Latest Roubini Talks and Interviews on the Severe Financial Crisis and Recession
Earth Institute (at Columbia University), October 20, 2008: Can We Save the World Economy? A Conversation with Geroge Soros, Nouriel Roubini, and Jeffrey Sachs (click for video)
CNBC Market Panel on October 22, 2008 part 1(click for video)
CNBC: The Unfolding Financial Crisis on October 22, 2008 part 2(click for video)
CNBC: Wall Street Crisis on October 22, 2008 part 3 (click for video)
October 15, 2008: NYU Stern – Financial Crisis and the Government Rescue Plan: What Does the Future Hold? Comments by Professor Nouriel Roubini (click for video)
234 Responses to “Latest Roubini Talks and Interviews on the Severe Financial Crisis and Recession”
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:12 am
OK I am the first
JGU • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:28 am
I like your insight on the crisis itself much better than your solution, my dear professor. You are my number one man.
gas • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:28 am
Great 10/22 video, Dr. R. And it’s easy to pass on to friends, foes. Thanks.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:28 am
A message to StocksGoinGreen – any chance you will return to this board? please… Your untimely departure created quite a stir yesterday.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:35 am
NR, nicely done!I’ve noticed that you have now moved your recessionary time table to 2 years vs. 12 – 18 months. I think many of us who read and post on your site feel even 2 years maybe short sighted.Could you expand on why you now feel the recession is now 2 years vs. 12 – 18 months? Then extrapolate what might have to happen for it to become a depression.I’m sure I speak for many here is saying … thank you for both your insights and ability to read them!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:35 am
I watched you on CNBC this morning, they really were quite befuddled. Interesting that you have never eaten at a McDonalds restaurant.More importantly you predicted a 24 month recession but also said that you expect it to last only until next December (2009). I assume that like many others you believe that we have already been in recession for most of 2008.
JLC • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:43 am
RE: Discussion on previous thread about physical PM prices.Check out 1 oz gold and silver eagles and gold buffalo on EBay.Silver eagles are selling for $18-$20 per ounce – is that 100% over spot??1 oz gold coins are easily $100 over spot.
StocksGoinGreen • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:48 am
http://www.zazzle.com/arnold_schwarzenegger_ill_be_back_shirt-235506104073777630
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:50 am
IMF chief faces staff affair inquiry|The AustralianTHE International Monetary Fund (IMF) has been plunged into a leadership crisis in the middle of the world financial turmoil by allegations that its managing director had an affair with a married employee.The IMF has begun an investigation into whether Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the former French Socialist finance minister, acted improperly by showing favouritism to Piroska Nagy, a Hungarian woman employed in the fund’s Africa department.Investigators are also examining the payout received by Ms Nagy when she resigned in August before taking a position with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in London… [The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development is the sister organization for the IMF and is commonly called the World Bank.]The affair is reported to have come to light when Ms Nagy’s husband, Mario Blejer, an Argentine-born economist who once worked at the Bank of England, discovered compromising emails.Strauss-Kahn, 59, who is married to Anne Sinclair, one of France’s popular television presenters, said in a statement on the weekend he was “continuing to co-operate” with the investigation into what he described as an “incident which occurred in my private life”…Once regarded as the prototype “champagne socialist”, Strauss-Kahn had combined a glamorous Parisian lifestyle with a high-flying political career…Strauss-Kahn was also at the centre of a titillating mystery involving Yasmina Reza, France’s celebrated playwright, who published an intimate portrait of Sarkozy last year.Strauss-Kahn took over at the IMF shortly after Paul Wolfowitz…was forced to resign following allegations he had shown favouritism to an employee with whom he had a long-standing relationship…The Wall Street Journal reported that Strauss-Kahn had sent emails to Ms Nagy discussing a possible relationship, which began earlier this year during a conference in Europe…http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24520039-2703,00.htmlIn 1999, Strauss-Kahn was accused of corruption in two financial scandals related to Elf and MNEF, a student mutual health insurance, and resigned as Minister for Economics, Finances, and Industry in Jospin’s Socialist Party Plural left government in France to fight the charges, in agreement with the “Balladur jurisprudence.” He was acquitted in November 2001,and reelected in a by-election in the Val-d’Oise.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn
JimmyTheBanker • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:51 am
I believe that is due to scarcity-they had to quit producing these because of demand was my understanding.
Mark • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:16 am
Wolfowitz’s ousting was a cover. He’s lucky that he only got thrown out on his butt. I doubt that Strauss-Kahn is responsible for murdering thousands of people like Wolfowitz.
StocksGoinGreen • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:27 am
ALRIGHT KIDS…YOU ARE THE BEST! I MISSED YOU TOO! WE HAVE AN OVERHEAD GAP TO FILL!! BOOM!!!!
Googler • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:35 am
Don’t we need more people in the US (more tax-payers)?How are we going to pay for eveything?
James • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:46 am
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:46 am
Thats more like it.
tutterfrut • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:51 am
If you want to have an idea of what a system collapse looks like,here you have a video of the Argentinian 2001 collapse…(with thanks to Chip in the Global economic analysis blogspot comment space)http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4353655982817317115&ei=oVH_SM_UJpH8qAPT8P3fDA&q=Argentina%27s+Economic+Collapse+(FULL+VERSION)&hl=en
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:52 am
perhaps but it depends on what government you work for when you murder folks. You can make decisions that cause the death of thousands if you work for the U.S. government, for example. There is no tribunal that will try to sue you. But make decisions like that when you work for some African country or some slavic regime and it is a different story.US and UK soft control the media, the “soft machine”.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:54 am
drastic-reduce the population.The unfortunate near future choice to solve this and the other crisis.Based on the mindset of neo-politicians of various flavors (conservatives, AdolfHitlerites, etc).
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:56 am
DENIED!!! SOMEBODY WANTS THIS LOWER TODAY!!! BEWARE OF KIDS IN THE SANDBOX
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:57 am
URGENT: World leaders will meet Nov. 15 in Washington to address what could be long, deep global crisis
Michel • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:59 am
It should be added that Strauss Kahn had many supporters in France, including me, for one reason.He’s the only french politicians with deep insight in economics. It a very pragmatic keynesian politicians. Other politicians and the current Lagarde ministry of economy only have liberalism or anti-liberalism view that reflect their lack in understanding economy.It is unfortunate for the ideas pushed in this blog that he will probably not be available as the IMF director at the time the IMF may be restructered to centeralized an enhanced finance world supervision.He may be blamed for this even if the charges against him happen to be exagereted by the media or his anti regulation opponents.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:00 pm
private now public? will they hack the atm machines like the last time?…”Argentina’s stocks headed for their biggest drop since 1990 and dollar bond yields topped 30 percent as a planned takeover of pension funds heightened concern the government is headed for its second default this decade…. take over 10 private pension funds during a speech in Buenos Aires yesterday. She said the proposal would protect retirees from the global financial crisis and denied trying to “grab the cash” to pay off debt or to finance new programs or projects. The last time Argentina sought to tap workers’ savings was in 2001, just before it halted payments on $95 billion of bonds.“Tapping into the pension funds makes it blatantly obvious that it needs funds,” said Aryam Vazquez, an emerging markets economist with Wells Fargo & Co. in New York. “This is bad news any way you look at it…The private retirement system, set up in 1994 to help bolster capital markets, owns about 5 percent of companies listed on the Buenos Aires stock exchange and 27 percent of shares available for public trading, data compiled by pension funds show.” bloomberg
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Welcome Back but too many people in uppercase how about mixing it up a bit with italics or bold or underline by the way I assume an overhead gap is a bullish indicator
JohnRyskamp • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
1. By the Way:By the way, from Market Ticker here is what I meant when I said that Nouriel has gone down the slippery slope of “systemic risk.” Everything now is a systemic risk. It is a disastrous notion he should NEVER have picked up, because it has utterly destroyed his credibility:Ben and Hank produced a dislocation in this section of the marketplace by favoring other debt instruments with federal guarantees, thereby forcing money out of these instruments.This in turn created major problems for money market funds who buy this paper as a routine matter of course in that when they needed to redeem deposits they suddenly found no buyers for the securities, as those people had fled to other instruments that Ben had guaranteed payment on!As each new facility is rolled out by Ben and Hank a new area of debt becomes backstopped by the government in some fashion, thereby forcing money out of other instruments and causing those instruments to become distressed!2. By the Way:Those of you who are intelligent enough to read my little inputs may be wondering what happened to my “liquidate liquidate liquidate?” When will the ghost of Andrew Mellon appear? Again, from Market Ticker:There is a very real risk that this Treasury Issue could force GDP return on new debt below zero. If that happens then the stability of the monetary system disappears immediately and you will see instantaneous and very large fails in the Treasury marketplace.The consequence of this event would be catastrophic. Ben would have only two choices – print raw money, which would immediately collapse the Treasury marketplace, or get Treasury and Congress to immediately reduce issue and spending to sustainable levels.What would “sustainable levels” be? Given that issue is running $3 trillion year-on-year, this could result in an immediate and forced cut in all federal spending by fifty percent or more as the TARP and other program money will have been spent and cannot be recalled.Yes, you read that right. Now go look at the Federal Budget and you will find that you could eliminate all discretionary programs and all of the military and not get there. This means that in order to attain stability we would have to immediately gut Medicare and Social Security by about 50%, cut our military budget dramatically, perhaps by 25% or more, and eliminate essentially all discretionary spending – all farm subsidies, the Department of Education, Unemployment Assistance and more.Oh, and having done that, the long end of the curve would probably still spike to 10%, which means 13-14% mortgage rates. Cut the value of every house in America in half – again – from here.NOW AGAIN, WHAT DO WE DO? WE HAVE TO PUT IN A BAN ON HOUSING EVICTIONS AND MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WE ARE NO LONGER UNDER THE WEST COAST HOTEL SCRUTINY REGIME, WE ARE UNDER THE MAINTENANCE REGIME AS I HAVE LAID IT OUT IN MY BOOK, THE EMINENT DOMAIN REVOLT.NO ONE WILL PURCHASE TREASURY DEBT UNTIL THERE IS AN INDIVIDUALLY ENFORCEABLE RIGHT TO HOUSING IN THE UNITED STATES. IN FACT, NO ONE WILL DO SO UNTIL THE NEW BILL OF RIGHTS AND THE MAINTENANCE REGIME ARE IN POWER.Unfortunately, look at Market Ticker’s idiotic responses, which will never make it through the political system because the political system is there to keep the stock market UP and people EMPLOYED. Need I add that Market Ticker knows nothing about the legal system in which all this nonsense is taking place? His is not a rights-informed solution. Mine is.Force the immediate cessation and unwind of these “special facilities”, including the so-called “money market” liquidity facilities. While its bad if money market funds break the buck and return only 98 cents, the fact remains that every one of these funds has a statement in the front of the prospectus that says “may lose value.” If The Fed refuses to stop coddling its member banks and tampering with the credit markets then Congress must force this outcome via emergency legislation. We must stop forcing money in the debt markets out of various portions of the market and into the “guaranteed” ones by removing the guarantees, or we will wind up guaranteeing all of it – an impossible task, as there is some $53 trillion of private credit in the marketplace and we don’t have the money! Bernanke is a trapped rat and his desperate actions are now threatening the sovereign debt of The United States.Force a full stop on the insane pace of Treasury Issue. We cannot allow a bond market dislocation. If one occurs we will suffer an economic depression. Not might – WILL.Repeal the EESA and force Fannie and Freddie’s portfolios to unwind, effectively repealing the portion of the Housing Bill earlier this summer that dealt with them. If this bankrupts Fannie and Freddie and results in losses for the debt holders, so be it.Enact policies (both literally and by “jawbone”) that force the bad debt in the system out – through bankruptcy if necessary, through pay down if possible. This sounds cruel and painful. It is painful but necessary; the key here is to prevent a bond market dislocation, especially in the Treasury Market.As part of #4, force housing prices down so that the median home price returns to 3x median income. This will produce a monstrous number of foreclosures but that is preferable to the alternative – an economic depression. Note that these people will not be homeless; there will be lots of empty houses to rent, and rental prices will collapse due to oversupply. In a couple of years these individuals will be able to repurchase either their home or a comparable one – with 20% down, 36% DTI and a 30 year fixed mortgage, as prices will return to levels where this will be possible. I understand this is politically difficult but it is necessary; a massive number of consumer bankruptcies sounds bad, but is in fact good, as clearing the bad debt from the system is necessary to prevent its collapse.If the bad debt defaults cause the collapse of the large money-center banks, then Congress should consider the creation of five or ten new banks with an initial capital infusion of $20 billion each, IPOing each immediately and attaching an onerous coupon (e.g. 10%) to the initial capital to strongly encourage its replacement with private capitalization. This will provide a base lending support of $2 trillion into the economy. However – until #1-5 are undertaken the economy cannot absorb this capacity and therefore it is of no value until that bad debt has been defaulted.
James • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:13 pm
A comment from this article:”I’ll tell you what happened…the investing class drove American production overseas in the quest for greater profit margins for shareholders and fatter paychecks and benefits packages for management. As the wealth migrated upward, eventually the poverty that was left in its wake, that destroyed the real source of America’s wealth, the working class, followed it upward into the middle class that had so gleefully helped in the off-shoring of American production. If you truly want a return to prosperity in the US, bring the production facilities that once generated the wealth of our nation back home. When the US economy took this incredible nosedive, did anybody notice that the only thing any of these corporations had to back their wealth was debt that they had been trading back and forth, increasing its hypothetical value every time it changed hands? Debt is the only thing we produce here now, and it is proven to be debt of very poor quality.”
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
DON’T KNOW HOW! ANYWAY-DOUBLE BOTTOM BABY!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Ok, I am a total neophyte when it comes to financial matters, so please be kind when ripping this apart.Since it seems like so much of this is related to mortgages that people can’t pay, why not do something different with the $700B? How about a national lottery comprised of home owners who only own one home? Pay off as many mortgages as possible with the $700B. The money still goes to the banks for loans that would possibly have been defaulted on, and the homeowners get a large chunk of their income freed up to be able to increase their discretionary spending, which should benefit their local economies, and by extension, the overall economy. The government buying up a bunch of toxic debt and bad home loans does nothing for the common man, struggling to pay all his bills.OK, rip away.
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Nothing scientific here, but one this kind of “scandals” works its way into the media, I perceive it as a sign of some kind of disagreement, blackmailing … emanating from a superior ‘body’.Incidents like these are very frequent and have odd coincidence, timing, and absurdity.
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Excluding the two upper-cased paragraphs, this is one of the very few posts of yours that makes sense.Sarcasm off.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:02 pm
In Sour Economy, Some Scale Back on Medicationshttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/22/business/22drug.html?_r=2&ref=business&oref=slogin&oref=sloginThat's bad news. I think Americans need their meds. (Just like the rest of this planet)
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:04 pm
For those forces of the world who are interested in establishing the international merging of banks and political systems into a single world currency and cooperative political control, they need a specific kind of political official. From each nation, these international enthusiasts need politicians who will deliver their political system to the “greater good.” For an African nation, this may mean an authorative dictator, for a socialist nation, a socialist with Marxist inclinations.IMO, Strauss-Kahn was attractive to the IMF movers for this reason, primarily to deliver France, and for his support of Keynes’ Fabian ideals of bringing socialism to the world. John Maynard Keynes co-founded the IMF/World Bank. The Fabians scorned the Communists, not because they disliked their goals, but because they disagreed with their methods.It can be noted that Strauss-Kahn prepared France’s entrance in the euro zone; he co-founded the think tank “A gauche en Europe” (To the Left in Europe) and “Socialisme et judaisme” (“Socialism and Judaism”); he presided jointly over the “Socialisme et democratie” current in the Socialist Party (PS); and he campaigned for the “Yes” at the referendum on the Project for a Treaty establishing a Constitution in Europe, refused by more than 54% of the French citizens. Further, in 1993 he was appointed chairman of the groupe des experts du PS (“Group of Experts of the Socialist Party”).Interestingly, in 1994, Raymond Levy, then director of Renault, invited Strauss-Kahn to join the Cercle de l’Industrie, a French industry lobby in Brussels, where he met the billionaire businessman Vincent Bollare and top manager Louis Schweitzer; Strauss-Kahn served as secretary-general and later as vice president. This lobbyist activity earned him criticism from his alter-globalization left support that opposes the unregulated political power of large, multi-national corporations.Is is fair to say that France’s alter-globalization activists generally call for forms of global integration, but based on better provide democratic representation, human rights, and more egalitarian states? But does it ever work this way?
Mark • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:07 pm
The sub-prime mortgage problem/issue is only part of the overall mess.The underlying problem is that the economic system can no longer grow.It’s like musical chairs, this Ponzi scheme, the music stopped and we’re now sitting down to the realization that some, many, will hit the ground hard. Worse is the realization that starting the music up again will only result in the same scenario. While these sort of things have always gone on, today we find that people are more aware, which will cause the controllers much more difficulty figuring out how to blow the next bubble (without folks spotting it early on, and killing it).The number of chairs and volume of music will go down as (physical) energy diminishes.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:12 pm
do we get the 2:30 bounce today?
AnotherGuest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:15 pm
From each nation, these international enthusiasts need politicians who will deliver their political system to the “greater good.” For an African nation, this may mean an authorative dictator, for a socialist nation, a socialist with Marxist inclinations.
In fact I have been thinking along these lines myself. Besides this issue of a necessary enthusiast in each nation (ok, there could be a few that will not have one but they can always be coerced to join the rest), there is the issue of necessary cause. So each nation (again possibly with some exceptions) will have a situation (the excuse, if you will) that requires (or so it will be explained to the masses) the joining of the nation to the greater plan.And then we have these two man-made eco-* disasters (the ecological one and the economical one) that will of course be used for something.
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:18 pm
I would have said/added that the problem is one of a subprime lending/financial system, and that residential mortgage is just a small part of it.Somehow, some people still think that stopping housing evictions is the ONLY solution. In all cases, this and Mark’s comments are as well relevant to the post above.
AfA - StocksGoinRed • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Nope
JohnRyskamp • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:26 pm
You obviously don’t get it. No one will fund American suburbia any more without an individually enforceable right to housing. When American suburbia collapses, the world collapses.If this doesn’t “make sense,” ask for clarification from American suburbia.
JimmyTheBanker • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:27 pm
Guest, IMHO, that $700B was to save the Feds own balance sheet. They can’t afford to keep rolling over this toxic debt they are taking on in exchange for Fed Treasury bonds. By buying away that junk, it uncuffs the Fed and restores the integrity of its balance sheet. Your idea is a wise one, but the would need a new $700B for it.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:32 pm
MAWould you say that Schiff is not considering dept forgiveness? http://www.merkfund.com/money/authors/schiff/2009-09-12.htmlDid you see my response to you in previous thread?hlowe
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:33 pm
this brought to mind something.Countries that defaulted in the past and were not too rebellious against the International Order (such as Argentina) were eventually provided financial guidance (or “guidance”) by the IMF. This likely included advise to set up their economy in a manner similar to the (in)famous duo, US and UK. This then likely lead to the government being heavily involved in supporting various aspects of the system (pensions, health care, etc) in a manner that depended on investments in financial instruments in other countries. I could think that the main countries whose financial instruments were typically invested in were those of the aforementioned duo. Now when this duo is sinking in a ship of their own making, they may drag with them economies that have just been following IMF advise.Thus the second collapse of Argentina?
Medic • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:35 pm
I concur. Much better John. Now, a couple of questions:1. Please define and explain your terms “west coast hotel scrutiny regime” and “maintenance regime”2. Why do you believe that no foreign investment will come to the US without housing rights? What if lending standards were simply returned to reasonable guidelines (eg: 20% or more down on all home loans)?You are getting clearer. Now just stop shouting. Just because you have a message, and perhaps an important message, you must be able to communicate it or it will never be heard and or acted upon.
John Ryskamp • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:39 pm
By the way, the currency intervention race to the bottom–which I predicted two years ago–is already pretty well advanced. You are reading about it now in connection with Hungary, but it’s been going on quite a while. The problem is that governments are trading on their own inside information, so these interventions leap out from the shadows. However, it is the end game in the collapse of the world economy.This will be where the action is as gold goes to $12 and copper to 4 cents. However, you need to know a good currency trader.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:45 pm
if all global governments are trashing their currencies by printing more money, lowering interest rates, etc…this means more and more liquidity chasing the same amount of commodities – so commodity prices to go through the roof!
crgordon • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:45 pm
StocksGoinRed.Funny. You should be in all caps for better effect.
James • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:46 pm
As I recall, John McCain came out in one of the debates with this idea. He said Hillary Clinton had proposed a similar plan. If I’m not mistaken, It was shot down because it was expensive, it wouldn’t really deal with the underlying problem and because people didn’t like the idea of bailing out real estate speculators and the banks that provided them easy, risky money. I’m not sure if McCain is still touting this idea.There is the HOPE plan, but it is very expensive for homebuyers. It gives the government 1/2 of all future appreciation in home value for all time. Plus, you have to pay 1/2 of the initial equity write down anyway (The mortgage gets written down to 90% of current value).
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm
BUYING FERRIES LININ UP! BIG SELLER IS GONE, ROCKET RIDE BEGINS IN 8 MINUTES!!!!
StocksGoinGreen • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:56 pm
StocksGoinRed-GOOD ONE, YOU MADE ME FORGET TO SIGN MY NAME AHAHAHAHAHAH!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
RUN FOREST RUN!!!! AHAHAHHAHAAH
JohnRyskamp • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Wrong. Other things leap out from the shadows to sabotage the supposed “safe havens” of commodities, gold and silver. A big one now is people having to sell their commodity investments to meet other financial commitments.That has to be washed out of the system, and that will bring prices REAL low. Then demand will collapse.You suffer under the illusion that there is some “floor” demand at which prices “must” stabilize. That being the case, there is a guaranteed market which will stimulate investment cash.But watch out. That investment cash will itself dry up. Then you start to have supply problems. As the economy collapses, will the wheat production infrastructure (both financial and otherwise), and the gold production infrastructure, hold? No.Look at Baltic Dry to see what is going on. To be sure there is some overproduction in shipping, but as shipping declines, the shipping INFRASTRUCTURE itself starts to decline.So you don’t want to invest in a commodity–even assuming you have the money–if you are not sure of being able to lay hands on the commodity itself.Then there are other factors which sabotage commodity investment. One is restrictions on currencies and commodity hoarding by governments.I don’t think you have studied sufficiently what governments do when things REALLY get bad.Reason? It never got REALLY that bad during the Depression in the United States. 50% unemployment is the tipping point. Plug that into your models and see what happens to commodity prices.In the end, it is a fantasy to think that investors go to gold or commodities as safe havens. The concept of a safe haven ITSELF degenerates.In the end, it turns out to be about what it has always been about: social conditions.No one is addressing that directly, but me. All the technotwits like Roubini put that as an EFFECT of their changes. That allows them to parade as humanists and idealists, while at the same time “concluding” that individually enforceable rights are ideals. Thus, they sell the concept of THEMSELVES as redeemers. Which only means that THEY get the power to decide, not YOU.Don’t be fooled. We are putting in at every stop down the river toward the collapse of social conditions.The problem is a lack of individually enforceable rights, and when this catastrophe ends, it will be written that it was about a world which stood in need of new individually enforceable rights–and didn’t get them in time.
JohnRyskamp • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:04 pm
By the way, for those who think I don’t know what I’m talking about, or know which way things are heading. I have said that we are moving–worldwide–to an individually enforceable right to housing, and that is exactly what is happening. What I particularly relish is that it doesn’t matter what the “moral hazard” psychos think about it–it doesn’t matter whether they approve of it or not. It will happen:U.K. Orders Judges to Ensure Home Repossessions Are Last ResortBy Mark Deen and Kitty DonaldsonOct. 22 (Bloomberg) — Prime Minister Gordon Brown ordered judges to ensure that home repossessions are only made by banks as a last resort as a looming recession threatens an increase in U.K. mortgage defaults.“I can announce today new guidance for the judiciary to halt repossessions unless alternative options have been fully examined,” Brown said today in Parliament. “We’re determined to do everything we can to avoid repossession.”The order shows how lenders, landlords and other companies are facing increasing social and political pressure in Britain after Brown rescued British banks by offering 50 billion pounds ($81 billion) to buy stakes and strengthen balance sheets.U.K. banks repossessed the most homes in 12 years during the first half of 2008 as the credit squeeze left more consumers unable to pay their record debts, data from the Council of Mortgage Lenders shows. Rightmove Plc, Britain’s most-used property Web site, said this week that the rate of repossessions is set to rise further in the months ahead.Brown predicted today that the U.K. will slip into recession, his first admission that Britain’s longest unbroken streak of economic growth in more than a century is over. Bank of England Governor Mervyn King said the same thing last night.“Banks and building societies need to realize that it is now time to act in a responsible way to stop more families being at risk of losing their homes,” said Brendan Barber, secretary general of the Trades Union Congress.Resolving DisputesJustice Minister Bridget Prentice said in a separate statement that lenders will be expected to demonstrate that they have sought to resolve defaults outside the courts. If they can’t prove that, they may be denied authority to take control of a property where the owner is behind in loan payments.“We recognize that there is significant public concern about this subject,” said Michael Coogan, director general of the Council of Mortgage Lenders. “The new guidance should help to reassure consumers that lenders are genuinely committed to seeing repossession as a last resort and that the checks and balances that protect consumers are in place.”Brown refused to say whether he would repeal a tax on empty property that landlords have faced since April given the surge in vacancies.“We’ll look at everything we can,” he said. “There are no rates to be paid for the first three months (of vacancy) and the first six months where it’s industrial property,” he said.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:05 pm
S&P 900 IS THE NO-GO LINE FOR TODAY!!!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:07 pm
agree with you if we get a depression about 10x worst than the Great Depression…maybe we do get this – do you know if the rate of central bank monetary inflation in the last 8 weeks or so is greater than the rate of market value destruction of toxic waste assets? if so, we should be ok, if not and I think this is the situation now – that this rate is not greater yet, we are therefore getting massive deflation now…
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:09 pm
does anyone know if the rate of central bank monetary inflation in the last 8 weeks or so is greater than the rate of market value destruction of toxic waste assets? this could the big question of our day – if yes, then we should get hyperinflation…if no, then we are getting deflation as now…
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:13 pm
Columnist Bob Scheer says there’s a struggle in progress to capture Barack Obama’s “economic soul.” On one front is two Clinton-era secretaries, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. And the opposing front, seen by Scheer as the good guys, is manned by former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker and investor star Warren Buffett.Scheer says Buffett, increasingly visible in the Obama campaign, has called new investment devices “hybrid instruments” and credit swaps “financial weapons of mass destruction.”Scheer says Volcker consistently criticized Greenspan’s anti-deregulatory crusade which gave the banking lobby everything it wanted.Writes Scheer: Key among the good guys is former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, who consistently challenged the radical anti-deregulatory crusade of his Fed successor Alan Greenspan. That all-too-successful effort to give the banking lobby everything it had ever dreamed of was abetted by two Clinton-era secretaries of the Treasury, Robert Rubin and Lawrence Summers. Unfortunately, the latter two, who should have mustered the grace to depart public life in deep contrition over their failed policies, are still prominent in the Obama campaign.Rubin, who pocketed tens of millions running Goldman Sachs before becoming Treasury secretary, is the man who got Clinton to back then-GOP Sen. Phil Gramm’s legislation to unleash banking greed on an unprecedented scale. What followed, thanks to a rare display of bipartisan teamwork, was a total dismantling of the regulatory regime that President Franklin D. Roosevelt put in place during the New Deal, thus undermining the finest legacy of the Democratic Party. Under the guidance of Rubin and Summers, Clinton signed off on the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, Gramm’s two key pieces of legislation, during his final two years in the White House.The first beneficiary of that legislation was Citigroup, which was allowed to merge with Travelers Insurance, where Rubin became a director after leaving the government. In his position on the executive committee of a floundering Citigroup, Rubin insisted as late as January of this year that a serious crisis was not forming. In an article, “Robert Rubin: What meltdown?” Fortune reporter Katie Bennett stated, “In a talk on Wednesday, the Citigroup director said the current financial upheaval is just cyclical. And none of the blame that there was to assign went to Wall Street.” Bennett quoted Rubin as stating that the problems were “all part of a cycle of periodic excess leading to periodic disruption,” neatly exonerating his own bank of any responsibility, even though Citigroup had already written down over $24 billion in bad mortgage losses.http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/22/ED7N13M00R.DTL&type=printable
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:14 pm
Does you book list a “New Global Bill of Rights”? If not, do you want to start one? How about that each person has the right to resist parasitical invasion of their individual liberties and freedoms by the oppression of perpetual debt creation by a fiat-based, fractional-reserve, privately-owned, central banking system. Just saying.
JimmyTheBanker • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:14 pm
John Ryskamp-for your plan to work, we would need all banks to go away and have the Government be the only lender. You just can’t circumvent value and thus streams of cash flows and funding structures against those cash flows and expect banks to make any money. You want to talk about moral hazard, your plan would also have to be expanded to include office space and leases. You can’t boot out businesses just becuase they fall on hard time now can you, hell, we may as well revert back to Russia circa 1900.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:15 pm
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:18 pm
Yeah, then we can just wipe out the stock market too-it is forcing too many Americans onto hard times. We can eliminate the exchnages and have the Government just pay us all a 5% return in perpetuity!
StocksGoinGreen • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:20 pm
YEAH, I HEAR THE ACRONYM “USSR” IS NOW AVAILABLE!!!
Capone • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:26 pm
you know oddly enough – the manipulations and interventions in the market have prevented the type of capitulation the market needs before it can move up for a few months or so. just like the painted the tape all the way up and then realized they were walking on air AGGRAVATING the situation on the way down… the same goes for this potential bottoming process… manipulation ultimately DOES not function effectively and worsens the situation.
StocksGoinGreen • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:27 pm
LLOK AT THE PPT LINE AT S&P 900!!!!!! LOLOL THEY KNOW IT IS THE KEY ROUND NUMBER AS DO I!!!!!! HEREEEESSSS JOHNNY!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:28 pm
3:26 p.m.Brazil’s Bovespa halted after equity index drops 10%
James • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:31 pm
Very interesting article. I think though, Scheer means ‘Greenspan’s anti-regulatory crusade’. Otherwise, it doesn’t make sense. Not only Greenspan, Rubin and Summers were anti-regulation, but SEC Chairman Christopher Cox’s claim to fame before he was appointed by Bush was that he was anti-regulation. And he was put in as chief regulator! People need to realize that that’s WHY he was put in charge of the SEC, and they need to realize the effect it has had.
JohnRysakmp • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:35 pm
These ridiculous comments ignore the facts. And they ignore the facts because the scrutiny regime of West Coast Hotel has taught you that you are forbidden to follow the little dog Toto to see who is behind the curtain.Banks–evaluate objectively the role of banks in keeping people in housing.Value–evaluate objectively housed individuals in maintaining value.Cash flows–evaluate objectively the role of cash flows in maintaining individuals in housing.Moral hazard–evaluate objectively the police state component of housing evictions.Office space and lease–evaluate objectively the relationship between housing and maintenance.Stock market–evaluate objectively the role of housed individuals in the continued existence of the stock market.Find out what are the FACTS with regard to these things. You have been trained like monkeys to know that under West Coast Hotel (also Lindsey v. Normet), the ONLY facts to be introduced in a housing eviction action are:1. what is the mortgage payment or rent;2. has the mortgage payment or rent been paid.This is entirely insufficient. If it is allowed to proceed unchecked, the world economy will be utterly destroyed. Then there is no more “moral hazard” because there is no economy.Stop thinking like an ape.
Ashu • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Dow down almost 700 pts.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tutterfrut • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:43 pm
KAPUTTulation
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:46 pm
It’s a slow process. It takes 8-16 months to see increases in the money supply and subsequent inflation. If hyper-inflation is in our future it is a year or so down the road unless: A)TROTW begins to trade oil in a gold-backed currency or B)TROTW dumps the dollar. But since TROTW has so much USD reserve currency, they would find it difficult to dump trillions of dollars quickly.With gold tanking at $720, oil tanking at $67/barrel ($2.01/gal), and the dollar index @ 85%, it’s looking, walking, and quacking like deflation. Deflation, of course, scares the bejesus out of Bernanke; so soon they will be cooking up another discount window or stimulus package for another $500 billion. That’s the basic tension. The system tendency is towards deflation and loss of control by the Federal Reserve. The Federal Reserve will continue to create money to stop deflation, but in doing so will they be able to stop inflation?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Actually the people I follow are expecting real capitulation around DOW 6000 in a couple of weeks.Just Saying
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
TPTB has 10 minutes to save a third of that loss
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
for the world currency, perhaps they are trying to get the euro, pound and dollar to parity first
Ashu • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
I have a question:A friend of mine had a bank account in kaupthing edge, german branch (cuz he was geting a higher rate of interest). The bank filed for bankrupcy 2-3 weeks back, now under Iceland govt. control. Now his account has been frozen for the past three weeks………….what shud he do? Since its not a german bank, germany’s gov. is not responsible. He actually has 80% of his family’s life savings in that account.Does any one has some lead or suggestion for him? Thanks!
StocksGoinGreen • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:56 pm
BUYING FERRIES ARE GONNA SAVE S&P 900!!!!!!! KA BOOOOMMM!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:58 pm
*sigh* Ah well, it was just a thought.I think I’ll stick to programming. This financial stuff is far too complicated, lol.Thanks for the replies.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:04 pm
As usual, you just provide the silly attack of others are idiots or monkeys, rather than justify why somthing is rediculous. I do know this for fact…you are the biggest douch-bag I have ever come across.
JimmyTheApeBanker • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Have him call Ryskamp, his ego can solve any problem…
tutterfrut • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:09 pm
Same situation in Belgium. Kaupthing which was registered in Luxembourg but operating in Belgium has Belgian savings that were secured for only 20.000 euros by the Luxembourg insurance system. The different governments are still trying to work things out.(read: no one really wants to pay out)The only thing your friend could do for the moment is to try to get together with people that are in the same boat and put pressure wherever they can to keep the authorities from slowly pushing this to a lower level of priority.Wish your friend good luck and strong nerves, though…
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:13 pm
BULLETIN AMAZON SHARES SLIDE 13% IN LATE TRADING AFTER FORECAST DISAPPOINTS
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm
He should contact BaFin (or “Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht” in case you enjoy reading long words).http://www.bafin.deThey even have an FAQ on the Kaupthing case.
Jason B • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:20 pm
This is the funniest thread ever. Ryskamp brings out the angry humor in everyone.I love you , Ryskamp. Welcome back, you douchbag
Spare Me Your Ego • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Mr. Ryschimp,I’m frankly surprised that anyone is taking your ideas seriously on this board, as the degree of your expressed hostility equals that of your trumpeted superiority complex. You will never win converts to your ideas by masking them within insulting rhetoric. You were absent from this board for a long while, and I daresay the board was a better place without your strutting ejaculations and uppercase rants about Obama (yawn). If you wish to avoid coming off as an unwashed monomaniac, please take the trouble to read your posts for clarity, substance, and common courtesy before hitting the “Submit” button.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Man did I just laugh reading that!!!
JimmyTheApeBanker • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:40 pm
Tomorrow looks rough too. Jobless claims are also gonna be a little rough tomorrow…4:38 p.m.Allegheny Technologies posts lower profit, trims outlookOoo-Ooo-Ahhh-Ahhh
MM CA • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:41 pm
The Price of Sanity in a Time of MadnessPeter SchiffOct 21 2008In the last few months, many of the investment portfolios recommended by Euro Pacific Capital have experienced the most adverse conditions that I have seen in ten years. At present, the troubles are continuing. Driving the declines has been weakness in foreign currencies that are important to our investors. Some have fallen nearly 20% against the U.S. dollar, pushing down the dollar value of stocks in those markets. Simultaneously oil and gold have seen significant declines from their highs in the early part of 2008, which has punished the share prices of commodity-related stocks. The resulting paper declines in our portfolios have been painful to watch. As I’m sure many of you are aware, all of my own investments adhere strictly to our philosophy, so my concern is not academic.In such an environment it is natural that some of you may be questioning the basic beliefs that originally led you to Euro Pacific. If economic conditions were unfolding differently than what we had expected, then I would share your concerns. Fortunately for our investors, the scenario that I laid out earlier in the decade, which saw an ugly end to America’s bubble economy, is playing out almost exactly as I had predicted.The problem as I see it is that the vast majority of global investors are still chasing phantoms and clinging to false hopes. I believe the markets have now diverged from reality. This is not the first time in recent history that this has happened. But in the end reality can be defied only so long, and I am absolutely confident that those who refuse to succumb to the madness will be redeemed. Fortunately for virtually all of our clients, by avoiding margin and other investment gimmicks, they are not forced to sell, and are in position to ride out the tempest.The latest “catalyst” noted for pushing up the dollar is the government’s recent bailout of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. If the market were functioning rationally, the resulting transference of staggering new liabilities to the U.S. Treasury would have been immediately seen as a catastrophe for the dollar. Instead the dollar has rallied.I believe this counter intuitive reaction results from two forces. First, by transforming trillions of dollars of suspect mortgage backed securities into seemingly bullet-proof Treasury bonds, the move has sparked a relief rally in the dollar as foreign investors no longer have to worry about defaults or markdowns. In fact, to holders of Fannie and Freddie debt, it no longer matters what happens to the housing market. Home prices can drop another 50%, every single homeowner can default on their mortgage, and bond holders will not lose one dime. This has emboldened foreign investors, and temporarily increased demand for both dollars and Freddie and Fannie debt.The second force is related to leveraged players, particularly hedge funds, around the globe unwinding their trades. Those who have been short the dollar are now buying those dollars back. Those who have been long gold, oil, and other commodities, are liquidating their positions. This massive, though in my view misguided, rush to the exits is causing sharp counter-trend price movements. However once speculators have been flushed from the market, I expect the primary trends to return stronger than ever.Had the government done the right thing and not guaranteed Freddie and Fannie debt, I believe we would now be experiencing outright financial crisis. The dollar would be falling sharply along with real estate prices, gold would be soaring and the recession would be deepening. However, by nationalizing Freddie and Fannie, the government has merely delayed the crisis. The borrowed time will cost us dearly, as the day of reckoning will now likely involve much steeper losses for our currency.$5.5 trillion dollars of formerly privately held mortgage backed securities are now, in effect, Treasury bonds. In addition, over the next year or two, my guess is that several trillion dollars of existing mortgages, not currently insured by Freddie or Fannie, will be transferred to the pile. Going forward the vast majority of new mortgages made to Americans will be bought by Fannie or Freddie, and will also become the equivalent of U.S. Treasury bonds. Therefore in a few short years there will be in excess of $10 trillion of new obligations for the U.S. Treasury.The defenders of the bailout claim that Fannie and Freddie debt does not represent true obligations because they are collateralized by homes. But anyone with a casual interest in the current real estate market knows that homes are now only worth a fraction of outstanding mortgage debt. And that fraction gets smaller every day. My guess is that $10 trillion of Federally insured mortgages will result in $2 trillion or more of losses. That amounts to more than $25,000 per American family.I do not see how the government could possibly cover these losses through legitimate means (taxation or borrowing). To make good, they must rely on the printing press to create money out of thin air. As a result, even though bond holders will get their dollars back, they will lose purchasing power.The Freddie and Fannie takeover does nothing to address the underlying problems that forced the companies into bankruptcy. All the bad mortgage debt still exists. In fact, based on this bailout, there will be trillions more in bad mortgages insured over the next few years. The only thing that has changed is how the losses will be distributed. Instead of falling solely on bond holders, who had chosen to invest in mortgage debt, they will now be dispersed among U.S. taxpayers and all holders of U.S. dollars, who made no such choices.It is my guess that annual Federal budget deficit will soon approach, and then exceed, $1 trillion, and that the national debt, including actual bonds and guaranteed mortgages, will soon exceed $20 trillion. When these untenable obligations force investors to shift focus from default risk to inflation risk, a mass exodus from both Treasuries and mortgage backed securities (now Treasuries in disguise) will ensue.Right now every asset on the planet is being sold except the U.S. dollar. To me this rally looks like the last gasp of a dying currency. Just like a toy rocket ship, once the dollar runs out of fuel it will crash back down to earth. In the mean time, I realize that it is difficult for Euro Pacific clients to watch the dollar value of their accounts fall every day.If you see the world as I do, we have no choice but to grin and bear it. The alternative is to sell our foreign stocks and get back into the dollar. However, I am confident that such a course of action will lead to total disaster. I feel sure that any current paper losses in our accounts will be temporary. However, the real losses that will befall holders of U.S. dollars will be permanent.For those of you on my mailing list who do not have accounts with me, or who have not already moved out of the dollar through other channels, recent events are a blessing in disguise. On the eve of what I see as a pending economic collapse of historic proportions, you have an unexpected ability to protect yourself. Right now the window of opportunity is wide open, –please climb though it before it is slammed shut.——————————————————————————–Mr. Schiff began his investment career as a financial consultant with Shearson Lehman Brothers, after having earned a degree in finance and accounting from U.C. Berkeley in 1987. A financial professional for nineteen years he joined Euro Pacific in 1996 and has served as its President since January 2000. Schiff is often quoted in major publications such as the Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, the Financial Times, the New York Times, and the Christian Science Monitor.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:49 pm
More good news:4:47 p.m.Rohm & Haas profit pinched by Hurricane Ike, merger costs4:46 p.m.Profit outlook dims at Kimberly-Clark4:43 p.m.Northwest swings to third-quarter loss4:39 p.m.CORRECT: Citrix Systems posts quarterly slip in profits
Stratonovich calculus • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Dispatches from the Apocalypse II1. Good friend’s family deeply involved in PHX RE—brother-in-law a builder, sister a broker. Very, very profitable. Tiffany boxes at Christmas for everyone, and not their entry-level silver stuff. They never even saw the bubble. They’re just fine, but the builder shut down his business (don’t know how many employees, multiplier effects), and the sister mortgage broker says she spends all her time with attorneys and in court trying to recoup money from people on the other side of the deals.2. Economics blog technical analysts: October 16: many “double bottom” calls. October 22: yet more “double bottom” calls.
ChetCongoApeManatLarge • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:55 pm
The triangle now in place on the Dow chart is very dangerous. It is roughly 2000 points wide which, if we fall below the low set today, tomorrow, the Dow is free to drop to 6300. Just food for thought
Mark • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:55 pm
John,I fully understand what you’re saying (always have). But what I can’t figure out is what happens AFTER. By giving everyone a house where is the economic activity? I know that we’ll never again see the housing-generated economic activity that we did, but how will any of this really contribute to a stable economic system? NOTE: I’d be the last one to try and define some “new” economic system, as I don’t really like systems to begin with, but there’s enough historical momentum out there to say that odd are in the favor of some new system being foisted upon us.Food, shelter, water… You’ve addressed shelter. Food and water is another matter, requiring a lot more turnover (housing could stabilize, but not sure about food and water).
Forensic economist • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:00 pm
News from California with relevance to easternersShorenstein Company, one of the largest commerical landlords in San Francisco and Oakland, has announced that it will build a 23 story office building in downtown Oakland. (yes, the city of $40,000,000 budget shortfall, 40 murders per 100,000 population, high foreclosure rates, overbuilt condo market, etc) It has no tenants lined up. Construction costs will be $400 – $500 per net rentable square foot. Shorenstein and its partner believe that when it opens in 2011 rents will be sufficient to pay for the construction cost. Construction financing is to be from Pacific National Bank.Relevance to you on the East Coast: the equity partner is Met Life. Who is your retirement with?By the way, part of my business is doing accounting/ economic work for landlords being sued for wrongful eviction. It’s a growing field.
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I think most traders are starring at it right now. Just about any news can trigger it.On the bright side: 6300 would be a hell of a capitulation point and (local) bottom.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:13 pm
Almost. Not quite. Get a life.
Deflationista • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Schiff just screwed alot of people, his recommendations were WRONG, with the amount of debt that was waiting to implode there could only have been one outcome. DEFLATION. The only right call was to short the market and it remains so. You may say that hindsight is a millionaire but not for us deflationistas who had to deal with the hyper inflation, goldbug, and commodities rallying to the sun crowd. There will be a time for gold but not now. Schiff was WRONG and hes paying the price I just feel sorry for those who followed him off the cliff. Mish was right and has called it spot on.
non-economist • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:23 pm
Wachovia Posts Largest-Ever Loss for a Bankhttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/22/AR2008102201873.html
Wachovia posted a $23.9 billion quarterly loss…
$23.9 billion loss in one quarter (3 months). wow.face it folks, this is worse than that old Great Depression. Just as the “Great War” was eventually renamed to “World War I”, the “Great Depression” will have to be renamed to “World Depression I”…or something similar:-) At least it would get the approval of the dynamic duo (US and UK) as it brings up the facet that it is not just them who have a depression.
furiouscalves • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:27 pm
the feds balance sheet became that way because of the failure of the i-banks business model. the solution was for the fed to start using the i-banks business mode. guess what? That is failing, so they have asked the government to use the i-banks business model to help them out.well the buck stops with uncle sam. and guess what? the US will be bankrupt soon. all because of myopic vision by the financial industry- using the same methods that worked for awhile and subsequently failed miserably.i think that they have made a huge mistake. i think that the governments of the world need to void all cds contracts, and let the corporations that are insolvent fail and pay out nothing to the the cds holders on the money side of the trades. screw them. the cds system is in essence a way for a trader to gain full leverage and place all the risk on the system. it is riskless (for them). because everyone has risk, no one has risk. because everyone is protected, no one is protected. because everyone pays, no one pays.that should include governments. they cant even do it. its over. try anyone and everyone that has ever traded a cds contract for treason in whatever country they are from. do not attempt to regulate the cds market, just kill it and kill it now. it is a virus that essentially rewards those who trade them at the expense of the financial system. it is a movement whose end game is riskless money for the traders, but pure risk for the system and the people of the world. they have gamed the world financial system. punish them appropriately.dont let them take down world governments and their taxpayers. let JP morgan fail to save the “non JP morgan people” who they have sucked dry.don’t let them think they are patriots upholding the american ideal- they are – guilty of treason.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:35 pm
that Argentinian President Cristina Kirchner looks quite nice, by the way…
Allan Green • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:48 pm
When are we going to see Stephen Roach invited to this forum?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Very interesting stuff – if it’s not too much trouble from which points on the chart would create the triangle? and when if ever have you seen such a thing before — thanks
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:54 pm
ka plunk… – this is all because you were banished yesterday isn’t it
devils advocate • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:02 pm
deflation will be handled by printing $$$$ — welfare … food stamps …. free housingcrime will rise as it did in Argentina when it suffered hard times…especially in USA where family structure has broken down so much..PLUS ******LOOK BELOW*****$1 + 1/2 trillions into infrastructure = how many new jobs?say, $100,000 per year per job divided into 1 1/2 trillion =1,500,000,000,000 or 1500 billions1 billion = 1,000,000,000 or 1000 millions1 million = 1,000,000 or 1000 thousandsso, 1,000,000 = 10 hundred thousands or 10 jobs1 billion = 1000 x 10 = 10,000 jobs1 1/2 trillion = 1500 x 10,000 = 15,000,000 jobsYES! WE ARE INVINCIBLE!!!
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:04 pm
Via Across the Curve:
Feeling the Pain at WalmartLOS ANGELES (Reuters) – Wal-Mart Stores Inc’s U.S. customers, increasingly worried about their own financial security, are waiting until they get their paychecks to buy even the most basic necessities, the retailer’s U.S. division head said on Tuesday.He said credit used as a form of payment at Wal-Mart is falling and that the decline is expected to reach into the double digits this year.
WOW, deflation!
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:08 pm
Funny, some time ago I wrote a post on my blog (in Italian) just about how GD II will be called and came to the exact same parallel.http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/2008/08/la-seconda-grande-depressione.html
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:21 pm
I’ve recently heard that Roubini uses astrological methods (financial astrology) when making economic predictions, similar to famed trader and market guru William Delbert Gann [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Delbert_Gann ] — does anyone know if there is any truth to this?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:56 pm
AH Argentina…ungovernable just like Italy because, HEY!, most of its citizens are of at least partial Italian descent.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:00 pm
Kill the rich and share their stuff out. No point killing the poor even though we want to they have nothing to take.
painter • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:03 pm
Does anyone know what happened with the Lehman derivatives auction ? Wasn’t today the day of finding out how much was due ?
Lord Sidcup • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:07 pm
I agree with medic. John you have some good points but your style of writing leaves me flecked with spit and wanting to move along hurridly.In particular the references seem obscure.
Hugo Chavez • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:14 pm
I’d like to know too. Can’t get my equity out of you Americans!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Lehman ‘swaps’ close-out a success, derivatives group says3:45 PM, October 21, 2008Sellers and buyers of credit default swaps on Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. debt settled up today, and the financial system seemed no more worse for the wear and tear.There has been an undercurrent of fear in markets in recent weeks that some sellers of swaps (a form of insurance) on debt of bankrupt Lehman would be unable to make good on their commitments to the swap buyers, triggering a new cascade of financial trouble. An estimated $6 billion to $8 billion was supposed to change hands at settlement.In a statement, the International Swaps and Derivatives Assn. declared the settlement a “success,” and said Lehman’s default and the workout of related swap transactions “have not created the financial disruption that critics of the credit default swap business have claimed.”That’s what we’d expect the ISDA to say, of course. They’re looking out for their livelihood, amid a deepened public mistrust of derivative securities and the potential threat they pose to the financial system.It’s still not clear to me that we won’t hear about some hedge fund or other market player being unable to make good on a Lehman swap payment. But if a huge calamity was brewing, you’d figure we’d know by now.In the meantime, read Reuters’ take on the settlement here, and a piece by MarketWatch.com here. The ISDA statement, which does include some helpful explanation, is here (click on the entry “ISDA CEO Notes Success of Lehman … “).
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:21 pm
I’ve read somewhere that it went mostly smoothly with just rumors about a couple corpse on the ground (imploded hedge funds, no news). No link, sorry.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:25 pm
I actually gave some thought to taking you up on your challenge to evaluate your list an its relationships.Then I noted your qualification: Objectively.After reading your comments, responses to others, attempting to read your book, and finding a lack of correlation with other authors and scholars, I conclued that even if I should take up your challenge, I would assuredly be accused of some measure of partiality should my findings in any way diverge from yours.
artichoke • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:29 pm
John,Why would foreclosures result in empty houses? You’re going to implement the “maintenance regime” whereby people whose home mortgages are foreclosed may continue to occupy their houses indefinitely.Right?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:30 pm
He’s not wrong the more desperate the system gets the more money will be printed Schiff will be right like you can’t imagine.
Medic • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:31 pm
See? You did well there for a post or two, but then just like that – right down the same path.Dude, you are an angry and frustrated man. I bet no one takes you seriously at home huh? Well, if you explain yourself there like you do here, I can understand why.Enough of you. Back under your rock. But don’t say we didn’t listen (or try to listen) to what you had to say. It’s not our fault you communicate with the clarity of an alcoholic on his third day of a bender. I will be skipping over anything that resembles a post that came from you. Bye now……
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:33 pm
I’m not so sure. If the house prices went up, lots of those CDOs would be worth something, their owners would be creditworthy, the CDS would no longer have to pay off, and everything would be hunky dory. Or at least better.But if you reduce people’s mortgages, the people are saved but the banks not.Actually that’s OK, let the banks evaporate and start new ones. If all the factories and houses are still here, a disappearance of the debts would be a good thing overall.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:40 pm
that explains that cute President;-)
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:43 pm
when people cannot afford to shop on credit even at mall-wart, the economy must be really bad
Medic • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Well that does not explain the chicken blood that seeps from under his door. I hear he is also into VOODOO and black magic – oh, and he likes to play Beatles albums backwards.It’s either that or he is a smart guy who utilizes what he has learned via education and a lifetime of experience. I guess you can go either way…….Get under Ryskamp’s rock with him – you are being punished. No posting for 24 hours.
Santa Claus • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:44 pm
shut up Hugo
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Roubini the Financial Rock Star!Maybe if he writes a Book titled ‘ The heart of a liberal” he would get a Nobel prize too> just maybe.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:59 pm
Lets Party! I have over 1.2 Mil in T bills waiting to pick up the bargains at the bottom.. those who have saved and planned ahead will prosper..Might even sail to Iceland I hear their women ar lovely.
Medic • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:14 pm
And in dire need of cash….I bet even Ryskamp could get lucky there.Nah. Not in a whorehouse with a fist full of hundreds…….
villager • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:20 pm
NR not only spoke of a 2-year time frame for the recession, he used ‘weasel’ words thereby suggesting that the recession could be longer like Japan in the 1990′s if the right policies and stimulus are not applied correctly. While Nouriel explicitly describes a U-shaped rather than V-shaped recession, he definitely left possibility for an L-shaped recession.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:23 pm
read capone’s article on this site
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:26 pm
sorry here is the link and I think we know now given the state of the markets…http://www.rgemonitor.com/economonitor-monitor/254052/lehman_cds_payout_on_october_21_360bn_or_6bn
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:40 pm
The world governments did not trade CDS. Why should they even be involved? The best solution would be for the CDS market to clear naturally. Doesn’t clear, no problem. If the current banks are out of commission, let entrepreneurs start new ones, or let truly healthy ones (Wells Fargo claims to be such) to reap all the benefits from this situation.Oh, and for any bank that has participated in any of the Fed or Treasury liquidity programs, bonuses must be limited to 20% of base salary this year and for the next several years. That should be enough that those who lived a bit beyond their base salaries (almost everyone at the big banks and former investment banks) can pay their bills, and no more.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:58 pm
No he was wrong. He lost money therefore he was wrong. He would certainly agree, in fact he did agree in what he wrote.He may be right in the future. He may even be right soon. But he was wrong.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:00 pm
The middle class gleefully helped in off-shoring? I don’t think so, unless you define the CEO’s and VP’s who make the decisions to off-shore as middle class. The middle class had little to gain and much to lose from off-shoring.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:05 pm
If people have houses, they can probably generate enough economic activity to feed themselves and heat them. That’s easier than generating enough to feed themselves, heat the houses and pay for the houses. Sure there could be counterintuitive feedback effects, but this is the simplest and most likely result.Sure there would be less economic activity as people are not forced to work 18 hours a day to survive. That would be a GOOD thing.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Deflation is only bad if it’s your assets that are deflating. Houses have mostly already deflated, or at least if people can afford to stay in them, they serve their purpose of providing shelter. Most of us are neither gold producers nor oil producers, so deflation in those sectors is good for us.But I’m all in favor of some more printing. Finally Ben, you’ve taken a deep breath and printed, now print some more please before our debts become utterly unpayable.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:19 pm
“We are dying of hunger.” That is sad. How can the Dick Fulds of the world stand themselves.
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:23 pm
Or, one could put aside West Coast Hotel thinking and reason like a human being. Isn’t something wrong in a prosperous society, with all sorts of means of production, we are throwing so many of our fellows out of their homes? Is it just slightly possible that significant fault lies with the system or elswhere than the debtors who are in default?That so many cannot think this way, and act on that thinking, may be why they earn the title “ape” from Mr. Ryskamp.
furiouscalves • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
The governments now have skin in the game (what seems to be pretty much the only skin of value (the future earning of taxpayers) – they should be involved.
furiouscalves • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:24 pm
The governments now have skin in the game (what seems to be pretty much the only skin of value (the future earning of taxpayers) – they should be involved.
artichoke • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I hereby invite him fwiw. But since he’s stopped being Chief Economist and become Chairman of the Asia Region for Morgan Stanley, he’s writing for the public a bit less and no doubt schmoozing a whole lot more.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:51 pm
Women would swoon for his argument that people are more important than creditor-banks. If he chose to stop pontificating and use his other charms, whatever they are, I think he could be lucky indeed among the Icelandic fair sex.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:58 pm
when the world mkts are racing to the bottom and people on this blog starting to talk about Ryskamp, sex, getting luckyi know there is something wrong..Maybe Ben Maschiah have put a spell on all of us!!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:11 pm
Carnage selling in Asia right now…http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/stocks/wei_region3.html
Michelle • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Get rid of the garbage CDS! These instruments are destroying global markets and are the PRIMARY reason lending is frozen. Firms won’t lend because of the systemic risks and is no less than having a death warrant out against you. A race to zero is clearly foreseeable and unless some rapid action is taken expect to be poor and hungry soon. Every corner of the globe is affected and there is no escaping this horrific wrath as greed will persevere rather than common sense. Prepare yourselves as once the unraveling begins it makes no difference what country you live in or what currency you hold. We have passed the point of no return and a barter system is all that will remain. Fiat currency is dead.
Stratonovich calculus • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:30 pm
NR on NPR: Teaching Business Students To Be Skeptics.
All Things Considered, October 22, 2008 · Nouriel Roubini, an economics professor at NYU’s Stern School of Business, teaches his class to be wary of trends that seem to be going too well on Wall Street. Roubini and some of his students talk about what they’ve learned.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:45 pm
it can all be traced back to yesterday afternoon when StocksGoinGreen was given an eviction notice from the board – or perhaps it`s just a coincidence -but you are correct this is a surreal and there is something wrong – a slow motion fall to earth – the Nikkei flirting with a seven handle and the first glimmers of the depth of depravity on Wall Street -but when the historians look back (hopefully there will be irrefutable eye witness accounts since no would believe it possible) the most surreal thing they will discover was that the architect responsible for trying to fix this crisis was also one of its authors, who as then CEO of Goldman Sachs testified in February 2000 before the Senate Banking Committee for less regulation and higher leverage.Not even a ‘cow’ could structure a plot like that.
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:51 pm
That or Mr. Bullocks is making a sweet dream where all bloggers turned into cows and he is calling everybody bullocks.
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:57 pm
The 50 trillion dollar question is how to get rid of the toxic stuff? If this unwinds there will be no market at all.
hazleton • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:09 pm
Are you sure T Bills are completely safe? What if the U.S. goes bankrupt?
AfA - moooody's rated • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:09 pm
“Not even a ‘cow’ could structure a plot like that.”Maybe, but some S&P official said: “It could be structured by cows and we would rate it.”How fit! It’s like a kid given a scissor. Next time you hear US Treasuries are AAA-rated, picture a cow.
2cents • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:10 pm
I think there is a great deal of insight in this passage from Irving Fisher.… and if the over-indebtedness with which we started was great enough, the liquidation of debts cannot keep up with the fall of prices which it causes. In that case, liquidation defeats itself. While it diminishes the number of dollars owed, it may not do so as fast as it increases the value of each dollar owed. Then, the very effort of individuals to lessen their burden of debts increases it, because of the mass effect of the stampede to liquidate in swelling each dollar owed.Then we have the great paradox which, I submit, is the chief secret of most, if not all, great depressions: The more the debtors pay, the more they owe. The more the economic boat tips, the more it tends to tip. It is not tending to right itself, but is capsizing. But if the over-indebtedness is not sufficiently great to make liquidation thus defeat itself, the situation is different and simpler. It is then more analogous to a stable equilibrium; the more the boat rocks the more it will tend to right itself.— ”The Debt-Deflation Theory of Great Depressions”, Econometrica, October 1933Read more hereI think the whole game right now is to trim the velocity of liquidation to ameliorate the tendency to kick the feedback loop into high gear. If so, then the PTB know that they are trading deepness of liquidation against a longer time frame. The question becomes how well can they read the “decelerometer” and do they have sufficient tools to adjust as much and for as long as will be required?
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:22 pm
And as their government does things like this to them, there is nothing the people can do about it.Maybe they will find something they can do about it. And I don’t mean voting for the self-described “Change” candidate who received the most donations from Wall Street.
2cents • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:23 pm
Also, in the full article noted above there is thisThe core of our crisisWe borrowed too much. As I explained here, there are only four ways to solve this problem.1) grow out of the debt2) inflate the debt away3) default on the debt4) socialize the debt — spread it out over a larger population, such as having the government assume the loansDebt deflation is path #3. The US government is attempting to switch the economic train to track #4.I guess NR might argue that time allows all 4 scenarios to take place and thus lessen the destructive forces due to any single path. Note: I’m not speaking for NR nor do I know what he is thinking, but this might be an arguable position for his “socialistic” stance as of late. Indeed, routes 1 and 2 require the passing of sufficient time, whereas option 3 is the “natural” response, which leaves option 4 as the only immediately actionable alternative.
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:24 pm
Shouldn’t be like this. I never bought nor sold CDS.But I am net short dollars because I owe a mortgage. I don’t mind if the debt is inflated away and we start over with something fresh. Or if CDS are cancelled. Or whatever else doesn’t involve me, because I have no fault in this.
Michelle • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:27 pm
That’s the common sense part to which I am referring. “No market at all” is what we’re facing because the counterparties believe the paper they’re holding has value, even if it means total destruction and social unrest. Debt forgiveness, or something akin, is possible. If I chose not to pursue a debt as I believe the effects to be devastating, I can forgive the debt. The holdouts aka greedy pigs, are the ones that will cause the system to collapse. Unfortunate.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:27 pm
This advice was a loser for many years as the mortgage business went from one absurd year to the next one even more absurd. And most of those people are still employed doing … mortgages! I don’t know what they do, but the business still exists and presumably trading still exists.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:29 pm
I don’t understand how Debt Deflation amounts to Default on the Debt. The default doesn’t happen unless contracts are broken. Is the implication that all those debtors will go thru bankruptcy and have the contracts modified? If so that assumption should be stated.
AfA - pHd • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:30 pm
Bernanke’s next assignment, due next week:1-Design a new facility to guarantee/bailout pensions and retirement systems. (1 point)2-Hire JPMorgan as manager. (3 points)3-Find a new acronym for the new program (6 points)NB: this assignment is part of the PowerPoint Team (PPT) project of your choice: “Print hard or die for free”; or “Get inflated or die trying”.Additional readings: Calpers Loses More than 20% Since June; Calculated Risk
Michelle • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:37 pm
Unfortunately, living in a society means we have to put up with other people’s mistakes, bad habits, etc. Nobody was complaining when all this corruption was happening so long as the stock market went up and home values appreciated to extraordinary levels. Did anyone question why this was happening? Not one, everyone was celebrating, taking vacations, buying fancy cars, and loading the large house with luxurious furniture. Now that the $hit has hit the fan, everyone’s furious. Can’t have it both ways I’m afraid.
2cents • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:43 pm
If you and I have a contract for widgits and you send me widgits for 3 months and I never pay you, then I defaulted! I didn’t file bankruptcy and I didn’t modify the contract. It’s now up to you to decide whether it’s worth your while to pursue me!Think about it!
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:45 pm
Yes, it’s called a Jubilee.It would solve our current crisis, for almost everyone.
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:48 pm
Guest, it is not always that default=bankruptcy. A loan may default for example, but not the institution. In my opinion, Debt deflation is a consequence of Default on Debt. When a homeowner cannot pay his/her mortgage and defaults, the corresponding value is written off by the bank, thus debt is reduced/deflated. I argued before that any debt created through leverage is a momentary money supply (or better liquidity supply?) … oops I misread your comment.Yes you are right. But we can still argue that the event horizon is not when a bank acknowledges a debt has defaulted but rather the time when the debtor is enable to pay it back. A little bit like the difference between the time when MBIA (and UST) was downgraded by the market and the time S&P and Moody’s downgraded.
2cents • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:50 pm
Good Afa! But I think that falls outside of the Special Vehicle alphabet soup rules! You see, the ultimate benefit would seemingly be to the hard working stiffs. The rules only allow important and significant parties to receive funds from these programs.
Brian • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:52 pm
In the event that the market drops steeply again over the next two days, what actions do you think the fed will take?So far, all the actions have really been to deal with the “Credit Crisis,” which crisis was very real, but also very separate from the other, underlying crisis, which is that the consumer is over-burdened with debt, and there is no demand for credit at the consumer level (at least, no demand from consumers who could actually qualify).If the market drops again for two more days, we all know that the Fed will want to pull a bunny out of their hat to stop a runaway crash on Monday. But this time, they would have to take action other than cutting rates or bailing out symptomatic institutions.I can only think that some action that would help consumers rapidly and substantially could stem a market selloff that is based on bad earnings and realistic forecasts of doom.I don’t think the Fed has any bullets of this caliber that they can fire. I don’t think a weekend-bunny will materialize this time. I think this week and next, assuming a substantial market drop Thursday and Friday, will see a market collapse.I’m wondering if anyone has any thoughts on what the Fed might do that I haven’t thought of.
Mark • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:57 pm
I think that you have to develop this a bit further than “can probably.” Hope management isn’t going to cut it.Sure, eventually people will adjust, but in the short-term it’s going to be really a mess.
Mark • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:03 pm
Hey, quit picking on cows! You know, they’re going to rise up and kick back at us don’t ya know?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IJBbtkBMMs
Nedhead • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:10 pm
Who said “I’m going long on lube!!!”I’m still laughing, thanks
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:17 pm
TomorrowYou forgot to say tomorrow; “what if the US goes bankrupt – tomorrow”. Otherwise, there is no need for the “IF”.
Jubilee • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:19 pm
See?!?! Jubilee!It’s a Jubilee year, and in honor of that unalterable fact, I will now take the name of Jubilee to remind us all of what might be possible.Here’s your Leadership… who wants to follow?
AfA • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:34 pm
If that was your only concern, we can always flip it some way to benefit the said parties (I never been to one, have you?). Do you know that pensions are among the biggest “investors” in Private Equities? or for those with a taste for some Illuminati conspiracy BS – CalPERS’s logo is a pyramid and half eye.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:57 pm
History in the making and we are the actors!!someone said its surreal, it sure feel unreal,i guess all that brainwashing, movies, Cable TV dumb us “down”,Earth/The World has an illustrious history of events, ancient Egypt, Greek, Rome, The Islamic Caliphs, Renaissance, crusaders.. supported by fine actors such as Julius Caesar,Cleopatra, Queen Isabella, Sallahuddin Al Ayubbi, Alexander the Great, Genghis, Shakespeare, Da Vinci, PtolemyI still can’t believe ww2 happened..its time wake up from our long sleep and realize we are not watching a movie, we are the actors and are about to receive a one big knock in the head
Theta • October 23rd, 2008 at 12:18 am
I’m not sure he was referring to people who did all the celebrating. My husband and I truly have no fault in all of this. We were one of the first round of sub-prime mortgages back in 2001, and we KNEW we were sub prime. So after we were approved we tightened our belts and worked our butts off for the next five years until we could honestly have afforded our own house. This past summer we refinanced into a shorter term at a lower rate and were looking forward to actually being able to take our first family vacation. That’s been canceled and now we’re tightening our belts again so we have some cushion if things really go south. I agree that you can’t have it both ways, but I reserve the right to a little righteous indignation from those of us who have acted responsibly and are still going to get screwed.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 12:22 am
I went to one of Schiff’s investment seminars and even read his book. I left unconvinced and fortunately did not transfer my money to his firm. I found Roubini shortly thereafter, and he made sense to me. In January and February, I moved all of my money out of the stock market and into the money market.I think that down the line, some of what Schiff is saying may come true, but not in the near future. Deflation is the name of the game right now.However, I am a believer in the longer term value of gold and continue to dollar cost average my purchases. I basically buy 1-2 ounces of gold every month.So, cash and gold are king in my book.The lesson in all this: Be very careful who you trust with your money. Investment managers are like real estate agents. It is all about them and their commission and not about you. If you are reading Roubini, you are better equipped to handle your investments then most of them.Thank you Professor Roubini. My kids and their college funds thank you too.
AfA • October 23rd, 2008 at 12:29 am
An overdue one then, because, although I was not there 50 years ago, I don’t think it was celebrated last time. Question though, does the manumitting of slaves applies to non-jews?IMO, you are correct about the word, but not the meaning. I would guess the Administration is applying the Jubilee concept, but in its Roman Catholic version; “the name is applied to a holy year when special privileges are given for the pilgrimage to [the FRBNY]“.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 1:17 am
look at Nikkei Index for todaythey registered a drop of 7% at one time (before midday break)and now it is only 2% down…TPTB will do anything man, they will even sell their pants to get extra funding (sorry should be sell our pants)
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 2:59 am
welcome to hyper-inflationary stagdeflation HELLimagine that!! keep cash you lose, keep gold you loseif one were to disregard the USD index and take into consideration M3, the dollar is cooked “well done”and as for gold, they can suppress the actual value of it infinitely, whats the purpose in storing them then?? they can keep this go on and on and on as long the military/police/political establishment is with them..so if one is betting on gold that would mean they expect whole establishment collapses, if it comes to that i think canned foods is a better investmenthttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601068&sid=acUVeF0.Sm68&refer=economyBernanke May Seek New Ways to Ease Credit as Fed Rate Nears 1%By Craig TorresOct. 23 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve officials are likely to bring interest rates down so aggressively over the next few months that they will have to search for fresh tactics to continue easing credit.The Fed’s Open Market Committee will probably reduce the benchmark federal funds rate by half a point next week to 1 percent, the lowest since May 2004, according to futures trading. The official rate has never been lower since the Fed made it an explicit target in the late 1980s.Further cuts below 1 percent could turn Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s focus away from the main rate and toward more use of alternative tools. Those might include increasing its holdings of mortgage bonds to lower costs for homebuyers and purchasing securities directly from the Treasury in order to pump more cash into the economy, Fed watchers said.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 3:31 am
Where does inflation fit in your scheme?Either for the future or for the 1930s?
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 4:23 am
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10648Sen. Warner Supports Domestic Use of MilitarySenator Warner Responds to Concern Over Posse Comitatus Violation by Proposing to Change the LawA citizen of Virginia named Moya Atkinson wrote to Senator John Warner to express concern over the recent violation of the Posse Comitatus Act created by the assigning of U.S. soldiers to duty within the United States, reported by the Army Times as intended for “crowd control” among other duties. This, like other changes imposed by President Bush, of course violates the Posse Comitatus Act. It also served to strengthen the threats of martial law that Congressman Brad Sherman reported the White House making to Congress members in order to win their support for the $780 billion give-away to Wall Street.Warner sent back the following note, proposing that, rather than changing the president’s behavior to comply with the law, we should — as with warrantless spying, habeas corpus, etc. — change the law to comply with the president’s behavior:Thank you for contacting me regarding your opposition to Northern Command dedicating a combat infantry team to work within the United States. I appreciate your thoughtful inquiry on this important matter.As you may know, the Northern Command has assigned the 1st Brigade Combat Team of the 3rd Infantry to deal with catastrophes in the United States. While the unit would not take over as the lead, the Army reports that this unit would be deployed to help local, state, or federal agencies deal with matters such as chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive (CBRNE) incidents. The unit will be based in Fort Stewart, Georgia, and will focus primarily on logistics and support for local police and rescue personnel.Looking back, the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts highlighted the important role our military plays during domestic crises. From providing security in destroyed neighborhoods, to treating patients aboard naval vessels, to rebuilding damaged levees and unwatering New Orleans, the military has performed vital work that no other federal or state entity has the capacity to undertake.Not withstanding these tremendous achievements, I am deeply concerned that the Department of Defense and the President may not have authority to use active duty personnel in the most effective manner. In our federal system, we normally, and rightly, depend upon state and local authorities to maintain order and protect the public. The National Guard, operating under Title 32 of the U.S. Code, is the primary military organization authorized to employ police powers in times of crisis. However, in a situation of the magnitude of Hurricane Katrina, the level of destruction, coupled with the difficulty in maintaining order, brings into question the prohibition on using federal active duty military personnel, operating under Title 10 of the U.S. Code, to perform law enforcement duties.I believe we must review the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act and similar provisions that limit the role of the active duty military to ensure that every available asset is properly employed in any type of future emergency situation. Title 18, Section 1385 of the U.S. Code, commonly referred to as the Posse Comitatus Act, prevents the armed forces from becoming involved in law enforcement activities for which, in most cases, they are not specifically trained or equipped. Posse Comitatus is largely rooted in historical tradition that prohibits military involvement in civilian affairs.To be clear, I do not believe that U.S. law pertaining to this matter needs to be entirely rewritten. I do, however, think it is necessary that we review the regulations governing use of military personnel in domestic operations in order to better understand how all of our military assets can best assist during emergency situations.Once again, thank you for contacting me on this issue.With kind regards, I amSincerely,John WarnerUnited States Senator
Incognito • October 23rd, 2008 at 4:43 am
The problem with the US economy arises from the borrowers’ income. Suppose there is one bank in an economy and you get a mortgage to buy a house. After the purchase, the money is transferred to the seller, and the seller deposits the money in the same bank account. Now, as long as the borrower pays the money, the depositor should not worry about the health of the bank. However, if the money is not paid, the deposited amount may get lost since it is backed with nothing under default.In today’s economy, we are not in a different scheme than the example given above. A considerable number of borrowers defaulted and the depositors’ money is not backed with any asset given the defaults in various types of loans. Therefore, the liquidity injections are there to keep the depositors’ money (thus the lenders’ money) safe by artificially keeping the banks alive. Here, the hope is to reinflate the asset values in the economy by preventing further downturn. That’s why, keeping the credit system up (thus artificially keeping the banks alive) is important since this is the only way to reinflate the system in the short term.However, the problem is that there are not enough borrowers in the economy. This is due to the reduced income levels, because most of the productive businesses are transferred to the emerging markets due to the higher value addition possibilities in these countries. This value is then transferred backed to people’s hand in terms of loans rather than income (i.e. The debt funding of the US obtained from China). This, in turn, caused further money transfer from these people and led a large sum to be gathered under the hands of a few. This situation continued up to a point where the equilibrium between borrowers and lenders is broken.Now, the central banks’ aim is to keep the depositors (a.k.a. the lenders) alive so that their money can be transferred back to borrowers in some form with the hope that the asset prices will be reinflated. I don’t think that this is possible since the economy is still on its deleveraging path. Otherwise, we would see a slowing in the downturn in the very short run. In the long run, I believe these actions will be inflationary given that the injected money will have to be monetized to save the credit system since the number of people/businesses who will be in default is large. The large number of defaults is due to:(1) The lack of income generating productive resources in developed nations because they are transferred to emerging nations due to their cost advantages. Thus, the possibility of purchasing power increase in developed nations in terms of wages is lessened.(2) The misuse of credit derivatives provided that they allowed bankers to use fewer reserves for the loans.Since credit default swaps (CDSs) are insurance products, their use allowed for the creation of excess credit. Today, the deleveraring is happening over this excess credit since it’s backed with nothing. The excess credit amount is huge given the size of the credit market (the net exposure was USD 9 trillion in 2007 – a figure given by ISDA). That’s why; we call the money used for the collateralization of the banking system as pocket money.
AGolfer • October 23rd, 2008 at 6:18 am
At this point nothing makes sense so try astrology – lunar signs point to market crash Oct 24th or Oct 27th. Happened 9 out of the last 11 depresssions/panics (exceptions were Asian coinciding with Tianamen Sq). Get ready.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 6:35 am
Welcome to Hyper-Inflationary StagDeflation HELLThis phrase coined by Guest on 2008-10-23 02:59:09 (above) perfectly encapsulates what is underway. There is no place to hide.
Ashu • October 23rd, 2008 at 6:45 am
The market is correcting due to the fair value accounting principles……..fight in tier 1 vs. tier 2 vs. tier 3 capital to mark up the capital adequacy ratio. these tiers have big assumptions behind them and when some of the underlying parameters change, they bring a big negative effect to the balance sheets.
Ashu • October 23rd, 2008 at 6:59 am
The gov. bailout warrants making the tier 1 capital worse for banks. so they are now changing the accounting rules.
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:02 am
FED is next to irrelevant, right now. They will cut 50bps or more and the market will most probably sell the news.The Treasury and Congress have still a couple of bullets. If we look at what they did in Pakistan, clearly the financial model for TPTB we can come up with the following wild guesses:* “temporary” all around ban on short sales* “temporary” closing down the derivative market (options and future contracts)* “temporary” closing down the stock market* “temporary” ban on trades that are more than 5% below a government set price for every stock (insane? but if they did in Pakistan, it must work!)/sarcasm off
kilgores • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:30 am
Guess the Senator thinks the Virginia National Guard won’t be sufficient to quell civil unrest in his state if everything falls apart…SWK
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:35 am
Actually it is the 130 Trillion dollar question
PhilW • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:35 am
Please can anyone answer me this:Look at these chartshttp://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/fds/hi/business/market_data/stockmarket/default.stmThe UK FTSE, French CAC, and German DAX, all bottom simultaneously at almost exactly 10am and 11am GMT.How does this synchronisation work?Day after day they’re pretty well synchronised, but sometimes it gets uncanny
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:36 am
or a fart in a hurricane
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:39 am
All Europe moves with the US futures (and vice-versa, don’t know which market is bigger). Anyway high correlation everywhere probably due to the people playing arbitrage.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:39 am
After one week of daily declines, 3 month LIBOR remained unchanged from Tuesday and his holding at 3.54, which is 300 bps above a healthy level. LIBOR Apparently yesterdays equity sell-off was encouraged by two hedgies that imploded… two down three hundred to go
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:41 am
make that unchanged from Wednesday
dof • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:57 am
JR … you’re pissed. I get it.Thanks for hanging in. I’m pissed too.I’d be interested in hearing SWK/kilgores’ thoughts on the legal aspects of your interpretation of this financial crisis.Thanks in advance for any input.London Banker … thoughts?
Anonymous • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:59 am
Re: proposal to guarantee pension systems.It does not seem fair to require the taxpayer to guarantee payments to recipients of private pension payments, since other taxpayers who do not enjoy such pensions created their own pensions through IRA investments – yet those IRA investments have decreased greatly in value.Doesn’t seem fair to make up the payments to the pension recipients, without making up the losses to the IRA recipients.Just sayin
jomos • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:59 am
Most people believe markets are data dependent and reason for the daily gyrations.But markets seem to be more socially connected like a herd.Why else would all our supposed intellectuals all come to the same conclusion every time,because fear has gripped them and they want to feel the security of the herd.Markets and our economic saviors are more touchy/feely and emotional based than they let on.Look how many times Bush and Paulson came on the air waves to calm us down,NO! They came on to calm themselves and their economic saviors of the world down.
jomos • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:04 am
I thought this was good enough to repost.”Most people believe markets are data dependent and reason for the daily gyrations.But markets seem to be more socially connected like a herd.Why else would all our supposed intellectuals all come to the same conclusion every time,because fear has gripped them and they want to feel the security of the herd.Markets and our economic saviors are more touchy/feely and emotional based than they let on.Look how many times Bush and Paulson came on the air waves to calm us down,NO! They came on to calm themselves and their economic saviors of the world down.”
Dan • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:07 am
I think you will have similar findings if you compare the charts of DOW and S&P500.
Fed Up in VA • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:17 am
Warner is an establishment guy posing in the garb of the Great Statesman With Gravitas.He’s an impostor. He doesn’t do any thinking outside the realm of supporting the status quo.You’ll never see any legislation from him to pro-actively address global warming, energy policy, education, or any other policy that rocks the boat and advances the fundamental welfare of our society.Given its political history, you’d think the State of Virginia would produce visionary leaders with the guts and determination to lead the nation.Instead, we get fops like John Warner whose main job is to keep the military money flowing, and to protect the sinecures of the slowly decaying “first families”, none of whom has done anything noteworthy since the Civil War.He’s retiring this year, and good riddance.Our other Senator, the fiery Jim Webb…you know, the one that wrote the book about himself entitled “A Time to Fight!”….well, when it came time to vote on the $700B bank bailout..he went right along with the party leaders, and sold us out.He didn’t understand the issues, his staff was clueless, despite efforts from around the globe to point the bailout toward the real economy, where it could actually do some good.One of the distinguishing characteristics of great leaders is that they can pick the right place to fight. They instinctively know where the strategic battles are, and where to position the troops to win. Is that what Senator Webb did?You see, when a Senator writes a book entitled “A Time To Fight!”, it encourages the reader to believe that he knows when that “time” is. The “time to fight” is when it’s time to fight.But he didn’t. There were no front-of-the-Capitol speeches decrying this latest theft by Wall Street. He didn’t even have the guts to vote “NO”.Instead, he rolled over. The great, illustrious, feisty “I come from a long family tradition of fighters, who stand up for the little guy” Senator…didn’t show up for the fight.Where were you, Senator Webb?Would the people of the Great State of Virginia please vote for someone with vision and courage?
PhilW • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:19 am
But no US markets are open at these times.Is one market leading, are they all watching each other, or are there major players playing all markets simultaneously?
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:27 am
All watch to each other (people playing arbitrage) and where there is more volume wins. This usually means the US market wins, but I’m not sure of the relative weight on US overnight sessions.Obviously even if local derivative is similare different markets can drift apart quite seriously.
Dan • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:30 am
I would think that “market movers” are doing their trades on a continual basis. They are trading in the “name” companies which usually are part of these two indexes. If you accept that a “long term” investor (rarity these days) will absolutely have no effects on daily market moves, then synchronization comes from the same group of people conducting computer controlled trading which covers number of companies from both indexes.
OuterBeltway • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:38 am
2Cents:When Fisher wrote this in 1933, the derivatives market, and computers, and hedge funds didn’t exist. He has not identified the other major source of risk: the immense and almost instant liquidation (“deleveraging”) of positions. As Nassim Taleb says, it’s the interlock of players and the speed with which they act that makes this situation especially dangerous.I agree with your assertion that it’s the velocity of deleveraging that is the greatest short-term threat. The deleveraging will happen, and should happen, it just needs to be rather gradual (2007, not late 2008 velocity).Therefore, I’d attack its two core aspects:a. Do an across-the-board size-and-frequency-of-trade limit on all markets. Just slow down the velocity of trades through artificial means – a “bank holiday” in slow motion. Restrict velocity.b. I’d do more stimulus, and direct it toward rust-belt/lower income areas, and do energy or educational or mass-transportation projects. No more stimulus to the financial sector. The financial sector’s issues are symptoms of the real economy.I’d do both fast. If I was the President, I’d do exec order right now to start both, and I’d dare the Congress to get in the way.
StocksGoingGreen supporter • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:40 am
Alright, looks like StocksGoingGreen is still asleep, so I take the chance to inform you thatSTOCKS WILL CLOSE AT 8800 TODAY!!! WOOOSH!
dof • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:43 am
SWK, your faith in the legal system intrigues me. I want to believe. Can you speak to Ryskamp’s assertions — see above — or is it impossible to contain financial and political elitism?Can law override power and greed?
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:45 am
Since people like to use letters (or keyboard characters) as a metaphore for the stock market trajectory, has anyone considered the possibility of a backslash shaped recession? Japan’s stock market is beginning to resemble the backslash more than an L.
StocksGoingGreen supporter • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:52 am
NO NEED FOR BACKSLASHS TODAY, YOU WILL NEED TO FIND THE / CHARACTER ON YOU KEYBOARD!! AND IF FERRIES ARE NICE TODAY YOU BETTER SWITCH TO GREEK CHARACTER SET AND USE THE Γ!!
Octavio Richetta • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:53 am
Wow! The situation is really as bad or even worse than what I saw coming as early as late 97.Those of you that follow my posts, read that, despite my bearish assessment of the situation, I went 15% long WW equities on Monday,; what can I tell you? The result so far have been 1.5% down in 2 days! Despite my modest long position I fully expect the market to, at the very least, test the 2003 lows (does anyone recall Gross’ 5000 call sometime in 2002? IMO, that is not out of the realm of possibility)I don’t regret my early move into equities, but it is worthwhile to point out some erroneous patterns in my investing behavior that repeat themselves and that hopefully will help you in your investing.I must start by confessing that I am an EXTREME risk taker (this may not come across in my posts), and that I only keep myself in check thanks to my learnings from past painful experiences and my modest knowledge of markets and investing derived from my training.My biggest learning in investing has been that risk control should be the number one consideration; but this does not come natural. As my shrink (back in Boston I don’t have one here) taught me, there is an emotional side and a rational side in each one of us. My emotional side is the risk taking side which I try to control via my rational side. To draw an analogy, I feel like a reformed alcoholic (do I smell an oxymoron?:-) trying to give advice at an AA meeting.So why did I go 15% in to equities Monday despite my telling you that stocks were AT BEST fairly valued, and that I didn’t think we had reached a bottom?1. Greed, and fear of being/looking like a fool. Since “buy the dips” has worked so well in the past, and with people like Buffet and Hussman saying this is the time to buy equities, I was afraid I was kiin the brink of becoming a perma-bear – I still remember this guy I met on a flight to Argenitna in the early 90s who was already 100% into cash! I guess I was afraid of becoming him – one of those characters that only hold cash and precious metals their whole life while history drives by proving equities are the best returning asset class.I guess that just like Buffet and Rogers, who try to look really smart by telling you that they are terrible short term traders; that they cannot pick a bottom (implying that market timing, even at the verge of a recession is for fools), I didn’t want to be left behind.2. Impatience. At the very least I could have used dollar cost averaging by jumping in at 1%/day the next 15 working days since the investments I chose had no cost associated with order size. My impatience is just additional evidence of greed, fear of missing the upside. Talking about being patient, brings me to 3.3. Ignoring the state of the art in economic cycle forecasting. Common wisdom is in line with Buffet’s and Roger’s views: The belief that it is impossible to forecast the economic cycle and thus market bottoms/tops. As you have read in my posts and elsewhere, the state of the art in economic forecasting (the folks at ECRI) have put up a very impressive record of forecasting economic cycles in the last 60 years and how this are related to stock market tops and bottoms. Even though their tools are far from infallible, as I have told you before, it is foolish to enter this market before the LLI/WLI turn around.Once again, I violated my own advice above yesterday by going 7% long commodities and 10% long TIPS which will probably keep nosediving given ECRI’s very negative FIG (future inflation gage) reading (At the very least I should have dollar cost averaged in as I believe equities, commodities, and TIPS have not reached a bottom yet.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:53 am
Another good Puplava:http://www.financialsense.com/Market/cpuplava/2008/1022.html
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:54 am
It seems like we have two more areas to unwind:1. about $15 Trillion in Credit Default Swaps (of NET EXPOSURE; much less than the 64 Trillion in notional exposure)2. several hundred hedge fundsThis should bring the S&P 500 down to say 500 maybe?
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:55 am
BTW,I believe that your referring to the left character of cieling function, which truncates the upside to any functional expression! How appropriate!! AHAHAHAHAHA
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 8:58 am
Art C says 8750 today before the end of the world comes on Monday, where we could get a six handle — I hope he is correct I put a small portion in IVV that has so far cost me more than a year’s worth of Starbucks.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:01 am
OR,Your humility inspires me. Sincerely. I’ll try to heed your words as I was lucky enough to go to cash within 3% of the market top. Lucky me, but I’ve been feeling the exact emotions that you just expressed.PKB
Miss Italy • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:02 am
Thank you Octavio for sharing both the rational and irrational part of your investing. I highly treasure your suggestions and will help me became a serious investor.
Octavio Richetta • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:06 am
I don’t work for ECRI. Here is the link to the little book:Beating the Business Cycle: How to Predict and Profit from Turning Points in the Economy, by Lakshman Achuthan and Anirvan Banerji, New York: Currency Doubleday, 2004http://www.businesscycle.com/resources/books/IMO, the most bang for your money (Around 20 bucks) and time invested reading it (it takes one morning to read) you will ever find.BTW, why Mohamed El-Erian’s book, When Markets Collide, got the prizes below beats me. I read the book and I found at most 4 pages to be useful (I will give you the page numbers when I go home. I am still working from an Internet cafe). In addition, it is very poorly written. I guess for people like me who knew this was coming since 2005 and hangs around the Professor’s website there is very little to learn from it. Perhaps, this was not the case for GS’ CEO and the folks at the FT. Any views from other readers? Am I going crazy?http://www.pimco.com/LeftNav/PIMCO+Spotlight/2008/Viewpoints+October+2008+El+Erian+Business+Book+Award.htm
Capone • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:10 am
thanks so much for this CNBC info for Art C, no TV here love to hear what they are talking about…
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:15 am
Greenspan on CNBC
dof • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:22 am
Medic: brave individualist that you think that you are — please listen before you speak.Ryskamp means you no harm.Grumpy curmudgeons ensure your continued existence and always will.My thoughts are always open to interpretation.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:24 am
Who should this be?
jomos • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:26 am
sp500 contracting triangle almost to point E @ approx. 940 of wave 4.Than wave 5 down to below 800 to complete this leg down with a counter trend rally for a month or two.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:28 am
I remember Gross calling for Dow 5000, I have lost a great deal of respect for him since the BS surrounding Fannie and Freddie – where he played both the role of Chicken Little (pre bailout) and the Big Bad Wolf (post bailout) e.g. Pimco made $7bn on that deal and now his company will be running the CPFF (Commercial Paper Funding Facility) program -
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:30 am
I got the gist of what you are saying but just a bit more info would be great for the non-technical types – thanks
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:33 am
No.The world is going crazy.
2cents • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:36 am
@ OuterBeltway,Yes things are different today, and yes the technology definitely increases the pace up or down, but I think the basic analysis is correct at the super macro level.Your attack using your point “a” is valid and may come to pass, but it will require an admission by the PTB that they have lost control and physical restraint is the only saving “grace”.As for your attack point “b”, I think the PTB are most concerned about the size and timeframe constraints that they see. Quite simply, the crisis may not be something that the world can actually “handle” with available resources. In other words conserve resources and only use them when absolutely necessary. Thus, it becomes critical that the PTB can read the decelerometer correctly!
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:38 am
jomos is talking about Elliott Wave theory that everything goes in 5 waves, so capitulation (intermediate term) should get a leg down to around 760 according to my estimates coming up shortly – likely by 31 Oct/2 Nov timeframe
2cents • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:43 am
@ AfA,You seem to have a penchant for finding the angle and doin the spin! You might consider getting a new day job in the US Congress. They live on spin.All in jest Afa! I appreciate your posts here, sending you to Congress would be wasting your talents!
Jason B • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:45 am
OK, so whats the long-term capitulation level?
StocksGoinGreen • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:46 am
BOOOMMMM!!!! UP 200 POINTS IN 6 SECONDS!!! WHAT JUST HAPPENED????
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:48 am
hard to say since I think what will happen is we do a long-term multi-year trading range in nominal terms BUT in real terms head lower and lower and lower…
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:50 am
Can someone explain if CDS is such a huge shoe waiting to drop, why Lehman’s $.5 trillion in CDS settled for a mere few billion?
2cents • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:54 am
This is serious!!It’s not that the Military is not trained in police powers, they are! The problem is that this gives the Defense Secretary and President a path to total control of the Nation State. Do we really want to live with the specter of a President being able to turn troops on the citizens?
StocksGoinGreen • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:58 am
PPT BABY!!! LOOK AT ‘ER GO!!! TO DA MOOM! RETAKE OF DOW 9000 ON THE WAY. PPT READS CHARTS TOO AND SAID “NO DOW 6300″ BOOMMMM!
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 9:59 am
NEW THREAD
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 10:01 am
It depends on your perspective how this played out. It is interesting that two hedgies blew yesterday – maybe a coincidence…Do you believe the ISDA:ISDA press release on Lehman settlementOr do you believe Capone of RGEmonitor:Lehman CDS Payout On October 21: $360bn or $6bn?- by Elisa Parisi-Capone]
StocksGoinGreen • October 23rd, 2008 at 10:02 am
DOW UP 400 POINTS OFF THIS MORNINGS LOW! MANIC MANIC MANIC
K in TX • October 23rd, 2008 at 10:36 am
Ah…the serenity of fatalism. Nothing to do but watch the show.
kilgores • October 23rd, 2008 at 10:44 am
dof:I do have faith in the legal system, but as with any form of faith, it is continually tested. No one who has faith has not also had doubts, and I am no exception. As an attorney, I have represented small clients in court against the governments of the United States and of the State of Florida, and against large corporate interests, and I have had occasion to prevail in such adversarial contests in reliance on the constitutions and laws of the United States and of the State of Florida. On the other hand, I have also seen corruption on a first-hand basis, and I am particularly cognizant of the pernicious influence of wealth and influence, particularly by large corporate interests, on the legislative and executive branches of government. The judiciary is only one branch of government, and it can’t be expected to correct all of society’s problems on its own.I’m not sure to exactly which of Mr. Ryskamp’s assertions you refer, and I’m not sure what you mean by “financial and political elitism.” I can tell you, however, that while concentrations of power and influence in politics and economics are as old as civilization itself, there is historical precedence for reigning in such imbalances. Unfortunately, it usually takes a catastrophic financial crisis to do so, because the only way to control effectively the influence of those who have too much money is to take it away from them, and that requires a mass revolt on the part of the citizenry through targeted tax policies.The best recent example may be the 1930s. In 1929 and in the early 1930s, there was — as now — tremendous disparity in the distribution of wealth in this country. Something like 70 percent of stock dividends went to only one percent of all Americans, and the top marginal tax rate for individual income taxes was around 24 percent, and the highest estate tax rate was about 20 percent. The corporate income tax rate in 1929 was less than 14 percent. More than 20 percent of the entire wealth of the United States was owned and controlled by the elite 0.1 percent of the population.By around 1946 or 1947, all that had changed. During its first term, the Roosevelt administration increased the highest marginal tax rate on individual income to 63 percent, and during its second term, that rate rose by another 16 percent to 79 percent. By the mid 1950s, the top marginal income tax rate for individuals was 91 percent, topping out at about 95 percent when Kennedy took office (at which time it began to go down). The top estate tax rate rose from its 1929 level of 20 percent to 77 percent. Similarly, the corporate income tax rate had increased to more than 45 percent by 1955. As a result of this tax-based redistribution, by the mid-1950s — in the span of about 25 to 40 years following the Crash and the onset of the Great Depression — that elite 0.1 percent only controlled about 10 percent of the nation’s wealth, or about half of what it had controlled before.The net effect of all this was to reduce the concentration of economic and political power in the hands of a few, and vest in more citizens the opportunity to share a greater portion of the economic and political pie. While the pre-tax incomes of the elite upper 0.1 of the population had declined to around 60 percent of what it had been in 1929, real median family income doubled, allowing the standard of living for the average American to rise. For the first time, many citizens were able to enjoy their own indoor plumbing, to own an automobile, and to have a telephone in their own homes.What we’ve seen over the last 30 or 35 years has been a gradual dismantling of this tax policy as income taxes and estate taxes have been cut, more so on the upper end of the income scale than the lower end, shifting the burden of taxation to the lower and middle classes. That’s why the real median income has been dropping overall during the past three decades, and why we have witnessed growing corruption in the halls of our federal and state governments.I’m all for free enterprise in concept, but in practice, when economic and political power become too concentrated in the hands of a few, the only way to bring things back into balance is through government tax policies, which can only be carried out with the sort of widespread popular support that comes from a devastating financial and economic crisis. I think we’re in for a change soon.SWK
kilgores • October 23rd, 2008 at 10:46 am
The President already has the power to federalize the national guard. I agree, however, that it would be quite dangerous to expand that power to include the use of the entire U.S. military.SWK
K in TX • October 23rd, 2008 at 10:49 am
The foundation was laid for this in October 2006.”In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President’s ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.Public Law 109-364, or the “John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007″ (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a “public emergency” and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to “suppress public disorder.”President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006. In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is precise; the term is “martial law.”http://www.towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/911/It is very serious. Bush essentially gave himself the right to declare martial law for any reason that he sees fit. This plus the “detention camps” paints a dark picture. Even if there is no “master plan” as such the fact that our government is taking such steps points to their expectation of some extreme emergency.KBR Awarded Homeland Security contract worth up to $385M. (HAL) (By Katherine Hunt)SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — KBR, the engineering and construction subsidiary of Halliburton Co, (HAL), said Tuesday it has been awarded a contingency contract from the Department of Homeland Security to supports its Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in the event of an emergency. The maximum total value of the contract is $385 million and consists of a 1-year base period with four 1-year options. KBR held the previous ICE contract from 2000 through 2005. The contract, which is effective immediately, provides for establishing temporary detention and processing capabilities to expand existing ICE Detention and Removal Operations Program facilities in the event of an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs, KBR said. The contract may also provide migrant detention support to other government organizations in the event of an immigration emergency, as well as the development of a plan to react to a national emergency, such as a natural disaster, the company said.
dof • October 23rd, 2008 at 11:38 am
In essence, given all its historic foibles and distractions, ultimately, the collective human spirit dictates law and policy.Thank-you for your eloquent response SWK. It restores my faith.
kilgores • October 23rd, 2008 at 3:03 pm
Happy to oblige.
SWK
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 6:01 pm
Good question. Good proposal. Good debate. Coulnt’t be better than that.
Guest • October 23rd, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Thanks for the reality check. Most Americans are responsible: all one has to do is look around. Otherwise, America would have been total chaos, many, many years ago.

















