the collapse of the dollar. That is what you’d better pay attention to. So pay attention. This is a lot more important than this little $15 billion. To me, it has been a gross distraction from the great harm we’ve done in the past 6 months.http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul498.html

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:38 pm

yes, MrC, we tie the poor man’s legs together before the race, then boo him for losing.something wrong with HIM, we tell ourselves.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:44 pm

re: That top 0.25 owns more wealth than the other 99 percent combined.Who is this “top”? I never see any names mentioned.

ORDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:45 pm

I was about to post that one:-) BTW, IMO, all the stuff the FED is doing will not change the long run picture given by shilling in his latest letter (e.g., GDP growth tipping 2% at most for the foreseable future). Would you lend any money at any interest rate to someone who is not productive enough to pay? People no longer want to mortgage their future. They now want productive work!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 9:51 pm

Sonanos, only the fewthousandpersons on earth actually controlling a nukebomb or 3 – plus Dr. Helen Caldicott – are aware that world war 3 is veryvery possible. Everyone else isunconcerned,not going there,listen-to-meit. can’t. happen.Didn’t you get the memo?

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:12 pm

This in today’s CR Comments:Uncle Billy Snorts writes:Pavel: The comments on the wsj article are enlightening as well:”In 1992 the SEC brought charges against a Florida accounting firm, Avellino and Beines, for selling over $440 million in unregistered notes to investors. The complaint mentioned nary a word that Bernie Madoff was managing this money. The lawsuit was then sealed in the Federal District Court in the Southern District of New York. A trustee was put in charge of the money, Mr. Lee Richards. Representing Mssrs. Avellino and Beines was the former head of the SEC in NYC, Mr. Ira “Ike” Sorkin.Now, flash forward to today: Bernie Madoff’s case is filed in the Southern District of New York, which has been soft on Wall Street crimes over the past decade. The very same trustee is put in charge of the records by the SEC: Mr. Lee Richards. The very same lawyer is representing Madoff, Ira Sorkin.”Uncle Billy Snortshttp://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2008/12/negative-yields-on-money-market-funds.html

Octavio RichettaDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:12 pm

Hussman this week is a bit more bearish. He is now in line with our views that the market will make new lows on economic weakness. However, this makes me wonder if we should take him as a contrarian indicator in the short term as, despite all his metrics on market action, I have never been very impressed with his near term market commentary; IMO, he does much stronger on the long term fundamentals.It will be interesting to see what he says next week. I have to say again that what the fed is doing is very powerful in terms of enticing speculators to play the game of risk. And people used to talk about the Greenspan put. Compared to Benny’s put, AG’s put looks more like a call:-) Benny has certainly outdone his boss!What I don’t think Benny can do is make the little guy regain her confidence. The confidence that seems reflected in the market in days like today doesn’t belong in main street.http://www.hussman.net/wmc/wmc081215.htm

Octavio RichettaDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:12 pm

Hussman this week is a bit more bearish. He is now in line with our views that the market will make new lows on economic weakness. However, this makes me wonder if we should take him as a contrarian indicator in the short term as, despite all his metrics on market action, I have never been very impressed with his near term market commentary; IMO, he does much stronger on the long term fundamentals.It will be interesting to see what he says next week. I have to say again that what the fed is doing is very powerful in terms of enticing speculators to play the game of risk. And people used to talk about the Greenspan put. Compared to Benny’s put, AG’s put looks more like a call:-) Benny has certainly outdone his boss!What I don’t think Benny can do is make the little guy regain her confidence. The confidence that seems reflected in the market in days like today doesn’t belong in main street.http://www.hussman.net/wmc/wmc081215.htm

blindmanDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

g, i could say fear, divergent interests (former free and bountiful environment), adulation, envy, advantage, employment, education, indoctrination, disability, niavete, old age, orglobal genocide. “culture” with a small c..”what was the very good reason we ever had, for allowing unlimited personal fortunes?”.when you say “we”, do you mean me and you? or do you mean the human species? or the “founding fathers”? or the queens subjects?i think i get the point here but to be clear concerning a literal answer to the questionrequires more specificity.the world has changed, what was once good for humanity may now be deadly. what was once perceived as necessity may now be obsolete or forbidden. and then their are those things that never change, like change itself.perhaps unlimited personal fortune served humanity better than the alternatives and therefore manifest and succeeded. maybe we are at the point of human evolution, consciousness, where we can see this and recognize that it no longer is the better alternative.but for that to happen we have to be able to present a more appealing alternative.can anyone do that? can any group do that? chain,chain,chain…….speculation in housing market and it’s intersection with finance for example. the industry developed to meet the needs of a population and economy that does not exist. not only did that speculation prove to be a failure, the imbalanced monetary system that drove it may fail..some think it should.. the auto industry. made cars people don’t want. with money they didn’t have..systems may fail. some think it should… the civilian government committed the armed forces to fight and occupy foreign countriesbased on a speculation of cheap and plenty oil supply. this infinitely costly effort mayfail and some think should. fail. so maybe all this failing is really just success.. it seems the concentration of wealth and associated speculative agendas are having a terrible time of it and i think their “luck” will remain poor given they are being bailed out..if people cannot come up with a more appealing alternative at this time and communicate that to their neighbors i think the change we seek will remain unrealized. perhaps for all our lives and our children’s lives.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:25 pm

When Grover Norquist and Co. said their goal was to shrink American government so small they could drown it in a bathtub, he didn’t mean the size of our Government, he meant the legitimacy of our government.Mission accomplished in the public’s unrigorous minds?We constitue governments as a necessary evil for the greater benefits we wouldn’t have without them. What could possibly be a greater benefit to the people than to have no war? But what have we been promised? Endless war.trillions to the weapons manufacturers and merchants and the whole military industrial complex, and we can’t pay our mortgages and have lost our pensions.pure, unadult-erated insanity, nothing less.We are stupendous! We win the prize! There could never be a more hilarious species in all of existence!

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:42 pm

no thanks – no bloody revolution for me, thanks. the only revolution worth having is the lasting one, and that’s the peaceful one where all that gets murdered is the wicked-bad idea to allow overpayunderpay. nothing changes until ideas change. nothing changes until THAT idea changes. the attack point is the space between people’s ears – a race between education and catastrophe this is – and think Kent State – the frightened government will use force, so be careful out there – your strike better be massive in numbers – they’re smart enough to be afraid of numbers – british left India because Gandhi showed them the numbers of people he could summon to the street with his words – give the working people the reasoning, the economic clarity they don’t have yet – yeah, that’s the ticket

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 10:58 pm

i think most people’s values aren’t the problem at all. most people highly value fairness and justice and liberty and peace etc, and always have. the problem is that we’re not acting in accord with what we really all really believe already.

blindmanDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:01 pm

g, you think we’re funny now? wait till you see the size of the bathtub this tarpprogram money is building.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:08 pm

We’re in trouble with the Galactic Council, blindman – we’ve been labeled a level 5 threat to our neighboring planet. Because 10,000 Martians die laughing every time they look down at the Earthlings.

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:19 pm

It is crazy that conspiracy theories have been given such a bad name, especially when some (ok at least one I know of: 9-11) of these are founded on sound scientific principles.After all a “conspiracy” is defined as a plan by a limited group of people to commit an illegal act. In other words, if it was known by everyone it would not be a “conspiracy”, would it? What I mean is that there is nothing unusual, inherently wrong, illogical or otherworldly with conspiracies.Modern media tries to portray conspiracies as something that exists only in fantasyland. This is the case especially in U.S., where this behaviour is likely dictated on the journalists from above. And those above of course do what they feel they have to in order to protect themselves from scrutiny.Conspiracies have in fact been part of human behaviour since time immemorial, at least as long as there has been human governments. Sudden (read: “unexpected” as in “not known to public”) change has typically come through a conspiracy. Just one example of this is the Bolshevik coup in Russia that previous poster refers to.

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 11:22 pm

OR: Main St confidence is affected a lot more by the loss in wealth (home prices and stock portfolio’s), and esp. by the rapid rise in unemployment. In addition. many financial commentators are failing to factor in the mindset of the Baby Boomers – who control a significant amount of investment $$. Boomers have a lot to lose if this recovery is longer than Wall St thinks, or if the US market behaves like Japan during the ZIRP years.PeteCA

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 11:26 pm

I have actually been to the place you mention – where the wildebeest cross the river. You wouldn’t believe the size of the crocodiles – it’s mind boggling.PeteCA

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 11:29 pm

Let’s see if gold can gold above $850-$860 now (that level becomes resistance). Looks very possible … because dollar is still sinking quickly. I did say the dropoff on the dollar would be strong once this process starts unravelling. Main issue is how far the process goes.PeteCA

GuestDecember 16th, 2008 at 11:45 pm

There is no bailout of the banking system…this is a transfer of money from the government/taxpayers to the ultra-wealthy banking elite.Many of these people are taking the money and running before the whole system comes crashing down, leaving for Thailand or South America or some other place where the living is cheap with their millions/billions and hoping to ride out the coming storm.

PeteCADecember 16th, 2008 at 11:50 pm

Adam Hamilton had some nice charts at this link showing why it’s been so hard to trade the current market. The current volatility pattern is much higher, and much more abnormal, than the market usually sees:http://www.321gold.com/editorials/hamilton/hamilton121408.htmlAnd Ceri Shephard had some very good thoughts here about the overall size of the bailouts by the Fed/Treasury. No matter what they say – the hidden OTC market still plays a major factor in what the Fed really worries about.http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/shepherd/2008/1215.htmlAnd after all … isn’t that what da Boyz at the top of Wall St always figured? Build the OTC trades so high that the Fed panicks and bails out the people who caused the problem. It’s the perfect extortion racket.PeteCA

blackdonkeyDecember 17th, 2008 at 12:10 am

美國真係無能用,又唔想股市跌,又要美元有强購買力,又要做大佬.正仆街.揾條黑賓周做總统就以為可以 channge…抵你班仆街屌西中爱滋,食嘢食正屎,飲水飲着尿.

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 1:37 am

I was discussing this with a colleague today. He was telling me a story he heard on the radio of a teacher in Seattle that designed, built, and landscaped his home of 20 years. He was laid off and was foreclosed on. The man had 20 years of equity in the home and is destitute.This is WRONG.The Primes are going to get sucked into this financial disaster.This is going to be the “tipping” point, realization that things must “change” and not only in rhetoric.When established residents of communities start to see their respected, hard working friends / neighbors being foreclosed on and evicted, they will realize, this is WRONG.Unlike the subprimes, option arms, alt-A’s, who new deep down they were “gaming” the system and were happy to walk away. The Primes are not going to be as willing to leave their homes. Their friends and neighbors are going to realize, am I’m next and decide it’s time to make a stand because what they see happening around them is WRONG.This I see as the breaking point. 3-6 months out.Unemployment, IMO, is going to EXPLODE. This is when the Primes are sucked into the disaster. Until now, they’ve been insulated, mostly experiencing the collapse on TV and in their 401k.I agree with the article, realization of the depth and longevity of the crisis is going to reach critical mass within 6 months.IMO, “crazy” policies are going to have to be implemented, right or wrong to cushion the financial fallout.Savers, investors, bankers, wealth is going to have to realize retaining 1/2 of something is going to be better than salvaging nothing out of this mess. The social/ political consequences of this disaster could very well be catastrophic.The US faces an ENORMOUS challenge, as does the rest of the world. We do not need 40,000,000 homeless people in shelters while confronting a deppression.IMO, a “foreclosure holiday” leading to a “Reverse Mortage Equity Option” has to be implemented to enable relief for home owners that are in distress that want to keep their homes. ASAPDeclare CDS side bets and related instruments null and void, only available to participating parties. ASAPDevalue the USD 25%. ASAPTotal Financial Transparency for ALL institutions including the fed. ASAPIMO, there’s gong to be a train wreck. The question is, are there going to be any survivors.

Jason BDecember 17th, 2008 at 3:50 am

The purpose of the bailouts and so on is to get us throught the inauguration. The administration is struggling for an orderly transition of government, continuity of government. If not for the bailouts, the system would have fallen apart – bank runs, empty shelves, social disorder, martial law.

painterDecember 17th, 2008 at 4:05 am

my life has been waiting to overthrow the lies. can you feel it ? feed the poor and help the sick all over the world. can you feel it ? nothing can stop it once we start it

KitDecember 17th, 2008 at 4:11 am

Dr Doom,If the dollar is projected to tumble against all other major currencies, how could commodities prices still fall further?

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 4:18 am

“Wealth distribution will have to become more equitable or political stability will be undermined. All these things require that the government stay out of the way.”Wow how did you correlate these two objectives?

PeterJBDecember 17th, 2008 at 4:36 am

” Finance is too important and unstable to be left to the bankers.”http://regulation.revues.org/document5843.html#texteSee the very lost sentence… and add – and the politicians and all that is attached to them all.Ho hum

heroDecember 17th, 2008 at 4:46 am

I have a question…..Will GM go bankrupt soon????????????According to Bloomberg, they write many articlesrecently stating so….I wonder what the educatedaudience over here thinks. Thank you.hero

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 6:58 am

This is what Medic has been saying. It’s great way to transfer Baby Boomer wealth to Generation X. But we will have to improve on the idea so the “retiree” does not linger as long, consuming money in their paralyzed condition, as this last one did.

OuterBeltwayDecember 17th, 2008 at 7:01 am

Great work, WildBill. To me, this is a viable future vision. There may be others, but this one makes sense to me, and seems doable.It can certainly serve well as a starting point for debate and planning.

devils advocateDecember 17th, 2008 at 7:42 am

Pete CA, thanks for the excellent post -get into the mentalality of someone near or in retirement-”I need the money. I can’t take a chance on the stock market crashing.”= no more $ into stox, sell, sell, sell”I had to run to the banks to save my $. These bozos don’t know whatthey’re doing.”understanding this mentality is not rocket sciencebut is rarely discussed anywherePete: recently the inverse correlation between the dollar and gold has been perfectthe dollar drops 1% and gold rises 1%what do you make of this so perfect correlation?

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 8:33 am

G…a “Reverse Mortgage Equity Option” would would be like a “2nd Mortgage”.Take the selling price of the home – remaining balance = equity.this equity would include “Down Payment” and Principle applied.It is wrong for a home owner to be denied “equity” in their property during times of distress. This would slow down the foreclosure process. The foreclosure laws need to be re-written. ASAP

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 8:45 am

A gift from Your Congress: Off-Shore Trolling Profits for the “Global-for-Profits/US-for-Losses Corps: Bailout Payments and Joblessness for the American People: Scorched Earth for the National Economy. Merry Christmas! from your Representatives:GM Mexican Plants Expand as Carmaker Seeks Funds for RescueDec. 17 (Bloomberg) — General Motors Corp., the biggest automaker in the U.S. and Mexico, increased production of $12,625 Chevrolet Aveos south of the border while seeking a bailout to keep domestic plants from closing.The Detroit-based company and competitors such as Ford Motor Co. shifted more manufacturing to Mexico this year to capitalize on wages less than an eighth of those in the U.S. and factories that make fuel-efficient models. Through November, Mexican plants turned out 5 percent more vehicles than a year earlier, versus an estimated decline of 30 percent in the U.S.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aImmc_hK.uGE&refer=home

Octavio RichettaDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:02 am

Equity aint’mesured in years but in loan balance vs value of home. e.g., if he had a balloon mortgage, interest only mortgage then he would have equity as dictated by the down payment. But given that you say he got the home 20 years ago he probably had a more conservative type of loan. Seems to me your friend always had more home than he could afford. This is of course an opinion as I am on the cheap side when it comes to housing, kinda WB style, which isn’t necessarily right.

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:07 am

Karen De Coster, CPA, gives some tips on Depression survival tactics (on link):We are living in unprecedented times, and as a result, each of us needs to examine our lifestyle, budget, savings and investment plans, and needs vs. wants. The times ahead will demand a level of fiscal restraint that my generation has never before had to endure. I have spent a lot of time in the last two years counseling friends and family about cutting their budgets, eliminating the wants they can do without, and generally, helping them to clean the financial house. Accordingly, I have put together a short list of items to consider for conserving financial resources and keeping yourself prepared in case of a job loss, wage or hours cut, and other events within the depression economy that can negatively affect your personal or financial status. One thing I will not do is provide silly, impractical ideas such as turning down your thermostat (mine is comfortably on 74; I will not shiver and wear triple layers in my own home), cutting back on quality food items that are essential for good health, or riding your bike to work. Instead, I have provided some basic, libertarian-influenced ideas to think about in order to prepare for the tough times ahead…http://www.lewrockwell.com/decoster/decoster139.html

turchinDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:14 am

Dollar crash today?http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/fds/hi/business/market_data/currency/13/12/intraday.stm

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:17 am

U.S. Stocks Fall on Concern Fed Is Running Out of Ammunition (Last Updated: December 17, 2008 09:49 EST)Dec. 17 (Bloomberg) — U.S. stocks fell and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index retreated from a five-week high on concern the Federal Reserve has few tools left to combat the recession after cutting its benchmark interest rate to as low as zero.Morgan Stanley lost 4.8 percent after its $2.2 billion fourth-quarter loss was worse than analysts estimated as investment-banking fees dwindled. Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. declined more than 2 percent. Apple Inc. slid 6 percent after the maker of the iPhone said Chief Executive Officer Steve Jobs won’t speak at the Macworld Expo, spurring concern that the leader’s health is deteriorating.“Following interest-rate cuts you always see an initial reaction and then you get back to your senses,” said Joost Van Leenders, strategist at Fortis Investments in Amsterdam, which oversees $305 billion. “All the structural indicators, such as the economic cycle and profit outlook, remain negative.”The S&P 500 lost 0.8 percent to 906.36 at 9:49 a.m. in New York. The Dow Jones Industrial Average slipped 60.05 points, or 0.7 percent, to 8,864.09. The Russell 2000 Index of small U.S. companies retreated 0.3 percent.The S&P 500 declined after a 5.1 percent rally yesterday spurred by the Fed’s rate cut and its plan to use “all available tools” to revive the economy. The central bank’s decision came after simultaneous recessions in the U.S., Europe and Japan dragged the S&P 500 down almost 45 percent from its 2007 record.Europe’s Dow Jones Stoxx 600 Index slid 0.7 percent, as BNP Paribas SA tumbled as much as 19 percent after saying losses at its securities unit since October more than wiped out the division’s profit for the first three quarters of the year…http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aNRrHRFtRpdc&refer=home

MADecember 17th, 2008 at 9:17 am

p.s. Tri parties have been negative for weeks now. (this is not advertised news) This is prior to the fed move.I can’t wait to see the craziness of the month/quarter/year end as everyone secures everything up! “in the box” requirements versus liquidity injections… Who will win?Miss America

zeblaDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:18 am

“until there are true signs — toward the end of next year — that the global economy may recover in 2010.”What could be the process of that recovery ?Would’nt it be easier to imagine a deepening crisis ?

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 9:18 am

It’s good a lot of the time. Since the amount of gold is limited (mine production has actually been reducing, and central banks have almost stopped selling gold now), it trades inversely to the dollar. Sometimes, however, the two assets (gold, dollar) do diverge. Right now, though, it’s just as you say. A bigger upwards movement in gold is possible for several reasons: 1) Investors realize that gold miners are one of the few profitable sectors right now, and these miners are really undersold, 2) Technical traders realize that gold has broken out of its former downtrend pattern, 3) People holding T-bills shift some of their money into gold (i.e. gold becomes the new safe haven), 4) December is usually good for gold anyway. Actually, all those reasons are positives right now.PeteCA

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 9:22 am

The Fed’s move yesterday really surprised ther market. Therefore, I don’t think the gut reaction response (end of day high) was necessarily the real market response on the news. I think the market has to go away and digest what has happened. It may go up or down. But see where the market is by the end of this week … that’s probably the real reaction to the Fed’s move this time.PeteCA

Octavio RichettaDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:23 am

Madoff Enjoyed $50 Pedicures, 9.8 Handicap, Boat Called ‘Bull’http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aQv4Kmx.cs78&refer=homeDec. 17 (Bloomberg) — Two weeks ago, Bernard Madoff stopped by the Everglades Barber Shop off Worth Avenue in Palm Beach, Florida, for the usual: a $65 haircut, a $40 shave, a $50 pedicure and a $22 manicure. …What a f*cking faggot!

HayesDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:25 am

interesting – today on CNBC Bob Doll was cautiously optimistic with the caveat – as long as this doesn’t morph into a currency crisis – with everything happening faster and sharper

RanMan (Randy)December 17th, 2008 at 9:31 am

VRWC:That was a very nice write up about China that helped me better understand their plight. Thank you!

Jason BDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:35 am

People in this country are going to have to learn to cut their own toenails, and slim down enough to reach them. The coming crash should take care of both.

RanMan (Randy)December 17th, 2008 at 9:44 am

great post. I’m just not sure TPTB are going to allow it to happen. The rich elite are NOT going to sit back and let change that adversely affects them happen without a helluva fight. Look back in history, when A Jackson was fighting the second Bank of the USA (which he eventially won) he was almost murdered by an assassin that tried to shoot him with two pistols! Both mis-fired! This assassin later told his captors that he was paid by the bankers in London and they told him they would protect him.

CaponeDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:51 am

mortgage rates going to zero. dollar going to zero. asset prices must go up. let’s just say this works for holiday banter. home prices rebound, stocks NOMINALLY skyrocket Bovespa-style which will get all of the moronic non currency literate dumb ass sheeple Americans high again. will people then be allowed to borrow again versus their equity in their home to buy $100/ gallon milk, a pair of shoes for $500 and a gallon of gas for $20?future? – introducing for the 8th time the 401K debit card and for the first time bogus home equity card, this time of reflation around the government has rolled out cards allowing funds to be transferred straight from the cards to buy goods and services…based on what i see happening i think i prefer war to hyperinflationary mass global starvation and poverty. anyone else care to chime in on that?

FAMCDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:53 am

OPEC Plans to Cut Oil Ouput by 4.2 Million Barrels a Day, More Than Expected. (CNBC)Will the market like this?Recently, the market seems to like bad news because Govt will “stimulate” it.Complete Madness.Risk to ruin the economy.

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 9:55 am

That is BIG.Talk about supply destruction (or curtailment).This is what happens when the Russians get p***** off and join forces with OPEC.People cwho are expecting low price inflation during this downturn better start revising their estimates.PeteCA

JimmyTheBankerDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:56 am

from Bennet Sedacca (Atlantic Advisors Asset Management) said: The “Fed has declared war on prudence and savers and rekindled the ‘Moral Hazard Card’ except this time, I believe they have created the largest moral hazard ever seen. Of note is that this intervention has occurred in the third week of the month (options expiry for the greatest impact, playing games with an already dysfunctional system that they created) and may force prudent, risk-avoidance types, to take risk, at precisely the wrong time.

Octavio RichettaDecember 17th, 2008 at 9:59 am

Did you read the “blue blood” CPA lady Karen whatever above? Her “Depression Survival Tactics” are just a joke. This lady has never seen a hard day in her life. She should pray to god things don’t get as bad as they did during WW2 in some places in Europe.I have stories from my dad that could fill many pages, like getting an orange for a Xmas present, being the best and only Xmas present he got during the war years. He was a teenager then. And he lived in Italy’s country side. People in the cities had it worse.Or a story from my grandfather’s diary who got married around the time of the 1918 influenza epidemic that killed millions in Italy. On the day he was gonna get married to my grandmother, he asked his father if he could cut the aged prosciutto crudo that was hanging from the ceiling. My great grandad responded: “are you @^#*!#% crazy? With people dropping dead like flies all around us you wanna go ahead and celebrate?Want a depression survival tactics? Have a worn collar in a dressy work shirt? Take it apart at the seam flip it and saw it back! The shirt will look band new again!

MrScepticalDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:00 am

It appears that the government may be buying equity assets ‘secretly’. Given that it would cost them fraction of what it cost to shore up credit markets, it makes sense that the government prop up the equity market which restores confidence. And crisis of confidence this is.I have no evidence to back up my claims, but given that all other markets are heading south and equity market (which is the most opaque and obfuscated of all) is holding up, I can think of no other large player willing to put up money.Equities should be trading at a massive premium to credit. Equity is subordinate to debt and equity holders lose everything when a company goes bust. But now it seems that equities are trading ok whereas credit (much of it is backed by the Govt.) is trading cheaply.

CMDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:03 am

Stocks headed to the greener side…just worked through tough resistance. Going to close the downside SSO gap at$27

Octavvio RichettaDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:04 am

I amm green in my XLE but still red in USO. The XLE USO trade is at break-even so far. I will let it roll but if all the Fed stuff doesn’t work, which is highly likely, this trade could become a big losser if one lets it roll too long.

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:07 am

My immediate reaction – and still holding – is that Bernanke is desperate and pushing all the buttons at once in a frenzy. The move suggests the economy is in free fall, declining like a lead balloon. The melting tangle of toxic financial mess is too intertwined and too big to unravel, and, even if Bernanke could untangle it a bit, there’s not enough value in the economy to fix it. The banking cartel is panicking and has lost it. Every experiment in central planning ends the same — in failure. There is no way Professor Bernanke can predict the reactive decisions of millions of individuals to Fed-created economic maladjustments and to the massive wealth transfers to financials. Nor can Congress make a speech and assuage a nation ravaged by global giveaways and destruction of her work base, i.e., her people’s means of employment.I have well placed friends in my work but they’re not spending. They’re waiting for the next shoe to drop, afraid it might be their job — after Christmas.

FAMCDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:07 am

The possibility of some (central) bank to issue unlimited quantities of money is absolutely ridiculous. How about bartering?Lets trade with cattle, silver, gold, you choose.This legal “couterfeited-like” tender “dollar” will face its fate next year. Wait and see.

economicminorDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:11 am

And what is the point?So a few can feel powerful at the expense of the many?Or because they are soooo disconnected to the real world that they have NO clue?Or because they were born/indoctrinated into privilege that they actually believe they have a special rights? (which they do, not under the Constitution but because we allow it.)Our founding fathers put in place heavy inheritance taxes to prevent this kind of institutionalized wealth but we have flittered away the benefits of what they gave us. Now we either get them back or we go down as a once was and the majority of our population becomes indentured slaves…. The uber rich have always justified themselves above the rest of us, nothing has changed except time.

FAMCDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:14 am

Lets correct CNBC:OPEC announces it will cut oil production 2.2 million barrels a day Jan. 1 to boost oil prices, which have slid on global downturn (CNN)

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 10:15 am

Why Did the Fed Nationalize US Mortgages?Lately I’ve been doing a little thinking about the Fed.Specifically, why did Bernanke decide to effectively start nationalizing US mortgages? That is what they are doing – if the Fed prints $$ and buys US bonds directly. By forcing down the rate on the US bond to 3-3.5%, they make it possible for the Gov’t to offer mortgages at 4.5%.But why did they do this?After all, the US home price market is well into correction territory now. Down something like 20%, it is maybe halfway to Shiller’s target (40% drop). So if home prices are corecting through free market action, why should the Fed get involved?Previously I speculated that the reason was that the Fed is terrified that another 20% drop in home prices will gut the remaining banks on Wall St. It could, of course. Take a look at Bank of America’s stock price today. Then consider what some further big reductions in Level-2 and Level-3 assets might do. So that was my rationale for understanding Bernanke. And it could well be a prime motivating factor.But it dawned on me that maybe Ben and Hank have actually done something smart here.Yep, you did hear me say that.Don’t get me wrong. I’m not happy about the US economy. But check the reasoning.It’s been well known that if China starts dumping US treasuries and bonds that the US credit market will be in deep trouble. In fact, the Chinese don’t even have to start selling their bonds. They only have to stop buying new ones. And they have issued this threat several times – in an effort to force Washington to change its financial behavior. To no avail, I might add.Very recently Chinese spokesmen announced that China might need to “save itself”. A grim warning. Translation: Very likely China will stop adding US bonds and treasuries, and might even dump some holdings. In this nasty recession, it’s every man for himself now. Even if it kills the other guy.Such a move would be catastrophic for the USA right now. It would force bond yields to bounce upwards, driving a stake into the US mortgage market. It occurred to me that Ben and Hank figured all of this out, and decided they MUST insulate the US housing market from any adverse moves by China. So they have effectively nationalized the mortgage system. They are artificially keeping rates at the long end of the curve low, and stopping any sudden spikes in the yields.If this is true … it’s actually a smart move by the Boyz in the Fed and the Treasury. It at least gives them a little bit of control in the situation. It’s better than seeing a crash in bond prices, and the huge knock-on effect on the US housing market.Finally, none of this means I like what’s happening. The US economy is still on the road to Dante’s inferno. It just means that Ben and Hank have a little room to tweak the air conditioning unit in Hell. That’s all.PeteCA

Little SaverDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:16 am

Investors seem to agree with the long term ZIRP (zero interest rate policy) hypothesis of Nouriel Roubini: Euro up to 1.4374, Yen up to 87.55. Nobody seems to love the Dollar, what reason could they have?

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 10:19 am

Big difference between 2 million and 4 million barells per day. Someone better get their figures right out there.PeteCA

HayesDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:22 am

Morning, CM – I agree that today will likely be green based on typical action day after response to fed BS down early and then reverse – could you briefly (please) explain the phrase “close the downside SSO gap at $27″Thanks

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 10:22 am

Forign investors are dumping US assets. My guess is they are fleeing T-Bills. Watch the yield on T-Bills and see if it’s true. It’s also a very good time for foreign holders of UST’s to sell out of that market.PeteCA

FAMCDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:23 am

PeteCA,CNBC was gossip,CNN posted “news”CNBC already corrected:”OPEC oil ministers agreed on Wednesday to remove a record 2.2 million barrels per day from oil markets in a race to balance supply with the world’s rapidly crumbling demand for fuel.”

PeteCADecember 17th, 2008 at 10:25 am

Told ya’, OR.Big dropoff in US dollar once we’re on the other side of the trend.Bank of Japan will not be happy about rapid deterioration of yen/dollar ratio, esp. below 90. You may see some intervention at some stage.PeteCA

Jason BDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:31 am

Agreed. If we can read the signals from China, so can Ben and Hank.That means that it is a forgone conclusion that China has lost its appetite for Treasuries.Bad,very bad. My worst case scenarios keep coming true.

aerial viewDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:32 am

A weak dollar makes U.S. made products and services must cheaper for export, thus benefiting the multinationals. This benefit pales to the liability of decreased buying power of the American consumer and is in effect, an inflationary measure. But, this is how 3rd world countries get started!

MM CADecember 17th, 2008 at 10:36 am

OPEC announced it will cut daily production by 4.2 million barrels from September output. It is cutting 2.2 million barrels from current daily production. Crude prices spiked on the announcement, but have since retreated. Crude is now back in negative territory, trading with a loss of 0.6% at roughly $43.35 per barrel.

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:42 am

“How did we Americans get to the point where we would give a stranger trillions of our dollars, and all he has to say is, “Trust me”?”The same way we got to be a country that would elect a President who never had to prove that he was eligible to hold the office – just had to say “Trust me”http://www.yourfellowcitizen.com

Mr Populace Tong LingDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:47 am

This is not absurd because many americans only worked trading assets and left the hard work to chinese and other 3rd world coutries.Now americans will have to work for we 5rd world people.:-)

Octavio RichettaDecember 17th, 2008 at 10:48 am

Anatomy of a MeltdownBen Bernanke and the financial crisis.by John CassidyDecember 1, 2008http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/12/01/081201fa_fact_cassidy?currentPage=allThe other event that changed Bernanke’s career occurred in the summer of 1999, at the height of the Internet stock boom, when he and Gertler were invited to present a paper at an annual policy conference organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. The topic of the conference—which takes place at a resort in Jackson Hole, Wyoming—was New Challenges for Monetary Policy. Then, as now, there was vigorous debate among economists about whether central banks should raise interest rates to counter speculative bubbles. By increasing the cost of borrowing, the Fed, at least in theory, can restrain speculative activity and prevent the prices of assets such as stocks and real estate from rising excessively.Bernanke and Gertler argued that the Fed should ignore bubbles and stick to its traditional policy of controlling inflation. If a bubble inflated and burst of its own accord, they said, the Fed could always bring down rates to alleviate damage to the broader economy. To support their case, they presented a series of computer simulations, which appeared to show that a policy of targeting inflation stabilized the economy more effectively than one that targeted bubbles. The presentation got a mixed reception. Henry Kaufman, a well-known Wall Street economist, said that it would be irresponsible for the Fed to ignore rampant speculation. Rudi Dornbusch, an M.I.T. professor (who has since died), pointed out that Bernanke and Gertler had overlooked the possibility that credit could dry up after a bubble burst, and that such a development could have serious effects on the economy. But Greenspan was more supportive. “He didn’t say anything during the session,” Gertler recalled. “But after it was over he walked by and said, as quietly as he could, ‘You know, I agree with you.’ That had us in seventh heaven.”Another expert who dissented from the Greenspan-Bernanke line was William White, the former economics adviser at the Bank for International Settlements, a publicly funded organization based in Basel, Switzerland, which serves as a central bank for central banks. In 2003, White and a colleague, Claudio Borio, attended the annual conference in Jackson Hole, where they argued that policymakers needed to take greater account of asset prices and credit expansion in setting interest rates, and that if a bubble appeared to be developing they ought to “lean against the wind”—raise rates. The audience, which included Greenspan and Bernanke, responded coolly. “Ben Bernanke really believes that it is impossible to lean against the wind on the way up and that it is possible to clean up the mess afterwards,” White told me recently. “Both of these propositions are unproven.”Between 2004 and 2007, White and his colleagues continued to warn about the global credit boom, but they were largely ignored in the United States. “In the field of economics, American academics have such a large reputation that they sweep all before them,” White said. “If you add to that the personal reputation of the Maestro”—Greenspan—“it was very difficult for anybody else to come in and say there are problems building.”IMO, you need to have been an academician in a highly quantitative field in order to understand how narrowly focused PhD thesis research, and even a seasoned academician’s research agenda, is. Usually, the more quantitatively oriented the researcher (e.g., Bernanke), the narrower the focus.Bernanke is one of the smartest persons in the word but math smart does not always translate into real life smart. The simulation stuff above makes me laugh. I used to write HUGE stochastic systems symulations for a living of systems much simpler than the US economy. It is extremely difficult to capture the features of the real system that make simulation reuslts robust. There is a a lot of room for errrors and manipulation of results.Benny’s colleague who says the stuff Bernanke believes in has not been proven in practice is quite right.The bottom line is that Benny is using us, the US/world economy, as a huge lab to test his naive theories. The problem is that we are not just a bunch of white mice:-)yes, be afraid, bery afraid….

CMDecember 17th, 2008 at 11:09 am

Hello Hayes,if you look at an hourly chart of the SSO, there is a “gap” down in price which usually indicats traders got cuaght on the wrong side of the trade and it usally represents too much supply at that level. Once stocks get back to those levels (close the gap) and traders can be made whole, they exit poitions, they feel lucky to break even and it begets more selling. SO, todays direction, green or red, should be determined by what happens at that $27 level in the SSO. If we bust thorugh it on volume, daytraders will rocket the market higher and vice versa.

economicminorDecember 17th, 2008 at 11:17 am

Many seem to think that all the money pumped in was suppose to actually do something other than keep these institutions from going out of business. I think the leverage was so great, that in the end, there was no way to stop the inevitable anyway. But only time will tell us that.Seems that many think that the borrowing wasn’t put to some other (better in you opinion) use. But what did you think they were going to do? Couldn’t just let our entire banking system collapse. You’d have been really pissed then.If you were in their place, what would you do? Remember that this is THEIR wealth and POWER on the line..(besides yours, which they really care little about) and in a way their reputations as the rulers of the world. Would you care of the consequences to the peons and serfs if you were them or would you do everything possible to maintain you prominence?

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 11:43 am

why be afraid, when we could simply be fair and have nothing to fear? “Love casts out all fear” is a very, very condensed wisdom. we need to unpack that packed sentence.

economicminorDecember 17th, 2008 at 11:43 am

Bush is just a manikin, a front guy. And not one with either integrity or intelligence. Dress him up and tell him what to say and he looks OK. Leave him on his own to speak and anything but mostly dumb comes out of his mouth. I sometimes refer to him as an idiot. This is what you get when to much wealth is left in the hands of the few for to long. He is no different than the King George and his minions we revolted against.Why bother with a stilettos? Your anger is misplaced. The messes are way beyond GWB or any recent President. They go to the root of evil and those with the power to create wars and famine and buy elections and enslave a nation thru debt and attack other nations without just cause.It was easy for Madoff as those in power are so disconnected from the real world that they don’t even know anything about right or wrong. How could people like this have any idea that Madoff was running a Ponzi Scheme? I don’t think they believe in gravity or consequences.

GuestDecember 17th, 2008 at 12:47 pm

Yea NAFTA is really working! Our economists and elected leaders have a lot to be proud of the benefits of having no more jobs in the country is profound and brilliant. So what if we don’t have jobs and money to buy food and heat our homes we just have to give it more time the brilliant theories the economists assured us of we’ll all be proven right eventually. Everyone lets celebrate the ‘free-markets’ it feels joyous and liberating just like they told us it would be.

Lord SidcupDecember 17th, 2008 at 2:24 pm

Of course not. That’s why The Poodles That Beg are going to have to be got rid of.Have the rich elite’s got the belly for a helluva fight.

economicminorDecember 17th, 2008 at 3:40 pm

The issues that need correcting are so many from energy planning to urban sprawl to water resource allocation, transportation, maintaining a sustainable environment to the financial system disaster. We have laws that dictate one thing, common sense that says something else, survival another, a sustainable future another and all these issues and many more have to be reorganized for an optimal outcome in the face of huge debts and declining resources all hindered by belief systems that are archaic at best.Boy oh boy what a challenge!

Wild BillDecember 17th, 2008 at 8:58 pm

Diversity=life—uniformity = death. It is so in nature. Economic activities are not merely metaphors of living systems, they are integral components of living systems. There is little discernable difference between cash flow and energy flow or surplus production and biomass. Living systems depend on a dynamic equilibrium between central and local feedback mechanisms, with neither ever gaining total control. High productivity and low diversity are characteristics of young, unstable, ephemeral systems. Sustainability comes with development of high diversity, higher accumulation of biomass reserves, lower productivity and the development of decomposition energy flows that are almost equal to the production flows. So it is in living systems, so it must be in economics. Again, they are not metaphors of one another. They are one and the same.

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.