How to prevent a financial crisis in Hungary that would lead to serious financial contagion in Emerging Europe
I recently spent a few days visiting Hungary, a country that is now at the center of financial pressures in emerging markets. In recent weeks the stock market has sharply fallen, interest rates have increased, the currency has weakened and financial institutions have suffered of shortages of liquidity. A fully fledged currency and financial crisis can still be avoided with appropriate and coherent policy actions but the financial pressures have intensified in the last week.
The macro, financial and policy weaknesses of Hungary – in many ways similar to those of many other countries in the Emerging Europe region – are not new; here at RGE we covered them as early as June 2006 in two analyses about vulnerabilities in Hungary and in Emerging Europe. But the global financial crisis has been the external trigger that has led now to a liquidity and credit crunch, the risk of a sudden stop and of a reversal of capital inflows.
The vulnerabilities of the economy include a large current account deficit, a still excessive fiscal deficit, a partially overvalued currency, serious maturity and currency mismatches in the financial system, the household sector and the corporate sector, low stock of foreign reserve and high level of short term foreign currency debt that is at risk of a roll-off. Mary Stokes, RGE’s analyst on Emerging Europe, has recently well analyzed and summarized these vulnerabilities:
Hungary is the latest hotspot in the ongoing global financial turmoil. On October 15, the currency plunged almost 7%, the biggest daily decline in five years and stocks tumbled almost 12%. Meanwhile, demand for Hungary’s government bonds dried up.
This turmoil comes at a time when Hungary is in recovery mode. In mid-2006, after years of extremely loose fiscal policy that resulted in major imbalances, Hungary implemented a fiscal austerity package, which improved the current account and pushed down the budget deficit (from a record 9.2% of GDP in 2006 to a projected 3.4% of GDP or lower this year).
So how did Hungary become the latest target in the global financial turmoil?
While the immediate trigger seems to be a liquidity squeeze prompted by the global financial turmoil, the country has a number of vulnerabilities that contributed to the recent Hungarian asset sell-off.
High Foreign Currency Lending
Foreign currency lending in Hungary has increased by leaps and bounds in recent years as shown in the graph below. While swiss franc and euro loans appeal to companies and households because of their lower interest rates, this type of lending is particularly risky because it leaves unhedged borrowers exposed to currency swings.
Domestic Banks: Heavy Reliance On Non-Deposit, Foreign Financing
While the rapid growth in foreign currency lending in Hungary is concerning, some of Hungary’s regional peers have similarly high levels. A key problem specific to Hungary is an exceptionally high ratio of foreign currency loans to foreign currency deposits.
Over 60% of total loans to businesses and households were in foreign currencies (primarily euro, Swiss franc), while foreign currency deposits accounted for just over 20% of total deposits, according to a Fitch report from January 2008. This, combined with Hungary’s high loan-to-deposit ratio of over 140%, suggests a heavy reliance on non-deposit foreign funding, which tends to be volatile especially in the context of the current global credit crunch.
Domestic Banks: Deteriorating Maturity Structure
According to a recent report from Hungary’s central bank, the maturity profile of foreign funding has deteriorated and the domestic banking sector must be prepared to face ‘sustained tight liquidity conditions.’ This deterioration in the maturity profile increases ‘roll-over risk’ – the risk that investors are unwilling to refinance the debt coming due – and is a common feature of financial crises.
Potential Spillover From Foreign Parent Banks
In a blog post back in April, I noted that the CEE area is clearly vulnerable to any financing issues experienced by the major foreign parent banks that dominate the region’s banking systems. That is, problems in the EU banking sector could potentially impact Hungary and other Eastern European economies and vice-versa. Given the growing concerns about the stability of the EU banking sector, this potential contagion channel is a vulnerability and important to watch. (See related spotlight issue: How Safe Is the EU Banking Sector? Watch High Leverage Ratios and Derivatives Exposure) (See this UniCredit report for details on which foreign banks operate in Hungary.)
Adverse Financing Composition Of Current Account Deficit
Hungary’s current account deficit is high, but nothing compared to the double-digit deficits in Bulgaria, Romania, and the Baltics. The key issue is its financing composition.
In 2007, Hungary’s current account corrected to 5% of GDP, down from 6.1% in 2006, and the gap is projected to be even lower this year. The problem is that net FDI covered just 20% of the gap in 2007, and debt-generating inflows financed the rest, according to Pasquale Diana of Morgan Stanley, who expects some improvement this year.
Reserves Coverage of Short-term Debt
Hungary’s short-term debt (18% of GDP) is roughly covered by net international reserves, according to the IMF. The build-up of short-term debt was a key vulnerability in the run-up to the Asian financial crisis in 1997 and the Russia crisis in 1998, among others. Hungary’s foreign exchange reserves totaled EUR17 billion at end-September (less than 3 months of imports, which is normally considered a critical level for FX reserves in terms of liquidity).
Budget Deficit and Government Debt Levels Highest in the Region
Notably, Hungary still suffers from twin deficits – the current account deficit mentioned above, as well as a budget deficit. Despite Hungary’s fiscal austerity measures, Willem Buiter still described Hungary as being in a ‘deep fiscal mess’ earlier this year. With public debt standing around 65% of GDP, Hungary is an outlier among its regional peers. Buiter says the public debt load will turn out to be unsustainable unless there is a major change in the political equilibrium.
Political Risk
As Edward Hugh notes in a recent blog post, there is considerable political risk in Hungary. The ruling Socialist Party now governs from a minority position after the Free Democrats pulled out of coalition in April 2008. Meanwhile, the government has become unpopular in the wake of the 2006 fiscal austerity package, making it difficult for the government to pursue a reform agenda
Growth Laggard
Hungary’s growth is lowest of any CEE country. Real GDP growth of 1.3% in 2007 was down from over 4.0% a year earlier, largely due to the fiscal austerity measures implemented in 2006.
However, at this point the crucial issue – beyond dissecting the macro, policy and financial vulnerabilities that have led to the recent financial pressures – is to figure out what are the possible policy actions that may restore confidence and prevent and currency and financial crisis. Such a crisis would be devastating not only for Hungary but also for the Emerging Europe region: if Hungary goes bust the risk of a domino effect – like the one that in 1997 led the East Asian crisis to spread from Thailand to Malaysia, Indonesia and Korea – would be significant as many of the Emerging Europe region economies share the same vulnerabilities as Hungary (and indeed significant financial pressures are already underway in Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey). A crisis in Hungary would lead to a crisis in a large part of Emerging Europe; so preventing such a crisis in Hungary is essential to prevent a broader regional financial crisis.
So what can be done to prevent such a crisis? There are several options on the table that, together, can lead to a coherent policy response that restores confidence and credibility. Let us discuss next in some detail such options…
First of all, a meaningful further reduction in the fiscal deficit is essential as large fiscal deficits have been at the center of concerns by international and domestic investors. The current government has already reduced the fiscal deficit from about 9% of GDP in 2006 to a level slightly above 3% this year. But this fiscal adjustment is not sufficient given the current confidence crisis. The government is now planning to revise the fiscal deficit for 2009 to 2.9% from the originally planned 3.2% but a somewhat stronger fiscal adjustment – towards a 2.5% deficit together with commitments to further structural fiscal consolidation – would help to boost further investors’ confidence. Of course, over the medium term, the bloated public sector should shrink, with sharp spending cuts allowing cuts in tax rates that are now excessive. But, in the short term and in a period of a crisis, postponing tax cuts and achieving some reduction in spending is more important as it will lead to a confidence-boosting reduction of the fiscal deficit.
Second, the government has now access to 5 billion euros that were made available by the ECB in a swap operation. The willingness of the ECB to “bail out” a country that is not yet member of the Eurozone is quite significant and signals the concerns that EMU members now have about the disruptive effects of a crisis in Hungary. Also, the ECB liquidity support, unlike IMF conditionality loans, does not come with any attached string. The additional issues that the ECB action has caused are however important: if 5 billion is not enough if the financial pressures intensify would the ECB lend more? Will the ECB do similar swaps with other Emerging Europe economies that are likely candidates – in the next few year – for EMU membership? Also should Hungary now use this additional international liquidity to prevent a further depreciation of its currency or should it save this additional ammunition in case things get worse?
Third, Hungary may want to consider intervening in the forex market to inflict pain on “speculators” that are shorting the currency. This strategy is risky if aggressive intervention fails to stem the speculation and fails to reverse the fall in the currency value. Also sterilized intervention may not be very effective as it would not increase domestic short term interest rates and thus make more costly to short the currency. While unsterilized intervention may be more effective but it would come at the cost of a sharp increase in short rates. And if unsterilized intervention is performed the authorities may achieve the same increase in domestic interest rates through domestic open market operations that don’t require the use of precious foreign currency reserves.
Fourth, the authorities can try to use an interest rate defense of the currency (that is in principle equivalent to an unsterilized forex intervention). This is the approach taken this past week by Romania where overnight and seven day rates have spiked to over 40%. This approach is risky: interest rate defense of a currency under pressure is costly as a weak economy cannot take – for too long – such a sharp increase in real interest rates. Unless such interest rate defense is temporary and able to break the back of speculation in a short period of time (a couple of weeks) it becomes very expensive (leading to the risk of a severe economic contraction and a worsening fiscal balance) and it loses its credibility: if the currency is fundamentally overvalued that defense fails (as in the UK, Italy and Sweden in 1992 and in Turkey in 2001) as investors realize that such defense cannot last too long.
Fifth, the authorities may want to seek an IMF program as they have signaled in the past week. There is intense debate in Hungary on whether such an IMF program would boost confidence or not. Some worry that an IMF program would be a stigma for the country as only countries in serious trouble and crisis would apply for such a program. There is also some concern that the IMF botched its conditionality in previous emerging market crisis episodes. But an IMF program may rather boost confidence and provide much needed foreign currency liquidity necessary to stem speculative pressures. The IMF appears to have learned from some of its previous mistakes and more willing to disburse in short order (and with fewer strings attached) international liquidity to countries that are deemed – like Hungary – to be illiquid but solvent. Also in many previous emerging market crisis the IMF support arrived only after a full blown crisis had erupted. In this case, instead, the liquidity support may come early and before the crisis has really erupted. So while some in Hungary argue that an IMF plan should be only a last resort policy there are good arguments in favor of an early IMF financial support rather than waiting to see if things get much worse. If the country waits too long that IMF support may indeed signal stigma and desperation. Ideally the country should have asked for an early disbursement IMF program in conjunction with its rapid receipt of the ECB support. While the public communication of the authorities approaching the IMF was partially botched this past week there is still time to repair the damage and seek a rapid – and short-in-conditionality – IMF liquidity support.
Sixth, the government may have to consider whether a soft bail in of foreign investors, especially foreign banks operating in Hungary, is necessary and desirable. About 85% of the banking system in Hungary is foreign owned, mostly Italian, German and Austrian banks. There is now a risk that such foreign banks may reduce their exposure to their Hungarian subsidiaries and – in an extreme crisis situation – even let such subsidiaries go bust (as some US banks did in Argentina in 2001) if that is necessary to save their home country operation. But so far the Hungarian subsidiaries of such foreign banks have been quite profitable even if – of course – the foreign currency borrowing of the household sector and corporate sector (in swiss francs, euros and more recently yen) has become excessive and dangerous. The maturity of the cross border financing of this foreign currency lending by banks has also shortened over the last year as longer term financing has become more scarce and expensive. Since Hungarian operations of foreign banks are profitable it should not be in their interest to roll-off their exposure to Hungary. On the other hand many European banks have their own domestic stresses given the financial turmoil in the eurozone and their need to deleverage and reduce risk exposure is leading to destabilizing pro-cyclical behavior towards their Emerging Europe subsidiaries (this pro-cyclicality of the credit behavior of foreign banks in emerging markets is a well known phenomenon in the empirical academic literature on this subject).
So hopefully foreign banks operating in Hungary will maintain their cross-border exposure to Hungarian cross-border operations and will not sharply cut off the provision of new credit to the real economy (a new credit that is rapidly shrinking). But things get sourer and an incipient financial crisis looks like imminent a bail-in of foreign banks operating in Hungary may become necessary to prevent a sharp and destructive roll-off of the cross border exposure. Such bail-in of cross border interbank exposure took a more coercive form in the 1997 Korean crisis and a less coercive (voluntary subject to IMF monitoring) form in the 1999 Brazil and 2001 Turkey episodes. But if all else fails and international liquidity support (from ECB and/or IMF) is not sufficient to stop a cross border run on the country’s short-term liabilities (especially those of the banking system) such soft or coercive bail-in of foreign banks may become necessary to avoid a more destructive crisis.
Hopefully such bail-in will not be necessary or it will take a soft form if necessary but such policy option may need to be considered in due time. In the short run the authorities may want to engage foreign banks – and use light-touch moral suasion – to convince them to stay in rather than run. After all, this crisis of confidence has self-fulfilling elements: if a bank stays in and all the other run, the losses for those who don’t roll off their claims would be severe; thus, there is an incentive for every player to rush to the exit in this non-cooperative Nash game. It is thus the role of the policy authorities to prevent this destructive rush to the exits outcome if the run does start to occur. Thus, for the time being using moral suasion to convince foreign banks to maintain exposure and continue cautious lending may be enough; but if a generalized run driven by panic were to occur more robust and possibly coercive forms of bail-in will have to be considered.
In conclusion, while the situation is dire a full blown crisis can still be prevented in Hungary and in other countries in the region. But rapid and coherent policy action is essential to restore investors’ confidence and prevent a destructive currency and financial crisis. One should hope that the political forces – government and opposition – will stop bickering in public about what the right policy response should be and realize that the times are dangerous and further political uncertainty leads to policy uncertainty that does not boost confidence for nervous and trigger happy investors. Appropriate policy action together with the provision of international liquidity can still prevent a crisis that would have destructive effects on Hungary and most of the Emerging Europe region.
254 Responses to “How to prevent a financial crisis in Hungary that would lead to serious financial contagion in Emerging Europe”
Anonymous • October 21st, 2008 at 5:54 am
hi
Pancho • October 21st, 2008 at 6:52 am
I “second” you…
Michel • October 21st, 2008 at 6:54 am
What about an IMF&ECB joint action in sustaining these fragile european countries by huge lending offers ?It’s been demonstrated in the previous phase of the crisis in western europe and the US, thanks to Gordon Brown, that a strong public guarantee limits the market impact and thus eases the resolution of the financial problem in all its dimensions, including the actual need to spend acutal money in aid.
BrazilianGuy • October 21st, 2008 at 7:24 am
Money generates debt, that generates loans, that generates inflation, and to hinder that we need to print more money that generates more debt, join this with interest rates and you have an atomic bomb, hungary is as dead as US is.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 7:46 am
Libor coninues its southward journey as TED narrows and shares in banknote companies soar. Bernanke has broken with tradition and declared his defacto support for Obama and the necessity for huge stimulus. Perhaps there is a movement afoot to nationalize the equity markets – meanwhile over at Merrill, newly appointed Peter Kraus will be collecting as much as $25 million in severance after 7 weeks on the job… nice LIBOR TED Spread
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 7:56 am
What you doing saving hungary? Save us!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 7:59 am
Money is debt, and its printing out of thin air.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 8:00 am
We’re hungry.
London Banker • October 21st, 2008 at 8:06 am
@ AllI’ve only got a minute to check in here, so can’t do justice to the Professor’s post above. I have hoped that Eastern European growth would cushion the EU in the coming years, but perhaps I was over-optimistic.Rich H/Miss America will be guest-blogging for me on the London Banker page on Friday, so be sure to check in then and give him some support and encouragement. As many long term commenters here will appreciate, Rich was has a tremendous talent for reading the cash flows of the investment industry and translating that into market timing. He understands the implications of the liquidity facilities being innovated by the Fed and Paulson, and his perspective on how events will play out will be well worth the read.I will be back the following Friday, with many adventures and some new perspective to share.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 8:16 am
Have some goulash.
oller • October 21st, 2008 at 8:40 am
Satyajit Das points out an erroneous assumption that the hedge funds hedged their CDS exposure. They neededto get the upfront premium to pad their earnings fromtheir pessimal investment returns. Hedge funds have substantial cds exposure and it is not hedged. If they can’t pay, the counterparty pays!A Warning Sign From LehmanCDS Settlement Offers Window Into More Banking ProblemsOctober 20, 2008(CBS) CBS News Investigative Unit’s Kim Lengle wrote this story for CBSNews.com.Worries are mounting that some banks and hedge funds that sold credit default swaps (CDS) on Lehman Brothers’ debt might not have enough cash to make the big payouts they promised.The settlement date is tomorrow, Tuesday, October 21 which means that a transfer of cash must be completed. That’s when CDS, which guarantee to compensate trading partners for losses on Lehman bonds, need to be paid out.Credit analysts predict some firms could take a huge financial hit amounting to billions of dollars in combined losses.“I believe it was a tragic error for the Fed to allow Lehman to go under,” Weil, Gotshal & Manges Senior Partner Harvey Miller told CBS News. Miller who is currently overseeing the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy added, “It’s not a contained situation.”The concern is whether the paying side of the swap will be able to make their payments. Swap sellers are required to make up the difference on the price of the debt if a company goes bankrupt. Because the price of the Lehman debt was set at 8.625 cents, it means Some of the biggest players on Wall Street will now have to pay 91-cents-on-the-dollar for those contracts, if they can afford to.If the sellers of the swaps can’t afford to pay up, the counterparty who bought the so-called protection will be forced to take the losses as well.Outstanding Lehman Brothers’ CDS have an estimated value of $400 billion.No one knows just how many CDS have been traded or whose balance sheet they are on because the market for these swaps is unregulated. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association recently estimated the market at $54.6 trillion. But since there is no central clearinghouse, trade volume can’t be tracked and publicly posted.The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) put out a press release last week saying that worries about Lehman swaps are overblown. DTCC, which runs its own voluntary trade registry, says outstanding CDS only total $6 billion.“That’s the sunny side of the street,” said Satyajit Das, a former derivatives trader and author of Traders, Guns & Money: Knowns and Unknowns in the Dazzling World of Derivatives.Das says the $6 billion figure assumes that all of the sellers took out additional investments to effectively cancel out the risk they had with Lehman but believes this is not the case, particularly with hedge funds.The CDS market doesn’t require financial firms to keep capital in reserve in case they have to pay off their bets.Das says he thinks there will be some problems tomorrow in terms of the payout but says this is the first sign of just how deep the CDS problem could run. “This is a test for the market, but there will be a lot more to come,” said Das.By Kim Lengle© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yossarian21 • October 21st, 2008 at 8:48 am
The best option that Hungary has is to let its currency depreciate and talk to it’s debtor on loan renegotiation or just default – the argument that default would have serious long term consequnece for Hungary’s future attractivness is trivial at the moment.The 6 options that Nourini cites are not actually an option given the ucrrent condiotions:1.> Fiscal adjustment – cannot be achieved overnight and the entailing signal of such plan to the investors in this market would fall on deaf ears2.> ECB and IMF just can’t keep supporting an unsustainable state of affairs that has been well described in teh article – esp. the fact that the C/S deficit is huge and is mostly funded by fast money3.> Protecting the HUF – The currency speculators have much deeper pockets than emerging countries; the financial history of LatAm and SE-Asian countires in previous crisis provides ample empirical evidence4.> IR intervention – ineffective for the same reasons as # 3.> and also, would have long term ngative effect on growth prospects5.> IMF program – IMF would screw Hungray the same way it has screwed LatAm and SE-Asia in previous crisis – forcing pro-cyclical tightening which plays havoc with long term growth rather than supporting the country in crisis with anti-cyclical policies6.> Bail out – That is a good option
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 8:58 am
Anonymous • October 21st, 2008 at 9:07 am
Is Nouriel done with USA?
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 9:12 am
Screw Hungary!! The US economy has fallen off a cliff! My 3rd qtr GDP est now stands at -4.52% with data through September!!!The Chicago Fed National Activity Index was −2.57 in September, down from −1.61 in August. Most of the index’s decline in September was driven by the steep drop in industrial production, as reflected in the contribution of the production and income category of indicators. However, all four broad categories of indicators made negative contributions to the index in September.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:14 am
Opening gap closed-sink this pig!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:15 am
any word on the Lehman CDS settlements?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:17 am
Canada at a regularly scheduled meeting cut by 25bps to 2.25 – This follows a half point cut two weeks ago. Many had expected another half point reduction – lower commodities and a US downturn have brought the country close to recession. Further rate cuts were hinted at. Bank of Canada cuts key rate by 25 basis points Fed announces yet another facility (only $600 bn)to support money markets and will be run by JP Morgan. It would seem that the American rush towards socialism will include a new generation of financial Oligarchs. More Government Help Is it just me or is this beginning to look like there’s something in the water in Washington Bank of Canada cuts key rate by 25 basis points
StockGoinGreen • October 21st, 2008 at 9:18 am
SINK WHAT PIG!! GOIN GREEN BABY! DOW CLOSE 9278 TODAY!!
StocksGoinGreen • October 21st, 2008 at 9:19 am
OOOPS!! I MEAN 9728!!! +400 BABY!
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 9:21 am
I’m Hungarian. I do not think you have to ignore (like JimmyTheBanker) what’s happening in Hungary. Hungary is a small country (10 million), but in the middle of Europe.You remember the Great Depression? The first failed bank was Creditanstalt located in Austria. Some Austrian banks have subsidiaries in Hungary. If one of them will fail then I’m sure the domino effect will start. And not only in Eastern Europe, Austria will follow etc…So, this is a dangerous situation for all of us.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:22 am
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 9:23 am
However the people in Hungary are relaxed. Business as usual today. 99% percent can not imagine a default of the country.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:24 am
I’m glad you caught your own mistake – you don’t work for the PPT do you?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:27 am
just like Iceland but with far more serious consequences – the post above is exactly right, this is a dangerous situation for all of us.
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 9:29 am
If there is going to be a second stimulous and they REALLY want the funds to be spent, my idea is instead of issuing checks, they issue gift cards good only for consumption in US stores. You can’t save them, you can’t pay bills with them, only consume something. Then, roughly 90% of the $ amount would make it into the economy.
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 9:32 am
Nouriel,I’m not an expert, but I think, what we need is the same what ECB have got from the FED: the swap line. We need a swap line to ECB EUR/HUF. Perhaps more then 5 mrd EUR as of today. It is not really a huge number for a country. If the eurozone, Japan, Switzerland, GB) get’s it from the FED, then we should get it from the ECB.I’m not sure our problem is much bigger than Western Europe has. What would Switzerland do without a USD swap line? They would be in a same danger as we are.How do you see?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:34 am
That’s the question of the day. What’s the amount – isn’t it around $400-$500 billion due by Tues or Wed of this week.PeteCA
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 9:39 am
I do not really like the comparison with Iceland.1. Non of the Hungarian banks ever invested in any US assets2. We have 65% of debt (GDP), Iceland have much more. I do not know the exact figures, but most of them is in our currency (forint HUF).So, we are in a much better shape as Iceland was.Hungary will not default in a short term, I’m sure.
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 9:51 am
tg-I was being sarcastic-sorry to come across the way I did. I have to remember this blog is international! No disrespect meant.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:56 am
10:46 a.m.[C] Goldman Sachs tells clients to sell Citigroup10:46 a.m.[C] Goldman puts Citi on “conviction sell” list
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 9:58 am
10:57 a.m.S&P says S&P 500 payout decrease worst since 195810:57 a.m. S&P expects S&P 500 dividend payout to fall 10% in 4th qtr
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:00 am
If we create swap lines for all currencies and countries for U.S. dollars, wouldn’t we suck up all foreign currencies and eliminate all talk of baskets of currencies or regional currencies. We would have only one, in the form of U.S. dollar domination. The neocons would be proud.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:02 am
sorry I was only trying to point out that the citizens of Iceland, like those in Hungary could not have imagined a default – I realize that the situations are quite different, though the consequences with Hungary could be far more dire
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:04 am
@ John Ryskamp (previous thread): Now we are shifting from idiotic “bailout” schemes to equally idiotic “stimulus” schemes. The decline of the Baltic Dry points to a catastrophic decline in economic activity, which no stimulus package on earth will turn aside…”The proof is in the pudding…er, the shipping.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:10 am
Now it is red as a soviet
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:17 am
What is a “PPT?” Is it a company, or corporation, or a multinational thingy? Does it pay good money to its employees? If so, how to apply for a job?
Michael Khor • October 21st, 2008 at 10:25 am
Contrary to the mass media cheering on the bank bailout, the following is the perspective by Willem Buiter of FT.The US tax payer is indeed getting a lousy deal for his $125 bn capital injectionUwe Reinhardt is absolutely correct. The US tax payer is getting a terrible return on the $125bn worth of capital that was injected on his behalf by US Treasury Secretary Paulson into the nine largest US banks. This is surprising to me, because the complete or partial nationalisations of a number of US financial behemoths earlier in the year represented rather better value for money for the tax payer.The nationalisation of Fannie, Freddie, AIG and pieces of the nine largest US banks (with more to come) was necessary to prevent a complete collapse of the house of cards we used to know as the American financial system.Unfortunately, Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson’s injection of $125 billion into the nine banks (out of a total capital injection budget provisionally set at $250bn (but bound to rise to probably around twice that amount), carved out of the $700 bn made available (in tranches) by the 2008 Economic Stability Emergency Act, was almost a free gift to these banks. In this it was different from the case of AIG, where the Fed and the Treasury imposed rather tough terms on the shareholders and obtained pretty favourable terms for the US tax payer generally. It was also unlike the case of Fannie and Freddie, where the old shareholders are likely not to recover anything.In the case of the Fortunate Nine, the injection of capital is through (non-voting) preference shares yielding a ridiculously low interest rate (5 percent as opposed to the 10 percent obtained by Warren Buffett for his capital injectcion into Goldman Sachs). Without voting shares, the government has no voice in the running of these banks. It also has no seats on their boards. By contrast, in the Netherlands, the injection of €10bn worth of subordinated debt into ING bank comes with a price tag that includes two government directors on the board and a government veto over all strategic decisions by the bank.In addition, in the the case of the Fortunate Nine, there are no attractively valued warrants (options to convert, at some future time, the preference shares into ordinary shares at a set price or at a price determined by some known formula). Quite the opposite, the preference shares purchased by the US state, can be repurchased after three years, at the banks’ discretion, on terms that are highly attractive to the banks. The US tax payer is not only getting a lousy deal compared to private US investors like Buffett, (s)he is also doing much worse than the British tax payer in the UK version of Paulson’s capital injection (£37 bn so far out of provisional budget of £50bn). The UK preference shares have a 12 percent yield and come with government-appointed board members.Even in the cases of AIG, Fannie and Freddie, unsecured senior creditors did not have to take an up-front haircut. Worse than that, even holders of junior debt and subordinated debt could come out of this exercise whole. There were no up-front haircuts, charges or mandatory debt-to-equity conversions.That, I would argue, is scandalous, both from a fairness perspective and from the point of view of the moral hazard this creates, by boosting the incentives for future reckless lending to elephantesquely large financial enterprises. Unless not only the existing shareholders of the banks benefiting from these capital injections but also the holders of the banks’ unsecured debt (junior and senior) and all other creditors of the bank (with the possible exception of retail depositors up to some appropriate limit) are made to pay a painful penalty for investing in excessively risky if not outright dodgy ventures, we are laying the foundations of the next systemic crisis, even as we are struggling to escape from the current one.Link to Uwe Reinhardt’s “Churchill Dictum”:http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2008/10/churchill%e2%80%99s-dictum/
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:30 am
This reminds me of a never ending Monopoly Game, It’s time to reset the board and start over, however the central bankers and top players don’t want to stop playing. So they keep printing out more monopoly money to hand out to all the losers in hopes that new money will keep the game going. This is going to get more ridiculous by the day, to keep this game going the world will have to create another board much larger than the individual boards that we have now. To keep the Fiat money system going on a world scale the board builders will need digital units of value instead of paper. They will need to outlaw private ownership of Gold and destroy the currency value of other metals. World tax system, world police, Digital credits only please. A million points of light, do you see another option?
devils advocate • October 21st, 2008 at 10:36 am
marc faber says2007 = 1929 gloom and doom but no boom!————-george soros basically wrote the same equation out in his latest book————-jim rogers (who used to work for george soros) agrees with the equation————-nouriel roubini says that it will be very difficult for the Authorities to prevent the equation coming true————I say that with the world printing $$$$$$ all over to prevent the equation/Depressionat best, people will believe $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ isn’t worth anything unless it is backed by real things, such as oil, gold, foods etc.
Yves. • October 21st, 2008 at 10:41 am
I wonder if one solution for Hungary could be to accelerate its accession to the euro. The fiscal effort would be balanced by a reduction in interest rates.
devils advocate • October 21st, 2008 at 10:41 am
I appreciate your concern about too much paper $$$$$$$$$$$people around the world have no confidence in the banks, the stock markets, the govtsand not even in $$$$$$$$$$———-perhaps, the way central banks can instill confidence enough, so people will spend again,is to back the paper with more than more paper $$$$$$ but with gold, oil, foods?
Anonymous • October 21st, 2008 at 10:44 am
On Bloomberg site. Argentina to nationalize all private pensions in order to stave off default on debt. Argentine stock market down 8%.
Dan • October 21st, 2008 at 10:48 am
Is Octavio around to give some local prospective?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:48 am
And it will help the EEM economies as well, given the origin of the products in those stores.Some may argue, however, that what the American public really needs is a lesson in frugality and personal financial responsibility. Another piece of plastic to replace their tapped out credit cards might not be the best tonic
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:52 am
A perpetual monopoly game – brilliant analogy even to the point of the get out of jail free card, which I am sure will be used in the coming months.
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 10:53 am
Guest, I couldn’t agree more! US citizens have lived well beyond their means for a decase now and all that supply of credit is now gone. That is what politicians fail to realize, personal balance sheets should be dowgraded to BBB in the US and no bank is going to just give away money anymore. Japan showed us that you can lower rates to 0%, but you still can’t force bnaks to lend nor people to borrow…
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 10:56 am
It is funny, but it seems that global socialism is the near victor after all these years of strife to promote democracy and free markets…
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:59 am
Furthermore, some of these banks have now turned around and said that they may use Paulson’s cash injection to go on a buying spree and look for takeovers. Doesn’t sound to me like these banks were quite as desperate (financially) as the Gov’t made out. Looks a lot more like they gamed the system, so they could swallow up their competition. Why is the taxpayer funding something like this???PeteCA
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:00 am
Austrian banks are very strong in south eastern Europe. I saw many branches of the Raiffeisenbank and Austrian Postbank in Bulgaria, and I remember the Austrian Sparkasse was active in the Czech Republic already more than ten years ago. So if Eastern Europe sees a depression, Austria will suffer, too. And the rest of Europe as well. And this will of course affect the USA, Asia, and Africa, which again will take down Australia and New Zealand and so on. So yes, we should take Hungary very seriously.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:02 am
Just wait till the shoe drops on business loansGlobe and Mailby DEREK DeCLOETOctober 21, 2008Henry Paulson said it with the confidence of … well, of a man who used to run Goldman Sachs. His scheme to pump a quarter of a trillion dollars into America’s banks “is an investment, not an expenditure, and there is no reason to expect this program will cost taxpayers anything.”This goes to show what an Alice-in-Wonderland place the market has become. Private investors, whose sole reason for owning stocks is to make money, have been losing it like it’s 1931 again. The U.S. government, whose sole reason for buying bank shares is not to make money but to make credit easier, could break even, or even turn a small profit. Or so the Treasury Secretary says.If nothing else, it proves the man has learned from his earlier mistakes. No more labelling it a “bailout” and getting the Joe Six-Packs riled up. Let’s focus on the positives, shall we? This is now a potential money-maker, or at the very least, not a money-loser. It’s smart messaging.Why isn’t the stock market buying what Mr. Paulson … continue reading
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:06 am
PPT saves 9000 on the Dow! WOW! Were you watching your trading screen, wall of buyers lined up for the save…lets see if they have any amo left…
Anonymous • October 21st, 2008 at 11:18 am
Off topic but thought its funny:http://gawker.com/5063337/the-secret-pleasures-of-dr-doom
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:18 am
-4.52%?No worries. The administration will likely declare that it is “opposite day” and seasonally adjust that to +4.52%You will hear the rest in the news, the GDP has grown again etc etc
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:20 am
why not just create swap lines all over the planet?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:22 am
Double bottom now in place, rally time
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:25 am
PPT!PPT!PPT!PPT!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:29 am
No problem.Despite of what I wrote before, I’m fearful. Nobody knows what will happen.However if Hungary fails, it will have severe consequences to the whole region.
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 11:34 am
Nobody speaks about a well known conspiracy theory, about the world currency.These swap lines pointing to this direction.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:37 am
I would be very interested in the two of you comparing and contrasting your differing opinions regarding how events will play out, the goal being to help solidify your positions and likely outcomes for our future. I would for one, would like to hear the two of you communicate to each other so as to help me form my own opinions. MA, when you post on Friday, can you acknowledging LB’s recent postings so we know you have read his latest?All the best to both of you!hlowe
Jason B • October 21st, 2008 at 11:45 am
Cut payroll taxes = money in wage earner’s wallets at their next paycheck
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:47 am
@Yossarian: “IMF program – IMF would screw Hungray the same way it has screwed LatAm and SE-Asia in previous crisis – forcing pro-cyclical tightening which plays havoc with long term growth rather than supporting the country in crisis with anti-cyclical policies.”Yes, the IMF is handmaiden to the new international monetary regime, the intellectual inspiration of John Maynard Keynes.Here’s my take on Hugh Hendry of Eclectica Asset Management from the video link on the previous thread, which includes his take on Hungary:Hendry said regarding Iceland: “Sadly, bureaucrats and elite business leaders have destroyed that country for the time being.”Hendry also said that Eastern Europe was in disequilibrium, worse than the disequilibrium of the Asian economies in the 1990s. Countries on a fixed peg are going to be in trouble, he said. The situation in Latvia, he said, is unsustainable. (Guest Note: “Latvia’s inflation is eroding the competitiveness of the country’s’ exports, inflation largely driven by growth in wages and producer-prices [correct me if this IMF assessment is wrong, Yossarian].) In Hungary, Hendry said that 90 percent of all housing mortgages now are either in the yen or the Swiss franc.“You can game the system, but you can’t beat it,” Hendry said.He believes that it will be 25 years, perhaps 45, before US markets see new highs established in the banking sector, similar to the time it took the 1932 banking system collapse to resolve itself.We’re talking about depression, he said. You don’t own stocks, you own bonds. If the perma bulls admitted how serious it is, their clients would pull all the money.Hendry said that if the Fed reduces the feds fund rates down to 50 or 25 basis points, the rate would stay there for three years. After that we’ll get commodity inflationAccording to Hendry: “Deflation today; inflation five to ten years in the future… We’re talking about depression: not about return on capital but return of capital.http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.asxx?clip=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/vJRGEwtqBFQM.asf&vCat=/adviser&RND=563834050
JohnRyskamp • October 21st, 2008 at 11:51 am
NOuriel has lost his mind. EVERYTHING in his opinion has the risk of leading to “serious financial contagion.” As if finance isn’t already contaminated. Why is he simply advocating that governments bankrupt themselves in order to pay off theft? Hungary is an example of PURE CORRUPTION. It is corrupt from top to bottom. And now he is prescribing austerity+bailout. This is simply privatizing gains and socializing losses.All the nonsense he has put forward to “stabilize” the “financial system” hasn’t done a thing. Why not? Because ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IS DECLINING. Why can’t this little technorobot keep his eyes on the facts? Nothing he has suggested has done, or will do, anything to increase economic activity. Nothing. Not in the long term, not in the short term–never. He is simply a Goldman mole. Disgusting.Now comes this: are we also supposed to bail out the mutual funds industry, because if we don’t, it poses a “systemic risk?” Nouriel is junk, garbage. When everything is systemic risk, then nothing is systemic risk.Oh and by the way, Baltic Dry is still a disaster area.Oct. 21 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve will provide up to $540 billion in loans to help relieve pressure on money- market mutual funds beset by redemptions.“Short-term debt markets have been under considerable strain in recent weeks” as it got tougher for funds to meet withdrawal requests, the Fed said in a statement in Washington. About $500 billion has flowed out of prime money-market funds since August, a Fed official said.The initiative is the third government effort to aid money- market funds, which in stable times are a key source of financing for banks and companies. The exodus of investors, sparked by losses from the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. bankruptcy, contributed to the freezing of credit that threatens to tip the economy into a prolonged recession.“The problem was much worse than we thought,” Jim Bianco, president of Chicago-based Bianco Research LLC, said in a Bloomberg Television interview. Policy makers are trying to prevent “Great Depression II” by stemming the financial industry’s contraction, he said.JPMorgan Chase & Co. will run five special units that will buy up to $600 billion of certificates of deposit, bank notes and commercial paper with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less. The Fed will provide up to $540 billion, with the remaining $60 billion coming from commercial paper issued by the five units to the money-market funds selling their assets, central bank officials told reporters on a conference call.Backstop ProgramThe new program is called the Money Market Investor Funding Facility, and officials said it’s intended as a backstop for money-market mutual funds to use as needed to meet redemptions.Today’s action shows that two programs set up last month by the Fed and U.S. Treasury to help money-market funds haven’t stabilized the industry. A Fed official told reporters today that the funds don’t have much of a liquidity buffer remaining.Last month, the Fed agreed to give emergency loans to banks so they can buy commercial paper from money-market funds. There was $122.8 billion of such loans outstanding as of Oct. 15. The Treasury separately used a $50 billion emergency pool to offer money funds guarantees against losses.“In terms of the redemptions money-market funds are seeing, and hedge funds as well, any of these moves by the Fed are going to help,” Mike Holland, chairman and founder of Holland & Co. LLC in New York, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. He predicted redemptions will ease.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:52 am
is this an announcement or a request?
Anonymous • October 21st, 2008 at 11:56 am
Any idea how to make money from the misery of Eastern european countries like Hungary? Any short plays? or is it too late?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:56 am
Relaxed? Does this look relaxed to you? (It is Steve Ballmer of Microsoft getting egged in Hungary).
Jason B • October 21st, 2008 at 11:57 am
This is what I see between the elections and next summer:Treasury auctions have few foreign biddersFed prints money to buy treasuriesInflation in fungible commodities, as creditor countries divest from dollars, and are willing to exchange dollars for essentials.Dollar selloff gains steam. Gold, oil etc price rises as US interest rates also rise.Foreign and domestic dollar holders try to get anything of value for their dollarsHyperinflationDollar run and crash. US bank runs, bank holidays, oil shortages and rationing, etc.This makes me sad. Please tell me how it is flawed.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:58 am
WOW! Third save at 31.96 on the SSO! Someone does not want this thing to fall apart today!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:06 pm
wow, so Fed prints money to buy treasuries because no one else will?
Frankly Alarmed • October 21st, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Hoping one or both of you might comment on the LEAP 2020 forecast of US dollar default in summer 2009:In this 28th edition of the GEAB, LEAP/E2020 has decided to launch a new global systemic crisis alert. Indeed our researchers anticipate that, before next summer 2009, the US government will default and be prevented from paying back its creditors (holders of US Treasury Bonds, of Fanny May and Freddy Mac shares, etc.). Of course such a bankruptcy will provoke some very negative outcome for all USD-denominated asset holders. According to our team, the period that will then begin should be conducive to the setting up of a « new Dollar » to remedy the problem of default and of induced massive capital drain from the US. The process will result from the following five factors studied in detail further in this GEAB:• The recent upward trend of the US Dollar is a direct and temporary consequence of the collapse of stock markets• Thanks to its recent « political baptism », the Euro becomes a credible « safe haven » value and therefore provides a « crisis » alternative to the US dollar• The US public debt is now swelling uncontrollably• The ongoing collapse of US real economy prevents from finding an alternative solution to the country’s defaulting• « Strong inflation or hyper-inflation in the US in 2009? », that is the only question.http://www.leap2020.eu/GEAB-N-28-is-available%21-Global-systemic-crisis-Alert-Summer-2009-The-US-government-defaults-on-its-debt_a2250.html
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Rally underway!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:08 pm
WOW!!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:08 pm
“ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IS DECLINING”That I believe. But it will not be visible in the official GDP numbers;-)
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:12 pm
and by the way, this is the real reason why the US government needs to keep pumping money to the financial institution: the US economy is no longer sustaining those institutions.
Mark • October 21st, 2008 at 12:12 pm
“I believe it was a tragic error for the Fed to allow Lehman to go under,”Oh, and we should toss this bomb directly on the masses rather than allowing these folks to eat their own mistake? Sorry, but this is a painful lesson to these folks that they should never again contemplate such bad practices!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:18 pm
“They” will close this green today, It jsut feels that way doesn’t it…kinda creepy…
Mark • October 21st, 2008 at 12:21 pm
= greater government debt, which means print more money, that or dump the debt in the laps of our future generations (though the later won’t work because the interest on this debt has to be paid and there will be less and less people willing or able to chance it; the same outcome could be said for printing more money).
UKNOWWHO • October 21st, 2008 at 12:22 pm
RUN FOREST RUN!!! GOIN GREEN BABY!!
jomos • October 21st, 2008 at 12:23 pm
This is a contrarian (sp?) signal that the worst is yet to come when “business as usual” consensus is prevalent on the street.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:32 pm
what about if everyone just buys 10-year Treasuries to get the 2% yield in a depression – better than nothing and everything else is losing value?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:37 pm
“There can be no more iniquitous alliance than to have the politicians at the service of the bankers, unless perhaps it is to have the military at the service of the bankers too.”London Banker’s Jeffersonian words over the weekend still ring in my ears like a rifle shot in the middle of the night.As Americans, the danger we face is far more critical than financial collapse. Here, said Hamilton, the people rule. But after the years of stealing, cheating, war making, currency corruption and lying, all that the people have been able to manage lately is to shut down the switchboards “where the people rule.”What could be more graphic than undistinguished congressmen, acting tough, pretending to understand taxpayer rage, and all the while demonstrating total ignorance of the economic problems?Using banker talking points, these “representatives” of the people hurried past jammed phone lines to catch their flights in one of the weakest, most cowardly chapters in American history.Meanwhile, with his bosses carting away America’s treasure, the scholarly Benjamin Bernanke labeled corrupt thieving private companies that brought the world’s biggest economy to crisis…companies that are “systemically critical.”Bernanke’s bosses, we all know by now, aren’t congressmen or presidents. The spectacular performance of Henry Paulson, the bosses’ main spokesman, would make Pierpont Morgan look like a phone bank volunteer. Paulson, Goldman’s most famous star for all times, was a vision in action…here on the talk circuit, there brow-beating the banking committee, here romancing Nancy Pelosi, there dragging Bush to public announcement after announcement (perhaps writing his speeches and telling him where to stand).Unfortunately, the private interests that brought us this dazzling taxpayer robbery are interested in more than estates, yachts, jets and Dubai skyscrapers and personal pleasure (how about that “relationship” inquiry now involving IMF’s Strauss-Khan?).No, these master string pullers traffic in power: power to pick winners and losers, power to leverage corporations and foreign governments…power to grant or deny a nuclear power plant, a hydroelectric project, war materials, agricultural projects for thousands of acres, matching cheap labor to exploited resources around the planet. True, there’s money to be made in almost every project but added muscle from the IMF, the World Bank and the U.S. State Department turn credit into more than just money…it turns credit into world political power.But credit isn’t enough.Only a superpower such as the U.S., with a stockpile of tactical nuclear weapons, battle ready carrier groups and the best equipped army in the world can give the string pulling financiers the political power they need.Now, as financiers scramble to save their ill-gotten bacon, the options for them to use U.S. military power as carrot and stick leverage are dropping fast. There are two reasons for this: One, the neo-con foreign policy they promoted has isolated the U.S. from the world’s power centers as never before. Two, the American middle class is signaling its intentions finally to move beyond complaining and phone calling about destruction of its earnings — and its strongest anger is directed toward corporate government…banker crooks, plutocrat billionaires, toady congressmen, and war for profit.It holds, no less, the fate of the world in its hands.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:46 pm
1:43 p.m. Dec. gold ends down $22, or 2.8%, at $768 an ounce
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:49 pm
Let’s not confuse socialism with what is in reality facism. Every use of the word socialism in the MSM and by policital campaigns has been misapplied. Facism is the enemy in the U.S. and globally. At least in socialism you have in theory wider distribution via statism, facism is a consolidation of distribution to a few via corporatism.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Revolution!From Jefferson: “He (Bernanke) has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass out People, and eat our their Substances.”It cries for revolution! Revolution!!!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Paulson just did a victory lap through the NYSE to a thunderous applause from the traders (well maybe not thunderous) – reminded me of W declaring victory in Iraq almost 4 years ago to the day.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Paulson’s gifts to the “chosen nine” do not signify government ownership of those banks, but those banks ownership of the govenment!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:01 pm
They,…they….they…who are they?
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 1:01 pm
I think that whomever is chosen to replace Paulson in even more important than who replaces W. I am really worried about how this all shakes out for the economy 2010-2012…protect all your hard earned money and don’t believe a word out of Washington. A monster-this-way-cometh…
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Charts say this market explodes green in 15 minutes….
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:03 pm
Bank stock index is UP almost 1% now….
StocksGoinGreen • October 21st, 2008 at 1:16 pm
BOOOOMMMM PPT IN EARLY TODAY, NO MELTDOWN ONMY WATCH!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:18 pm
It would appear that we are back to a pattern, after the massive hedge fund liquidations recently, that we are “allowed” to go up twice as much as we are “allowed” to go down.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:24 pm
Things that make you go hmmmm…Kirk Kerkorian looks like the Grinchhttp://www.marketwatch.com/
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Wow? Who cares? It’s all such fakery.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:25 pm
WOw-Dow up 180 points from its low!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:26 pm
“Charts.” What a load of shit.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:27 pm
Dow only down 40 points now. This is crazy to watch. Too bad our economy isn’t as exciting as stocks on a daily basis.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:29 pm
VIX is DOWN 2%!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:30 pm
In 1998, in “Bailout Mania,” Jeffrey M. Herbener of City Grove College wrote:At last, the world has a lender-of-last-resort, a menacing Fed for the world, and its name is the IMF…{A]s Ludwig von Mises showed, the interest-rate driven boom must end in bust since the newly created money cannot be confined to the credit markets. Instead, it will be spent again and again to buy consumer goods. Interest rates will eventually be pushed up again, and capital values and stock markets will collapse. The boom comes to an end.{John Maynard] Keynes recognized that the extent and duration of the artificial capital accumulation during the boom depends on the international monetary regime. The U.S., home to the world’s reserve currency, is able to extend its booms further and for longer periods than any other country by “exporting” its monetary inflation…This is precisely what has happened. Consider the paradoxical movement of the stock market and the GDP. The meteoric rise in the stock market, up about 28 percent per year for the six years of the boom, has resulted from the twin causes of low interest rates and high earnings.The relatively anemic increases in GDP, about 2.5 percent per year during the same six years, coincides with an overseas boom in investment and production. This overseas boom does not count in the U.S.’s GDP. The U.S. economy dwarfs that of its foreign partners, so this transfer of production will lower our growth rate but greatly increase growth in smaller economies.On the 1996 list of developing countries that received the largest amount of foreign, private investment, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand rank third, fifth, and sixth. The regions of East and Southeast Asia received nearly half of the $243.8 billion in foreign, private investment.China, now called the next economic miracle, has been far and away the largest recipient of foreign, private investment since 1992. It received $52 billion of these investment funds in 1996. To the extent that these capital projects are fueled by central-bank inflation, they are part of the “exported” boom. (If China escapes financial collapse, it will be due to its pace of privatization.)To continue their domestic booms, adjunct countries must refrain from conducting an “independent” monetary policy. They must coordinate their own central-bank monetary inflation with the Fed’s. If instead their central banks pile domestic monetary inflation on top of the “imported” dollar inflation, domestic price inflation will rapidly follow, since they cannot “export” their own monetary inflation.If they try to delay or deny the decline in their currencies’ purchasing powers by linking or pegging their currencies to the dollar, then instead of smooth, gradual decline they will face swift and massive devaluation. Devaluation, like its domestic counterpart price inflation, pushes interest rates up, causing capital values and stock markets to crash.Evidence that this process was in full swing in Thailand was obvious in 1997. Its central bank had been inflating the baht at higher rates than Fed inflation of the dollar. Flush with funds, Thai banks extended loans to riskier and riskier projects ending up with speculative indebtedness in the expanding real estate bubble.Thailand’s central bank responded to the advent of devaluation in typical fashion by abruptly halting its monetary inflation and, in an act of desperation, increasing its demand for the baht by using its dollar reserves to purchase the baht in international currency markets. Neither of these measures could overcome the force of the previous monetary inflation.The upward spike of interest rates from the decline in the baht’s purchasing power and the reversal of central bank monetary inflation and credit expansion caused the real estate and stock markets in Thailand to crash. The Thai stock market fell 45 percent since the beginning of 1997. Suddenly the growing and profitable banks of yesterday were bankrupt as the value of their collateral collapsed and the number of bad loans soared.Far from poor entrepreneurial judgment or lack of vigorous regulatory oversight, bankruptcy is an inevitable part of a central-bank-induced business cycle. It is the downward counterpart to the artificial expansion of bank loans and capital values of the boom. From the S&L debacle of the 1980s, to the continuing banking problems of Japan in the 1990s, to the current problems in Southeast Asia, the pattern is the same.The Thai experience has been repeated with other Southeast Asian currencies. The Malaysian ringgit, Indonesian rupiah, Philippine peso, Singapore dollar, and Korean won all fell to speculative reassessment. Their currencies, stock markets, and banking systems collapsed. Malaysia’s market fell 48 percent, Indonesia’s fell 30 percent, Phillippines’s 45 percent, Singapore’s 33 percent, and South Korea’s 24 percent. (China is up 40 percent since the beginning of 1997.)The nature of the international dollar-reserve system explains another aspect of the Asian currency debacle. What the U.S. government must avoid, if it wants to avert a similar financial debacle, is a repatriation of dollars held abroad…Any significant disgorging of these holdings would set in motion price inflation in America and the resulting upward spike of interest rates would result in a stock market crash, bankruptcy, and liquidation, quickly bringing our boom to an end.Of these enormous and increasing foreign holdings, tens of billions of dollars are in the hands of the central banks of the Asian Tigers. Thailand spent about two billion dollars of its reserves to defend the baht before being dissuaded from this policy and convinced to let the baht float.What convinced them was an IMF bailout of $17 billion. As with Mexico’s $50 billion bailout in 1995, the IMF arranged to compensate Thailand, and now the other Asian Tigers, so that defending the currency peg became unnecessary. For its part, Indonesia enjoyed a $23 billion gift from the IMF following its currency debacle.More bailouts are planned. The IMF recently announced (1997) that its 181 members will increase its capital base by $285 billion, a 45 percent increase, to be the international lender-of-last-resort to bail out countries bankrupted by their own folly and greed. By increasing the incentive to inflate money and credit, this new role for the IMF will result in more frequent and severe international debacles…The real lesson of the Asian currency crisis is this: only God can perform miracles. Central banks and the IMF merely produce inflation, business cycles, and financial crises.http://mises.org/freemarket_detail.aspx?control=98
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:31 pm
are you guys gnomes or something? with a bit of poetic license you have been quite accurate as these markets defy gravity…
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Stocks are downInterest rates are downGold is downOil is downHome prices are downCommodities are downEmployment is downThis does look as deflation, doesn’t it?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Must be Warren spewing his patriotism
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 1:35 pm
Guest on 2008-10-21 11:56:40It is not nice. But it is not unusual all around the world.But you know the story behind?Microsoft (Ballmer) came to Budapest to make presser on the Hungarian government for renewing a software license of Windows in some public segments. And there are always guys who do not like if the own government is blackmailed or there is a corruption behind.
Casper the Friendly Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:36 pm
I like the “Monopoly Game” analogy. I used to play this game with my brother when we were kids. When the game was tipping in my brother’s favor and I said that I was ready to quit, he’d loan me money in exchange for whatever properties I still owned — just to keep me playing the game. Of course, with less properties, I collected less money and, as you can guess, the game went progressively downhill. The game finally ended when I had (a) no money and (b) no property.Sort of sounds like the current situation except our own financial game began in the early 1970′s. First, wages stagnated and fell. Oh well, we were a nation of savers back then so we tapped into our savings accounts. When this dried up, the banks were there to offer us easier ways to tap into the equity of our homes. Now, here we are, with no savings in the bank and no equity in our property.Game Over.
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Anonymous, as a Hungarian I do not recommend shorting the Hungarian market. I’m also a short seller, but I’m making my money on other markets like shorting the DAX.
StocksGoinGreen • October 21st, 2008 at 1:41 pm
YOU BETTER TAKE STOCKS OFF THE LIST FOR TODAY….BOOM!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:43 pm
“they” are simply “they”They are not to be named.[evil hollow laughter]
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:45 pm
well according to some folks here we will soon get one currency for the whole planet. Sounds groovy. So why bother with some measly euro.
IVEDONEMYJOB • October 21st, 2008 at 1:45 pm
AHHHH GREEN!!
StocksGoinGreen • October 21st, 2008 at 1:47 pm
YAH GOTTA LOVE “FREE” MARKETS!! WE HAVE SHEEPLE TO SELL TO!!
Gloomy • October 21st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Too many dominos all falling at once-Iceland, Korea, Argentina, Hungary-to be followed by larger dominos until it all falls apart.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 1:54 pm
HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE????????????????2:51 p.m. [LEH] Lehman swaps settle with ‘no loss allocations’ – DTCC
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Probably the US taxpayer picked up the tab via the Feds new TPBOFL program or ” Taxpayer BENd Over For Lehman”
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:01 pm
Magic buying Ferries are loaded up today…and as usual, right on time, here they come!! Dow green right on schedule…
Theta • October 21st, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Seconded. Are there any indications who might replace Paulson, if indeed he would be replaced?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:06 pm
that was an erroneous report – no news yet – it was their MBS that settled
Capone • October 21st, 2008 at 2:10 pm
the play by play Guest, stocks going green guy is really, truly annoying and dilutes the content here. GO AWAY! if you have something meaningful to say please do, otherwise, please please please go away. look at a chart of a daily market it goes up and down. shall we all become guest who type look the market is going up or gee look the market is going down. please spare us !
StocksGoinGreen • October 21st, 2008 at 2:14 pm
DONE! BUT BE WARNED, I TAKE MY BUYERS WITH ME!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:18 pm
The Charmed Lives of the Crony Capitalists: How the Banksters are Making a Killing Off the Bailout By PAM MARTENS | October 17/20, 2008 CounterPunchIn 1897, when 8-year old Virginia O’Hanlon posed her Santa Claus query to the New York Sun, she received a heart-warming editorial response reassuring her that “He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist…”Today, we hand our 8 year olds a $13 trillion national debt while our Congress hands Wall Street banksters the national purse without so much as a hearing to determine the cause of the debt collapse. Worse still, the money is doled out to the very same individuals who leveraged their institutions to casino status.Americans are correctly outraged at the spectacle of U.S. crony capitalism crashing stock and bond markets around the globe while simultaneously watching the poster boys of crony capitalism on Monday, October 13, 2008 march up the granite steps of the United States Treasury building in their Armani shoes and heist a fresh $125 Billion of taxpayer dough in broad daylight.The U.S. Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson’s, $700 billion bailout plan to buy up distressed mortgage assets has spun off its own $250 billion subsidiary plan (skipping that pesky detail called taxation with representation) to inject $125 billion in equity capital into 9 of the biggest commercial and investment banks in the country. Another $125 billion may possibly go to smaller regional banks and thrifts, assuming they will sign on to the deal.And what will taxpayers get for their investment in these financial firms whose stock prices are getting hammered as the public recoils in revulsion at what they have done to our financial system? The taxpayers, who were not invited to send their own legal representative to the negotiating table, will receive a paltry 5% dividend, exactly half of what Warren Buffett received for his recent investment in General Electric, a company that actually makes something real, like jet engines and light bulbs.Now we learn from the U.S. Treasury web site that it has hired the law firm of Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett to represent our taxpayer interests going forward at a cost to us of $300,000 for six months work. But we’re not allowed to know their hourly wages; that information has been blacked out on the Treasury’s contract. Curiously, the Treasury has named in its contract the specific lawyers it wants to work for us. Two of those are Lee A. Meyerson and David Eisenberg. Mr. Meyerson has been a central player in facilitating the bank consolidations that have led to the present train wreck, including building JPMorgan Chase from the body parts of Chemical Bank, Chase Manhattan and Bank One.Mr. Eisenberg has played a central role in the proliferation of the credit derivatives blowing up on the books of the Frankenbanks created by Mr. Meyerson. Here’s what the Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett web site says about its relationships and Mr. Eisenberg’s work (see link):…This is an unconscionable conflict of interest given that JPMorgan Chase is receiving $25 billion of taxpayer funds under this bailout and that the program is very likely to be buying the very toxic waste for which Mr. Eisenberg wrote legal opinions and assisted in proliferating.What most Americans do not understand, because mainstream media rarely explains it, is the incestuous relationship between the U.S. Treasury and this small band of financial marauders who busted the entire financial system with insane levels of leveraged derivative bets… FOR THE REST OF THE STORY:http://www.counterpunch.org/martens10172008.html
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:19 pm
This is a great site but a bit of levity is actually refreshing – more to the point I find the partisan political posts or rambling conspiracy essays to be dilutive – all part of a community IMO – and be honest pure economics can be a bit dry sometimes .. hopefully GG does not take your advice
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Capone, Capone. Indulge me. I love Stocksgoingreen, and I miss Stocks-to-the-Moon. He captures the action and it’s part of the day’s history, isn’t it? Soooooooo. Tell him you’re sorry. Hmmm? For me?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:25 pm
and furthermore it is also the reason why the US government is now encouraging takeovers: they know that the economic activity is decreasing and that the U.S.A. of tomorrow cannot sustain a large amount of financial institutions. Thus they prefer that the many merge to a few.About the US government encouraging takeovers, see:http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/21/us-is-said-to-be-urging-new-mergers-in-banking/
Dan (Guest #84928429) • October 21st, 2008 at 2:34 pm
Add me (anonymous guest #84928429) to the list of people who would miss SGG in his absence. Levity is a good thing these days, and frequently in short supply…I think he also highlights the absurdity of these markets these days. Seemingly no amount of bad news can deter these stock markets… it’s silliness.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:38 pm
Don’t let Capone’s grumpy day put you off StocksGoinGreen. It’s a stressful time for all of us and we all react to stress differently. Capone will probably feel better tomorrow.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:40 pm
And at least Stocks… identifies who he/she/it is (well sort of) and besides when/if Obama wins we’ll all be singing “cum by ya”, whether we want to or not.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:43 pm
Once a cloak of mystery blocked most of the world from seeing how powerful men such as the Rothschilds financed wars and used credit to develop empires.Financiers and major banks, of course, have played an important role in the development of western civilization. But over the past century London and New York based investment banks, now creating currency out of thin air and establishing their own commissions (guaranteed by government), have come out from behind the curtain to show their real power.Who are “they” in this story?Certainly, banks such as Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan with other enterprises they select are at the center of the power controlling the United States. They pick the treasury secretaries, Fed chairmen and top financial advisors to all major political parties. What other corporations can walk into the federal treasury and pick up whatever they need? These private companies were insolvent, yet their officers can’t even count the millions of dollars flowing to them.“They” is “them.”
randy • October 21st, 2008 at 2:45 pm
I heard Jamie Dimon from JP Morgan. Can you belive that BS?
EconomyInTheSewer • October 21st, 2008 at 2:46 pm
I agree. I look forward to StocksGoinGreen to lighten things up occasionally. Besides, his comments (since they are brief and UPPERCASE) are easy to view or skip over.
jomos • October 21st, 2008 at 2:50 pm
3 years ago,I was with a group of stock holders of a certain company.We researched “naked shorting (counterfeiting of shares)” of said company by brokerage houses with the DTCC’s (settler of the trades)blessings.Even though there was no outstanding shares on the market,the brokers sold all authorized shares on a single day.When we wrote Anne Nazereth of the SEC enforcement,she blew us off as whiners.The DTCC is an arm of the Federal Reserve and as such can authorize naked shorting (counterfeiting of shares) to settle trades at the DTCC.This is why long term positions should have stock certificates in your name with you in possession of those certificates.If you buy stocks using Etrade,Ameritrade,…the shares are in their name not yours.The DTCC can print shares as easy as the FED and print money.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Bad news from another CEE country:Russian Companies, Banks Seek $100 Billion in State LoansOct. 21 (Bloomberg) — Russian companies and banks have applied for almost $100 billion of loans from state development bank Vnesheconombank to refinance foreign debt after credit markets worldwide seized up, threatening economic growth….http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601095&sid=aYvszEUUPLmw&refer=east_europe
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 2:54 pm
I also heard robert reich and tim Geithner of the FED
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:08 pm
4:05 p.m. [ETFC] E-Trade provisions $518 mln in third quarter4:05 p.m. [ETFC] E-Trade quarterly loss from continuing ops 60 cents a share4:05 p.m. [ETFC] E-Trade quarterly net loss nine cents a share4:05 p.m. [ETFC] E-Trade reports quarterly net loss of $50.5 million4:05 p.m. [ETFC] E-Trade lifts home equity loss estimate by 20%4:05 p.m. [ETFC] E-Trade says it won’t make profit in fourth quarter 2008
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:10 pm
WOW! I don’t know if you folks notice but the second after SGG said he/she was “taking my buyers with me” The Dow sold of over 200 points!
Sasch • October 21st, 2008 at 3:11 pm
Will Russia fall apart?Late last month, Russian president Dmitry Medvedev made a startling admission. Speaking at a conference on social-economic development in Kamchatka, he said:“If we do not step up the level of activity of our work [in the Russian Far East], then in the final analysis we can lose everything.”What Medvedev’s words betray is the fear of Russia’s leaders that their country may not hold together.Even though this may come as a shock to many, the only surprise is the frankness with which Medvedev expressed himself. So much so that one Russian news agency described his statement as “unprecedented.” But whether Russian officials admit it or not, it is a matter of historical record that Russia has never been a stable nation. Rather it has always been a country that struggled to maintain its territorial cohesiveness. This was the case under the Czars, under the communists and also in the post-Soviet erahttp://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=B1924265-A5E4-4EDB-BF0E-69FB31D5123D
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:15 pm
The aggregate value of US Fed and Treasury programs is approaching the $3T mark including the brand new $600bn program announced just today to further backstop money markets. That is not to say the $3T number is an expense but it is an indication of just how far behind the curve Hank and Ben were and just how lucrative these programs will be for Hank’s friends. At the very least it should help to replace some of the easy money the ibanks had become accustomed to not to mention the potential for shenanigans.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:24 pm
Geithner is really the hired hand of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, where all Federal Reserve decisions are made, and of Goldman’s Stephen Friedman, who is Board chair of the NYFed.From Stone Point Capital:Stephen Friedman joined Stone Point Capital in 1998 and serves as Chairman of the firm. Mr. Friedman is a retired Chairman of Goldman, Sachs & Co. He is Chairman of the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and of the Intelligence Oversight Board and has been appointed to serve as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York effective January 1, 2008. From December 2002 to December 2004, he served as Assistant to President George W. Bush for Economic Policy and Director of the National Economic Council. Mr. Friedman joined Goldman, Sachs & Co. in 1966 and became a Partner in 1973. He was Vice Chairman and co-Chief Operating Officer from 1987 to November 1990, and co-Chairman or Chairman from 1990 to 1994.Mr. Friedman is currently a board member of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., the Council on Foreign Relations and Chairman of the Board of Harbor Point Limited, a Trident III portfolio company. He is a trustee of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the Aspen Institute. Prior affiliations include Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Columbia University and director of Wal-Mart Stores and Fannie Mae. Mr. Friedman also previously served as a director of AXIS Capital Holdings Limited, Sedgwick CMS Holdings, Inc. and Vertafore, Inc. (f/k/a AMS Services, Inc.), all of which are or were portfolio companies of the Trident Funds. Mr. Friedman received a B.A. from Cornell University and an LL.B. from Columbia Law School.So much for “conflict” of interests.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:26 pm
John Corzine will be the leading candidate if Obama wins
JimmyTheBanker • October 21st, 2008 at 3:26 pm
The global melt-down is officially in full swing-it is both unfortunate and unconcionable how we got here. If I were a US politician, I would not be too proud to boast of that right now-especially while looking your grandchildren square in the eyes.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:27 pm
ETrade is toast-halted after-hours
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:30 pm
4:28 p.m.Lockheed Martin gives soft 2009 view on pension costs4:24 p.m.Sun Microsystems shares tumble on loss forecast
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Robert Rubin, aka Goldman Sachs/Citigroup, was an “advisor” to Hilliary Clinton and after her demise marched straight into Obama’s camp without missing a beat. Here’s hoping Obama is only superficially listening to him and will discard him after his election to the oval office. I don’t think Obama would dare return him to the Treasury given the nation’s sentiment against Goldman Sachs. But…
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:34 pm
4:33 p.m.[YHOO] Yahoo expects to cut 10% of global jobs in Q4
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:37 pm
The US model is alive and well! When rules get in the way, waive them!Double dipping, anyone?The United Nations, with a headquarters staff of approximately 15,500, is apparently relying on a battalion of retirees to fill important vacancies. The cost of keeping codgers on its payroll to do jobs that full time employees apparently cannot handle has soared from $33 million in 2004-2005 to $50 million in 2006-2007.In the process, the world organization appears to have been violating its own limits on how much retirees are allowed to earn after they take a U.N. pension, and how long they can be kept on the job. Those rules were seemingly designed to prevent double-dipping by former workers, or the filling of jobs that might otherwise go to full-time staff.But one small group of pensioners, 135 people in all, appear to have done far, far better than anyone else in breaking through the post-retirement salary ceiling. That group, consisting of higher-level professional and administrative employees, and representing little more than 10 percent of the total number surveyed, pulled in $11.4 million, or more than 20 percent of the amount spent on the growing post-retirement work force, according to an internal U.N. study on the group.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:38 pm
Argentina ois not falling. It is stealing again from it´s citizens. But can´t compare that with today´s Iceland.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:39 pm
4:37 p.m. U.K. likely in recession, Bank of England’s King says
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:44 pm
Looks like AAPL beat by .15 but revenues were a bit shy of estimates. That might mean a trip to the wood shed@!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:46 pm
4:43 p.m. [AAPL] Apple late traded shares halted last trade at $93.32
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:46 pm
4:43 p.m. [AAPL] Apple late traded shares halted last trade at $93.32
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:52 pm
any news on Lehman CDS settlements?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:54 pm
If I can remember Etrade was already toast last year.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:54 pm
Completely corrupted, no big surprise.Lets call it United Nothing!
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 3:59 pm
I wasn’t sure what he meant, taking “my buyers with me” but you are correct the market sold off at just about that moment. Probably some sort of “market angel unawares” who had chosen to grace us with his presence; now we’re really in trouble
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 4:02 pm
I heard it could be as late as tomorrow AM – between that and Apple it should be another interesting day
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 4:03 pm
It starts trading at 5:10 NYT
riding out the storm • October 21st, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Does anyone have an idea of a safer currency to start accumulating if the dollar devalues? Swiss Franc, Euro, British Pound?
tg • October 21st, 2008 at 4:10 pm
All around the world the banks are suffering in USD shortage. USD is the best currency at the moment.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 4:21 pm
shortage? at the rate Fed is printing it there should not be any. I think this guy must be joking.
riding out the storm • October 21st, 2008 at 4:25 pm
That’s my real concern, if the fed is printing money and not tracking at what rate it’s being printed surely a devaluation is coming soon. I realize the whole world is in a recession but was curious about opinions on what currency might continue to hold the best value.
riding out the storm • October 21st, 2008 at 4:26 pm
errr fed = treasury
Mark • October 21st, 2008 at 4:33 pm
When the USD heads the other way, what currency then?This might shed some light:https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2187rank.htmlNote the bottom countries.
Brian • October 21st, 2008 at 4:55 pm
The short answer to your question is Gold.There is no “safe” currency in this environment, but if the USD deflates, gold will rise. Other countries will certainly start running their printing presses to keep their currency at relative weakness to the USD, so even currencies that you might be told are “safe” are at risk in a hyperinflation environment.However, no one can print Gold. I like it over any other commodity just for the simple fact that it has a long, long history as the flight-to-safety repository of wealth, and when doubt flies all around, people will (many very reluctantly) put their money in this useless metal.–Brian
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 21st, 2008 at 4:56 pm
“The game finally ended when I had (a) no money and (b) no property.”Sounds like a plan. BTW: is your brother name Hank or Ben?
John Ryskamp • October 21st, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Ha ha!!! The next thing Nouriel will be saying is that we need to bail out China because, if we don’t, it will present a “systemic risk.” Look:Professor Glyn Davis, who runs an exporting business called University of Melbourne (he and his staff teach 11,000 foreign fee-paying students), was in China last week visiting his main market.Usually, he says, when students return to China with their Melbourne degrees, it’s just a matter of choosing which job to take. The cost of the degree is more than covered by the salary premium they command; the investment is always worthwhile and the demand for places is therefore always strong.Last week Professor Davis found that most of the graduates he had sent back in July were still looking for jobs. The few who were now employed had found that their salary premium had shrunk dramatically.The Melbourne University vice-chancellor, and convenor of the 2020 Summit a few months ago, had another indicator to share with a small group over lunch at Austrade yesterday: he just received his first letter from parents – in Singapore as it happens – asking to defer their child’s tuition fees because the father has just lost his job in the financial sector. He agreed, but expects to get many more of these letters.The optimism of the 2020 Summit over that weekend in April seems a long time ago now. With its focus on creativity, governance, indigenous issues and sustainability, it already feels like part of a lost Australian era.The final report from the economic stream chaired by former Westpac CEO David Morgan, entitled ‘Future of the Australian Economy’, opened with these words: “Big challenges confront the Australian economy – among them the reality of ongoing economic change and competition, the aging of our population, climate change, and the continued projected expansion of China and India. We must be ready, and we must devise ways to grasp the opportunities presented in a way that reinforces our national values of opportunity and fairness.”Now, just six months later, we must devise ways to survive the decline of China and India, and none more than the convenor of the summit, and Australia’s largest exporter of education to Asia.Andy Xie, the Shanghai-based economist who used to work for Morgan Stanley, said at a conference in Dubai recently that China is actually in crisis: “Forty percent of its GDP is generated by exports. Now, for the first time ever, exports are grinding to a halt. In addition, the real estate bubble has burst. These two sectors were responsible for more than half the annual growth in our GDP.”On Monday the Chinese government reported that GDP growth had slowed from 11 per cent to 9 per cent, its slowest growth for five years. Sherman Chan, an analyst with Moody’s in Sydney, told the Los Angeles Times yesterday that if growth in China dips below 8 per cent, the conditions would be equivalent to a recession.A consumer products analyst based in China, Michael Dunne, said: “China will not compensate for falls in the rest of the world. It’s not going to be the saviour.”Yesterday I discussed the fall in the Baltic Dry Index of shipping rates caused by the refusal of banks to produce letters of credit, which is causing shipping to grind to a halt.A trade adviser based in Sydney, Sri Annaswamy, wrote to me last night to correct me, explaining that it’s not that shipping is being affected by the credit crisis – it’s that banks don’t want to open or honour letters of credit “that they know would ultimately be defaulted upon due to the Chinese buyer’s refusal/inability to accept the shipment (that’s the core of the problem)”.In other words, the problem with shipping, as he sees it, is not an extension of the counter-party risk issues that are crushing the credit markets – it’s caused by a more fundamental concern about the future of the Chinese economy.By the way, Sri kindly forwarded to me an email he had sent to his clients yesterday explaining why the decline in the Baltic Dry Index points to a global recession, and is perhaps the best economic indicator that includes China. It is worth republishing in full:“The Baltic Dry is a composite index of shipping freight rates across 20 odd major dry bulk carrying routes and covers all three types of ships – Capesizes, Supramaxes and Panamaxes. The index is dominated by the large capesizes (150,000 tonnes plus) ships which operate on both time charter and voyage charter basis and typically carry raw materials for steel manufacturers (iron ore and coking coal mostly) who in turn make steel for automobile manufacturers as well as building and construction companies.“As the supply capacity is very difficult to adjust up and down (large capesizes cannot be created or destroyed without at least a few years time), it gives an accurate indicator of the forward-looking volume demand for iron ore and coal from manufacturers. Hence, it serves as a very reliable forward indicator of the level of global manufacturing activity.“For example, if steel makers are buying more iron ore, it means their projected demand from car companies and builders is looking very strong and vice versa.“China obviously is the biggest iron-ore and coal demand driver and Brazil and Australia are the biggest iron-ore supply drivers.“Because it is not distorted by financial market considerations and impacted mainly by volume shipped, it is a very robust indicator of the level of global trade and economic activity (in my opinion).“Hence it points to a serious global recession, now, in my view.”
PeterJB • October 21st, 2008 at 5:38 pm
“Furthermore, some of these banks have now turned around and said that they may use Paulson’s cash injection to go on a buying spree and look for takeovers. Doesn’t sound to me like these banks were quite as desperate (financially) as the Gov’t made out. Looks a lot more like they gamed the system, so they could swallow up their competition. Why is the taxpayer funding something like this???”PeteCA on 2008-10-21 10:59:42A most vital and astute observation – what you are about to witness is a fully blown fascist ennoblement program funded by the taxpayer; that is, the consolidation of the banking system by a few banks chosen by Hank and Ben, over then many Banks. This is exactly the opposite of what is absolutely necessary – but is consistent with Banker supremacy intentions.So the FedRes and SEC decide who will be the members of the new Club, take the money from Federal Coffers, (present and future) rewrite the rules by burning the books, lie to the public, and just take is all down.That is, – a takeover; the Federal Reserve is building its support base and rapidly as the Supreme Global Authority; the US Constitutional Government is now fully redundant and almost entirely irrelevant…Don’t you think that the scenario of either Obama or MaCain ruling the World is mindboggling frightening?I believe what you see in the Press is only just a small and convenient disclosure of what is really happening behind the scenes.Ho hum
Casper the Friendly Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 5:45 pm
I’ve also played the game (version 2) with Arthur, George, Paul, and Alan (big family!). I don’t get it — I just can’t seem to win no matter who I’m playing against!
rgemonitor Free Trial • October 21st, 2008 at 5:48 pm
How long before the economic crisis transforms into an international political crisis? e.g. Pakistan, which like Hungary is in dire circumstances.
John Ryskamp • October 21st, 2008 at 6:13 pm
The problem is not the settling of swaps. The problem is that, as I have said for two years now, ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IS DECLINING.There is only one thing which will increase economic activity: banning housing evictions.And look! Now even Paulson is on Rose saying that he has to prevent millions of home foreclosures!!But that is not what I want, and they know it. Just read my wonderful, insightful book, The Eminent Domain Revolt. What genius wrote that tome?!?These fascist clods, and their little fascist potted plant lawyers, know perfectly well that, in scrutiny regime terms, the demand is for an elevation in the level of scrutiny for housing. And what elevation, you ask? Just check out page 15 of my book. I offer these scummy dogs SIX new levels of scrutiny for housing, in addition to intermediate and strict.We are currently fighting a struggle, and it is ALL about page 15 of that book. I even offer them a teeny weeny increase in the level of scrutiny for housing above minimum scrutiny. It is, direct scrutiny, which says that policy with regard to housing must “articulately facilite a frequent government purpose.” That is just a tiny bit more protection that current Lindsey v. Normet minimum scrutiny, which says that policy with regard to housing must “rationally relate to a legitimate government purpose.”Will the political system even grant the SLIGHTEST elevation of scrutiny for housing? Hell no–even at the same time they are all saying they want to prevent home foreclosures.Why not? Because1. it would mean that the government has to show RESULTS for its policies; and2. it would enlarge the number of FACTS relevant to determining whether a housing eviction should go forward.Together, these things mean decreased power in the political system over housing, particularly MONEY.So remember, this current debacle is occurring because of ONE THING: the American political system’s resistance to even SLIGHTLY increasing individually enforceable rights in housing.Our little Mussolinis are perfectly aware that ALL the facts demand this higher level and that there are NO facts in support of maintaining housing at minimum scrutiny.This is the reason I say that economic activity will never increase as long as the level of scrutiny is not increased for housing. Until this issue is resolved in FAVOR of raising the level of scrutiny for housing, deals simply will not get done. For the obvious reason that parties to ANY contract relating to ANY fact relating to HOUSING, cannot know their contractual rights and duties. Would you sign anything, knowing that this conflict exists? In lieu of actual deals, the political system is trying corporate fascism. It failed for Mussolini, Franco and Hitler, and it will fail for Brown Brothers Harriman (hello George, you darling love monster you!).So this is the inner, true story of the current crisis. As I have said before, it is not a financial or economic crisis. It is a rights crisis.Stayed tuned kiddies!
PeterJB • October 21st, 2008 at 6:35 pm
An additional comment:I believe that serious consideration should be given to this hypothesis, that we are trending automatically towards a new socio-economic structure due to the fact that our current structure is irreversibly bankrupt.There are just not enough real and value assets to support the many financial institutions and all that hangs off them and the actions of the ‘incompetent and stupid’ that is, the Keynesians and the consensual’s, are pushing the trend – incorrectly (IMHO) – in this direction, er, to a much, much bigger failure or global collapse (“worser and worser”).Obviously, these actions are consistent with the fascist mentality and model; by default.Those responsibly, in their one-hour-ahead-from-now vision capacity, then Benanke, Krugman and Roubini crowd, believe that ‘their’ ends justify maintaining ‘their’ status quo ideal, while the supportive groupings, Paulson and Co., they see this as global economic dominance by the USA, in their life-time.Wrong! Money has no morality and does not perform along lines of misguided loyalties; it obeys Austrian economic observations for certain conditions. And, it is clear that all the conditions affecting the socio-economic forecasting are just not being taken into consideration. IOW, “leadership” is believing its own “Bulls&^t” and applying this as relevant data to their already erroneous (by definition) mathematical modeling. Yes, Wrong again!So, all we see is volatility?; Yes, Correct and not much else!Can anyone see the illogical ideologies that are again being followed by those who see themselves as intelligent beings? “Leadership” is out of control!”lEADERSHIP” IS MERELY REACTING!Fascism ends is disaster; that’s histroy.So, 10 Banks end up with all the World’s assets! And, then what happens?We now have at least two generations of grassroots frugality (Mish), mistrust of banks and government to look forward to so I ask again:”And?”.Ho hum
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 6:41 pm
Stop it already with this ridiculous idea. You can ban housing evictions.No one in the US would pay their mortgage, and the economy would be destroyed in 15 minutes.Talk about moral hazard. Think about it. If no one could be evicted, would anyone pay? NOAll banks would go bankrupt. All financial institutions would be obliterated. Every credit card and ATM would stop, and the entire world would be without any financial instrument instantly. Like, within 15 minutes of the announcement.Total chaos, riots, and probably global destruction as society totally collapses with runs on food, water…Come on man. Stop posting about what is suicide for the human race. Yes, we are in for a deep depression and an uncertain future, but anything is better than what you’re proposing.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 6:51 pm
US has been in a bear market since 2000, the 2003-2007 period was a cyclical bull within the secular bear market. We are again in bear market territory.We have to test the lows at least of 7500 on the dow the 2002 lows.Was anyone calling for dow 9k a year ago?Mkts move quickly and violently now.
PeterJB • October 21st, 2008 at 7:01 pm
I agree with you and comment:Leadership should govern by example and be held ultimately accountable – not by word, but in deed.As with the CPI which has be progressively changed over presidential periods to avoid the scrutiny and thus the judgment of political leadership “deed”, so has most, if not all, such oversight mechanisms and so much so, that frog sitting in the pan in the water on the fire, doesn’t realize that it is dead.Now, the bureaucracies have gone along with these changes; cpi, housing, etc., and should also be held accountable; not just the political ‘godhead” – which I totally agree with @ PeteCA, must be the object of the pointed finger of “j’accuse”.But, we the people, are also accountable because we put the morons in office (because we believe their promises to us that we would get something too) and we put up with the lying cheating bureaucracy and their abuse of office; so we are also responsible and subject to accountability.Therefore, what is happening is a systemic socio-economic shift (collapse / change / breakdown) where we must place blame correctly on “leadership”.Yes, this is a “leadership” crisis, for all the stated reasons and no amount of “fix” will get this donkey to remain in the race.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Trouble in Asia … Some Japaneses banks bid ask only .. currency issues…
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Everyone on cue stop paying your debts and watch how quickly the bankers will be destroyed.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Niall Ferguson has published the following informative volumes:The House of Rothschild: Volume 1: Money’s Prophets: 1798-1848The House of Rothschild: Volume 2: The World’s Banker: 1849-1999
wawawa • October 21st, 2008 at 8:16 pm
Personal observation about GOLD.Back in Feb. I bought some gold coins in San Diego for $20 above spot price.Three week ago from the same dealer. I put order to buy some gold coins for $60 above spot price.Today, I went to get delivery of my Am. Eagle, and for curiosity I asked what is spread today, the dealer told me it is $100.I just would say woooooo!
AfA • October 21st, 2008 at 8:18 pm
Is there a third price?
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 8:25 pm
I second Mark
Pecos Banker • October 21st, 2008 at 8:36 pm
According the Leap 2020 published called “Crise systemique globale-Avril 2007, point d’inflection de la phase d’impact” the following,among other items listed, was to take place in April 2007 :2. spectacular rise in forclosures in America: five million people thrown on the street3. drop in value of houses of 25%6. increase in commericial conflicts between America and China7. Chinese sell the dollar/ end of yen carry trade8. brutal collapse of dollar vis a vis Euro, Yuan and Yen.9. collapse of British poundThey predicted at least 10 million people thrown in the street in 2007.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 8:52 pm
True. But in February 2008 they published an alert about the coming economic shocks to the U.S. in September 2008:According to LEAP/E2020, the end of the third quarter of 2008 will be marked by a new tipping point in the unfolding of the global systemic crisis. At that time indeed, the cumulated impact of the various sequences of the crisis (see table below) will reach its maximum strength and affect decisively the very heart of the systems concerned, on the frontline of which the United States, epicentre of the current crisis. In the United States, this new tipping point will translate into a collapse of the real economy, final socio-economic stage of the serial bursting of the housing and financial bubbles (1) and of the pursuance of the US dollar fall. The collapse of US real economy means the virtual freeze of the American economic machinery: private and public bankruptcies in large numbers, companies and public services closing down massively (2),…
Armchair • October 21st, 2008 at 9:05 pm
Joke: Mish’s advice to Roubini regarding the Hungarian situation is that the Hungarians should get on their knees and beg for insight from the Austrians.
Anonymous • October 21st, 2008 at 9:32 pm
The Sheriff of Cook County Illinois (that’s Chicago) has announced a couple weeks ago that he would not enforce any evictions for mortgage defaults.We’re still here in Chicago.Your pontificating is rather dumb-looking. Ryskamp is talking about reality. Are we really going to throw a large percentage of America out of their homes? Will stability prevail while it happens and afterwards? That would be more like “suicide for the human race”.The human race is not the banks. Duh.
AfA • October 21st, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Good one.But I guess this applies to not only Hungarians.
Medic • October 21st, 2008 at 9:46 pm
Which ones of us were missing this guy? Can we send him back again? I am remembering now why we appreciated his eviction from here.John,Really, for Christ’s Sake! Stop with you beloved tome. I have not read it (nor do I have any intent to) but if it is as full of the diarrhea of the keys you spew here, it must be a real page turner.Your arguments are ill formed and pre-suppose that anyone here knows what the hell you reference for legal cases. Your terminology seems to be unique to you which translates to: If we can’t follow your argument, you are just a guy who writes for his own ego. Sorry pal. I’m thus far not impressed with anything other than the fact that you somehow managed to get a book into print.I suspect it was self-financed or done by some tiny publisher who was anxious to get anything out there.Write so you can be understood or go back to whence you came and don’t bother to return.
AfA • October 21st, 2008 at 9:52 pm
Dear Professor;
The vulnerabilities of the economy include a large current account deficit, a still excessive fiscal deficit, a partially overvalued currency, serious maturity and currency mismatches in the financial system, the household sector and the corporate sector, low stock of foreign reserve and high level of short term foreign currency debt that is at risk of a roll-off.
Taken out of context, wouldn’t a reader recognizes a much bigger economy? And as you perfectly diagnosed the situation, why wouldn’t the same “solutions” apply to this bigger economy:
First of all, a meaningful further reduction in the fiscal deficit is essential.Fifth, the authorities may want to seek an IMF program as they have signaled in the past week.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:06 pm
I am in San Diego also. Today I went to LA and sold 95 gold eagles and 4 10oz gold bars. They had no stock till I sold them mine at $50 over spot, so they can sell around $90 over spot. To bad I didn’t know you wanted some. Hopefully I will be right this time and the dollar will continue to strengthen, at least temporarily. Unfortunately I got lost in the noise, and did not listen to those who said the dollar was on steroids!hlowe
K in TX • October 21st, 2008 at 10:25 pm
Awww…I like SGG. And I kind of miss dovish Fed/rally to the sun, too.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Medic, your apparent attempt at critique, while unnecessary, is weak. Low enough already, your blasphemy puts what remains to the torch. Why is it that non-believers in the Creator of the Universe can find no other words to support their failing ideas than to invoke the name of that Creator?
littleann • October 21st, 2008 at 10:35 pm
I’m glad you’re posting these anecdotes. I went to my bullion dealer yesterday to see what gold/silver prices are. (I’m in NY). He said there is no silver below $15. He asked me jokingly if I wanted to sell any of mine. He can’t get gold without a huge premium as well. Is this our beloved gov’t. trying to limit hoarding by making it difficult to find bullion. I’m told the mint is not producing/selling any more bullion. Any thoughts besides deleveraging?
ptm • October 21st, 2008 at 10:56 pm
Let me see if I got this right.A) Using threats of financial collapse and martial law, George Bush pushes through an $850 billion or more bill that gives Paulson a blank check.B) 70% of the American people oppose the legislation.C) Paulson can’t decide how he wants to spend the money, but selects a favored few banks including his former investment bank.D) Now Paulson hires PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young to manage the deals, but guess what, the basic elements of the deals are shrouded in secrecy.http://bailoutsleuth.com/E) Today another $450 billion discount window opened.It’s one thing to intellectually understand what is happening to our country, but its a completely different to watch it unfold. We are so screwed.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:20 pm
Rsykamp,your an Ass, but hey everyone need asses(i meant that in a good way, really i do)imagine having bowel movements without an outlet to “let it out”
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:33 pm
Perhaps, the same “solutions” do not apply to “this bigger economy” because the IMF/World Bank is a vehicle for moving capital from the United States and other industrialized nations to underdeveloped nations, the very ones over which Marxists have always had the greater control. Says G. Edward Griffin, “They looked forward to the day we would pay their bills. It has come to pass.” The hidden agenda behind the IMF/World Bank is world socialism. Its current managing director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, is a Socialist/Communist. President of the World Bank is Robert Zoellick, former managing director of Goldman Sachs and a signatore of a letter drafted by the Project for a New American Century to President Clinton calling for “removing Saddam [Hussein]‘s regime from power.”The IMF/World Bank is patterned after the Federal Reserve System that allows American banks to create money out of nothing without paying the penalty of having their currencies devalued by other banks. Says Griffin, “It was the establishment of a world bank which would create a common fiat money for all nations and then require them to inflate together.” The IMF promotes monetary cooperation between nations by maintaining fixed exchange rates between their currencies. The World Bank makes loans. As PeterJB reports, graft runs as high as 60 percent.The IMF is funded on a quota basis by its member nations: the greatest share comes from the industrialized nations such as Great Britain, Japan, France and Germany, with the US contributing the most.One of the routine operations at the IMF is to exchange worthless currencies for dollars so the weaker countries can pay their international bills, often owed to investment bankers such as Goldman Sachs. This is supposed to cover “cash-flow” problems. According to Griffin, “It is a kind of international FDIC which rushes money to a country that has gone bankrupt so it can avoid devaluing its currency. The transactions are seldom paid back.”Harry Dexter White was America’s chief technical expert and the dominant force at the Bretton Woods Conference that established the IMF/World Bank. He eventually became the first Executive Director for the U.S. at the IMF. White was simultaneously a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and a member of a Communist espionage ring in Washington while he served as Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (See David Rees, “Harry Dexter White: A Study in Paradox,” 1973; and Whittaker Chambers, “Witness,” 1952).The goal of the IMF/World Bank as seen by co-authors White and Lord John Maynard Keynes is to create a world currency, a world central bank, and a mechanism to control the economies of all nations…the United States eventually is to be reduced to just one part of the collective whole.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:40 pm
I suspect it has been so silent because the deals are made in secrecy under the tables behind the doors.
Guest • October 21st, 2008 at 11:58 pm
The Sheriff refused to enforce evictions of RENTERS whose property was forclosed because the LANDLORD defaulted, and his primary disagreement was in cases where the renters had not recieved notice, or in some cases short notice of the eviction. He agreed to enforce evictions provided that there was better tenant notification.Neither blanket eviction or blanket ban of evictions is practical.
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:17 am
Remember back in July (the good old days) when Roubini outlined how austerity was going to level the American “way of life” in “ American Un-Beauty: The Crisis of the Suburbian (McMansions and Gas-Guzzling SUVs) Way of Life?”Well, here again is what our central bankers Bernanke and Paulson, assisted by Pelosi and Frank and Reid and Bush have in store for you and me as we, the people, are dunned for bailout mania of our billionaire plutocracy. According to Roubini (back in his good old days), the “suburbian American dream way of life is turning into an economic and financial nightmare…”Let us count the ways,” he said.Said Roubini: “[T]his bust of housing and this spike in oil and energy prices creates a severe economic and financial crisis that will radically change where and the way American live, work and play. On top of the ghost towns of the American West – the thousands of empty new homes in new suburbian and exurban developments in California, Nevada, Arizona, Florida and other states – you will have the decay of existing suburbian communities as millions of foreclosures will lead to the economic and social decay of existing towns: fiscal crises from the housing bust, municipalities defaulting, hundreds of empty and vandalized foreclosed homes in housing busted towns and communities, fall in public services, etc. The entire neighborhood goes when rows of foreclosed and vandalized homes reduce the value of remaining homes… crime; the entire social fabric…rotting to its core; Millions…lose homes and move to rented homes and apartments; leasing and rental will reduce the social benefits and community building associated with home ownership…“Next, cities and metropolitan areas will rethink their policies towards urban sprawl: greater public transportation, greater housing development closer to city and business/industry centers… greater urban density and concentration…“Moreover…much less discretionary spending: less dinners out of suburbian homes (more dining in rather than dining out), less movies and more TV watching, less socializing outside of the home (as parents put curfews on driving costs of teenage kids) and more socializing at home and over the internet (Facebook, MySpace, and even tax rebates spent on surging online porn traffic as cheap forms of home “entertainment”), less vacations in far flung location and more “staycations” (vacations staying at home).“In the short run this changing pattern of consumption will make the recession more severe through…a real economic/financial depression” because of falling home prices, risk of foreclosures, losses of jobs or concerns about losses of jobs, rising oil, energy and food prices, flat incomes and wages and now falling real incomes, high costs of health care and education, falling stock market wealth, high debt ratios (mortgages, credit cards, auto loans, student loans), high and rising debt servicing ratios (given reset of mortgages and consumer credit interest rates), concerns about globalization and offshore outsourcing and a general middle class malaise that is now hitting both blue collar workers and white collar workers, working classes as well as middle classes…“The Keynesian animal spirits will worsen in the short run the economic recession… with gasoline above $4 a gallon (it is down somewhat, but still terrible) we have “staycations” rather than real vacation, less trips to the mall (unless you need to stuff yourself on cheap Chinese goods at Wal-Mart), Nintendo/Playstation and internet home entertainment. And now with the Wii you don’t even need to go to the golf course or to the gym to exercise; you can play virtual golf or any sport from the comfy seat of your potato couch. America: welcome to the brave new and cheap world of virtual reality, virtual vacations and virtual entertainment and leisure.“So the biggest credit, housing, auto and asset boom and bubble in U.S. history is now cracking the suburbian “American Beauty” dream and turning it into an “American Ugly” nightmare…”Ah, so. All this, while Roubini supports more and more billions (now trillions) of taxpayer money to prevent “meltdown” of the same “financial system” that engineered this mess. Thanks Ben and Henry and Maestro Greenspan. And, most of all, thanks to Congress, who made it all possible.http://www.lse.co.uk/financeglossary.asp?searchTerm=&iArticleID=2493&definition=animal_spirits
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:47 am
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2008|SUDDEN DEBTFood And DrugsTwo charts from our “less commonly publicized economic data” Dept.· Americans receiving food stamp assistance rose to a record 29.05 million persons in July 2008 (latest data available). That’s 9% more than a year ago – and that’s before the credit crisis started hitting in earnest.· People are starting to cut back on drugs – the prescription kind. According to a NY Times article, the number of filled prescriptions has dropped for the first time in at least a decade.No more comments needed… Ok, just one: don’t bet on permagrowth in the medical services sector, either – ageing baby boomer effects notwithstanding.http://suddendebt.blogspot.com/
Martin • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:45 am
Alrightie folks listen up. We ain’t gonna talk about companies now. Its time we talk about countries.We are right now talking Argentina. Its Deja Vu all over again.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 2:07 am
yup,pension funds,its “amazing” the thing is not discussed in the US,wonder will bushie,BB and Hanks taps into US pension funds (they havent tap into that rite??!!)well i take it back its not amazing, nothing amazes me anymore
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:31 am
The big boys bought it all. Its gone.
Jason B • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:35 am
The US already spent the social security trust fund and the FDIC fund. The states will tap the pension funds.
Sppaajjjdd jjddd • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:35 am
George Bush cannot pay mortgage on White House. He is moving in with Cheney. Sleeping on the couch until he get back on his feet again.After being foreclosed, the White House is for sale but no takers. Is boarded up before the next president gets sworn in.The whole area goes downmarket. The white house becomes the crack house.Paulson /Bernanke inside selling rocks. Pimpin. Ho’s out front, they make much paper.
Lord Sidcup • October 22nd, 2008 at 3:39 am
“Don’t you think that the scenario of either Obama or MaCain ruling the World is mindboggling frightening?”Why is it more frightening than Clinton, GWB, Gordon Brown, Sarkozy, Putin being in charge?None of these puppets rule the world. They just work for the banks. As does the mainstream media. And the military.
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:36 am
This doesn’t sound as a good new.Especially because we are clearly in an escalation: lenders, small banks, broker dealers, large banks, very large financial companies, whole financial systems of small countries. What then?Martin, just curious, did you stockpile food and ammo?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:43 am
Alessandrodo you stock prayers??
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 22nd, 2008 at 4:50 am
Personally, I don’t do prayers, so “no”.
Stratonovich calculus • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:15 am
Emerging Market Bonds, Currencies Drop on Argentina ConcernOur friends just purchased a pied-à-terre in Buenos Aires’ recovering market. Wonder what this will do to the AR Peso.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:49 am
Jim Rogers on CNBC Europe this morningJim Rogers Oct 22 Governments Keep Making MistakesJim Rogers Oct 22 Inflation to Climb on Government InterventionJim Rogers Oct 22 Innocents Paying for Others’ Mistakes
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:16 am
<font color=”red”>Isn’t the issue of “money being debt” merely philosophical?It is not like the money printed by the Treasury HAS to be paid back to the Treasury.
Medic • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:16 am
Guest (by the way, a very brave thing to post without a name);1. As a “non-believer” (your term, not mine) I am not offended by using anyone’s name in whatever way I wish. If you are a Christian – prove it and forgive me.2. While JR’s post above is more clear than his usual posts, he still relies on such concepts as his “scrutiny” concept, which apparently can apply to housing, governments and anything else he can envision. He also continues to cite specific legal cases without much explanation which leaves his argument weak.3. Apparently, as a devout believer, you settle for weak arguments without proof and make that great leap of faith willingly. I’m happy for you. You will be lead until the day you die. Perhaps one day you will have the courage to trust in yourself and question what authority has told you. Unplug. It’s better when you know and don’t have to live in fear.O.K. I’m done with religious discussion on this board. Out of respect for my fellow posters who have as little interest in my particular beliefs as I do in theirs, I will refrain from further discussion of this personal topic.
kilgores • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:22 am
I found this Paul Solman interview on PBS last night with Nassim Taleb and mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot to be one of the most disturbing things I’ve run into in the past 12 months (old hat to some here, I’m sure):http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/redir/http://www-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2008/10/21/20081021_solman.mp3SWK
Lord Sidcup • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:24 am
Your conspiracy theory is nonsense. I don’t have time to pick through all the fallacies and angry delusions it is built on. Your first sentence is a lie. The following sentence contains dishonest slight of hand:”underdeveloped nations, the very ones over which Marxists have always had the greater control”.This makes it seem that underdeveloped nations are mostly Marxist.This is plainly bullshit. The poorest countries are not Marxist, the poorest countries are the ones that tried capitalism and got raped (strong word, but accurate) by the IMF on behalf of the rich west.You state “IMF/World Bank is world socialism”.Then”The IMF is funded on a quota basis by its member nations: the greatest share comes from the industrialized nations such as Great Britain, Japan, France and Germany, with the US contributing the most.”Eh.. yeah, all these nations are fervent supporters of Marxism and Communism.Good luck to you, You’re an idiot, though it won’t surprise when the us gov. / banks / declare war on the working poor as their economy dies around them.When this happens I expect you will still be bleating that it wasn’t the rich capitalist elites that created this, it was the socialists.
Capone • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:24 am
question is it better to know armageddon awaits the us or to be among the masses and part of the group / herd standing around going “oh my this is terrible.” “gee, i hope this bill fixes it.” i don’t know about you, but very few folks want to believe or hear the truth. outside of here, it is a somewhat lonely place knowing what is coming ultimately hyperinflationary depression when noone else believes or knows. maybe they can’t handle it. the hardest part is now that we are essentially proven correct since the market already crashed, the same people who ignored the 500 million warnings still do not want to hear about NOR acknowledge that you were right ! this reality has been VERY difficult to deal with personally where I work where I warned until i was blue in the face and $40 to $50 million + in losses later – they still don’t believe and they come nowhere near saying Gee this guy was right and asking what maybe next? i guess they have it all figured out OR just maybe they were not meant to have that money after all…
Gloomy • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:32 am
Oct. 22 (Bloomberg) — Investors are taking losses of up to 90 percent in the $1.2 trillion market for collateralized debt obligations tied to corporate credit as the failures of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Icelandic banks send shockwaves through the global financial system.The losses among banks, insurers and money managers may spark the next round of writedowns on CDOs after $660 billion in subprime-related losses. They may force lenders to post more reserves against losses after governments worldwide announced $3 trillion in financial-industry rescue packages since last month, according to Barclays Capital.“We’ll see the same problems we’ve seen in subprime,” said Alistair Milne, a professor in banking and finance at Cass Business School in London and a former U.K. Treasury economist. “Banks will take substantial markdowns.”
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:39 am
Roubini to guest host CNBC America today October 22, 2008 — for your information if you go to cnbc.com they offer a 7 day free trial for their cnbcplus live streaming service
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:40 am
sorry — starting at 8am today New York Time
ptm • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:48 am
Don not forget to include highway maintenance taxes (Congress slipped the gasoline tax into the general fund the same way it did the social security fund).
ptm • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:50 am
OR, do you see anything going on in Argentina from your perspective?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:52 am
hey, it is not any more corrupted than Washington.Washigton may be more accountable, though (perhaps).
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:54 am
In fact the block that looks worst off is…(drumroll please)…UNITEDSTATESOFAMERICAThus if something would fall apart, it would likely be the good ol’ US of A…(although some people would say “it will never do so”…mainly because of philosophical reasons)
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:10 am
Mayor Bloomberg: Economic crisis already costing New York $1.5 billion in lost taxeshttp://www.nydailynews.com/money/2008/10/21/2008-10-21_mayor_bloomberg_economic_crisis_already_.htmlyet in other newsIRS clears way for tax dollars to help new stadiums, arenashttp://www.nydailynews.com/money/2008/10/21/2008-10-21_irs_clears_way_for_tax_dollars_to_help_n.html
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:15 am
Bloomberg is campaigning to change the law so he can run for mayor a third term thereby setting him up for a 2012 presidential bid. They vote today whether or not to allow his change.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:17 am
If you missed it they will have lots of video clips on their site that they put up 60 to 90 minutes later. It’s great as the permabulls face off with superbear Roubini
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:25 am
New word – “stag-deflation” Roubini calls for $60 S&P earnings which translate @ a 12x multiple to S&P 700 or so.
ptm • October 22nd, 2008 at 7:44 am
It was a weird interview. These guys are the first I am aware that have called it the “worst economic event since the American Revolution.” Yet they really only had a gut (black swan) feeling to fall back on. The fact that these guys are well known, no, make that famous individuals that would not be prone to rash statements gives me pause.The crux of their argument seems to be “unknown” intricate relationships control by a relatively few large banks. So rather than stabilize our credit problem, they feel the Paulson bailouts are exacerbating the problems through unintended sneak paths in the economic system. MBS -> CDO -> Hedge Fund -> Fire Sale -> Asset Deflation -> Bank Credit?They did not say this, but they would probably agree that the dry shipment letter-of-credit squeeze is one of those sneak paths. And they feel that these types of problems will seep throughout the system, even to the point where Kroger cannot get its inventory shipped across country.
kilgores • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:01 am
Yes, it was weird, but something about it had the ring of truth to it. On the video version of the interview, Mandelbrot came across as somewhat less worried than Taleb, who appeared as if he was going to have a stroke. I suspect that while Mandelbrot recognizes the real possibility of the downturn becoming worse than the Great Depression, Taleb actually visualizes it and believes it to be closer than not to actualization.All of this sort of reminds me of Michael Crichton’s book, Jurassic Park, and its running theme of Chaos Theory. The scientists thought they had controlled dinosaur reproduction by creating only female dinosaurs. Because they used amphibian DNA to fill in the gaps in the genetic material they had extracted from the dinosaur blood taken from the prehistoric mosquitos preserved in amber, however, the female dinosaurs were able to switch sex, as amphibians are sometimes known to do in nature. The complexity of what they were doing made it difficult to anticipate this outcome, and everything went to hell in a handbasket.SWK
oller • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:06 am
Dear Professor:We all just saw you on CNBC. Throughing Pearls at the Swine! They are anesthesized! Excellent parting comment!The failure of economic policy has been an exercise in market fundamentalism. Pragmatic Skepticism would haveallowed us to navigate this economy!
dof • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:16 am
Thank-you Lord Sidcup.Until we identify the truth we’re all destined to drown in neoliberalism’s pool of obfuscations.THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE
Dan • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:29 am
Question to this site IT specialists:Is there away to add a sequence number for every next comment submitted?This would make it much easier to go to the latest comment (provided you remember the last one you read).
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:37 am
Here are links to the video clips of Roubini on CNBC this AMWed. Oct. 22 2008 | 8:05 AM[09:45 minutes]Wed. Oct. 22 2008 | 8:22 AM[03:45 minutes]Wed. Oct. 22 2008 | 8:31 AM[09:19 minutes]
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:40 am
And here is a link to Art Cashin’s comments this AM on CNBC – for traders his is a voice of wisdom:Art Cashin Oct 22
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:41 am
NO that’s wrong, he is refusing to evict those who default on mortgages. His EXCUSE is that the occupants MIGHT be renters, but he is using that excuse to refuse to execute ANY evictions for mortgage default, even for owner-occupants.
babb • October 22nd, 2008 at 8:59 am
A problem (a huge mass of foreign currency denominated loans) has built up over a long period. We want to solve it quickly, and without a loss to the borrowers, the banks, the taxpayers. It’s not possible.Even if loans are redenominated (it takes time…), the liability side will still be there with the self-reinforcing cycle: buy euro – repay debt – forint weakens – buy more euro at higher prices – repay more debt (not renewed) – …
Darkie • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:13 am
I’d like to see more about the end of BWII. There is a lot of talk and I’d like to see some analysis, especially along the lines of Sester’s recent post on the topic. Some of the comments are also interesting:http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/10/21/the-end-of-bretton-woods-2/
jomos • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:27 am
Notice the beautiful triangles forming in the charts? These generally break out with a continuation of the primary trend which is down.They are also classic wave 4 of Elliot wave theory.A,B,C,D and E of a contracting triangle.It looks like we are currently (9 AM Central time) approaching point D SP500 @ approx. 890.If correctly read,we will bounce off 890 approach 940 (point E) on Thursday or Friday.Breaking down and out of the triangle to a wave 5 low under 800 on the SP500.This will also be a signal for trades to reenter the market long for a month or two.
Darkie • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:30 am
I’d like to see more about the end of BWII. There is a lot of talk and I’d like to see some analysis, especially along the lines of Sester’s recent post on the topic. Some of the comments are also interesting:http://blogs.cfr.org/setser/2008/10/21/the-end-of-bretton-woods-2/
Free Tibet • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:31 am
Things are changing so fast none of us can keep up. In addition to the freight problems the fx markets are in disarray with many em currencies falling off a cliff. Imagine making a contract in which you wanted to hedge your fx exposure now.It looks like the Asian crisis of 10 yrs ago when Bahtulism spread through the region bringing what were considered well-to-do countries to their knees. Only it seems to have gone global.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:33 am
Dear Professor:You have allowed Rick Santelli to say the TABOO OF TABOOS! This is now a Banking Fascist State! I knowthat you are wise enough not to bandy about such a loaded word, and you prefer to soft-pedal by using socialist economy. The real truth is that the banks have perfected a Banking Fascist State and Santelli is livid! Let us not bull#@$%^ around with semantics anymore! This is a more SEVERE VERSION OF FASCISM than we have seen since the INSANITY OF THE INTERWAR PERIOD.This will end with global chaos again. This is Fascism!!!
randy • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:49 am
what happens to people that own an etrade account?
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:53 am
Hungary is only one of many prime candidates in the coming international economic meltdown: Pakistan, Argentina, Turkey, and many others will quickly become casualties. One of the most significant consequences of this economic crisis is the bursting of the commodity bubble. This will wreak havoc on developing countries that did not build substantial foreign currency reserves when times were good. Unfortunately, the IMF and G7 are too overwhelmed right now to address to the consequences of this.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:55 am
looks like morning panic is over.
MA • October 22nd, 2008 at 9:59 am
@ HloweIs that a reference to My august 8th post?”the dollar is on steroids”Just curious… If so, you really do thorough tracking.Miss America
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:20 am
NEW THREAD
Mark • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:37 am
Peter, great post. I’d add that the reason why we don’t see leadership with a solution is because there are no solutions, and those at the top either know this (and are just doing whatever they can, basically like you and I) or they are completely ignorant and actually believe that they can defy gravity (endless growth).We have to be our own leaders (working on concert with others).
Anonymous • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:41 am
Some hatred of Mr. Ryskamp! He may be touching some sensitive nerves …
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 10:56 am
Yes. Unfortunately I did not sell soonerI responded to your response to my message on 2008-10-17 12:57:28, for your personal amusement. Did you get it?hlowe
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 11:02 am
The dealer I use will received some from the mint next week.hlowe
Jim McCarney • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm
My understanding is that the 5% interest in the preferreds ratchets up to 10% after 3 to 5 years. Essentially, the US taxpayer is recapitalizing the financials’ balance sheets with rates that are 5% to 12% below market vis-a-vis risk. If that is the price for avoind financial armageddon, then maybe it is worth it. Nouriel receommended long ago that the central banks use capital to shore up the balance sheets. There are several other dilutive recommendations that really aren’t pragmatic, however.Nouriel stated on CNBC today that the probablity of financial armageddon is lower than it was two weeks ago and that, obviously, there are still very large systemic risks. The farce that is the practice that calculates “real” GDP in the US by subtracting the GDP deflator has overstated economic growth for sometime. I recall the deflator was in the 1% range in Q2 2008, when the real rate of inflations (not the CPI) was running at a 6% to 11% rate.I believe some of the instutitional research that I read that states the US recession started in Q1 2008. If Nouriel is right in predicting that this recesssion will last 24 months, this recession would last until the end of the year 2009.In the short term, Nouriel might be right. We might be looking at S&P 500 earings of $60, not the $85 analysts consensus estimate for 2009. He is also right that the last two recessions have been short (8 months) when compared to the average length of recession since the 1940′s (11 months).Since the 1940′s the average nadir has occurred close to the mid point of the respective recession. Our midpoint by these assumptions would be close to December 2008. The average market return for the 12 months after the nadir of the average recession is 40% plus since the 1940′s.Trying to sell long-term equities now is like steering your car after you already hit the brick wall. I’m slowly and selectively adding munis and corporates to portfolios. And I will be adding equities fairly soon.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 12:52 pm
The control bankers have over the world has always been absolute but only now in crisis can we see it in the open.
Guest • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:01 pm
I live on Lk St clair in Michigan and this past summer I saw a black swan several times even drove my boat upto within 20 feet of it, it’s not uncommon to have a 100 white swans in front of my house.
Brian • October 22nd, 2008 at 1:19 pm
Hi Martin,Nice to see you back and posting again!The blog has changed a bit since you were last here, but I’m all ears for anything you have to say.–Brian
Guest1 • October 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Anonymous: You are partially correct, he did place a moratorium on all evictions.http://www.cookcountysheriff.org/press_page/press_evictionSuspension_10_08_08.htmlAfter safeguards were added to the foreclosure process evictions resumed this past Monday. http://www.cookcountysheriff.org/press_page/press_evictionSuspension_10_08_08.htmlSo you are right, Chicago is still standing after a twelve day suspension of foreclosures when the average time to foreclose is four to six months. I’m pretty sure Ryskamp is looking for something a little more permanent.
János Weissmüller • October 22nd, 2008 at 6:19 pm
Well, then I might be in that 1%.I think the game is over for Hungary. The country has lived well above it’s possibilities. To much money has been borrowed and spent not on investments but daily pleasures.My guess is that Mr. Roubini has been invited by the Hungarian PM to give his advice. I can’t say that the Hungarian PM is a gentleman, because after Mr. Roubini has left, the PM has attributed such comments to Mr. Roubini, that he has never made. Mr. Gyurcsány says that Mr. Roubini blames the opposition for the current Hungarian financial crisis. Who can trust a man who says: “We lied in the morning, we lied in the evening and also at night.”Listen to Mr. Gyurcsány (translated) on this link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZGbz00n8-QThe words of PM Ferenc Gyurcsány:”There is not much choice. There is not, because we have screwed up. Not just a little, big time. No country in Europe has screwed up as much as we have.It can be explained. We have obviously lied for the past one and a half, two years. It was perfectly clear that what we were saying was not true. We are beyond the country’s possibilities to such an extent that we could not conceive earlier that a joint government of the Socialists and the liberals would ever do. And in the meantime we did not actually do anything for four years. Nothing! You cannot mention any significant government measures that we can be proudof, apart from the fact that in the end we managed to get governance out of the shit. Nothing! If we have to give an account to the country of what we have done in four years, what are we going to say?”
János Weissmüller • October 23rd, 2008 at 1:40 am
It’s payback time for Hungary. The keyword is STOP LOSS.
A German opinion • October 24th, 2008 at 3:40 am
How to prevent a financial crisis in Hungary that would lead to serious financial contagion in Emerging Europe?My point of view is: Hungary should drop out from the EMS2 and floating the forint. The country is to far away to join the euro currency area. The early floating prevents a potential currency crisis with its ugly outcome. The central bank dont have to fight againts it and can keep the interest rates down. A real devaluation of the forint should stimulat the exporting industries (Hungary is a typical “workbench” for the developed european countries)
Syndrum • October 26th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
for those that haven’t seen this docu, its a must see:www.zeitgeistmovie.comThe Addendum is a spot-on analysis of our current monetary order. However it not only criticizes our current system but also proposes an alternative. A resource based economy over a monetary one. It would be interesting to hear anyone’s ideas as to how feasible you think it could be…












