EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

Roubini Says U.S. Needs $400 Billion Stimulus Package

Bloomberg (October 27, 2008): Roubini Says US Needs $400 Billion Stimulus Package (click for video)

10282008.jpg

From Bloomberg:

U.S. Should Enact $400 Billion Stimulus, Roubini Says (Update1) By John Brinsley

Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. government should enact an economic stimulus package of between $400 billion and $500 billion before the end of the Bush administration in January, New York University professor Nouriel Roubini said.

Roubini, who predicted the current financial crisis in 2006, said the economy risks falling into “a self-fulfilling animal spirit recession that is more severe than otherwise” because of the collapse of credit markets and weak consumer and corporate spending.

“The only way to increase aggregate demand is going to be through” government spending on roads, bridges and other infrastructure, Roubini said at a Bloomberg conference in New York. “We need a huge plan, $300 billion is not going to be enough. I think we’re going to need a plan of $400 billion to $500 billion.”

U.S. Treasury officials and other policy makers are grappling with financial turmoil that has pushed down the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index by 42 percent this year, its worst annual retreat since 1931.

“If we don’t do that fiscal stimulus today, three months from now, six months from now the collapse of the real economy is going to be so severe that anything we’re doing today to recapitalize the financial system is going to be undone,” Roubini said.

Tax Rebates

President George W. Bush in February signed into law a $168 billion measure that sent tax rebates of as much as $600 to individuals and $1,200 to couples. Checks went to 111 million households beginning in May.

Government efforts to revive lending have made central banks around the world the “lender of first resort” while credit and other markets remain “extremely dysfunctional,” Roubini said.

“Financial markets are becoming totally unhinged,” he said. “Fundamentals don’t matter, valuation doesn’t matter the only thing that matters right now is flows, and the flows out there are sellers, and no buyers.”

Investors withdrew a record $43 billion from hedge funds last month, according to TrimTabs Investment Research in Sausalito, California. The Goldman Sachs VIP Basket of stocks with the most hedge fund ownership has lost 47 percent this year, more than eight of 10 industries in the S&P 500.

“We’re entering literally a vicious circle where economies are spinning down, financial markets are spinning lower, and the policy makers in my view — and that’s my biggest fear — have lost control of what’s going on in financial markets,” Roubini said.

Bloomberg (October 29, 2008): Roubini Says S&P May Fall 30% More Over 2-Year Recession (click for video)

10292008nouriel_250.jpg

Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) — Nouriel Roubini, the New York University professor who predicted the current financial crisis in 2006, talks with Bloomberg’s Carol Massar and Ellen Braitman in New York about the U.S. economy, outlook for the equity market and Federal Reserve monetary policy. (Source: Bloomberg) 00:00 Recession outlook, financial market crisis 01:48 Stock market valuations, performance 02:58 Impact of U.S. recession on emerging markets 03:31 Fed forecast, Libor; consumer confidence 06:17 Outlook for economy, financial markets Running time 07:22

PBS (October 28, 2008): One on One with Nouriel Roubini, Economics Professor at NYU’s Stern School of Business (click for video)

images.jpg

From PBS: SUSIE GHARIB: One person who predicted the financial crisis is Nouriel Roubini, economics professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business. More than two years ago, he gave a speech at the International Monetary Fund warning of an impending crisis. Homeowners defaulting on mortgages, an oil price shock, the collapse of the global financial system and a deep recession. The audience was skeptical. Recently, I sat down with Roubini and asked him what he saw that others missed.

NOURIEL ROUBINI, PROF. OF ECONOMICS, NYU STERN SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: Usually in periods of time when there is excessive euphoria, irrational exuberance and people lose track of the economic and financial fundamentals. And to consider financial crisis, you have to take a bit of a holistic approach (INAUDIBLE). You have to look at experiences, history, other case studies and therefore take an approach that looks at a variety of elements. The exact timing of when a crisis may occur is hard to predict, but you know with a certain amount of certainty that this will (INAUDIBLE) eventually is going to lead to a crash.

GHARIB: Professor Roubini, who or what is the major culprit of this financial crisis?

ROUBINI: First of all the Fed kept interest rates too low for too long and created the housing bubble. Secondly the Fed and the other regulators were asleep at the wheel and allowed all these toxic mortgages to be created without controlling it. Three, there was plenty of greed and excessive risk taking on Wall Street. And four, the rating agencies had major conflicts of interest because they were being paid by those that were supposed to be rating. So the blame is to be shared by many different culprits.

GHARIB: Now what everybody wants to know is how long and how painful is this financial crisis going to be?

ROUBINI: Unfortunately, I do believe that this is going to be a pretty severe financial and banking crisis and also severe recession.

GHARIB: So you’re saying that the worst is ahead of us. What is going to be the magnitude of it?

ROUBINI: Well, I expect that the recession is going to last two years. We’re still at the beginning stages of a recession. I expect that the cumulative fall of output from the peak might be on the order of 5 percent, much bigger than the recent recessions. I worried that the unemployment rate might rise to be about 8 to 9 percent. Right now it’s only 6.1 percent. So it’s going to be severe and we’ll have hundreds of smaller financial institutions (INAUDIBLE) are going to go bankrupt. And even some of the regional banks might be in severe trouble, might have to be closed down or merged with other institutions. So this is a severe crisis.

GHARIB: So how important are falling home prices in all of this?

ROUBINI: As long as they fall, there’s a residential construction, recession’s going to continue. Secondly, homeowners feel less rich and they’re going to spend less. There is going to be less consumption. And three with falling prices so much, there will be about 20 million houses going to be under water with the value of their homes being less than the value of their mortgages and therefore with an incentive to walk away from their homes.

GHARIB: So Professor Roubini, what are you watching now that will tell you that things are getting better or worse?

ROUBINI: We have to look at what’s happening to real consumption, since consumption is about 70 percent of aggregate demand. Right now consumption is falling because U.S. consumers are shopped out. They are saving less. They are debt burdened. The value of their home is falling. The value of their equity stock is falling. Employment is falling. So all the factors that determine consumption are going south and therefore we’re in the middle of a severe consumer-led recession.

GHARIB: If you could pin it down to one thing, what would you say is the lessons learned from this crisis?

ROUBINI: The crucial lesson learned from this crisis is that you need financial regulation and supervision of the financial system, because self regulation is no regulation. And in a situation of irrational exuberance, then market discipline does not occur.

GHARIB: What advice would you give to the next president of the United States on how to solve this economic and financial crisis?

ROUBINI: The institutions that are solvent have to be recapitalized and rescued. Those that are insolvent should be shut down. Since demand is falling, we need government spending to boost demand and avoid the most severe recession and most likely the Fed will have to cut interest rates further as a way to stimulate the economy. So you need a comprehensive and consistent economic plan.

GHARIB: Professor Roubini, thank you so much for your time.

ROUBINI: Pleasure being with you today. Thanks.

345 Responses to “Roubini Says U.S. Needs $400 Billion Stimulus Package”

JamesOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:38 am

But isn’t this all a big bubble popping and we need for all these things to spin down quite a bit to reach a level where the fundamentals of companies reflect their valuation? I guess the question is how to control it and prevent it from spinning out of control…

GMOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:50 am

Why spend more money, Roubini? Why?Engorging the deficit is not what we need.Let deflation take its course.The sooner the drunk vomits, the sooner he sobers up! He doesnt need more booz!!

Octavio RichettaOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:56 am

I guess we may have another day of short covering ahead of us. This post is on leverage/deleveraging and increased volatility, how did they start, when will they end.Low volatility in 2003-2007 induced extreme leverage. Then, when economic uncertainty around the time subprime became public knowledge the summer of 2007 induced greater volatility it was the extreme leverage in the market that really magnified the volatility. Leveraged institutions were caught with their pants down. The deleveraging of financial institutions has generated a very nasty feedback loop which has taken volatility to extremes never seen before in the history of WW financial markets.The current extreme volatility in the financial markets is inducing hedge funds and other firms to reduce leverage which in turn increases volatility; but deleveraging will eventually run its course and volatility will come down to more “normal” levels.It can be easily shown that given the increased volatility environment we are in, a long-short hedge fund that is leveraged 10:1, possibly as low as 5:1, will face huge losses that will make it close its doors. And the problem is that even if they deleverage, the losses in the deleveraging process will be so step that the best strategy for the hedge fund manager will be to close shop. This is because their huge fees (20% of earnings) usually kick in only after past losses are recovered. Thus, losses as low as 30% will make most hedge funds close shop.Forget the third quarter; the fourth quarter is going to be the WORST in the history of hedge funds. During the third quarter volatility was pretty bad around the GSEs bailout in July; then it got really ugly starting in the second half of September, around the 700 bailout plan announcement; but it wasn’t half as bad as it is now. Volatility really went through the roof starting in October. Extreme volatility will slowly die-off but it will take a lot of bodies with it.Keep an eye on http://hf-implode.com/Justin Owings and Aaron Krowne are gonna have to work 24/7 to keep up with the numbers:-)

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:57 am

Out on the streets………..some people are quietly hoping for the best and planning for the worst, but most are toopreoccupied with either getting food on the table this week or totally oblivious and watching the World Series orthe Toronto Maple Leafs. I suspect only when the grim reaper knocks on the door will they realize what hit them.Good post… hopefully the Feds will get moving. Good Luck from Canada. PS Check out our banking system; we’re inbetter shape than you guys. Our commodities are weaping at the moment – but heh, they are are still in the ground andhaven’t disppeared into a black hole where most of the $700B Congress passed is likely to end up. (bank mergers)

Yossarian21October 29th, 2008 at 7:58 am

“Everyone is a Keynesian now”.. Would be interesting to see how Roubini comes up with the numbers – 300 billion vs. 500 billion..

JGUOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:17 am

If we keep borrowing to do things not productive, how can we repay all those bloating debt, my professor? Frankly, it’s a Ponzi scheme. Those gimmicks may fool the creditor nations for a while, but do you really expect them to be fooled forever? It is true that the bursting of a gigantic bubble is painful, but a bursting of an even bigger bubble down the road??? Do we ever learn?

JGUOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:20 am

I warn you, Professor, nowadays, what you say has a huge impact on the decision making of those clueless politicians, what you suggested is better than tax cut, but nevertheless, only delays the inevitable.

BR GuyOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:27 am

Which is the actual situation ? The market,BW2 , dollar, CDS, are up to implode ? What can still they do to avoid that, i mean, they are holding on with all they’re forces the meltdown, today is really the last silver bullet ? After that we can see the world going red ? Markets collapsing, CDS blowing, dollar falling and inflation flying high in the skys ?

KJ FoehrOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:30 am

New Roubini video up on Bloomberg. In it he says the recession started in Jan 2008 and will likely end at the end of 2009. That sounds downright optimistic to me compared with his recent comments about the possibility of an L shaped, Japan like scenario.If his prediction is right the stock market will probably bottom in the Spring or Summer at the latest. That would be just six months or so from now, which is sooner than I had been thinking.The stock market decline in the GD lasted 3 years and the tech bubble bear market also lasted 2 ½ years or so. If this one ends in early summer, 2009, that would be only 20 months – not too bad for the worst financial crisis since the GD and the worst recession in decades…http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.htm?N=av&T=Roubini%20Says%20S%26P%20May%20Fall%2030%25%20More%20Over%202-Year%20Recession&clipSRC=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/v.8Wcra7zbSE.asf

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:39 am

Art Cashin’ comments Cashin suggests this rally could have legs and buying the dips might have merit, though in the longer term he sees lows being tested and perhaps broken. He attributes yesterday’s rally trigger to a 2:00pm announcement out of Japan regarding intervention to weaken the Yen, which was followed by short covering, which was followed by panic buying.And a comment made by someone else went something to the effect that the term “bear market” was derived from the position a grizzly assumes in a fight e.g. standing tall (like yesterday’s charts) on its hind legs, lunging towards its opponent.And finally Libor set at 3.42 vs. 3.46 yesterday and 3.51 this time last week. Libor has voted on the rescuebail packages and it now flatlining.

Dave ThomasOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:40 am

At this point I’d like to know where the 800lbs gorilla is. What is the next macro event that sends the economy into a tailspin? Will it be the collapse of an emerging or frontier market and the certain contagion that will follow, or the blindness of fiscal policy that keeps the financial system moving but ignores the rest of the economy?

JimmyTheBankerOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:58 am

Professor, with all due respect, quit volunteering to give away my hard earned money to those who didn’t earn it! I get nothing from these stimulus packages and you are rewarding those who chose to live on the edge, pay check to pay check!

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:03 am

Fox Story on Obama form LA Times – wont release videohttp://elections.foxnews.com/2008/10/28/la-times-refuses-release-tape-obama-praising-controversial-activist/

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:08 am

Prof Roubini:None of these “stimulus plan” ideas work. Why not? Because it’s just a “sugar fix” for the economy. The money does not go into the economy in a constructive way. What’s needed are proper economic plans that will re-structure the economy and start to create new permanent jobs. But for that to take place, people have to really figure out how the US will re-establish its competitiveness. That requires some real brainwork – an area where the administration and the Fed have been running low for a long time.Another $400 billion stimulus package will accomplish nothing – except to force the Gov’t to monetize an extra $400 billion this coming year.PeteCA

Ooctavio RichettaOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:09 am

Wow! Primero! Has generated four responses already. I guess this is a good way of getting your comment read:-) Check my comment on deleveraging below.

richinarOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:15 am

I wonder when the economy will actually crash. I keep expecting to see the signs of the real economy being affected by the disaster in the financial markets. I would expect to see empty seats at college football games on Saturdays. Instead they are all still full.People spend about $100.00 minimum to go to and enjoy a college football game. There are about 80,000 seats on average at most college football stadiums. Hundreds of games each week. Until we see some empty seats at the games I will not believe the real economy has been impacted.It may be that we just have a financial system event that never impacts J6P.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:19 am

Prof. Roubini is not advocating “giving” money away as you claim but by the government “spending on roads, bridges and other infrastructure”.Besides your statement about “rewarding those who chose to live on the edge, pay check to pay check” is inconsiderate. After all the entire U.S. capitalistic system is based on and supported by cheap labor. Of course I should understand that in that vein you would consider the members of the labor force as being expendable low-life “who could have been something else if they just have wanted”.

StocksGoinGreenOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:22 am

Good Morning-I think you got your answer yesterday. My guess is the Fed told street insiders that the street was gettin gwhat it wanted-50 bps. If it is 75, panic will ensue becuase the markets will wonder what dire things the Fed is seeing they are not, if it is 25, the street will be disappointed but the great suck-in will continue. Thanks for listening!

non-economistOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:22 am

actually I suspect that he would have wanted to give an even larger number (such as 1 Trillion) but that it would have sounded sort of like saying that this is worse than the Great Depression (a.k.a. World Depression 1)…

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:24 am

Greenpeace has come out with a spending plan as well – it would also help the environment, not just the economy.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:27 am

The FED statement will be more important as to where the market goes since it will meet market expectations at 50bps

DRBOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:28 am

- Substantial rise in hedge fund implosions as redemptions mount- Collapse and contagion in emerging markets- Significant influx of defaults in the CDS market- Growing efforts to circumvent use of dollar as reserve currency (e.g. recent comments out of China/Russia)- Spike in corporate bond default rates (with subsequent impact on CDS market)Anyone got any others? Just throw ‘em into a hat and take your pick!

CaponeOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:30 am

thanks for the Cashin comments. It would have been better to fade his last call. So now this one do you follow or fade? It is a casino so flip a coin…

JimmyTheBankerOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:32 am

People have adjusted spending patterns to preserve fun perks. They now shop at Wall Mart and buy coffe at McDonalds instead of Starbucks.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:34 am

An important question – Apart from macro economic issues that make take some time to germinate – Things like the upcoming US election (whoever wins); a major political crisis e.g. China moves on Taiwan, Russia moves on Ukraine; a catastrophe like a major earthquake in California (USGS San Andreas Simulation (WMP video) ); more ‘surprises’ like Porche/VW; the consumer goes on strike, not likely (a one day wildcat at best) and then work to rule etc…

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:40 am

I traded IVV yesterday AM but wimped out early e.g. before 2pm (opportunity lost) – but today is a new day and we will try and select the correct entry and exit. Question – SGG Do you see an eventual breakdown in the coming months or do we muddle along in a wide trading range? Thanks

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:42 am

I doubt these:major political crisis e.g. China moves on Taiwan, Russia moves on UkraineBut this seems possible:a catastrophe like a major earthquake in CaliforniaPerhaps a sudden worsening of the global environment?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:42 am

Good observation, but these are “some” of the same people who are asleep behind the wheel and likely do not understand what is occurring around them. As a result, instead of saving for the coming storm, they are still living it up at college football games.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:43 am

actually you would get something- if done correctly- we would all benefit from improved infrastructure- on our roads, bridges, water supply etc… In the end I believe the house of cards will fall, but we might as well improve the infrastructure now while we still can, if we don’t we won’t be in a position to do it later. Just my 2 cents worth.

tgOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:55 am

Mr. Roubini,why not 2 trillion stimulus?Or even 3 trillion? Oh yes, 3 trillion sounds good. That would mean a new SUV for all the American citizens. That would be really great.

richinarOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:58 am

It may be that this would be the interim steps needed to get us into the next stage of recovery. People will need jobs soon and will take whatever is available. If the new leadership was to start multiple “stimulus” plans for the immediate needs and others for the long term needs we would start to see how things could unfold.I for one surely hope that we see many plans start up immediately after the election is over. Ultimately we need jobs for the short run and the long run. We need to return to a productive economy and find new things to sell to the rest of the world.

RedCreekOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:04 am

Could the next bubble be the USD? And when would it burst? And what if it bursts? Could this be the ultimate, final bubble?

JimyTheBankerOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:10 am

I agree. I speak all over the country and people think I am nuts for telling them to mkae sure they pay off their credit card debt each month and it is critical for them to manage their own lives, not let the the corrupt institution of wall street or the corrupt federal government do it for them! Everyone is “what about mine” and live to day becuse who knows what will happen tomorrow…sad, very sad.

CaponeOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:13 am

If I remember correctly, at a Euro conference a while ago, one of the Arab Country’s Finance Ministers said Euro world’s reserve by 2015. Many things have changed since that conference. I can only look at a chart and guess and I thought one interesting level in the dollar index was 90 as resistance. We did not quite make it there and have backed off. If it holds as resistance, IMHO we could begin to roll back down in short order…I believe also at the same Euro conference Fisher of the Fed is quoted with saying something to the effect of we are not aware of any shocks coming in the system. This was before all of this and the person who posed the question along those lines certainly had a clue about what may be coming. It would probably be an interesting text to read or video to watch now – can’t remember the date must have been over a year ago though…

StocksGoinGreenOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:15 am

Hey Guest, I see new lows coming. Wall Thief is still way too optimistic on earnins expectations for next year. We are moving from pricing in the credit bust to pricing in an economic bust. I still say 756 will be the bottom for the S&P early next year and if Obama does what he says he wants to, we may see a double-dip type event lasting into 2012 with the S&P bottoming around 600 or so in early 2012.

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:15 am

WHAT IN THE WORLD are they teaching in business school these days?!!why not 5, 10 trillion! We have been terrorized by the experts in government and the economists ever since the deficit hit 1 trillion and now it’s approaching 12 trillion with no end in site. Roubini and others totally contradict themselves when they keep finding sneaky ways to promote more spending by borrowing taxpayer’s money. Yet we NEVER have enough money for social security, healthcare, education, crime prevention, infrastructure, poverty, etc: If people don’t think a 3rd political party is necessary, then we truly are doomed to 3rd world status! And I see now that NR actually agrees with my prediction of DOW 6000! (30% down from current levels)!

RedCreekOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:16 am

Highbridge Capital, a US hedge fund that had US$35bn assets under management about 1.5 years ago, just closed down its European operations this morning and is firing 10% of its people in the US.

DaveWOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:16 am

I’m mildly offended by this comment. I did not “choose” to live paycheck to paycheck. My wife and I both work full-time jobs, live in a modest ranch-style home in a small town. I have one house payment and one credit card. With two kids, and rising food and utility bills, paycheck-to-paycheck has been forced upon us, not “chosen.”My money is just as “hard earned” as yours, but my dream of one day being able to provide a larger home for my family and set aside money for my childrens’ education is quickly fading thanks to our current economy. Now the dream is to make sure they have food on the table, clothes on their backs, and a warm place to sleep.I congratulate you on your obvious financial success, but do not assume that because some of us are just getting by that this is a “choice” we made. It comes across as somewhat arrogant.

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:18 am

I’d expect that they raise the rate by 50 bps. If it’s 25 or 50 bps then I don’t think you’ll see anything out of the market. It’s factored in.If you stop to think about it, the current market reaction is ridiculous. If the Fed was cutting from 5% to 4.5% then what’s happening now might make sense. But by the time they’re getting down to 1%, it’s “total desperation”. You’re seeing the Fed on the edge of losing all control on the US markets. Where’s the celebration in that? What we’ve got is total crisis management at this point is Washington DC, and no-one has the real answers.PeteCA

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:20 am

Sorry. 1′st sentence of last post should have said … I’d expect that they DROP the rate by 50 basis points.PeteCA

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:20 am

Are there jobs in this economy that former realtors can do? They might not have the required ability. We have many such people who could be newly unemployable.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:25 am

it is a casino but I love Cashin – Notwithstanding, I think I’m betting on SGG for the next while, SGG’s track record is not perfect but I suspect there is some serious depth behind those CAPS LOCK comments –

MOTHER of GOD is PISSED OFF!October 29th, 2008 at 10:30 am

My local Animal Rescue League has a webpage (with photos) to list new animals received and adoptable – it’s the page I see first when I open the web each day. Each profile says why the pet is there. Numbers listing “can’t afford, owner relinquished” are climbing.I know of no sadder economic indicator, and the next person who comes in here with their heart of stone blaming this mess on those who have long been getting so little pay they are forced to live paycheck-to-paycheck, is gonna get a virtual bloody beating from me!!Shame on people who blame the poor while the billionaires who created this nightmare get a pass! WHAT are you types thinking?! Do you even have brains?!The problem with UNLIMITED-FORTUNES-CAPITALISM has ALWAYS been the strangulation of consumption via severe INEQUALITY in the distribution of wealth, and workers are being robbed of their JUST wages and their JOBS.

tgOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:32 am

I think at a certain point of this crises all the major currencies should be pegged.During the next year we definitely will have a currency crises all around the world.I’m from Europe (Hungary). Currently my favourite currency is the USD, because you do not have debt in foreign currencies. Most of the rest of the world has and has problem get access USD. Swap lines providing liquidity, but it will not solve the problem in long term. Swap lines providing only a short term borrowing.During the money expansion of the USD the EUR/USD exchange rate went from 0.83 to 1.6. Noe we are on the way back, money is contracting in the rael economy. Banks are not willing to land as it happened in Japan the same way.But who knows what will happen if there will be several other stimulus package. Stimulus package is lending money to the consumer directly. Lending to consumer and paying back by tax payer.

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:33 am

Difficult to call it exactly, but I think we’re actually pretty close to a top on the US dollar, and also the long-awaited reversal in bond yields. In other words, long-term trend in US treasury prices is now downwards. See $UST on http://www.stockcharts.comSure looks like it has entered a downwards trading channel.We’ll see how it goes, esp. if the US markets go through another big nosedive in the future (e.g. after the next election). But US investors must now contemplate the possibility of falling stock values AND falling bond prices.PeteCA

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:37 am

Everyone does a lot of talking here but no one can explain how the rest of the world gets off of the dollar being the reserve currency. China holds 2 trillion in dollars, Russia 500 billion it goes on an on I mean who dares to make that first move? It would be financial Armegedon and all these dollar doom sayers keep talking but no one gives reasonable explanation as to how it could unfold or happen. It’s a joke at this point.A lot of dollar resenters out there but only big mouths.

tgOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:42 am

Today my country, Hungary got a bail out from IMF (and others) (25 billion dollars). It will definitely postpone our crises at least with one year. The country and the banking system can pay back the short term debt using this new available loan.If the economy crises will last long or will be very deep then I do not know what will happen afterwards.Our currency (Forint HUF) is 10% stronger against the EUR today as it was 3 days ago . So now is back to average. But in my view it is too strong. It will definitely not support capital inflow to Hungary.

StocksGoinGreenOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:44 am

Beware of the “Gap & Crap” that lies at $31.55 SSO or about 960 on the S&P 500 index. We could close that gap after the Fed meeting and then tank ater words. If not, then we hit 1,000 today.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:46 am

social security is already bankrupt and to the comment above about the 900 pound Gorilla in the room – Social Security is it.And to the comments on Roubini’s $400 bn stimulus – he has been consistent on this but he has also stated that higher taxes and reduced services will be the ultimate cost.It will be the fortunate few who in their senior years will be able to refer to as home, those dank and desolate buildings where western societies house their old.

ColinLaneyOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:47 am

> Until we see some empty seats at the gamesMost of those people bought their tickets months ago. At least, that’s the way it works at the U of AL.

economicminorOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:49 am

I am tired of self righteous people who think they are an island. I came up thru the system from very humble beginnings and I know not only how hard it is but realize how important my education was. There is also a certain amount of luck, a certain amount of genetics, a certain amount of who you grew up with and who you met along the way and where you grew up. I benefited from the roads and bridges and clean water and cheap resources. Everyone did. This IMO made America the greatest nation on earth.I just don’t understand the selfishness of people who don’t want to pay their fair share of this. Who want low taxes and high spending and pass the costs on to someone else. Inflation benefits those with access and or assets. It harms those who have little or none. So to spend and not tax, is just another way of transferring the burden to those who can least afford it.. This has been done for 25 or more years now and those who have benefited seem to sneer and look down their noses at those who they have used and abused.And this is a Christian Nation or even a god fearing one?

MNmomOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:51 am

GuestI respectfully disagree. Sports plays the function right now of helping people cope with the bad economy. Most people I talk to are hightly aware of what’s happening in the market. All they have to do is look at their 401K statements that lost over 40%!! People are past denial – alot of people I know are in between the bargaining states of grief and anger. When you are hit with a loss of 40%, believe me , you want a distraction from the pain.Sports will continue to play the role of helping people cope. No matter what it is, local or professional sports. Otherwise, there would be many more people with depression and/or mental breakdown. I agree with Mother of God,don’t blame the people you know who are not preparing for what’s ahead. Instead try to put yourself in their shoes. Easier said than done, I know.Remember too, most people are very uncomfortable talking about their finances.And, unless you ask them, how do you know they are not preparing? Maybe they set aside the money to go to games. BTW, I don’t go to professional games, it’s not an expense my husband and I care to make. For those who do go, it does make them feel better, it does help the economy a little (in the Twin Cities anyway). It is their free choice. If you want to nudge them toward preparing for the future, do it gently; hitting them over the head with criticism will not help at all.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:55 am

You are from Europe and your favourite currency is the USD? Great, isnt Hungary part of the EU? Dont you produce German cars in your nice little country, but you prefer USD? Now uncle Sam will help you, we send you our most famous little gift. From now on you can take pride in the words:IMF – I am fckudTake care, dont get hungry in Hungary :)

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:01 am

When the total outstanding foreign debt of the USA reaches a gazillion dollars and the country is really and truly only being maintained on life support and the forebearance of its “adversaries,” the latter call a meeting of the former Axis of Evil. Putin or someone stands up and says, “Ex-comrades, we know that without our patronage the real economy of the USA will collapse. We will make them a reasonable offer for their industrial plant in exchange for their worthless currency. If they do not accept, we will press a military challenge knowing that their industrial sinews are gutted and they will not even be able to beg let alone finance the spare parts for their fancy machines or even ready to eat meals for their troops.” And then the s… hits the fan.

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:02 am

Since 50 bps interest rate cut is already factored in the stock prices, an actual 50 bps cut today will move the market lower later today. Anyone thinks the market may go up after a 50 bps cut?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:10 am

The dollar is at this point stealing the productivity of the rest of the world but is not for the most part bennifiting the u.s. population only the weathy and government. Notice how the FED is allowing main street to deflate but ensure corporations and banks will survive, all to protect the dollar and power players.In the future I don’t see how the dollar can be backed by human capital and or productuvity since automation is taking over I think currencies will have to be backed by industrial commodities which will be the only thing limited in supply.Previously the break down of BW and other major monetary decisions were made in emergency predictaments, what’s interesting is that this time the U.S. would be on the loosing side of a major monetary policy shift and given with the U.S. military might it will be interesting to see how things plays out. We could see a slow 10 to 20 year death of the U.S. dollar or an emergency intervention that could result in wars.

JimmyTheBankerOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:16 am

I disagree, now, after the last 8 years, there is no Social Security problem. You see, now that home equity is all gone and 401K’s are down roughly 60% in real terms since 2000, no one can retire and if no one can retire…YOU GOT IT! They can’t collect Social Security, if they can’t collect Social Security, there is no problem. You see, I believe this is all a nice neat packge for government dependency for the next 30 years…

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:17 am

That’s ridiculous Russia has been a gutted impoverished bankrupt nation following the cold war but I never saw another nation challenge them millitarily. Ya ever heard of nuclear war heads, they’re bought and paid for and can mimic the destructive equivalence of a trillion man army and then some. I can assure you no one will challenge the U.S.

aleister perduraboOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:21 am

“The €30bn hit is thought to be one of the heaviest losses on a single company’s shares ever taken by hedge funds, which have already been hit hard by the turmoil in the markets.”This is without question the biggest single loss on a single stock in the history of hedge funds. It’s a bloodbath,” said Laurie Pinto, a broker at North Square Capital, a division of Winterflood.Porsche’s disclosure on Sunday that it held 74pc of the car maker – rather than the previously assumed 42.6pc – prompted a huge scramble to cover short positions in Volkswagen, which had been the most shorted stock in Germany’s benchmark DAX index.With less than 6pc of the shares available to buy, VW soared as high as €1,005 in early trading yesterday, having already tripled in value on Monday. The shares, which closed at €210 on Friday, ended the day at €945.One hedge fund said: “There have been some dark moments over the past few months but none blacker than this. We couldn’t have dreamt a worse scenario.”http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/transport/3275846/Funds-lose-24bn-as-VW-shares-take-off.html

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:22 am

Hmmm…Vietnan, successfully challenged….Russia, challenges us in Georgia…can’t get that darned military victory in Iraq or Afghanistan. Wake up, Son.

StocksGoinGreenOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:27 am

HERE WE GO! They are goonna close the gap into the Fed meeting and then, depending on what happens, we either rally to 1000 s&P today or we tank and retrace 50% of the gains from yesterday.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:32 am

When Nouriel finally does his calculations correctly, he will see what a pathetic drop in the bucket $400 billion really is. It would not increase economic activity IN THE SLIGHTEST.Ha ha! What is the value of an increase in the level of scrutiny for housing, from minimum to direct scrutiny?About $8 trillion.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:32 am

Where to go? As the U.S. economy has become increasing dependent on credit interest rates have had to be increasingly lowered over time and now we are running out of room so we resort by kicking out the middle man and his spread who doesn’t want the risk anyway. So ultimately the FED will become the lender of only resort and be forced to continually lower interest rates and after that completely breaks down which it will total socialism will quickly follow. No one wants to hear this but we are on a fast train to socialsim for about 200 reasons.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:32 am

positive news on GM and CerberusGM, Cerberus agree that GM CEO Rick Wagoner would lead merged automaker; final form of deal will depend on availability of financing, including government support: sources 12:29pm EDT

JamesOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:33 am

I just want to say if there is a $400 billion bailout for infrastructure development, Please, NO contractors getting rich off this, like what happened in Iraq! Please! All this money needs to go to people and small businesses. No bailout profiteers! The worst thing that could happen is that some Halliburton subsidiary gets a billion dollar contract and subcontracts down to some company who hires minimum wage people. That economic model is dead, dead, dead!

MandarinOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:35 am

It’s debatable whether this is a dollar crisis, a Euro crisis, Forint crisis etc. Whatever the case, it’s clear that the volume of debt backed currency in the western world has exceeded by many times the ability of the economy to sustain it. We can’t measure stock prices or values as if we were dealing with a stable currency. All values for all capital instruments, securities etc. have inflated past the system’s limit. Equities are going to deflate because they are priced in “old dollars,” the ones that were supposed to maintain the debt pyramid. The closest and best analogy is the GD when the Dow fell more than 80%. I agree completely that reflation is not an option and if theG-7 try some kind of trick gold and commodities will go on the rampage. And without that kind of co-conspirated action my guess is that the dollar is at the root of the problem, that it will very, very soon be toast again –not the Euro or whatever.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:35 am

By the way, expect a VERY negative statement out of the Fed when it uselessly lowers interest rates. The Fed has been given the job of breaking the bad news because it no longer has any power. Look for the Government to hide behind these nominally powerless institutions such as the Fed and the FDIC. Who elected Bair social mediator? Nevertheless, that’s where she is, because no one else is able to break the bad news in the political system.I’m still working on that broad. Nearly got her to the point of saying, “Any solution to the housing crisis MUST include new rights in housing.”

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:38 am

It will tank, because the Fed will give simply dreadful news about the economy. No more fiddling around for them. They’re a social welfare agency now. Now they only GAIN by painting a black picture, which they will do.This will be the signal for the next serious down leg for the market. Imagine! People are buying oil! Living in the past, fighting the previous war.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:40 am

This will be a long post. I think there is a lot of fuss about details and not to the point as to causation and cures. Here is the quote from Marriner Eccles as to how income inequality leads to Depression.This is a quote from Marriner Eccles the wealth distribution in the US is comparable to the Ivory Coast. Truly a disaster waiting to happen in a country with civil liberties and a free press. Looking athttp://seekingalpha.com/article/98769-our-coming-depression . To see what happened to private debt under Bush._Eccles Quote_______________________________As mass production has to be accompanied by mass consumption, mass consumption, in turn, implies a distribution of wealth — not of existing wealth, but of wealth as it is currently produced — to provide men with buying power equal to the amount of goods and services offered by the nation’s economic machinery. [Emphasis in original.]Instead of achieving that kind of distribution, a giant suction pump had by 1929-30 drawn into a few hands an increasing portion of currently produced wealth. This served them as capital accumulations. But by taking purchasing power out of the hands of mass consumers, the savers denied to themselves the kind of effective demand for their products that would justify a reinvestment of their capital accumulations in new plants. In consequence, as in a poker game where the chips were concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, the other fellows could stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit ran out, the game stopped.That is what happened to us in the twenties. We sustained high levels of employment in that period with the aid of an exceptional expansion of debt outside of the banking system. This debt was provided by the large growth of business savings as well as savings by individuals, particularly in the upper-income groups where taxes were relatively low. Private debt outside of the banking system increased about fifty per cent. This debt, which was at high interest rates, largely took the form of mortgage debt on housing, office, and hotel structures, consumer installment debt, brokers’ loans, and foreign debt. The stimulation to spend by debt-creation of this sort was short-lived and could not be counted on to sustain high levels of employment for long periods of time. Had there been a better distribution of the current income from the national product — in other words, had there been less savings by business and the higher-income groups and more income in the lower groups — we should have had far greater stability in our economy. Had the six billion dollars, for instance, that were loaned by corporations and wealthy individuals for stock-market speculation been distributed to the public as lower prices or higher wages and with less profits to the corporations and the well-to-do, it would have prevented or greatly moderated the economic collapse that began at the end of 1929.The time came when there were no more poker chips to be loaned on credit. Debtors thereupon were forced to curtail their consumption in an effort to create a margin that could be applied to the reduction of outstanding debts. This naturally reduced the demand for goods of all kinds and brought on what seemed to be overproduction, but was in reality underconsumption when judged in terms of the real world instead of the money world. This, in turn, brought about a fall in prices and employment.Unemployment further decreased the consumption of goods, which further increased unemployment, thus closing the circle in a continuing decline of prices. Earnings began to disappear, requiring economies of all kinds in the wages, salaries, and time of those employed. And thus again the vicious circle of deflation was closed until one third of the entire working population was unemployed, with our national income reduced by fifty per cent, and with the aggregate debt burden greater than ever before, not in dollars, but measured by current values and income that represented the ability to pay. Fixed charges, such as taxes, railroad and other utility rates, insurance and interest charges, clung close to the 1929 level and required such a portion of the national income to meet them that the amount left for consumption of goods was not sufficient to support the population.This then, was my reading of what brought on the depression.Current levels of debt have risen under Bush from a little under the peak of the Great Depression to 350 x GDP. Even with lax credit standards, government support what the current crisis says is that private levels of Debt are unsustainable. Public levels are not nearly at anything like this level.____________________________________Markets do two things to deal with debt bubbles if uncontrolled Weimer Germany had hyperinflation and we had Depression. Note that people should be focusing on the aggregate levels of debt and the relatively high interest rates the public pays as compared to say Japan not the proximate misregulation which caused the immediate crisis. Robert Frank showed how a kind of trickle down leads to insatiable demand for debt amongst the people who have less money.We need to do two things, none of which is popular in the Fragmented US society which tolerates poverty well politically if you don’t interfere. First revoke the Reagan Tax cuts. Secondly, have massive government investment in productive enterprise, jobs, education, and infrastructure. Alternative energy is a good investment in the long term for sure but whether or not is best at the moment remains to be seen.——————————Should massive hyperinflation occur, a possibility. We would need to try to enforce a Bretton Woods type agreement. Such might be impossible in todays world. It might be a good idea in any case

VigilantOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:43 am

All of your comments are respected and valid. Some people may be season ticket holders, or only occasional attend games. Certainly there is an entertainment value in all of this. I wonder what percentage of these folks are the same type of people who are still eating out every other night, shopping on the weekends, buying cars, etc… Statistics (now there’s a term) suggest that consumers are pulling back on their spending. That could suggest a seperation of classes. One class that may be distitute or financially savy, and the other class that demonstrates financial recklessness or mainstream ignorance.If one is truly connected with what is occurring, they should be cutting expenses where possible. Mr. Roubini has not been wrong about too many things over the past year. If he is suggesting things may get considerably worse, then the prudent thing to do is take the necessary precautions to protect yourself and family.

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

Agreed, I don’t know what NR’s and others logic is here unless they really don’t understand the gravity of the situation and figure the govt. will just keep on spitting $400 billion lugees into the bucket until something good happens!

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

How can Americans compete with low wage foreign workers? Manufacturing, IT, engineering, R & D, and anything else that isn’t nailed to floor has been offshored.Global competitiveness is nothing more than a euphemism for cheap labour and lower environmental standards in less regulated markets.Trade policies and Trade Agreements have given Corporate America license to exploit every advantage of globalization, while sucking wealth out of the US.

ConfusedinCOOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:09 pm

would somebody be willing to explain what happened here in layman’s terms? I’m not an investor, and don’t understand

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

no one can retire and if no one can retire…YOU GOT IT! They can’t collect Social Security, if they can’t collect Social Security, there is no problem

I do not know whether I should laugh or cry but sounds so true.Besides the government could just cut the military spending for 2 years and cover most of the SS money that way…

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:18 pm

This is one of the 200 reasons socialism is the only answer going forward, the biggest reason though is that there’s an inverse relationship between capitalism and technology.

JimmyTheBankerOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

Did anyone see the Bloomberg article today about the “easing of the credit crisis? Nestle’, teh largest food company in the world, had to agree to price its line of credit to Libor plus a bank spread PLUS it credit defualt swap spread! Their new rate on money drawn will be over 12%! Yeah, this will help everything!! Get ready for an earnings depression…

GarboOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:28 pm

I think we’re in that “Time Tunnel” vortex and the resonances with the 30′s are going to become unmistakeable…thrift and the general store…natural fabrics…forged steel automobiles running on leaded gas refined from Texas crude. It wasn’t all bad. New Orleans jazz, then swing; Busby Berkeley.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

Sorry my socialist friends but you do not understand “infastructure” in government speak. Infrastucture will mean more money for the education infrastucture( read teacher’s unions), community outreach( read ACORN), the environment (government studies) etc. Very little will go to roads, bridges and sewers. What does go will be bogged down in lawsuits. A waste of money.

GMOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:39 pm

MORE THAN THAT.Negative Interest Rates !!!Imagine being paid to borrow…anything to stimulate the economy….CLEAR!!

MarkOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:47 pm

The depression era wasn’t accompanied by massive trade deficits. The GD was primarily an internal affair. Today it’s a global consideration; today’s puppet masters don’t have the clear shots that they did during the GD…

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:50 pm

What I am about to say is not directed at you or anyone personally, but I believe it needs to be said in no uncertain terms. I take issue with the substance of your comments on Dr. Roubini’s recommendation for a second fiscal stimulus package.First, it’s not YOUR money. The fact that you earn it doesn’t make it yours. The 16th Amendment to the Constitution says the income you earn is all subject to taxation. Our democratically elected Congress decides what portion of the money you and I generate as income should go to the government for its spending needs.Second, it is Congress — not you and I –that determines what constitutes the general welfare, and how the taxes we pay are to be spent. If we don’t like the determinations they make, and we can convince a majority of the citizenry to do so, we can elect other folks to office who may make different decisions respecting how we are taxed, and by how much, and how those taxes will be spent.Third, all taxation is by its very nature redistributive. Money is taken from individuals to benefit the country as a whole. Our federal taxes are used to pay for roads and bridges and so forth that we may never have occasion to utilize ourselves. They are used to pay for military ventures that we may not support. They are used to provide supplemental income through social security to elderly people we don’t know. They are used to pay for the education of other people’s children. They are used to cover medical expenses for the old, the disabled, and the poor. In short, they are used for the GENERAL welfare, not for your welfare or my welfare per se.What Dr. Roubini is proposing is a fiscal stimulus package targeted to repairing and modernizing our dilapidated national infrastructure, which has been utterly neglected throughout the last three decades of Congressional restructuring of federal tax burdens in a manner that has favored the wealthiest of Americans while utterly neglecting the falling standards of living of middle class Americans. When, as now, aggregate demand from the private sector — consumers or businesses — is declining precipitously and threatening the health of the entire economy, it is absolutely appropriate as a matter of public welfare for the government to step in and create aggregate demand through expenditures on much-needed public works projects, which create jobs, stimulate consumer and business spending, and result in lasting roads, bridges, and other tangible benefits for the country as a whole.SWK

MarkOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:54 pm

The infrastructure is crumbling because it has NO future! Not in an oil-deprived world: nor in an alternative-energy world, a world which will demand (as does nature) less travel and shipment of goods.NOTE: the more people spend attacking the “other” side means the more they are distracted from actually doing something, which means that I can more readily go about MY business :-)

bcdogsOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:54 pm

Bloomberg and their *&^%$# video player…if any one has an outside link, please be kind enough to post. I have made a website comment to them about updating their video player, but have little hope that they will do so…

tgOctober 29th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

I’m certainly not in love with USD or in any other currency :) I expect rising the USD against the EUR further in a long term. That’s what I mean.

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:02 pm

It seems to me that Dr. Roubini always has provided a range of possible scenarios, the actualization of any one of which is always contingent on the happening or non-happening of certain events. That’s just wisdom talking. He’s admitted to the risk of a global depression, for example, but whether that worst-case happens will be a function of many other things. Like a physicist evaluating the trajectory of electrons in the classic double-slit experiment, Dr. Roubini must talk in terms of the probability of events, and that in itself makes what he has to say more credible and more valuable, in my view.SWK

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:02 pm

Absolutely amazing story. Talk about wild-eyed volatility causing huge losses. This takes the cake.PeteCA

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:02 pm

Nouriel’s comment shows just how irresponsible he is, and why Banerji of ECRI criticized. Spend it on “roads and bridges.” This shows that he has no understanding of how long such spending takes to get in the pipeline. He shows all the hysteria of the Harvard prima donna. In short, sheer silliness.Above all, it shows his COMPLETE ignorance of the massive corruption in the bond market. Many of these “bridge to nowhere” projects are suggested, not by government entities, but rather, by the bond market ITSELF, which wants to sell the bonds and manage the proceeds.It just shows that he has no conception of how life is lived in a society, and of course, no notion of its legal structure. How planners must be laughing at him! How rights advocates must be laughing at him!Not to mention being a bubble extender, this sort of stimulus is rife with corruption.The following book is a very good read about the corruption inherent in “public works” unregulated by any individually enforceable rights. It’s about New Jersey.The reason I pick New Jersey is because it is also the home of the Abbott right to education cases. Note the contrast in spending when the level of scrutiny is elevated for a right. Within its rather narrow sphere, the right to education in the New Jersey Constitution–which until the 1970s was regarded as basically meaningless mush and unenforceable–is now at about the level of strict scrutiny. Which means that individuals can FORCE the state to spend in a way which vindicates the right.There would be virtually no useless spending if the New Bill of Rights were enforced. We wouldn’t even need Nouriel’s piddling “stimulus” if the level of scrutiny for housing were raised. It would MANDATE the direction and extend of spending. This is the point: spending regulated by rights. That’s what the New Bill of Rights is all about. Only by raising the level of scrutiny for facts (which is what the New Bill of Rights does), can we keep corrruption from destroying the country.The Soprano State: New Jersey’s Culture of Corruption (Hardcover)by Bob Ingle (Author), Sandy McClure (Author) “In New Jersey’s super-corrupt atmosphere, nothing is sacred or beyond conversion to a patronage pit…” (more)25 Reviews5 star: (21)4 star: (2)3 star: (2)2 star: (0)1 star: (0)See all 25 customer reviews…(25 customer reviews)——————————————————————————–List Price: $24.95Price: $16.47 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25. DetailsYou Save: $8.48 (34%)Special Offers AvailableIn Stock.Ships from and sold by Amazon.com. Gift-wrap available.

BrianOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:04 pm

I have addressed this in a few prior threads.Put simply, it is the USA itself that will make the first move.The USA will have to print money to finance the bailouts. The USA has more USD than all creditors combined (read infinite).When the US dumps trillions of dollars, that will be the trigger event for other dollar holders to sell. That not only includes China and Russia, but it also now includes banks and other institutions that have been (or are being) “recapitalized” with government gifts (errr, loans and equity purchases, excuse me. Not gifts :-/ )Anyway, it does not take a break in the dollar cartel to crack the damn. All it takes is the hubris of the US government to bring the dollar down.Mark my words, the dollar crash will be the trigger event for the reordering of the entire financial world. It will be the final bubble to burst in this economic age, and it will herald the new world order (which I don’t advocate, I merely state realistically).

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:06 pm

Big deal. Fox News will always make a dung heap of a mountain out of a mole hill. This is just another distraction from real issues.SWK

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:07 pm

What does the Wall Street see that Main Street does not?We are looking at 5-10 years of 70′s style economics and rally?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:10 pm

so will businesses accept cash only?Several Moscow city centre restaurants are now refusing to accept cards in a move not seen since Russia’s last financial crisis almost a decade ago.Some automated teller machines at Sberbank, the country’s biggest state-owned bank, have also stopped accepting cards from other banks.Several electronics and mobile phone stores said they no longer accepted credit card purchases.Over the weekend, Aeroflot, the biggest Russian airline, announced it had stopped taking credit cards payments for flights except from a handful of banks

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:10 pm

Pete:I have to disagree with you on this one. There is a big difference between federal deficit spending that involves just handing out money to people to spend and targeting that spending for public works projects that make up for temporary but dangerous reductions in aggregate demand generated by the private sector. The latter form of fiscal stimulus can create private sector jobs, which generate real consumer spending, and leave us with some decent infrastructure that we can all benefit from either directly or indirectly.SWK

see.clayOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

They can cut it to 0 if they want, banks arent lending and if they do it is to people with extremely well documented incomes and credit histories and fico scores in the 800′s – the days of lending to everyone are over.My brother in law is a big money well connected real estate guy and cant get loans to buy condos right now so it is a pretty tough environment out there.The realization that needs to come about is that there will no longer be free loans for everyone, what good is a low interest rate if nobody can get money at that rate?

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:13 pm

Confused: Here’s what happened in a nutshell. Some investors, including large hedge funds, have been holding SHORT positions in stocks from Germany. They are actually speculating (or hedging) based on the German DAX, which is kinda like the Dow Jones index in Germany. Under this arrangement, they will make good profits if stock values drop, but they will take big losses if stocks rise in value. So, unexpectedly the stock price of Volkswagon soared to an enormous value, catching some of these investors offguard. Volkswagon is a main stock within the DAX index. They are supposed to watch these stock prices very carefully, and to exit their trades if things go against them. But it is still possible to be caught offguard if stock movements are wild (as during a massive “short covering” move). And that’s what happened. Apparently one hede fund has lost $30 billion because they took a position where they expected Volkswagon and other German stocks to go down, but it rose to great heights and cost them a lot of money. Pretty amazing incident.PeteCA

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:13 pm

the stimulus package is not a free handout, it is just taking from one hand to put into another – pay em now or pay em later, it is a zero sum game and you bear the burden of the stimulus next year when you settle up with sammy.

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:15 pm

dont ask him what he is teaching because he is spending more time being a media monger shooting star than he is teaching

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:16 pm

I saw in the news today where GMAC now wants to be re-classified as a “bank” so it is eligible for the special Paulson bailout package.I think I’m gonna’ throw up!PeteCA

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:16 pm

Well, I understand what the term ‘infrastructure’ means in Roubini-speak, and it means roads, bridges, sewers, and so forth. If the government were to spend the money on the sort of “soft infrastructure” to which you refer, then the impact would be less substantial.SWK

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:21 pm

it would not surprise me if the last weeks downwards movement by the euro have caused by politics rather than the market.ergo therefore that some sort of parity is being attempted for some reason.

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

It’s not a zero-sum game if it salvages the economy from collapse by making up for a drop in aggregate demand until the private sector can regain its ability to generate that aggregate demand. Once the economy has had time to regain normalcy, the deficit can be paid off through taxes and the people are left with new roads, bridges, etc.SWK

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:30 pm

Fed down 50-points, and US market already dropping.Just like I said … they’d sell it on the news.By the time Wall St is done with all these penny ante games, there’s gonna’ be no-one left who wants to buy into the market.PeteCA

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:32 pm

As I said above, VERY negative language from the Fed. Particular the point about consumer spending, shows that they know the basic problem is a decline in economic activity. There obviously has to be more intervention based on important FACTS: not bridges to nowhere, not dealing with some Harvardy “systemic risk” (you can take the student out of Harvard, but you can’t take Harvard out of the student), no more nonsense designed to keep the power structure in power.The FACTS. Maintain the FACTS. And let people do it themselves by giving them more RIGHTS. No more Nouriel ruling from the clouds. Kick the clowns off the clouds!FROM THE OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE:The pace of economic activity appears to have slowed markedly, owing importantly to a decline in consumer expenditures. Business equipment spending and industrial production have weakened in recent months, and slowing economic activity in many foreign economies is damping the prospects for U.S. exports. Moreover, the intensification of financial market turmoil is likely to exert additional restraint on spending, partly by further reducing the ability of households and businesses to obtain credit.

StocksGoinGreenOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

Here com da retrace then BOOM!!!! Boy, I don’t remember a time when a Fed statement was so gloomy!

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

Let me get this straight, SWK. What you’re saying is that the money that I earn because of the 16th Amendment and some other things you mention, now belongs to Henry Paulson. Just send the money and he and his lobbyist-bought Congress will decide who gets it.Succinctly, it’s essentially what Marx says: everything belongs to the state.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Notice that they say “economic activity” TWICE. This is the CENTRAL problem–not “systemic risk,” not that we don’t have enough bridges to nowhere.Let’s begin by nuking Harvard. Sound like a good idea? I think the systemic risk is located in Cambridge, Massachusetts. And I don’t mean the Necco factory!! (And I CERTAINLY don’t mean the Gardner Museum–are you aware that they apparently CUT THE VERMEER FROM THE FRAME when they stole it? this is worse than any depression). Even though Vermeer is kitsch.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

I think Canadian banks could potentially be in just as much difficulty if foreclosures increase in Canada. Concerned in Canada.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

I didn’t write The Soprano State, dummy. Instead, I wrote The Eminent Domain Revolt. What a wonderful book that is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

Gee and what would this do for Ambac? Oh I forgot. Ambac needs to get bailed out. Otherwise, there would be “systemic risk.” Clown! In short, the bubble is the system. So we have to keep the bubble going. The poison is sustaining us, so we have to keep taking more poison.SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Ambac Financial (ABK:AMBAC IncNews, chart, profile, moreLast: 2.63+0.36+15.86%2:47pm 10/29/2008Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolioAnalystCreate alertInsiderDiscussFinancialsSponsored by:ABK 2.63, +0.36, +15.9%) said on Wednesday that the U.S. government should back bond insurers through a two-part program of guarantees. The Treasury should provide a guarantee to bond insurers that covers portfolio losses that exceed a certain level. This would free up capital and help to get more credit flowing in the economy, Ambac said. The second part of the program would involve the Treasury directly guaranteeing existing securities. That would help bond insurers avoid losing more of their capital and create a liquid market for some securities that have become hard to sell, Ambac explained. Such a guarantee program is more flexible that the Treasury’s current plan, which involves buying troubled assets and investing directly in banks, Ambac added. Ambac shares climbed 9% to $2.48 during afternoon trading on Wednesday. Rival MBIA (MBI:MBIA IncNews, chart, profile, moreLast: 8.38+1.22+17.03%2:47pm 10/29/2008Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolioAnalystCreate alertInsiderDiscussFinancialsSponsored by:MBI 8.38, +1.22, +17.0%) rose 10% to 7.86 and smaller bond insurer Syncora gained 19% to 56 cents.PrintDisable Live QuotesSubscribe to RSSYahoo! Buzz

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:00 pm

@ GuestNo sir, I am not saying the money you earn as income belongs to Henry Paulson. What I am saying is that it belongs to the sovereign people of this country, who through their democratically elected representatives determine how it will be spend in the interests of the general welfare. That’s what the Constitution says, and the Constitution is tantamount to the contract that we, as Americans, have with one another that sets forth the terms and conditions for our self-governance.This is not Marxism. The state doesn’t own and control all property. You still have private property. You still keep some of your income. You don’t keep all of your income, but there is not a country on earth where citizens are not taxed to pay for government, or where every citizen agrees that every penny spent by the government is appropriate. What you seem to want is either anarchy or a libertarian pipe dream, and neither is what this country is all about, nor has it ever been.Your comment about Congress being influenced unduly by lobbying interests may be well-taken. I have opined in posts on previous threads that corporations have been afforded certain constitutional rights that only citizens were ever intended to have, and that as a result, we have lost a substantial degree of control over our political system and process. That, however, is a discrete problem that can be addressed without ignoring the fundamental framework set forth in the Constitution.SWK

MandarinOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:00 pm

This is the crash mechanism: bailouts become institutionalized and under Pres. Obama are marketed/advertised to a desperate public. With the connivance of the G7 and new/old Treasury Secretary Rubin ‘confidence’ is restored. For one calendar quarter the downward spiral in the economy seems to lessen. The fuse is when commodities stage a brief recovery and the dollar tanks; the explosion comes when the Fed sells even more Treasury debt to soak up the bailout money. Interest rates spike, the stock market crashes. Time frame: 9 months after inauguration.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:13 pm

Can GDP numbers be independently verified?In others words, if the government comes out tomorrow with a claim of 2% growth in GDP, who can verify that they are lying through their teeth as usual? Is this data available to economists, etc.?Thanks,

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:14 pm

The bubble is the whole welfare/casino capitialist state. The Welfare state is not sustainable. Casino Capitialism crashed under Bush and the ghastly welfare state will crash under Obama. Poetic justice I suppose.

2centsOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:15 pm

Just a passing thought … most recently “retired” Presidents soon go on a speaking tour. Do you think W has anything to say, and who will pay for the privledge of hearing that!

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

Bernanke’s like Willie Sutton. He steals where the value is. He represents the crooks – who just lifted trillions in the biggest taxpayer heist in history.If Bernanke were working for the people and the economy he would be restoring the principles of a contract society, property rights (fifth amendment), representative government (not ignoring voter calls yet listening to 42,000 lobbyists), hard work and saving for the future – in other words, all the values that built America. Every step Bernanke takes is a step to steal from pensioners, workers, small businessmen, savers, private property owners — the economy.Bernanke and his ilk are the enemy of the people, of a market economy based on contract and property rights. It’s so typical. America has a stock market, not run up on good news, but on press releases, timed announcements and rate cuts, in short, on bad news and hype. “Rate cuts” are a sign that the markets are in worse trouble than thought — yet the market soars.It’s like a company coming out with the news that it’s cutting 1000 employees who were producing things. The investment bankers cheer and the Dow hits the gong. And the economy sinks.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:18 pm

“If only they had listened….I tried to save them…Their vill was veak…I didn’t fail the American people, they failed me….History will absolve me.”

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

If you didn’t mean for Henry Paulson to have it, SWK, why is it that he has it (supported by our Professor)?

bcdogsOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:21 pm

If anyone has Vista for an OS and is using firefox with it, be advised that your problems may be solved by using IE to view…^%$&MSFT monopoly…

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

PAUL SOLMAN: We sat down with Taleb and the man he calls his mentor, mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot, pioneer of fractal geometry and chaos theory. And even more than feeling vindicated, they’re both scared.NASSIM NICHOLAS TALEB: I don’t know if we’re entering the most difficult period since — not since the Great Depression, since the American Revolution.PAUL SOLMAN: The most serious situation we’ve been in since the American Revolution?http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/10/pbs-video-taleb.html#comments

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

WILL THE SMART PEOPLE ANSWER THIS Q: If we have been able to keep our system going by borrowing $12 trillion in debt, then why not keep adding to it? What is the amount of debt that will break the camel’s back: $15/20/25/50? And why not just give all 50 million working families $1 million each ($50 trillion) at a guaranteed 6% interest for life and eliminate all government programs including income tax and allow us to pay for our own health care, education, retirement etc?Wouldn’t that also make our companies more competitive in the global economy?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

That’s a good rap, I mean it. But when was the stock market ever anything than a tulip bulb factory? And let’s face it, those values of hard work, keeping your promises, temperance and husbandry — they’re great, but they don’t make you rich. And that’s what they people wanted. Since there can only be one at the top of a pyramid, most people got the soft soap and now, the shaft.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

Interesting notion, no they’re different in all dimensions physical and notional. Just coincidence here I think.

MandarinOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:29 pm

It’s funny given the raft of people saying what a great “buying opportunity” the last plunge was. Who’s going to step up and publicly call this little bulge a great “selling opportunity?”My God, being bullish on the market is the equivalent of Americanism. No – it’s the equivalent of being bullish on God.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:32 pm

FED opening swap lines with EEM countries Mexico, Brazil, SIN and Korea through April 1009 – don’t worry though these economies are doing just fine – to paraphrase the Fedand thanks SGG — a good day butI wimped out 5 minutes ago

2centsOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:33 pm

All B schools teach the craft of operating at maximum efficiency while delivering maximum extracted value. All other factors are only relevant as to how they impact the numbers. Given that, did you expect there to be compassion and common sense involved?

MandarinOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:38 pm

That would take us back to 1981 (figuring we reached the peak in 2007). The Dow was at about 800. Not likely, but certainly not impossible. An 80% decline which we had in 1929-32 would be Dow 2800.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 2:46 pm

Beyond the scope of imagination. Plausible. Must run computer simulation. You should write a sci/fi story or utopian novel with this as premise.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:00 pm

GE suggests revenue -15% but will try to keep profits flat… nice – there is a God if your objective is revenge on the CNBC dimwits that torture us all day

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Yes. The point is, if flooding the market with fiat money is good at this rate, then wouldn’t it be better to flood the market with fiat money every day, at a higher rate?

PeteCAOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Those people who follow Austrian economics will recognize the phrase “crack up boom”. It’s the final stage of a melt-up (followed by collapse) in an economy based on fiat currency, after a previous explosion of credit.Well guess what?* We’ve now got the Fed sitting at 1% interest rates and offering US dollars in unlimited supplies.* And we’ve got thousands of stressed out hedge fund managers who are struggling just to survive – or maybe win big on their last GREAT speculative play.* And we’ve got most normal investors in the world sitting on the edge of their seats in a state of high anxiety, not sure where the global economy is going to recover – or roll over dead.Sounds like a great recipe for a “Crack-Up Boom” to me.PeteCA

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Regarding youtube site I mentioned, you must first select “advanced” to be able to fill in the search options I have recommended.

tutterfrutOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:07 pm

No wonder the gaming industry has a hard time…if you have to compete with the stockmarkets nowadays

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/October 29th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

ROTFL!!! Who needs a Casino to gamble! Just “invest” into stocks!

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

Actually that’s feasible: a central computer (government run) could continuously input a deflator that would be electronically sent to every scanner and cash register in every place of business…or alternately, if you prefer, an electronic market could determine the deflator from moment to moment and smooth out the prices at the point of purchase.Really no different than the current system, fairer and more transparent!

CaponeOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

draw a line across the tops of the recent highs in JNJ and MCD and see the RESISTANCE ! right to it and back DOWN ! if they break through this resistance to the upside, 10,000 and higher. IF NOT and I do not believe the golden archers are made of gold and I have not heard their real estate is on top of massive oil reserves, we are goinghad to step away while the market was up almost 200 points and pick up this note from here…a tear just rolled down my face upon seeing this close…

2centsOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

The new bubble is now floated. We used to have long term players, short term players, day traders, ultra-short term players, margin players, ultra-levered players, hedged players, etc. Now we have hyper in/out players. Not a bad way to make a living – 4% today. No need to mess with covering your shorts or expiring options etc. Seems like you’d have to know what orders are queued up in the system though.

P1AQLOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:19 pm

Wot? Another kind cut? Am 10% in equities now. I figured since I escaped the 40% meltdown i.e. 1/0.6 -1= 66% relative gain, even if my committed 10% goes down to zero (midnight black swan), my portfolio will be still be up 0.9/0.6-1=50%Now that’s what you call Alpha!Enjoy the ride!P1AQL.

ChineseOrangeOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:21 pm

This is a lunatic idea, and I’m getting dizzy. If this is just a slightly far-fetched picture of how the world works today, I can see how people would demand anything – any alternative that would bring stability.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:23 pm

True about most there, but not Santelli – the guy is honest, credible and has the best insights. Above all he’s street smart and calls it as he sees it. Unlike most of the bobble heads at CNBC he spent 20 years in the pits and as an exec in that industry.

M'darinOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

Whoever has the fastest computer processor with the deepest memory and the quickest transmission to the exchange wins. And no money ever need change hands. In fact, no money is required at all. The hand is quicker than the eye, wink wink, no Fed or G Man will notice. Let’s extend the privilege to everyone.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:27 pm

what happened at the close?!? I went away to lunch with the market firmly in the green, and came back to see it plunged *400* points in 15 minutes?!? What did I miss???(The Penne Rosa was delicious, by the way)

GregGoingRedOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:28 pm

It’s the final stage of a melt-up

That’s an interesting term; a bose-einstein condensate flows up and out of its beaker with the appearance of dripping through the beaker. So maybe that Large Hadron Collider thing really is the root cause.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:34 pm

Fed announces new credit lines with foreign banksWASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that it will supply new lines of credit to the central banks of Brazil, Mexico, South Korea and Singapore to help those countries deal with the global credit crisis.The Fed will provide up to $30 billion to each of the central banks. It is the latest in a series of “swap” arrangements where the Fed provides dollars in exchange for reserves of the other nations’ currencies.http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081029/fed_credit_crisis.html

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

the problem is I’m not a dummy…you lose credibilty again….Most people on this site share the shame feeling, sorry to inform you….

CaponeOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

if you are technical at all or not, please see the jnj and mcd charts, draw the line across the recent tops and tell me what it looks like.looks like technical SELL paradise to me…do commodities split with stocks NOW ?stocks closing… awe forget it…

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:44 pm

Henry Paulson is the Secretary of the Treasury, was nominated to the post by the President, who was duly elected pursuant to the Constitution. Mr. Paulson then was confirmed by the duly elected members of the U.S. Senate. He is fifth in line to succeed President Bush as President of the United States, after Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, pursuant to the Presidential Succession Act. He has been delegated lawful authority by the Congress to spend public funds.What’s your point? Mr. Paulson has a personal net worth of several hundreds of millions of dollars. It’s not like he’s spending public funds on himself or without lawful authority. This is how representative governments work.SWK

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:47 pm

Trust in our fiduciaries has been lost. It cannot be regained with rate cuts and fed currency swap mechanisms. The smoke has left the bottle…it cannot be replaced.

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:50 pm

How is this any different than continuously supplying a heroin addict? You know they’ll become dependent on you, never pay you back and eventually die maybe taking others with him!

KJ FoehrOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

I understand your point and generally agree. I was just surprised when NR put a start and end date on the recession today. I don’t remember him doing that quite so clearly. Previously he had been talking about an 18 to 24 month recession without specifying the starting point, so it was easy to suppose that it could be 18 to 24 months from NOW, which would mean closer to the middle of 2010 rather than the end of 2009.Saying that we are nearly half way through a severe recession already certainly makes it seem much less scary / painful / damaging to me. I mean we haven’t really seen anything yet in terms of negative GDP, serious unemployment, corporate defaults, earnings declines, etc. So saying all these things will come and go by the end of next year makes them much less momentous to me.And if the stock market is going to anticipate the end of the recession during the summer of ’09, then it hardly seems worth the effort to short the market any longer! One might as well hold on to some longs and wait for the bear market to end. But I don’t think things are going to unfold that quickly. It has taken us 18 months from the first signs of real trouble in the Spring of 2007 just to get to this point. And now the contraction is going to end in just another 12 months? I doubt that…If it took 18 months to get to what looks to me like just the end of the beginning, then it is going to take MUCH longer than another 18 months to get to the end of this recession.

PeterJBOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

““The only way to increase aggregate demand is going to be through” government spending on roads, bridges and other infrastructure, Roubini said at a Bloomberg conference in New York. “We need a huge plan, $300 billion is not going to be enough. I think we’re going to need a plan of $400 billion to $500 billion.”@ RoubiniSorry Professor, this still will not cut it although you appear to be getting my message albeit slowly.I have posted here that which needs to be done… but this cute little benanke-like-stimulus will do nothing but make things worse.Ho hum

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

Bose-einstein condensate borders (or perhaps Bohrders)on the mystical…no need for quantum physics here, just follow the money. The game’s rigged I tells ya, it’s as simple as that.

CaponeOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:04 pm

Any thoughts on substantial divergence between equity and commodity today ?One thing I do not like about sell off today is its similarity to Monday’s scary close in the last 10 minutes… Scare the heck out of longs, make shorts happy and then continue rally – shakeout? Above technical MCD and especially JNJ argues otherwise…

MandarinOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

I think our friend is onto something. If, in the short term, stock prices are set by market makers to assure their marginal profit at the expense of public buyers and sellers, then the “market” mechanism has a built-in defect. In times of great uncertainty/crisis/panic the market-making mechanism magnifies the swings and becomes an independent and destabilizing force. When the oscillation is great enough or the resonant frequency of the disturbance is hit, the machine breaks down entire or (in ebullient times) breaks out. That in a nutshell is the Kass-Kepler Postulate as stated in Karl Kauss’ 1900 classic, “Endogenous Theory of Market Panics.”

DRBOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:06 pm

No it doesn’t. There is no cause and effect anymore, there is no connection between what the stock market did yesterday, what it did today, and what it’ll do tomorrow. You can no longer attribute any degree of rationality to the way it moves. If ever the stock market was a random walk, now is that time.The Dow could jump 800 points, or fall 1000 and neither outcome would surprise me.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/October 29th, 2008 at 4:14 pm

See on another forum: “Paulson and Bernanke’s new ppplan, close the markets 15 minutes early..roflmao..” — Rockford

Guest-O-RamaOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:18 pm

Ken Fisher would say even if the first spend is stupid the next 4 spends will be normal. How is it not going into the economy in a constructive way if it goes to a construction worker who gets taxed and then with the $ he pays for his son’s ice cream cones, and then it gets taxed a bit at the ice cream shop and pays the rent on the ice cream shop which pays a banker and someone who holds the mortgage on the ice cream shop etc… I mean high paying technical jobs for all would be nice but you have to have the industries to produce those jobs and we aren’t going to have them right away…Not that I’m a big fan of Ken but I think he has a point there…

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:19 pm

Imagine vast piles of hot money moving from country to country on rumors of Icelandic/Hungarian style currency crises, flowing into and out of the USA looking for any port in the storm. In the early stages of international currency crisis the dollar goes up, US stocks wobble but rally, commodities continue their secular decline/recession expectation.Then lo and behold the Fed or Treasury announces another bailout or another extension of emergency authority. Vast piles of money leave the USA, the dollar weakens, the equity rally stalls, commodities strengthen. I think that’s where we are now.US equities and commodity prices will likely diverge tomorrow unless something — who knows what — notches up our monetary authorities’ approval rating. The divergence will become stronger or weaker depending on the credibility of the authorities in the US versus other countries (I think!)

Guest-o-RamaOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:24 pm

Dog show entries are down this year by close to 20%. In part this is due to the RV culture and those folks can’t afford gas for their big rigs to take 10 german shepherds or 50 mini poodles a couple of states away. I think you’re seeing it in people not buying SUVS and the crash of the US auto industry. Look at all the for sale signs on the houses. If you look around you’ll see it. Try asking the person at your alma mater in charge of development how many gifts they’re getting this year or how much their endowment’s shrunk or if they’re worried at state schools about students bailing because parents can’t afford tuition hikes. You’ll see it.

Guest-O-RamaOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

I thought it was just a massive short covering rally anticipating what the fed’s news might do (yesterday) and today they realized they were ok to be short and eventually this puppy’s gonna crash so they might as well get back in their shorts…

Guest-O-RamaOctober 29th, 2008 at 4:41 pm

I think the thinking is that it would be better not to have 20 million people unemployed and tons of small businesses close.What I don’t get is just who is going to borrow at this new rate. If what people borrow to buy are cars and everyone’s got em, and houses and there’s a surplus…Seems this latest deflationary move only helps our exports and pushes down the dollar (irritating since I wanted to go overseas for Xmas). But what do we have to export. Some food…Some machinery-a wee bit. Not sure If I lived in China that I’d buy a chevy if I could buy a Tata.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:13 pm

The unleashing of the Treasuries will show you the endgame quite clearly. It’s highly destabilizing. The snake has begun to eat its tail.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:20 pm

Here’s the Federal Government trying to stick another finger in another dike. Investors will rush to the exits once they realize that the currency race to the bottom is well under way. However, as the man said, “deleveraging will not be denied.” And because that is true, the currency race to the bottom will proceed.

JohnRyskampOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:20 pm

Mexico’s Currency Rises After Fed Agrees to Provide $30 BillionBloomberg – 8 minutes agoBy Valerie Rota Oct. 29 (Bloomberg) — Mexico’s peso rallied after the US Federal Reserve said it agreed to provide the Mexican central bank with $30 …

crgordonOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:22 pm

Do you have a link? I could only find a plan to delay quotes for 15 minutes but nothing on closing early by 15 minutes.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:26 pm

I sent money to Charlotte Dennett’s campaign for Attorney General of Vermont. If she gets elected, Bush will be prosecuted for his crimes. GO CHARLOTTE GO!

fedwatcherOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:35 pm

Now that the Fed Funds rate is 1.0% and the discount rate is 1.25%, a tool has been lost from the Fed’s tool belt.Look for the markets to weaken as this sinks in.

MarkOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

Unfortunately, defense manufacturers employ a lot of people; and, they export a lot. I agree to cut here, but we should understand that it won’t come at cost as well :-( )

ex VRWCOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:48 pm

This is actually true. I work in embedded systems, and a company we talked with was developing real-time operating system technology to minimize the amount of time it took to receive, reason, and respond to an input stimulus. The application was computerized trading, and their software and market was based on the premise that a few milliseconds could make the difference between gaining or losing millions.Imagine that – our technology that should be turned to such applications as safety-critical control systems, medical advances, etc instead harnessed to support the Wall Street casino.

ex VRWCOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:53 pm

And how much is that thirty dollars now – 1,000,000,000,000,000 pesos? Wait, that’s tomorrow. Today it is thirty pesos!

Inquiring minds want to knowOctober 29th, 2008 at 5:55 pm

Will we still have TV when there’s no point in advertising anything for sale anymore?

AnonymousOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:03 pm

Abolish The FED. Dismantle the private Banking scheme that has run this country into all kinds of convoluted quagmires of sludge and dismantled the fundamental principles of our constitution. What is next, a police state.!!?? Looks like a repeat of 1770′s and 1960′s. We gotta keep our heads, pay attention and get involved. The Finacial sector and our treasury have been corrupted by the FED. That stinking privatized institution that is basicly a Cartel has so much power! They are tearing the shirts off of people’s backs! Weakening the country.The Cheneys, the Rumfelds, Greenspans, AIG, Fannies, are traitors. The whole thing is sickening.

Octavio RichettaOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:08 pm

I posted the Gross piece before reading it. The above is a confirmation of what I have said here a zillion times; smart people, including our dear Professor and Mr. Gross see the future too fast. The Professor saw the recession coming too soon; Gross started moving into debt riskier than treasuries too soon as well. However, his strategy will start to pay out [hopefully] in the near future. Gross’ PTTRX remains the largest position in my portfolio and the largest disappointment.

SharmaOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:09 pm

It is fascinating to read Prof. Roubini’s articles and observe his predictions come true one after another. He has been correct so many times that one is inclined to give him the status of a prophet. But one question which comes to mind repeatedly is where does the war expenditure fit in all this economic mess? The three trillion dollar war can not be ignored as an event of no significance in this global crisis. Arguments of political/ethical correctness aside, the war has been a major economic project which has dominated the economic era so thoroughly analyzed by Prof. Roubini. Apart from its stated (wrongly) objective, it surely had an unstated agenda of domination over the regional material and other resources. So if the economic significance of its execution and lack of fulfillment of its objectives are ignored they make the analysis incomplete and less holistic. Considering that Prof Roubini has arrived at his profound and prophetic conclusions through holistic analysis (according to his own words), it is difficult to imagine that he has not included such a major economic misadventure in any of his commentaries. Whereas he does deserve genuine admiration for his brave assertions in face of so much adversity, it does appear that he is not frank enough with regard to a very important portion of his economic analysis.

DocBergOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:13 pm

@SWK, Most real property in the United States is held in the fee simple form. We basically rent its use from the government in the form of taxes. If we were to have truly private property owned by the individual, it would have to be in the form of allodial property. In this sense, the federal government really does own everything, and this was done long before Marx.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:25 pm

Gross hopes simultaneous explosions of fission and fusion will cancel out. I kinda doubt the detonation of 2 different nukes will lead to a somewhat different outcome. LOL.”

GloomyOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:31 pm

RACING TO ZEROBloomberg headlines tonight:•Fed Cuts Key Rate to 1% as Central Banks Race to Avert Worldwide Recession•Stocks in U.S. Decline on Speculation Fed’s Rate Cut Won’t Rescue Economy•Fed Opens Swaps of $30 Billion Each With Korea, Brazil, Mexico, Singapore•Bank of Japan May Be Obliged to Lower Rates After Investors Anticipate Cut•China May Reduce Rates Again as Global Slump Hurts Exports, ManufacturingCan anyone doubt rates will go to 0 worldwide? Can anyone doubt that if the the interest rate is 0 and the currency is printed in massive amounts that it will be worthless paper? A terrible storm is brewing. A global catastrophe of unimaginable scope as all money is debased.

AfAOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:46 pm

The banking industry is officially nationalized. Decisions to lend or not to a certain client is now being made from the Washington. Bush has just added the title of “credit analysis and credit line approval” to the function of a president. Maybe he will have more luck than Wall Street in the risk assessment, underwriting and due diligence.

“What we’re trying to do is get banks to do what they are supposed to do, which is support the system that we have in America. And banks exist to lend money,” White House press secretary Dana Perino said. While there are limits to Washington’s power to affect banks’ behavior, the White House decided it was time to use its bully pulpit.”Taxpayers will make billions when this plan succeeds. It’s a ‘win-win can’t fail’ situation. The more money banks lend the more money banks will make. It never fails. And the beauty of the plan is taxpayers benefit. If it looks like the plan is not working it’s only because banks are not lending enough.”

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:51 pm

@ DocBergYou are confusing ownership with inalienabilitiy. If someone holds title to real property in fee simple, that doesn’t mean the property is not really owned or that it is simply “rented” from the government. If you have a debt that you have not paid, such as a tax assessment or or an unsatisfied outstanding money judgment from a lawsuit, your title to the property can be encumbered and in some cases seized to satisfy the debt. Allodial title would preclude your property from ever being taken by operation of law or having a lien, mortgage, or other encumbrance recorded against it. Nothing in the Constitution says you have a right to inalienability of property.As far as I know, allodial title is not recognized in the law of any state in the United States, and for a damn good reason: we aren’t a feudal society in which title to property is vested in an elite class that is above the law. No bank would ever loan you money against property to which you held allodial title, since it could not record an enforceable mortgage against your title to secure payment of a note. While the concept of allodial title does exist in some civil law countries (e.g., France), it’s really a dumb idea because it helps perpetuate the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few, and it is inconsistent with free market principles.SWK

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:54 pm

Yes, it’s really a misnomer to refer to it as “News.” It’s really more like a mix of infotainment and right-wing propaganda.SWK

MarkOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:55 pm

What a brilliant strategy! The US is forcing every currency to be worthless, in which case US debts disappear!

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 6:58 pm

KJ:Actually, I believe Dr. Roubini said in a number of previous posts this year that the recession had already begun at the end of the fourth quarter of last year or the beginning of the first quarter of this year. I don’t think any of this is fixed in stone, however, as there remain so many unknown variables that could tilt the economy towards recovery or collapse. At the earliest, I think Dr. Roubini feels we could bottom out at the end of the second quarter of next year, but it’s clear that on the back end, the L-shaped recession/depression scenario is not out of the picture just yet.SWK

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:04 pm

I believe I posted a link to an MP3 file of this interview in one of the previous two or three threads. It definitely caught my attention!SWK

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:07 pm

We’re getting really close to the zero bound and a liquidity trap, that’s for sure. Deflation is right around the corner.SWK

AfAOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:32 pm

Common sense? To my pain, after many times swearing I will never again read a piece of his, I did read it. His illustration of different levels of asset classes using the example of a Uranium atom witnesses of a great deal of uncommon nonsense. The deleveraging procedure that he explained has nothing remotely equivalent to the structure of an atom. The example is just too confusing and fall of misconceptions. Where can I start? I will just leave it to physics geeks (follow the energy outward from the nucleus???).The only thing I can say is that if he assumes the FFR to be the nucleus of the atom (I guess he specifically means proton), then whenever it goes to 0 (become neutron), then the whole atom is broken down (or up?).In my opinion all that he described (“leverageable assets held together by a central bank policy rate at its nucleus with institutional participants playing by the rules of conservative self interest and moderate government regulation.”) can at best be described as one electron. Where did go all the “real assets” that does not have anything to do with the FFR and which does not need to be leveraged to be profitable and productive? Where is all the labor and production? Ain’t that what has to have the status of a nucleus?And finally, as you pointed out, as he says:

There will come a time, however, perhaps over the next few weeks or months, when deleveraging of the private sector is met by the leveraging up of the government sectors: the TARP, CPFF, and MMIFF will inject over a trillion dollars of liquidity into the system over a short period of time. At that point, our nuclear atom will begin to stabilize and it should be safer to move a little distance back out toward the perimeter where yields and potential returns are very attractive.

If we follow his logic, there won’t be much left in the perimeter of much value that is not brought down into the center of the nucleus (officially or unofficially nationalized). Or maybe he is referring to some physics rules along the lines: Light+Light=Darkness or Sound+Sound=Silence (two exactly similar waves traveling in opposite directions and meeting with “sync” cancel out)?That should gave him Deleverage(private)+Leverage(public)=No effectWhich is false for 2 reasons:First, Deleverage+Leverage=Nationalization and astronomical deficitsSecond, that concept is almost purely theoretical and not reproducible in laboratory, let alone in real life.

Alice in AZOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:39 pm

Regrettably, Bush can not be prosecuted. Be better informed; read the Patriot Act.Personally, I believe that the only way confidence can be rebuilt with the public is to investigate, try, convict, imprison then claw back ill gotten gains by the chief financial leaders who imprudently put their stockholder’s welfare behind their own. (And if not claw back then TAX). Perhaps this is the intent of IRS investigations. I hope so. I am in disbelief to see so little public outcry; why we have become so complacent if not because of our lax education system. These criminal captains of industry could be prosecuted under the Patriot Act (as terrorists) or under RICO (as racketeers). I want to spit at Governor Spitzer for his stupid indiscretions because time is needed for a champion and he failed the country in our time of need. Who else is there?Finally, Professor Robini is kind and my kind of patriot (boy, I don’t use that word lightly) to allow many of us (myself included) to visit his site during this turbulent time without a subscription to gain some understanding, as guests. As an interested Stern alumna who can no longer afford the regular subscription cost, I am grateful to view and follow his thinking and the mass of information here closely. Professor R truly thinks outside the box and the RGE Monitor provides the critical thinking that is missing from every other source. I am saddened by the bad boy conduct in many strains of this blog because this poor, disrespectful behavior by other “guests” not only detracts from any argument but it puts at risk all of our complimentary status. Read back and see if this site were yours, if you wouldn’t just shut down the free trial status to we guests. I find Peter CA’s postings informative and helpful. That’s a standard I want to follow.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

Your exactly right. When all fiat currencies are recognized as worthless, the US government can confiscate the gold of the IMF and the gold of the ETF GLD and we will own 1/3 of the worlds gold. Then, we can return to a gold standard currency. BRILLIANT!!!

jugglingcdosOctober 29th, 2008 at 7:58 pm

Quite a smart move,TROTW (particularly China) keeps their currency low and produces cheap goods while acquiring vast amount of USD reserve, burdening US with unpaid debt,normally this would bankrupt a country and render its economy/military useless (china at the same time building their infrastructure and procuring vital energy resources)so how US strikes back, im gonna devalue my dollars sucka’sso your dollar reserves is nothing but toilet paper..TROTW have no choice but to keep playin the gamethis cycle wont last long..

JugglingcdosOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:02 pm

yup, and some people thinks Fed is cutting rates to stimulate borrowing or the economy…. im sure Fed Reserves know banks wont lend..this isnt about real estate or price of commoditie or etc etcthis is about survival of US

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

I doubt they will go to 0 worldwide. More like just “US wide”. Iceland for one just upped their rates to 15-something-%. I just moved out of Switzerland (after being there for 5 months for work reasons) and there is no outside signs of crisis there (people losing their homes or a glut of unsold homes on the market). France and Germany seem to be doing better than UK so I would be surprised if ECB would cut rates particularly low.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:12 pm

Also there was a huge need during or after the great depression for human capital today there isn’t and to boot the population has grown.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:13 pm

I do not think this is the real John Ryskamp. He would have written in all caps. This guy is an impostor.

Octavio RichettaOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:42 pm

IMO, the narrowing of spreads for government guaranteed mortgage backed securities is gonna take much longer than Mr. Gross thinks. The government guarantee is a necessary but not sufficient condition condition for the expeditious narrowing of spreads. This is because investors won’t close the gap until the housing market improves. Mortgage lending will be a declining business as long as house prices keep coming down.I would hope someone from PIMCO makes Mr. Gross aware of a view from a guy who also considers himself as having high CQ.

Dennett's supporterOctober 29th, 2008 at 8:52 pm

So you’re saying Vincent Bugliosi is wrong about the law? (btw, I, too, am grateful to Nouriel Roubini and would kick out Ryskamp for irrationally calling our gracious host a fascist.)

Anthony D'AmatoOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:03 pm

SWK addresses fundamentals, but unfortunately he makes basic mistakes:1) The government doesn’t own your money, your income, or your property. See the Fifth Amendment’s “takings” clause.2) The power to tax under the 16th Amendment is not plenary as you suggest. Excessive taxation and punitive taxation can be unconstitutional.3) The “general welfare” clause is in the Preamble to the Constitution, which the courts have held does not count. Congress does not have the power to tax and spend for the general welfare.4) You are using “redistributive” in a vacuous sense. Under your definition, every spending bill is redistributive. This tells us nothing. Redistribution occurs when there are transfer payments. But transfer payments are unconstitutional; as Judge Iredell famously said in Calder v. Bull, the government cannot take A’s property and give it to B.Anthony D’Amato

Inquiring mindOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:12 pm

Because I’m afraid USAmericans won’t unlearn what isn’t true until TV isn’t available. There were some terrific posts related at the end of yesterday’s thread, but I think few people here saw the links.

wawawaOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:18 pm

With all respect Dr. Roubini. I am a big fan of yours.BUT when you say stuff like this, it makes me speechless.Of all the people you should know better that “ In life we do not have such a thing called as ‘solution’, we only have compromises”.This $400B should come from somewhere and produced by someone. Who will create this money ( I mean legitimately not by printing).

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:25 pm

Gross has revealed himself to be an opportunist as his company has benefited from both sides of the rescue plans. The price, much like the price Buffett has had to pay, is to shill for Paulson & Co.On Monday Gross assured viewers that Libor would move quickly to 2.8 e.g. by the next day. In that same interview GE was paraded out as a volunteer participant in the CPFF (run by Pimco), ostensibly setting an example to encourage weaker companies to come to the Pimco’s CPFF trough.Today Libor was near its Monday level of 3.5 and GE announced that revenue will be down 15% next year.I enjoy his commentaries, not so much for the quality of the content but his ability to select an unrelated topic and tie it to his message. After his call in 2002 for Dow 5000, I learned that he was clothed no differently than the emperor or Buffett’s swimmer at low tide.

NoLongerConfusedinCOOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:29 pm

PeteCA,Thanks for the explanation. That’s amazing – but I can’t say I feel sorry for the folks who got caught with their pants down.Call me old fashioned, but investing in a stock that you are hoping will go down seems a bit perverse… guess I missed the memo on that one.Again, thanks for taking the time to explain that. I appreciate your posts – substantive, but readable…

goldorcashOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:37 pm

With the recent strength of the USD I wonder if foreign countries with excess USDmight be tempted to diversify into other currencies. As hedge funds de-leveragewith the proceeds remitting to USD this might be the perfect cover for unloadingUSD without causing an immediate run. Does anyone have an understanding ofthe magnitudes here? How does the number of USD at foreign central banks comparewith the value of assets being de-leveraged?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:39 pm

furthermore remember the Asian Crisis 1997??i guess Asian countries was growing too rapidly and needs to be “slown down”,remember the promotion of “Creative Destruction”?? with the pretension of cleaning corruption in developing countriesand how Asian hits back?as a result of the crisis, these nations kept their currency lowand promoted export.. thus producing cheap labor/goods sent to yeah USdont let this modern comfort living fooled ya’allpretty nasty thing was occuring behind the curtains

RalphOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:50 pm

Can I plse put my hand up and state – for the record – that I would feel quite financially stimulated if they gave me half a million dollars.

BrGuyOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:56 pm

How it was possible ? What the consequences and why…i just wanna understand.—What a brilliant strategy! The US is forcing every currency to be worthless, in which case US debts disappear!—Your exactly right. When all fiat currencies are recognized as worthless, the US government can confiscate the gold of the IMF and the gold of the ETF GLD and we will own 1/3 of the worlds gold. Then, we can return to a gold standard currency. BRILLIANT!!!

economicminorOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:56 pm

Deflation is a monster that can spiral totally out of anyone’s control. 20 million unemployed could be a very conservative estimate IF deflation got going. It isn’t just that some debts could collapse, it is that most all debts could collapse taking the US standard of living flushing down a toilet into the sewer.We have just seen a glimpse of what can happen with housing. It can get real ugly and go on for years. No one really wants that. BUT then we didn’t want what we got either.

economicminorOctober 29th, 2008 at 9:56 pm

Deflation is a monster that can spiral totally out of anyone’s control. 20 million unemployed could be a very conservative estimate IF deflation got going. It isn’t just that some debts could collapse, it is that most all debts could collapse taking the US standard of living flushing down a toilet into the sewer.We have just seen a glimpse of what can happen with housing. It can get real ugly and go on for years. No one really wants that. BUT then we didn’t want what we got either.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:16 pm

Only problem is that he is bailing out the greedy Wall Streeters and other countries, not with his money but with people’s money. He is keep raiding poor Aemericans to make poorer.

DocBergOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:25 pm

@SWK, Yes, it is related to inalienability. All a governmental entity, or a developer working on a redevelopment project for one need do since the Kelo decision, is to show that taking your property is a public benefit, and it is taken from you, with the compensation specified by another governmental entity. As you have stated, all income is subject to seizure in the form of the income tax, and your property can be seized for the public benefit by a government or allied interest. It surely seems as though a right to private property is as ephemeral as the free market. Even Roman emperors had to respect allodial property rights. That might be feudal, but it seems to respect private property much better than does our current mode of governance.

RalphOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

I blame the lunch. I think this calls for a more responsible attitude for these turbulent times – eating at your desk!

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

Anthony:I believe the “basic mistakes” are yours.1) Under the Fifth Amendment, the government cannot take your property without due process of law and without paying you for it. That’s what the takings clause means. There are countries in the world that can just nationalize your property without compensation. The U.S. is not one of them. That doesn’t mean there is no private ownership of property, but that the private right of ownership is not absolute, and is trumped by public necessity. As for money, your income is taxable, but unlike some countries, such as the U.K., you are not taxed on your assets. You own your money, but the money attributable to you as income is not all yours. What you own is your income net of taxes, and the government can’t take that from you.2. When John F. Kennedy took office, the highest marginal tax rate in this country was something like 95%. Our taxes today are far lower than they have been since 1929 and, I think we have allowed them to become too low for the wealthiest in this country. If you can provide me a citation to a legal case in which a court has declared that income taxes imposed pursuant to the 16th Amendment are excessive or punitive, I’d love to read it. What standard do you think would be applied by a court to find to be excessive or punitive income tax rates established by our duly elected representatives in Congress? You can’t just say, “I think income taxes are just excessive and punitive.” You have to be able to show why they are so. For example, if the government taxed nearly 100% of income of the poorest 20%, such that they did not have any money left to buy food to survive, that argument might work. On the other hand, taxing 95% of Bill Gates’ income over $100 million might not meet that test.3. Just because the term ‘general welfare’ is mentioned in the Preamble to the Constitution does not mean that Congress has no authority to tax and spend for the general welfare. In fact, Article I, Section 8, Clause I of the Constitution — the Taxing and Spending Clause — expressly authorizes the Congress to tax and spend for the general welfare: “The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States…” You should always read a document in its entirety before you begin trying to interpret it.4. I do not believe I am using the term ‘redistributive’ in a vacuous sense, although I am certainly using it in a broader sense than you. Whenever a government taxes, it takes money from individuals and redistributes or reallocates it for public purposes. Your reference to Calder v. Bull in inapposite. First, the holding in that case was not about whether government transfer payments are prohibited by the Constitution, but rather, whether a state legislature could pass a law ordering a new trial in a will contest, or whether such a law violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws (the court held it did not because it involved a civil, not a criminal, matter). Second, the case was determined in 1798, long before the Constitution was amended to authorize the imposition of a tax on income (the imposition of which can result in redistribution of income through the rate schedules established by Congress). Third, notwithstanding any remarks of Judge Iredell to the contrary, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that the law of eminent domain allows the government to transfer land from one party to another for a public purpose, such as to further economic development. See Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).SWK

leo70October 29th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Small problem… you don’t need to retire to collect SS, you only needto have enough credits. People will keep working AND collect SS. Severalof my colleagues are already doing this.

kilgoresOctober 29th, 2008 at 10:56 pm

@ DocBerg:If the authors of the Constitution had thought the concept of allodial title to be essential to the principles of property ownership and individual liberty, they would surely have been in a position to incorporate that concept into the document. They did not, and probably because, as I have suggested, it would concentrate wealth in the hands of an elite few and thereby threaten liberty, and it would place mundane private property rights over the welfare of the public at large and beyond the power of the government to control. Instead, the drafters of the Constitution ensured that it provided for the express right of the government to tax and spend to promote the general welfare, and to take private property for public purposes on condition that compensation be paid to the persons from whom property is so taken.What you are then suggesting, I’m afraid, is utterly contrary to the essential constitutional principles that have guided this country for well over 230 years. For my part, I’ll stick by the Constitution.SWK

Dr SOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:07 pm

Dr. Roubini, congratulations on attaining your celebrity. I believe your ego has become inversely proportional to the markets! Don’t take yourself so seriously; remember, it’s only thinking, not reality.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:09 pm

Broken Securities Industry Still Has $20 Billion to Pay Bonuseshttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aVann0.cv9Tw&refer=exclusive#this is out-rage. those ceo of money losing company should be fired. instead, we are talking about rewarding them with bonus from USA taxpayer. we need to hold Washington politician who supported $700 Billion bailout accountable.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:12 pm

strength of USA is illusion. foreigner will definitely diversify them into some other asset classes. into what, that is the question.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:16 pm

“im gonna devalue my dollars sucka’sso your dollar reserves is nothing but toilet paper”no, you are the sucker. by doing that, you start currency crisis that will push USA economy into depression that will last for decades.

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:20 pm

unless you promotes a new currency or like what guess said,the US government can confiscate the gold of the IMF and the gold of the ETF GLD and we will own 1/3 of the worlds gold. Then, we can return to a gold standard currency. BRILLIANT!!!aahhh dont tell me youre bullish on USD, whats that?? all cash??

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:22 pm

Who are the bailout king and queen? They can bailout 1) Wall Street, 2)Fannie and Freddie, 3)Insurance companies, 4)Investment banks, 5)Banks, 6)Credit unions, 7)Other countries such as Brazil, South Korea, Singapore, 8)Monolines. Sooner or later they will bailout 1)Rating agencies, 2)States, 3)Counties, 4)Casinos, 5)Entertainment industries, 6)Rich people and more. Eventually they also will try to bailout everything, including rocks, oceans, mountains. But they will never bailout taxpayers, poor people, middle class and working people, instead they will squeeze out and rob these helpless people to bailout to support the above gamblers. Do you know are the bailout king and queen?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:35 pm

US did it before, they can do that again,anyway who in the world right now would oppose the move??as guess above us typed:”foreigner will definitely diversify them into some other asset classes. into what, that is the question.”yup into what?? anyway who have the balls to do it??Asia?? c’mon, Russia?? their economy is on thin ice.. (but they are sitting on a lot of oil/gas)anyone?

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:46 pm

possesing among the world’s most advanced military technology backed by fleets of supercarriers, AAA rating for air superiority,if all the above is not strenght, i dont know what is(yah yah a lot of casualities, Iraq/Afghan, but they did achieved their primary objectives)

Mother of GodOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:54 pm

I give up. Game over. Insane Humanity is lost. The globe will blow up.It was a very nice planet while it lasted.Don’t forget I told you this species would rid itself of the idea to allow unlimited personal fortunes or it would succumb to the results of having the next and the next and the next wealthpower giants ad infinitum.Love lost out to Evil and the Rich ate the Poor

GuestOctober 29th, 2008 at 11:54 pm

Is the Bottom in?Bill Bonner – Wed 29 Oct, 2008By the time the final bottom comes, investors are so broke, so depressed, so fed up that they no longer care.Paris, FranceHope springs eternal… and then gets whacked.Big jump in the Dow yesterday – up 889 points. Does this mark the end of the downturn… the bottom of the bear market… the worst it’s gonna get?Everyone hopes so. But don’t count on it. There is almost always a large rally before the final bottom is in. Hope… followed by disappointment. Often several times. Over a long period of time. And by the time the final bottom comes, investors are so broke, so depressed, so fed up that they no longer care.The Japanese market hit a high over 30,000 on the Nikkei Dow in January of 1990. Stocks plunged. Investors have been waiting for a recovery ever since. This year, for example, Japanese stocks have lost 50% of their value… bringing the index down to the 8,000 range, the lowest it’s been since 1982!Compared to long-term investors in General Motors, the Japanese are lucky. GM is now trading in the $5 range – a price it last saw when your editor was born 60 years ago. But even that could get worse.“End of the road for US automakers?” asks a headline in the Los Angeles Times.Meanwhile, Detroit seems to be becoming a ghost town… or a hell-hole like Port-au-Prince, Haiti – with ice. Mansions once owned by auto industry tycoons now selling for $100,000 or less. But just wait until the auto industry shuts down completely!Where and when will the bear market in the US end? No one knows. But it could end on some sad day 20 years in the future. Between now and then however, typically, a major bear market gives you a second chance to get out. After the October crash in ’29, stocks rallied until April… then they started to slide again and did not fully recover until the 1950s – more than 20 years later.At today’s levels, US stocks are not terribly overpriced. If you look at the stock market over the last 100 years, you find stocks usually trading in a range similar to where most are now. They are, say the analysts, at “fair value” with the Dow anywhere between 6,000 and 9,000. But earnings are falling. And stock prices lead earnings. In fact, they are thought to “look ahead” and track future earnings. If the First World Depression – of FWD, for the history books – unfurls as we expect, stocks could be “fair value” at much lower prices.The other thing that is likely to happen is that stock values could become “unfair.” It was unfair to charge investors $90 a share for Micron… or $120 a share for Yahoo… or $70 a share for KB Homes. Soon, it may be similarly “unfair” to pay investors only $5 for their shares in KB Homes, or Yahoo… or only 50 cents for a share in General Motors.Typically, everybody overdoes it. Coming and going. On the upside, they get carried away and pay too much. On the downside, they panic… then lose interest…a nd won’t pay enough. The “overshoot” usually goes to about half again as much – at least on the downside. That is, stocks fall to what might be considered “fair value” by most measures… and then they fall another 50%. So, if “fair value” is 8,000 on the Dow, you should expect the Dow to hit 4,000 before the bottom is in.But here at the Daily Reckoning, we always walk on the sunny side of the street. Our optimistic guess is that that the Dow will fall to 5,000. Perhaps sooner, rather than later.Mr. Market is a strange fellow, isn’t he? When he is pushing up prices, everyone loves him. When he is knocking them down, the mob gets a rope and comes after him. Even the short sellers turn against him, because he inevitably disappoints them too – causing stocks to rally strongly even in the midst of a major bear market.Believe it or not, now the capitalists are arguing that they should be allowed to ignore Mr. Market altogether. They want to use “fair value” accounting on their financial statements. They don’t like Mr. Market’s offer. So, they hope investors will accept their idea of what their stocks and assets “should” be worth… rather than what they are really worth. “Mark to market” asset valuations are “unfair,” they say.We don’t recall them complaining when “mark to market” put their asset prices far higher than they were really worth. Besides, whoever said Mr. Market played fair?And more thoughts…*** “Downturn Clobbers Public Pension Funds,” says the Washington Post. For example, the California pension system, Calpers, has lost $67 billion over the last 12 months. Government-owned pension systems tend to put about 60% of their funds in the stock market – so they’ve taken big hits, along with everyone else. And most public pension systems were underfinanced even before the stock market turned down.Retirement financing is going to be a big issue for many, many people – even those who thought they had it in the bag.Altogether, trillions of dollars’ worth of retirement funds have been lost already. Trillions more are still at risk. After such a long period of growth and credit expansion, baby boomers came to believe that their stocks and their houses were as a good as “money in the bank.” And as recently as 2007, even counting the value of their stock portfolios and their houses, experts found that a high percentage of baby boomers were woefully ill-prepared for retirement. And now their stocks are worth, most likely, about 40% less than they were in 2007… and their houses about 20% less.Making the situation worse – possibly much worse – is increasing unemployment. Whirlpool just announced 5,000 job cuts. We typed “job cuts, October 2008” into Google. We got 3,350,000 hits.The International Herald Tribune tells us that wealthy Americans are cutting back on eating out…and household help. Our two daughters – both of whom work as waitresses, while going to school or trying to become movie stars – report that getting a job in a bar or restaurant is not as easy as it used to be.“You used to be able to walk into almost any pub in London and get a job,” said one. “They were happy to take anyone who could speak English. But now, you put your name on a list… and they never call you.”If there was one thing the baby boomers were sure of, it was that if they didn’t get their retirement financing together in time, they could always just keep working for a few more years. But already, the percentage of ‘seniors’ in the workforce – 16.4% – is higher than ever. And what if the jobs disappear?*** France’s Sarkozy is feeling pretty smug. In fact, the French are feeling pretty smug… almost a feeling of schadenfreud, if they had a word for it. They knew the war in Iraq was a waste of time and money, so they stayed out of it; they were right about that. And they knew, too, that American-style hyper-capitalism wouldn’t work. They think they were right about that too.We like almost everyone we meet… once we get to know him. We have lived among the French for more than 10 years. We have learned their language and gotten to know their curious customs.For example, while Americans pretend to work hard, the French pretend not to work. For example, the parking lots in our offices in the US are nearly empty at 5:30pm. Here in Paris, when we left the office at 7pm last night, most of the staff were still at their desks.French teenagers brag to each other about how little schoolwork they do… then, they sneak off to study until the wee hours of morning.Likewise, while Americans pretend to have a lot of money, the French pretend not to. There are few flashy cars on the streets of Paris. And when you see a top-of-the-line Mercedes, it is usually owned by a foreigner. Nobody ever made any money building McMansions for the French either. Instead, houses tend to go up slowly… are solidly constructed… and much less gaudy than their US equivalents.The French also pretend not to care about money, but they are the biggest savers in Europe. France’s public debt – at 66% of GDP – is lower than the US’s – at 72% of GDP (and soon to be at 100%). As to private debt, the French are way ahead… they have private debt of 140% of GDP… about where the US was at before it went on its Fed-fueled spending spree 2002-2007. Now, private debt in the US is 280% of GDP, twice the frogs’ level.

AfAOctober 30th, 2008 at 12:33 am

well then, TV can still survive, but they will have to change their business model. That would mean you will have to pay for it either directly through subscription or indirectly through taxes. In the latter case, you will have to endure 90% of news broadcasting about the activities of the Monarch.Enjoy!

RalphOctober 30th, 2008 at 12:57 am

It’s easy to say that stocks are now fair value, or even under valued.But the two points:1. Risk is very hard to measure right nowThe business environment is far from certain. To predict what happens economically in the next 12 months is very hard – so who can say for certain their risk assumptions are correct?2. Returns expressed as earnings ratios are hard to predictExtrapolation of the last few years of earnings ratios seems like an assumption of the blind. If the recession is bad ratios have to drop. If they loose control of the financial markets, then past ratios could be almost meaningless in practical terms. If there is a recovery, then stocks might be fair value.In the absence of accurate risk and reward assumptions – who is in any position to accurately make any judgement on the value of stocks?

Wolf in the WildsOctober 30th, 2008 at 1:23 am

This is the mother of all short squeezes. Fundamentally, there is no reason for VW to be here. However, a lot of risk arb funds put a position in VW Pref Shares (long) vs the Ordinaries (short) on a Porsche event. And a lot of the ordinary shares were borrowed from Lehman. So when LEH went under, a lot of these guys need to buy back the stock. That was the first spike. At that point, for fundamental reasons, new funds shorted the stock. With the announcement that Porsche owns or controls 74% of VW, these shorts had to cover as the free float was too small too small to support such a large short base. That pushed the share price to stratospheric levels. It is a series of incredible coincidences that resulted in this massive short squeeze.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/October 30th, 2008 at 2:53 am

We already have both in Italy, the Monarch and the State/Monarch run TV.It’s just awesome! No need to worry about the credit crisis. Just watch how our fearless leader smashed his puny enemies today!

RayTOctober 30th, 2008 at 2:54 am

Well I am in cash waiting for the deflation scenario to play out. Today though, I don’t feel too good about it as the USD has dropped the most in a single day in 23 years. How can the world financial system function when you have the so called reserve currency wildly fluctuation like this? How can business be done when the very thing currency with which trade takes place moves like this?Everything seems like a gong-show. I felt that the rate cut was already baked into the markets – just plain surreal.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/October 30th, 2008 at 2:57 am

roflmao = Rolling On The Floor Loughing My A** Out.It was a joke!

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 3:32 am

Hi SWK,as to this that you are saying:

What you own is your income net of taxes, and the government can’t take that from you.

How does this work in those cases where the government “garnishes” ones income to pay for old school loan debt? Does such garnishing happen and if so, is it therefore unconstitutional?

Wolf in the WildsOctober 30th, 2008 at 3:42 am

Let me think about it.. How can this be good news? Merging 2 hopelessly loss making car manufacturers into one BIG monster of a hopelessly loss making car manufacturer is worst thing to do. So, now the government has to support a “too-big-to-fail” car maker.The irony.

tutterfrutOctober 30th, 2008 at 4:42 am

German 10 year bond yields 3.83%Italian 10 year bond yields 5.08%I’ve never seen the spread that wide, 125 bp is quite alot.Does someone knows a link where you can follow all euro area bonds? Bloomberg only seems to indicate Germany, France and Italy.

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 4:46 am

investors in Britain and France are bemused..congratulations Bernanke,Paulsonyou have rob the market confidence and logic..where do we go from here??

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 6:05 am

nice article.As to this statement…

GM is now trading in the $5 range – a price it last saw when your editor was born 60 years ago. But even that could get worse.

…if the meaning is that the GM stock was literally $5 / piece 60 years ago, the issue is that $5 was a lot more money than nowadays…so currently it is valued even at less than back then.As to

Likewise, while Americans pretend to have a lot of money, the French pretend not to.
From personal experience in living in Europe I would say that this is a small part of the current problem…coupled with the fact that in the U.S.:A. many people could not have afforded much of anything if credit was not available. Partially this is because the unstable job market (“hired at will” contracts, etc) makes saving more difficult.B. lowering wages in US and outsourcing of labor worked against the needs of the businesses to expand their U.S. market share. The solution still attempted by the US government to the problem that Americans do not have enough spending money is to lower the interest rates.Anyway there are of course many more factors to the mess than just the above two…

son of the paulOctober 30th, 2008 at 6:08 am

Father,No recession, no inflation, no deflation.We just have bullish stock markets, strong US currency, increasing housing demand.

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 6:20 am

General Electric’s stock fell 4 percent in the last minutes of trading, only to end down 1.5 percent at $19.20.Dow Jones reported that General Electric’s Chief Executive Jeffrey Immelt said GE aims at keeping 2009 profits at the same level as this year, even if revenue drops 10 percent to 15 percent.But after the closing bell, Dow Jones corrected their story, saying that GE Chief Executive Jeff Immelt had not forecast 2009 profit to be flat.The news service said Immelt had been speaking hypothetically when he told a business group in Spain that he would ask his managers to maintain profits even if revenues at their businesses fell as much as 10 percent to 15 percent.Reuters on GE outlook

kilgoresOctober 30th, 2008 at 6:24 am

Student loans are a real racket for a lot of reasons that i won’t get into right now. That being said, however, yes, the government can and does garnish monies of student loan debtors held by third parties (e.g., the IRS or your commercial bank) if a student loan is in default. This is not really much different than what any private creditor could do if it loaned money to a debtor and the money was not repaid. It’s just an enforcement mechanism to ensure repayment of a debt. Without garnishment and similar remedies, no creditor would ever loan money to anyone because if the loan were not repaid, the creditor would just be out of luck and the debtor would receive a windfall.Again, because student loans involve debts (the student has received money from a lender and is obligated to repay it) this is somewhat different than a taxation situation, in which the government levies on income, say, to spend for the general welfare. Nobody is compelled to take out a student loan, but they are compelled to pay taxes.SWK

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 6:40 am

From NakedCapitalismDeflation risk October 29, 2008 by James Hamilton – Professor of Economics at the University of California, San Diego”There are plenty of things to worry about in the current economic situation. But deflation isn’t one of them…”

Jason BOctober 30th, 2008 at 6:45 am

Dollar strength can’t last much longer, as dollar denominated deleveraging wraps up.I think what we will see is devaluation of non-essential consumer products, autos and housing. All this cheap debt moved consumption from the future to the present. The mis-allocation of resouces to housing and auto and consumer goods production will have to be worked through. Corporate earnings will fall, stock market valuations will fallEssential exchange-traded commodities (grain, oil, water(?)) will increase in value in dollar terms, which is inflationary.Unemployment will increase, as will tax levies local and national. Locally it will make up for lost revenue due to the downturn and pay for more expensive operations baded on the higer cost of commodities, and federally to pay for the incurred debt of the stimulus. Investments and pensions will be reduced in value by lower stock market valuations.This will create a negative feedback, as unemployed and impoverished pensioners move in with more fortunate friends and family. This will increase the number of houses on the market, depressing their value further. Also, as unemployment increases, lower spending and decreased demand for non-essentials will further reduce corporate profits, increasing the number of layoffs.I would think this negative feedback dynamic will become entrenched summer 2009, and continue for a decade.

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 7:39 am

A most profound comment. Why do economists get to ignore the parts of the equation they choose to ignore?

jomosOctober 30th, 2008 at 7:41 am

“Can get a auto executives mansion for $100,000″,this might mean Michigan is a good buy.Besides they sit on one of the worlds most important asset,fresh water.Maybe Michigan hit the bottom first but that might mean they recover faster.Hold tight wolverines (sp).

RayTOctober 30th, 2008 at 7:57 am

Present: Deflation (for another 6 months pending how severe)Eventually: ReflationThe rest is all about timing. Right now the Fed is fighting with full force to combat the deflationary pressures. I am certain eventually it will win but I highly doubt that victory has occurred with yesterday’s rate cut. If this is truly a hard landing we are headed for then deflationary pressure is here to stay for a while yet.

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 9:04 am

Data this morning show that monthly US consumer spending dropped the most in 28 years. That fact is entirely consistent with the data from a couple of days ago showing that US consumer confidence is at the lowest reading ever recorded.Well that certainly jives with the big market “recovery” going on over the last couple of days, doesn’t it? Is everyone still sure they want to buy into this yet???PeteCA

GuestOctober 30th, 2008 at 9:06 pm

I would like to thank Anthony D’Amato for his explanation of points. It was extremely helpful and I am keeping it for reference. Again, thank you.

GuestOctober 31st, 2008 at 4:33 am

“it would be better not to have 20 million people unemployed and tons of small businesses close.”Too late for that…it’s already happening!

GuestOctober 31st, 2008 at 4:40 am

“Major failure of the internet”There could never be a major failure of the internet unless it was planned by centralized/globalist authorities somewhere because, obviously, the internet is highly decentralized and runs on millions of servers all over the world which could never be completely brought down easily at all.This is why people should be suspicious of large/centralized computer and internet companies like Google, Microsoft, etc – because THEY have the power to do real damage to the internet and computing.

GuestOctober 31st, 2008 at 4:45 am

Actually, I heard a report on a financial program on NPR recently about sports teams, amusement parks, hotels, and casinos lowering prices because attendance was way down in many locales.$100 for a college football game – are you kidding me? Unless they are really good seats, most don’t cost over 30-40 dollars at most.many people are still maxing out credit cards to continue living the wasteful overconsumptive American life, but it clearly cannot last.

PseudothyrumOctober 31st, 2008 at 5:25 am

More than anything, this is not a financial/economic crisis but a crisis of the “growth above all” model which has taken hold in many countries around the world thanks to American economic propaganda over the past 30-40 years.Most people mistakenly believe that unless the economy is constantly growing and growing and growing everything will collapse. This is an utter falsity. Steady, smart, and clean living should be the goal whilst rampant, unsustainble, and environmentally damaging growth should be avoided.For the international financial/economic elites, ordinary Western citizens do not consume (i.e., “grow”) near enough – and this financial crisis is exactly that…the vast majority of Westerners already have all which they need for basic survival and even ‘the good life,’ and now they ask themselves: “Why do I need more? Why keep going in to debt and working my life away in pointless and terrible jobs for all of this stuff I really don’t need” And they do not need more than they already have in a material sense; to suggest so is ABSURD.The best business opportunites now will be in the countries in the world where most of the people still live in terrible poverty and desperately need basic amenities like housing, infrastructure, transportation, etc. — places like Africa, much of Asia, South America, and so on.People in The West do not need these all of these unnecessary material things any longer because most people already have them and are perfectly content and happy with what they have, and so they don’t need or want anything else. The West has reached a growth plateau, and unless each woman in these countries starts having AT LEAST 4-5 kids it will remain on this plateau indefinitely, and this is not a bad thing — however, many economic big-shots and governmental authorities want to flood Western countries with tens of millions of immigrants to falsely keep up this rapid growth: this is a VERY bad thing. We should be working to improve, develop, and modernize the countries of poor immigrants so that they don’t want or have to immigrate to Western countries.The tallest trees in the world (redwoods) can only grow so much before gravity starts to prevent water from being pumped up to the upper reaches – it then reaches its maximum height (its growth plateaus), and lives out the rest of its life. This is what has happened in The West – and we should not be scared or unnerved about this…we should actually be happy that we have reached such a pinnacle of achievement in the material/worldly realm and seek to grow in other ways, being happy with what we already have.In short, to continue to live by the “unlimited growth” hyperconsumerist philosophy of the malignant cancer cell will eventually lead to the slow death of our planet upon which we all depend for survival, which is bad for everyone.So sit back, relax, and take the time to revel in the soaring heights which Western civilization has achieved in terms of material things…it doesn’t get much better than this, and to tell you the truth it should not!

GuestOctober 31st, 2008 at 10:55 am

There will be no SS and no Medicare for my generation. There is already little work in my automotive dependent midwest town where age discrimination is rampant. My young adult children are already planning on taking in their parents when the time comes. We are doing everything to keep ourselves well and healthy by NOT using pharmaceuticals unless necessary, NOT using flu shots and other risky vaccines, NOT eating processed and genetically modified foods, and NOT allowing cheap and chemically processed fats in our diets. Additionally we use chinese medicine, herbs and homeopathic remedies and eat organic as much as possible. Eventually we may pool our assets in order to live together as a Christian family. Never really thought it would come to this.

PLNovember 1st, 2008 at 6:08 pm

Roubini tendría razón si los seres humanos fueran menos ambiciosos. Cuando los activos, casas, acciones, valgan 60% menos (y para eso no falta mucho), los buitrs empezarán a comprar, y la rectivación tendrá su inicio. ¿Fecha?: Mediados de 2009. Hasta ahí, mucho dolor y ruina.

Earle ShoihetNovember 1st, 2008 at 9:17 pm

The last 70 years it’s been about how much money you could make. The next 5 or 10 will be about how much money you cannot lose.The cumulative deficit in the USA will double in the next 3 to 5 years.The collapse of the U.S. $ is inevitable. Gold will soon enter the biggest bull market of all time as the world moves to real money.

AnonymousNovember 2nd, 2008 at 10:34 am

Finally, some common sense and reason. Guess what folks, you don’t need a Harvard MBA to figure this one out; just live a peaceful, productive life with family and friends instead of one where greed, power, materialism and having more than your neighbor become your top priorities! Strive to become more independent of all their wares: when they tempt you with high interest credit or outrageous prices, don’t you bite and guess what: they will bite (the dust, that is!)

international tradeMay 28th, 2011 at 11:44 am

Comfortably, the article post is during truthfulness a hottest on this subject well known subject matter. I agree with ones conclusions and often will desperately look ahead to your updaters. Saying thanks a lot will not just be sufficient, for ones wonderful ability in your producing. I will immediately grab ones own feed to stay knowledgeable from any sort of update versions. get the job done and much success with yourbusiness results!

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.