BBC Hardtalk Interview with Roubini: “US Bail-Out Special”
US bail-out special
In a HARD talk programme broadcast on 1 October, Stephen Sackur talks to economist Nouriel Roubini and journalist Oliver Kamm about the current economic crisis.
Click here to watch the full interview
The US House of Representatives’ rejection of a $700 billion plan aimed at bailing out Wall Street sent markets plummeting.
None of this is a surprise to critics like economist Professor Nouriel Roubini from New York University.
Roubini predicted the current crisis back in 2006.
He thinks US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s rescue package is too late — and furthermore, it’s “totally flawed”.
In a special programme, Professor Roubini joins Times columnist Oliver Kamm in the HardTalk studio.
Stephen Sackur asks them if we really are heading for another Great Depression.
HARDtalk is broadcast on BBC World News at 03:30 GMT, 08:30 GMT, 14:30 GMT, 20:30 GMT and 22:30 GMT
HARDtalk can also be seen on BBC News at 04:30 BST & 23:30 BST
217 Responses to “BBC Hardtalk Interview with Roubini: “US Bail-Out Special””
Brandon Cox • October 1st, 2008 at 6:26 pm
first?
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Second!
osgood binbettor • October 1st, 2008 at 6:33 pm
The Public Debt hit $10 trillion on 9/30, an increase of $3.8 bil in Sept.
virtualco • October 1st, 2008 at 6:33 pm
and third
DueLarMah • October 1st, 2008 at 6:59 pm
if is is a money matter, why dont make it at $700 T?
Anonymous • October 1st, 2008 at 7:12 pm
Can you please upload the BBC interview in a format that works on Windows? Thanks
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 7:13 pm
欠債老漢殺妻自盡而在美國波士頓,六十一歲資訊科技顧問莫根森周日晚將妻子槍殺後打電話報警,說自己準備自殺。警方其後在他們的住所發現兩人屍體。莫根森吞槍自殺之前不久,曾於個人網頁宣布他和妻子已死。調查指二人生前有財政困難,欠下約四萬三千港元房租,已被房東下令遷走,另外莫根森亦欠下約二十二萬港元消費債項。
subgenius • October 1st, 2008 at 7:35 pm
PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTFor all those using M$ Windoze and unwilling to install the nightmare POS that is RealPlayer, might I direct you to this:http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/Real_Alternative/1054136293/1/It is a freeware codec bundled with Media Player Classic (needed as the codec doesn’t support streaming on Windows Media Player – though it will support local ram files…the link at the head of this article is to open a stream)
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 7:45 pm
“Paulson Bank Rescue Proposal Is `Crazy,’ O’Neill Says “it is not crazy enough. It should be $700 T.
Anonymous • October 1st, 2008 at 7:48 pm
For those that don’t have Real Player installed try this link: http://tinyurl.com/4lf368
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Senate vote on Bailout: 74 Yes, 25 No
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Thank you, subgenius. I can watch it now, although the video is almost too small to see.
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 9:09 pm
VODKA LOTS OF IT
AfA • October 1st, 2008 at 9:23 pm
You are being TARP’d,They are being TARPaulined
Wolf in the Wilds • October 1st, 2008 at 9:23 pm
A tax cut after increasing debt by US$700b???!?! What the hell are these people thinking about?I am afraid this spells the end of the US of A. It shows that the leadership in the US has absolutely no courage to make the right decisions. The world will be dragged down by the incompetence of the Americans.
AfA • October 1st, 2008 at 9:30 pm
I find the argument that paying over-inflated prices to worthless papers fundamentally flawed.If Treasury overpays to banks, the asset side of banks’ balance sheets will inflate, and with current equity valuation, this will instantaneously increase their real-market leverage, unless they raise equity (recap) or their stock prices go up quickly.
Anonymous • October 1st, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Sorry I don’t download and run executable code from unknown publishers because of security concerns. Please give me standard windows media player format. Thank you.
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 9:53 pm
Well, looks like the media finally got one thing right.News … Wednesday night:”The White House and congressional leaders already have made up their minds. Confronted with the defeat of an earlier measure in the House this week and increasingly urgent warnings of economic hardship, they’ve begun rounding up votes the old-fashioned way…. They’re buying them.”So this is what it boils down to.Most of our Congressmen and Senators have no idea how the US economy even works. And in a state of fear and confusion – they go back to the one thing that always talks in politics … money.PeteCA
AfA • October 1st, 2008 at 9:57 pm
So sad
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 10:00 pm
What are we going to do about this? Are we just sitting idly by and letting it all happen? Now our servitude to the top 1% is obvious and there is only a very thin veneer of democracy. What are we going to do?
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Here is a really good basic article from Fortune magazine on credit default swaps (CDS). Any Americans who are reading this blog and don’t understand the big problem with CDS – should really take the time to read and understand this.http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/30/magazines/fortune/varchaver_derivatives_short.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008093012I remain convinced that if most Americans really understood what has transpired with this greedy, sordid CDS mess … then they would probably all grab crowbars and go down to Wall St to take apart the big banks. Our entire financial system has been run by a bunch of overpaid cowboys. And now the Head Cowboy wants a $700 billion handout so his buddies can buy new ponies and go on another big roundup.PeteCA
Wolf in the Wilds • October 1st, 2008 at 10:01 pm
Yes, and in the process, doom generations of Americans to debt servitude. I had hope on Monday. Not anymore. Now its up to the world to cut off the gangreneous arm that is the USA. I expect massive liquidation of USD financial assets in the next 12 months, massive hyperinflation in the US, precipitious drop in the USD and a global financial crisis morphing into a global economic and geopolitical crisis. There is nothing more to say. The die is cast. All we can do is watch the play act out.I feel sorry for the Americans and their future generations. It is ironic that your country should fail because of the corrupt few.
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 10:07 pm
Chris Laird had some interesting comments in his commentary today …http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/30/magazines/fortune/varchaver_derivatives_short.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008093012Please note the final words from this article. And I quote:”There is one more problem worth noting. We are just entering a stage of bank runs. What happened with the 5 EU banks bailed out this week, and then the failures of all the investment banks and banks/institutions in the US in the last two weeks were bank runs. I am quite concerned that a wave of these in the US and the EU can lead to a failure or interruption of credit cards and ATMs and debit cards.So, not only do people have to accumulate cash in general and sell investments, but also they will start to need actual cash in hand. I think everyone should be stocking a month or so of cash, just in case they need to pay some bills, buy gas (have you noticed big gas stations not accepting credit or plastic money?).”This is exactly the advice I was giving people on this blog last week. It is getting important for Americans to have some emergency cash on hand, some basic food & water put away, and the gas tank in their car at least half full. Congress and the US economy can go into the toilet. But we’ve all got to take care of our families and our kids. I’m not saying everyone should make a run on the bank or the gas station. No need for panic. But it does pay to be a bit more self-reliant right now.PeteCA
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 10:14 pm
Wolf. Always good to hear from you. Yes, I’m afraid some really hard times are coming to America. A few weeks ago, someone on this blog said that this whole mess would not end in America until everyone hated equities and everyone hated the banks. Well … we’re taking a big step in that direction this week.PeteCA
Ralph • October 1st, 2008 at 10:22 pm
Thanks a lot!
Math • October 1st, 2008 at 10:28 pm
Asian Stocks Fall After U.S. Senate Passes Rescue Package; Toyota Drops – bloomberg
Nedhead • October 1st, 2008 at 11:40 pm
Were done.USA. The population only cares about who the next American Idol is. We can’t communicate with each other because of all the different languages. Education in this country failed years ago. Consumer credit with weak education spells disaster. 8 years of blind spending in a religious war while playing the fiddle. Nero had it this good. All we need now is a match to light the candles when the power goes out. Good luck everyone.
Guest • October 1st, 2008 at 11:45 pm
candles, oh shit, what candles?
BBH • October 1st, 2008 at 11:50 pm
Oh this is real bad. I am sorry to hear this terrible news. Dont worry Bush will bail you guys out too.
subgenius • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:06 am
From:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/02/washington/02voters.html?ref=us “My calls are still running 10 to 1 against the bailout, which sounds like a lot and is a lot,” said Representative Jason Altmire, Democrat of Pennsylvania, who voted no on Monday. “But before the vote, it was 30 to 1. After the vote, especially that afternoon as the market fell, our calls were about 50-50.”Mr. Altmire said many of his constituents were outraged that tax dollars would be put at risk to stabilize financial firms run by wealthy executives. He said he had not yet decided whether to switch his vote to yes when the House votes again on Friday, though he does support a provision added by the Senate to increase to $250,000 the limit for bank deposits that are federally insured.So, what this F***wad is saying is that at 98% against, he’ll vote no, but at 90% against he might go with the yes…..We’re f***ed
Poorsaver • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:45 am
Indeed. A sad day, and week for America. When the history books are written, this will surely be included in the chapter titled “The fall of the American Empire”.
P1AQL • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:11 am
Reposting from earlier thread …Folks,Even people like Hussman are incorrect in requesting a super bond. What’s great for Buffet isn’t great for the US. See http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc080929.htmHere's why.First, Suppose the intrinsic value of the questionable assets is 4 ie the haircut is a 20% net default amount rate after all recoveries. Then Treasury will pay 4 as against the absurd market value of 2. The balance sheet will look like this.Good Assets: $95Cash Proceeds from Sale of Questionable Assets to Treasury: $4TOTAL ASSETS: $99Liabilities to Customers: $80Debt to Bondholders: $17Shareholder Equity: $2TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER EQUITY: $99Now we have liquified the questionable assets into $4 of Cash!! , injected equity into the thin equity capital base and stopped the customer bank run. With the bank run stopped, the CDS spread will fall giving confidence to bond holders.Second, using a super bond as Hussman suggests is flawed. Putting anything senior to the bonds will change the rules of the game for bond holders who will never subscribe to the companies bonds again. It will be the equivalent of default and will result in a breakdown of trust since future bond holders will always worry that Uncle Sam might step on their toes with a super bond again later.That’s why the Paulson proposal was perfect.Hopefully, the Republicans will stop their free market dogma and prevent Uncle Sam from cutting off his nose.Best,Print First Ask Questions Later aka P1AQL.
Red Smales • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:41 am
I’m thrilled Mr. Buffet is optimistic. I’d love to meet some of those productive American workers he’s bragging about. The candidates I interview are more concerned with listening to their i pods and straightening out their truckers’ caps than actually producing labor. We are all free to labor at their game. Maybe Warren can buy some preferred stock in our other great freedom: starvation. The RFC of the Great Depression is the Phoenix.
Wolf in the Wilds • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:45 am
What makes you think the trust is not broken? Paulson’s solutions puts the cost of the bailout on the taxpayer. Why not just exchange equity for the distressed debt? Set a cheap price of 20c to the USD. The bank gets deleveraged and recapitalised simultaneously. Get all Tier 1, 50% of tier 2 and 25% of Senior debt holders converted to equity. All of a sudden there is a lot of capital available to lend from. Risk bearers have to bear to costs of bad decisions. Otherwise, there is no point having a market, any market. And generations of Americans will pay the price.
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:21 am
P1AQL,you as many others are proposing ways to turn lead into gold.I’ve got a news flash for you: it ain’t work.
Oliver • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:37 am
I’ve got a question. Since the discount window has been opened wide, extended to non-commercial banks, and the Fed’s been offering clean assets in exchange for toxicity, I presume this is exactly the oil required to grease the economy. I imagine lot’s of money has been accepted by these financial institutions. What are these institutions doing with this cash or near cash because I keep hearing the wheels aren’t being greased? Now they need another $700b.I see credit as a bank’s production line. Suppose oil companies stop producing oil because they run out of cash because they invested badly and their balance sheet looks bad and their share price has tanked and short sellers are killing them. Now suppose they are given cash and production still isn’t switched on. Am I being naive, or is the Fed cash being used elsewhere instead of making credit available? I know that credit is all about trust and stuff like that, but I’d just like to know one thing – Where’s the Fed’s cash gone?!I personally see commercial banks as utilities. They earn income from credit spreads and fees and if their investments go sour, they come home to mama, the Fed, and ask for assistance. Note also they really should track fairly close to GDP indicating that there is no reason for these executives to make obscene salaries. They’re not bearing excessive risk in exchange if they can always come crying to the Fed!!! My personal take on all this is that they are using the Fed money to fund the mother of buying opportunities rather than grease the wheels of credit markets. Information is asymmetric and the commercial banks have it in spades. As long as the Fed and taxpayer keep paying, they’ll keep accepting.I’ll ask again, where is the money going??
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:19 am
P1AQL from previous thread:
Outerbeltway and Alessandro , I gotta hand it to ya! Looks like you pulled the rope and ended up in the abyss!See http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/30/autos/car_dealer_pain/index.htm?postversion=2008100115If you want to see how America’s credit crisis is hitting the streets of your hometown, go to your local car dealer.Now that you’re in the abyss, it’ll be easier for us with the Yea vote to pull the rope back up!Enjoy the fishies down there!
So what? Have you ever heard of the possibility to actually PAY for something you BUY? This is what that “cold and hard cash” thingy is supposed to be used for.Guess what, when I’ll buy my next car I’ll pay for it cash. And I’ll pay less than today. And I’m waiting because I don’t need no fancy new car right now and I know the more I wait the better the car I’ll purchase with the same amount of cash.The credit crunch hits those who are in debt and those who financed them. Prudent savers will actually profit from the credit crunch as long as civilization doesn’t come to an end, which I don’t expect. Think Warren Buffet as a prudent saver (and a crook, but thats another story).
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:20 am
[ouch! repost]P1AQL from previous thread:
Outerbeltway and Alessandro , I gotta hand it to ya! Looks like you pulled the rope and ended up in the abyss!See http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/30/autos/car_dealer_pain/index.htm?postversion=2008100115If you want to see how America’s credit crisis is hitting the streets of your hometown, go to your local car dealer.Now that you’re in the abyss, it’ll be easier for us with the Yea vote to pull the rope back up!Enjoy the fishies down there!
So what? Have you ever heard of the possibility to actually PAY for something you BUY? This is what that “cold and hard cash” thingy is supposed to be used for.Guess what, when I’ll buy my next car I’ll pay for it cash. And I’ll pay less than today. And I’m waiting because I don’t need no fancy new car right now and I know the more I wait the better the car I’ll purchase with the same amount of cash.The credit crunch hits those who are in debt and those who financed them. Prudent savers will actually profit from the credit crunch as long as civilization doesn’t come to an end, which I don’t expect. Think Warren Buffet as a prudent saver (and a crook, but thats another story).
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:26 am
People here, including me, are speculating that the Paulson Plan is really a rescue package for the FED who will be able to unload all the crap in its books to the Treasury/taxpayer/foreign-central-banks.The FED has attempted to bail out Wall Street, going broke in the process.Now the US is attempting to bail out the FED. I let you guess he result I expect.
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:35 am
You Americans must now know that YOU don’t count!And, that your “leadership” betrays you and has sold you, your children and your grandchildren.So much for your “Democracy” – and you export this? No wonder all the countries you try to sell it to, take up arms…Learn your lessons.Ho hum
Mark • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:56 am
Hi folks. I’ve been wondering… Is it possible that what we’re seeing boils down to a battle between pensions and our children’s future?I kind of liken this to the recent UAW contracts that fought to retain retirement benefits and conceded a wage cut for new hires. Who would retirees sell their homes to? Not to the folks whose wages were compromised.There’s clearly a lack of balance being pushed. But this will come back in a vengeance. Blowback looms.
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:57 am
For what it is worth, that is also how I buy my cars – I pay less than $5000 for cars worth $40,000 usually (I look for top value – the wealthy discarding their trash [hah] – but now I am looking for a particular car worth $150,000 and I got near one the other day for $4500 – he was desperate but I said $3500.Oh, did I mention that I pay cash too.It is called price discovery:-) Screw Paulson and his ilk!Vivre la revolution
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:09 am
“Ambrose Evans-Pritchard says it is ironic that European banks have turned out to be deeper in debt than their US counterparts. “http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/3118994/Financial-Crisis-So-much-for-tirades-against-American-greed.htmlNothing ironic about it at all – as I have posted here a number of times, it was clear 20 years ago that most European banks were technically bankrupt. … Then, there was friend Greenspan.Friends, what you are seeing is a trend – downwards, where the edge of the waterfall nears.It is a “leadership” crisis brought about by incompetence and stupidity (I will also add, desperation, treason and cowardice) er, did I mention “fear”.This lot have had their day; let them begone.Vivre la revolution
Mark • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:17 am
More word from the front, from reality:http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aZ31Ile1XeMk&refer=homeProducer Prices Pinched By Most Since 1975 vs CPI: Chart of DayBy Lee J. Miller and Marco BabicOct. 2 (Bloomberg) — U.S. manufacturers, squeezed by a credit crunch and sagging consumer confidence, are left with stark choices on job cuts and buying new equipment, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.“Profit margins have been slipping for some time and business is increasingly sensitive to downside shocks,” said Bruce Kasman, chief economist at JPMorgan. Even if Congress passes a comprehensive aid package for banks, “spending and hiring cutbacks will intensify.”The CHART OF THE DAY compares the so-called core producer price index, which excludes fuel and food, with the counterpart for consumer prices. PPI accelerated faster than CPI in August by the widest since 1975, signaling the inability or reluctance of manufacturers to pass along costs to customers.Another indicator that illustrates the margin squeeze is the quarterly price deflator for non-farm businesses, though figures have only been released for the April to June period, Kasman said by e-mail.“We look for U.S. businesses to pull back in the coming two quarters, with investment spending expected to reverse course at an 8 percent annualized pace,” Kasman said. “We also expect payroll losses to average 150,000 per month over this period, double the pace thus far this year.”The job cuts, along with “a sustained period of below-trend global growth,” will reduce some need for new plants and equipment, as utilization of existing factories will probably decline, he said.
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:26 am
ER, anybody watching the Alt-A’s?Vivre la revolution
curious • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:33 am
I guess the question is “Can artificial pricing stop a classic debt deflation? or must we inevitably allow fully disclosed market pricing to find its natural level? It may be a matter of degree in the velocity and depth of recession and speed of recovery. The reason no one has trust or faith in the market approach is we have been burned so many times by lack of transparency, fraud, and fallacious/artificial prices. We now have placed our bet it seems on tricking/gaming the natural price mechanism. This is not a good bet.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:35 am
The irony is that the “standard” format for ram files (Real Player) is loaded with bloatware and spyware. Your best bet IMHO is the Real Alternative, but do as you wish.
James • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:55 am
Thank you, PeteCA! Nice article.Google is having their 10th anniversary, so they created a link for searching websites from 2001. It’s interesting to see how differently people saw CDSs back then. For instance, I found this from a CDS salesman about how to create “synthetic assets”. They were all the rage!
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:18 am
Bingo!
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:22 am
You want to get a $150.000 car for $3.500? You’ve got to teach me something, man!
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:26 am
FFR back to 1,15% (2% target). Apparently the FED taking back the control of the FFR lasted exactly one day.BTW, they are resisting to cut the rates, but can’t hold it much longer, be prepared for a surprise rate cut sometime soon. My best guess is shortly after the bailout bill is definitely passed.MA? Your call?
Anonymous • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:58 am
Thanks for setting up the link. Why any website who wants return traffic would use realplayer is beyond me.
Jose Spenceros • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:00 am
Here is where the money is going:http://market-ticker.denninger.net/archives/596-The-TRUTH-About-The-Bailout.htmlIt appears the money is going to foreign banks so they don’t pull the plug on us and call in their debt that we can’t pay. This is basically just “delay” money. It is being used to quell our nervous creditors and possibly pave the way for another round of borrowing by saying, “See, you can lend us even more money, we’re good for it. At least we can stick it to our population and they hardly ask why, so don’t worry, we’ll pay you back.”Also, the Heads of State are very scared that foreign banks will stop using the dollar in favor of another currency. A worldwide liquidation of the dollar would be catastrophic for the US and they know it. But that is exacty where we are. You know, Iraq threatened to switch currency and we brought them “democracy.” Bush and Paulson are very afraid that the “oil countries” might switch currencies, and among other fallout, drive up the price of gas to free market levels. Obviously, this would not be good for our “public servants.”Cancer seems less insideous than good ole Hank.
Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/ • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:20 am
Actually, in this interpretation money is not going anywhere. The FED, Wall Street, foreign central banks are just swapping illiquid (crap) assets for newly issued Treasuries. So it’s really just a record-shattering balance sheet swap game.Obviously the whole idea is that the Treasury will overpay for the bad assets, giving everybody except the taxpayer a free lunch.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:25 am
Here’s an idea let the Government take into recievership all of the big banks including Federal Reserve and run it like the post office. This would be more democratic than the facism we had before. Fractional Reserve Banking is a pyramid scheme where the wealthy get wealthier by charging interest on ficticous created money a whole industry is created where ceos and management make billions in salaries by working credit spreads off of illusionary money supply. My argument is that all of that interest paid and spread money should go back to the tax payer via government collection. This would not be socialism in any way but without sound money if we continue the practice of Fractional Reserve lending then the profits should be going to the Government/tax payer not private investors/shareholders and bankers who prove to abuse the system. It’s the biggest welath generating scam ever and if we continue the scam atleast put it into the hands of taxpayers. If anything privatize the post office but nationalize the banks.
oller • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:26 am
The “Hard Talk” discussion was extremely enlightening!The Professor’s answer to the moderator that the the banking system has an inherent fragilityof leverage and borrowing short to lend long is the key to shut down any argument that regulationshould not be stringent! Banking is Alchemy and should be extremely regulated in the digital age!I hope the professor posts the answer he was just about to give before the show was cut off!The other gentleman made an assertion that the rest of the world has no choice but to followthe International American Economic Supremacy because it provides “public goods” i.e security, reserve currency, etc.) I have a feeling the professor was about to say something profoundabout that assumption!
villager • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:29 am
Another excellent interview, Professor. It was evident in this interview that when the question was posed in a negative context, the Professor did not fall into the trap of making a similarly negative response. (He is labelled “Dr. Doom” unfairly.) Instead he spoke about what needed to be done. This is the positive approach to addressing the dire financial/economic situation. He did not get drawn into the ‘politics’ and the ‘ideological’ but referred to the ‘practical’. It takes skill, practice and patience to respond as Dr. Roubini did. He has made much effort to enlighten the public.
villager • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:43 am
Re “Is it possible that what we’re seeing boils down to a battle between pensions and our children’s future?” … Yes. And, the “battle” involves not just the economy but also about the planet – what is the environmental future of subsequent generations.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:00 am
Yes I would like to know the professor’s idea of how he thinks the Bretton Woods2 agreement could break down how would it transpire?
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:03 am
JamesCDS would haqve made complete sense, and been perfectly workable, if they had kept the market to a few sensible restrictions. All they really needed to do was to limit the purchase of CDS contracts to those people who were actual bond holders. That’s all. Anyone who held bonds could purchase the insurance (assuming they could find a seller). The whole CDS market exploded and became a casino operation when they allowed third parties with no tangible interest to start using CDS contracts for profitable gain. Just my opinion.PeteCA
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:16 am
To bad the debate was cut off at the most interesting moment (decline or no decline of the US).It seems that some pundits believe the US economy will resurect simply because it is to big to fail. It would be interesting if you could analyse further the pros and cons of a resurection of the US. What are the arguments on both sides.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:38 am
thanks for your reply previously…just 1 more thing, cant the central bankers jsut sell the dollar denominated debt for cash, with rates falling to 0%, surely the rates wont spike..mrskeptical
Realist • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:40 am
Great comment!!That is exactly what I was thinking. He should be re-named Dr Reality check. I am getting sick and tired of people labelling this guy Dr Doom. It’s funny how people are starting to listen to him now. The Western world is in a state of denial and has been for a very long time, especially the United States and UK. The shift of economic power is changing before our very eyes and there is nothing short of a war that will stop it. Maybe that is next on the cards?! Even this idiot ex hedge fund manager is in denial with regards to the dollar and its demise as the worlds reserve currency. As for the revised Paulson plan, well guess what? YOU CANT POLISH A TURD
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:50 am
Best humor of the day. From the “Jack FM” radio show this morning in America:”So if we don’t have any money in savings, or own any stocks, then we’re good, right?”PeteCA
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:12 am
I don’t see it being “Money AND cut”… I see it being: “money OR cut”Miss America
Little Saver • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:14 am
Ask Paulson for help, he’s the right man to bring you there.
oller • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:14 am
I think that Congress is so spooked because theywere briefed that Bretton Woods 2 would break apartwithout the Bailout! Whether it is true or Paulson/Bernankeplaying games, they bought it! They look like Deerin the headlights!What do you say professor?
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:15 am
Someone please answer these 3 questions about oil.1. What was the peak price?2. What was the peak closing price?3. What is the current 30 day price range on oil?Miss America
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:17 am
Dow down over 300 now! I find it amazing that the senate could ballon a $700 Billion bill by over $100 Billion in just a couple of days! You want inflation? The original proposal was 3 pages, the house version was 116 pages, the version passed last night was over 400 pages!! Just goes to show you that you don’t have to search deep to see why things are out of control…
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 am
We are clearly headed for a disaster…”rescue” plan? Hell, it should be called teh gasoline bill…11:15 a.m.Rep. Frank: thinks enough votes in House to pass rescue plan
OuterBeltway • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:23 am
P1AQL: you say the Paulson plan is “perfect”. Those are your words.I say it’s a bad plan, worse than worthless. It does harm. Here’s why:a. It buys stricken assets at 80 cents on the dollar (according to P1AQL). Those assets have recently sold for 22 cents on the dollar (Merrill Lynch, May 2008).b. It puts scarce capital back into the hands of the gang that couldn’t shoot straight.c. It diverts resources away from the productive segments of the economyd. It increases the nation’s debt by another 8% at a time when our borrowing costs are about to skyrocket (they certainly can’t get any lower)In an earlier post, you suggested that denying Wall Street their extortion money caused the reduction in sales of U.S. autos.If indeed that is the case, why aren’t you agitating for an injection of money directly into the automakers, which is at least a component of the real economy? Instead, you advocate pouring an additional $700B down the Wall Street rathole. None of the $200B we’ve recently given Wall Street has made it into the real economy. Why would this next $700B be different?The geniuses on Wall Street blew a bubble, and had significant exposure to the pumped-up assets they were pawning off on everyone else. Due to their own miscalculation, the bubble popped before they could unload all the junk on the rubes. The bailout is another trick-the-dopes ruse, and the entire nation understands this perfectly.The core problem remains: the real economy is under-resourced in critical areas, and every dime of available capital needs to be programmed toward rebuilding an economy that can cope with globalization and resource re-pricing (energy and raw materials).
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:30 am
jobless claims up to 497,000, continuing claims set ne record, ISM biggest drop in 24 years, factory orders plunge…oh yeah, I forgto, “the fundiMENTALS of the US economy are strong”…IDIOTS ARE NOW RUNNING THE US ASSYLUM!
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:36 am
THEY ARE GOING TO PASS IT EVEN THOUGH THE MAJORITY OF CITIZENS SAYS “NO”!!!!11:33 a.m.New bailout bill looks better to House members: Rep. Frank
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:36 am
Don’t worry, it’s more – a total of $840 trillion with the sweeteners.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:37 am
Don’t change a winning team! That’s Paulson plan purpose.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:39 am
11:37 a.m. SEC extends short-sale ban to Oct. 17Bottom in for the day on this news…
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:40 am
11:37 a.m.SEC backs down on short-selling disclosure rule, extends ban
bcdogs • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:43 am
Unfortunately at the moment, the cowards biggest concern seems to be getting this thing pushed through and getting home to get reelected, dam the torpedos, straight ahead. Of course perhaps cowards isn’t the right descriptor, perhaps they are just total and complete idiots (or a combination of). The fact that they didn’t bring in any economists to talk to them, the fact that they brought in Warren Buffet, the lack of transparency in this whole thing. The lack of much more than sound bites and fear tactics used by the media remind me so much of the lead up to the war in Iraq…the parallels are astounding…of course the only bad, doctored intelligence will end up being the financial institutions asset side.I am basically a political junkie and it is really disheartening if you go to open secrets.org and do some research on your elected officials, they are basically all OWNED by the financial industry. I’m willing to bet that each and everyone of the yes votes have their top industry sector donations from the financial industry, probably even the nos…Haven’t looked lately at the pres election, but back during primaries they were top sector donating – now I know why…
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:44 am
I wonder why the USD is up over 1% this moment.Manipulation?
bcdogs • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:48 am
The amount of money donated by the financial sector to these jerks is mind boggling…http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/indus.php?ind=F&goButt2.x=8&goButt2.y=7&goButt2=Submit
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:49 am
Stocks rallying back here…they have to price in a recession now, earnings estimates are still far too high and on an inflation adjusted basis, the S&P is sitll sporting a PE of 19…no bull market has ever started from these levels!
tutterfrut • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:51 am
First tell us what we can win!
bcdogs • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:51 am
Isn’t it all about assumptions?PeteCA thanks for the link, someone here directed me to utube Khanacademy has some great videos up explaining CDOs, CDS and the bailout plan…It’s a shame so many people are not more intellectually curious and involved in this whole process. Unfortunately the only thing that will prompt them is probably loss…
tutterfrut • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:54 am
But hey, we’re for a strong dollar!
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:56 am
err … PeterJB, we should say:Vive la Révolution!:)
OuterBeltway • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:56 am
P1AQL: here’s your chance.Please explain how buying $700B in stricken assets from Wall Street banks at four times their value is going to address the problems set out above.I hopeful that you can name the section of the Paulson’s “perfect” Bailout Bill that describes how that $700B is going to find its way into the real economy.Please cite the relevant section of the bill. No hand-waving or generalities.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 10:56 am
11:55 a.m. Bush: Mortgage rescue plan best way to revive bank lending11:55 a.m. Bush urges House to pass mortgage purchase plan
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:01 am
12:00 p.m.Commercial paper in record drop as more firms purged from market
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:02 am
俄羅斯總統梅德韋傑夫在聖彼得堡大學演說時表示,全球金融危機顯示,美國經濟一統天下,以「一個經濟、一個貨幣」主導全球經濟的時期已經結束。他呼籲建立新的以及更合理的金融體系。
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:06 am
RUSSIA IS ASKING FOR SETTING UP A NEW FINANCIAL SYSTEM TO REPLACE US FINANCIAL SYSTEM AND US CURRENCY.
bcdogs • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:06 am
What I don’t understand is no media outlet on TV is talking about Defazio’s no bailout plan which seems infinitely better than the one that will likely pass.http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/09/bailout_alternative_offered_ho.htmlTo add insult to injury I have seen pictures of these courageous congress critters pasted on to articles that have nothing to do with the press conference that they gave….Again, this reminds me to the lead up the war in Iraq…
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:06 am
Hey King TuttNo prize for you… just an ego boost for me.I’ll give you the answers:1. Peak = $147.552. Peak close = $145.293. 30 day trade range = $92 – $110I say this because I’d like to refer back to my post from June 10th.“Now, at the beginning of hurricane season… at the beginning of USA/EU summer time when consumption of oil peaks… when Morgan Stanley is calling for $150 oil… and GS ups the odds for $200 oil… I’m putting my RGE reputation on the line again! I truly believe oil will make a rapid decent to the $96-110 range! …and in the event of a flare up I don’t picture oil breaking $145.”Miss AmericaI truly do miss America… but I don’t miss with my forecasts!
Mother of God • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:07 am
Could you please rephrase that last sentence, Pete? Could you please demand the RICH to finally become the least teeny-tinsiest little bit self-reliant?? Just how many palaces and luxuries do we poor “useless eaters” have to give to the gigarich from our meager paychecks, before we get credit for having been the only ones who have always been the self-reliant??!!Sometimes I get the feeling folks on this board are not even aware that for some of us – who came here trying to understand the details of this particular crisis and bailout – there is no such thing as cash-for-a-month put aside! Sometimes I think those who haven’t been totally robbed yet, don’t know that we who were totally robbed already, even exist…
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:08 am
But, if you roll it in sugar, you can fool some people to believing it is a donut!
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:11 am
I guess I’m dense – your point?
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:12 am
The other main thing is that paying inflated prices for toxic waste DOES NOT recapitalize banks. Cash or treasuries (received for toxic waste) is not equity. It maybe possible that the BOOK value of equity will go up but not market value. It will depend on what banks would do with the “profits”. Either pay dividends (and shareholders will officially be bailed out on the back of taxpayers), Retained earning (and party recapitalize with the hope that not distributing dividends would not put stocks under more pressure), or Relend (by maintaining their ridiculous leverage ratios). For the 2 latter options a mere $700B is a drop in the sea.
Mother of God • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:14 am
I am never going to understand why even people who appear to grok what’s really going on, continue to ascribe the situation to things like cowardice and idiocy, ineptitude and stupidity.The very damn reason we can’t win this freaking fight is because people just will not call it like it is:THE PEOPLE DOING THIS HAVE CONSCIOUS INTENT AND ARE CARRYING OUT PREMEDITATED PLANNING, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. WHY DOES NO ONE SAY THIS PLAINLY???
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:18 am
12:14 p.m.Greece will guarantee all bank deposits: report
Nedhead • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:21 am
Really enjoyed the Olympics.
K in TX • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:22 am
I’m good with nationalizing the banks and healthcare too. Maybe the “profit” from one could help pay for the other.It appears that neither pure socialism, nor pure capitalism are effective systems. The question becomes what resources and services are so crucial that they should be held by the public for the public, and which resources and services may be safely privatized.And why not privatize the post office…there are other shippers in competition. The post office mainly has a monopoly on junk mail.
MOTH-ER OF GOD! • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:26 am
I want to hear you walk into the nursing home where I visit lonely patients, and try to sell this idea that america’s got a stupid and lazy workforce. tell it to the underpaid caregiver who is cleaning up somebody’s grandfather’s shit-soaked sheets, and comforting him for his terrible embarrassment to his dignity at the same time!i-pods and truckers caps, indeed!how come when organized labor goes out on strike the batons come down on our heads, but when the banksters organize a strike, the government takes the workers’ earnings and shoves it at the richest bastards??!!
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:27 am
Anyone else got the funny feeling this doesn’t end so well…
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:28 am
Politics must be like heroin…12:27 p.m.New York Mayor Bloomberg says he will seek 3rd term: report
mOTHER OF gOD • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:29 am
WHERE THE FUCK DID SIMPLE FAIRNESS IN THIS WORLD EVER GO?WHEN WAS THE GOLDEN RULE OUTLAWED?????????
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:32 am
美國房地產數據公司Radar Logic表示,由於抵押房屋遭沒收,加深樓價跌幅,7月份美國25個大城市中,有24個區的樓價均錄得按年跌幅。其中拉斯維加斯以每方呎計的跌幅最大,達33%。洛杉磯、鳳凰城、三藩市等的跌幅均達28%。
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:35 am
I am so f jealous.Who’s your fortune teller? Excel?
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:36 am
no point.Nouriel gets to pat his back on the accuracy of his projections… So do I….actually, where I’m at is a point of frustration. As a banker, dealing with Wall st for the past 15 years, I’ve learned how to watch their flow. I’ve pretty much become obsessed with analyzing it. That’s what brought me to this website 2 years ago.Over the past 2 years, I have made nothing but dead on accurate projections… and have been well ahead of the curve, but yet find myself immersed with people who don’t listen to me. (at least on the RGE I get some acknowledgement from some fellow bloggers) Now, at the precipice of yet another major market turn, I have worked through my economic flow of what I think should happen vs what I see being done… and I find my thought process once again dismissed by the people I deal with.My frustration is this… If I’ve been right all this time… then why don’t people think my solutions would be right?I’m just venting a bit. (hell, I can’t even get my own parents to listen to any of my financial advise)…and MY ADVICE HAS BEEN FREE ALL ALONG!!! With no ulterior motives. (I’m not trying to sell anything!!!) …just trying to help. Knowledge is king.yep… like I said earlier. “no point” just “frustration”.MA
tutterfrut • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:38 am
This thread, you mean? Could be. It looks more and more Chinese to me. Am I losing it?
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:42 am
AfA 2 things. my “eyes” and excel.I love excel. For fun, i created a program to solve suduko puzzles. It took about 900 lines of code.I do the same kinda economic workouts, on excel, but the variable are so far reaching, and bugs exist. (likewise, some calculations that I create, don’t gel with future additions to my thought process, thus throwing the spreadsheets out of whack.It’s the FREAKIN REASON I can’t finish my “evapor-flation” theory!!!Miss America
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:44 am
People won’t see what they don’t want to see, and they won’t hear what they don’t want to hear. I don’t want to see and hear it either, but my overriding desire is for truth and reality. I can’t speak for anyone else, but I appreciate your contributions here very much.
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:53 am
You gotta see me after I talk with traders…The fire running through my veins has got to show??? …and their dismisal of my thought process leaves me wondering if I should punch them or myself (myself – for thinking I could change them or their nature)That bull/trader mentality is nearly as powerful as religious belief. …and the reason I don’t want Paulson anywhere near this bailout plan!!!MA
tutterfrut • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:53 am
Me too, Miss America, I like your comments and will keep reading them until the final ‘bathing suite’ parade…
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:58 am
The only way I don’t want Bloomberg for mayor… is if he ran for President!He has my utmost respect. I swear by him.Miss Americap.s. He takes no paycheck. (works for free) and has straight talked to NYC since the finacial crisis of NYC/9-11.He could be off in his ivory tower still making millions, but has chosen a better path for the purpose of making other people’s lives better.
Mother of God • October 2nd, 2008 at 11:59 am
could someone please explain to a techno-ignoramous (me) what these squares mean? What are they? Do they really say something…like in a computer code or somethin’?
Hazleton • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
@MAJust an FYII seek out your comments daily. Sometimes I print them so I can review them at a later date because they are so helpful.
PhilT • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
A direct link at BBC provides its own streamat this link :Roubini/BBC Interview Direct Link => HardTalk
AnonV • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
They are comments written in Chinese. You can copy them and paste them into Googles language translator for a rough translation.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:13 pm
SUGAR on a TURDLIPSTICK on a PIGThe MSM is pulling the curtain over all of itwith blanket build up to Biden/Palin debate as the eventof the century!
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:18 pm
Rough translation:Don’t worry – be happy – We are your new Masters!
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:21 pm
From a previous post:I am no economist, but I have spent close to 20 hours a day for a decade being baptised by fire in the ubernasty world of deep, deep, deep geopolitics. I would give anything to tell you all the truth about why any plan that would actually work to end this nightmare is absolutely being 100% ignored.But if I told you the truth, you would hunt me down and make sure I was forcibly medicated, because the truth is so heinous and ugly that it is almost impossible for good and decent people to believe. The truth would drive most people past the limits of what they can allow in, and would probably steal all happiness and peace of mind from the best hearts and souls.PeteCA is on the right track, but even Pete has only glimpsed the tip of the tip of the tip of the iceberg of the stratospheric criminality being protected by passage of this bill or of any bill that allows cover up to continue.Keep fighting to get Nouriel Roubini’s solution on the public’s radar.You are in a knifefight.Don’t bring plastic cutlery to defend yourselves with. The time for steel is now.Henry Paulsen wants your freedom turned into his license.Ill gotten gains will be ill spent.There is a reason Sibel Edmonds has been gagged.Valerie Plame was not outed because of some petty wish by the bushco criminal cabal to get back at her husband. That is the cover story.The black network behind BCCI never went away…Hide replies Reply to this comment By Anonymous on 2008-09-30 15:03:18==============So my question is: What about Ron Paul? If this is true, how is he able to function?
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:23 pm
U.S. real estate data company Radar Logic said that as the housing mortgage forfeited, deepening decline in property prices, in July the United States in 25 major cities, 24 districts in prices were recorded in the year-on-year decline. Las Vegas, one per square foot of the largest decrease, amounting to 33%. Los Angeles, Phoenix and San Francisco reached 28% decline.http://translate.google.com/translate_t?hl=en#
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Oh great. So we can be ruled by people who know even less about economics than the current fiasco.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:26 pm
Russian President Vladimir Medvedev in St. Petersburg University speech that the global financial crisis shows that dominate the U.S. economy to the “one economy, one currency” leading the global economy over the period. He called for the establishment of a new and more rational financial system.http://translate.google.com/translate_t?hl=en#
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Peak to trothS&P 1,576 – 1,106 = 30% dropHS 31,958 – 16,283 = 50% dropUS infrastructure needs fixes for the demand of 300,000,000 peopleChina infrastructure needs fixes and creation for the demand of 1,200,000,000 peopleHow do economies create? Through Bonds.To sell bonds, you need buyers.To buy bonds you need what???At a 50% loss, capitol does not flow the way you need it to.You say Po-tay-ta, I say po-tata.You say new masters, I say Ch-Enron.Miss America
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
@ BBH “Dont worry Bush will bail you guys out too.”Enough of this flummery. Are you such a partisan spectator that you cannot see beyond political rhetoric? Do you really believe this game of Bailout was invented by batboys, the likes of George Bush or Bill Clinton? If so, you must study the history of American financial and political football, a game that began in 1913.Grasp the import of this remark by Walter Wriston, chairman of the Citicorp Bank in 1982:“If we had a truth-in-Government act comparable to the truth-in-advertising law, every note issued by the Treasury would be obliged to include a sentence stating: “This note will be redeemed with the proceeds from an identical note which will be sold to the public when this one comes due.”This persistent “rolling over of debt” is the football that enables big bank players to score off large, unsound loans. But the game is stalled. These unsound loans are now in the default zone and the players’ multi-trillion dollar winnings are in jeopardy.Bernanke’s play is to create additional money out of nothing to lend to defaulting borrowers so they can borrow more and pay even higher interest to keep the Big Bank Monopoly players in profits and the rigged leverage bets coming in. If he fails to make good on the $40 trillion in toxic waste fallout from fiat money and Street corruption at the bettors’ window, the whole game is in jeopardy.But wait! Congress has stepped in. The game is extended! Waving the old banner canard of “preventing dire consequences to the taxpayers,” Congress, and Obama, and McCain and Bush et al are going to save the deadbeats. The game continues!The only losers are the dollar and the taxpayers…who just had the wheels stripped off their cars in the parking lot. But what the hey, they’re always on the losing side.
London Banker • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm
@ MAYou’re a savant. Wonderful. And we here who have been following you for the whole past two years here appreciate it.
London Banker • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:40 pm
You will, of course, let us know when the corner comes again, won’t you? It was pretty impressive the way you timed it back in the spring.
P1AQL • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:49 pm
I think the trust is not broken given the near zero yield on the 3 month T Bill. Debt risk bearers should not be punished since they were being sold AAA rated securities which was a clear misrepresentation as Stiglitz has said before. Had the ratings agency not given the AAA those securities would not have been mispriced.Killing of bond holders is not funny. Ask France when they came up short when at war while the British Royal Navy never had funding problems because the UK never defaulted on their perps.P1AQL.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:56 pm
It’s a Race to the Bottom on steroids … the Great Leveling. We’re all third world nations now!Noam Chomsky’s ‘Manufacturing Consent’ in realtime USA.Miltion Friedman’s ‘Shock Doctrine’ on home turf.Vivre la revolution
P1AQL • October 2nd, 2008 at 12:59 pm
I’ve used the word strangulation from the noose of high interest rates for Europe before. It is complete now. They can lower their rates all they want.The Alpha is now indeed ours. Nothing you can do about it.P1AQL.
P1AQL • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:02 pm
Thanks for the update Mark!With delta(PPI) > delta(CPI) => This talk of hyper inflation is all garbage as the consumer smacks the producer in the face.Ben, PRINT AT WILL.P1AQL.
Russian Bear • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm
do you think the S&P will be happy to down grade the USA?
Mom o' G • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:05 pm
cool. thanks for the answer!
Greg • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:20 pm
MA,While I don’t live in NYC, I have to agree with assessment on Bloomberg. I was really hoping he would get some traction in the presidential race. The man is brilliant with his problem solving abilities.Also – props on your calls on RGE.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:21 pm
My letter to Sen. Boxer:Senator,I am a progressive Independent voter who has always supported you in the past. Sadly,I can do that no longer after your vote for TARP, a criminal tax payer heist by the most egregious, greedy traitors this country has known–the FED, treasury and the Bush administration. Why in hell would you give this incompetent, discredited, lame-duck administration which fostered this disaster exactly what they wanted? Not only do the so called safeguards have no teeth, no relending requirements, no limits on current executive compensation, but you then loaded another $100 bill in pork to make sure it passed!! If you don’t understand the complex finances and the implications of this bill, which will do nothing for the sinking economy and create even more mistrust of the markets, why not do nothing; or better yet, wait until after the elections when there is time to evaluate better proposals? Should Obama win, by Jan 20, 2009 the $700 billion will be gone–vaporized forever. Do you and the rest of Congress really believe the taxpayers will make money on this? The treasury will take the worst of the assets, buy them at inflated prices, as the housing market continues to decline. And do you think the banks will want to lend into a diving economy? I think not. They will take the recapitalized funds and go to greener pastures–gold, commodities, hedge funds, you name it! That is sure looking out for the taxpayer! What is good for Goldman Sachs, Senator, is not good for the country. If you haven’t realized that by now, you should give up your career in politics now. No Senator, you and the Democratic leadership have proved to be as inept and shortsided as your Republican counterparts. And you have betrayed us in a profound way. I will not vote for you in 2010.
Miss Italy • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:22 pm
I’ve been following your advice very closely and, most of all, you helped me understand the likely play of TPTB. Learnt a lot in the process and made also some money, although only half of what I could have made if criminal SEC didn’t change the “rules” of the game with my chips on the table.Thanks so much for sharing your knowledge. You are the best.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:37 pm
This is America we’re talking about. In these critical moments nothing could be less useful than for Democrats and Republicans to use bailout to rail against the opposing candidates. What is useful is to realize that the political classes on both sides of the aisle are as guilty as Eve and that the only the real issue worth discussing is the heinous bail out of financial corruption with taxpayer money at horrendous price.The public is beginning to identify the real problem and who caused it. Opposition to bailout is powerful and growing. Congressional politicians are throwing in everything that America has to save these corrupt financiers. But know that all their complicity and duplicitous representation won’t work. The economy won’t permit it: it’s sliding now.
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Mr. Paulson’s initial three-page plan was simply a term sheet broadly outlining a plan for the purpose of commencing negotiations. If the government is going to spend $700 or $800 billion, I certainly would expect any bill authorizing such a large expenditure to be more than three pages long. Providing more detail in the bill about how the money would be spent is a good thing, and providing more detail tends to result in the use of more pages. That the senate amendment is 450 pages long doesn’t really tell you anything about whether it’s a good or bad piece of legislation.SWK
London Banker • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Uh oh. This doesn’t look good for the Paulson cabal . . . multipolarity, the rule of law and respect for mutual interests are exactly what they don’t want from all appearances.
US economic dominance over – RussiaFrom correspondents in St Petersburg | October 02, 2008THE era of US global economic dominance is over and the world now needs a new and “more just” financial system, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said today.“The time of domination by one economy and one currency has been consigned to the past once and for all,” Mr Medvedev said in an address to a Russian-German development forum, with German Chancellor Angela Merkel at his side.”We must work together towards building a new and more just financial-economic system in the world based on the principles of multipolarity, supremacy of the law and taking account of mutual interests.”The current crisis proved that even with its vast economic resources the United States was not in a position to play the role of “mega-regulator” and that a new system based on collective management was needed, he said.”We simply need new mechanisms of collective decision-making and collective responsibility,” Mr Medvedev said.His comments came a day after Russia’s powerful Prime Minister Vladimir Putin lashed out at US economic “irresponsibility” for the global financial crisis.”Everything happening now in the economic and financial sphere began in the United States,” Mr Putin told a televised government meeting.”This is not the irresponsibility of specific individuals but the irresponsibility of the system which claims leadership,” he said.Mr Putin’s remarks, made hours before the US Senate approved a $US700 billion ($A888 billion) Government bailout plan for the country’s financial sector, were rebuffed by the White House, which called them “unfair” finger-pointing.Russia’s young stock markets, rarely predictable in normal times, have swung wildly in recent weeks as the scope of the US-rooted crisis has become clear, with regulators repeatedly suspending trading after sharp drops.Although Russia’s Central Bank still holds massive US dollar reserves, the Kremlin has in the past two years sought to diversify the country’s holdings, notably by boosting holdings in euros.New housing and automobile purchases in Russia, two closely watched indicators of Russia’s economic health, are heavily dependent on bank financing and the crisis has reportedly taken a toll in those two sectors.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Officials Refuse to Provide Details on Secret Previous BailoutFed Made $30 Billion Deal to Manage Assets of the Collapsed Bear SternsBy JUSTIN ROODOctober 1, 2008Top government officials are refusing to provide details on a secretive deal it made to manage billions in assets from an earlier bailout.Sen. Charles Grassley, (R)Iowa, has been pressing top officials for months to provide details on a deal the Federal Reserve made for a private firm to manage $30 billion in financial assets from the collapsed investment bank Bear Stearns, as part of an arrangement to facilitate J.P. Morgan Chase’s purchase of the bank in March.The Federal Reserve announced at the time that it had contracted with BlackRock Financial Management Inc. to manage the assets. Since then, it has declined to share any further details on the arrangement with anyone, not reporters, not the public, and not Sen. Grassley.”When will I receive answers to the rest of my questions posed two-and-half months ago?” Grassley wrote to Fed chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson Sept. 23, asking for an update on the value of the assets and other details of the deal.In his letter, Grassley pointedly noted his need for timely answers in light of “the continuing financial crisis where more transparency is being promised,” and the urgent press from the administration for lawmakers to approve a massive bailout program.Grassley’s office confirmed to ABC News Wednesday afternoon it had not received any new information on the deal.A spokesman for the Federal Reserve said he did not know the status of any congressional request. The spokesman, Andrew Williams, declined to share any information on the arrangement with BlackRock, saying, “Our general principle is we don’t disclose contracts we make with outside contractors.”A spokeswoman for BlackRock also declined to speak about the deal. “As a matter of policy we don’t comment on client activity or client accounts,” said BlackRock’s Bobbie Collins.Copyright © 2008 ABC News Internet Ventures
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:48 pm
When is the house vote?
Anonymous • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm
and knowing this, Grassley voted for the bailout last night.
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Dr. Roubini:I understand your points about the rescue plan being flawed because: 1) it doesn’t directly recapitalize the banks through the government taking an equity stake in them, e.g., buying preferred shares; and 2) it doesn’t provide for any “cram down” of mortgage debt to assure relief to stressed consumers. What I fail to understand are the reasons that Ben Bernanke, who spent the better part of his academic career studying the Great Depression and thinking about how to deal with economic crises, apparently did not emphasize the need for such provisions in a plan. Why, I wonder, did he and Secretary Paulson focus principally on the government buying up the bad debt alone? Why would a guy who is so intimately familiar with the economic history of the Great Depression not insist on creating a HOLC-like program as a critical component of any rescue plan?Thank you,SWK
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:56 pm
The last hour witching has begun!! Stocks vaulting higher right on schedule!
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Tomorrow, I believe.SWK
Anonymous • October 2nd, 2008 at 1:57 pm
I think so, eu sou brasileiro, tenho certeza que o bailout vai ser estendido a todos. ahahahhah
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:02 pm
I don’t see any “vaulting,” just a 10% uptick.
Average Jane • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:03 pm
Well done.
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:04 pm
Which has now dissipated, as we’re back over a 300-point loss on the DOW. This is just volatility.SWK
P1AQL • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:05 pm
OB, 22c on the dollar is a near fear price. CA prices may be 30% down, but they can’t be down forever. Since the US will take over these questionable assets, they can takeover the troubled mortgages forever. Let’s say the eventual steady state price loss is 20%. That’s the price Hank would pay now.When sunny California beacons new immigrants (not a problem given the queues outside US consulates in China and India now), lots of household formation will take place and the 80% intrinsic value of these assets will be less than market value.Overpaying for the assets compared to their ridiculous current market value is the perfect section of the Paulson plan.P1AQL.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:07 pm
@Guest, good job and better than my more passion-heated one below. I hope it encourages others to write their representative AGAIN. They are still nervous and watching the numbers, and this point in time before the election is a rare moment of leverage for us. It’s also similar to the moments before the first vote last week. Here’s mine to Joe Wilson-R, SC:Dear Congressman Wilson:You voted “yes” on the original bailout plan offered by Secretary Paulson, despite the strong and broad opposition of the American public to this extremely flawed plan. Therefore, I have little hope that you will reconsider voting “No” on the Senate version. But I would like to make one last appeal to you before you vote again.All Americans, regardless of their level of wealth and education, clearly recognize that just because investment banks like Bear Stears and Lehman stupidly decided to get in the real estate business as principal (and thereby created our current unhealthy credit expansion almost single-handedly through their mortgage-securitization activities), this in no way justifies Secretary Paulson’s request for the U.S. taxpayer to now bail them out. A fundamental correction is needed in housing prices which unavoidably entails substantial credit losses, and it will be painful for everyone. But no one should seriously consider trading our children & grandchildrens’ future for our own pensions.Whether you are a single mother quickly educating yourself about this issue on the internet or a respected banking/finance expert like Bert Ely, you recognize exactly who the Emergency Economic bailout is for. And every politician, from McCain to Obama, who doubts that the American public clearly recognizes who is on their side vs. who is on the side of the wealthiest 1% will find out on Nov. 4.Respectfully etc.,
P1AQL • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Agree with MA above. China and India are toast on new infra if they can’t sell bonds. No one will take RMB or INR and they can’t issue ECB/FCCB (converts) since the dollars are going home fast to recapitalise.P1AQL.PS: MA, How about my prediction of May the USD be with you??????
Anonymous • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:12 pm
I feel sick…..I think I have to look away for a few days.
Dan • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:15 pm
I wish to add my name to the list of your followers.Thanks and please do not stop.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:20 pm
“Is This The Stake Through Neo-Liberalism’s Heart?” by Alexander Cockburn (of counterpunch fame)What exploded last week was an economic credo that has been rolling along since the early 1970s: neoliberalism. By all rights, this last crisis has brought us to the crossroads where neoliberalism should be buried with a stake through its heart.We’ve had 30 years worth of deregulation — the loosening of public controls on Wall Street and the banking industry. This has been the neoliberal mantra preached by both major parties, the whole of the establishment press and almost every university economics department in the country. It is central to the current disasters. And if you want to identify symbolic figures in the legislated career of deregulation, there are no more resplendent culprits than the man at McCain’s elbow, Phil Gramm, and the man standing at Obama’s elbow at his press conference, Robert Rubin.Gramm is a prime exhibit in any list of the architects of the current economic mess. At the behest of the banking industry, he wrote the laws that enabled the huge balloons of funny money debt that exploded this year. The deregulatory statutes bearing his name, eagerly signed by Bill Clinton, prompted Wall Street’s looting ogres and the subprime thievery.But is Gramm Exhibit A among the miscreants? No. That honor should surely go to Bill Clinton’s Treasury Secretary, the former Goldman Sachs bond trader Robert Rubin, and to the economic course he set for his boss. Gramm has been the hireling of the banking industry. Rubin is at the beating heart of Wall Street finance, and he and Lawrence Summers at Clinton’s Treasury, were the guiding forces for financial deregulation. The gang that successfully got out of Dodge in time was the Clinton-Rubin-Summers gang, just before the last bubble — the stock market bubble — burst in March of 2001. They knew what was coming.The Republicans hoped that the roof wouldn’t fall in on their watch, and the crisis could be deferred to 2008 and then blamed on the Democrats.But their insurance policy was that if the roof did cave, as it has now, the rescue policy would be identical in both cases. That’s why Obama has collected more money than McCain from the big Wall Street houses.Now, as in the final reel of the old-fashioned Hollywood cliffhangers, it’s a race against time. Will Congress stiffen its spine, face down Paulson’s blackmail and tell him there’ll be no $700 billion on his terms?….Americans have been living in a casino economy for years… But at the prospect of a long-term losing run, they are getting frightened and angry, fast. Congress knows it could be facing voters who can see what’s coming over the horizon when the Treasury bails out Wall Street…[A]s Obama polls higher than 50 percent for the first time on day three of the bailout hearings, he clearly deems it too rash to try to ignore a populist constituency. His proposed conditions on the bailout have been very tame. He’s frightened of setting a match to the tinder of public outrage and thinks it’s seemly to have Rubin, Summers and Volcker stand next to him. Those are his natural instincts, anyway.The irony is that it’s McCain’s demagoguery about hanging the chairman of the SEC that’s shoved Obama a bit to the left. In extremis McCain will say and do anything. He put Sarah Palin on the ticket. Maybe now he’ll propose an FDR-type New Deal and Obama will have to raise the ante and start sounding like a real leader who can seize the opportunity presented by this crisis, which the gods have offered him with such perfect timing.http://www.creators.com/opinion/alexander-cockburn.html?columnsN
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Why does Roubini allow this kind of blog graffiti on his site: market watch and others clean it off when it hits their screens? Wanton, pointless gutter language such as this posted by “Madonna” may be the natural glee of unwashed humanity, but it sure makes a mess on a blog. I
PhilT • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Unfortunately, Obama did not take the oppty. to riseto the occasion when he could have, when he shouldhave. Now all of those who have preached of Obama’sinexperience and lack of leadership skills have theirconfirmation.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm
“Lipstick on a Bailout” by Ron PaulOctober 2, 2008 — This time last week, the biggest bailout in the history of the world seemed to be a fait accompli. Last weekend, the Fed Chairman and the Secretary of the Treasury had harsh words of doom and gloom for Congressional leaders, with the rest of the administration parroting along, and by last Monday it seemed both parties were about to fall in line and vote our Republic away by socializing the banking industry through this bailout.Foolish business behavior was about to be rewarded, and propped up a little longer, the bubble blown a little bigger, and our coming Depression made that much greater, but then something happened on the way to the House floor.Citizens made their voices heard.The real story behind the story in Congress this week was the thousands of calls and emails sent to Representatives, clogging up inboxes and even slowing down the House internet system. Slowly, like the Titanic turning around, sentiments on the Hill shifted, and we heard Congressmen capitulating and changing their tune a little, desperately trying to find ways to salvage the bailout without completely enraging their constituencies.Now we hear about taxpayer protections, about golden parachutes, and about other nuances that hardly cover up the fact that we would be creating more money out of thin air and further devaluing the dollar! The problem is not HOW the government is spending this money; it’s the fact that the government is spending this money. We don’t have it. We are already nearly $10 trillion in debt, not including unfunded liabilities. We already spend about $1 trillion a year we don’t have on our overseas empire. Now nearly $1 trillion more is somehow supposed to magically appear and solve all our problems! No – creating more money might delay the inevitable for some well-connected banks on Wall Street, but in a few weeks we will find ourselves right back in this same position, but much poorer.The unfortunate thing is that we’ve already spent at least $700 billion on other bailouts that did not solve the problem. And while all this negotiation was taking place, the auto industry was quietly bailed out, with no controversy, no discussion, to the tune of $25 billion…
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:44 pm
When they said: “with German Chancellor Angela Merkel at his side” what did that mean? Do you know or have you heard anything?If Germany gets behind it, I could picture there being a story here with a little potential.If Merkel was there just to hear (rather then support) then it doesn’t mean much… IMO.Russia isn’t afraid to make a lot of noise, with little follow through. …are they still trying to sue BoNY for a gazillion dollars? (Because some Rus/mob laundered cash through BoNY’s London desk 10 years ago…)It’s interesting none the less.Does Russia have financial allies?(I’m not fishing. I really don’t know?)Miss America
MA • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:46 pm
p.s. thanks for the booyaah earlier. Too much stress lately.I’m looking forward to my disney trip!!!
tutterfrut • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
It has lots of european ‘natural gas dependents’…
Anonymous • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:56 pm
i am new, what are you predicting as the out come to what is happening ? Please i’d love to hear.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Neoliberalism has exported bankrupt economic policies and misery to humans the world over. This truly may be a juncture where there’s a dramatic shift in American consciousness.I’m not counting on it.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:05 pm
Take heart, my friend. What the public can’t bring down, the economy will. This is the biggest political confrontation the public has faced in our lifetimes. The people have been fighting an unknown enemy for a long time and that enemy has now been identified. This is good.America put in an emergency call to her representatives and nobody answered. Their phone is off the hook. It’s been off the hook for a long, long time.This, Anon, is America’s wake-up call. And she’s waking up and she’s in a very bad mood. It’s not wise to rile America.Paulson and Bernanke and the Congress have awakened a sleeping giant. Let the battle begin.
London Banker • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:13 pm
STRATEGERY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLCFunniest thing I’ve seen all week! Be sure to click through to all the pages on the site.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm
Not only that, on page 5 line 20 of the Emergency Economic Rescue Act of 2008, the Treasury is allowed to purchase commercial mortgages. What does that have to do with rescuing the average american? Was commercial real estate also victim of fraudulent lending practices? This is crazy! We are rescuing wall street from their bad investments and that’s all.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Truth is always funnier than fiction.Good one!
OuterBeltway • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:19 pm
P1AQL- I follow your logic, but I question two assumptions and I draw your attention to an obvious omission.Firstly, you assumed that there is no opportunity cost for that $700B. There definitely is: we could be fixing our economy instead of bailing out poorly managed banks.Secondly, you assumed that there is no carrying cost to the public for the debt we have to incur in order to buy those assets. Clearly there is.Also, the public takes the risk if the prices don’t revert to mean. And they may not. RTC lost money, remember?Tell me again why we shouldn’t just short-circuit the top tier I-banks, and make Fed loans to mid-tier banks, with durations of 90-180 days, earmarked expressly for working capital. For example.That puts the money where it’ll do some good.I did not see that idea in the Wall Street IB-Chairman, now Treasury Secretary’s proposal to Congress.Puzzling omission, that.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:26 pm
“They” are using stocks to assure passage tomorrow. Stocks will open down 200 more before the vote, then rally 100 points after it passes…BULLETIN DOW INDUSTRIALS FALL 348 POINTS TO THREE-YEAR LOW
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:28 pm
That should have been “1000 points”. Sorry
London Banker • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:31 pm
From Der SpiegelThe End of Arrogance: America loses its dominant economic role
Merkel talked about a “distribution of risk at everyone’s expense” and the consequences for the “economic situation in the coming months and possibly even years.” Most of all, she made it clear who she considers the true culprit behind the current plight. “The German government pointed out the problems early on,” said the chancellor, whose proposals to impose tighter international market controls failed repeatedly because of US opposition. “Some things can be done at the national level,” she said, “but most things have to be handled internationally.”Merkel had never publicly criticized the United States this harshly and unapologetically. In this regard, she enjoys the wholehearted support of her coalition government partner, the center-left Social Democrats (SPD). In a speech before Germany’s parliament, the Bundestag, Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück of the SPD spoke of the end of the United States as a “superpower of the global financial system.”
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:35 pm
So the Plunge Protection Team has become the Plunge Precipitation Team? Interesting hypothesis…SWK
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:43 pm
I just looked at the money supply and moetary base data for the week and MAN! BOOM! The monetary base grew by $67.7 Billion the week ending Sept 24th-ONE WEEK it grew 8.02%
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:47 pm
This ‘gutter language’ seems rather tame when held up to the obscenities coming from Wall Street and Washington.I guess it’s a matter of personal tastes.We rabble aren’t easily fooled by polite insults and cleverly crafted obfuscations.
OuterBeltway • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:54 pm
John Stuart Mill writes:Panics do not destroy capital; they merely reveal the extent to which it has been previously destroyed by its betrayal into hopelessly unproductive works.
———–Both my Senators voted for the Bailout. I called them today to rake them over the coals. Not because they didn’t vote as I had hoped, but because (as is generally the case) they acted like Buffalo, and went stampeding over the cliff.Their packaged pablum of penitence offered the most cursory of explanations, like so:”I hated to do it, but the economy will melt, or at least that’s what I’ve been told. Plus, we had to get out of town”.If I was a legislative aide, it would make me cringe to read such whiny drivel to people.
Stratonovich calculus • October 2nd, 2008 at 3:59 pm
سهّروني اللّيل عيونك خلّيني بلجو أنا الغلطانعرَبِيٌ أَنَايا رايحالف ليلة وليلة فينه انت عمرييوم ورا يوم ألله عليك يا سيدي بتونس فك لو كنت نسيتديني معادطول عمري حنّا السكران حبّيتك و الشوقنحن و القمر جيران بقطفلك بس ما حدى نطرني أنا ويّاك أنا لحبيبي فيروز
Stratonovich calculus • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Google translate [tinyurl.com/4krl5c] turns up this Boston Globe story:Web page portends death of coupleBy John R. Ellement and Milton J. ValenciaGlobe Staff / September 30, 2008Burdened by debt and facing eviction, a self-employed Boston computer consultant killed his wife and then shot himself Sunday night – but not before leaving a chilling posting on his Internet website announcing their deaths, according to the posting, Boston police, and court records.Christian Mogensen, 61, was inside the couple’s 20th-floor apartment in Charles River Park when he shot and killed his wife of almost 12 years, 60-year-old Sharon Glassman, with a single gunshot around 9:30 p.m., authorities said. He shot himself a short time afterward, police said.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:17 pm
Think of Paul Warburg in March 1929. Shunned at teh country club, called Gloomy Gus. But he was out of the market in October and those who scoffed weren’t.Must have been frustrating to be Cassandra too.But being right is it’s own reward… and being appreciated by a small circle of freinds.Count me as an anonymous friend, MA.
tutterfrut • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:23 pm
And after the vote “the Paulson Propeller Tool”
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:28 pm
May I make my opine here despite your question not be addressed to me?I believe that matters of socio-economic affairs have been seconded from the body technical by the body political for reason aforesaid, that “leadership” is in crisis and does not trust the technical elements any more; you can see this over the past 40 years from American influence on the World. Connections and networking are the only real considerations of merit where real credentials are allocated to the pseudo academic arenas and ignored.As a consequence of this trend (preference) on society, incompetence has permeated almost every aspect of socio-economic affairs.Or, the economy is in the hands of “politics”. And, Ben will do what he is told but will be given a pulpit as a reward. This is very much the usual American way of management. Thank you for your patienceHo hum
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:33 pm
Can you point me to where I can find these numbers?
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:41 pm
Ron Paul and his free market ideology is a Wall Street wet dream. He’s no threat to anyone. He functions perfectly as a harmless distraction that encourages folks to believe that he’s offering some sort of an alternative.He’s not. It’s the same old, same old.
Average Jane • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:41 pm
So did mine. Pathetic purveyors of populist pablum. You crack me up, OB. Let’s get the House riled up again.
Mother of God • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:44 pm
What a heart of cold stone it takes to refer to “unwashed humanity”! That comment is the one that is beyond disgusting and revolting.
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:45 pm
I am sure that in this nasty business of treason and theft, that your computer monitors get fouled and as dirty as mine so, for those wishing a solution to this dirty business, there is now a technical on-line answer. Your mileage may vary.http://www.actrix.co.nz/special/cyberclean.htmlI believe that it is free of chargeHo hum
Mother of God • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:57 pm
It is “unwashed humanity” that produces every dime of the wealth the rich get to bet, lose, and be re-compensated for in the markets in the first place.Though I know that fact doesn’t fit with the world’s fantasy-based economics.
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 4:59 pm
The Peristaltic Moment has arrived
”THE AUSTRIAN SCHOOL AND THE MELTDOWNby Dr. Ron PaulThe financial meltdown the economists of the Austrian School predicted has arrived.F.A. Hayek won the Nobel Prize for showing how central banks’ manipulation of interest rates creates the boom-bust cycle with which we are sadly familiar. In 1932, in the depths of the Great Depression, he described the foolish policies being pursued in his day – and which are being proposed, just as destructively, in our own: “This came in the Daily Reckoning Newsletter so please Google (or whatever) for the full text. Excellent common sense. Make this guy your next President, er, please?Ho hum
kilgores • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Thanks for your opinion, Peter. I’m not sure, however, that I buy that explanation. I think there’s something less sinister afoot than mere syncophancy.SWK
PeterJB • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Thank you. I wasn’t suggesting that it was sinister – just a socio-economic trend. I don’t believe in conspiracies, although of late, i am somewhat tempted to:-)>Perhaps the root cause is money being impatient accelerating the development process, this in turn could imply that an increase in population numbers, could provide for such a scenario? Shareholder returns (faster and bigger) also serves to distort reason somewhat.We also must remember that stupidity isn’t racially constrained and is also not limited by borders or class. We can all share this state of being, as can be seen to be the case.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:25 pm
I love it: Pug’s Screen Cleaning.
Little Saver • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:30 pm
This even beats Monty Python. John Cleese with his silly walk was just an amateur. Bush, Paulson and Bernanke with their silly talk just are a class apart. The apex of surrealism, the artists of self-indulgination.
Anonymous • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:38 pm
I just wanted to point out that the spending authorization under the bailout plan is NOT $700 billion. It is actually UNLIMITED. Under both the House and Senate bills, Henry Paulson is empowered to purchase as many troubled assets as he pleases as long as the assets, once purchased, are re-sold. Here is an excerpt from the Senate bailout bill.SEC. 115. GRADUATED AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE.13 (a) AUTHORITY.—The authority of the Secretary to14 purchase troubled assets under this Act shall be limited15 as follows:16 (1) Effective upon the date of enactment of this17 Act, such authority shall be limited to18 $250,000,000,000 outstanding at any one time.Please not the phrase “outstanding at any one time.” (line 18). This phrase qualifies all dollar caps in Section 115 of both the House and Senate bills. This one paragraph alone (the limitation to $250 billion OUTSTANDING AT ANY ONE TIME) authorizes immediate discretionary spending by the Secretary of the Treasury well in excess of $700 billion.Here is a scenario in which the $250 billion cap is never exceeded yet the program quickly costs taxpayers well in excess of $700 billion. Henry Paulson buys $100 billion in “troubled assets” every week, then sells those assets the next week for 10 cents on the dollar. Each time this happens a $90 billion loss is incurred and what he bought in the prior week is zeroed out. In just 3 months, this process could result in a dead loss to taxpayers of a trillion dollars.The “outstanding at any one time” qualification also establishes perverse incentives. Instead of the more prudent approach of buying and holding better assets until the market strengthens, the incentive is to buy assets indiscriminately and to re-sell immediately. This is the very “fire-sale” approach which the bailout plan was supposedly designed to avoid.Much of this buying and selling is made specifically subject to the Secretary of the Treasury’s (Hank Paulson’s) discretion. For the non-lawyers out there, here is a rule from Administrative Law 101: matters committed by statute to agency discretion are generally unreviewable by the courts.Katie in Houston
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 5:56 pm
@PeterJB”Make this guy your next President, er, please?”As a liberal progressive, I sincerely hope not. I’m sure that Paul’s heart is in the right place and he’s got a finger on the pulse of some of the US’s financial ills, but his philosophy and intellectual curiosity is limited in scope. He doesn’t represent mainstream America.I fear that he’d do more harm than good.
Marc August • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:04 pm
@Katie In HoustonIn your scenario, the $90 billion loss per week would accumulate and reduce the available funds. Eventually locking up the entire $750 billionMarc August
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:28 pm
That what I was saying a week ago.Losses to taxpayers are a function of1-the average loss/paper; and2-the average paper turnoverI do not see any provision that limits the amount the Treasury can raise at any given time. By issuing bonds every week or so, the Treasury can keep the $250B outstanding at any time, while incurring unlimited losses, potentially in excess of $700B.@Marc August:”In your scenario, the $90 billion loss per week would accumulate and reduce the available funds. Eventually locking up the entire $750 billion”Is there a provision that restricts the Treasury from issuing more bonds beyond the first $700B?
Mark • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:37 pm
Just what IS “mainstream America?” And how, if the economic structure collapses, would it continue to be that?
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:50 pm
TED SPREAD OVER 360 BPS
Jim • October 2nd, 2008 at 6:58 pm
I promise not to hunt you down (tranquilizers in hand) if you say more … and the more specific, the better. Steel is sharpened on samll hard facts.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:00 pm
Wasn’t GWB supposedly a good representation of “mainstream America”?
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:07 pm
Mainstream America are the folks that need affordable National Health Care, Social Security, Unemployment Insurance and protection from predatory lenders, none of which fall within the parameters of Ron Paul’s ideological vision.
PhilT • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:08 pm
DON’T FEED THE GREEDCongressman Brad Sherman (D-CA) believes the new Senate bailout billfails to address the fundamental flaws in the bill thatwas rejected by the House last Monday.For more information on => Sherman’s position, click here.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:18 pm
Yeah, what a joke. It’s time for Americans to stop electing puppet presidents who they think would be a great guy to have a beer with.We know who George W’s real base is.Wake up America!
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Credit Default Swap…after all these years, and all these wars, and all the fianacial panics of history, this Piece of Shit is going to bring down the western world? It is just amazing. 62 Trillion. Sixty two trillion.
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Supporting the “Operation Save the Fed” thesis:
“With the worsening in mortgage markets since last quarter, we estimate a range of $2 billion to $6 billion of unrealized losses,[related to the Fed's exposure to BSC]” the New York-based [BoA's] analysts wrote.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:49 pm
Indeed. It’s the most vulgar expression human wantonness and greed that can actually be measured.
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Lawmakers Switching Sides to Support Rescue Bill (Update3)By Laura Litvan and Brian FalerOct. 2 (Bloomberg) — U.S. lawmakers who helped defeat a financial-market rescue package this week are reconsidering their votes amid signs the crisis on Wall Street is spreading.At least six lawmakers, including Republican Zach Wamp of Tennessee and Democrat Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri, now say they would support the measure. Four others say they may switch their ballots before the House votes again, as early as 12:30 p.m. tomorrow, on the measure, which failed by a dozen votes Sept. 29
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 7:57 pm
Sorry, in my haste I left out an ‘of’ …Indeed. It’s the most vulgar expression _of_ human wantonness and greed that can actually be measured.
Mark • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:02 pm
And just how, given our massive debts, are we supposed to afford all of this?Keep in mind that 2/3rds of the world’s population lives on $3/day or less.
Marc August • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:05 pm
@AfASorry, I don’t seem to be able to reply within the posts.The authorization limits the amount outstanding. Basically it is a working line of credit. This does not limit the number of transactions, however, any losses they incur will reduce their remaining working line. Their ability to contain losses preserves the ability to reinvest.Marc August
Mark • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:05 pm
If this headline isn’t one for the “no sh#t” category:U.S. Stocks Drop on Concern Banking Rescue Won’t Prevent Worsening Economyhttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aeelyBI721Bo&refer=homeFundamentals, fundamentals… haven’t we been saying this all along?
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:20 pm
That exactly what I said to myself when I saw it this afternoon. Funny how bloombergers turn and twist any Market reaction the wrong way.Before the bailout … oops Rescue plan was voted for by Senate:- When markets went up: “Asian markets rally on expectations Rescue plan would be voted”- When markets went down: “Markets slump over suspicions plan would not be voted”And now this. As the other guy said: Fun-Da-Mentals
Wolf in the Wilds • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:42 pm
Join the club. I realise that most of the people in our industry do not like to see a bad future. They always live on hope and not reality, until of course when they get canned. I call that the bull market mentality. Unfortunately for the markets, most of the guys who have learnt from tragedies like this are out of the industry from the last meltdown. The collective experience in our sector tends to be very shallow.
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 8:58 pm
I have a strong feeling/conviction that the $700B is just an amuse-gueule. Paulson’s plan, if (don’t laugh) passed will just make it easier for raising more money later.Assume, as I said earlier:1-Average loss/paper = 20%2-Average turnover = 1 month*3-Duration = 3 months (Until Paulso leaves office)@Oct.30: Amount outstanding in securities = $700B@Nov.01: Cash in hand = $700*80% = $560B: Buy new securities/ outstanding = $560B: Ask authorization for new issuance: $140B@Nov.30: Amount outstanding in securities = $700B@Dec.01: Cash in hand = $560B: Ask authorization for additional $140B@Dec.30: Amount outstanding in securities = $700B@Jan.01: Cash in hand = $560B: Ask authorization for additional $140B: Amount outstanding in securities = $700B…They can do it for as long as it takes even before tapping the last $700B, making total losses virtually unlimited/undetermined. And they have to do it this way if they want to have any real impact on the market/really rob taxpayers (depending on your vision of things)*Turnover means that a typical security is sold one month after being purchased. Of course not the whole $700B worth of securities will be bought and sold at the same time, but it was assumed so for illustration purposes.
Marc August • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:26 pm
@AfAIf your example is using new auhorizations in addition to the original $700 billion, this would work. I assume this is what your example implies.I also believe that once approved, more will probably follow. New fear generation=new money.Marc August
Guest • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:38 pm
Putting an end to oil wars, corporate welfare and Wall Street bailouts would be a step in the right direction.And fair trade policies and an immediate end to the US’s penchant for propping up puppet dictators around the world, would likely improve the quality of life of those folks currently living on $3 a day or less.Corporate and financial interests are sucking wealth from the bottom of the food chain. And however comfortable folks may think that they are, we’re, none of us, immune from their toxic influence and power.
AfA • October 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Yes, that is the way I feel. Again, if Paulson has any intention to salvage the credit markets, $700B is a drop in the sea, where the rule will be first come, only one served.Asking “un poco más” is much easier once all authorizations/powers are agreed upon/given by Legislators, no need for new hearings, debates or votes.Ask gambling junk addicts.
international trade • May 28th, 2011 at 12:18 pm
Comfortably, the post is during truthfulness a hottest on this subject well known subject matter. I agree with ones conclusions and often will desperately look ahead to your . Saying thanks a lot will not just be sufficient, for ones wonderful ability in your producing. I will immediately grab ones own feed to stay knowledgeable from any sort of update versions. Amazing get the job done and much success with yourbusiness results!











