EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

Transcript of Talk at AEI seminar on the “The Deflating Mortgage and Housing Bubble, Part IV: Where Is the Bottom?”

Here is below the annotated transcript of my talk at the American Enterprise Institute’s September 30, 2008 seminar “The Deflating Mortgage and Housing Bubble, Part IV: Where Is the Bottom?” The transcript is courtesy of The Housing Doom. For those who are interested there is also a video version of my talk.

Nouriel Roubini: [23:34] Well, Desmond Lachman described very well in his remarks why things are getting worse rather than better in the housing market, and I share his outlook and pessimism. I would like to elaborate on the broader picture about what’s happening in the economy and the financial markets.

I’ve been saying for a while this will be the worst financial crisis the US has experienced since the Great Depression and it looks like the worst one. I mean I don’t think there’s anything that’s happened since the Great Depression looks so severe. Of course the real economic consequences in terms of output contraction are not going to be as bad as the Great Depression because there is a massive amount of policy action, but in terms of financial shock, I mean what does happen in the last few months is really quite unbelievable, every other week another major financial institution going belly up.

The other observation is that while we’re talking about subprime mortgages and housing, I think there’s a growing recognition that this was not just a subprime mortgage problem, where there much more generalized asset bubble and credit bubble in the economy. It was subprime, it was near-prime it was prime mortgages, there were massive excesses also of underwriting in commercial real estate, the boom in the indebtedness of the household sector included also unsecured consumer credit like credit cards, auto loans, student loans with all this other excesses in the corporate sector [25:00] coming from LBOs that should never have never occurred, financed by these leveraged loans, a trillion-plus LBO with a debt to equity ratio that didn’t make any sense. Excesses of borrowing also by municipalities — in the last real estate recession muni bonds were trading like junk bonds because there were many municipalities going belly up, the same thing is going to happen right now.

And even in the corporate sector that was on average in better shape than the housing sector there was a fat tail of corporates that were highly indebted with little profits. They issued a huge amount of junk bonds and corporate default rates that had been very very low, for the last couple of years, are going to be surging in a major way, and once this major surge of corporate defaults is going to occur this is other huge time bomb of the CDS market where about $55 trillion of nominal protection has been sold against an outstanding stock of only $6 trillion of corporate bonds.

So when you add it all up as you remember I’d estimated that the losses would be at least $1 trillion, and more likely close to $2 trillion, and at that time people thought I was exaggerating but of course a few weeks later IMF came with an estimate of $945 billion, then Goldman Sachs $1.1 trillion then John Paulson said $1.3 trillion, then IMF revised their estimate to $1.4 trillion. Most recently Bridgewater Associates said that the losses are going to be $1.6 trillion, so we don’t know how large they are going to be. What we do know is that the $1 trillion number at this point is not the ceiling, it’s just barely a floor, and the losses are going to be much more.

And there is also implication for, of course, for the TARP program and the recapitalization of the banks, because if all these losses are going to occur, the idea of injecting only $250 billion into the banking system, the financial system is going to do the job, I think is very far-fetched. I think the eventual number is going to be more like $600 or $700 billion, especially now that it is not just the banks, but also broker-dealers, insurance companies — soon enough the financing arms of GMs and GEs and … you name it, and whatever.

So the size of the problem is huge. And of course there is this vicious circle that’s been discussed between the financial shock leading among other reasons to the economic contraction, and now the economic contraction occurring, then the financial losses, the credit losses, delinquencies for households and corporates rising making the financial strains even more severe.

That leads me to the second point that is — we are in a very severe recession in the United States. I’m not going to go into the detail of it, but I do believe that it is going to be the worst economic contraction that the US has experienced for the last few decades. The typical US recession lasts about 10 months, the last two lasted only 8 months each. The 2001 recession actually — contraction of output from the peak was only 0.4 percent, for the average recession it’s been less than 2 percent. I feel this is going to be equivalent to fall of output of the order of 4 to 5 percent, the worst we’ve had in the last 50 years. We’ve 8 quarters of contracting output and input the beginning of this economic contraction at the 1st quarter of this year.

And as pointed out essentially by Desmond, this housing recession is not bottoming out. The production of new homes starting is falling sharply, but demand until recently had fallen even more, therefore this excess supply of inventory of the new and existing homes kept on becoming larger, and that put downward pressure on home prices.

Based on Case-Shiller, home prices have already fallen by about 20 percent from the peak, given the excess supply number and other factors I would expect home prices are going to fall another 20 percent for a cumulative fall of 40 percent from the peak. Now in 1991, the cumulative fall based on Case-Shiller was only 5 percent, now we’re going to have 20, another 20, 40 — something we haven’t seen since the Great Depression.

Now this fall in home prices is important for 3 reasons. As long as it occurs, residential construction is going to keep on falling in absolute terms as a share of GDP. Secondly there is the huge wealth effect coming from a fall of $6 trillion of housing wealth. But most important factor I think is that right now ongoing is that with such a fall in home prices, by the end of next year about 40 percent of all households with a mortgage are going to be underwater, negative equity with the value of their homes below the value of their mortgages. So, about 21 million out of the 51 million houses that have a mortgage, will be under-water by the end of 2009. And there’s a huge incentive to walk away from your home, because the US mortgages are not recourse loans.

Now, not everybody is going to walk away. Let’s be even conservative. Let’s assume that only 1 out of 5 people that are underwater are going to walk away. If you do the math — I’m not going to go into the detail of it — you get additional losses for the financial system of the order of $400 billion dollars. This is on top of all the other write-downs that have already had been made through subprime-kind of a writedown. [30:00] So that’s another huge loss for the financial system. This is just assuming that only 1 out of 5 people underwater are going to walk away. If it’s more like 40 percent, then the losses is another $800 billion. So you’re in a situation in which you can wipe out a good chunk of the capital of the financial system. So that’s what we are observing.

The other important point to put things in the global context I think is that while 6 months ago it looked like the US was the only advanced economy that was going — undergoing an economic contraction, starting with the 2nd quarter of this year — so even before the major financial shock of September / October occurred, and this financial shock are now making credit conditions even more tight — but even before then, if you look at the 2nd quarter data, Eurozone growth was becoming negative, UK growth was becoming negative, Canadian growth was becoming negative. Same in New Zealand, same for Japan, same for most of the other advanced economies. About 60 percent of GDP, that is most of the GDP of the advanced economies was already contracting in the 2nd quarter of this year. This is before these other shocks are going to make these things more severe.

At this point it looks like we’re not going to have just a US recession, or an advanced economies recession, we’re also going to have a global economic recession, because there is a massive amount now of re-coupling in financial markets and also in real economies, also among emerging market economies. Of course, the re-coupling of financial markets has already occurred big-time, equity prices in Europe and in emerging markets have fallen even more than United States, but now you see significant channels of transmission to emerging markets — trade channels, credit channels, financial channels, currency channels, commodity channels, confidence channels. It’s a massive slowdown of growth, and I would estimate that already in the 3rd quarter of this year, and certainly by the 4th quarter global GDP growth, measured at market prices, would already be negative.

So we are going to have a global economic recession. And by the way, within the emerging markets, there are about a dozen economies are now on the verge of a financial crisis. Thinking emerging Europe — countries like Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Belarus, Ukraine; you go into Asia, trouble in Pakistan, Indonesia and Korea. You go into Latin America — trouble in Argentina, in Ecuador, Venezuela, just to name a few. So this is a global economic recession.

Now going back to the financial market, the other thing that’s kind of a matter of concern — there is a bit of a disconnect right now, that thing is worrisome, between the more and more aggressive policy actions that the policy authorities are taking — I would say even going the right direction — and the fact that the markets have seemed to lost confidence in the ability of the policy makers to do the right thing. And I’ll give you a couple of examples.

When the bailout of the creditors of Bear Stearns occurred in March, and then we created a TSLF [2] and a PDCF [3] that essentially bailed out the broker-dealers, providing them with liquidity for the first time since the Great Depression through the Feds, there was a rally in the stock market, in the money market, and in the credit markets. That rally lasted about 8 weeks. Then when trouble started to occur in July with Fannie and Freddie and Paulson went to Congress says, “Give me the power of the bazooka, if you do I’m not going to have to use the bazooka, but give me that power, it’s going to stabilize Fannie and Freddie,” there was also a rally lasted about 4 weeks. Then in early September when Paulson had to use the bazooka and actually bail out, and essentially make public $6 trillions of assets and liabilities of Fannie and Freddie, and inject a couple of $100s billions there was a rally. It lasted 1 day. On that Monday after the bailout. By the next day, remember, the panic was about Lehman.

And then the next week when the collapse of AIG and the bailout of AIG occurred, there was not even a rally, on that Wednesday remember it was utter panic — the market fell 5 percent.

Then they went for the TARP legislation, and you would expect that that would have improved the markets. On the Thursday after the Senate passed it, and on the Friday the next day when House passed it, stock prices fell sharply, both on Thursday and Friday.

And then the following week when the Fed was doing all the new actions, Doubling and tripling the TF, the TSLF, the swap lines, coordinated policy reduction, the new commercial paper facility was assault on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday — market fell that week by 20 percent.

By that Friday before the IMF meeting, we were literally one epsilon away from a systemic financial meltdown. At that point the policymaker got religion. They realized that these step-by-step ad-hoc approach to managing the crisis did not make sense. And it started doing something more systematic. So you had the G7 Communique and then the EU Summit.

Now, what did they decide? They decided first of all that no systemically important financial institution is going to be allowed to fail. I.E. they decided that it had made a mistake letting Lehman go. Secondly they said we are going to provide unlimited liquidity to the financial system as a way to unfreeze this kind of liquidity crunch. Three, we’re going to recapitalize [35:00] financial institutions with public money, these preferred shares. Four we’re going to guarantee a wide variety of liabilities of the banking system, that policy’s new debt making inter-bank lines. And fifth, we’re going to do everything as is necessary to avoid systemic financial meltdown.

Now, given that massive aggressive policy response the market rallied on that Monday for a day, by 10 percent. And then a slew of lousy news about the economy and markets fall all of that week, and then the last week it was all the slew of bad earnings news and market became worse and worse and worse.

And just the other day when the markets went up 10 percent, what were the good news that day? The consumer confidence had collapsed like never before in 50 years, and because the Case-Shiller number was still showing a freefall of the markets.

What that tells me is that currently financial markets are dysfunctional. Fundamentals don’t matter, valuations don’t matter, it’s just the flow that matters these days. And in most days what has happened for last couple of weeks in spite of this major policy effort is been is that there is a flow of sellers — and there are not that many buyers — in most days markets are falling very far, very sharply. So it’s becoming a really dysfunctional financial market, in which even the very aggressive policy action do not seem to make a difference. And that’s something that worries me.

Now why do I think that the bottom in financial market is not been reached yet — for 3 reasons and I’ll conclude on that. The first one is that I think that the flow of market-economic news are going to surprise on the downside for the next few weeks and months. People have priced now a US recession, but if this US recession is I believe going to be more like 24 months, rather than only 8 months, and is going to be global, then there will be surprises on consumption, investment, on housing, on employment and industrial production. Those surprises are going to be negative for the market.

Secondly, I think there will be negative surprises also for earnings. Not just earnings of financial firms, but also in a severe recession a sharp contraction of the earnings of the non-financial corporate sector. That’s going to be a negative for the financial market. And the third reason is that while the sources of a systemic financial meltdown has been somehow contained, I still see as a lot of potential threats to the financial system. One is this major surge of corporate defaults is going to occur in the next year or so. The second one is related to it is the blowup is going to occur in the CDS market is a major source of the systemic risk. Third of all you are going to have hundreds of hedge funds are going to go bust in the next few months, and while none of them is as large or as leveraged as LTCM was in 1998, if you have 300 to 600 of them going bust all at the same time, and having to deleverage and sell assets in a distressed market, then the consequences are going to be negative for asset prices.

And finally there is this other time bomb of many emerging market economies, the risk of a financial crisis. And any of them going bust could have contagious and systemic effects. And one example — take Iceland. Little small island of 300,000 folks in the middle of Atlantic. Their banks had borrowed an amount of money was 12 times the GDP of the country to buy toxic MBSs, CDOs and you name it. Now the banks are bust, the government doesn’t have resources to bail out the banks, and these banks will have to sell, in a highly distressed and illiquid market, a huge amount of distressed assets. And even a small tiny island like Iceland can have systemic effects on asset prices, let alone if you have a blowup of Hungary, or Argentina, or Korea, or other economies.

So, for the last few months people have always been calling the bottom. Every time there was a major event they said this is the cathartic event that says the markets have bottomed out. They said it after Bear Stearns, after Fannie and Freddie, after AIG, after TARP, after the G7 Communique. And each time markets have rallied for a little bit, and have gone further south. Unfortunately I don’t think we’re at the bottom of the housing crisis, we’re not at the bottom of the mortgage crisis, we’re not at the bottom of the financial and banking crisis, and certainly we’re not at the bottom of the severe economic crisis. So I’m quite still pessimistic looking ahead. Thanks.

Alex Pollock: Thank you Nouriel. I hope you’re all feeling better. [laughter] Just before we go ahead to Tom I have one question, Nouriel, for you. I think it was implied in your comments that you would recommend the entirety of the TARP — the $700 billion — be used for capital additions to financial firms. Would that be a fair conclusion from your comments?

Nouriel Roubini: Yes. I think that the capital needs of the financial system are going to be much more than the $250 billion. I thought that even originally the TARP as an idea of buying at high prices toxic assets was a bad idea if you look any history of systemic banking crisis, in most cases the way you recapitalize the banks is by injection of public capital either common shares or preferred shares or sub-debt — it’s really the exception, the idea of buying toxic assets. [40:00] So I think most of it is going to be used for that and maybe we’ll have a TARP II at this point. It may be needed to buy more stuff to recapitalize more. I would not exclude that.

Alex Pollock: OK, thanks. Tom. [40:12]

275 Responses to “Transcript of Talk at AEI seminar on the “The Deflating Mortgage and Housing Bubble, Part IV: Where Is the Bottom?””

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 11:45 am

“by the end of next year about 40 percent of all households with a mortgage are going to be underwater… about 21 million out of the 51 million houses that have a mortgage, will be under-water by the end of 2009….Let’s be even conservative. Let’s assume that only 1 out of 5 people that are underwater are going to walk away…This is just assuming that only 1 out of 5 people underwater are going to walk away. If it’s more like 40 percent, then the losses is another $800 billion. So you’re in a situation in which you can wipe out a good chunk of the capital of the financial system. So that’s what we are observing.”

I find the above statements to be extreme – NR is talking about 4 to 8 million walk-aways – perhaps but what is the basis for such an assertion?

AfANovember 18th, 2008 at 11:49 am

tredje, derde, troisième, drittel, τρίτος, terzo, terceiro, терция, tercero, tredje, 第三人, 제3, 第3の, الثالث, שלישיThird?

SteveNovember 18th, 2008 at 11:52 am

Professor:You say “while the sources of a systemic financial meltdown has been somehow contained, I still see as a lot of potential threats to the financial system.”Do you mean to say you feel confident a meltdown has been definitively averted, or that there is still a threat of a meltdown?I got my MBA at night there 1988-1992, sorry I never had a class with you.Thank you.

MANovember 18th, 2008 at 12:02 pm

@ Outerbeltway & Miss ItalyOB, I have taken some liberties… (I’m sorry for not asking in advance) and contacted some media sources, to explain the grassroots evolution that may be taking place within the community of bloggers with regards to our economic crisis. In addition, I will likely pop in and out of the conference call. I’m sorry, but meetings/conflicts will prevent me from participating in the full hour.I have not yet heard back from them, but I will let you know what I hear.In the meantime, it’s my opinion that in order to gain traction and merit, we need some media savvy ideas that will help the evolution of our network.First: A catchy name / acronym that can be passed on to the media. So that media outlets can quote/reference) I hate to say it, but catchy sells! (in other words… I’d consider ditching “RGE BrainTrust”. It’s your baby, so I won’t force you to rename it… but I suggest giving it some thought.)Simple ideas that come to mind are:I.C.E. – Independent Community/Committee of Economists???P.F.E.C – The People’s Forum for Economic Change(ex. Minutes from the first I.C.E. meeting were as follows…)Second: Well designed “talking points”. (Most bloggers enjoy anonymity. I suspect there will be many “ghosts” on the conference call so be prepared to speak often if you are going to be a contributor.)@ Miss Italy “If you build it… He will come” – Field of Dreams. I would be willing to participate if you can put something together. I am 9-5 M-F, so I’d need to work around that obligationThanks, and I’ll talk to you tomorrow.Miss America

JGUNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:04 pm

Can I borrow your crystal ball for a day, my dear professor? I need to see into the future too, lol.Wall street hates you, lol.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Suggestion – in selecting a name or acronym – see if you can register the .org /.com domain equivalent at the same time.

BobNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

What is the percentage of foreclosures currently? Now subtract that from the 4 – 8 M and you will see it’s not that far away.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:18 pm

Test TimeDJIA 8,228.66 -44.92S&P 500 839.82 -10.93NASDAQ 1,455.17 -26.88as of 13:17 ETTuesday, November 18, 2008

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

why don’t they just close the markets until next monday after november options expire and skip this holding pattern around 850 for the next 3 and a half days?i did not know it was possible to fall off a cliff in slow motion like this…

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

massive asset deflation coming – so far 30 Trillion in asset losses and only 3 Trillion in govt printing is the current score -

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:26 pm

…let me get this staight… a single mother gets a second job,extends the mortgage to fifty years saves the house but who is home with the kids?Burnout will surely follow sooner than later…

CahillNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:35 pm

I was just about to say the same thing. Very familiar. And lets be realistic yes there is some inequality but comparing a fruit picker to a ceo is not equitable. A CEO could pick fruit, a fruit picker without education would not know the first thing about running a company and I mean all the regulatory criteria that must be addressed. Engineers do jobs that 99% of us could not ever fathom, they deserve to be at the top of the food chain. Doctors don’t deserve the inequity against nurses who do 90% of the work, the docs deserve more but not 5-10X more. You could go on forever with comparisons but let’s be realistic not every job deserves “EQUAL” pay it just doesn’t make sense.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:47 pm

Think of all the people who have vacation homes who are underwater and can’t even afford their primary residence.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:49 pm

Its breaking downDJIA 8,162.39 -111.19S&P 500 833.28 -17.47NASDAQ 1,441.78 -40.27as of 13:48 ETTuesday, November 18, 2008

iNnOsInZNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:52 pm

Why involve the media in early talks? Its the media who exagerates and makes things worse.I think once we have solid agendas and working groups, then we could seek attention and use media as leverage. The first talk atleast is going to be very broad and vague (no solid research)Just my 2cents.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

Naaaawwwww, today will be another day to add to the list of PPT save dates…this thing will be green by the close.

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:04 pm

So you think you know it all? Guess what, I am a doctor and guess who I have trained to do 90% of my work: the staff which consists of people with high school diplomas and a few with college degrees. Are you aware that nurses are now able to train to become nurse anesthetists performing the identical work as anesthesiologists? You’ve missed the finer points of my argument: no one is suggesting EQUAL pay, just more equitable pay!

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:10 pm

If this follows the pattern of previous days – it should take off – but it seems to me of late, that the pattern has been one of headfakes on headfakes – this is one smart and agile bear we’re dealing with – I think we visit 818 today and see how it feels -

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

If you watch the DJ, you are staring at the hypnotist’s watch. Wanna watch something that matters, watch the comex have a run in December and default…

OuterBeltwayNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

RGE BrainTrust Conference Call AgendaCall starts: Wednesday November 19 at 09:00 U.S. ESTDuration: 1 hour8:45 – 9:00 Call in, announce yourself to the group. Dial this U.S. number: 218.339.4300Enter this access code: 882086# (don’t forget the pound sign)9:00 – 9:05 Establish conference call protocolsee reference materials below for protocol.9:06 – 9:10 RGE representative’s remarks (if RGE cares to make any)9:15 – 9:20 Establish the process for deciding our:Mission. Define our common ground. Vote on it now.Strategy. Priorities and plans – debate it on the blog, vote next meetingSubgroups. Which ones are necessary to execute the mission. Debate it on the blog, vote next meetingRefer to reference materials below for more detail.9:21 – 9:30 Vote on this proposed “common ground” mission statement:We are going to build and use grass-roots power to influence the evolution of our economy.9:30 – 9:45 Open mike. “My vision of what this organization could accomplish”. Moderator will solicit up to 3 presentations from the group.* 2 minutes to tell,* 3 minutes for Q & A9:46 – 9:50 Set time for next meeting. Nov 26th, or Dec 3?9:51 – 10:00 Presentation: Tools for rebuilding our economy from the bottom up.Presenter: OuterBeltway* 5 minutes to tell* 5 minutes for Q & A===== Reference Materials for First Conference Call =======1. Protocol for running a conference call• Moderator controls the “you-have-the-floor” baton• Speak only when you have the baton• Stay within your time allocation• Pass the baton between moderator and presenter• Pass the baton between presenter and interlocutor2. Decisions that build strong, effective organizationsMission. What is our strongly-held common groundGovernance. How do we set direction and allocate resources. Minimalist.Strategy. How do we:* Pick goals. Make plans. Allocate resources. Adapt to reality.* Accommodate diversity of interests while accomplishing the main group goalsSpecialization. What sub-groups are created based on need, interest, and commitmentCulture. How do we relate to one another, and to our external challengesInstitutional knowledge. How do we establish and maintain the core things that we all know about our situationIncentives. Why would people expend the time and energy to do the group’s work?Resources. How will we identify and acquire the time, energy, contacts, materials and tools we need to be powerful?3. Finding the common groundWhat we have in common* We are powerless. Evidence of this is the $700B bailout. It was an expensive, dumb idea that passed in spite of almost universal opposition.* We see big changes coming, and we don’t like what we see.* We don’t have the proper tools to influence the outcomes.* We are not poised to take advantage of the impending economic crisis.* We don’t currently have a strategy to change our situationWe will vote on this proposed mission statement:We are going to build and use grass-roots power to influence the evolution of our economy.4. Where we differOur differences are mainly in terms of which problems to attack, and in what order. Prioritization.One operational strategy is to build infrastructure that can be used at either the individual or the group level. We come together to build power and apply it according to our common interests, and we go our separate ways to do things at the individual or sub-group levels. It is possible to build such an organization.5. Sub-groupsHere are some possible topics to form sub-groups around. What sub-groups do you think are needed?Tools. What tools do we need to increase the group’s power?Institutional knowledge. What are the things we need to know in common?Economic forces. What are the main forces causing the economy to change?Debates or Speaker’s Bureau. Topics might include such things as:* What’s a valid stimulus plan, and how can it be paid for?* What are the main forces affecting the evolution of tomorrow’s economy?* How is our situation today different from 1930, and how is it the same?* What are the sociological forces that will impact the adaptation of Western economies to globalization and resource contention?Administration* Scheduling, promotion of events (calls, presentations, debates, etc.)* Scribe

Octavio RichettaNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:38 pm

From the previous thread:We are in crazy times.Yes, inflation, unemployment are probably [strike that] certainly higher than officially reported. Thus, US GDP, which is recorded in real terms, is and has been lower than we are told for quite a while now. In the long term, this affects company earnings growth rates which go hand-in-hand with GDP and thus stock valuations. It also cheats investors in TIPs who get shortchanged in their inflation-adjusted returns.Company profits despite the reforms that followed the Enron/MCI collapse continue to be manipulated. A good chunk of the managers in charge of companies are no more than a bunch of crooks and thieves that cheat and rob the stockholders (this is not an original, check the likes of Vanguard’s Boggle).The separation of ownership and management creates a conflict of interest in that managers have an incentive to rip off stockholders. Even in cases of managers who are significant stockholders (e.g., Martha Steward), lack of principles give them an incentive to cheat other stockholders. The rationale is as follows:If I own 50% of the company I manage and I stick stockholder with 100% of my expenses, even if they are not business related (like having the company driver and car drive me around on weekends while I shop for antiques), then I get a 50% subsidy from the stockholders; actually, I also get a subsidy from the taxpayer as business expenses are tax deductible. The few managers that are OK (i.e. claim to be honest), become dishonest as they claim they are forced to cheat in order to compete with their cheating counterparts (e.g., citi’s former CEO Sam Weil).So as not to be left behind, money managers also steal from investors through fees that approach 20% of earnings (yes close to 2% in assets which means 20% of earnings if their returns were around 10% which they are not). During the 20-year bull market(1980-2000) investors didn’t care about being robbed by management and money managers since they were all dancing to same beat at the same ecstasy-laced rave party courtesy of a market that provided an average of 15% annual returns (someone confirm that). But now that returns have been flat to negative for over 10 years, investors are waking up! If the situation does not change, the crookery of management and money managers will continue to hurt earnings and stock returns; so as the market realizes US businesses and money managers are not as efficient as they claim to be, investors will adjust valuations accordingly.So the investor is hit from all sides, company managers and money managers rob from them like there is no tomorrow. It is no wonder equity returns for the last 10 years are negative. Investors have been disappointed with stocks and may continue to be for a long time. IMO, they will not return to the happy 90s. So stocks may be cheap (even that is debatable with US real growth in the next 10 years of at most 2%yr) but they may stay cheap for a long time; such as they did for 50 years (roughly 1930 to 1980) look at this chart:http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=%5EDJI#chart2:symbol=^dji;range=my;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=off;source=undefinedSo as Hussman, Buffet, Gratham, Howard Marks, Jeremy Siegel, etc. salivate at the prospect of huge returns from here. They may be in for a surprise. perhaps the tortoise invested in safer fixed income will beat the turbocharged equity investing hare. I am not saying there will not be some merit to owning some equities as prices continue to decline and ECRI indicates things start to get better. But you have to hedge your bets by limiting your level of exposure to equities (for me that level is 30%). The bottom line here is that I am trying to present a contrarian point of view that IMO is as valid as the bullish case but which you will not read about in MSM.Check around, except for some currencies, MM funds, and US government bonds ALL asset classes year to date are in negative territory. Investing in 2008 has been like walking in a freaking WWII mine field. So yes investors investors are mad, and very disappointed.http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/pissed%20off

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

Here you go you idiot politicians!!! Proof you don’t know what the hell you are doing!!!!2:42 p.m.Modified IndyMac mortgages delinquent again, processor says

painterNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:52 pm

conference calls are fine, but what about some REAL civil unrest. I would be in the front line in faces down usa’s corporate military

John E.D.P. MalinNovember 18th, 2008 at 1:54 pm

To Anonymous:Petty moralistic statements yield little insight into complex financial-economic structures, institutions and governments.The mere fact that we can actually avert a ten year ‘Great Starvation’ event (our present mess is worse than the Great Depression by a factor of ten) is testimony to our intellectual achievements of the last fifty years in financial mtters.The mere fact that we have a professor of Roubini’s stature dictating tentative solutions in a holistic global frame is itself worthy of notice.Globally there are less than ten competent economists to unravel this mess by lucid academic papers securely rooted in astute arcane mathematical calculations drawn from Partial & Differential Equations and Algebraic Geometry.Pedestrian word language ["yak-yak"] cannot capture the subtlties and nuances of our present plight. It is mathematical language or numbers that capture physical reality alone!John E.D.P. Malin & James F.D.P. MalinCecilia, Louisiana 70521-0460Contact Information: InformaticaMalin@gmail.com

JimmyTheBankerNovember 18th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

If the SSO takes out $22.72, stocks will go into free-fall mode. That is why their is interest from certain “entities” to protect this level.

MorbidNovember 18th, 2008 at 2:47 pm

I agree. My crystal ball says that markets will rise for a while. Call it the Obi wave. God help the suckers who are drawn back in for the downside will be steady.

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 2:48 pm

Could you briefly explain what the SSO is and why they would go into freefall? I cannot make any sense of the volatility swings here!

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 2:49 pm

Oh come on! HP is going to single handedly save the economy! Who cares about all the other doom and gloom! HP is here to save the day!!GLOBAL MARKETS-Oil, stocks rise after HP tempers recession fearshttp://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idINN1847072620081118?rpc=44

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

SSO is the 2x’s levered S&P500 ETF. It tends to lead the S&P intra-day. LOLOL this is silly. Dow is now UP over 100 points as I type. So much for the theory there is no organized stance on protecting these key levels. Doesn’t mean they can stave off the inevitable, it just means they can put it off until their “friends” are out of harms way.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

Roubini’s estimates of houses falling by 40 percent at average is rather modest. I came here to NYC in 1997 and my uncle’s place as I remember was worth 200000. Now the same place is worth a million or around. Ridiculous. How much change in income (GDP) should a bubble which has inflated the value 4,5 times accomodate?

MandarinNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:00 pm

I’m going to beg off this call with regret, the rates to USA are punitively high here at least from my location. I’ll follow at second hand, and I wish all good luck.

CaponeNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:01 pm

this is / was wave 5 down of the most clear and concise 5 wave pattern. 1 – 4 and the start of 5 could probably be used in a text book. then since this is the united states of america, introduce the manipulators and wave 5 becomes bent, untrue, fabricated and insulting to truth.i wonder how the russians and chinese feel about the us ability to paint their charts while their respective indices have already crashed into oblivion. must be the God given right of the USA to rig the market.do you smell that? it is another day of decaying november options. another day of november cleared by the house – have to at a minimum clear the november puts off the table before going down.not sure what the books say on wave 1 -4 taking 7.5 days and wave 5 taking 6+ days to complete? throw out the books when you are watching complete and total distortion of truth by criminals.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:01 pm

Haha bulls remain bulls but they fail to see they are amid a crisis of a lifetime. They are short-sighted and finding the Buffets bottom might be and becoming savvy investors might be a good idea in normal stock market tumbles, but not this one. Then the followers will have to go back to omaha with thir inspiror.So far, Roubini’s estimates are modest and this might even turn out to be a depression. I suppose when Bush says that Bernake and Paulson approached him and told him that the crisis can unfold into something greater than the great depression, that says something. The question is, has the goverment averted a disaster or further prolonged it? Time will tell…

JimmyTheBankerNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

Volcker issues dire warning on slumpPaul Volcker, the former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, has warned that the economic slump has begun to metastasise after a shocking collapse in output over the past two months, threatening to overwhelm the incoming Obama administration as it struggles to restore confidence.By Ambrose Evans-PritchardLast Updated: 10:39PM GMT 17 Nov 2008″What this crisis reveals is a broken financial system like no other in my lifetime,” he told a conference at Lombard Street Research in London.”Normal monetary policy is not able to get money flowing. The trouble is that, even with all this [government] protection, the market is not moving again. The only other time we have seen the US economy drop as suddenly as this was when the Carter administration imposed credit controls, which was artificial.”His comments come as the blizzard of dire data in the US continues to crush spirits. The Empire State index of manufacturing dropped to minus 24.6 in October, the lowest ever recorded. Paul Ashworth, US economist at Capital Economics, said business spending was now going into “meltdown”, compounding the collapse in consumer spending that is already under way.Mr Volcker, an adviser to President-Elect Barack Obama and a short-list candidate for Treasury Secretary, warned that it is already too late to avoid a severe downturn even if the credit markets stabilise over coming months. “I don’t think anybody thinks we’re going to get through this recession in a hurry,” he said.He advised Mr Obama to tread a fine line, embarking on bold action with a “compelling economic logic” rather than scattering fiscal stimulus or resorting to a wholesale bail-out of Detroit. “He can’t just throw money at the auto industry.”

OuterBeltwayNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

Mandarin: Too bad. I was looking forward to your participation. When convenient, pls drop me a line at outerbeltway at yahoo dot com.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

Btw Obama seems convinced that goverment is going to solve every problem. Obama is like the good father to corporate America: He will criticize the same to win the election, he will blame the same for the greed, and yet Obama (like a good parent) would also give all the money he can to the same corporate America. It is kind of a love you-hate you relationship, but more love you eventually. What we need is someone who can just put a stop to the bail-outs and all the socialist agenda. The market players will sort it out eventually (why? because it will be in their interest to..if banks weren’t lending each other, after watching 5, 10 firms fail (and no goverment help) they will have to sit next to each other and start lending again because thats when they will realise that their survival is directly related to the next bank’s survival and so on…..it is almost like being in a jungle, a natural state of nature…would people steal, kill, and argue over resources without any laws guiding them? Nope, we wouldn’t be here if that were the case, because the same reasons that drive them to compete would make them align their interests — to understand that the others protection is important for their own protection– and form a social contract of sorts– because one would certainly kill someone to get the desired resources, but the same person would be well aware that he himself can be very will killed for the same resources right after and individual interest would be best preserved in the interest of all– even in a state of nature!! ). This will also make them be more considerate next time. It is like, you get a flu or a cold, and each time you get it, you take anti-biotics to relieve the pain. The problem is that the flu is able to attack the body because the body is weak and lacks natural antibodies and vitamins. Anti-biotics only make the body dependent on them to contain the cold. What is needed is vitamins in daily diet or the body to fight the flu itself.

CaponeNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

all this energy to keep the stock market up. at this point, the consumers are not going to go out and spend like they are supposed to regardless of a few points in the standard and ponzi 500 index and the dow jones industrial ponzi schemehouse prices down, stocks down – depressing isn’t it? the up moves presented as a production to the sheeple to make them feel better are like a dealer giving his crack head customer smaller and smaller doses over time and expecting him to get highBen and Hank, I sincerely hope you are enjoying yourselves getting pummeled in front of Congress regularly and undoubtedly being highly stressed most days and nights. Perhaps what comes around goes around and your utter disregard for the integrity of a true MARKET, that is M A R K E T, specifically the equity markets over the past few years has come back to haunt you as it should gentlemen.

PeterJBNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:23 pm

What is on the line – and they know it – where the public is yet to get to this point – is the integrity and competence of “leadership”. Leadership which includes political, bureaucratic, economic, financial, banking and corporate has failed – totally and in fact, as a fraud;the cure, to be sure, to be sure – is the public purse, taxation (of all types) and to embark onto a fascist state in the desperate hope that they turn this tidal wave around – “trust” (in “leadership”); it will not….sooo, everything will be thrown in (includes deckchairs and everything belonging to the public (you know – “them”) because this “leadership, are fighting for their very lives; their integrity is on the line; it is shot, and they have none left; they have lived a complete lie on the hog and its bellies and have successfully fooled the public (again / still); but, their end has come as the pain bites in with public reality. [On the Exxon Valdez, the scum (public) row for free cigarettes and for the moment are happy).For "leadership" this is desperation and as Congress recently voted against their electorate and for "leadership" - they know that their time has come. When will the Press or MSM turn of them? - they already have.Joseph Chamberlain, made in 1904 to a smug group of his country's financiers: "Granted that you are the clearinghouse of the world, [but] are you entirely beyond anxiety as to the permanence of your great position? . . . Banking is not the creator of our prosperity but is the creation of it. It is not the cause of our wealth, but it is the consequence of our wealth.”Do you really think that this is cyclic? Do you think that this is a “conspiracy”?Best that you consider that this complete global economic collapse has been brought about by simple stupidity and a total lack of ethics and all that hangs off it. Talking of hanging… I ‘wouldn’t like to be in a “leadership” (Joe Sslick) position in the coming days…. but “revolution” is sure in the air and is being journalized to a coming norm.Ho hum

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

One of the academic contributors on RGE suggested direct Treasury purchases of stock as an anti-depression measure. Non-accountability as good as invites this open secret. Incidentally, by law the Chinese government can directly buy stock. My sense is that they tried this last summer but it was ineffective. However my sense of the market has been that it is always rigged against the individual investor: these tend to behave and react en masse. The large brokers know their positions, follow their trades, know their pain threshold. Often it’s as if when I enter an order a bell goes off somewhere and without the deepest pockets and nerves beyond steel, it’s a guaranteed win for the other side. The worst is the interbank FX market with 90:1 leverage. Pickpockets pure and simple.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:32 pm

What to do?They — Buffet, Hussman, Grantham, Comstockfunds.com, et. al — say stocks are fairly valued now. Alan Ableson says they are still overvalued. Our professor says they are grossly overvalued?My head is spining.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:35 pm

4:32 p.m.[FNM] Fannie Mae shares closed below $1 over 30 trading days4:31 p.m.[FNM] Fannie Mae told by NYSE it doesn’t meet listing standard

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

From previous thread,”The greatest shortcomingof the human race is ourinability to understandthe exponentialfunction.” – Prof.Al BartlettDr. Albert Bartlett: Arithmetic, Population and Energy[Transcribed from a speech]It’s a great pleasure to be here, and to have a chance just to share with you some very simple ideas about the problems we’re facing. Some of these problems are local, some are national, some are global.They’re all tied together. They’re tied together by arithmetic, and the arithmetic isn’t very difficult. What I hope to do is, I hope to be able to convince you that the greatest shortcoming of the human race is our inability to understand the exponential function.Well, you say, what’s the exponential function?This is a mathematical function that you’d write down if you’re going to describe the size of anything that was growing steadily. If you had something growing 5% per year, you’d write the exponential function to show how large that growing quantity was, year after year. And so we’re talking about a situation where the time that’s required for the growing quantity to increase by a fixed fraction is a constant: 5% per year, the 5% is a fixed fraction, the “per year” is a fixed length of time. So that’s what we want to talk about: its just ordinary steady growth.Well, if it takes a fixed length of time to grow 5%, it follows it takes a longer fixed length of time to grow 100%. That longer time’s called the doubling time and we need to know how you calculate the doubling time. It’s easy.You just take the number 70, divide it by the percent growth per unit time and that gives you the doubling time. So our example of 5% per year, you divide the 5 into 70, you find that growing quantity will double in size every 14 years.Well, you might ask, where did the 70 come from? The answer is that it’s approximately 100 multiplied by the natural logarithm of two. If you wanted the time to triple, you’d use the natural logarithm of three. So it’s all very logical. But you don’t have to remember where it came from, just remember 70.I wish we could get every person to make this mental calculation every time we see a percent growth rate of anything in a news story. For example, if you saw a story that said things had been growing 7% per year for several recent years, you wouldn’t bat an eyelash. But when you see a headline that says crime has doubled in a decade, you say “My heavens, what’s happening?”OK, what is happening? 7% growth per year: divide the seven into 70, the doubling time is ten years. But notice, if you want to write a headline to get people’s attention, you’d never write “Crime Growing 7% Per Year,” nobody would know what it means. Now, do you know what 7% means?End////////- TobyIf you would put population growth in a time line, you will se the graph of an exponential function, energy consumption, US debt, minerals, fish, farming land etc etc, the list is long. They all look exponential to me, and guess what, it goes fast in the end.If you then understand the our current monetary system is based upon continous growth is does not take a geniuos to figure out that it is not sustainable.The question is when and that I hope someone could be more specific about.Which exponetial graph is the most critical one and when do it hit the roof?Who, but the grass roots can drive us towards a “steady-state” economy?/Toby

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:42 pm

For the love of God: this crazy, unprecedented volatility is happening to the most stable and respected stock market in the world: S&P/Dow. How in the world can you have over a 400 point swing in the last hour of trading ON NO NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Is it any wonder that the rest of the world doesn’t trust the US financial system anymore or any media financial expert who tells us there is no market manipulation!!!This is the absolute antithesis (opposite) of a free market system!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:47 pm

“You want to play the market, Charlie? You want to gamble? OK, go ahead, make some hay. But not too much. You see, they don’t like it when you make hay off them.” –JP MarquandYou can feel it coming. In the end “they” will drop shares until they have picked up every last certificate for ten cents on the dollar. This is how dynasties are founded and empires are built. It’s just theft, and we collude with it in the hope of getting rich. They inherit the world, we inherit the wind.

JimmyTheBankerNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:49 pm

If you study the tape closely, it is not hard to figure out which days they are going to close up and which they are going to close down. Watch the volume. If we hit the “magic hour” and volume is trailing the previous day, they sell the market off. This gives the illusion that the market was down, but on less volume than an up day. If the volume is greater than the previous down day, they close it up. This give the impression of strong buying on an up day. In old conspiracy days, they called this “tape painting”. The last two days are perfect examples. However, the key is market internals and the daily traading range, follow them, you know the truth!

RedCreekNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

Anyone having a few US$ left to spare, you might want to consider buying Niall Ferguson’s latest book “The Ascent of Money” (2008).p.3 “Corporate Finance was the indispensable foundation of both the Dutch and British empires, just as the triumph of the US in the twentieth centurey was inseparable from advances in insurance, mortgage finance and consumer credit. Perhaps, too, it will be a financial crisis that signals the twilight of American global primacy.”p.3 “It was financial folly, a self-destrictoive cycle of defaults and devaluations, that turned Argentina from the world’s sixth-richest country in the 1880s into the inflation-ridden basket case of the 1980s.”p.10 “It is not too much to say that in mid-2008 we witnessed the inflationary symptoms of a world war without the war itself.”p.29 “What the conquistadores failed to understand is that money is a matter of belief, even faith: belief in the person paying us; belief in the person issuing the money he uses or the or the institution that honors its cheques or transfers. Money is not metal. It is trust inscribed.”

JimmyTheBankerNovember 18th, 2008 at 3:55 pm

Today’s internals on a Dow up 150 points…Volume up over yesterdayAdvancers-1306Decliners-2325Up Volume-2,871Down vloume-3,807New Highs-8New lows-654.Also, the S&P made a lower high for the day AND a lower low vs yesterday. All bearish action.See how the up day on strong volume can mask what is taking place under the surface…Be careful with your capital.

Detlef GuertlerNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

@iNnOsInZ:YOU are the media – at least part of it. And, don`t expect mainstream media to cover a story called “some dozen of Roubini bloggers hold a conference call to discuss the future of the global economy”. The news will be fit to print, if we DO (or publish) something.@MA et al.: Better than an acronym would be a brand name: What about “The Roubini Gang”?

CNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:01 pm

I frequently hear of only the last few years referred to as the bubble years. I don’t buy it. The bull in real estate has been running for a long time. When I was looking for a house in 1998-99, I gave up on a resale and bought new construction. Even back in 1998-99, the resales were sold almost as soon as the sign went up. From the time I put a deposit on my house to the time I settled, I was up by a significant amount. That’s not a normal market. The market has a long way to fall it gets to rational levels.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:07 pm

I watched the video and I felt that Thomas Zimmerman was trying to convince himself as to why the housing market should not fall that much further. I don’t see the flippers and investors as helping to put a floor under the market the way he does. Someone bought an REO in my neighborhood, a “nice” stable neighborhood. The flipper keeps lowering his price to get a sale. It’s hurting value in the development.

regiomontanusNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:11 pm

Jingle MailPiling on the debtsFor a granite counter topAnd cherry cabinetsHas turned into a flopThe bankers get bailed outWhich makes their spirits brightThe people hold the bagWill they put up a fight?Oh, jingle mail, jingle mail,The keys are on the wayIt’s no fun to own a houseWhose mortgage I can’t payJingle mail, jingle mail,Jingle all the wayIt’s no fun to own a houseWhose mortgage I can’t paySeveral years agoAlan Greenspan was our guideAnd soon Miss Fanny MaeWas seated by our sideThe ARM was lean and lankWith a teaser rate to bootCollateralized by the bankSystemic risk was mootOh, jingle mail, jingle mail,…

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:15 pm

Nobody knows, yes we had borrowed to much from the future and todays bailouts feels a bit artificell, but every move down in markets had to be consolidated (we talking 50%) downmove. MA200 32% away not seen sins great dep.Some great companys has good value. Even if I belive professor Nouriel has it all right and thank you for sharing your thoughts, timing is …

BrettNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

Nice post, Jimmy. I believe you can also learn a lot about the trend by following the individual stocks in dow as opposed to only following the average. It’s not a monolith. If the dow goes from 9500, down to 9000, then to 8500, then back to 9000, in the end, almost all of the 30 dow stocks will be a different price the second time the dow hit 9K than the first.

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:37 pm

Just more unpatriotic negativity from liberals who question the leaders of the REAL American party, and hate freedom.

OuterBeltwayNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

iNnOsInZ: I hope you’re planning to attend the conf call. You have excellent organizational instincts.

BrettNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:48 pm

When a market bubble initially breaks, invariably buyers come in under the false impression that they’re are getting a bargain. This buying supports prices for a while until reality sets in.Look at a chart of the NASDAQ during the tech bubble. There was a nice bounce when the market had fallen ~25% from its high. Then, the bottom fell out.

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 4:56 pm

What do you think of buying the short ETF (SH or SDS) while it is above the 200 day moving average and then switch to long ETF (SPY) when that is above the 200 day moving average. I looked at prior charts and it seems to consistently outperform. It can’t be that easy can it? What do you all think?

tutterfrutNovember 18th, 2008 at 5:30 pm

Nothing of all this technicalities.For me it’s like this: I stick my righthand middle finger in my left nostril and my left handpinky in my right ear. With my tongue I try to reach my right nostril while I dial my mum’s phone number with my left big toe. The days I succeed from the first attempt and my mum understands what I’m saying, the markets close higher, if not we end down. The day my father picks up the phone, the market crashes…

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

Assorted voices on this blog have suggested that America’s future would be better served without as much consumer greed, or excessive use of valuable resources. Among the problems, they say, is over consumption. Some even have suggested that Americans, in fact, now have almost everything they need, and so to add anything additional would be excessive. To this, I’d like to add my analysis to this “slippery slope of gluttony,” a gluttony, it’s said, that’s pulling America down to destruction.What, I ask, is ambition if not but to do something or to be something, or…just to look nice?That said, fashion is worthless. Wouldn’t it be efficient if we wore uniforms as in Mao’s China – unisex uniforms because they would be so much easier to manufacture? And couldn’t they be made of some kind of peasant cloth, instead of expensive fabric — dark blue cotton, say, for techs; standard green for the military; gray versions for administrative and clerical workers and Congress? America would save billions.Once we toss the fashion, why is it that we’re all interested in this variety of foods, all these different kinds of preparations? Wouldn’t it be easier if we went to a healthy mix of inexpensive food that everyone could be provided? Look at the money we could save without supermarkets and delis! With proper research, something like sea rations could be made to be somewhat tasteful. It might be difficult to accept at first, but, again, we would save billions, and we would have so much more disposable incomeThe biggest savings of all would be to cut out travel and vacations. Think of it, the savings on fuel and metal and motels! if we simply took on more games at home, instead of engaging in expensive travel and expensive movie going . The entertainment /travel industry costs the U.S. billions, right? It’s ludicrous to spend that kind of money. Think of the savings: no car, no freeways, no high-rise parking lots, no parking fees, fewer highway patrolmen…And, because we’ve saved billions, we can provide all the people who’ve lost their jobs with stipends. Look at the money we’ve saved on clothes alone! If a normal middle class woman didn’t buy shoes for just one year, she could buy uniforms for at least 10 other people.Let’s see, what did I leave out? Oh, yes!! What is the first thing you see when you walk through the front doors of every major department store — everywhere? Cosmetics! 18 different kinds of lipsticks! It’s impossible to even get to the overpriced clothing without going through cosmetics! Don’t you think that ‘s excessive? Besides, everyone knows a woman is more attractive in her natural state.And, oh my, the culture class! Well, who’s going to pay for the pouty girl’s Prius when her only job is puffing on the oboe in the city symphony? But it’s not all highbrow waste is it? Just who is that happy nutcase who owns all the Madonna posters…where’s all that CD dough going that kids are extracting from permissive Boomer parents? Museums, paint and canvas, Chinese porcelain and Rigoletto siphon bucks from the swells the same as the Friday night pint takes away ours. Enough!So, away with the Hummers and the McMansions! Away, I say. It’s disgusting! Americans have way too much. Look in your closet. Because you’re overeating, you can’t even get into half the things you’ve got because you’re too fat. If you don’t overeat, a single uniform could probably suffice for the rest of your life. For those people who have to eat two sea rations, expandable uniforms!I didn’t even mention alcohol and spirits. Look at the holidays! The best thing to do is close down all the bars and whiskey merchants – that industry alone is into us for billions. Isn’t that excessive, to have a glass of wine with your sea rations? If you stop buying wine, the guys with the vineyards would go out of business, but you can subsidize them with the money you’ve saved wearing an expandable uniform.All the valuable resources saved from fashion and deli foods et al. could go to the poor, or to education, or to save the planet (God forbid it should go back to the taxpayers!)…Do we need dogs? Eliminate the dog industry! Why should we have to worry about poisoned dog food coming in from China? Euthanize the whole dog population and pocket the money. We’re talking here not only about pet hospitals, but pet cemeteries! This is extreme excess.And, hey! if you want to talk extreme excess, how about all that sports expense? France has thousands of kinds of cheese, but America has more different athletic shoes than France has cheeses. We have shoes for “walking” and shoes for “running.” And the NFL? What’s up with that? Superbowl? More like Superwaste! Think about the man-hours and the few woman-hours down the drain on that afternoon! And don’t get me started about baseball. For most of the year — can you believe it? – these guys play every day! And, for the older set, not only has golf provided every imaginable trinket, but, would you believe, it’s come out with a UroClub, the newest club for the prostrate-challenged golfer! Looks like a seven iron but holds a liter of liquid. There’s certainly savings here.The bottom line is that we’re talking excess, and you’ll always have some people trying to slip out to buy some new frock or something, so it won’t work without enforcement. You’ve got to watch out for the abusers: you’ve got to have informers. You need a number on that uniform. If you see someone out trying to barbecue steaks, and if you can’t read that uniform with your binoculars, well, you can’t serve your country, can you? Luckily, we don’t have far to look for volunteers; and we don’t need volunteers to look out for everything. We can have fashion volunteers, gourmet volunteers…Like the pigs in “Animal Farm,” volunteers who are going into enforcement need to be paid a little more for that, of course, and need additional freedoms for their jobs. And, instead of living in the barn, of course, they get to live in houses…THE LESSON: People who have suggestions for how other people should live and who say that we all have enough, obviously are saying that you and I have enough, not that they have enough. And that how we are spending our money and occupying our time, is not important, and, if possible, should be prohibited. Waste, of course, is one thing and should be eliminated at every opportunity. But judging, and then controlling, how another person uses the produce from his labor, is the beginning of government tyranny. Socialism would offer an equality of position that would soon leave no one anything to possess. IMO, this is excess.

Neil GillespieNovember 18th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

Having many things is quite acceptable, if you can afford them. If you use other people’s money too much of the time, living a life of Riley with a really bad debt to net worth ratio, and you get in a position where you can’t pay it back, you are a minus sign in the GDP records. You literally SUCK things OUT of the economy. You reduced someone else’s wealth. You SUCK.I don’t care to pay taxes to support people that SUCK.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

Leave it to you, Capone,to pierce through the fog and put things in their proper perspective. And well put, as usual.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 6:18 pm

And, perhaps, just perhaps, we need a little revolution, just to clear the air, just so we can breathe a little freedom again.

dr. wombatNovember 18th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

Has anyone got suggestions? Here’s mine.In the event of a mortgage default, the contract sets out conditions for what should happen, that is foreclosure. Rather than void those contracts, which means endlessly bailing out banks and/or borrowers, I propose enforcement of the contract. However, a new contract can be implemented at that point: a lease with an option to purchase. The foreclosed borrower acquires a right to lease the home at a ‘market rate’, with an obligation to maintain the property. The now-tenant also has the right to purchase the property within a specified period of time let’s say 20 years) at a specified price (the prior mortgage balance, possibly with a credit for part of the lease payment). The advantages are obvious (continuing to live in home, opportunity to build credit rating, ‘enforced’ saving, not rewarding speculators, reducing housing stock on market)The lender/lessor deducts depreciation and interest costs (along with other expenses) against the lease income, likely resulting in a tax loss, which is carried back against previous taxable income (partially covering the loss). The lender loses something, but now has a cash paying asset on the books.The Govt makes it work by allowing double-depreciation on distressed properties and other incentives. Bail out money is transferred to the IRS to cover lender claims.Over time, the market gradually corrects–I assume it make take many years, but the proposal takes properties off the market and should help to stabilize it. People who can afford a mortgage will buy, the others rent, which is what should have happened in the first place….

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

I’ll go with the one who doesn’t have a stake in the outcome and whose evaluations don’t suffer potential prejudice because of his holdings, i.e. Dr. Nouriel Roubini. And I think that would also include Alan Abelson.

randyNovember 18th, 2008 at 6:43 pm

I have bought SDS at 87 and still hold it. I expect the S&P to continue down further. Then, I’ll sell and go the other way!

AfANovember 18th, 2008 at 6:48 pm

What do you mean? SPY has persistently been below and SDS above their 200 MA since January. You have had to make that decision – to buy SDS – back in January (at the latest) and more importantly, stick to it – 5 months later you would have lost all your paper gains.For any entry point after that date, your “strategy” would be useless and indecisive – e.g. middle of May where MA barely touches SPY but does not cross it BUT you wouldn’t have known that at that time, if you follow your strategy=buy SPY in mid May you have, in the best cases, gained nothing.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:05 pm

I disagree. It does work. Look at any long term chart on Yahoo. If you buy SDS or SPY when they are above their 200 DMA and sell when below you outperform the market (which these days is not saying much).

AfANovember 18th, 2008 at 7:10 pm

For a (T minus 1 second) I thought you were one dangerous guest. I agree with you that trying to erase differences and diversity in “nature” is a toxic dream.The “rule”, according to me, is simple; people, in general, ought to not have the “possibility” to live on the fruit of the work of someone else, without his/her will or knowledge, no matter who is that someone (aka social justice). That is quite different from; all people should live within their means. And even light years from what you described.In general: because not all people should/can comply, for different reasons, the important thing is that the social tissue is balanced.Ought to: where are the cops?Not have the possibility: because if the system, by design, allows people, by altering their culture and norms, to exploit/benefit from that, they would (cheap unregulated debt-based consumption).without his/her will or knowledge: there is no problem if the someone give up his/her right to consume/call back if she is consent – kids do itno matter who is that someone: another compatriot, a foreigner, or 2 generations from now.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:16 pm

SDS was about 55 in jan (a buy as it went above 200 DMA). May to June you would be out of sds (below 200 DMA) Then back in to date where SDS is now 101! Seems to work to me. As for SPY looks like it was below 200DMA so your out of spy while your neighbor cries. Am I reading the charts wrong? Does seem too good to be true.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:17 pm

liberals who … hate freedom

hmmm…I thought it was communists who hated freedom, not “liberals”.Which by the way brings me to the issue of how in America people seem to call nearly anyone they do not agree with a “liberal”. Thus you could even end up with the oxymoronic expression of referring to those “liberal communists”:-)I guess the point is about what is the politician(s) liberal about?Traditionally liberal of course was the opposite of “conservative” (someone who wanted to conserve the current order of things). That would make liberal someone who would like to change the current order of things.

AfANovember 18th, 2008 at 7:23 pm

The Japanese also want to throw money at their citizens.Do one has to be a citizen to get “stimulated”?Why didn’t G20 adopt this; a global stimulus plan?$100 for every man, woman & kid – dead or alive – dog, cat, living cell, chair … or just take the requirements from a 2003 lending underwriting standards … maybe this way they can spur some spending and growth.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

Since this current market has been in the tank (about last 1.5 years) SPY has almost always been below 200DMA. The rule would have saved you from bad losses. On top of that, instead of sitting in cash during this time period, had you been in the inverse SH or SDS for that same time except for about 3 or 4 months (while SDS was below its 200 DMA) you would have done great. Try any SPY or SH stock chart 3 months or more on yahoo and then overlap the 200DMA except for some few short periods you gain.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:36 pm

Most people who loan out their own money would be incredibly careful who they loan it to especially if they worked really hard for that money so with that in mind I suggest you ask these questions:Who created the money that was loaned out? What sacrafice was made to create that money? Who was underwritting the money lent and what was their motivation? Did they really have anything to loose by making poor decisions?The poor idiots who borrowed this money were sheeple being led to the slaughter to blame the pion who took the loan out and couldn’t afford to pay it back really misses the point entirely, it misses what maybe the biggest heist in history and a heist that has gone on for almost 100 years and continues to this day.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:43 pm

One way or another deflation must occur that can happen through creditors forgiving debt or through foreclosure or bankruptcy. It can also happen through creative ways as you suggest as long as the net result is in fact a loss of value. The creditor or borrower has to take a loss period how that happens is now the great debate.

Guest-o-RamaNovember 18th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

Are you serious? If you’re a single mother nobody is home with the kids! The kids are at school or daycare and in before and after school programs which are costing you an arm and a leg! Only the married moms get to stay home and then only a few at least here in the good ole USA. If you’re lucky and dad’s involved you get a few weeknights off and some weekends and maybe some child support. More often than not you pay him child support to be involved or go it alone. This is why I don’t have kids. No safety net for moms around here. Women and children impoverished through divorce. Its not pretty.

Guest-o-RamaNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:01 pm

That’s the story. US corporations sitting on mountains of cash will spend us out of recession. They will be our saviors. But wait, CEOs say they need bailing too. Hmm who to believe-bullish media or greedy corporate giants??? I’ll take door # 3.

CHRIS DAVSINovember 18th, 2008 at 8:09 pm

The moment the Feds come to the inevitable rescue with a mortgage relief plan the above scenario oes out the window

Guest-O-RamaNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:16 pm

The Smart Money (who perhaps now should be downgraded to only Above Average Money) is getting into the S&P the only guaranteed good day left this week before everyone else piles into cover their shorts. Also Budweiser is gone from S&P (sold overseas with the rest of America) so they had to find a replacement. The mantra now is raise short term cash for next week when its all going down in the great death spiral. Roubini’s crystal ball (I got it on Sale and SKS) tells me next Monday and all of next week we’re heading toward the big one. Call it Smackdown-O-Rama… Not only will it be post-options expiration, almost always a bad week but also U.S.A. Thanksgiving and folks aren’t going to want to be long in stocks for the holiday (as if we’ll have anything to be thankful for other than the week being over). Then the Friday after Thanksgiving in the US -Black Friday when everyone goes holiday shopping at midnight and retailers offer all kinds of crazy deals will disappoint. Last year was bad. This year it will be crushing.Brace yourselves people. They cannot keep Christmas from coming but they can reposes Rudolph and the Christmas Escalade (I mean Sleigh) and keep your Santa Rally at bay…

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

Something very strange (at least to me) is going on in Mexico. I know of several cases in which people who have defaulted on their credit card account have been given an offer by the bank to have their negative balance set to zero if they make a relatively small payment (10% of their balance by BBV Bancomer, 20% by Inversa) in the short term (a week or ten days). While I have absolute evidence of this only in regard to the banks that I mention, I suspect that the practive is widespread here.The procedure is this: The account holder goes to the bank and makes a payment of the specified amount (this is called a partial payment). Then he calls the bank (in the case of Inversa) or a special judicial firm (in the of Bancomer) and gives the transaction number, time and date of the payment, and other such data. Then he is told by the bank represetative that in twenty days the balance of his account will be set to zero.I suspect that if a bank has a large percentage of credit card account defaults, it will affect the banks rating, so the banks are doing the above to lower the number of their delinquent accounts to protect their ratings. I also suspect that this is not a bank administrative function–it is part of a judical process, and the zeroing of the account is actually done in accordance with a judge’s order.

WiseGuyNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:23 pm

That almost sounds a bit like the gamber’s fallacy.Assuming that someone who has made money in the market will continue to make money is a bit like betting that the next coin flip will come up tails simply because the previous 10 coin flips have come up tails.However, even that analogy isn’t very accurate. The gambler’s fallacy is based upon a fair coin being tossed. Obviously, a billionaire has options and capabilities that few of us have available when playing the markets. The billionaire’s coin is loaded in his/her favor.

AnonymousNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:26 pm

Words of wisdom on excess: What shall it profit a man who inherits the whole world, yet loses his soul? We all have the free will to choose light or darkness!

CHRIS DAVISNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

Dear Anonymous,How old are you? Ever heard of the Panic of 1907? Tulip Bulbs? Tech Wreck? South Sea Bubble? Nikkei Dow 40000?? Crash of 1893?? OPEC crash of 1974-5?? Credit Immobilier??Since when is the free market system as soporific as an episode of Barney the Purple Dinosaur??

Guest-o-RamaNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:38 pm

Most of the Suckers suck because they had too little to start with. Generally you don’t just go out and get in debt from rabid overconsumption. Read the NYT article today on veterans coming back here and their economic woes. Go to war, get bonked on the head, your wife quits her job to help you and you wait a year to get disability payments, return to your tiny little community without economic opportunity for your high school educated self which is why you entered the military in the first place, try to get a job, end up with your house under water delivering pizza and your savings all gone etc…Its not a pretty picture and I’d gladly pay for people who were busy saving my ass.Also credit card default is most likely for young and for people who total monthly payment is unmanageable. We changed the rules this past year on everyone. When I was a grad student I had multiple cards maxed out and still had really low payments. Sure I was never going to get them paid off (OK I did with a HELOC in the good old days) but I was in no danger of becoming a SUCKER because I met my monthly obligations. Plenty of people start businesses that way and its risky but debt used responsibly has the potential to add to the economy. Its when the rules change after the fact and/or things come along like illness, divorce or death that the vulnerable really get screwed…Maybe I’m just a big softie but I even feel a bit bad for GM. Why do we need these giant vehicles that get crap mileage? Because if you have 2 kids and they have 1 friend you need a third row of seating so the kids legally can ride in the car. Maybe they should have seen the peak oil handwriting on the wall but was it really peak oil or was it speculators with bubble money riding the next bubble up up up and screwing the whole economy into a recession. Was it GM’s fault nobody could get credit to buy vehicles??? They with their 0% financing were the big heros in this country after 9-11 that got everything moving. Personally I ADORE my husband’s Suburban and HATE my Honda Element. The Suburban holds up to all kinds of abuse. The damn Element has cost me and our insurance policy $6000.00 since it was purchased in repairs from minor dings and its only 1 year old and has paint peeling.Sorry for the diatribe but I get sick of folks blaming the victims…

CaponeNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

God Bless you! I will send this link to everyone I know… BTW – Bernanke was asked directly about this in a congressional hearing or committee meeting that was aired live on CNBC. WTF ! ! ! ! If I am not mistaken, Berdunskee acknowledged it live on CNBC right ? ? ? ? ! ! ! !

Guest-o-ramaNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

Buffet buys highly diversified preferred. Joe6Pack buys highly undiversified common. There’s a big difference. Preferred is probably a much better deal but common? Not so much. Not to mention that picking a few stocks here and there out of the thousands available is like finding a needle in a haystack and you have to limit yourself to just a few and jump in all at once if you want to avoid fees. Plus all the household names have already made their moves…Joe6Pack’s only hope is to buy funds and not get too greedy. I know. I’m Joe.

Anthony D'AmatoNovember 18th, 2008 at 8:53 pm

If the government buys or otherwise takes over any mortgage, does your crystal ball show how the government will enforce the mortgage if the mortgagor defaults? By sending in the National Guard? By rotating troops in from Iraq to aim their mortars and bazookas against people’s front porches? Will the TV cameras be invited to these events?If your answer is that it is too politically risky for the government to enforce mortgages, then every homeowner will stop payments and live for free for ever after.

Guest-o-RamaNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:03 pm

I really adored the lets not pay social security taxes for a year idea (not my idea-someone mentioned it on NPR but I missed his name). That would give us ALL a break, give states more income to tax so maybe they wouldn’t go under and would have a way to pay unemployment for those who will need it. And the “responsible” people could feel like they were getting something other than ripped off and anyone with debt could use it to pay it down.Not sure how much money we’re talking there or what that would do to current social security payments but since social security is broken anyway maybe it could just be broke a year earlier…

bdNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:10 pm

Disagreement: I don’t think 1 in 5 people underwater on their house will walk away. I think NR is under estimating the determination and pride of the consumer, we aren’t Wall Street! I do agree that his estimates as to how many will be under water is true, but it doesn’t mean they would jump ship. I put 20% down on my house in 04, I still have equity. But if things became depressed further, and I didn’t, I wouldn’t go anywhere. Where would I go and how would I get a loan? If his predictions do come true, then we should be buying up Real Estate funds like its the last loaf of bread in town, because they will be full of tenants who can’t get a home loan. why do you think credit card debt is so high, because will go thru all cost to stay in their home. So why would that change, unless they financially can’t afford which is a different subject and not what Nouriel is referring to. He is simply saying if people get wind they owe more then the current price, they will walk. No way, not just to walk. I would think more like 2-5% might walk, and maybe 10% can’t afford and can’t work with their banks. So what does the losses look like with 5-10% foreclosure?

CaponeNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:11 pm

apparently i am not supposed to ever make money in the market. even though i am fairly well with the turns of late – WRONG shorts amazingly… hint the stocks that are $10 or $11 or almost 20% above the lows of October even though we are at the lows again. The stocks that everyone seems to have forgotten were down 10 or 11 in two days in October… even f ing MO is back at its October lows… – not my SHORTShaving said that, i really hope others particularly those here for a long time can actually through better selection, patience, discipline, common sense, etc. profit substantially from the coming days weeks…here is my discounted (based on above confession) take – the dollar index on October 10th spiked a couple of points. if this market were to roll over either this week or golly gee maybe next week after the house clears the table of november puts, the dollar index may well see another mini- spike. this one will take it to around 90ish. this is approaching a resistance level from a few years back. if this coming decline in equities takes the beloved commodities with it, there is a decision to be made if you are in a position to redeploy capital. with the DOW at 6,500 ish and the S&P at 650 to 700 AND the dollar index near resistance, i have to recommend in my humble opinion putting bids in down below on COMMODITY NAMES and commodities – even if this is only a near term low and a several month trade, the relatively strong bounce / several month rally should come from commodities and the entry levels could be much lower than even now. if this dollar resistance actually holds – there could be a substantial tail wind to the commodity bounce as compared to other investments made with the DOW at 6,500… IMHO this would be a several week maybe month trade and not really any longer than that…from the desk of an amateur, draw your own conclusions

KJ FoehrNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:18 pm

Living sustainably doesn’t require communism and government tyranny. It simply means using resources wisely and living within our financial means. We can do this by making wise decisions as individuals, not by government decree. You still have the right to live a selfishly materialistic lifestyle, but if most of us continue to live that way then I believe we threaten our very existence, both as a nation and as a species.Who survives the winter, the grasshopper who enjoys its freedom to the fullest in the moment, or the ant who works hard to save food for the future? Is the ant foolish to limit its freedom by working more to prepare for the future? Or is it really expanding its freedom by enabling it to survive long after the grasshopper has died?Where is the grasshopper’s freedom when it no longer has the resources to survive in winter? It has no freedom then; it has no choice but to die.IMO, we have been living like grasshoppers in this country for too long, and now winter is approaching: it is time we begin to live more wisely.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:20 pm

Someone should try and capture this for YouTube before they remove it. It’s like a newspaper report on UFOs from the Roswell era in the 1940s.

AfANovember 18th, 2008 at 9:25 pm

Buying SDS while above the 200 MA or Buying SPY when above the 200 MA is the same decision. On paper, it works perfectly – but to execute it, on the long run, it is not necessarily that “outperforming”. You would have missed most of the gains. Remember that when it is still at the making, a turning point is not clearly that recognizable – it could easily be a “false” signal.If you started this strategy with the SPY, since 1993 – going long SPY whenever its MA crosses from below and short whenever MA crosses from above – by automatically executing a trade at the price of the next day whenever the closing price of the previous day crosses the MA, you would have realized a return of 221.56% – against a buy-and-hold return, over the same period of ~90%.OK, you win. However, the thing with this specific data set is that it works very fine whenever a trend is very clear like during the bull market of 98 and the bear of 08-XX where it yields 2 outsized gains. During the rest, the strategy loses more than it gains. I am sure that if you try it on longer horizons it will come out flat with the market – assuming that you don’t know a sever bear or roaring bull market is coming.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:35 pm

would you play specific commodities or ETFs focused on those commodities? Copper, Oil, Gold, Agriculture — where would your focus be please?

Average JaneNovember 18th, 2008 at 9:45 pm

There was an update to this blurb–the Japanese voters don’t want the money. Found it on Mish’s blog. How d’ya like them apples?

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Thankfully, what you write is still tongue-in-cheek for most Americans, but, sadly, was a reality for those peoples forced to live beneath the iron curtain and the iron fist of the USSR, founded in 1923 and dissolved December of 1991 – nearly two-thirds of the 20th century. The standard of living that Americans enjoy and take for granted as bequeathed to the people “by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” and by the Constitution of the United States given them by their Founding Fathers, has yielded a cornucopia of plenty — as millions work together as stewards of the land and its resources, collectively, in their own best interests. That is the miracle of free enterprise, of the right to property, of representative government, of freedom under God. But that structure is weakening from exploitation by the few at the expense of the many.It is the duty of all Americans who value freedom, IMO, to understand their history and to understand what made America unique, and what made her great and why she was founded as a republic and not a democracy. The very things you’ve mentioned in your parody that most of the people in Soviet Russia never saw — fashion, a supermarket of foods, travel and vacations, cosmetics and perfumes and jewelry, symphonies and music and television and movies, private homes and apartments and, yes, Hummers and McMansions, and holiday parties and cocktails and gifts, and pets and golf and fishing and NFL and running shoes and party frocks and steaks and wine and even UroClubs, education and job opportunites, and the many things you didn’t mention — have been denied most of mankind because of the corruption of power by the few. Unfortunately, the few who would be tyrants could not succeed without the aid of those people who imagine that their relationship to the state is the same as that of the sheep to the shepherd.America is at a crossroads of decision. Would that her people choose vigilance and freedom and prosperity…not apathy and bondage and poverty.

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 11:06 pm

rules of the old capitalist are brokengain is now lostbankrupt is now on-going concernco’s that should have been liquidated are now a must feed capital intravenous patientbad news is now good news while good news is great newsnormally investors trade for the full day now we only see “actions” in the final houryou know what,our whole life existence was a farce and jokeafter all of this, can we return back to our normal lives???i dont think so

PeteCANovember 18th, 2008 at 11:06 pm

An excellent set of charts by Dr Housing Bubble can be found at:http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/10-significant-signs-why-this-will-be-the-worst-recession-since-world-war-ii/Please note Reason #10, showing long-term S&P 500 plot.The current drop does not look like a standard recession.It looks a lot more like an on-going crash in the markets.I am NOT saying that there won’t be a bear market rally.In all probability there likely will be one.But still … take a look at this plot for yourself.———————-Also, some very good charts from John Williams at ShadowStats can be found here (see below). Note especially the corrected figures for US inflation and unemployment. While John Williams’ figures sometimes raise doubts from readers, I think the general _trends_ (not necessarily absolute values) shown in the ShadowStats calculations are probably more on track than published US Gov’t data.http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_dataPeteCA

GuestNovember 18th, 2008 at 11:13 pm

So do I, Guest-o-Rama, so do I. And wonder why they do. Those who exploit the people for profit, such as those now blaming families for buying a home during the seven years of a deliberate, Fed-blown housing bubble, i.e. Greenspan’s exuberance, or for driving an SUV at the moment of a deliberate oil heist by the Exxon and Wall Street commodity monopoly robbing the people of billions and impoverishing many, blame us for what they do.What’s even more amazing are the people who buy into their lies.

CaponeNovember 18th, 2008 at 11:16 pm

see Cox recommendations in last week’s (11/8) Barron’s for a professional’s view which I agree completely with. agriculture first, then silver and then oil would be my choices in orderMOS, SLV and physical silver if you can get it and USO…

KJ FoehrNovember 18th, 2008 at 11:18 pm

Let’s see… vigilance and freedom and prosperity, or apathy and bondage and poverty. Hmmm… I give up; I can’t decide.That is a false choice. We already have all those things in varying proportions now. And no one in their right mind would choose more apathy, bondage, and poverty.What we need to do now is figure out how to best preserve the freedom, and prosperity we have enjoyed without destroying our economy through bankruptcy, and without defiling the planet beyond use in the process.

GuestNovember 19th, 2008 at 1:41 am

Grasshoppers do not have a high standard of living: ants do. In that Americans have a high standard of living, Americans are ants, not grasshoppers. If the majority of Americans were grasshoppers, there would be no America as we know it. America would be passe, a Zimbabwe, a scorched earth with abject poverty. America’s corn harvest feeds 40% of mankind – every year. Somebody has to produce America’s cornucopia: that somebody is the American people — the growers, shippers, packers, processors, marketers, retailers, researchers, developers, innovators, miners, craftsmen, engineers… If there are grasshoppers in this society, it’s the investment bankers and the able bodied non producers who live off the state itself. Neither group could feed if it weren’t for the hard working, i.e. the producers, i.e. the ants, i.e. the majority.You ask, “Is the ant foolish to limit its freedom by working more to prepare for the future? Or is it expanding its freedom by enabling it to survive?” How you and I do differ. I ask you, How does survival expand freedom? I consider the right to work as freedom: I consider the right to use my God-given talents as freedom. I consider the right to keep and eat what I produce as freedom, I consider the right to determine, within limits, my own destiny as freedom, I consider the right to brotherhood as freedom, and I consider life and freedom as a right. I do not consider survival a “right.”By your words, people should limit their desires and the ambitions that birth the miracle of production so as to “preserve” the resources of production else all starve and freeze and DIE in the winter, like profligate GRASSHOPPERS who rape the harvests of others — as if most resources aren’t renewable, developable, expandable and sustainable, and as if most Americans are bottom feeders. And if we don’t desist, someone should do it for us. IOW, the government should step in and limit us, so we can be free.If winter is approaching in this country, as you say, then let those living the life of a grasshopper suffer the consequences — i.e., the parasitic bankers and the able-bodied government hangers on: and let the ant survive to enjoy the fruits of his labors. Let “survival,” as you say, be the determinant of who is the “grasshopper” and who the “ant,” not the state.Else it soon will be “Brother, can you spare a dime?” for all of us.

Robert BerkeNovember 19th, 2008 at 1:51 am

Roubini says that the downturn will be more severe and last two years. From my reading of his comments, I think he says that the recession began in Spring ‘o8. If so, that means the recovery begins sometime in Spring ’10. Do others agree?

GuestNovember 19th, 2008 at 1:52 am

if the ‘figuring out’ is going to progress past the talking stage, we need someone who agrees with the resultant conclusions and has the power to enforce them over those who do not voluntarily agree to them.It would be a big mess but this whole planetary situation is going to be a big mess anyway…sorry for sounding pessimistic…

GuestNovember 19th, 2008 at 2:12 am

hmmm…at this point it looks like the downhill will escalate after christmas, at least slightly. After that we can have an continued downhill until at least Q4 2009. Depending on what Obama+rest of the planet does, recovery could start 2010…Of course something being possible in my imagination does not mean it is actually possible in reality…what I mean is: what can they actually do to mend the situation?Also, if US has two consequtive quarters of growth, it does not mean good times are back BECAUSE the downhill has been going on for about a year or more now (actually houseprices started going down back in 2006) at a specific rate (speed). If it was possible to rebuild the economy back to the pre-recession era, it would take the same length of time to the other direction (given the same rate of development)

fedwatcherNovember 19th, 2008 at 2:34 am

Dr. Roubini,Maybe only 1 in 5 will walk away or maybe only 1 in 4 will walk away. However, more people who are underwater by $100,000.00 or greater will walk rather than those underwater by $10,000.00.I believe the losses will be greater because those who are underwater by large amounts will walk at a very high ratio. The losses are not determined by the number of walkers, but by the amount they are walking away from.

MarkNovember 19th, 2008 at 2:48 am

Answer: Since the key component of growth is in decline: oil. Unlike the other events this IS _THE_ big one: no other concentration of energy/power/wealth exists.

MarkNovember 19th, 2008 at 3:19 am

Roubini wrote:I’ve been saying for a while this will be the worst financial crisis the US has experienced since the Great Depression and it looks like the worst one. I mean I don’t think there’s anything that’s happened since the Great Depression looks so severe. Of course the real economic consequences in terms of output contraction are not going to be as bad as the Great Depression because there is a massive amount of policy action (emphasis added)What policy actions? The ones that have failed (so far)? The ONLY way out is to reduce our debts, and as the US consumer digs in this will only further pull down the rest of the world, thereby reducing THEIR demand for US goods! It’s checkmate baby. Game over…

GSMNovember 19th, 2008 at 4:26 am

Of cours, the economic contraction will be severe. That is beyond any doubt as debt and borrowing are going to play a fraction of the part they previously paid in the old US economy. What I think is of even more concern will be the period after this economic decline. Hopes for an economic rebound are likely to be shredded by the new reality of a much smaller US economy. Years and years of hardship lie ahead for the US people as their economy restructures to a vastly new dynamic where debt is strictly regulated. This is going to become quite a shock to most US citizens.

ORNovember 19th, 2008 at 5:44 am

All extremes, such as the ones you propose, are bad. Each person decides how to live his/her life. But the observation that people in the US have lived beyond their means, mortgage their future, and damaged the environment more than any other country on earth are facts that you cannot dispute.The average person needs to lower his/her spending (actually they are being forced to). What each one of us cuts is our own business. But some of the ideas you propose are worth considering.

Octavio RichettaNovember 19th, 2008 at 6:30 am

Why do we need hybrid cars? I used to drive a 1986 Honda Civic Hatchback 1.3l engine which gave me over 40 miles/gallon. Granted, it is not a car for a family of 5 going on a long trip. But for daily commuting it should be fine. How many SUVs with a single person in it do you see in your morning commute?

Wild BillNovember 19th, 2008 at 6:35 am

The need to affix blame is vital to individuals who wish to delude themselves into thinking that they are somewhat in control of the events that shape their lives. When someone dies, they attribute it to the deceased lifestyle. “He was a smoker. He was overweight. He was a couch potato.” When someone experiences a severe financial setback due to divorce: “He is irresponsible. He never grew up. He drank too much.”While there may be truth in these accusations, the motivation is really to state: “These things won’t happen to me because I am more virtuous. I watch my weight. I don’t smoke. I eat organic food. I live within my means.A good hard look at the facts will reveal that while there is much we can do to govern the outcome of our actions, a much larger component of outcomes is the result of chance. Being born in the wrong part of the world, having access to quality health care annd nutrition, not being in the wrong place at the wrong time, etc. are all conditions not under our control.Moralizing about those less fortunate than us and attributing the disasters that befall them to only their actions, is not only inaccurate, but eliminates compassion and accentuates sadistic obsessions with punitive behavior. Besides that, it doesn’t work. You will still be frightened into sanctimonious delusions. It’s now time to exchange shoes and start walking.

MarkNovember 19th, 2008 at 6:45 am

OR, I measure not mpg, but pmpg: people miles per gallon. A Hummer fully loaded beats a Prius with only one person in it! It’s how the tool is used that counts!You’ve got me beat, however, I’ve got a 1990 Toyota Corolla and only average about 33 – 34 mpg. This is still better than just about all other “fuel efficient” cars produced today.My work commuter does much much better- it’s a bicycle!Better to run these things into the ground given all the embodied energy in them.

OuterBeltwayNovember 19th, 2008 at 6:56 am

This is an article from Atimes, written by a former U.S. State Department official who served as chief strategist for new initiatives in the Overseas Buildings Operations Bureau.It talks about the structural changes that China might consider as it reacts to global economic trends. The article might serve as a guide for the U.S., too. It’s worth a read.US template wrong for China

GuestNovember 19th, 2008 at 7:10 am

Perfectly said. The oligarch’s in this country have us blaming each other while they’re looting our system. The white collar have class envy of the oligarch and believe if they subscribe to they’re beliefs they’ll too someday be an oligarch too (emporers has no clothes) so they do and take it out on the uneducated worker. Enough people have made a good amount of money with 401k’s and stocks that they’re deluded into believing even after the crash that this is how a real economy works (A real ponzi scheme that is). We need to wake up quickly and see our true enemy and stop blaming each other, that enemy is the mega corporations the oligarchy and their beholden politicians. If you don’t believe class war fare is and has been taking place you are simply under the medias and oligarchy’s spell.

AnonymousNovember 19th, 2008 at 7:16 am

I am old enough to know this: there has never been a situation excepting possibly the Great Depression where there exists continuous declines in the credit markets, stock markets, bond markets, derivatives markets, housing markets, employment markets, import and export markets, manufacturing markets, retail sales markets,etc in the U.S. and in most world economies without an end in sight. You bet I’m getting nervous. You tell me where I can safely put my money now without it losing significant value over the next several years!!!

AnonymousNovember 19th, 2008 at 7:17 am

If you want to invest like Buffet, buy Berkshire. Forget trying to emulate his stock picks. He doesn’t buy on the same terms as the rest of us as has been pointed out here.

OuterBeltwayNovember 19th, 2008 at 7:27 am

Well done, WB. Say, have you given much thought to where the economic & social pendulum settles during and after this next set of WW economic restructuring? I’m trying to identify the major themes/trends. Has anyone made a list of the (U.S.) fundamentals yet, e.g.:a. 50% less energy consumptionb. 50% fewer miles traveledc. 20% fewer purchases (in $ and just # txns)d. interests shift from passive observation of exterior/remote/”famous” actions of others toward involvement in family/personal interest activitiesStuff like that. I’m trying to find the fault lines of where the next social & econ shifts will be. Will we de-couple from the TV? Get outside? Decide that consumption and fulfillment aren’t necessarily the same?If anyone’s got a lead on where a thorough, accurate, and well-researched discussion of emergent social trends is, I’d like to know about it. TIA.

OuterBeltwayNovember 19th, 2008 at 7:39 am

RGE BrainTrust Conference Call AnnouncementCall starts at 09:00AM U.S.EST.Organizational Design meeting.What’s our mission, how do we set strategy and sub-groups?We’ll hear from some of the RGE regulars as they explain their vision for what the BrainTrust should do.OuterBeltway gives a presentation a powerful toolset the BrainTrust could use to achieve its goals.The first 96 people to call in…are in.The phone number: 218.339.4300Access code: 882086# (don’t forget the pound sign)

Guest-o-RamaNovember 19th, 2008 at 7:41 am

Don’t panic A. As long as you have dollars you don’t need to put it anywhere. Its the people holding real estate and debt that are going to get spanked. Unless the powers that be manage to dump the dollar. Then all the rats will head off the ship and it will be a matter of who hits the water first.

randyNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:10 am

@ OR:Thanks for the advice many months ago about a little civil judgement I had. I paid it off last month and am happy i did! I’ve only got my main home mortgage now and it’s at 55% LTV. I plan to pay it off within 1-2 years. Then, I have no debt. Trying to prepare for what I think it coming. Again. Thanks……Randy

Guest-o-RamaNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:13 am

If this was in response to my comment above, I don’t think they’re going to save it-at least not before Obama gets in office and then maybe they’ll be out of $ and in bankruptcy. But they do have provisions in this country for renegotiating contracts. Maybe GM would be profitable without having so many dealers and the UAW and healthcare obligations for retirees.Then again maybe China is going to start making really awesome $5000.00 cars in the next few years and we’ll be right back to where we were with the US unable to compete.My comment above was to say that why can’t people holding the CDOs or banks holding the CDOs go into bankruptcy and restructure. Sure it will suck for their creditors but that’s how business works. All the airlines did it. The auto industry is probably about to do it. I just don’t see why the banks can’t. Depositors get their money first and then creditors get a workaround or an offer of some cents on the dollar or they just get screwed. Ultimately if a person can’t pay they can’t pay. There are no workhouses they can go to work off the debt. Ditto for corporations.

Wild BillNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:13 am

You could try Gerald Celente. He seems to have a handle on things. He predicts that this part of the 21st century will be a time of great innovation. On that, I agree. He also predicts a middle-class revolution by 2012. I don’t know about that.

Guest-o-RamaNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:25 am

If we don’t mind the pollution we don’t “need” hybrid cars. Hybrid cars sell at a premium and until gas was $4.00 a gallon it only made sense for people with really long commutes to pay $10,000 extra to get the technology. But the family car people really need because little kids have to be in car seats. And most people don’t have the luxury of a family car plus 2 commuters. And most families contain 2 people who commute to different places. Mom drops the kids and drives the empty minivan to work and then dad picks up a kid in his SUV and goes to soccer and mom picks up another kid and goes to music lessons. Everyone who drives a kid has to have car seats and they have to be in the back effectively making a 4 seat vehicle minimum necessary. If the kid has friends you have to have 3 rows…

MarkNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:40 am

Looking for a site that publishes notices of layoffs in US.I seem to recall such a site, and I think that I actually bookmarked it but am unable to find it :-(

Detlef GuertlerNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:59 am

@all participants of the Conference Call:If you have made any notes during the call that you think should be mentioned in the protocol – please send them to me,detlef.guertler (at) gmx.de, so I can add it.If you have notes about your own statements – please send them to me, detlef.guertler (at) gmx.de, so I can check if I got you right.If you have notes about statements you wanted to say but didn`t say – please send them to me,detlef.guertler (at) gmx.de, so I can add them as appendix.If you have neither that nor that nor that – please send me your name so I can complete the list of participants.By the way: It was a great start.

OuterBeltwayNovember 19th, 2008 at 9:00 am

We just concluded a very, very productive meeting. We’ll be publishing the meeting transcript sometime in the next day or so.Miss Italy – I am remiss for not inviting you to make an announcement (per your remarks to MA) during this meeting. I will remember to do so next time.For those of you that would like your own copy of the meeting minutes, I invite you to drop me a line at outerbeltway at yahoo dot com , with subject line “Transcript Request”.

JimmyTheBankerNovember 19th, 2008 at 9:08 am

Ben’s nightmare…10:07 a.m.Kohn: Fed should respond aggressively to deflation10:06 a.m.Kohn: Risk of deflation is higher than few months ago

randyNovember 19th, 2008 at 9:10 am

Outerbeltway e al:Thank you for alowing me time during this call to express my opinions. I am humbled to be a part of this group and will do whatever I can to help this effort succeed.Randy

GuestNovember 19th, 2008 at 9:31 am

The two are inversely proportionate as major technological benefits eliminate the need for human capital as has been happening those productive gains have to be transferred somewhere so far they are going to the top 1%. If this trend continues we will see a middle-class revolution, or an extermination of people either or but chaos should ensue.

little annNovember 19th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

I’m sorry but was unable to attend the meeting this morning even though I had committed myself. I am a very infrequent contributor to the blog since I don’t have any formal financial/ economic background and am totally intimidated by those that have. However, if this issue has been discussed in detail, I missed it. It concerns SS problems. I feel very fortunate to have been blessed with all I need. I feel that even though I had contributed my entire working life to SS, I am in a position at this moment not to need a payment. My idea is this: Could the gov’t devise a system which allows individuals to waive payment of benefit indefinitely or for a period of time which I can choose and perhaps change as my financial condition changes, and apply it to my children’s future acct. At the same time, could I be given a tax credit for my contribution (less Medicare portion) on my yearly income tax. It seems like a very easy thing to incorporate into our cumbersome system. If there seems to be something wrong with this idea or if it has been discussed, I would appreciate a response. I hope to be part of the next meeting. You have shown great leadership capability. ( I have been an educator for 34 yrs, now retired, and know these things). I don’t know you’re age but you have the energy of a very young person (late twenties) and the wisdom/ maturity of an older person (forties/ fifties). Thanks for all of it. It is contagious!!! Sincerely, Little ann

PatzNovember 19th, 2008 at 8:44 pm

How is Soc Sec broken? That’s a mime started by Bush and repeated by the Right Wing Chorus (RWC) in order for Wall Street to get ahold of that money to plow into its schemes. It is funded for 40 years and beyond that simply by raising the $100,000 ceiling it could be funded indefinately. That’s a nonsensical thing to say in light of all the things that are broken.

Ford JohnsonNovember 23rd, 2008 at 6:53 pm

The Limits to GrowthAbstract established by Eduard Pestel. A Report to The Club of Rome (1972),by Donella H. Meadows, Dennis l. Meadows, Jorgen Randers, William W. Behrens IIIShort Version of the Limits to GrowthOur world model was built specifically to investigate five major trends of global concern – accelerating industrialization, rapid population growth, widespread malnutrition, depletion of nonrenewable resources, and a deteriorating environment.The model we have constructed is, like every model, imperfect, oversimplified, and unfinished.In spite of the preliminary state of our work, we believe it is important to publish the model and our findings now. (…) We feel that the model described here is already sufficiently developed to be of some use to decision-makers. Furthermore, the basic behavior modes we have already observed in this model appear to be so fundamental and general that we do not expect our broad conclusions to be substantially altered by further revisions.Our conclusions are :1. If the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.2. It is possible to alter these growth trends and to establish a condition of ecological and economic stabilitythat is sustainable far into the future. The state of global equilibrium could be designed so that the basicmaterial needs of each person on earth are satisfied and each person has an equal opportunity to realize hisindividual human potential.If the world’s people decide to strive for this second outcome rather than the first, the sooner they beginworking to attain it, the greater will be their chances of success.All five elements basic to the study reported here–population, food production, and consumption ofnonrenewable natural resources–are increasing. The amount of their increase each year follows a patternthat mathematicians call exponential growth.A quantity exhibits exponential growth when it increases by a constant percentage of the whole in aconstant time period.Such exponential growth is a common process in biological, financial, and many other systems of theworld.Exponential growth is a dynamic phenomenon, which means that it involves elements that change over time.(…) When many different quantities are growing simultaneously in a system, however, and when all thequantities are interrelated in a complicated way, analysis of the causes of growth and of the future behaviorof the system becomes very difficult indeed.Over the course of the last 30 years there has evolved at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology a newmethod for understanding the dynamic behavior of complex systems. The method is called SystemDynamics. The basis of the method is the recongnition that the structure of any system–the many circular,interlocking, sometimes time-delayed relationships among its components–is often just as important indetermining its behavior as the individual components themselves. The world model described in this book isa System Dynamics modelExtrapolation of present trends is a time-honored way of looking into the future, especially the very nearfuture, and especially if the quantity being considered is not much influenced by other trends that areoccuring elsewhere in the system. Of course, none of the five factors we are examining here is independent.Each interacts constantly with all the others. We have already mentioned some of these interactions.Population cannot grow without food, food production is increased by growth of capital, more capitalrequires more resources, discarded resources become pollution, pollution interferes with the growth of both

international tradeMay 28th, 2011 at 12:17 pm

Comfortably, the news post is during truthfulness a hottest on this subject well known subject matter. I agree with ones conclusions and often will desperately look ahead to your updaters. Saying thanks a lot will not just be sufficient, for ones wonderful ability in your producing. I will immediately grab ones own feed to stay knowledgeable from any sort of update versions. Amazing get the done and much success with yourbusiness results!

photo ornamentsJune 1st, 2011 at 12:26 am

I found your weblog website on google and examine a few of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the superb operate. I just further up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking for forward to studying extra from you in a while!…

sinüzit belirtileriJune 4th, 2011 at 4:42 pm

That is the fitting blog for anybody who needs to search out out about this topic. You notice a lot its almost onerous to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You definitely put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just nice!

bayan azdırıcıJune 4th, 2011 at 7:54 pm

Oh my goodness! an incredible article dude. Thank you Nevertheless I’m experiencing situation with ur rss . Don’t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting similar rss drawback? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx

Ankara Oto KiralamaJune 4th, 2011 at 10:28 pm

Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn something like this before. So nice to search out any person with some unique thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for beginning this up. this website is something that is needed on the web, somebody with a little originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

muhabbetJune 5th, 2011 at 3:13 pm

I simply wanted to make a quick note so as to thank you for those magnificent ideas you are writing at this website. My prolonged internet search has at the end of the day been paid with high-quality concept to write about with my company. I would point out that most of us visitors actually are very much fortunate to live in a notable site with so many perfect individuals with helpful tips. I feel somewhat happy to have discovered the webpage and look forward to really more thrilling moments reading here. Thank you once again for everything.

yurtiçi taşımacılıkJune 5th, 2011 at 10:24 pm

An fascinating discussion is value comment. I think that it is best to write extra on this matter, it won’t be a taboo topic however generally people are not enough to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

sıfır arabalarJune 5th, 2011 at 10:53 pm

Can I just say what a relief to search out somebody who actually knows what theyre talking about on the internet. You definitely know easy methods to bring a problem to mild and make it important. Extra people need to learn this and perceive this facet of the story. I cant imagine youre not more in style because you definitely have the gift.

hair colorJune 7th, 2011 at 4:47 pm

I was very pleased to search out this net-site.I needed to thanks for your time for this excellent learn!! I definitely having fun with every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you blog post.

Trista LanquistJune 8th, 2011 at 2:53 pm

My husband and i felt quite more than happy Chris could conclude his survey via the ideas he got when using the weblog. It’s not at all simplistic to simply always be handing out things some others may have been selling. Therefore we consider we have got the writer to appreciate for this. All the illustrations you’ve made, the straightforward website navigation, the relationships you give support to foster – it’s got all extraordinary, and it is making our son and the family imagine that this issue is exciting, and that is particularly mandatory. Thank you for everything!

malibu hotelsJune 9th, 2011 at 11:36 am

I simply wanted to post a quick remark so as to express gratitude to you for these splendid solutions you are sharing on this site. My time-consuming internet look up has at the end of the day been rewarded with extremely good facts and techniques to share with my two friends. I ‘d express that most of us site visitors are extremely blessed to live in a good community with many lovely individuals with very beneficial tactics. I feel rather blessed to have discovered your entire site and look forward to tons of more amazing minutes reading here. Thanks again for a lot of things.

ColinJune 12th, 2011 at 5:07 pm

Hi there, a very good read and it sometimes just takes someone to post something like this to make me realise where I’ve been going wrong! Just added the site to my bookmarks so will check back now and then. Cheers.

konteynerJune 12th, 2011 at 10:32 pm

A powerful share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little analysis on this. And he in actual fact purchased me breakfast because I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the deal with! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying extra on this topic. If possible, as you become expertise, would you thoughts updating your blog with extra particulars? It is extremely helpful for me. Large thumb up for this blog submit!

promosJune 15th, 2011 at 8:00 am

Hiya, I’m really glad I have found this info. Nowadays bloggers publish only about gossips and web and this is really annoying. A good web site with interesting content, this is what I need. Thank you for keeping this web-site, I’ll be visiting it. Do you do newsletters? Cant find it.

4 wheel parts coupon codeJune 15th, 2011 at 3:38 pm

Thank you, I have recently been searching for information about this topic for a long time and yours is the greatest I have found out so far. But, what in regards to the bottom line? Are you positive concerning the supply?

JericoBarkerAugust 7th, 2011 at 8:34 pm

Hello I am so delighted I found your site, I really found you by mistake, while I was watching on yahoo for something else, Anyways I am here now and would just like to say thank for a tremendous post and a all round entertaining blog. Please do keep up the great work.

cellular roaming

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.