EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

The transformation of the USA into the USSRA (United Socialist State Republic of America) continues at full speed with the nationalization of AIG

Last week we argued that, with the nationalization of Fannie and Freddie, comrades Bush, Paulson and Bernanke had started transforming the USA into the USSRA (United Socialist State Republic of America). This transformation of the USA into a country where there is socialism for the rich, the well connected and Wall Street (i.e. where profits are privatized and losses are socialized) continues today with the nationalization of AIG.

This latest action on AIG follows a variety of many other policy actions that imply a massive – and often flawed – government intervention in the financial markets and the economy: the bailout of the Bear Stearns creditors; the bailout of Fannie and Freddie; the use of the Fed balance sheet (hundreds of billions of safe US Treasuries swapped for junk toxic illiquid private securities); the use of the other GSEs (the Federal Home Loan Bank system) to provide hundreds of billions of dollars of “liquidity” to distressed, illiquid and insolvent mortgage lenders; the use of the SEC to manipulate the stock market (restrictions on short sales); the use of the US Treasury to manipulate the mortgage market (Treasury will now for the first time outright buy agency MBS to manipulate and prop up this market); the creation of a whole host of new bailout facilities (TAF, TSLF, PDCF) to prop and rescue banks and, for the first time since the Great Depression, to bail out non-bank financial institutions; the recent extension of the collateral available for the TSLF and PDCF facilities to a much wider range of toxic securities including equities and thus allowing the Fed to effectively manipulate even the stock market; and a whole range of other executive and legislative actions (including the recent bill to provide a public guarantee to mortgages for banks willing to reduce their face value).


Related RGE Premium Content:Fed To Rescue AIG In A $85-$90 Billion Deal And Take An 80% StakeGSEs Not Nationalized But in ‘Conservatorship’, Bail-Out for Creditors, Shareholders Trimmed But Not Wiped Out

So, with the nationalization today of AIG, comrades Bush, Paulson and Bernanke welcome you again to the USSRA. At least in the case of Fannie and Freddie these two institutions were semi-public to begin with as they were Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs). Now we get instead the first pure case of a fully private company, actually the largest insurance company in the world, being nationalized. So the US government is now the largerst insurance company in the world. So the transformation of the USA into the USSRA goes a step further.

Let me now flesh out in more detail my arguments on why this government AIG takeover is reckless, flawed and should have and could have been avoided. There were other ways to deal with the potential systemic effects of collapse of AIG…

First, note that the Fed and the Treasury claimed to draw a line in the sand on moral hazard with their decision not to bail out Lehman ; but two days later the financial tsunami of the century wiped out that line and led to the continuation of the mother of all moral hazard bailouts with the nationalization of AIG.

It is likely that AIG’s shareholders (both preferred and common) may be substantially wiped out; but then why does the government take only a 80% equity share in AIG? Why not 100% as it should? So, if by miracle, AIG is not liquidated, such private shareholders instead of being fully wiped out get any upside benefit from this government action.

Compared to the Fannie and Freddie bailout the risk taken by the government in the AIG case seems more limited: then, the preferred shares of the government were senior to common shares and other preferred shares but junior to the unsecured subordinated and senior debt of the agencies. In the case of AIG it appears that the US “loan” has as collateral all of the assets of AIG; if this were to be the case (a point to be clarified as the Fed statement was not clear about the seniority of a loan that has equity-like characteristics) the creditors of AIG would not be scot free as the government claim would have priority over any other secured and unsecured creditors of AIG, including possibly the insurance policy holders of AIG.

If this is truly the case (and I say “if” because the Fed has not been fully clear on the nature of its claims in the pecking order of the capital structure of AIG) the objective of the Fed in its intervention on AIG (i.e. avoiding the systemic effects of a collapse of a large and too big to fail institution) may not be achieved: i.e. if the claims of the government are senior to those of all creditors of AIG then AIG bondholders and also other creditors of AIG get whacked if AIG is insolvent (i.e. if in the effective liquidation of AIG the assets of the firm are lower than its liabilities).

But if the action of the Fed are aimed at facilitating an orderly selling of AIG’s assets how does the Fed ensure that its investment in AIG is safe? In a formal bankruptcy (Chapter 7 and 11) there is a stay on the claims of a firm’ creditors; thus a roll-off of their claims cannot occur. But in this government takeover of AIG how does one ensure that such roll-off of claims does not occur?

The only way to avoid such risk is to impose a stay – like in a formal Chapter 7 or 11 – on such claims. But if the objective of the government was to avoid a disorderly workout that a formal bankruptcy would have entailed how does one ensure – short of an effective stay on all creditors claims – that the public money provided to AIG (the $85 billion “loan”) is not used by the unsecured creditors of AIG to roll off their exposure and run out of AIG scot free? Short of such a stay the apparent seniority of the government claims implies that any short term creditor of AIG should cut off its exposure and run. And if instead (“if” because again the Fed has not given any details on this crucial issue) the government claims are ensured by an effective stay on such creditors’ roll off then why did the government intervene in AIG rather than letting it go into Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 bankruptcy court?

So this is the conundrum of the government intervention in AIG: it was made to avoid a disorderly collapse of AIG with the provision of short term liquidity; but in order to avoid short term creditors of AIG to run and be full on their claims you need to impose an effective stay on such claims; otherwise some creditors are bailed out (those with short term claims who can run) and some creditors are whacked even more (those with longer term claims that are junior to the government) and such short term creditors become effectively senior to the government. But if the government has to be truly senior relative to all of the creditors of AIG you need to impose a stay on all creditors. And if you impose such a stay you whack all creditors, you impose losses on all the AIG debt holders and you risk the systemic panic and disaster that you wanted to avoid in the first place.

If this is the case it would have been better to push formally AIG in Chapter 11 or 7 bankruptcy court and then provide the government financial support in the form of traditional debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing. If this had been done such DIP financing would be formally – as provision of new money – senior to all of the other claims on the firm. So the government decision to avoid formal Chapter 11 (or 7) is puzzling: either the go
vernment loan is truly senior to all of the claims of AIG – in which case you need a formal stay to avoid short term creditors to run away (but such stay will impose the same potential systemic risks of a formal bankruptcy) – or if such a stay is not imposed then the government claims are junior to those of the short term creditors of AIG and the objective of avoiding a run on the claims of AIG cannot be avoided.

In the case of IMF loans to distressed governments such loans have effective – but not de jure – seniority over the claims of other foreign creditors of the country but the objective of such loans – in cases of illiquidity not insolvency – is to allow the roll off of short term claims of a solvent but illiquid sovereign under the assumption that financing the capital flight will stabilize the problem and stop, at some point, the run (“Catalytic finance”) (for more on this matter and issues of seniority of claims in sovereign debt crises see the book I wrote in 2004 with Brad Setser on “Bailouts versus Bailins: Responding to Financial Crises in Emerging Markets”). But in the case of AIG we have a problem of solvency and the need for an orderly wind down of AIG so as to prevent a global systemic crisis. So it is rational for short term claimants of AIG to run if their claims are junior to those of the government. And if instead those claims were not junior (i.e. a stay is formally imposed) the systemic effects of such a stay will cause massive losses to all of the creditors of AIG and will thus not prevent the systemic crisis that the government intervention was meant to avoid.

The reality is that it would have been more honest and clean and proper to take AIG to bankruptcy court and then provide the government support (the $85 billion loan) in the form of a formal debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing. Why was this solution not taken? It is not clear. Going to court may imply a credit event that triggers formal default and consequences for creditors and CDS holders and the guarantees made by AG on toxic fixed income securities. But what has happened is effectively a credit event and such triggers should be occurring regardless of whether AIG goes into formal bankruptcy court or not. The Fed and Treasury should immediately clarify on whether their intervention includes or not a formal stay on all the creditors of AIG including the holders of the short term claims against AIG.

Any fuzziness and lack of transparency on this matter would be severely destabilizing for markets and investors. To truly safeguard the government claims such a stay should be imposed; and it is not imposed the government action will allow short term creditors of AIG to run scot free with two consequences: the government claims will be at risk putting taxpayers’ money at risk; and the claims of longer term creditors of AIG will be whacked more down the line as short term creditors were allowed to be bailed out. But in that case why should different creditors of AIG be treated differently with some being bailed out and some not and with the consequence that the bailout of some implies much bigger losses to the longer term creditors of AIG? Again a formal bankruptcy court would have allowed a more fair process for allocating losses between shareholders and short term and long term creditors of the firm.

The Fed statement is also fuzzy on the claims of the insurance policy holders of AIG. Are these insurance contracts junior or senior to the government claims? You may think that holders of standard insurance (life, casualty, etc.) should be treated as senior (in the same way as small depositors of banks are insured from loss)? But should only such policy holders (individuals and non-financial firms) should be bailed out and be senior or should also the holders of AIG insurance of fixed income assets (hundreds of billions of dollars of such insurance) be bailed out? If all of such insurance contracts are safe and made whole by the government why should the government bail out investors that bought insurance of toxic products (MBS, CDOs, etc) from AIG? There is no rationale for that.

If we start bailing out those creditors of AIG (holders of bond insurance policies) we may as well nationalize also all of the other private monoline insurers. And we treat differently different bond insurers (we make whole those who bought bond insurance from a too big to fail AIG and we let go bust those who bought the same protections for a non-systemically important bond insurer) we exacerbate moral hazard as in the future no one will buy bond insurance protection from truly private and smaller bond insurers and everyone will buy it from large too-big-to-fail institutions such as AIG where such bond insurance comes now with the additional protection of an implicit government guarantee of insurance. So the US government may become – on top of the biggest insurer in the world with its takeover of AIG – also the biggest re-insurer in the world.

And how will the government decision to protect fully the small insured claimants of AIG (those who hold life and casualty insurance) affect the competition in the insurance business? If the government makes such policy holders senior to the government large and too big to fail private insurer have a massive competitive advantage relative to smaller insurance companies where the claims of the policy holders are at greater risk if the insurance company goes bust?

And, as in the case of banks involved in mortgages, where were the insurance regulators that were asleep at the wheel while AIG was using the policy holders premia not to invest into safe long term bonds but rather to insure toxic MBS and CDOs and other junk? Why were they asleep at the wheel while AIG was conducting the scam of the century getting involved into a business – bond insurance – that was toxic and caused its demise? Why was AIG allowed to become too-big-to-fail but letting it get into a business – bond insurance – where it should have not been in the first place and that caused its current bankruptcy?

So there are tons of questions that remain to be answered and the pathetic Fed statement of the Fed on the takeover of AIG does not answer creating much greater uncertainty and confusion. AIG should have been allowed to go into bankruptcy court and any government financial help to avoid systemic risk should have occurred in the form of a formal debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing. Bankruptcy court have laws and a judicial history of how claims of an insolvent firm are treated and they provide clarity to the pecking order of such claims while avoiding – via a stay – some creditors running and be made whole while others are inflicted – because of such a run – even greater losses. So instead of doing the right thing – pushing AIG into bankruptcy court and providing government DIP financing – the Fed and Treasury have formally nationalized AIG and they have created a legal mess where there will be endless confusion and lack of transparency of the government claims relative to junior and senior creditors of AIG, short term creditors and long term creditors, insurance policy holders of a traditional sort and of a non-traditional sort (life and casualty holders versus bond insurance holders).

And by nationalizing AIG the government that two days ago drew a line in the sand on no more bailout with its decision to let Lehman to go bust has now opened again the floodgates of moral hazard and of private firms’ demands to be bailed out. Already Ford and GM are requesting loans guarantees and Congress is considering them. Next will be airlines and lots of other non-financial corporate who expect now the government to bail them out. The argument of the supplicants will be: “If we are bailing out Wall Street firms such as Bear, Fannie and Freddie, AIG and soon enough banks why shouldn’t we bail out Main Street firm such as Ford and GM that are also systemic ally important? After all Bear was em
ploying only 20 thousands or so folks while Ford and GM have hundreds of thousands of employees.”

So soon enough the transformation the USA into the USSRA (United Socialist State Republic of America) will be complete: we have defeated the USSRR to create a communist economy in the most advanced free market economy in the world. And calling it socialism (even socialism for the rich, the well connected and Wall Street) is giving a bad name even to a failed experiment like socialism; this is more akin to the creation of a corporatist state (like the Italian fascism or the Germany Third Reich) where private sector interest are protected (gains privatized and losses socialized) where the government is taken over by corrupt and reckless private interests.

The paradox is that this this whole mess was creaete by a bunch of zealot fanatics who believed in the laissez faire ideology of free markets unbound by propers rules, regulation and supervision. As I wrote after the nationalization of Fannie and Freddie:

This biggest bailout and nationalization in human history [Fannie and Freddie] comes from the most fanatically and ideologically zealot free-market laissez-faire administration in US history. These are the folks who for years spewed the rhetoric of free markets and cutting down government intervention in economic affairs. But they were so fanatically ideological about free markets that they did not realize that financial and other markets without proper rules, supervision and regulation are like a jungle where greed – untempered by fear of loss or of punishment – leads to credit bubbles and asset bubbles and manias and eventual bust and panics.

The ideologue “regulators” who literally held a chain saw at a public event to smash “unnecessary regulations” are now communists nationalizing private firms and socializing their losses: the bailout of the Bear Stearns creditors, the bailout of Fannie and Freddie, the use of the Fed balance sheet (hundreds of billions of safe US Treasuries swapped for junk toxic illiquid private securities), the use of the other GSEs (the Federal Home Loan Bank system) to provide hundreds of billions of dollars of “liquidity” to distressed, illiquid and insolvent mortgage lenders, the use of the SEC to manipulate the stock market (restrictions on short sales), the use of the US Treasury to manipulate the mortgage market (Treasury will now for the first time outright buy agency MBS to manipulate and prop up this market), the creation of a whole host of new bailout facilities (TAF, TSLF, PDCF) to prop and rescue banks and, for the first time since the Great Depression, to bail out non-bank financial institutions, and a whole range of other executive and legislative actions (including the recent bill to provide a public guarantee to mortgage for banks willing to reduce their face value).

This is the biggest and most socialist government intervention in economic affairs since the formation of the Soviet Union and Communist China. So foreign investors are now welcome to the USSRA (the United Socialist State Republic of America) where they can earn fat spreads relative to Treasuries on agency debt and never face any credit risks (not even the subordinated debt holders who made a fortune yesterday as those claims were also made whole).

Like scores of evangelists and hypocrites and moralists who spew and praise family values and pretend to be holier than thou and are then regularly caught cheating or cross dressing or found to be perverts these Bush hypocrites who spewed for years the glory of unfettered wild west laissez faire jungle capitalism (and never believed in any sensible and appropriate regulation and supervision of financial markets) allowed the biggest debt bubble ever to fester without any control, have caused the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression and are now forced to perform the biggest government intervention and nationalizations in the recent history of humanity, all for the benefit of the rich and the well connected. So Comrades Bush and Paulson and Bernanke will rightly pass to the history books as a troika of Bolsheviks who turned the USA into the USSRA. Fanatic zealots of any religion are always pests that cause havoc and destruction with their inflexible fanaticism; but they usually don’t run the biggest economy in the world. But these laissez faire voodoo-economics zealots in charge of the USA have now caused the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression and the nastiest economic crisis in decades. So let them be shamed in public for their hypocrisy and zealotry that has caused so much financial and economic damage.

 

 

 

And here are links to several segments of an interview I gave to CNBC Asia last night on the subject of the AIG bailout (this was before the formal Fed announcement of the AIG nationalization):

September 15, 2008: CNBC – “Socialism” on Wall Street   (click for video)

There is a huge “moral hazard” problem here, says Nouriel Roubini, co-founder & chairman of RGE Monitor, where Wall Street firms have privatized their profits and socialized their losses. He tells CNBC’s Martin Soong, Sri Jegarajah & Amanda Drury more.

cnbcsept15part1.jpg

 

We could see credits losses of up to $2 trilli
on before this financial crisis is over, predicts Nouriel Roubini, co-founder & chairman of RGE Monitor. He speaks to Michael Sheldon of RDM Financial Group, CNBC’s Amanda Drury, Sri Jegarajah & Martin Soong.

cnbcsept15part2.jpg

Is the Fed’s decision to help AIG a good idea? Nouriel Roubini, co-founder & chairman of RGE Monitor and Michael Sheldon, chief investment strategist at RDM Financial Group share their differing views, with CNBC’s Martin Soong.

cnbcsept15part3.jpg

September 18, 2008: CNBC – Credit Market Pressure (click for video)

squashbossept182008.jpg

September 18, 2008: Discussing the Dollar (click for video)

squashbossept182008part2.jpg

September 18, 2008: Fear Grips Financials (click for video) (Morgan Stanley saw its lowest day in 15 years, with Mike Holland, Holland & Company; Nouriel Roubini, RGEMonitor.com and Doug Cliggot, Dover Management)

squashbossept182008part3.jpg

708 Responses to “The transformation of the USA into the USSRA (United Socialist State Republic of America) continues at full speed with the nationalization of AIG”

Free TibetSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:12 am

I’m in awe. We truely awake to a new world. This will be discussed for weeks and I’m sure I won’t have a better explanation than that above. Thank you.

MarcoSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:12 am

“this is more akin to the creation of a corporatist state (like the Italian fascism or the Germany Third Reich) where private sector interest are protected (gains privatized and losses socialized) where the government is taken over by corrupt and reckless private interests”A B S O L U T E L Y T R U EBravo Professor Roubini(ahem… and what about the neocon cabal, its trotstkist roots, and 80-90 % jew-(oops!)-component?)

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:14 am

Socialism without things that might actually benefit people like such as healthcare . This sees more like fascism to me . Whatever it is called , the American people are getting in deeper trouble when decisions like this are being made.

jomosSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:25 am

This “New World Order” as defined in H.G.Wells 1939 book and espoused by George H.W.Bush is making unrelenting progress towards it’s desire to destroy the freedom generating machine of the former United States before this president leaves office. Read the book!. It is the plan of attack from Sirs Huxley,Wells and Madame Sanger to Money masters of the world today.

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:26 am

THE UNITED STATES SOVREIGN DEBT FUNDCharter members:FannieFreddieAIGCongratulations to all of you!! We are looking forward to many new members soon.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:26 am

Once upon a time the US made widgets and now the widgets are made in China. The US became a financial services economy and does not seem to be doing too well at that task. The winners are “too big to fail” and well-connected with the political establishment. The losers are “too little to make a difference.” The end result will be a worthless dollar and a banana republic.

charlieSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:26 am

Clearly Paulson, Bernanke, the whole bush administration doesn’t care about tax payers.By the way, where is Bush? My guess is the republican party wants him to stay quiet. He might show how truly clueless he is about economic issues. I suspect McCain and Obama are equally as clueless.I don’t see how AIG can recover from this. They have to pay 850bp over Libor on the loan. So, best case, maybe they pay 10% interest. They’re going to lose business. Who will buy insurance from them going forward?I agree the best solution would be to allow them to formally file for bankruptcy and the treasury provide DIP funds.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:32 am

while other countries sovereign funds create wealth, the U.S. counterpart creates debt. Debt, debt, and more debt.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:34 am

actually bananas should be worth far more than U.S. dollars. You can at least eat them (ok, you can eat U.S. dollars too, but they do not taste nice).

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:34 am

THE JAPANIFICATION OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMYThe ramifications: An 80% drop in the stock market and 20 years without the market recovering. Actually its probably worse than that.

johnSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:37 am

Exactly right Nouriel in the reasons for this shambles. That said I don’t think they had any alternative but to rescue BS, F/F and AIG because at the end of the day the main sufferers from the shambles created by Bush, Norquist, the ed board of the WSJ, Cheney and all the other idiots, would have been middle America. It was fortunate that in Paulson you got a realist not a nut case.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:37 am

and all of this in good time before the President is out of the office, talk about good timing. This whole crisis was probably purposely created by some folks somewhere in the upper echelons of the current administration.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:39 am

ah, I wish that the American economy was Japanified. At least then they would be able to sustain have multiple automobile manufacturers in one country.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:39 am

I’d take a bet that one or more of the big investment banks or clearing banks would collapse because of AIG’s (w)reckless derivative portfolio. Also likely money market funds have AIG short term paper. And the insurance policy holders capital backing claims may not be as ‘safe’ as folks suspect.A stay on claims and DIP financing seems to be best, but I suggest the latter reasons prevailed for now. This is election time. AIG can well likely have more liabilities at this point than assets. I don’t buy that it is mark to market acctg that got them here. Classic long illiquid and short cash squeeze.The ‘hold to maturity’ mantra cry entails hoping for lots of inflation to bail my sorry !@#!@ out…

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 6:56 am

Nouriel,great analysis of the FED loan. So once we get the details we might discover that as martin said ‘it’s not a bailout, it’s just a loan’. Pure liquidity injection. Mush ado about nothing?

Branko Stojanovic, BelgradeSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:32 am

I must say I’m amazed!10 times a day on TV, two excellent articles a day on average!Mr Roubini, do you have any sleep last days?You definitely deserve to be much more known name in economical science!We, your ardent blog readers, expect new books from you.

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:35 am

Oh, sure, let’s engage in Jew-bashing now. Please keep stupid anti-semitic comments like that to yourself.SWK

SiftedSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:41 am

I agree, this has more of a fascist tint to it than Marxist, especially when taken in total with the “patriot act” and “homeland security”. Regardless they’re both different sides of the same coin.

Massimiliano ClapsSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:58 am

Dear Prof. Roubini,as usual I read your posts with great interest, and your opinion seems every day more reliable, because you correctly predicted all of this crisis.The similarities with what is currently happening in my country (Italy) are startling. And I’m sure you know them well. Alitalia, our “flagship” airline, being split into two corporations: the GOOD ONE will inherit all assets (the few good airplanes and the 30,000 employees’ skills, minus some “workforce reduction”) and will be merged to its only national competitor, Airone, with financing from some of the largest banks; whilst the BAD ONE will acquire all debts, which will be paid by the State (aka our taxpayer money).In essence, our recently elected right-wing government, which campaigned heavily against a deal with AirFrance-KLM, is now socializing losses and privatizing profits. It is salvaging a private company, Airone, which was also on the brink of bankruptcy. It is downsizing Alitalia to a tier 2 airline that will monopolize the Milano-Roma route, but have an anemic role in the international passengers and freight market. Customers will pay three times: for the bad company through taxes, for monopolistic pricing, for the lack of direct connections with foreign markets and tourist destinations.The size of the Alitalia crisis is nowhere near the one of Freddie, Fannie, Lehman, AIG…, but it clearly shows an inclination of right-wing laissez-fair freaks for shaping our economies the wrong way. At least the Chavez, Putin and Morales of this world have nationalized (or are about to) corporations dealing with natural resources, and, even when factoring-in heavy corruption in those countries, their citizens will eventually get a slice of those profits. We only get the debts and give the message to corporate hawks that all safety nets are there for them to do whatever they want.John Maynard Keynes, John Kenneth Galbraith and even Adam Smith (to anyone that has read The Wealth of Nations, it is crystal clear that the invisible hand was craftily tweaked by Friedmanites) would not be proud of us!Thank you for your great job.Max

Free TibetSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:59 am

Right. The MSM is calling this a bailout. It is not. This is a “loan” but it looks like equity. Both collateral and warrants. The govt. hires & fires – they’ve already shown they can do that. And they can buy or sell assets.The professor is right. It is 80% nationalization. Why 80%? I don’t know either. The GSE’s were done the same way and there was talk at that time that it had to do with keeping the accounting off the Fed’s balance sheet. True? Then the GAO said it should go on the balance sheet anyway. I would think it will become a real problem if the troika wants to make the Fed a black box. A bad bank. So, I’m asking the same question as the professor. Why not 100%? But there may be reasons to do what they’re doing that I don’t understand.It should be considered also that they may have no intention of “saving” AIG. The govt. can liquidate the whole enterprise. At its leisure. The question then becomes, if AIG is insolvent can the govt. $80b loan be recovered? These are just first thoughts. I don’t pretend to have any real knowledge of the govt.’s intentions. Who does?

TaxpayerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:09 am

“The paradox is that this this whole mess was created by a bunch of zealot fanatics who believed in the laissez faire ideology of free markets unbound by proper rules, regulation and supervision.”Regulation will only get us so far, the present tragedy is evidence of that.Regulation has its place but can never be the whole answer, it tends to be prescriptive, complex and inflexible.Not a good combination for a dynamic entity like a market.Consideration of the nature of this entity we call the market is necessary if we want to do better next time.One could argue that the market is a commons, that is a resource that we have access to.Treating the market as one might yield improvements in its function and utility.A market is subject to the same pitfalls as any other commons, it can be mismanaged and cease to be productive.However is possible to utilize a commons in a way that amounts to something more than a plundering free for all.The traditional remedies to abuse are management principles that take into account the sustainable yield limits of the common in question, we call it husbandry.Regulation takes its place among the other tools in the managers bag.Management of a commons also involves some limits on what an individual can take from the commons.The contemporary remedy for over exploited commons is privatisation and domestication where over exploitation becomes a liability for the owner.Who takes responsibility now when the market fails?If no one puts their hand up that means have neither effective communal management or responsible private owners.The commons is left to the ravages of nature including our own and no use to man or beast.Practices that might distort how the commons functions need attentive monitoring.Speculation and derivatives could be considered to be among those things that make the market commons dysfunctional

mammonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:15 am

Dear Professor:Your expertisse in IMF sovereign loans is the key to your understanding this orgy of financial raping of the taxpayer. This Fed intervention is reminiscent of the IMF loan to Yeltsin, and the subsequent looting of the money by the oligarchs who took the IMF money and ran. The parallels of insiders reaping great rewards and leaving the country with the money are striking. The Soviet shock therapy to capitalism transition was an unregulated law of the jungle and survival of greediest melee. The Americanshock therapy dogmatic deregulation after Reagan provided the same opportunities, but in a slower format. The reason it was slower was that there wasmore money to be stolen. The American Deregulation Conis the biggest heist in the history of mankind. Thisheist will keep on going until true national civic policy to protect the Nation is instituted. Both parties must discover civic duty. It it pathetic that the Mccain motto is “Nation First”, when we know thatPhil Gramm is behind him. The present DEREGULATIONDOGMA must be stopped cold.

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:17 am

Professor Roubini:I particularly enjoyed your blog entry for today. Very interesting analysis of the bankruptcy alternative.You wrote:>It is likely that AIG’s shareholders (both preferred and common) may be substantially wiped out; but then why does the government take only a 80% equity share in AIG? Why not 100% as it should? So, if by miracle, AIG is not liquidated, such private shareholders instead of being fully wiped out get any upside benefit from this government action.I imagine this to be the product of a quest for plausible denial: by taking only 80% of shares in connection with a conservatorship, rather than 100% in a receivership, the government can disclaim any suggestion that it has socialized/nationalized anything. I can see no other rational explanation from a legal or business standpoint.As for the reasons to pursue this $85 billion loan for equity plan in lieu of allowing AIG to declare bankruptcy as any ordinary business corporation in its position might be obliged to do, it seems to me that there must have been concerns that a bankruptcy filing would have been worse from a public relations standpoint that a prop-up by the Fed and the Treasury; that is to say, perhaps there was a fear that a traditional bankruptcy filing by AIG would alone have precipitated a global panic and collapse, particularly with respect to the concentration of credit default swap paper in AIG. Again, everything the Fed and the Treasury do in response to each new adverse financial event seems to be as much about managing worldwide public perception — however misguided the public relations “solutions” they concoct may be — as anything else. I agree with you that it would have made more sense from a legal and business standpoint for the Fed to have loaned money to AIG only AFTER a Chapter 11 filing had been initiated.SWK

London BankerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:21 am

@ Professor RoubiniYour “USSRA” was quoted with approval on FTAlphaville this morning as they covered the most recent US corporatist machinations. You are their hero – and ours, of course.They were going nuts over there this morning about Treasury/FSA/Bank of England intervention in the markets as news of a deal for Lloyds TSB to acquire HBOS was leaked to the BBC without official confirmation through the Regulatory News Service administered by the London Stock Exchange. Commenters were severely unhappy with the creation of a “false market” in shares of both banks. If it was done by the authorities here – taking a page from Tim Geithner’s well thumbed US handbook on shearing the shorts – it marks a new low in integrity of UK regulators. The team put out a mock announcement on the replacement of the FSA for breaking its own rules.For more than 300 years the Exchange maintained strict controls over publication of information in the interests of maintaining market integrity. The authority and rule making recently transferred to the FSA, and now we see official rigging of the markets. Bring back mutuality, I say, as those in the market have the strongest interest in keeping it clean.HBOS finally confirmed it is advanced talks that “may or may not” lead to an offer.

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:26 am

The most stunning thing I have ever read in the Wall Street Journal appeared in the lead to a first-page article yesterday:”More than 200 years after it was born at the base of a buttonwood tree, Wall Street as we have known it is ceasing to exist.”Now, you don’t see something like THAT every day in the WSJ!SWK

EricSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:27 am

Dear Mr. Roubini,Your anger is understandable, all this looks so far apart from the US traditional image.But isn’t it because the US is no longer in an era of choices but more in an era of consequences? Big empires fall one day and it doesn’t hapen only in history books.I guess the question now is: how large the US liability column can get before it collapses under it’s own weight?

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:31 am

“The Markets They Are A-Changin’”(to the melody by Bob Dylan)Come gather round ‘bankers’Wherever you roamAnd admit that the watersAround you have grownAnd accept it that soonYou’ll be told to go homeIf your job to youIs worth savin’Then you better start swimmin’Or you’ll sink like the DOWFor the markets they are a-changin’.Come hedgefunds and bear tradersWho prophesize and sell shortAnd keep your eyes wideThe chance won’t come againAnd don’t speak too soonFor the markets still in spinAnd there’s no tellin’ whoThat it’s namin’For the markets they are a-changin’.Come senators, congressmenPlease heed the callDon’t stand in the doorwayDon’t block up the hallFor he that gets hurtWill be he who has stalledThere’s financial meltdown outsideAnd it is ragin’It’ll soon shake your windowsAnd rattle your wallsFor the markets they are a-changin’.Come Central BankersThroughout the landAnd don’t criticizeWhat you can’t understandThose derivative booksAre beyond your commandThe old road isRapidly agin’Please get out Bernanke and PaulsenIf you must bail them out outFor the markets they are a-changin’.

devils advocateSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:32 am

Please get a good night’s sleep -you’re one of the few honest observers brave enough to speak outdon’t stress the mothers of all bailouts -you can do anything so long as you have your healthso take a “staycation”

JoshuaSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:36 am

Marco,On the other hand, we could talk about such things as the 37% of American Nobel Prize winners who are Jewish or the fact that over 40% of all large gifts to charity in the U.S. are made by Jews.There is little question of course on what particular lists your relatives and friends can be found: rolls of welfare recipients, trailer park residents and prison inmates.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 8:38 am

If the loan is senior to other debf (not the ‘if’) this is no bailout of anybody. AIG sure has $85bn of good assets amon their $1tn so this is could be a bridge loan. The only who are bailed out are short term creditors. All other creditors could be behind the government in a BK liquidation. This is completely different from the Mac & Mae preferred stocks. Remember the ‘if’.Hell! I should not understand this things, I’m a physicist!

villagerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:40 am

I realize that Nouriel is criticizing the detail of the government’s support for AIG and not necessarily the need for its support. For those who are like me and wondering why the government felt the need for its support, the following provides an explanation. It is copied from an article in the Asian times …”When the US Federal Reserve cut interest rates aggressively after the dotcom bubble burst, thereby ushering in a housing bubble, it also materially changed the returns against risk of all financial instruments. Simply put, the return on ‘risk free’ money, that is lending to the government, fell so far that all investors needing that source of income (pensioners and the like) suddenly found themselves short-changed. Insurance companies had come to depend on bond market returns, and therefore felt the heat more than any other player in the financial industry.The decline of stock prices in the post-dotcom period also hurt insurance companies, forcing them (and their regulators) to increase the purchases of bonds instead; as noted above, this was exactly at the time when bond returns were being pushed down by the Fed, thereby forcing a greater decline in yields.Eventually, this was to produce the ‘Greenspan conundrum’ – long-term bond yields refused to rise much even as the Fed raised interest rates. That conundrum should have been the biggest warning to regulatory authorities in the US, but what with all the consulting contracts going around, there wasn’t enough attention or alarm raised about the matter.Anyway, this forced insurance companies to go looking for other ‘risk free’ alternatives, which is where the whole triple-A malarkey of structured credit assets (CDOs, ABS, MBS and so on) came about. These securities, offering the same credit rating as the US government, came with higher yields and so were perfect for insurance companies and other ratings-constrained investors.The other development was in the area of credit default swaps (CDS), which are really insurance contracts on the likelihood of defaults. If as a banker, you worried that there was simply too much exposure to large companies in your portfolio (and this cost you a lot of capital), you bought protection (insurance) through a CDS from another financial institution, say a foreign bank or an insurer.Soon enough, the selling of insurance on defaults became a major business for these counterparties. Much like the losses of European banks have been bigger than those of US banks in the American subprime crisis due to their participation in such contracts, insurance companies also suffered similar losses. However, unlike banks they are not required to mark their books to market, and therefore could hide the problems for longer than the banks could, which is why the troubles of AIG are coming to light now, rather than a year ago.Ultimately, this is the reason for the Fed to step in and rescue AIG. Banks that reported that they are fully hedged on their various exposures to US subprime, problem assets, and corporate defaults all had bought protection using CDS from companies like AIG, which itself is estimated to have sold some $500 billion in credit protection overall.If the value of that protection evaporates because the person selling it to you has defaulted (as in the case of Lehman), then your “original” exposure is back on your books, needing a capital increase. Given that many global banks are already reporting tangible equity against assets of far less than 5%, the AIG hit would have been a bit too much for the system.”

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:41 am

that is good to know. Who knows how bad the situation gets, one day there may be no food left, only billions upon billions of worthless dollar bills from the government printing presses.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:49 am

anti-semitism is a sensitive issue, Marco. As you can see you are now being accused of being in the same group with welfare recipients, trailer park residents and prison inmates.

mammonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:50 am

The professor is a one man Reform Party. In the age of the Internet, his clarity could spark clear thinking in the land of Obfuscation. Hiscontribution to Democracy is the land of “Feaux Television Democracy” is priceless. He drawssustinence from his honesty. He is not “stressingthe mother of all bailouts”. He is warning us tobecome active participants in the democratic process, or we will lose our livelihoods and freedom. More important! Our children’s future is in jeopardy. He is in a good spiritual place and there is no stress there!

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:54 am

hmmm…soon it might be out of question to short U.S. companies.The next thing they do is for the government to buy stock in other U.S. companies as well. They can then create their own stock rally.

Free TibetSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:00 am

Alessandro, yes but the professor is no doubt right that it won’t stop the run. So, what’s the point?I was about to ask him to take my post down as it doesn’t add anything to his already thorough analysis.

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:03 am

> I realize that Nouriel is criticizing the detail of the government’s support for AIG and not necessarily the need for its support.Absolutely. It is criticism of how it has been handled and an explanation as to why the means chosen may be less effective that they could be, if they are effective at all (which remains to be seen).SWK

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:04 am

First, I flipped on Yahoo News and the first line item I read was … “Fed bails out troubled AIG with $85 billion of taxpayer money”.My reaction – you’ve got to be kidding.Second, the situation in the markets right now reminds me a lot of the time back in 1987 before the big October crash. At that time, during Sep and Oct there were some big swings in volatility in the Dow. The swings came about because investors were very nervous about a possible collapse, then every so often the market would decide that “everything is alright” and bounce up again. We’re seeing that phenomenon again now. Back in 1987 one of the big drivers of the crash was “portfolio insurance”. Brokers had implemented a scheme whereby stock portfolio’s were supposedly insured in value through hedging transactions in the futures markets. Of course, the whole scheme only works if losses can be kept modest and predictable in nature. The market tore apart initially in the Chicago futures markets when the scheme began to break down. This time in 2008 the issue is not stock insurance … it’s bond insurance. The market is now very nervous about a possible collapse in the CDS market. Different asset – but the same underlying issue. The insurance on bond values just can’t be paid up when losses become large and unpredictable in the system.Moral of the story. Watch out.PeteCA

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:10 am

ptm: “What’s up with gold? Up $15 in a few minutes and nothing happening with the dollar or oil!?! “And by the way … gold is diverging from oil and the dollar. No need to explain why. Uncle Sam really is going to print money now.PeteCA

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 9:11 am

TREASURY BILL SALES TO BE LIKE CASH MANAGEMENT BILLSTREASURY TO PROVIDE ADVANCE NOTICE ON SALESTREASURY BILL SALES TO PROVIDE CASH FOR USE IN FED INITIATITREASURY PLANS SPECIAL SERIES OF BILL AUCTIONS TO HELP FEDU.S. TREASURY TO ISSUE DEBT TO EXPAND FED’S BALANCE SHEETNext bailout?THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK!

London BankerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:12 am

@ PeteCAThis is one of the best analogies I’ve read yet to put the current crisis in context. You are right that the reliance on derivatives to hedge equity risk in 1987 is much the same as the reliance on CDS to hedge fixed income risk today. The 1987 market crash spiralled downward as the feedback loop between New York and Chicago forced both markets to trade down in tandem. Similarly, a default in the CDS markets would lead to a massive sell off (or re-valuation) in fixed income securities markets – and mass insolvency in the financial sector.Thanks for explicitly linking the two eras so cogently.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:13 am

This mess was caused by free market zealots ? Give me a break !!!! Barney Frank and Chuck Shumer had more to do with Fannie and Freddie than any republicans. How does the Professor deal with that fact ? I love your analysis but it is tainted by the Bush Hatred syndrome

London BankerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:19 am

Via FT Alphaville: The Fed’s Run Out of Money

Seriously. It’s broke. Here’s the statement from the US Treasury:
The Federal Reserve has announced a series of lending and liquidity initiatives during the past several quarters intended to address heightened liquidity pressures in the financial market, including enhancing its liquidity facilities this week. To manage the balance sheet impact of these efforts, the Federal Reserve has taken a number of actions, including redeeming and selling securities from the System Open Market Account portfolio.The Treasury Department announced today the initiation of a temporary Supplementary Financing Program at the request of the Federal Reserve. The program will consist of a series of Treasury bills, apart from Treasury’s current borrowing program, which will provide cash for use in the Federal Reserve initiatives.Announcements of and participation in auctions conducted under the Supplementary Financing Program will be governed by existing Treasury auction rules. Treasury will provide as much advance notification as possible regarding the timing, size, and maturity of any bills auctioned for Supplementary Financing Program purposes.’’

Related link:Treasury to provide cash to Fed market liquidity operations – MarketWatch

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:19 am

@ Pete CAI heard a rumor that MS might be “breaking the buck”.(…and others may be too???)This is kinda big news, and probably the cause for the run on gold? (maybe?)Miss America

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 9:21 am

One more hint that Benny and Hanky are resisting the hyper-inflation siren. Let’s hope this plays out better than their ‘no more public bailout’ two-days mantra.

MedicSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:31 am

Yeah…..that’s right this is all Barney Frank’s fault. It’s because he’s not a Christian and he’s gay!!! At least that’s what I heard yesterday on Right-Wing Radio……Hey Guest – come here. Just a little closer……that’s better…YOU ARE A MORON!!!!!! HOW DO YOU FIND YOUR WAY HOME IN THE DARK?!?!?!DO US ALL A BIG FAVOR AND DONT’T REPRODUCE YOU DUMB-ASS!!!!!!!There. I have done my good deed for the day…

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:32 am

If “too big to fail” carries intrinsic moral hazard, shouldn’t such companies be broken up, preferably before the company succumbs to moral hazard, and if not before then after as a remedy rather than leaving the moral hazard in place and the taxpayer holding the bag? This may already be possible under existing antitrust law, but of course it would require an administration willing to enforce the law which we currently do not have. Seems to me it would be healthier to oversee the breakup of AIG and others into a number of small viable companies would be a healthier outcome instead of turning us all into bagholders.

MedicSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:36 am

MA,The run on gold has begun. With the supposed safety of even money market funds now in question, there will be no other means of wealth protection for the average investor. The choice will become (as I have described before): Do I pull my retirement out and pay taxes plus penalty but still walk away with 70% or do I let it fall away and leave empty handed?I know what I chose. Part of something is always better that all of nothing.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:08 am

if oil goes lower – likely to below 90 – gold will likely go lower in short-term but for the long-term it is extremely bullish

snjosephSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:08 am

Thanks to Prof. Roubini for the fascinating post. I’m an extreme amateur on these issues, but could someone discuss the possible impact of AIG’s massive derivatives exposure (esp. CDS)? I understand that derivatives are NOT covered under the automatic stay in bankruptcy–they are not necessarily senior debt, but if, for instance, the counterparty is holding collateral, he’s free to seize it. Also counterparties would be able to book out on any derivatives contracts beneficial to AIG. This may have been why the Fed was trying to avoid letting AIG slip into bankruptcy. Not that it’s any excuse–this whole thing is a disgrace.

MarcoSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:10 am

… Joshua, fortunately my relatives can’t be found in the one million killed and “n” million refugees of Irak … how do you spell h o l o c a u s t when the US is the author ?

Julius ViznerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:10 am

A coworker of mine once postulated that the rich in America enjoy the protection of socialism while it is the poor who are exposed to indifferent capitalism.As a former apparatchik of the state insurance regulatory system, I must say AIG’s demise saddens and surprises me. In 20/20 hindsight, we should have been more aggressive. Clearly, the capital requirements did match the risk borne.

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:15 am

Hey LB, My guess… same as yours. The FED will expand credit to the credit siezures that are swirling. (I’m shocked I haven’t seen a Crammer link yet, with him yelling to open the window)If the buck breaks for real… we’d be in an imediate death spiral! This break appears to be based on “hording”, so the Fed can ease the tension hear (of course at the expense of the USD value). My guess is they’ll be more support this time though? We’ll see.p.s. I liked that wife2k link. very cute.Miss America

crgordonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:23 am

This reminds me of Nixon’s last few months before resignation. One amazing event followed by a bigger amazing event followed by an even bigger amazing event. All of the events were unbelievable. I frankly believe that in this time of financial crisis it would be foolhardy to hold a national election. There is too much systemic risk and it is better for the banking cartel and the Treasury to finance a standing army to ensure domestic and economic tranquility. Of course, the measures would be temporary.

London BankerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:27 am

Is that a tip to go long Blackwater futures?I’m already on record saying that I expect bombs, assassinations and small wars all over the world to spur a flight to dollars and US markets. The bomb which killed 4 security guards at the US embassy in Yemen this morning fits all too well to the pattern already emerging over recent weeks.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:30 am

Most of AIG derivative contracts are safe harbored under the Bankruptcy Code and therefore not subject to the automatic stay. Upon the bankrutpcy filing, the counterparties could liquidate their contracts. Of course, the counterparties’ claims for any deficiences (after netting out) would be stayed by the filing, but that does not change the fact that the derivative contracts would be terminated and the counterparties would become unhedged.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:32 am

By Chuck Jaffe, MarketWatchLast update: 9:40 p.m. EDT Sept. 16, 2008BOSTON (MarketWatch) As if the financial news wasn’t bad enough with the big-name, old-line brokerage and financial services business on the rocks, investors now have one more scary concern to deal with.After the market closed Tuesday, a money-market mutual fund called Reserve Primary did the unthinkable and “broke the buck.” Investors expecting a constant share price and consistent yield finished the day wondering why their shares were worth just 97 cents, and whether the loss could get worse.

bythewaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:33 am

Maybe the target of this game is, that President Bush is preparing to declare an ‘Economic Emergency’ during the week of October 5th and elections are history, forever.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:37 am

Prof. Roubini is critical of both Republicans and Democrats. However the blame lays with the current administration. Someone with conservative leanings (who may or may not be let politics color their vision) might say that it’s unfair to Reagan to blame the current meltdown on the Reagan administration, and that the current administration takes the heat since the generalized subprime crisis happened on Bush’s watch.

Ashu ShuklaSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:42 am

Junta,Thanks to all for you interesting comments.We have been discussing a lot of issues & I was wondering if we could discuss the possible solutions to this problem.Prof. Roubini pointed that the US gov. should fund the partially fund the declining home equity, should fix the variable interest rates and shud put money into the pockets of home loaners.Now, I don;t think that is a viable option as the treasury has to debt finance (nearly 1 – 2 Trillion $). Moreover, if this is done the problem will escalate as there will be another short term boom in housing mkt vis-a-vis the US economy. It will only prolong the asset bubble crisis.Please share your views.Cheers!

Hong Kong fun managerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:43 am

“Maybe the target of this game is, that President Bush is preparing to declare an ‘Economic Emergency’ during the week of October 5th and elections are history, forever.”so Bush will be the Chairman of USSRA.

L. Morgan StanislawSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:44 am

Indeed. An economic model developed with a collaborator, who must remain anonymous, predicts troops in the street. The output of the model abruptly and catastrophically changed from a series of increasingly depressing numbers to the pronouncement that the National Guard would be called out to suppress widespread unrest. Senior citizens on fixed incomes will not be able to purchase meals or pay for utilities.

DownSouthSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:47 am

So welcome to little Mexico! (Or is it big Mexico?)In an interview back in 1990, the Peruvian novelist Mario Vargas Llosa called Mexico the “perfect dictatorship.” It looked like a democracy, headed by a president who could not be re-elected, and was equipped with all the institutional bells and whistles usually found in democracies. But it was in fact not a democracy, but instead an oligarchy ran by a small, powerful elite.So what are the trademarks of a “perfect dictatorship”? They are numerous, but the four main features are:► There is the appearance of political competition, but in reality all political parties are financed by the same oligarchy. In the case of Mexico it was so blatant that at times the oposition parties received their funding directly from the dominant party (the PRI).► The media is owned by or bought off by the oligarchy. In Mexico’s case, instead of censoring the press, the oligarchy kept newspapers afloat- and loyal- with cheap newsprint, floods of government advertising, and generous gifts to journalists.► Government operations, especially those dealing with the economy, are totally opaque. Open meetings are not required, there are few open records laws and those that exist are not enforced.► There is no accountability. Nobody ever goes to prison. Nobody ever loses their ill-gotten gains. As the Mexican writer Carlos Fuentes puts it: “Yet the deeper reason for the crisis has simply to do with democracy in Mexico. The secrecy surrounding our economic realities is related to the absence of something well know in Anglo-Saxon law for which ther is not even a proper term in Spanish: accountability, checks and balances.”In other words, dectatorship is acheived through collaboration, and not coercion.And what are the fruits of the “perfect dictatorship?”► There is one economic crisis after another. Government becomes just one big soap opera.► When crisis strikes, there are always “emergency” measures, always ample talk of “reforms”.► Despite all the flowery rhetoric, nothing ever changes. In each crisis the net effect of the “emergency measures” is the decimation of the middle class and a reconsolidation of the monopolies and stanglehold of the economy held by the oligarchy.So welcome to little Mexico! The irony is that we thought it was the millions of undocumented immigrants from Mexico who posed a threat to the American way of life. But low and behold it wasn’t them at all. They were in fact fleeing the very system that America’s ruling elite is doing everything within its power to impose upon the United States.

IncognitoSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:59 am

What is happening is actually the capital (or equity) erosion in the US. The issue is also related to monetary creation of the system. As a simple example, suppose $100 is deposited in a bank. With a 10% reserve requirement ratio, $100 is transformed into $1000 ($900 of which is the loan value and $100 is the reserve for the loan given by the bank.) The way it can be transformed works in the following way: When $100 is deposited, $90 is given as a loan, and $10 is kept as reserves. $90 loan is then used for purchases by the borrower. This value is thus transferred to someone else. The person (or business) who receives $90 deposits that amount in turn to his/her bank, which transforms $90 deposit into $81 loan and $9 reserves. This may go on till $100 is transformed into a loan value of $900 and a reserve value of $100, hence the total monetary value of $1000.Therefore, for every amount deposited, the total banking system inflates the values through a liability scheme. While loans are the assets of the banking system, they are the liability of the consumers and businesses. A substantial amount has to be paid back otherwise the entire system would collapse. Ability to pay back the loan is the ability to transform credit money (i.e. $900 loan value) into fiat money (i.e. $100 amount deposited originally is an example of fiat money because its presence is backed with real assets that we use in our daily lives). The total money in the market is $1000. Thus, in order to make this value completely free of default risk, we need to be able to create a model where borrowers can pay their debt back. This system implies that, in our economy, when we create money out of thin air, we back the majority of the system with credit money rather than fiat money (true value of money). That is, we spend the future before it’s due.What has happened in the US is that people’s buying power increased with borrowing ability rather than earning ability for the last decade or so. This has happened thanks to the lending obtained from the emerging market countries such as China. What a financial institution needed to do was to be able to obtain a collateral whose accounting value is marked-to-market. For example, people borrowed huge sums of money to buy houses. This in turn increased the house prices. When the house prices increased, the loans gained in value. This in turn led to stronger financial institution balance sheets. Since financial institutions were able to securitize their assets, they hired specialists (Quantitative Analysts – QUANTS) who know how to price these securities based on marked-to-model. In this way, the entire system was made dependent on the value of an asset such as a house. Furthermore, the securities whose values are marked-to-model are as well used as collateral to borrow even more. Financial institutions were able to borrow more, because there was a cash vault such as China that was ready to invest into US securities. So, we see that, in order to create abundant amount of credit money, financial institutions needed: (1) A collateral, (2) A marked-to-market accounting scheme, (3) A marked-to-model pricing scheme, and (4) The song by Louis Armstrong: “What a Wonderful World”.However, the problem is not entirely related to the excess credit. While the liabilities that the businesses and consumers in the US have to pay increased, their equity (the value on which fiat money, or safe money, or money out of which credit is created as mentioned above, depends) decreased; hence the negative saving rate. Thus, we see that the total increase in asset values was mainly dependent on borrowing power rather than earning power, since earning power would be the true reflection of increase in equity. That’s why, this recession will be consumer led, because consumers don’t have the proper earning (or savings) power to pay for the debts. In my view, this crisis will be worse than Great Depression because the main reason is not only based on the presence of excess credit, but also on the value of US equity transferred to emerging markets due to cheap outsourcing possibilities. That is, countries such as China arbitraged countries like US thanks to their cheap labour and production costs.Professor Roubini claims that the losses may amount to 2 Trillion USD. This loss amount is reflection THE EQUITY VALUE that is WIPED out of the system. One also has to consider the value of net exposure this amount backs. ONLY for the CREDIT DERIVATIVES MARKET, the NET EXPOSURE value was 9 Trillion USD in 2007 based on ISDA figures. When we say that losses will be some X amount, we also have to consider the amount that the losses back. In this way, we truly understand what contagion really is. So, if 2 trillion is gone, then what is going to happen to 9 trillion USD. As long as it is not backed by extra-terrestrials, it will be wiped out as well.Second, one may think of the conservation of energy when referring to the credit risk. It can only be alleviated when we increase the equity value of system. That’s why the interruptions by the government officials by printing money are useless because all they do is to leverage the system even more rather than creating true equity. By creating further leverage US (1) delays the inevitable crisis, (2) causes some defaults that were not supposed to happen (this is because with liquidity injections FED provide security to those that were already supposed to default. Due to conservation of energy, the credit problems will be eventually reflected to the others in the market given that a supposedly bank is bailed out. Thus, every bail out will eventually hit someone else in the market since the conservation law is present.) Finally, (3) delaying the crisis might cause a larger contagion in the future since FED artificially changed the path of losses given its bailouts. By helping banks that are supposed to default, FED basically causes them to transfer the wealth from an already existing amount of money in the markets. Those that cannot transfer value will follow the path of Lehman Brother’s.One can claim that by gaining time US can increase its equity and hence alleviate the credit risk. This can only be done if US become advantageous for production again because equity is backed with real production. There are two ways to improve production: (1) Devalue the currency, (2) Invest in technology. In the short run, the only outcome will be currency devaluation because losses are really big and US is out of bullets to protect its system given that the country runs record twin deficits (budget and current account deficits). However, when devaluation happens interest rates will spike and increase the deficits even more. I hope this won’t go to a point where US will default on its own debt. But, I think that, in the medium run, dollar will not be the reserve currency of the world anymore.

crgordonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:01 am

I believe I have touched upon a nerve or two. The absence of outrage makes the two epochs much different. Then (Nixon) people took to the streets. Now (Bush) people are content (with the exception of a simmering few). The deadening of disbelief in the general population is astounding. At least then, we had corageous people in Congress that took a stand and put country before the Imperial Presidency. Those were the good old days – at least for me.LB – I am aligned with your view of what could happen even if not as eloquent in delivery of the message.Morgan – Troops in the streets (remember Kent State?)is not a far-fetched scenario.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:02 am

Oh, thank goodness. When the boogey man Bush leaves office all will be well…we littl’ folk just need to hold on to January. My savings will earn again, me wages will rise! I can stop bailin’ and money monopoly will be no more. Paulson and Bernanke and all those kind international bankers will hold me littl’ hand. Oh, Guest. I will sleep tonight. Thank you, thank you, from the bottom of me littl’ heart, good times is returnin’.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:07 am

My teenager son , who is very interested in government and history pointed me to this “conspiracy” stuff -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dmPchuXIXQ

DownSouthSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:13 am

Banks that reported that they are fully hedged on their various exposures to US subprime, problem assets, and corporate defaults all had bought protection using CDS from companies like AIG, which itself is estimated to have sold some $500 billion in credit protection overall.

So what are you saying, that U.S. taxpayers should become the insurer of last resort and stand behind all that protection?

MASHIACH BEN CHANASeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:19 am

TO MY WEALTHY BROTHERS IN NEW YORK CITY AND MAJOR CITIES AROUND US, TAKE YOUR FAMILIES OUT OF THOSE FANCY FIFTH AVENUE AND PARK AVENUE AND OTHER FANCY BUILDING AROUND US CITIES AND BRING THEM TO THE COUNTRY SIDE. THE MASSES WILL RISE AGAINST THE WEALTHY THERE WILL BE ANARCHY THEY WILL BURN DOWN ALL THE BIG CITIES. UNLIKE GREAT DEPRESSION OF 1930S THIS TIME THE FRUSTRATED US CITIZENS WONT SEAT CALMLY AND LET THEM BE FORECLOSED ON THEIR HOMES OR BE UNEMPLOYED OR GO TO STARVATION, THERE WILL BE A REAL BLOOD BATH WORST THEN 1917 SOVIET BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION.

L. Morgan Stanislaw, 3rdSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:20 am

I wasn’t being facetious: my collaborator, the pseudonymous Christian Marx, and I believe the outcome will be troops in the street. Marx has been investing in gold and predicts a collapse of the dollar. We’re wondering now whether the outcome will be a hyperinflationary depression, or a deflationary depression…there are arguments either way.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:23 am

The devil is always in the details!Hospital can’t file bankruptcyBy Mike PolhamusPublished: Thursday, August 28, 2008 9:11 AM MDTHospital can’t file bankruptcyBy Mike PolhamusTeton Valley Hospital CEO Floyd Bounds Monday told the newly formed hospital board of trustees that Teton Valley Health Care is ineligible for Chapter 9 Bankruptcy.Permitted only to certain types of taxing entities, this option, formerly favored by Bounds, cannot be applied to TVHC as an entity separate from Teton County itself. Research found that the hospital is classified as a “department” of the county, meaning the hospital’s bankruptcy could be accomplished only if the county declares bankruptcy as a whole.Although the long-awaited finding took a distasteful possibility off the table, it also implies even less desirable scenarios. Were the hospital to collapse financially, the county would remain accountable for any outstanding debts. The hospitals debt is now approaching the $4 million mark.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:26 am

Some perspective needs to be added to all this socialism stuff. About 30 years ago the Soviet Union and Hungary discussed jont ventures. The Hungarians said it was a fine idea, but they wanted to be sure of getting a share of the profits. The Soviets were perplexed: the word profit and concept of profit did not exist in Soviet economics. This is not the case in the USA of yesterday, today or in the future. US capitalism will contiunue to flourish. Indeed, when all the fog clears, the “nationalisation” of AIG, Lehman and any others will, with a bit of luck and good sense, leave the Fed, the Treasury and hence the tax payers with a surplus when these assets are re-privatised. But why the authorities don’t simply write down the share capital in any companies taken over to nil is a bit of a mystery.Another thing: it is worth remembering when screaming about how much tax payers are going to have to pay for these rescues that most taxpayers are consumers and wage earners, and if bailing out these giants now can help to keep the unemployment figures from rising too extreme levels in coming months and years, then a lot of tax payers will be thankful.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:32 am

Marco: Professor Roubini’s parents were persian jews… goes to show not only how prejudiced you are, but more evidently, how STUPID.

NoviceSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:33 am

To listen to the presidential candidates talk about more regulation is pathetic, they are both too late!!!I want them to explain to me how they both plan on tax cuts, with all these bailouts! Do they think we are morons? They are so full of election rhetoric! There is no possible way that our taxes will not increase with all this nationalizing of debt. If it wasn’t so serious it would almost be comical to watch the leading candidates try to muddle their way through the mire, while assuring all of us that things are going to be better with them on the throne!maybe we should write you in Nouriel????

friend of washington mutualSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:33 am

I don’t think there will be that many tax payers in near future, because there will not be that much income, for us treasury to collect

mammonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:35 am

@anonymousI respectfully disagree with every single solitary word. These “greed dragons” are in the process of crashing the markets and causing much pain. They will take their lootlike vikings and leave the taxpayer with debt and no health insurance and social benefits. We will be in so much debt that social benefits may be curtailed severely.”tax payers will be thankful.”????????Please analyze the extent of asset inflation that has to be deleveraged. This is serious!

Joe AverageSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:38 am

now wait, there’s nothing the presidential candidates could have done about regulation,it’s not like they are members of congress or anything…

L. Morgan Stanislaw, 3rdSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:41 am

Except for one little nagging detail: usually, when a white knight takes over a company, it shares in the profits if it can turn a distressed venture around. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if, under the taxpayer’s stewardship, AIG suddenly makes a tremendous profit, and the taxpayers, being preferred shareholders, suddenly find themselves eligible to retire under social security at age 30 for the next million years, on account of the astronomical payoff of their investment. Also, the terms of their mortgages should be lowered. Anyone who argues that the masses should be happy just to keep their jobs has an interest in seeing that they continue to finance the outrageous debts they face without relief. That’s too bad, because the economy will not recover until the consumer at last faces relief from its debt. It cannot only be the upper classes that receive relief: if it’s not enough to tax only the wealthy, because they don’t generate enough tax revenue, then it’s not enough to rescue the wealthy.Rather than have the masses keep their lousy jobs, they should resolve not to work for anyone who earns more than an order of magnitude more money than they do. Let the upper classes clean their own toilets.

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:43 am

What I’m saying is that as distasteful as public backstopping of AIG from any risks it may have taken and poor judgment it may have exercised over the last several years, the cost of such bailouts to the taxpayers may be preferable to a disorderly unwinding of the entire global financial and economic system, which will punish the guilty and the innocent alike. Of course, ultimately, all of these federal bailouts — especially given the way they are being handled — may be for naught and everything may come crashing down in a disorderly fashion anyway, but I’m not in any hurry to see that happen and I’m willing to give Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson some leeway to test experimental solutions to what is clearly an unprecedented financial and economic crisis.BTW, I’m from down South myself… ;-) SWK

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:46 am

When you look from the outside to this US election parties, you can easy come to the conclusion that there are many morons in the US.I hope this is not the case.

aleister perduraboSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:51 am

Toborrow and toburrow and tobarrow! That’s our crass, hairy andevergrim life, till one finel howdiedow Bouncer Naster raps on thebell with a bone and his stinkers stank behind him with thesceptre and the hourglass. We may come, touch and go, fromatoms and ifs but we’re presurely destined to be odd’s withoutends.

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:56 am

@ Free Tibet on 2008-09-16 13:36:33“Lo siento guapa. Cuba just isn’t important.”Are you sure you don’t want to rethink that statement???http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26755418/As I stated: By MIss America on 2008-09-16 10:06:45“Fourth: Immediately lift our trade sanctions with Cuba. They are dated. Open a door of trade with their gov’t. Provide them with US automobiles to replace the 1950’s Studebakers they are currently driving. (this can help lift the US auto market a little bit),. In addition, it will remove the potential of having an “enemy” landing strip so close to the US border.”I’m thinking forward.Miss America

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:00 pm

“Profit and concept of profit?” Whose? ”Capitalism will continue to flourish?” What capitalism? “Nationalisation of AIG, Lehman and others…will leave the taxpayers with a surplus?” Come on. Then why didn’t Goldman Sachs buy them — they haven’t left a loose nickel around in decades? A letter to the editor in this morning’s San Francisco Chronicle – “Follow ‘Failed’ Money” — pretty well sums it up:Who is accountable (which means, which bank accounts fattened) from the subprime loan debacle?Big businesses Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been bailed out by big government, fulfilling Karl Marx’s prophecy, “Democracy is the road to socialism.” If this bailout is any omen, the failings of Republicans will again pave the road to change toward a Democrat-controlled government. Republicans – now the party of spend-and-charge – will be replaced with Democrats – the party of tax-and-repay, the other side of the same, stolen coin.However, we should be reminded that white-collar criminals could change political parties as quickly as voters can change their affiliations. Red or blue, we should be reminded that “failed” money does not just vanish, it ends up somewhere. GREG AUSTIN (San Francisco)

JimmyTheBankerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

Why, now that the gaurantee on Phony and Fraudie is “explicit” rather than “implicit”, aren’t banks now being allowed to risk-weight these bonds at 0 rather than 20? Think of how much risk-based capital this could free up in the banking industry! Nouriel, have you heard form anyone on this matter?

JonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:03 pm

I’m still confused. I’ve never heard of a loan where you receive equity. You receive a promise to repay plus interest. Did AIG lack the collateral to secure the loan and so had to practically give itself away? That seems very weird to me.And how can AIG “sell” 79.9% of itself without approval from shareholders? Wouldn’t it be forced to issue massive quantities of new stock, diluting existing shares? Don’t shareholders have a say in that? Or does imminent collapse override that right?

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:14 pm

Priceless — in a nutshell. Our only hope is in the American People. They are always slow to react, but when they do, heads roll. And they are starting to stir…because of hard times and courageous men, such as Nouriel Roubini. Thank you for this lucid comparison.

MarkSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:15 pm

Do people demand a really just system? Well, we’ll arrange it so that they’ll be satisfied with one that’s a little less unjust … They want a revolution, and we’ll give them reforms — lots of reforms; we’ll drown them in reforms. Or rather, we’ll drown them in promises of reforms, because we’ll never give them real ones either!!- DARIO FO, Accidental Death of an Anarchist

iNnOsInZSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

MA,I got this news this morning (from Ignites), not sure if you guys read it already:”Sapped by Lehman, Money Fund Breaks the Buck”And here is something on WSJ:”In a sign of how the financial crisis is hitting small investors, a huge money-market fund, the Reserve Primary Fund, announced Tuesday that it lost money as its net asset value fell below the hallowed $1-per-share level, the first time one of these conservative funds has had a loss in 14 years.”Indeed, MMF’s are breaking the buck.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

“SEC issues rules against abusive short sales”http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/080917/shortselling_sec.htmlNO RULES FOR ABUSIVE LONGS?

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:25 pm

Money-market funds scramble to cool fearsMoney-market funds race to reassure investors that their funds are not in danger of losing money and falling below $1 a share.• Money fund freezes redemptions

MarcoSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:27 pm

Reality is stupid, sir. Because most of the neocons are really of jewish origin.Of course, I don’t dismiss the component of re-bo(MB)rn christians, aka fanta-christians.

AnnSSeptember 17th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

Hmm….Treasury just gave Bennie-boy another few billion to toss around.http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/271257f2-83f1-11dd-bf00-000077b07658.htmlWonderful.We have Bush and Paulson practically reciting the speeches of Herbert Hoover with the “economy is fundamentally sound” nonsense. (My one degree culminates in a specialization in the social, political and economic history of the ’30s.)We have Berneke reaching back and using a statute pass in the July 1932 to nationalize or whatever AIG. A statue that was passed by a Rebpulican COngress at the behest of a Republican President who were all panicked by the financial collapse – and which did not work then.Odd how all the ‘free marketers’ screamed that the Great Depression regulation was passe and the first thing they do when in trouble is latch onto statutes passed to deal with the Great Depression in order to try to save themselves….

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 12:51 pm

folks,3 months T-bills yield less than 0.025% annualized. For what I understand with spells panic.

Charles N. SteeleSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:06 pm

Thanks Dr. Roubini for your heroic work exposing this mess.But a question: I have trouble understanding how laissez-faire can be blamed for this — hasn’t it always been interventionist crony capitalism from the start?Where’s the laissez-faire when the Fed enabled the credit bubbles with absurdly low rates, and actively promoted destruction of underwriting standards e.g. wrt mortgages? In the end, isn’t the crackup due to 1) Fed driven credit expansion, and 2) federal encouragement of irresponsible behavior (along with implicit promises of support in the event of trouble? Not to excuse or deny the role of the financial “geniuses” that cooked up the toxic investment stew, but wasn’t there enormous amounts of aiding-and-abetting from the gov’t?It just seems to me that despite rhetoric, Bush and the Republicans have always been about corrupt crony capitalism, not true laissez faire. In this light, the bailouts socializations don’t seem to me to be an ironic reversal, but a predictable and logical step in this rigged game.

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:13 pm

THERE IS NO FREE LUNCHFrom Kevin Depew:”As it stands, virtually every action being taken by authorities to intervene in the market’s determination of what constitutes a productive business enterprise is serving the purported goal of extending the process so that an orderly liquidation can ensue. This is having the unintended consequence of making capital for productive businesses very expensive or, in some cases, non-existent. In some respects the cure is worse than the disease.”http://www.minyanville.com/articles/aig-fannie-freddie-fnm-fre-fed/index/a/19014

GLOOMYSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

THE SHEOPLE ARE STARTING TO GET IT”Part of us assumes that somehow everything will work out, because it always has.But then there’s that nagging realization — we can feel it in the pits of our stomachs — that we might, just might, have to relive a version of the Great Depression.Things are really that serious.”http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080917/COLUMNIST/809170340/2273/NEWS&template=printart

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:22 pm

I still have the same question from yesterday.What would happen to the $85B “loan” when/if AIG’s shares go to $1 or 50 cents?Roubini? Anyone?LET’S BURN SOME CDS

W.S.September 17th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

Productivity?!Come On, that’s only for the little people, you know the one’s who are too small to save, but not so small as to pay for the the choosen few who are too big to fail.

AnnSSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

Actually Bernanke and Paulson are NOT using “experimental solutions”. They have gone all the way back to 1929 -32 to do what they are doing. It was done then – maybe not by calling it “shares” but instead by floding cash into everything and anything inclusing insurers, utilities….The statute Bernanke used on AIG was passed in July 1932 – and that was Hoover’s time in office. It was passed as a means to funnel funds to large companies (not banks) to try to prop them up.In case you forgot, it didn’t work then either.And those holding companies were as complicated and intertwined as the credit derivatives, CDOs and SIVs today. One needs an 8′ x 8′ wall to figure out the relationships and obligations in such things as Van Sweringen holdings or the Ivar Kreuger’s interlocking businesses (Krueger & Toll et al) and a host of others.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601212&sid=a5NeeeEiuycQ&refer=homeSavings Bonds Face Ill Wind From Treasury“The government slashed the amount of money you’re allowed to invest in savings bonds. Formerly, you could put as much as $30,000 a year into paper Series I bonds and another $30,000 into the electronic version — $60,000 in all. In January, the Treasury dropped the maximum to $5,000 for each type of purchase.”This really bothers me. It’s almost as if the Treasury had deliberately taken away any and all ways for the American consumer to save responsibly and conservatively before the big bust this week. It’s like they saw it coming, and didn’t want to give recourse to anyone to gain even nominal growth.I keep hearing pablum from Bloomberg commentators about how the U.S. is still the most “stable” place to pack your investments . . . how could foreign investors really believe America is the place to park their money when not only the largest U.S. brokers, but even the government itself have done all they could to deliberately strip the average working person’s ability to safely save and invest? I would rather invest in Sweden or Switzerland or any of the European countries than this joke of a “financial haven.”

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:27 pm

i apologize for my basic question (i am new here and not an economist) will the aig bailout affect in any way the scenario that roubini has spelled out as most likely to happen? looking at the markets today it doesn’t seem like the investors think that it will delay the inevitable for more than a brief period of time if at all…

AnnSSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Wee problem. These “giants” (or anyother large company) haven’t exactly been generous with their employees. Wages and incomes have been flat or falling for years when adjusted for inflation. At this point the wage slaves have nothing more to left to pay taxes to help those unemployed or to rescue fools like the CEO of AIG and all the rest.Remeber Wall St Rule Number One: Cheer when a corporation cuts staff as it is lowering overhead and increasing profit.

bythewaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Also in Britain:From http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/61804/Don-t-let-the-spivs-destroy-BritainDON’T LET THE SPIVS DESTROY BRITAINexcerpt:But the Prime Minister Gordon Brown seemed more concerned with saving his own neck than tackling the economic emergency which was unfolding and his Chancellor Alistair Darling has been written off already as hopeless.Throughout the 20th century, free market capitalism proved itself to be the best economic system for delivering higher living standards. The Cold War was won for the West as much because of communismís palpable failure to secure prosperity as its hostility to freedom.While people behind the Iron Curtain suffered permanent impoverishment, free markets and a free society went hand-in-hand in the West and material gains were available to anyone prepared to work hard.But in the past few years that unbeatable economic recipe has gone awry. Most of the benefits of capitalism have been enjoyed by an ever-diminishing number of people in finance houses and corporate boardrooms.Currently, there are many examples of what was once termed ìthe unacceptable face of capitalismî. As well as the wrecking tactics of speculators, bankers and oil barons, ordinary families are having to put up with the antics of domestic power firms preparing to raise charges yet again so that consumers bear the cost of the Governmentís energy ìrescue packageî for the poor.The lives of hard-working people in Britain are increasingly blighted by a feckless underclass whose indolence they are forced to bankroll through the tax and benefits system and a ruthless overclass which siphons off billions.Unless action is taken to stop all these spivs in their tracks, decent people will lose faith in the dynamism of free enterprise and the moral imperative of striving for self-reliance.It is a horrible thought but the greed of a few bankers and corporate fat cats could hand an undeserved lifeline to the failed creed of State socialism. It must not be allowed to happen.Same game everywhere!

GLOOMYSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:28 pm

Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) — Former U.S. Treasury Secretary John Snow said credit markets are almost “frozen” and called the government takeover of American International Group Inc. a “huge” failure of risk management and regulation.Snow, chairman of private-equity firm Cerberus Capital Management LP, said today in a telephone interview that capital markets are on the verge of seizing up.“Our debt markets are close to frozen” he said. “Unless we get this fixed pretty soon, we’re in for a big, big, deep slowdown.”

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:30 pm

Dow on fire! up 150 points in seconds. Double bottom in place a nd a green close on the horizon? Never doubt the power of Hank…

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:34 pm

I can’t believe the US markets are not crashing with the headlines flying off Bloomberg! “Bank Lending Frozen”, “Credit Markets Cease Functioning” and the Dow is rallying off the lows?????

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

does anyone know if the Russians are beginning to dump their Fannie Mae bonds and US Treasuries, due to their liquidity squeeze this week?

DownSouthSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

AnnS,Don’t know if you’ve read Frederick Lewis Allen’s Since Yesterday: The 1930′s in America, but it’s certainly worth the read. It treats in detail of the things you speak, not only of their efficacy but of the moral and political implications as well.

W.S.September 17th, 2008 at 1:40 pm

If your savings can’t even keep pace with inflation, much less grow, then you have to work more and longer to make up for the losses.And if you work more and longer, you pay them more taxes, so they can enjoy more of your surplus and continue to make decisions thatbenefit themselves at your cost.Actually, it’s a pretty good deal.For them.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:42 pm

2:21 p.m.Morgan, Goldman on track for largest declines everWon’t matter now with the Dow headed back to green.

4822September 17th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

“up 150 points in seconds. “Sometimes the steam coming off the steaming pile is so thick it appears to be a rising solid mass.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:54 pm

More proof the idiots are running the asylum:Audit finds Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives lost 76 weapons and 418 laptops over five years

DownSouthSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:57 pm

I don’t know enough myself about the area of finance and economics to form a strong opinion one way or the other as to whether the bailout should have been extended. The people I respect, like Roubini, seem to be split.What I do know is that all these dire warnings about the economy come on the heels of other dire warnings, like those of “mushroom clouds.” And they come from the same source, from the same administration that seems to have no compunction whatsoever yelling “the sky is falling” if it fits its political objectives.So I have zero faith in this administration, in its judgment or in its honesty.And while I know that’s not the best basis for good decision making, it is nevertheless the only basis I have.So I’m throwing in my lot with Roubini.

JimmyThe BankerSeptember 17th, 2008 at 1:58 pm

Anyone else get the feeling that this is starting to unravel on a global scale? Just me? DIdn’t think so.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:02 pm

I was just rereading Charles McKay’s account(in Extraordinary delusions and madness of crowds”) of John Law’s Mississppi scheme in France. Things have hardly changed since 1720.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:02 pm

its global and its hard to know the extent – we are witneessing the deleveraging of 10-1, 30-1, and 100-1 derivatives on a massive domino-cascaded global scale…

DownSouthSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:10 pm

The fact that the Fed, as Roubini points out, is doing all this under such a veil of secrecy also does little to instill faith, trust or confidence.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:20 pm

The point is not where we are, but where we’re headed.The banking industry is sinking. What is the evidence? The evidence is that the world’s largest insurer and major underwriter of world debt had to be rescued by American taxpayers or it was going to ravish many of its clients, the world’s largest banks and corporations.According to Yahoo!News, “The problems at AIG stemmed from its insurance of mortgage-backed securities and other risky debt against default. If AIG couldn’t make good on its promise to pay back soured debt, investors feared the consequences would pose a greater threat to the U.S. financial system than this week’s collapse of the investment bank Lehman Brothers.“The worries were heightened Monday after Moody’s Investor Service, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings lowered AIG’s credit ratings, forcing AIG to seek more money for collateral against its insurance contracts. Without that money, AIG would have defaulted on its obligations and the buyers of its insurance — such as banks and other financial companies — would have found themselves without protection against losses on the debt they hold.”OK. What’s next? The investment banks that this insurance company was trying to cover are exposed. Already there’s renewed skepticism regarding JPs’ and Goldman’s financial situations, which is what Roubini has implied. The bigger you are, the more leverage used, the greater your percentage of earlier profits, the more financial entanglements around the world you have, then the harder you’re going to fall. The bigger the explosion.Once upon a time, the required reserves in American banks was a dollar for 10 leverage. Since 2000, while deposits and loans grew like a cancer to trillions of dollars, “Required Reserves” in the banks were the lowest in the history of banking, ie nothing less than zero! By October 2007 reserves had dropped to a microscopic 0.0026%, using figures from Doug Noland’s Credit Bubble Bulletin at PrudentBear.com. or about $15.4 trillion in bank assets and liabilities backed up by a minuscule $40.2 billion! That’s a quarter of 1%!Remember the warnings regarding derivatives ranging from Warren Buffet to Bill Gross? As Sir Julian Hodge, senior Welsh banker, put it: “…at some time in the future it (the derivatives trading market) could bring the world’s financial system to its knees.” At the height of the killings being made by banks in the derivatives market, JPMorgan Chase Bank was casino player Number One with $48,260.8 billion in derivatives and Citibank National Association and Bank of America NA NC vying for 2nd and 3rd. The three banks accounted for $89.9 trillion of the $248 trillion global derivatives market.Bear Stearns, Lehman and Merrill are nothing compared to the significance of the AIG time bomb. Because AIG is on the hook, we’re all on the hook. This is the signal that we’re headed for deeper and deeper waters, with our arms around the time bomb.

PhilTSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

I think what you/we are looking for/need is that which is not being said, explained, defined or clarified by those (very few) who are making these decisions –> just what the consequences would be, specifically, of not intervening in all/any of these failures. How can we honestly say that any of this is justified based on the supposition that is just might be worse otherwise.The one size fits all explanation that is constantly being repeated over every media outlet concerns systemic risk or risk of systemic collapse due to size or interconnectedness of the failing firm.Well, that is nowhere near sufficient yet it has become an apathetic mantra that everyone bends over and takes with pleasure.Call it what you will – crisis of leadership, incompetency, willful deceit/manipulation – but clearly it is reactionary, crisis management of the most flawed variety.If Prof/Dr. Roubini’s suggestions had ever made it to the table of the meeting room with those in charge of this mess, what do you imagine that scene to look like? On the other hand, how could these credentialed, pedigreed elite players overlook the common sense approaches that have been suggested for quite some time now?Be healthy, be well…

MarkSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:26 pm

I’d argue that the fact that Cubans are driving 50s Studebakers has more to do with their ability to afford new vehicles than it does with import restrictions. Out of 11 million Cubans, how many would you think could afford new cars?Are there trade restrictions with Korea? If not, then why would Cubans pay more for US cars?2/3rds of the world’s population lives on $3/day or less. The US would have to build really cheap cars! And all the while raw resource and energy (and insurance!) costs go up…Mark

tutterfrutSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

In Belgium, The Netherlands and France all finance ministers, prime ministers and financial regulators are claiming their banks and banking systems are sound and nobody should panic.Makes me feel rather nervous…

ptmSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:42 pm

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) was powered up last week and what happens? $1 trillion dollars disappeared into a black hole, that’s what happened. Now they are going to full test and we can kiss a few more trillion bucks goodbye. There is no money heaven, just black holes.Damn PeterJB you jinxed the economy with all this physics talk ;-) Ho Hum, physics indeed!http://www.physorg.com/news139810863.html

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:43 pm

“So soon enough the transformation the USA into the USSRA (United Socialist State Republic of America) will be complete: we have defeated the USSRR to create a communist economy in the most advanced free market economy in the world. And calling it socialism (even socialism for the rich, the well connected and Wall Street) is giving a bad name even to a failed experiment like socialism; this is more akin to the creation of a corporatist state (like the Italian fascism or the Germany Third Reich) where private sector interest are protected (gains privatized and losses socialized) where the government is taken over by corrupt and reckless private interests.”Perhaps recent events also indicate that capitalism as such is “a failed experiment” , albeit of greater length and intensity than socialism? Roubini’s comment seems somewhat unbalanced and unempirical.Darkie

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:51 pm

what is stopping these people from taking our savings and retirement funds and making the same kind of deals that have created this mess. Who’s is stopping them from taking this loans and doing it with them ?

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:56 pm

just a guess – I think the US may impose a mandatory requirement on all 401K holders that they must have 50% of the assets in US Treasury Bonds as a patriotic duty…

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:56 pm

Current lead article at ft.com:”The panic in world credit markets reached historic intensity on Wednesday prompting a flight to safety of the kind not seen since the second world war.Barometers of financial stress hit record peaks across the world. Yields on short-term US Treasuries hit their lowest level since the London Blitz.Andrew Brenner, co-head of structured products and emerging markets at MF Global, said: “It feels like no one wants to take anyone’s credit . . . it feels like we are on a precipice.”http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/8058d308-84d3-11dd-b148-0000779fd18c.html?nclick_check=1

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

The Great Depression was a breeding ground for the fascism in Germany and Italy.Now it could be the matrix for a US-fascism mutation.The gov of the last 8 years puts the corner stones.

DownSouthSeptember 17th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

Here’s a link to a very insigtful interview:http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/17/us_seizes_control_of_aig_withThe response of the Bush administration has been identical to that of the Hoover administration, and the outcome will, as the article linked asserts, likely be the same.

…no natural adjustment could be reached unless the burdens of debt could also be naturally reduced through bankruptcies. And in America, as in other parts of the world, the economic system had now become so complex and interdependent that the possible consequences of widespread bankruptcy to the banks, the insurance companies, the great holding-company systems, and the multitudes of people dependent upon them—had become too appalling to contemplate. The theoretically necessary adjustment became a practically unbearable adjustment. Therefore Hoover was driven to the point of intervening to protect the debt structure—first by easing temporarily the pressure of international debts without canceling them, and second by buttressing the banks and big corporations with Federal funds (via the Reconstruction Finance Corporation).Thus a theoretically flexible economic structure became rigid at a vital point. The debt burden remained almost undiminished. Bowing under the weight of debt—and other rigid costs—business thereupon slowed still further. As it slowed, it discharged workers or put them on reduced hours, thereby reducing purchasing power and intensifying the crisis.It is almost useless to ask whether Hoover was right or wrong. Probably the method he was driven by circumstances to adopt would have brought recovery very slowly, if at all, unless devaluation of the currency had given a fillip to the recovery—and devaluation to Hoover was unthinkable. It is also almost useless to ask whether Hoover was acting with a tory heartlessness in permitting financial executives to come to Washington for a corporate dole when men and women on the edge of starvation were denied a personal dole. What is certain is that at a time of such widespread suffering no democratic government could seem to be aiding the financiers and seem to be simultaneously disregarding the plight of its humbler citizens without losing the confidence of the public. For the days had passed when men who lost their jobs could take their working tools elsewhere and contrive an independent living, or cultivate a garden patch and thus keep body and soul together, or got West and begin again on the frontier. When they lost their jobs they were helpless. Desperately they turned for aid to the only agency responsible to them for righting the wrongs done them by a blindly operating economic society: they turned to the government. How could they endorse a government which gave them—for all they could see—not bread, but a stone?The capitalist system had become so altered that it could not function in its accustomed ways, and the consequences of its failure to function had become too cruel to be borne by free men. Events were marching, and Herbert Hoover was to be among their victims, along with the traditional economic theories of which he was the obstinate and tragic spokesman.–Frederick Lewis Allen, Since Yesterday: The 1930s in America

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:02 pm

IMPOTENTWe have finally arrived at that moment when Fed action no longer matters to the market. It took many months, but we have arrived.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:05 pm

Country first! Country first! USA USA!(I just heard McCain appeal to “patriotism” as the solution to fixing the mess.)

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:11 pm

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — The decision by a money market fund to cut the value of its shares could cost TD Ameritrade’s (AMTD:td ameritrade hldg corp comNews, chart, profile, moreLast: 17.78-1.66-8.54%3:59pm 09/17/2008Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolioAnalystCreate alertInsiderDiscussFinancialsSponsored by:AMTD 17.78, -1.66, -8.5%) customers up to $100 million, according to an analyst note Wednesday. The Reserve said Tuesday that the price of shares of its Primary Fund was dropping to 97 cents from $1, and that it was postponing cashing out investors for seven days. “While the net asset value at which client redemptions will occur will not be known until the fund prices at 5 p.m. today, client losses could potentially exceed $100 million depending on how much of the externally managed money market fund balance was held with Primary Fund,” said Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co. analyst Matt Snowling. A TD Ameritrade spokeswoman said the company doesn’t comment on analyst research.

BMHSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

Having followed the slowmotion (well recently not quite so slowmotion) financial meltdown over the last 12 month on various blogs, today for the first time I find an innuendo of “Internationale Finanzjudentum” on several blogs. On one side this is a clear sign of desperation. People are looking for a scapegoat and up they come with the usual suspect. Prof. Roubine might as well have included this phenomen into his 12 steps toward financial meltdown.On the other side I think from now on one might consider people ridng this detour on this forum as trolls. Don^t let us be distracted from our debate by them. Let us ignore them. But let us be on the alert. History rhymes.BMH

Internet CafeSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$INSIDER$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$This will require far more Patriotism than 9/11 did.A Financial war will erupt across the Globe.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

4:12 p.m. Conseco shares slump 40% on exposure to AIG, Lehman, WaMuConseco gonna have to file bankruptcy again?! Some people never learn!

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

I see the current scenario quite differently from most posters here. In my opinion, the last three days have been masterfully orchestrated by the Fed and the Treasury. Let’s review:a. Most IBs have big positions in asset-backed securities. The cash flows that underpin the value of those assets are based on the capacity of the middle class to make money and buy things. That capacity is being eroded by globalization and the lack of effective response by our society to that globalizationb. The government, and the “elite” understand this well. They realize that you can’t get people to work harder or lower their std of living willingly. That has to happen via coercionc. Everyone, and I do mean everyone, was in on the debt-bubble scam. Top to bottom. Europe, UK, China, everyone. And we all knew it wouldn’t last.d. Now we are at the end of the party. Assets are now being re-priced to accurate levels. The come-to-Jesus moment when the kimono fell away was Lehman’s BK.e. All the IBs are receptacles of the most egregiously mis-priced assets. These IBs, as the professor says, will fail. The only question is “in what manner do they fail?”.f. If they all fail at once, the market will seize, and panic will ensue. If the herd spooks, a lot of innocent people get destroyed.g. The Fed and Treasury’s responsibility at this time is to insure gradual and not sudden deflation, because it’s easier to rebuild an economy that’s been spanked .vs. one that’s been flattened. Gradualism.h. How can gradualism be accomplished?a. sequence the failures. Beat down the IBs until they’re ready to accept their fate, and then pair them off (match weaknesses to strengths) or run them into the chop-shop for dismemberment and piece-meal auction.b. identify a repository that is big enough to hold all the failing companies, and can hold them long enough to cancel out the cross-obligations (the counterparty relationships), and has the financial standing to handle the radiation until the markets return to normalcy. There is only one such repository on the planet, and that’s the US Govt., and more specifically a mechanism like the RTC. This is already a discussion item from the icon of the ’80s, Paul Volcker himself.The Fed and Treasury have done an excellent job so far of managing and sequencing the failures. It is obvious now to each IB what’s going to happen, and who is next in line for the chop-shop. The SEC’s rule to limit shorting is intended to keep the market from accelerating the rate of failures past the capacity of the gov’t to process the bodies. The “printing of money” is not (currently) creating money faster than it’s being destroyed; this is a non-issue at this time.The “expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet” is perfectly appropriate. The U.S. Treasury is funding the Fed chop-shop so it can take in the next body and keep it long enough to dismember it, and sell the parts to recover the money the U.S. gov’t puts up. The AIG chop-shop txn will probably end up being profitable to the U.S. taxpayer. Yes, I did say “profitable”.So let’s keep the freak-out, sky-is-falling talk to a minimum until it’s time for it. Remember, this is *your* economy that is at stake here.The fact that the short-term t-bill rate is going negative is perfectly normal; everyone wants to be in t-bills right now, because there’s lots of fear.Our main worry right now is that the Fed/Treasury gets overwhelmed by the pace of the failures, or that there’s a bank run. Dr. Roubini’s suggestion that the US Gov’t expand the FDIC funding is very appropos. We need to keep breathing deeply and calmly, and recognize that the most significant variable of all at this time is the composure and comprehension of the U.S. public.The stock market will go down more, maybe a lot more. This is going to be painful. But all of us were involved in the bubble-up, we’ll all be involved in the bubble-down.Once the fear subsides, and we are able to think more clearly, I encourage those of you that are capable of clear and deliberate thought to consider what we’re going to do as a society to build a stable and reliable economy that is *not* a bubble, but is instead based on a fundamental, reliable, and lasting competitive advantage.The normal stuff you’d build a business around.Dr. Roubini has told you in great clarity about what the path down to assets=reality looks like. What he’s not done, and maybe can’t do, is to describe what the path to rebuilding our standard of living is going to look like. That will be our job, and now is a good time to start working on it. Channel that fear into something useful.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:19 pm

from Wiki:Conseco was the trigger for the creation of the current structure of the credit default swap market. The restructuring settlement option was shown in 2000 to have major flaws when the bank debt of Conseco Finance was restructured, triggering CDS settlements even though the restructuring was not detrimental to investors. This led to the creation of a more restrictive restructuring definition.They get what they deserve.

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:22 pm

@ Mark,You don’t make the deal with the citizens of Cuba… You make it with their government. That’s who buys their country’s cars.In exchange, you eliminate having an enemy 90 miles off our coastline.In addition, you take an island that is in the oil rich gulf, and trade for natural resources. They have an abundance of Sun, Wind, and cheap Gov’t labor. Let’s not forget that this “little” island isn’t too much smaller then Florida. (it’s over 100,000 sq miles)Don’t think “current value”. Think of what it “could be” worth! The MOB thought it was a gold mine. …it may just be still?This isn’t a “solution”. It’s a baby step.Miss America

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

Thank you for posting this. It’s an extremely intelligent comment.I work at a small investment firm and this is what I’ve been trying to tell people all day. Yeah, the guys at the Fed are stuid… just like the rest of us. Nobody knows how to “fix this”… all we can do is band together and try. In the end, we are all to some degree culpable for it and we all need to climb out and build a new world when it’s over with.

Christain MarxSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:41 pm

Nonsense. No need to patronize anyone about their perceived inability to think clearly, unless we may assume that your own thought is clouded by tenebrous vapors. Indeed, let’s do that. I encourage you, if you are capable of clear and deliberate thought–highly unlikely, as no-one capable of clear and deliberate thought rushes to this drearily manipulative and fatuously unoriginal judgment about others–to wait until your fear subsides. A minimum waiting time is at least a decade.The largess of the government should be extended to the taxpayer, who needs relief from crushing debt. That largess cannot extend only to the rich and well connected. And there will be no relief until the personal debts of the taxpayer are forgiven.

P1AQLSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:50 pm

Jay Dhru of S&P was on Bubblevision saying he wasn’t the analyst that put the AAA lipstick on the CDO pig. That AAA lipstick was toxic, started the whole mess and allowed Wall Street to sell the poisonous sausage crap. The rating agencies are the root cause of the problem and have a lot to answer for.Bubblevision asked with newly found character: If you put the lipstick on the pig previously, how can we be sure you’re right in removing lipstick from the AIG pig?Good questions!P1AQL.P.S. Gloomy, you might just get your wish. There was this post on Mish’s site once that talked about a poor disconsolate guy who lived in a hut near a gold mine and kept telling the prospectors there wasn’t any gold. The townspeople were busy selling picks and axes and chided the old man who depended on the townsfolk for food . Finally, it turned out to be true that the mine indeed had fool’s gold. The townsfolk lost their livelihood and the old man died of hunger. To that Mish replied, we’re damned either way. There, you have it.Enjoy the abyss.P1AQL.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:54 pm

I’d say the best thing to do for the economy is GUT the RETHUGLIKAN party the way Palin guts a moose – And start with the SOB Phil Graham, who slipped into legislation in the middle of the night back in’99 the seed that has lead to this f’n disaster – then outlaw the Rethuglikan party

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 3:55 pm

OuterBeltway,I wouldn’t bet that the Treasury is in the position to orchestrated anything but the last minute save attempts that we are seeing.Things appear now way too complex to think that even TPTB may know the effect of their machinations. Too many unintended consequences in an unstable system.Moreover, I can’t think of Paulson to orchestrate the collapse of Goldman Sachs.It is possible that they have more control than it appears, but the accelerating pace of failures points out that the system is probably spiraling out of control.Best luck to all.

Oneeyed FionaSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:56 pm

A great post and it helps balance some of the over-eager — dare I say it? — ‘schadenfreude’ from those who revel just a bit too much in “we got what we deserve”. Personally, I think Roubini’s chapters in the WEF Financial Development Report 2008 is a great example of clear thinking for the road ahead (I wonder if Dr. Roubini, if he reads these posts, is really thinking: “Lord, save me from my followers!”(just kidding –Cheers,One-eyed Fiona#;>)

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 3:57 pm

The TED spread –the difference between the three-month Treasury bill and the three-month Libor — spiked to 3.02%, marking its highest level on record. The higher spread indicates increased fears of credit risk and reluctance of banks to lend to each other. In a flight to safety, investors flocked to the three-month Treasury bill, sending its yield to only 0.04%, down sharply from last Friday’s yield of 1.47%.

MarcoSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

“today for the first time I find an innuendo of “Internationale Finanzjudentum” on several blogs.”First time ? “Internationale Finanzjudentum” ? Tell it to Mearsheimer and Walt.Who spoke about Finanzjudentum, sir ?I spoke about a political (not financial) cabal (neocons) who contributed to destroy US economy (did you ever heard of the three-trillion-dollar-war sir ?). And this cabal – it’s a matter of fact, sir – is for a great part made of persons of jewish origin. Sir, if you don’t like reality you should better read/watch/listen MSM.”Let us ignore them. But let us be on the alert. History rhymes.”You can guess that history rhymes, first time like tragedy, the second like a farce. Great depression was a REAL tragedy, what will like be this one?However my best compliments for your openmindedness.

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:02 pm

Yeah, I don’t know if it is possible to find a safe place to hide from all of this, but I sure am going to try!

L. Morgan Stanislaw, 3rdSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:12 pm

Wrong! This is a terrible, condescending post. As Christian Marx has pointed out, Roubini has explained, briefly, that the consumer needs debt relief. This could be done equitably. It’s wrong for OuterBeltway to pretend that Roubini hasn’t considered the way out, and to suggest that he has a monopoly on clear thinking.Most taxpayers I know aren’t quants inventing impossible to value securities, they don’t sit on house and senate banking committees, and they don’t lobby the government for special privileges. [The term "quant" itself is a disparaging term used by MBAs to minimize PhDs, incidentally.]As I mentioned earlier: the conservative position that there aren’t enough rich people to tax for sufficient tax revenue has a flip side: there aren’t enough of them to bail out for there to be sufficient credit. If the wealthy get bailed out, and the middle class is still left in a credit crunch, then there still will not be enough credit for the system to function. The same arguments about the necessity to bail out the wealthy, on pain of the collapse of the financial system, apply with greater force to the lower socioeconomic classes regarding credit.

DarkieSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:15 pm

This Princeton professor of history and international affairs implies that US actions most closely resemble the early stages of continental European fascism, or at least a moment when crony capitalism can morph into fascism:…History provides little comfortThe drama of the past days – the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the rapid purchase of Merrill Lynch, the weakness of AIG, the threats to other institutions – all have no real historical precedent.It is impossible to find parallels for the extent of this week’s banking crisis since the Great Depression. But the implosions of the weekend do not even look like the American experience of depression, in which the country was swept by wave after wave of panic that wreaked widespread havoc by hitting small institutions exposed to local market conditions. Today’s crisis, by contrast, is right at the heart of the financial system, and threatens a complex pattern of credit guarantees and insurance backstops that were touted as making the financial system failsafe.Bankers, like everyone else, like to suck on a comfort blanket. In the middle of any episode of banking weakness or financial turmoil their oft-repeated claim is that they have learnt the right lessons from the Great Depression. It became an article of faith that a catastrophe of that magnitude could not occur again.In particular, in the 1930s, monetary policymaking was paralysed. Out of that story came a simple lesson that all policymakers have absorbed from Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz’s monumental Monetary History of the United States, and from its central chapter on the Great Contraction. The policy recommendation is simple: central banks have a responsibility to not allow a bank collapse to be followed by a deflationary monetary contraction.The US Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England are currently doing much more than working out this lesson. They are providing massive amounts of liquidity and lending against an increasingly wide range of assets (now including equities). The central banks believe that they need to stop a chain reaction of financial sector collapses leading to a position when banks will no longer lend to anyone.This lesson on liquidity is not the same as that drawn by Friedman and Schwartz. It is more activist and much older. It stems from the British experience of 19th century banking crises and it reached its most powerful exposition in Walter Bagehot’s Lombard Street.Bagehot was the previous version of the bankers’ comfort blanket. The doctrine of liquidity provision depends on a clear separation of liquidity and solvency. Bagehot was completely lucid on this point: that the central bank’s responsibility lay in injecting temporary liquidity to deal with the problems of momentarily illiquid but not insolvent institutions. But if his doctrine was so effective as a remedy for crisis, why did the panics and collapses of the Great Depression occur?The problem is that the Great Depression was quite different from Bagehot’s panics, as are our current problems. In the middle of a panic that does not arise suddenly, but follows from a valuation problem (such as the subprime crisis), when markets are no longer effectively communicating price signals, it is impossible to know what solvency means. Indeed, one peculiarity of Lehman’s bankruptcy filing is the statement of assets and liabilities, in which assets are still listed as being greater than the liabilities.If there are Great Depression parallels to today’s saga, they are with continental Europe, where big and complex institutions at the centre of the financial network blew up: the Creditanstalt in Austria or the Darmstädter Bank in Germany or the whole Italian banking system. As with today’s crisis, the failure of each large institution set off a search for who might be the next target. The possible solutions then were exactly those on offer today. The large institutions might rescue themselves by a credit support system. The central banks at that time hoped there was just a liquidity problem. In the weekend of crisis talks that preceded the failure of the Darmstädter Bank on July 13 1931, the German government pressed the largest and soundest bank, Deutsche Bank, to support its ailing competitor. Its managers answered that they could not judge the scale of the exposure and could, therefore, not take a risk that might bring down their own institution.Alternatively, the government or the central bank might give credit against the assets of the banks, pretending that, again, there was just a liquidity issue but running the risk that they would end up taking over those assets if the problem was one of solvency. The Italian government ended up in this position and needed to consolidate the banks’ assets into a state holding company, IRI, that for six decades ran most of the Italian economy.The policy paralysis of the Depression came from the exceptional circumstances of a big and sustained panic. As prices no longer give good signals, no one could really apply the Bagehot doctrine. The comfort blanket was useless and the policymakers simply experimented and hoped for the best. If you swill enough liquidity around in your mouth, you might get rid of the bad taste of insolvency.Policy in the Great Depression was improvised and, in retrospect, inadequate. That was why an alternative comfort blanket was so attractive, even though it did not and does not deal with the issues raised by financial distress.Today there are real risks, on the one hand of inadequate action and on the other of actions that have damaging long-term side effects. Weighing those risks is a judgment call on which history does not provide any firm lessons.The weakness of AIG, the threats to other institutions – all have no real historical precedent.Harold JamesThe writer is professor of history and international affairs at the Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University and Marie Curie professor of history at the European University Institute.http://ft.onet.pl/0,14757,history_provides_little_comfort,artykul_ft.html

PeterJBSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:20 pm

At this point in time, with hands that tremble: Why?It is my considered opinion that it is NOT the global economic, financial and monetary system that faces a systemic global collapse, but the Engine of that system – that has been intentionally systemically destroyed.In other words, that Constitutional Republic known as the United States of America, which grew nurtured by its most unique Constitution and Bill of Rights, that granted unqualified freedom to all humanity regardless of race creed or colour, has been progressively brought to a state of utter dysfunction and today, we witness the final stages of its demise.It is most ironic, that this great state which intentionally from its breaking out of its egg, was granted the unique opportunity to dismiss the imposition of the fractional reserve banking system that fettered the rest of the World, where this great evil of Central Banking, was removed from the course of American history by its Constitution; and indeed, the magnificence in the absence of this collar of servitude, allowed the United States of America to soar like the Eagle that was adopted as its symbol of greatness.This fractional reserve banking system having its origins in the ancient levant was banned at its earliest appearance but continued to make appearances in early Greece and later Greece, Southern Europe, Venician influences, through Napoleon era as Anglo-dutch logics, through the colonial states throughout the globe, with the singular exception, of the USA. Slowly and imperceptably, this system of manipulative stealth and deception by that political and the bureaucratic, finally arrived into the USA by the intense and focused influence of the global Banker Community at large, that community, which holds its keys.It is ironic then, that this ‘exception’ to the birth of the United States of America, the fractional reserve banking system, together with its Central Bankers, have finally succeeded in bringing this great Constitutional Republic to its death-moment knees; with full applause and eager anticipation for the incarceration and mediocrity, that will soon, be allowed, to be imposed, and played, like incest. Gone, will be the spirit, in death, we celebrate.Of course, the global economic, monetary and financial system will live on as it is the expressed innate energies of the peoples at large, but they shall be tempered and guided by the bureaucratic and political, those meek hands of fear, and cowardice; trembling under the stern, brutish and heavy hands of those that control the back-door; Central Banking system and its priests of ignorance and incompetence.In other words, the final essence of greatness is to be extruded in totality, from all men, and freedom lost (for now).Ho hum

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:23 pm

Alessandro:You’re right – the pace and sequence of the failures is not in anyone’s control, but the Fed and the Treasury are doing very well at the net these past few days – they are influencing well.

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:23 pm

Can somebody explain what kind of assets Morgan Stanley holds? How vulnerable are they? Is Morgan going to go bankrupt like Lehman? If so, why?

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:27 pm

as of a few months ago, the figures are that Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have more Level 3 assets than equity much worse than Lehman…Level 3 Assets Divided by Equity (as of a few months ago):Morgan Stanley 251%Goldman Sachs 185%Lehman Brothers 159%Bear Stearns 154%Citigroup 105%Merrill Lynch 38%

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

Great post as usual. However (err), I have one thing to say:Do you really think that the Fed (or for that matter) really know what they are doing or what the consequences of their actions would be beyond 3 months .. err .. 1 month … err … 1 day … few hours?Remember the discussion we had and analogies we made between the economy and a system reaching its borderlines? I guess now we are at the borderline (or past it) where all stable cause/reaction relationships (as was known when the system was “small”) are potentially considerably changing in magnitude and direction. What is worse, is that Fed/Treasury actions (interventions) could be thought as Exogenous variables that markets are not used and able to discount/take into consideration appropriately.We may also argue that fixing a shaky system may not be a very good idea. I am with you (as MA argued) that not all parts of the finance industry are to blame (real finance) – otherwise I will have to change my career while I can. Thinking about a solution and how to rebuild a sounder system is a good thing to do now. However, I am not sure implementing these solutions is timely before the dust settles down. Remember that the most basic regulations are the ones taken after GD.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:28 pm

One of the keys to great discussion is to filter out the emotional, and respond to the facts.Remember, I’m not posting to insult or degrade. Not the intention; the purpose of the post is to stimulate debate about “what’s next”, and to point out that the Gov’ts course is both rational and fairly effective (slow ramp down so far).Now, nowhere in my text do I address the topic of how to divvy up the diminishing pie. I advocate a mechanism to gradualize the conversation so that it can be done without wrecking the building the conversation is held within. The politics of that get addressed during the congressional hearings about the form and function of the next RTC.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

LOLFrom the NY Times: Washington Mutual Begins Efforts to Sell ItselfGoldman Sachs, which Washington Mutual has hired, started the auction several days ago, these people said. Among the potential bidders that Goldman has talked to are Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and HSBC.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:31 pm

Allianz, Flowers Said to Have Bid for AIG Before Fed TakeoverBy Zachary R. Mider and Erik HolmMore Photos/DetailsSept. 17 (Bloomberg) — Allianz SE, Europe’s largest insurer, made an offer to invest in American International Group Inc. that was rejected by the U.S. insurer two days before it accepted a government takeover, said two people with knowledge of the bid.Allianz teamed with J.C. Flowers & Co., the New York-based private equity firm run by J. Christopher Flowers, in an effort to help New York-based AIG stave off a cash crunch, according to the people who declined to be identified because the talks were private.Sabia Schwarzer, a spokeswoman for Munich-based Allianz, declined to comment. Flowers and Nicholas Ashooh, an AIG spokesman, didn’t return calls seeking comment.AIG, the biggest U.S. insurer by assets, accepted an $85 billion loan from the government yesterday in exchange for a 79.9 percent stake. Edward Liddy, the former Allstate chief executive officer, will replace Robert Willumstad as AIG’s CEO, said another person who is familiar with that situation. All three of the people spoke on condition of anonymity.The U.S. Federal Reserve said it offered the loan because of the risk that an AIG failure would threaten the stability of world financial markets.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

Anonymous:It is with great difficulty and restraint that I avoid speaking ill of the current administration. The only thing that helps in that regard is my recognition that the Dems rarely did anything much better, and that the forces that influence the Repubs also control the Dems. I’m hoping for better, but I’m really not expecting much.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:36 pm

I think my post demonstrates clear and rational thinking. I invite you to refute either the facts I lay out, or the logic I use to interpret them.Let me also say that I am in perfect sympathy with those of you that express rage at the current situation. My prior posts, in this and in many other venues attest to this. The challenge is to channel the rage into action, and not just blog entries.

randySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:39 pm

Peter:Well said! and I agree. I’m reading about most of what you described in the book “the Creature from Jekyll Island”.The current incarnation of our central bank (federal Reserve) is the fourth “try” at central banking in the US. The first three were killed. WE NEED TO KILL THIS ONE!

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:46 pm

AfA:Good to hear from you. I agree with everything you said – a good bit of the next part of the process is luck. I got some good advice some years back. It goes like this: “When you’re facing multiple uncertainties, stack the deck as much as you can in your own favor. Get every part of your toolset sharp, oiled, and rehearsed”.We all criticized FEMA and the Corps of Engineers for being totally unprepared for Katrina. We need to get prepared not only for the storm, but more importantly, for the aftermath. That requires debate, and I’m hoping someone (maybe you) will kick off that debate about what “preparation” looks like.

WaterSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:49 pm

“The Fed and Treasury have done an excellent job so far of managing and sequencing the failures.”1) Basically they are just throwing money at the failures.2) Are they sequencing the failures, or are they just reacting to them as they occur. Is the FED / government controlling the failures, or are the failures controlling the Fed / government.3) The Fed / government are largely responsible for this crisis and had plenty of time and opportunity to mitigate itvia regulation. Now they are usurping power as they try to do damage control. If they couldn’t fix it when it was in the beginning stages, who has confidence they can now during the critical stages?

L. Morgan Stanislaw, 3rdSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:54 pm

The characterization of the Fed’s actions as masterful gradualism does not bear scrutiny, to put it mildy. On Monday the Fed is lauded for “drawing a line in the sand” and the next day they bail out AIG, “masterfully orchestrating” the “orderly ” euthanasia of financial institutions approvingly offering their necks on the chopping block.I’ll be on the A train to Chambers Street in a few minutes to offer passers by a few bucks for the suits off their backs. Care to join me?

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:56 pm

Excuse Me, But… (from Hellasious)The stiff upper lip evident in the willingness to let Lehman fail lasted exactly 24 hours. Yesterday the Bush administration panicked (yet again) and agreed to “rescue” AIG by providing it with a $85 billion Fed loan. As a result, the US taxpayer is now the majority owner of the insurance company – further adding to his/her portfolio of problematic (to put it very mildly) FIRE industry assets.I won’t go into the legality or other bureaucratic issues surrounding such bailouts/nationalizations (yet another falling knife caught at enormous cost…), but I do have a very simple question:Excuse me, but who’s going to ultimately salvage the salvager?http://suddendebt.blogspot.com/

mammonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:56 pm

Wayne Angell(ex-fed governor) came on Fast Money today and said “the fed’s balance sheet is infinite”. He suggested that the Fed could play the role of the Resolution Trust Corporationin prior times. They were discussing the 12% rate of interest(8+Libor) return on the Loan toAig. Do they not realize there is a taxpayer at risk. Angell says the taxpayer is going to make out and the Fed is doing a good job. Is the Fed the Treasury? Why do we need a Secretary of the Treasury? I can’t believe he actually said this on TV! It is time for the Fed to be relegated to Monetary Policy and Treasury should handle Regulation! INFINITE!! This tells mea lot about their mindset! They are playing WITH OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY! THINGS DO SEEM INFINITEWHEN THEY ARE NOT YOUR MONEY AT RISK!

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 4:58 pm

One-Eyed Fiona:What a lovely name. I haven’t read Dr. Roubini’s WEF 2008 report. I have read nearly all of his posts at this forum over the past year. My beef with the “financial sector fix” has two components:a. It’s about incremental fixes (more or less regulation, or transparency, etc.) instead of asking why the financial sector steered so much of our society’s resources into a black hole. Fin sector let down the entire economy – failed in its resource allocation functionb. The fixes don’t ask “Why was there no other more productive segment of our economy to channel resources into?”. Do you remember Warren Buffett saying “I’ve got all this cash, and I can’t find anything I want to invest in”. This is from Mr. Everyone Brings Their Deal to Me Buffett!Dr. Roubini doesn’t address either of those two basic issues, at least in what I’ve read. Remember, that is *not* a criticism of Dr. Roubini. He’s one person, who’s doing more than anyone else we know of to get the word out. I want to be one of the “followers” that tries to respond to Dr. Roubini’s lead with some creative thinking.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 17th, 2008 at 5:03 pm

Sorry, I still disagree. The FED and the Treasury have done anything and then some to protect the reckless ones at the expense of the prudent ones. The excuse is that they need to save the system, for the grater good of the people. Which is obvious BS. The status quo stinks and they are trying desperately to keep it as it is.The collapse of the world financial system in August 2008 would have been horrible, but this time around we would be reconstructing already. Instead we are still waiting the inevitable collapse, that will destroy one more year of accumulated wealth (think pension fund collected this year) and we have lost one full year of work for rebuilding the system.Then I fully agree with you on channeling ones rage on productive stuff. I’m not doing great now, but I try to keep focused.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:12 pm

Good reposte. Here’s my go at it:1. LEH didn’t get any money. AIG is a secured loan, and much of the collateral is very, very good.2. Both. The gov’t can influence, but it can’t control. This is a multi-player event, with external uncertainties added in.3. Agree. But remember, I didn’t praise Congress, and I didn’t praise the public, which is Congress’ putative boss. I praised the Fed, and I praised the Treasury’s last-one-week play.They are not usurping power. The Fed’s charter gives them the right to make any investment they please in the interests of banking system stability. The Treasury has the authority to invest in the Fed. So far, they are executing within the law.So far as confidence is concerned, I have much more confidence in them today than I did a week or a month ago. If they continue to exercise the good judgment we’ve seen over the past week, I will be delighted. This is an extraordinarily difficult situation, and if I may, I’ll note that Alan Greenspan is not present, in any significant way, to address or advise. Furthermore, you’ll note that the PTB selected someone as Fed chairman that has significant academic background on the topic of managing Depression-era phenomena. This is not an accident.In something as sloppy and chaotic as a “government” and a “society”, there’s going to be a lot of warfare and vying for control, even within one administration. We are seeing a lifetime event – the passing of an era, and the people responsible for that transition are only human. I see them as humans in a very fluid, difficult situation.I say “good on them” so far.Your serve.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:22 pm

I agree that sooner would have been much better. But the political process of swallowing the pill seems to always take forever; think of what it’s taking to get off fossil fuels, for example. There’s some kind of intellectual/emotional speed governor built into the human DNA ;) I’m thinking that the time for claw-backs and public canings may come soon, Alessandro. May be a huge campaign issue, and if Obama’s smart (and he is), it will be.

PeterJBSeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:27 pm

Speaking of MISH:Heading: Senate Majority Leader Reid: “No One Knows What to Do”Doesn’t this make you think that this is a “leadership” crisis?It’s time to “throw the bums out… ” elect leadership from the competent and those with some integrity, at least, and start again. And, get the fundamentals rights, as it was in the beginning (of the USA).Throw the FedRes out and turn the building into a bordello – it is anyway but this time legalize it and staff it with free-market entrepreneurs.The go to work on Congress, the Senate and the White House.Ho hum

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

A great piece, PeterJB.America was a dream that, unfortunately, the leaders who succeeded her founders failed to keep because they lacked the courage to stand up to special interests. Thus, the hope of holding onto a republic was dashed, and her succeeding civil liberties and freedoms went by the way as well. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn eloquently identifies the problem:”A decline in courage may be the most striking features which an outside observer notices in the West in our days. The Western world has lost its civic courage, both as a whole and separately, in each country, in each government, in each political party… Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression that the loss of courage extends to the entire society.”Jefferson, Franklin, Madison and Washington, Revere, Paine, Adams and Henry, could have stood up against the international bankers and the money manipulation that has made a virtual shell of our former society: America must replace her effete “leaders” with courageous and honorable men, or go the way of “Paradise Lost.”

noviceSeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:38 pm

I think HoHum Peter is on to the root cause, in essence- greed. Through usury- which is a subtle insidious form of slavery. The world is moved ever closer to the “New World” “New Age of enlightenment” Call me crazy if you like, but this is more than a monetary issue- it is a spiritual one. A battle being fought not only for the soul of a nation, but for the soul of each individual on the planet.The new world order for the new age of man, has a real agenda, with real players,very powerful ones who are working together to create what they believe is a Utopian society. In order to bring it about, the destruction of the current system needs to occur. To bring mankind to the point where they not only are ready to condemn it, but are also willing and ready to embrace a new system. One of so-called sharing, and tolerance. The world bank will be blamed for this crisis, and a new system will be born, and I will wager that the same world bankers will somehow be covertly involved. Do the research- you will be amazed at how far the rabbit hole goes. This systematic destruction has been going on since before WW1, in anticipation of a one world government and it’s leader. Yeah I know- you think I’m out on a limb, been reading to many conspiracy theories- maybe so. But I have followed the white rabbit for several years now, and I am more and more convinced that there is truth in it.The following quotes are from Share International archives July 1993″The Global Marshall Plan aims at a “World in Balance”. To achieve this we need a better design of globalization and the global economic processes – a worldwide Eco-Social Market Economy. This is a matter of an improved global structural framework, sustainable development, the eradication of poverty, environmental protection and equity, altogether resulting in a new global ‘economic miracle.’”"The communist system did not fail. It was never tried. We never saw communism in the so-called communist bloc. What we saw was a kind of state capitalism. What we are seeing now is a break-up of the totalitarian political system — which is not the same thing as communism — and the gradual transformation of capitalism. Maitreya says the symbol for the new economic situation, which will be neither capitalism nor communism, can be witnessed in the coming together of communist East Germany and capitalist West Germany. The reunification of Germany gives us the possibility for the creation of what he calls a social democracy or a democratic socialism — something which is neither classical capitalism nor communism. He says eventually this will be the norm in Europe and throughout the world.”"What we are going to witness is the creation, by Maitreya, of a world public opinion focused, galvanized, centred on sharing as a divine right. Maitreya says: “When you share, you recognize God in your brother.” He says the problems of mankind are real, but solvable. The solution lies within our grasp. He says: “Take your brother’s need as the measure for your action and solve the problems of the world. There is no other course.” He will galvanize and potentize world public opinion which, when so organized, no government on earth can withstand. It is that world public opinion which eventually will force all the governments in the world to accept the principle of sharing because it will be seen that we have no alternative. We either share or we die. It is as simple as that.”"We are also seeing the collapse of economic totalitarianism. The economic system, largely based on market forces, is approaching its death. There is a third totalitarianism yet to break up: religious totalitarianism. Religious totalitarianism is reaching the acme of its power. We see that in the rise of fundamentalist groups in all religions, even in the tolerant Buddhist and Hindu faiths. It is expressed in Islam very powerfully today and in Christianity too. It will be the last to disappear, but eventually totalitarianism in the churches will go. Then humanity will know freedom for the first time: political freedom, economic freedom and justice, and freedom of thought and belief.”The author Benjamin Creme- who may seem like an absolute crazy loon to most- claims to channel Maitreya- who he says is the next manifestation of the christ, who will appear after an economic crisis.Say what you will, but be aware of all the potential fallout from what is going on here- not just to your assets and bank accounts- but to your very soul- choose you this day whom you will serve.

MedicSeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:40 pm

@ hlowe:I do (believe it or not) hold my tongue. I do bite it often (there’s a good sized hole near the tip) and then go home and try and let things go. A good bottle of wine usually helps:-)This space is almost too easy – because it is anonymous – to react to my frustration. I have little tolerance for a few things, but mostly I have no tolerance for the right wing, religious and pious folks who do not see beyond what the church, government or Fox News tells them. Quite frankly, if Rush Limbaugh ever shows up in my ER, he’d better pray it’s my day off.

WaterSeptember 17th, 2008 at 5:56 pm

What are the options at this point?1) Let the current financial system implode, andrebuild from scratch?2) Try to wind it down as orderly as possible andmaintain the system fundamentally the same, whichmay end up imploding anyways but cost 1) plus 2)3) OtherWhat are the costs associated with each?1) unknown2) ~1 trillion and counting3) unknownWhat are the probabilities of success?1) unknown2) unknown3) unknownWhat can we do?1)2)3)What entities were involved in creating this mess?Who profited from the mess?Who will have to pay for the mess?

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:06 pm

it seems that the terms of the Fed loan is yet unclear. While Professor Nourini’s analysis is insightful, it is based on assumptions. Perhaps the Fed’s loan has provisions against short term creditors bailing out their financing… Its the Fed that is lending (and also managing) so why wouldnt the Fed state whatever loan conditions/terms they want, including a provision against AIG creditors leaving “scot free”?

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:15 pm

It is a marvelous system, first I borrow 100 dollars to my friend Josef, then I pay 5 dollars to get a CDO insurance in case Josef defaults. Josef being a good pal gives me back 50 dollars as comission fee, then defaults. Josef can keep his 50 dollars as I get my 100 dollar back from the insurance company.We both win!!!I started of with 100 and I now have 145 dollars while Josef started of with 0 and now have 45 dollars. It so easy I should really become an investment banker.

GloomySeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:19 pm

Ken Rogoff, chief economist of the IMF gets it:”One of the most extraordinary features of the past month is the extent to which the dollar has remained immune to a once-in-a-lifetime financial crisis. If the US were an emerging market country, its exchange rate would be plummeting and interest rates on government debt would be soaring. Instead, the dollar has actually strengthened modestly, while interest rates on three- month US Treasury Bills have now reached 54-year lows. It is almost as if the more the US messes up, the more the world loves it.But can this extraordinary vote of confidence in the dollar last? Perhaps, but as investors step back and look at the deep wounds of America’s flagship financial sector, the public and private sector’s massive borrowing needs, and the looming uncertainty of the November presidential elections, it is hard to believe that the dollar will continue to stand its ground as the crisis continues to deepen and unfold.”http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dd9aa390-84d6-11dd-b148-0000779fd18c.html

GLOOMYSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:33 pm

YES, THE SHEOPLE ARE DEFINITELY GETTING THE MESSAGEIn the United States, the faltering economy and banking system have begun to dominate conversations at dinner tables, bars and online, not to mention seizing the campaign trail.One blogger, Michele Catalano of Long Island, posted this on Wednesday: “Dreamed about AIG and the stock market, woke up with the urge to stock up on canned goods and shotguns.”http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080917/ap_on_bi_ge/financial_meltdown_94

MandarinSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:45 pm

The Fed and the Treasury have avoided the worst mistakes of 1929-32, certainly. But the problems being worked out now won’t be resolved by financial legerdemain or an intelligently run bankruptcy reorganization. They are endemic to a highly developed system of private property rights, production, and finance. The volume financial instruments has exceeded the real value productive assets. That’s a structural problem. The Fed, Treasury, and the other players merely abetted it.The result is going to be a drastic reduction in living standards that will probably last for a generation, and there won’t be any automatic reconstruction or recovery. The machine is broken, and it’s reconstitution or consolidation isn’t going to get it going again.The creation of wealth, payment for work, allocation of the tax burden, and disposition of the productive surplus will need to be rethought. The power relationships and legal underpinnings undone and rewritten. That’s what we call a political crisis. A systemic crisis. We’ve finally hit the wall, the pipedream is over. What’s coming up is bitter, contentious political fighting and class conflict.And that’s only in this one country. Internationally the same process will be played out as the up and comers take their place in line–ahead of us.

JPSeptember 17th, 2008 at 6:46 pm

These numbers are meaningless without context. If it were 418 out of 500, I’d be concerned. If it were 418 out of 12,000 and their IT department fixes them in house by swaping components and the technitions don’t understand the importance of tracking inventory, then maybe that’s not so bad.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:08 pm

Mandarin, that was really excellent. I see us at the stage every really successful society gets to: how do you manage success, and maintain meritocracy (economic and political).There’s a new wrinkle that is relatively exclusive to our time. I owe a hat-tip to AfA and PeterJB for this. Their question is “how do you deal with a societal system that hits the “container” wall at a velocity faster than the society’s adaptation mechanisms can respond to?”That’s where we are. This may come as a shock, but I see the econ meltdown as only one slice of the “world’s-achangin’” set of issues our society faces. It’s a symptom of the rest of the forces at work (population, energy, information, environment), not the fundamental cause.The good news is that the econ meltdown will precipitate the “bitter political strife” you mentioned. I don’t fear this, I welcome it with open arms. This desperately needs to happen, and it isn’t happening in any significant way at the U.S. national level at the moment.Mandarin, you clearly have a grip on this part of the problem, and I invite you to post early and often about it.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:15 pm

I vote for 3) other. I want the system to do a “graceful implode”, and I want to be ready with ideas and consensus when the implosion is complete, so that the fools that screwed things up to start with can’t use their economic advantages to keep things the same.That’s the main reason I’m hoping to see the “what’s next?” debate get started without any additional delay. The implosion is accelerating, and I can’t really predict how long it’ll take. Remember, this isn’t 1932, and news, information, and money moves so dreadfully quickly. The “next reality” will not take 10 years to form like it did last time. It’ll be more like 2-3 years. Remember how the “world changed” after 9-11? That’s because we let fools frame the issues, and we had no political force in place to counteract their stupidity.

Mike PetersSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:28 pm

Well done ProfessorYou were spot on with your analysis.Though I think you are underestimating how bad this is going to get. As the bubbles of notional capital evaporate, there is a political and military dimension.Mike PetersChristchurchNew Zealand

SharonSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:29 pm

Great article! I have learned so much over the past few months regarding this credit crisis and now I know just enough to make me very scared.The one question I have is whether or not the government will begin printing out massive amounts of money in order to inflate our way out of this mess. Can anyone shed some light on this??? I keep reading that deflation will set in followed by massive hyperinflation.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

visited, read several website,i sense fearwriters are spewing more words than they usually doand that = anxietyprolonged anxiety = panicit is even noticeable here, see the response to today’s post

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:37 pm

Imagine there’s no countries…and no banks. Gold is money. It’s held by individuals in storehouses. At most, credit takes the form of contracts between individuals and the consequences of default are limited. A better system? Perhaps. If all individuals are self-sufficient, if all are farmers or craftsmen. The rub is this–under this arrangement the quickest way to accumulate wealth is simply — plunder. Stealing. Pre-modern systems of money and credit were as compatible with the Pharaohs and the Caesars as they were with the Republic.One day a bright person comes up with the idea of fractional reserve banking. It promises a concentration of capital, its employment in large enterprises that generate wealth; it expands the amount of money, the volume of trade. It becomes an idea whose time has come. Debt and subordination to debt become universal under this system, it’s true. Money becomes a focus of political power and credit crises become regular events, large in scope.Who stole the Republic? For every Andrew Jackson fighting against a central bank, there was an Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson had his John Adams. Before there was manipulation by the central bank, there was bogus credit and money panics on a smaller scale,by smaller banks. Before widespread slavery to debt, there was — outright bondage.Getting rid of the Fed is probably a good idea. Here’s a better one: get rid of money altogether. It corrupts

Average JaneSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:42 pm

I’d like to know just how I was involved in the bubble-up, with all due respect, outerbeltway. We Middle Class wage earners have seen our wages do nothing for 10 years. My buying power has eroded substantially. Instead of being the recipient of the trickle-down effect courtesy the Wall Street bankers who own my retirement account (to my eternal dismay), I have been trickled on. Please do explain how I was the beneficiary of all the huge bonuses of the hedge funders, the mortgage brokers, the IBs, et al. ad nauseum. And just so I’m clear here, I have a lot of respect for you.

ptmSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:43 pm

They are buying gold in Hong Kong. Gold is up almost $100 from this morning, now at $883.80 and climbing. Oil and the dollar are not moving. Amazing to see.

MarkSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:47 pm

But Cuba’s government is in no way rich. Heck, I recently read that the nation imports something like 70% of its food (which was a complete surprise to me given all the hype about their adjustment post USSR).And when Cuba succumbs to massive debt then what? The US will have only postponed the day in which automobile production ends…Mark

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 7:49 pm

:/The Army Times is reporting the Army is dedicating a “BCT” Brigage Combat Team dedicated to Northcom’s mission for North American operations.excerpt;But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one.—————————————————————–http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/09/army_homeland_090708w/Brigade homeland tours start Oct. 13rd Infantry’s 1st BCT trains for a new dwell-time mission. Helping ‘people at home’ may become a permanent part of the active ArmyBy Gina Cavallaro – Staff writerPosted : Monday Sep 8, 2008 6:15:06 EDTThe 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team has spent 35 of the last 60 months in Iraq patrolling in full battle rattle, helping restore essential services and escorting supply convoys.Now they’re training for the same mission — with a twist — at home.Beginning Oct. 1 for 12 months, the 1st BCT will be under the day-to-day control of U.S. Army North, the Army service component of Northern Command, as an on-call federal response force for natural or manmade emergencies and disasters, including terrorist attacks.It is not the first time an active-duty unit has been tapped to help at home. In August 2005, for example, when Hurricane Katrina unleashed hell in Mississippi and Louisiana, several active-duty units were pulled from various posts and mobilized to those areas.But this new mission marks the first time an active unit has been given a dedicated assignment to NorthCom, a joint command established in 2002 to provide command and control for federal homeland defense efforts and coordinate defense support of civil authorities.After 1st BCT finishes its dwell-time mission, expectations are that another, as yet unnamed, active-duty brigade will take over and that the mission will be a permanent one.“Right now, the response force requirement will be an enduring mission. How the [Defense Department] chooses to source that and whether or not they continue to assign them to NorthCom, that could change in the future,” said Army Col. Louis Vogler, chief of NorthCom future operations. “Now, the plan is to assign a force every year.”The command is at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, Colo., but the soldiers with 1st BCT, who returned in April after 15 months in Iraq, will operate out of their home post at Fort Stewart, Ga., where they’ll be able to go to school, spend time with their families and train for their new homeland mission as well as the counterinsurgency mission in the war zones.Stop-loss will not be in effect, so soldiers will be able to leave the Army or move to new assignments during the mission, and the operational tempo will be variable.Don’t look for any extra time off, though. The at-home mission does not take the place of scheduled combat-zone deployments and will take place during the so-called dwell time a unit gets to reset and regenerate after a deployment.The 1st of the 3rd is still scheduled to deploy to either Iraq or Afghanistan in early 2010, which means the soldiers will have been home a minimum of 20 months by the time they ship out.In the meantime, they’ll learn new skills, use some of the ones they acquired in the war zone and more than likely will not be shot at while doing any of it.They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control or to deal with potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.Training for homeland scenarios has already begun at Fort Stewart and includes specialty tasks such as knowing how to use the “jaws of life” to extract a person from a mangled vehicle; extra medical training for a CBRNE incident; and working with U.S. Forestry Service experts on how to go in with chainsaws and cut and clear trees to clear a road or area.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:10 pm

such kind of useless talk/comments need to be removed.People, if you don’t agree with the Prof. by all mean hit the keyboard and let us see your point of view also.

JPSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:12 pm

What happens in the next few years when the debt on these LBOs and semi-solvent public and private companies needs to be refinanced? Are we going to see retailers that can’t get credit lines for the holidays, companies that can’t make payroll because their working capital lines have been reduced or closed, and companies selling assets because they can’t refinance on favorable terms?

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:12 pm

I found your comments suggesting this has all been tried before very interesting. As they say, however, past performance is no guarantee of future results.While I believe there is much we can learn from studying the Great Depression, I am not prepared to concede that there are not some substantial distinctions between the circumstances then present and those we find today, nor am I willing to grant that the means and methods being exploited by Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson are so well tested that they can be described as anything other than “experimental.” It’s simply too easy to cultivate fallacies of faulty comparisons between the present and the past by reference to a few discrete similarities that distract from salient differences.Do you have a academic background in economic history, or do you keep up with this stuff for pleasure? I hope you’ll continue to post here regularly.SWK

MarkSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:14 pm

So let’s keep the freak-out, sky-is-falling talk to a minimum until it’s time for it. Remember, this is *your* economy that is at stake here.Are you saying that it ISN’T time? What time is it then?And Nazi Germany belonged to the people. Just because something is widespread and influences many doesn’t make it worth saving…I’ll continue to drum it into the minds of those who fail to consider reality- the current economic system is UNABLE to provide for the future because it is based on a growth model and growth is NO LONGER possible.We can perform all kinds of mental gymnastics, but none of it will alter the fact that we’re headed toward widespread suffering as our systems buckle under diminishing resources and increasing population.That stated, I DO agree that a more controlled descent will go a lot further, though it’s still a descent. What we shouldn’t do, however, is to continue to waste time and energy trying to prop up this system.Richard Heinberg’s book title “The Party’s Over” says it all.

kilgoresSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:31 pm

>How can we honestly say that any of this is justified based on the supposition that is just might be worse otherwise.Well, you can’t really. It’s a manifestation of the classic existential absurdity of being responsible for the consequences of choices that must be made, but with imperfect knowledge as to what the precise consequences of those actions will be. If one acts and things go south, one faces blame for acting. If one does nothing and things go south, one is blamed for doing nothing. As a culture, Americans tend to prefer any action to inaction — their leaders are always expected to be seen to be doing something, anything to address a crisis — and that drives much of what we are witnessing now, I imagine.As Teddy Roosevelt said:”It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled… The credit belongs to the man who is in the arena, whose face is married by the dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly….. and spends himself in a worthy cause and.…. if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat.”Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson, stumbling though they may be, deserve some credit for being the ones actually in the arena. I think it is fair game to criticize what they are doing and how they are doing it, but as I’ve said before, I’m thankful I am not the one who has to be making these monumental decisions that, one way or another, will impact not just the U.S. economy, but the global economy for years to come.SWK

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:32 pm

Dear anything-but-average Jane: You didn’t benefit from the wall street payola.The middle class got treated to slower reduction of buying power than would ordinarily have been the case than if we didn’t do the borrowing from the rest of the world. Remember, ever since dot-com crash, we’ve put off the reckoning we’re about to face with borrowing.The debate we’re about to have about “what do we base our economy on now?” should have happened 10 years ago. That should have been what we did as a nation instead of going down the 9/11 neo-con rabbit hole, from which we are just now emerging.This is the price our country is paying for not (as a nation, not as the intrepid individuals on this blog) paying attention to what our “leaders” were doing.You are absolutely correct to say “middle class did not benefit nearly so much as shysters on wall street”. Correct. They used our ignorance and trust in the most horrible way against us. The only defense for this is to learn the lesson, and prepare ourselves so that it doesn’t occur so badly next time.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:36 pm

Question: Many people here say that the US dollar may lose tremendous value (even become “worthless”). Please help me understand how this would affect the average American. Does it just inflate the prices of our non U.S. made goods and staples? And if we are connected in this global economy, wouldn’t the value of many other currencies also decline if American consumers can no longer afford to purchase their goods? I just don’t see how the dollar will become so worthless in America that it would no longer be accepted to even buy groceries! To me, a worthless dollar implies massive hyperinflation as it’s becoming worthless, but wouldn’t wages have to increase substantially to keep up with the eroding dollar? From what I see so far, people have much more fear of losing their jobs, not asking for wage increases. If a depression is to follow, the unemployed masses would riot if a loaf of bread cost $100.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:38 pm

Mark:I’m in agreement with everything you say. I advocate speedy, coherent, well-debated fundamental change, from the bottom up. I’ll help you achieve that in any way I can.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:41 pm

FEMA concentration camps in americahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OG1GKPMdUAConcentration Camp In Texashttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxYxTly-yo8&feature=relatedREX 84, FEMA BASE CAMPS, FEMA TRAINS, FEMA TRAILERS, FEMA OVENS, DETENTION BASEShttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBeLtkiQUfs&feature=iv&annotation_id=event_286925

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:45 pm

AJ:One more thing. American consumers have foolishly “bought” a lot of the snake oil that Wall and Madison Avenue plied them with. The American character has softened some over the years – managing “success” is tough. Think of all the rich kids that are so much softer than their parents. This is human nature, and it’s really hard to deal with this phenomena. I don’t know how to do it without “external coercion” like we’re seeing now.

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:49 pm

@ OBThere is something Marc Faber said a couple of days back about whether Fed actions will make things better, he replied “What the Fed does now is irrelevant”.Many thoughts crossed my mind about whether Bernanke/ Paulson did the right thing this week. Maybe yes, from a wholistic view point [I will never forgive them for not bailing in or out Lehman :( ]. And probably their actions were dictated by other factors/forces. Or maybe they are under political agendas and pressures. Or possibly they cannot see beyond the tip of their nose (which is a compliment given their repetitive lies :) ).So probably we are at one of those moments where action is irrelevant (in the medium term). All we can do, is prepare to make things better in the long term, be ready when the dust settles, and make sure we won’t make the same mistakes again (at least for the next two generations, that is). From this perspective, I am with you we should start thinking about what to do. The degree of denial and that of panic is/will be strong countering forces for any constructive actions/ positiv(ist) thinking.I am hoping that MA would throw some ideas about what kind of careers/professions he is thinking will be the ones of the future (ones that are beneficial and supportive to the broader economy). As for me, I am still in the early stages of my career, lacking much of experience, wisdom and maturity many here are pouring. All I got is a vision of things and some kind of innate uneasiness facing the orgy of the last 5 years I was introduced to the (high) finance industry and the distasteful and blind hypes of my fellow MBA’s.It is thanks to this site, Roubini and great contributors (by the way where are you OR, I hope (not) you are not missing this from where you are) that I started to find shape to my suspicions (good to know you are not alone).I am seriously thinking about a career that would benefit the economy (this is why I have been attracted to Finance in the first place). All I hope from a discussion here is to generate ideas about new business models in how to match sound savings to sound investments (to be brief).@ Average Jane,I hear your anger, a sheeple that does not struggle while being leaded to the slaughterhouse is equally a victim as it is an accomplice. Of course there are exceptions and there is the fact that most sheep do not know where they are being driven.

ptmSeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:53 pm

Hyperinflation has occurred many times before and in many places (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation). And it’s happening now in Zimbabwe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_Zimbabwe).See http://www.energybulletin.net/node/23259 for a personal tour of Russia’s economic collapse. Here are a few choice take-aways:Expect shortages of fuel, food, medicine, and countless consumer items, outages of electricity, gas, and water, breakdowns in transportation systems and other infrastructure, hyperinflation, widespread shutdowns and mass layoffs, along with a lot of despair, confusion, violence, and lawlessness. We definitely should not expect any grand rescue plans, innovative technology programs, or miracles of social cohesion.When faced with such developments, some people are quick to realize what it is they have to do to survive, and start doing these things, generally without anyone’s permission. A sort of economy emerges, completely informal, and often semi-criminal. It revolves around liquidating, and recycling, the remains of the old economy. It is based on direct access to resources, and the threat of force, rather than ownership or legal authority. People who have a problem with this way of doing things, quickly find themselves out of the game.Expect the transition to permanent unemployment to be quite abrupt for most people. Very little will be obtained for money which will be treated as tokens rather than as wealth and shared among friends. Many things, such as housing will be either free or almost free. Economic collapse tends to shut down both local production and imports, and so it is vitally important that anything you own wears out slowly, and that you can fix it yourself if it breaks. Old debts will never be repaid.Economic collapse is about the worst possible time for someone to suffer a nervous breakdown, yet this is what often happens. The people who are most at risk psychologically are successful middle-aged men. When their career is suddenly over, their paper savings are gone, and their property worthless, much of their sense of self-worth is gone as well. They tend to drink themselves to death and commit suicide in disproportionate numbers. Since they tend to be the most experienced and capable people, this is a staggering loss to society.

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 8:54 pm

The credit markets were suggesting for some time that a big number of corporate defaults are underway for the next year or so. So …LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:16 pm

I believe this is the traditional mechanism many economists use to gauge the possibility of hyperinflation. Wages, and for reasons you stated, are under tremendous downward pressures and would not be able to follow price inflation.But we are not living in traditional times. There are so many conflicting forces set in motion currently that makes defining the outcome or the way to get to that outcome very difficult. Leverage and credit and (by consequence asset prices) are unwinding rapidly reinforcing a deflationary process. On the other hand, bailouts, losses and bankruptcies are weighting on currency flows and treasury issuance and purchase. Then there is international competition and hoarding and imported inflationary policies from countries such as China. Add to that the risk of a global recession especially a slowdown in critical dollar and US treasuries buyer countries and the possibility of a break up of the Bretton Woods II. One of the critical thing to put in mind is to know the time frame withing which each of these factors play out (a thing I am still undecided about)As I see it, I do not believe that we are about to see hyperinflation (a la Zimbabwe). However, one of the scenarios I envision is a big squeeze of consumers with effects similar to that of superinflation but with unnoticeable characteristics from traditional inflation metrics. As I explained sometime before, instead of prices going up 30% and your disposable income going up 10% and available credit up 10%, envision what would happen of prices go up 10%, your income stays the same and your credit lines are shut. You are much worse off in the second scenario even if the CPI is much lower.LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:23 pm

Most of the computers held sensitive data and none used encryption or passwords, apparently. They were misplaced, stolen, etc.

PhilTSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:23 pm

Dear OuterBeltway :I have read with great interest and a sense of optimism your postings in many previous threads, and have even noticed/felt the absence of your postings recently, but this is the first time I am replying to you.As far as this particular forum goes, I must say, that you have really done a terrific job of raising the bar for all involved, especially during this very chaotic time. I believe that there are many people who are on your frequency and maybe even more forward in the process, in a very organic way.I think what is happening at this juncture is a rude awakening for many people who have lived/led a fairly privileged lifestyle/standard of living yet not realized it or perhaps taken it for granted. There are far greater numbers of our population who have not enjoyed this lifestyle (quite the opposite in fact) and they have already adapted/created a lifestyle that is in line with what many are postulating will be a lower living standard.While we all may have grand plans on how to move forward from here, what needs to evolve IMHO are the very basic behaviors that underlie this gigantic mess, systemic collapse, etc. I honestly do not know how severe things must get in order for many of us to abandon our ways and begin to move forward, but I do think there will be a direct correlation between the severity of these crises/ensuing fallout AND a general unwillingness to come to grips with the individual and group behaviors that got us here.The catastrophic and ongoing morass that is Katrina wasn’t enough, … I’ll just stop from alluding to any further examples as we all could build that long list and I think the point is made … but the the thicker the vale of denial and thus delay of the inevitable, the worse off it’s going to be. I have read all of the comments on this sub-thread AND I tend to think that MANDARIN has articulated a realistic viewpoint, yet I still see myself as a realist leaning towards optimist with large doses of healthy skepticism.Looking forward to viewing your plan if you are making it available.Cheers !

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:31 pm

AfA:No doubt you will make a huge contribution. Let me start by encouraging your effort to match (allocate) resources to those activities that best solve the fundamental problems of our time.So, let me follow your lead, and maybe we can instigate a followup post, not just from MA, but from all the rest of the luminaries that frequent this blog.One way to approach the “what’s next” problem is to examine the average household’s income statement, and make it a proxy for the nation’s.What are the main household resource consumers, and which is substitutable with lower-cost, domestically-producable products?Remember, every percentage point you shave off the “average household expenses” is a huge, huge amount of resources that can be re-purposed to something smart…like education. Recall also that the household is what drives all the rest of the economy. It is a very effective lens though which to view the “what’s next?” problem.Another point. Mark says “the perma-growth model is dead”. He’s absolutely right. The jar we’re in isn’t getting any bigger. It’s fixed, and we’re crowded up against the edge (and BRIC hasn’t even started to industrialize).What would the household income statement look like if:a. every generation didn’t have to buy a new house, because they simply lived in or exchanged for another the house they inherited from their parentsb. information workers didn’t commute. We bring the work to them instead of bringing them to the work (as if we were all still working in steel mills)c. towns were re-designed so that you didn’t have to travel more than a mile to get any product you use more than once a weekI can go on, but you get the idea. It is now possible to redesign the living patterns of humanity. Most of the stuff to change is obvious. The sticky wicket is humanity’s ability to deal with the intellectual and emotional labor of change. I’m terrible at it myself, but I do realize it’s something I’ve just got to work on.So how do you get good at change? How do you get good at allocating the necessary resources to the people and processes that help change happen quickly and efficiently?This is a good Q for OR, as he travels throughout many societies, and if I remember correctly, he is/was a university professor.

Big CahoonaSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:53 pm

Let’s all acknowledge the prescient call about the the financial crisis by Professor Roubini. Also, can we agree to maintain an intellectual discussion as opposed to an emotional one? Anti-semitism is often and incorrectly associated with hostility towards Jews specifically. Semitic cultures are wide ranging and diverse and include Arabs among many other groups of people. What is important here is that I here only one voice in the media warning us about the probable depths of this crisis. That voice is Professor Roubini’s. I am not here to worship him per se, but to acknowledge him and thank him. Negligence and cronyism in Washington D.C. and on Wall Street is destroying our economy and we have to do something about it. Bailing out these corporations and FNM and FRE are not the right thing to do and will not solve the problem. It sends the wrong message, sets a terrible example, and illustrates our hypocrisy. How can we expect other countries to believe that free-markets and democracy are the best choice when we have become more socialist than they are?

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:55 pm

Let’s hope that precisely one person attempts to set the agenda, control the distribution of concerns, and arrogate to himself the position of arbiter of thought on matters of “creative” solutions to the financial crisis. It’s not clear that the intellectual marketplace could accommodate more than one person temporizing all viewpoints other than his own.

Average JaneSeptember 17th, 2008 at 9:56 pm

I do agree that we have certainly tried to “shelter” the X, Y and Z generations, clearly not to their benefit nor ours. The herd mentality as you might imagine is difficult to combat. I mean really, do we all “need” an iPod? What is most difficult for me is all our leadership leading us all to the slaughter — better put your money into those 401ks, hurry up and “shelter” your income in that IRA, all of which went into the rathole of the stock market, with which I’ve been major-league uncomfortable for years, only to have the rug quite literally pulled out from under us all. An ownership society indeed–did I ever really “own” that money I socked into my Roth IRA? Sure doesn’t look like it–it’s lost at least 15% so far this year and it appears as though I am starting to lose my principal. And I still remember the crash of 2000 when one of my coworkers stated he lost fully half of his retirement plan and it took eight solid years to get it back up to where it was before the crash. He should consider himself lucky to have done even that. We were all told to “diversify” all the while seeing interest on simple savings accounts shrivel to near nothing. Consume, mighty consumer! Spend, spend, to keep the terrorists away!–says president Bush. And BTW, let’s put all your Social Security money into the hands of the Wall Street den of thieves. Arrrrgh! But thank you, outerbeltway, for your thoughts and good wishes. And one thing we should all try to remember: we the sheeple are, after all, the “government.” Aren’t we?

Average JaneSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:02 pm

Thanks for hearing me, Afa. You’re one of my personal favorites of the People of this Blog. I’m in the legal field, by the way, and certain areas of the law are burgeoning–guess which ones? Think I might be safely employed (fingers crossed) given my litigation experience.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

So, WHAT is the speedy, coherent, well-debated fundamental change from the bottom up that you are advocating?You talk about channeling fear and rage into actioninstead of blogging, but NOBODY is actually ACTING!All you people do is just talk and don’t even offer ANY suggestions on what ACTIONS one may take, much less actually do something.

NeophyteSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:14 pm

How right you are!I broach the next subject delicately. His accusers charge that he nearly single-handedly torpedoed the housing and financial market when he wrote the laws that took down the Depression-era barriers between investment and commercial banks. Was it a bad idea in retrospect?”The law has come under fire from the same people whose solution to every problem is always more and more government control of the economy,” he says. “Broadening the base of financial institutions had nothing to do with the subprime problem. There’s every evidence that the markets were made more stable by the diversification. J.P. Morgan could not have bought Bear Stearns and prevented a meltdown without Gramm-Leach-Bliley.” (laughter)http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121460589609712025.html

friend of washington mutualSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:17 pm

I think Washington mutual will have a better luckTo sell itself by wearing a mini skirt with the boots and walking across 42nd street in Manhattan.

artichokeSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:18 pm

Nouriel says that in the current system, the stand-alone investment bank is unviable.This should not be surprising.Recall that the Glass-Steagall act forced the separation of these operations from commercial banks. The demise of Glass-Steagall allowed the reintegration of these operations, and indeed it is a better business model to be able to skim from retail customers to buffer an investment bank, and to have depositors to protect so that one is too-big-to-fail, than to have to stand alone. In very good times the stand-alone model is fine, but under stress the IB wants to shelter itself under a commercial bank.That is exactly what Glass-Steagall is meant to avoid, and it is why we have to be so careful now about the commercial banks. If Lehman fails, Main Street doesn’t really care. But if JPMorgan-Chase fails, watch out below. The combined model allows the extraction of protection from the government.We should re-institute Glass-Steagall. Also, ban non-insurance insurance like CDS. And don’t inflate the housing bubble by forcing banks to lend to those who are not credit worthy. Those are the proper lessons from this debacle.But instead it will be used as an excuse for further mucking up our system, I suppose, as LB predicts.

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:28 pm

And you need to check with PeterJB, given that all the greed, incompetence, faith-based economics, leadership crisis … need to be sorted out firstly :-) LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

FRIEND OF WASHINGTON MUTUALSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:30 pm

YOU HAVE TO WRAP THOSE CDS WITH SOME WEEDS, AND THEN YOU BURN IT. YOU WILL MAKE ALL GORE HAPPY, YOU ARE RECYCLING THE CDS.

P&LSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:34 pm

Instead of selling the concepts of “More” and “Bigger” to people, why can’t they be sold on “Smaller” and “Better”? If Americans have demonstrated any particular talent as a people lately, it’s been consumption. Maybe it’s human nature, but maybe it’s because they’ve been “sold” on the value of non-essential CRAP. Let’s sell them something better. Maybe they’ll be willing to “Say YES to LESS” if it can be wrapped up in a righteous and patriotic wrapper? Alan Schumacher’s Small Is Beautiful?

artichokeSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

It’s good to awaken.My career path is different. I knew that finance, economics, etc. was just shuffling paper around and wanted to do something useful, so I was an engineer for about 10 years. Then I tired of being treated as a second class citizen vs. the finance types so I decided to get trained in finance so I learned and taught that for a while and now work in the industry. For sure, it’s not to be useful to the economy. It’s still just paper shuffling, but boy is it exciting sometimes!Don’t fool yourself that finance is some great helpful enterprise, there is about one economic concept that supports that argument (“gains from trade”) which applies with appropriate assumptions and limitations — risk sharing is a special case of that same idea — and to expand that to this sort of financial inverse pyramid built on sand is ludicrous. If you want to help someone, make something he needs. A CDO isn’t it. Even a bond isn’t it.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:35 pm

Average Jane:I think you’ve provided an excellent summary of most of the scams that have been perpetrated on the U.S. citizen over the past century. Note that many of them didn’t emanate from Wall Street. Some came from the oil interests, some from the NeoCons, some from Defense industry, and of course all of them abetted by the Media Giants, for whom we shall all be forever grateful.It seems like the only thing they have in common is to convince us that we need something we don’t, and to get us to commit to buying it forevermore.One excellent defense mechanism we have is to find places where smart people congregate, and to exchange information. Wolves prey on the weak; we become stronger at places like this.Best of the evening to all.

friend of washington mutualSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:39 pm

wells Fargo and citi make sure you bring prince alwaleed to your orgy with Washington mutual, I heard from mayor Giuliani he have a real large one..

AnonymousSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Nouriel isn’t pessimistic enough! This crisis will be more severe than the great depression and last much longer.

ptmSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Finally, a call for what this country needs the most. And while we are at it, let’s sprinkle a little debt-based monetary theory and the private Federal Reserve.Mincher: Why America needs financial literacy in every schoolhttp://www.statesman.com/opinion/content/editorial/stories/09/0918mincher_edit.html

WaterSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

Being “TREATED” to slower reduction of buying power’?The Middle Class was SOLD OUT by NAFTA, Globalization, inflation, government and corporate malfeasance and corruption.The dotcom crash could have long since played out AND the middle class would still be ahead. Instead of turning to credit to maintain a normal standard of living, the middle class could have benefited from their OWN increase in worker productivity instead of it being STOLEN by corporations in collusion with the government.The lesson has already been learned, but what kind of defeatest additude is “prepare ourselves so that it doesn’t occur so badly next time”? You are either going to be a victim or not.

AfASeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:49 pm

Morgan and Wachovia:Love from the first sight, orThe story of Ministers getting married (with a gun on their head)”Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) — Morgan Stanley is weighing a merger with Wachovia Corp. and several other banks as the securities firm seeks to regain investor confidence after its shares sank 42 percent this week, people familiar with the matter said.”It looks like Professor’s prediction that none of the broker-dealers will not remain independent is coming true faster than he predicted/ feared.What about Goldman Sachs? When is the wedding? Or will they both have a common ceremony? I am thinking that the amount of forced mergers and acquisitions would have salivated the IB’s during the M&A hype, if only they were not targets.Credit crisis victims (VIP):- Bear Sterns- Lehman- Countrywide- AIG- Merrill- Morgan Stanley …LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

ptmSeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:49 pm

Afa, I’ll let John Williams address this issue…JOHN WILLIAMS’ SHADOW GOVERNMENT STATISTICS, A L E R T, September 17, 2008, Treasury and Fed Rev Up the Currency Printing Presses, Has a Run on the System Begun?, The Problem Remains Inflation, Not Deflation

… Recession and asset deflation are not at all inconsistent with price inflation, as was seen in the 1970s. There will be no price deflation without a sharp drop in the broad money supply (as in a year-to-year decline).Such a decline was not in the works, and current Fed and Treasury activity is promising even stronger money growth in the immediate future. Messrs Bernanke and Paulson tacitly have confirmed that they will create whatever money they have to create in order to prevent a systemic collapse.The various markets are about as volatile and dangerous as they can get. With extraordinary crosscurrents from the solvency crisis and various governmental and global central bank interventions in the markets and marketplace, volatility likely will continue, sometimes in directions that may seem irrational.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:55 pm

PhilT:Best regards to you. Please develop your excellent ideas (esp. the bottom-up, atomistic, can’t-be-managed-from-the-top parts). I am very worried that this upheaval will result in a more restrained, cosseted and managed society, with fewer options.I feel that many of us are ready to move ahead – we’ve learned a lot from the 20th century, and we’re ready to set the foundation for this next one. I desperately want us to shape that foundation w/o the stultifying repression of last century’s mentality.The internet has profoundly changed what’s possible – in terms of “who’s allowed to make the decision”. Information is everywhere now – it’s almost free for the first time ever. Only thing missing is improved consensus-building and problem-solving tools.I encourage you to ask yourself “If I was architect of America’s economy from 2015 through 2030, what would we excel at? Where would we apply ourselves? What would be our contribution to global welfare?”I’d love to hear your ideas. So would everyone else.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 17th, 2008 at 10:58 pm

Guest:If I was wealthy, and could make an on-the-spot award of $1000 to the poster that made the most cogent, constructive, incisive comment of the day, you’d get it.I have to crash for tonight. Next time you seem me post, you challenge me with that one again. I’ll hammer it.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:17 pm

I have gleaned, willy-nilly, economic kernels from Roubini’s previous post as my way of battening down the hatches for the duration of the coming storm. I am passing them on with apologies to the Professor for any distortions – but they paint such a clear picture of this incredible panorama of market developments. Many macro points were eliminated to emphasis the others. His view in August:The financial and banking crisis will be severe and last several years leading to a severe and persistent liquidity and credit crunch.This is the crisis of an entire subprime financial system: losses are spreading…and the collapse of many counterparties—will lead to a systemic collapse of this market.[H]undreds of small banks and a significant fraction of regional banks but also some major money center banks will become effectively insolvent…In a few years there will be no more independent broker dealers…The FDIC is already requesting to Congress that the deposit insurance premia should be raised… too little and too late…the biggest credit bubble in U.S. history is now going bust…This is not earnings smoothing, this is active manipulation and falsification of financial results aimed at creating even more obfuscation of the true state of financial institutions…actively abetted by the SEC, the Fed and all other regulators…to avoid at any cost anything that may trigger a financial meltdown…[T]he Fannie and Freddie bailout is actually a bailout of the mortgage market and of every institution that is in the mortgage origination business…The Fed has directly and indirectly systemically subsidized and propped up the financial system and the earnings of bank and non-bank financial institutions…The entire Federal Home Loan Bank system…has been used to prop hundreds of mortgage lenders…Countrywide more than $51 billion…Citigroup, Bank of America and most other US mortgage lenders…dozens of billions of dollars each…[T]he recovery of the economy from this recession will be weak as the financial crisis and serious macro imbalances will lead to sub-par (below trend) economic growth for years to come.[W]e are facing a stagflationary shock to oil, energy and other commodity prices…[A] severe US recession and global slowdown will lead to a sharp reduction in inflationary pressures in the US: slack in goods markets… slack in labor markets with unemployment rising…a fall in commodity prices of the order of 30%…Says Roubini: “Since I wrote those words in August financial and economic are severely deteriorated; we are now closer to the financial meltdown…Stock prices are sharply down and there is a risk of a market crack…there is a beginning of a silent bank run as depositors are nervous…many hedge funds are now teetering…the financial turmoil is becoming global with stock markets all over the world plunging.”Worst of all, policy authorities are now running out of bullets and going towards desperate measures…”…policy reaction is to try to build a new set of levies while the financial perfect storm of the century has destroyed the first set of levies……now after having nationalized the mortgage market…the government is also starting to manipulate directly the stock market ~…the Fed is accepting even more toxic collateral……waiving Section 23A……an attempt to bail-in the private sector and provide a private lender of last resort support of the financial system is at work…but this…will not work since if any firm were to access this facility…it will signal severe trouble…and the run will continue……since Lehman is bust the new line of defense was the takeover of Merrill by BofA…another reckless gamble……policy rate cut will make no difference…the economy does not suffer only of illiquidity; more seriously it suffers of severe credit and solvency problems…“The ability of policy authorities to prop financial markets is rapidly eroding as market participants perceive that policy makers are desperate and running out of options. At this point the perfect financial storm of the century cannot be contained. The only light at the end of the tunnel is the one of the coming financial and economic train wreck.” NR September 16, 2008

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:38 pm

A number of stock market call-in programs I’ve heard are handing out horrible advice to innocent investors, such as, “don’t panic, just hold on, this is likely to just be a little ‘blip’ in the long-term market trend.”They need, instead, to check out advice from former finance professor, Mike Rozeff, whose post today sizes up, no less, the investing philosophy of The Fed:“The Fed’s Failure” by Michael S. RozeffSeptember 17, 2008: The first and most important rule of speculation is to cut your losses quickly, while they are still small. In poker, this means folding when you don’t have good cards. In research and development, it means halting investment when the initial results are unpromising. In stock speculation, it means selling a purchase when it falls by 7–8 percent below a well-chosen entry level.The first loss is the smallest, the saying goes. The Fed is violating that rule, and it is encouraging banks to violate that rule. It is doubling down on a bad hand. It is buying more stock as it falls, instead of selling out. How is it doing this? The Fed is lending more and more of its liquid government securities to client banks. In return, it is accepting their questionable and risky collateral.The Fed is making three kinds of bad loans. First, the Fed is lending to banks that are in bad shape and need the funds badly. They are simply bad risks. If the Fed were a profit-maximizing banker, it would not make such loans, throwing good money after bad. The Fed is simply gambling (not wisely speculating) that in time these banks will recover. The gamble is huge; the amounts it is lending are a huge portion of its assets.Second, the Fed is lending to banks that have agreed to take over some other failing financial institution, like JP Morgan Chase taking over Bear Stearns and Bank of America taking over Merrill Lynch.These buyouts and these loans are hastily arranged affairs. The buying bank doesn’t really know what liabilities it is absorbing, and neither does the Fed. More often than not, mergers do not work out at all well. The costs of bringing two organizations together often are far greater than the buyers imagined.These mergers will end up weakening the stronger bank as it absorbs the corpse of the weaker bank. No prudent banker would make such large loans on such short notice. The Fed is not a prudent banker.Third, the Fed is lending to banks that have themselves agreed (under Fed pressure) to make loans to such failing giants as AIG. The Fed then has an indirect stake in making loans to a very risky enterprise like AIG. Again, both the lending banks and the Fed weaken themselves by making these loans that are supposed to shore up and save a failing institution…http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff220.html

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:39 pm

OutBeltWay:A compliment? Followed by inaction.It’s actually rather insulting.Are you only here for the entertainment value, polishing your debating skills.

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:48 pm

@ Mark… I’ve recently been to Cuba for an international baseball tournament. (“Recently” while working 8-6 for the world’s largest custodian) I toured the country, and played their teams, and met their people.You can’t put a price on the spirit of these people! (The people love this country. I think their controlling parties would be very open to a mutually beneficial plan (even if on the global scope, this is small)With that said, aside from the US not wanting an enemy 90 miles away from our border… Cuba could become an international power station. The gulf winds, lined across that country by 2015 could power Florida. The solar exposure is abundant!When you want to halt this death spiral of bad economics… you don’t do it with a sweeping master plan. IT DOESN”T EXIST! This has gotten too complex.) You fix it with a lot of little plans… plans that are aimed at the future.Key words: “Mutually beneficial” Doing good for others will be a necessary moral code for the future.I’ve said my peace.Miss America

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:49 pm

@ Mark… I’ve recently been to Cuba for an international baseball tournament. (“Recently” while working 8-6 for the world’s largest custodian) I toured the country, and played their teams, and met their people.You can’t put a price on the spirit of these people! (The people love this country. I think their controlling parties would be very open to a mutually beneficial plan (even if on the global scope, this is small)With that said, aside from the US not wanting an enemy 90 miles away from our border… Cuba could become an international power station. The gulf winds, lined across that country by 2015 could power Florida. The solar exposure is abundant!When you want to halt this death spiral of bad economics… you don’t do it with a sweeping master plan. IT DOESN”T EXIST! This has gotten too complex.) You fix it with a lot of little plans… plans that are aimed at the future.Key words: “Mutually beneficial” Doing good for others will be a necessary moral code for the future.I’ve said my peace.Miss America

WaterSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:52 pm

Very good points.How on earth can they perform due diligence on such large institutions with such complexity in so little time?They can’t.

GuestSeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:53 pm

Fed Prepared to Take Bigger Role in Combating Financial CrisisSept. 18 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve officials are signaling they are prepared to take an even larger role in trying to contain the deepening financial crisis.A day after Fed officials seized control of American International Group Inc., the Treasury yesterday acted at the Fed’s request to fortify the central bank’s balance sheet with $100 billion in new cash. Fed officials can use the proceeds to pump money into financial institutions fearful of lending to each other, or to catch the next insolvent bank that’s unable to raise capital.

MASeptember 17th, 2008 at 11:58 pm

I keep hearing the terms “turmoil”, “recession” etc… At what point does it become OK to use the word “crash”… when describing the Hong Kong Market???Does 50% in under a year qualify?Miss America

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:03 am

That was not the FINANCE I was referring to. Companies, entrepreneurs still need to have access to funding. They still need someone who knows how to assess their strengths, potentials and risks. Investors still want to make sure that their investments are being distributed to the most profitable businesses ….Not Some crappy speculative cds (in the name of financial innovation and engeneering) that we have to burn.

JLCSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:34 am

Guess the Chinese are gettin’ pissed.UPDATE 1-China paper urges new currency order after “tsunami”http://www.reuters.com/article/usDollarRpt/idUSPEK2402720080917?sp=true

MarcoSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:56 am

PROTOCOLS ELDERS OF ZION ?Sir, with so many examples from real world (Gaza, Irak, Lebanon, next bombed-bombed-bombed Iran) why are you hiding yourself in the magic world of fantasy ? Perhaps, are you Alice-in-wonderland sir ?

Christian MarxSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:25 am

The consumer is too big to fail.The rich should not be the only recipients of debt relief–and it won’t work. The flip side of the argument that there aren’t enough wealthy people to tax to produce enough tax revenue for the government is that the wealthy don’t have enough bad credit to forgive to resolve the credit crisis.Consumers need debt relief–this could be arranged on an equitable basis, and public funds could be allocated for this purpose. If it isn’t done, and only the wealthy are bailed out, there still won’t be enough good credit to resolve the credit crisis.

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:53 am

Yes, it is safe to say that. Nothing will happen to you.We are in the 4th inning in a 9-inning game.And the championship has just started.LET’S BURN SOME CDS

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 1:57 am

Miss America: “Mutually beneficial”Sounds like an excellent strategy to me.Unfortunately doesn’t look like a viable one until a certain elite occupy the white house. And sadly I don’t see much change possible in November.In your opinion what can people do to squeeze even one half decent idea out of the head of someone in charge? Or, to sound more outerbeltwayish, what do you plan to do to make the world a better place?

Little SaverSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:19 am

Yes,rule 1: keep the faithrule 2: any use of terms that may undermine rule one is considered capital sin

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:24 am

greatest show on earth is an UNDERSTATEMENTHK mkt at one time went down by 7% 1000++ points!!!!and now up by 71!!!!!MADNESS??this is not madnessTHIS IS HEDGE FUUNDDSS

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:37 am

well the financial decisions the U.S. government is making are indeed closer to facism than socialism. They seem to be about increasing the government power, just like government power has been increased over peoples private lifes since 2001.So in that sense any FEMA camps would just fit the bill. But what would such be needed for? It is hard to visualize U.S. government starting to kill of its citizens. Although I suspect no one could have visualized Hitlers Nazi party of doing the atrocities it did, either…until they happened.

Little SaverSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:41 am

Hang Seng Index ends flat at 17,632.46Looks like a stand off between Fears and Greeds today, come and see tomorrow what next round will bring.

Saumil TrivediSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:35 am

Dear ProfessorI will be greatly obliged if you can throw some light on following mind boggling question:How can a trillion dollar size balance sheet company(AIG) reach a point where even liquidation of saleble assets such as airline leasing arm etc. if allowed over a period of time would yield a measely sum of 20 billion dollars? AND IF THIS IS TRUE ISN’T THE DAY FAR OFF WHEN THE ENTIRE US ECONOMY GOES BELLY UP?

IncognitoSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:58 am

“Central Banks Offer Extra Funds to Calm Money”"The Federal Reserve almost quadrupled the amount of dollars central banks can auction around the world to $247 billion in a fresh coordinated bid to ease financial markets facing their worst crisis since the 1920s….”"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former. ” Albert EinsteinAfter reading the above news about Central Banks’ action, you may replace “the human stupidity” part in Einstein’s quote with Central Bankers’ stupidity and see that it still perfectly works. It’s unbelievable to see what type of people running the whole system. I previously told that dollar will lose its reserve currency status in the medium run. I guess if liquidity injection goes in this manner, let alone the danger the dollar faces, metals will replace the paper money. Thus, we might end up going back to our origins and I contend you that I am not exaggerating the situation.This crisis may be incredible, unbelievable and inevitable. However, human actions may be credible, believable and evitable. But, some central bankers proved otherwise. It’s so sad that these people are not able to discern between liquidity and credit. The latter is not due to lack of money, it’s simply due to the lack of real production. Thus, the current crisis is not due to money, it’s due to the fact that a large amount of money went into a small group of people who simple have no reason to invest into real economy. That’s why, in order to save the system; (1) Governments need a fiscal policy to regulate the distribution of income to jump start the investment again, (2) Monetary authorities need to penalize those that caused this havoc when bailing out the financial system.

GloomySeptember 18th, 2008 at 6:37 am

THE END OF GENERAL ELECTRICComing soon to a theatre near you, GE will be added to the United States Sovreign Debt Fund (joining Fannie, Freddie, and AIG). With the highest percentage of level 3 assets relative to total assets of any non-bankrupt company(http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/08/level-three-ass.html ), the handwriting is on the wall.When GE is nationalized the level of chaos will reach new heights. After America’s finest corporation goes down, it will be clear that America has gone down.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 6:43 am

Alessandro, gloomy :have a look at this :http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20080918a.htmToday, the Bank of Canada, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank (ECB), the Federal Reserve, the Bank of Japan, and the Swiss National Bank are announcing coordinated measures designed to address the continued elevated pressures in U.S. dollar short-term funding markets. These measures, together with other actions taken in the last few days by individual central banks, are designed to improve the liquidity conditions in global financial markets.can someone explain to me why is there a shortage in USD short-term funding?..banks hoarding cash or more sinister?? why must it e USD and not home currency?mrskeptical

Free TibetSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:09 am

@ Miss AmericaWith reference to your question yesterday would I reconsider what I had said about Cuba being not important.No. I’m sticking to my story. But I hope you haven’t misunderstood. I said that in the context of an economics blog. Cuba’s economy is not important. And it’s only not important in an international context. This isn’t the place for this. But you’ve taught me a lot about how cash shapes the markets and with respect for that here goes.As you point out Cuba has a land mass about that of Florida. But it has a population of, today, 11 million plus the 2-3 million Cubans or Cuban/Americans who came here and the American born families of those. What is important is that something approaching 30% of the population left the island. They left everything. In some cases they left wives and children. They started over and they made it. I hope you can forgive them if they determine not to give that carajo anything more.I have no idea what Cuban GDP might be. It’s probably hard for the statisticians to put a figure on it. If I were to make the effort maybe I could look it up. Anyway, their economy has always depended on sugar, tobacco, tourism – and Russian subsidies. They’re not competitive in the production of sugar any longer. Probably due to a lack of investment. They can’t produce enough tobacco for the cigars they make. That has something to do with a tobacco disease. And they don’t want to go too far with the tourism thing. Probably because of the memory of the mob business you mentioned. The mob liked it there because it was wide open. Not because there was real opportunity. They could spend their prostitution dollars there and nobody asked questions. They had Batista and his buddys bought off. He was one of them. That contributed to the revolution. The take home lesson is that more sugar, more cigars, or more tourism closer to the US shore is not essential to global growth.Cuba is not our enemy. I don’t know if you meant that they were or that they might become our enemy if we were not to lift those sanctions. Forget about it. They are not and they won’t be. Though it’s inevitable that the sanctions eventually be lifted it won’t be done until the Cuban/American community has decided that it’s time to do so. Now, here’s what I think. Although, I’ve spoken to people who disagree with me. When the sanctions are eventually lifted the money to develop Cuba is already on deposit in the bank of Miami. Don’t rush it. When the time is right it will be a flood. As a matter of policy the US doesn’t have to do anything.The business about a Russian space center in Cuba is just a joke. Forget about that too. Your children’s children will not see that. Just propaganda to poke their finger in the US’s eye. The Russians perfected that during the cold war. Though in a crisis American politicians can hold their own. In the last day or so somebody mentioned the fact that the Russians were holding military exercises with Chavez. The comment was that it only proved that they still had ships that would sail that far. Hear! I rather imagine they will fill up the fuel tanks before leaving Venezuela. That would be a good idea.And incidentally, if there were ever an example that should persuade the US to rethink its immigration policy Cuba should be it.I’ve always enjoyed your posts and I’ve learned a lot from you. I hope this clarifies my view.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:27 am

Deregulation is the whole cause for this mess, starting with the repeal of the Glass-Steagel Act, enacted after the great depression, with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act eight years ago. Yes, Gramm is Phil Gramm, the head economist for McCain. Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves and us taxpayers in the process. It happened with Enron, it’s happening again here.

FRIEND OF WASHINGTON MUTUALSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:33 am

I THINK THEY ARE SUPER DRUNK FROM ALL VODKA DRINKING YESTERDAY SO THEY DECIDED TO CLOSE THE MARKET TODAY.

randySeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:31 am

Do you really think GE could go belly up? Can you tell me more about their level 3 assets? Where did they come from? their finance arm? Please give me some idea. This concept scares me a lot.

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:44 am

MBC -You are using the greed of all parties involved (religious affiliation does not matter) to justify in your own mind your view of how and why the world may end. You find, much as the “End of Days” fanatics that this is yet another sign that the end is upon us as some book and or religion has told you.Well, let me offer another opinion of which you can take or leave:There is no one single religion that has the lock on an end of days scenario – indeed they all have an explanation for what happens when we die or cease to be in the physical world. They all share rules for living while alive (and vary from being nice to killing as many different people from you as possible) so that you may go to the good or bad places. There. Seeing anything familiar?You sir are no different from the fundamentalist christian who would advocate war in the middle east to bring about the rapture.Guess what – it’s not happening. No one is coming to save us from ourselves. We have done this and we will continue to do stupid things because we are human. That means we are not perfect and make lots of mistakes. The only things we can do now are to work together, try and limit greed, educate ourselves and try and make the future better than the present.Hanging on to stories created thousands of years ago as fact is amongst the dumbest thing I can imagine. The world has changed and moved on – perhaps we should too.You seek to provoke by peddling fear – religions have done this from the beginning – they prey upon the weak minded and those unwilling to ask questions. They need people who lack a sense of community and or family to fill their places of worship. They need people who need. Great minds, capable of independent and intelligent thought are interestingly enough absent in the congregations.Go pedal your fears elsewhere. Your desired future will not come – your savior is a myth. Oh and just like the leaders who like to question the patriotism of those who don’t fall into lockstep behind them, religions also tell you to not question their correctness, lest the all powerful will be all furious.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:47 am

so far, not really doing too much, just stabilized and slightly higher a bit…could turn over and keel over soon…

Tragedian of the CommonsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:13 am

Borrowing short term isn’t going to help anyone. If I had several hundred billion dollars of liabilities in the form of illiquid debt obligations, I would need to be able to borrow in the long term to invest somewhere safe, and I would still need funds to pay down the obligation. Only the safe investments aren’t known. So the short term liquidity isn’t enough. I need long term liquidity at negative interest rates to break even.Of course, helping out the consumer would be off the table: raping the consumer at extortionate interest rates is necessary for me to stay in business. I can’t just forgive debts and devalue my assets even further. The next guy will make more money than me by gouging the consumer at higher rates.

MASeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:36 am

Thank god!!! Mayor Mike is to meet with Darth Paulson and Grand Admiral Chris Cox today.Hopefully the dark side will finally tap this resource. (and his team)IMO – Bloomberg would’ve been my top vote for President (as I’ve stated on this website many times in the past) I’ve met him and know people who work for him. He is the best “political” that I’ve seen, ESPECIALLY in a financial crisis. He is a straight shooter, not afraid to say who gotta take a hit, and what he thinks needs to be done.I’m not trying to make a political statement… but instead just saying that I am happy to see that Bloomy is getting involved.(note: Since becoming Mayor, he had to step away from his company to run this city Which was in a fiscal crisis at the time). This is just speculation on my part but… I bet had he still been running Bloomberg, he would’ve exposed the current risks in the economy much earlier and would’ve already made inroads to reform. Instead, he’s been burning the oil on fixing the economic nightmare of the aftermath of NYC’s debt from 9/11.)Miss America

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:44 am

what impact will this “coordinated effort” have on the dollar? Is this another CB conspiracy to strengthen it, against all fundamentals?

MASeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:47 am

Our difference of opinion stands for good debate. I just see it as a simple (small) fix that has future benefits. (not “world saving” benefits… or even “US saving”… but instead 1 of many baby steps that help us move forward.)…besides, what’s the harm? I just don’t see how does it “hurts us”?To me, “new thinking” is the “change” we need.Miss America

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:53 am

Thee has been a lot of commentary already on the AIG bailout. But i want to single out an excellent piece written by Dan Amerman at the following link:http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/amerman/2008/0917.htmlMr Amerman does a really good job of explaining how credit default swaps actually work, why there was tremendous temptation for people working in the CDS market to price risk to low levels, and why there are enormous dangers now inherent in the existing CDS contracts. It is well worth reading – and special thanks to Mr Amerman for taking the time to write this article.PeteCA

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:00 am

@MABig baseball, big in financials (gambling now), Cubaphiliac?Miss America is Cuban, fits the profile. Pre-1960′s probably ;)

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:02 am

Still on the AIG bailout … which represents are enormous step for the Fed. I’m not going to lanuch a tirade here – largely because I fully expect that Dr John Hussman will do that in his commentary next Monday morning (www.hussmanfunds.com). If Dr Hussman was upset about the bailout of Bear, then he should be incensed that the Fed has now bailed out an insurance company. We’ll see what he says :-) However, I will offer this piece of speculation. Besides asking some very fundamental questions about the Fed’s actions this week (e.g. who authorized the Fed to do this – do these people have carte blanche to take any emergency action now ???), we have to seriously ask why the Fed would put itself on the line this way. In effect, they have placed themselves on tap to drip feed liquidity directly into the CDS market. That is … if you can call injections of $85 billion at a time a “drip feed”.Here’s my specualtion. In spite of the utter seriousness of a failure at AIG, and a possible breakup in the CDS markets, I don’t think the Fed would have taken such an action unless vital interests were threatened at home. In other words, the Fed was scared by what they saw as a direct threat to US markets. But what exactly would that be? Well, it’s no secret that JP Morgan is holding an enormous piece of the entire derivatives transactions that have been negotiated and handled by Wall St. So could it be that the Fed made an assessment, and realized that the counterparty risk to JPM was real? If so, then we can possibly understand why they took such an enormous step. The death of JPM would mean the death of the US financial system at this stage. That is something the Fed will never allow to happen – at least while they are still breathing.Just some speculation.PeteCA

2centsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:07 am

randy,GE has not been much of a producer of real assets for a long time. Sure, they are still a “big” prodducer relative to some other producers, but realistically that side of the business has been greatly overshadowed by the financial services side (financing, credit, leasing, equity stakes, asset management, etc.). Going forward the production divisions will mostly find that they have little room to drive pricing while the financial side is going to be siphoning off money to cover previous obligations.It sounds as if you have a lot wrapped up in GE, maybe it’s a good time to examine the uppside vs the downside given what is occurring.

KenSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:08 am

Any wiser bloger here this question is for you…please help me understand how the FRB injects $ into the banking system? How does it work and why isn’t this additional liquidity fixing the credit markets? What are the banks doing with the added cash? Are they just sitting on it?Please see story at:Central banks pump up the dollarsAs banks horde cash and lending dries up, Fed and 6 others announce joint action to pump $180 billion into system.Chris Isidore, CNNMoney.com senior writerSeptember 18, 2008: 10:34 AM EDThttp://money.cnn.com/2008/09/18/news/economy/central_banks/index.htm?cnn=yesKind Regards, Ken

MASeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:12 am

ha. nope. I’m a Polock. (4th/5th generation American) Actually, I’m a mutt. Polish, Irish, and German (in that order of blood%) that makes me a P.I.G. …with lipstick.Miss America

2centsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:13 am

Yes, but the Dubai’s (as in both) have had incredible cash flowing in. Cuba … well let’s just say that’s not a big problem there.Yes, I like the way you think. Yes, we would be better off with a friendly government at the tip of Fla. No, it’s not likely to flourish in any timeframe necessary to mutually help the US crisis.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:17 am

Water said:

Being “TREATED” to slower reduction of buying power’?The Middle Class was SOLD OUT by NAFTA, Globalization, inflation, government and corporate malfeasance and corruption.The dotcom crash could have long since played out AND the middle class would still be ahead. Instead of turning to credit to maintain a normal standard of living, the middle class could have benefited from their OWN increase in worker productivity instead of it being STOLEN by corporations in collusion with the government.The lesson has already been learned, but what kind of defeatest additude is “prepare ourselves so that it doesn’t occur so badly next time”? You are either going to be a victim or not.

Good stuff. In some cases we were sold out, but mainly we are subject to the ages-old phenomenon of capital flight.NAFTA. local version of globalization. See next.Globalization. Capital flight to the best return on capital. Chinese worker will work all day for $2. Avg American industrial worker gets about $15-20 hour. (8 * $20)/$2 = 80. We’d need to be 80x more productive to stay even. That’s the force we’re working against. It’s a tidal wave, and we’re currently fighting it with the wooden-laths and garbage-can lids of rhetoric and indignation. Remember, the U.S. was built to a substantial degree by capital flight from Europe from mid-1600′s onward. Inevitable, age-old force. Only one remedy.Inflation…has not been a big factor. Some things are rising in price because of our compromised buying power, some things (houses) are falling in price. Lately the trend has been more deflationary than inflationary.Corporate malfeasance, corruption Yup. GM, Enron, MCI/Ebbers, and so on. Kick their be-hind when you get the chance.In the big picture, the malfeasance is minor. The tectonic forces are the relative returns on capital, causing capital fight toward cheap labor.There is going to be a leveling of standards of living. The only question is “what’s the level of living standards at equilibrium?”So, yes, we did get cushioned from the hammer-blow of capital outflow by taking on debt. I stand by the word “treated”. It’s like buying a vacation using your credit card.About that “defeatism.” I regret to report that the average citizen of the world, American or not, is no match for the elites that run this world of ours. The difference in raw capability is huge. That gulf is not going to be closed overnight.Therefore, we are going to get fooled again. Just, hopefully, not quite so badly as we did over the past ten years.Sorry. I really am, but one of the fundamental rules of warfare, project management, and farming is “scale the job correctly, so you’re at least tempted to use the right tools”.Lastly – love that fightin’ spirit. In the end, that’s what’s going to tell the tale. Either we’re willing to do the work to get what we want, or we’ll get a lot less than we have today.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:27 am

KenCentral banks normally inject money into the system through the reserve banking system. Normally it’s as simple as regulating the buying and selling of US treasuries. The banks exchange these assets with the Central Bank and receive funds, with the understanding that they must pay borrowed money back within a certain timeframe (they pay the money back with interest). So the Central Bank can regulate these transactions by the amount of interest it charges.But these are not normal times. Under dire circumstances, the Fed has been accepting all kinds of collateral in exchange for injections of liquidity. The Fed has taken onto their books all sorts of securitires tied to bad mortgages – and we can really expect that the value of this mortgage junk will deteriorate badly in the future. Hence, the losses are really being transferred to the US Govt – and ultimately to the US taxpayer. But the Fed has even gone as far as recently accepting stocks in exchange for liquidity lately … an enormous departure for all previous accepted norms for the Central Bank.Injections of liquidity are NOT doing the job because the potential financial losses from the mortgage market are enormous. If you calculate the actual losses (in constant US dollars, adjusted for inflation), the loss in the US mortgage market now totals roughly $6 trillion dollars!!! Those huge losses have not been transferred to Wall St because many companies holding the assets tied to mortgages are refusing to value their assets at realistic prices (AIG is a classic example – they have been under no constraints to value their mortgage assets at fair market prices because they are an insurance company). So a large part of these losses have not been transferred into the system yet. And as you know – home prices in America are still falling. Foreclosures are still mounting, and so are deliquencies on many other kinds of debt – all adding to greater future losses.So what we have is a solvency problem – the financial system is essentially bankrupt. The Central Banks are trying to buy enough time for people to solve this problem. It’s far from clear that the attempts will work, and if they don’t then the USA will fall into major deflation – a huge collapse in asset prices. Also known as a Great Depression.PeteCA

2centsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:27 am

MA … I’m same P.I.G. except 2nd generation. My lipstick must be newer (or older depending on perspective). Anyhow, my grandparent’s and great grandparent’s seemingly detached tales of old Europe vs. new US and Great Depression have finally found a root in my mind. It’s amazing how I can recall much of what was said. I didn’t even think I was listening back then!Best of luck to you in all this!

artichokeSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:38 am

Does a Morgan Stanley or a Goldman Sachs assess the strength of start-up entrepreneurs and fund their operations? I have not observed that in the industry. Perhaps you mean Angel funds and Private Equity. Or maybe Commercial Banks that lend money to businesses.

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:44 am

If Morgan goes away, Goldman will stand alone and anti-trust concerns cannot touch them. Without the crisis, such a situation would never have been allowed to happen. Now it could, and it could be permanent, and all done before the new administration takes office!With support from natural allies in industry and government who are former employees, Goldman can survive and bestride the world.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:49 am

@ptm: “I’ll let John Williams address this issue…’Messrs Bernanke and Paulson tacitly have confirmed that they will create whatever money they have to create in order to prevent a systemic collapse.’”Without John Williams how would the people protect themselves economically against the manufactured numbers the government and banking cartel are using to distort economic perception?But, there is a greater risk to Americans than the “systemic” failure of a flawed financial plan drafted by self-dealing central planners at the Fed. And that is collapse of her once vibrant economy. In order for America’s economy to revive, the present financial “system” must be allowed to die a natural death. It is a financial scheme backed by fraud, extortion and paper assets, benefiting the few at the expense of the many, sucking the lifeblood out of this great land of plenty. We must save the economy.This economy is our sustenance — value based on the work and production, distribution and consumption of millions of hardworking individuals. To exist it must operate by voluntary exchange in a free market –not in a market deregulated to accommodate special laws legalizing plunder for the bankers and corporatists: try to start up a business against a monopoly and see just how “deregulated” the framework really is. America’s economy cannot breathe and grow and flourish under the iron-fist control and greed and deprivation caused by a centralized banking cartel that creates disequilibrium and legal plunder.How does one define legal plunder? Says Frederic Bastiat: “Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime…“Then abolish this law without delay… If such a law…is not abolished immediately, it will spread, multiply, and develop into a system…”That “system” already has occurred. The Federal Reserve System, owned by private bankers that print all US currency under the Fed’s name, is enriching the few at the expense of everyone else; it has made “plunder universal under the pretense of organizing it.”It is not too late to abolish the Fed: but to do so Americans must first abolish Congress and find one that will do the job.

hazletonSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:52 am

@Miss AmericaYes, we need”new thinking” like how to be kind and honest and helpful to our fellow man. That will be revolutionary thinking and will occur after all hell breaks loose.

TASeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:55 am

PeteCA,I always enjoy your posts, and this is no exception. Two questions; 1. What exactly do you mean “…losses are really being transferred to the US Govt – and ultimately to the US taxpayer.”? Please diagram how the losses will be transferred to the US taxpayer as well as their likely effect. 2. What exactly do you mean “…buy enough time for people to solve this problem”? Who is attempting to quantify let alone solve the problem(s)? What problems have been identified, and what solutions are being considered?

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:01 am

Agreed. The leadership will fight it tooth and nail. How do we get it done?PS I’m not sure Obama is better than McCain in this regard, I’m open to evidence either way — if that choice even matters.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:04 am

actually I wasn’t referring to Mr Bush personally, although he is the main “character” in the current administration. What I did say is that this crisis was purposedly created by some folks somewhere in the upper echelons of the current administration. Hardly Mr. Bush. He is just a front face of the administration, sort of like a Muppet.In any case what is happening is not an event anyway, but a process. As such it was not purposely “created” by some group of persons but merely purposely started and/or fueled by such.The point with the good timing is that the crisis is used as an excuse for changes that could not be carried out otherwise and that are carried out by people who could be out of the office after the election. So if changes to be carried out according to a plan, they have to be carried out while the people with the plan have the power to carry them out.In this case the changes are such that they give more power to the U.S. government. Something that would be useful e.g. in a civil war type of a scenario.

mammonSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:05 am

I think you are on the right track! The largest american derivative holders are:JPMORGANCITIGROUPBANK OF AMERICAWACHOVIAWELLS FARGOThese banks will be shored up!The JPMORGAN derivative position dwarfs the others!

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:15 am

another similarity between the German society during the Nazi era and U.S. nowadays is that patriotism or loyalty to “motherland” is universally accepted as a positive moral value. It is thus freely available for the leaders to tap. Who knows how this will be used in the coming moments…

2centsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:17 am

Why inflation still matters, depression is a heart beat away, and the future is going to show up with an empty gas tank.The FED is supposedly handling the various swap facilities by offsetting these injections with comparable withdrawals elsewhere. The problem is, this causes the FED to invest in the past (old money at old leverage). The money they withdrew was evidently eventually available to be used by someone to invest in the future (old money applied at new lower leverage).In short, the FED is sucking the future dry. If they win we get huge inflation via the short term facilities and bailouts. If they loose we get very great depression via all the enormous deleveraging. Either way, the future’s tank will be empty!The argument favoring the FED’s actions is basically that we can’t handle/survive a massive deconstruction today. The argument against the FED’s action is basically that we can’t handle/survive a massive deconstruction tomorrow either. So collectively our society is petrified of what might happen today, afraid of where we could end up tomorrow, and absolutely blind to any future.Of course, there are those who would argue that because we are so confident in our future we can slipstream it now and make life a little easier today.

mammonSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:20 am

Congress must retool the Federal Reserve Act ASAP!The only way to make this happen is to bring this to light.The only problem is that anybody with political aspirationscannot utter these words! Only Ron Paul and some ProgressiveDemocrats have stuck their neck out!It is up to the intellectuals to remove the leashes the acquisitorshave placed around their necks. There must be an intellectualrevolution of thought. The intellectuals must copy the professor andwrite viscerally, not cover their butts! I really admire some of thegreat minds that write here. I am just a student of your discussions!It is time to bring forth solutions with conviction!!!

randySeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:20 am

Thanks for the comments. I have nothing wrapped up in GE. I’m just very surprised that someone thinks GE could go belly up. They might be a good target to buy some LEAP puts on. I’ve made some $$ on others this way. How can I learn what their level 3 assets are?

Free TibetSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:27 am

Globalization. Capital flight to the best return on capital.An over-simplified definition. The expectation was that there would be 2 sides to that trade. By outsourcing work to more efficient producers in the developing world, the hope was that the resultant savings would be invested to open new markets for products that the developed world would continue to produce. There were tons of examples where that should have worked.But it didn’t. Mercantilist developing world economies recycled those (forced) savings to the developed world where they have been squandered on consumptive, rather than productive, uses.The question now is whether the entire concept of globalization is so discredited that it can no longer be pursued.

ptmSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:34 am

Excellent thought. Just as Miss America called for reforms, let’s all join in the chorus.1)Remove the banking secrecy laws and replace them with TRANSPARANCY.2)Restore the Glass-Stegal Act and enforce REGULATIONS especially in the creation of credit.3)Return to the gold standard or require Congress to VOTE on manipulating the money supply.(MA also discusses dropping the loan principle to get mortgage holders above water and expanding trade with Cuba, but I think these are more peripheral issues.)

Christian MarxSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:35 am

The probability that an Obama administration would even consider bailing out the consumer is less than the probability that the moon will crash into the earth next week; whereas the probability that a McCain administration would consider bailing out the consumer is less than the probability that the moon will crash into the earth in the next minute.

FFSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:37 am

As Jim Bunning (Rep. KY) said: “The Federal Reserve is the problem” (to paraphrase). The Fed should be shut down. Sadly, however, 9 out of 10 Americans probably think the Fed is part of the US government.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:37 am

Sympathy for the Devil(Lyrics by WilliamBanzai7)Please allow me to introduce myselfIm a man of wealth and tasteIve been around for a long, long yearStole many a mans nest egg and faithAnd I was round when LivermoreHad his moment of doubt and painMade damn sure that MilkenWashed his hands and sealed his fatePleased to meet youHope you guess my nameBut whats puzzling youIs the nature of my gameI stuck around AIGWhen I saw it was a time for a changeFired the CEO and his SVPsWhile Bernanke screamed in vainI owned a bankWas best friends with HankWhen the markets ragedAnd the cold Pizzas stankPleased to meet youHope you guess my name, oh yeahAh, whats puzzling youIs the nature of my game, oh yeahI watched with gleeWhile your investment banks bleedFought for ten decadesFor the junk paper they madeI shouted out,Who killed LTCM and the SEC?When after allIt was you and meLet me please introduce myselfIm a man of wealth and tasteAnd I laid traps for bond tradersWho get fired before they reach MumbaiPleased to meet youHope you guessed my name, oh yeahBut whats puzzling youIs the nature of my game, oh yeah, get down, babyPleased to meet youHope you guessed my name, oh yeahBut whats confusing youIs just the nature of my gameJust as every banker is a criminalAnd all the investors saintsAs heads is tailsJust call me Merrill, Bear, Drexel, Lehman, Kidder & Chasecause Im in need of some restraintSo if you meet meHave some courtesyHave some sympathy, and some tasteUse all your well-learned risk controlsOr Ill lay your trading book to waste, um yeahPleased to meet youHope you guessed my name, um yeahBut whats puzzling youIs the nature of my game, um mean it, get downWoo, whoOh yeah, get on downOh yeahOh yeah!Tell me baby, whats my name

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:47 am

markets are keeling over again…we need another injection of $200 billion to hold the levees for the afternoon timeframe…

OuterBeltwaySeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:49 am

FreeTibet – there are only a few niches left that China can’t occupy (perform internally). Automation and information flow have and will continue to erode those. Think Japan. What high-value-add manufactures do we ship to Japan? Planes, some wafer fab stuff. What else? What took Japan 30 years to do China will accomplish in 10. China would have to be asleep at the wheel to permit serious external dependencies…and they are not sleeping.So the horse is out of the barn, for the US. China’s got our factories, and more efficient ones than we have here (the newest stuff). We just blew our capital to fund the next edition (of industrial infrastructure) on consumption and oil wars. The big story of the fin meltdown is that our capital-raising capacity has been really reduced.Whatever recovery there’s going to be from this compromised circumstance is going to be based on superior adaptation capacity, and some new ideas. It’s now a contest of the cultures, not of the factory.That, of course, leads right into the great debate about command .vs. “market” economies. China is really working hard on getting that balance right – they’re experimenting widely, and on a big scale, e.g. whole cities set up to manufacture TVs (product-focus industrial town, ala Pullman).Does anyone have first-hand insight on some of the social-industrial experimentation that’s being conducted in China? For example, a poster here a while ago told a story about capital formation via e-bay-like auctioning of stock (this was pre-crash of their stock market). What are their success stories we can draw inspiration from?

One-Eyed FionaSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:11 pm

@Outerbeltway, Mandarin, PhilTOuterbeltway, kudos for lighting the fuse to making this one of the best “debates” on this site in recent memory. And I very much agree with your statement that the econ meltdown is “a symptom of the rest of the forces at work (population, energy, information, environment), not the fundamental cause.” The wise comments you provoked from Mandarin and PhilT also rock.Folks with a “find and hang the bastards” reaction will be impatient and dismissive of your style of argument, however, and I can understand why (and even sympathize). Equally unhelpful are those who cite some impassioned screed ( = best selling econ/bus book) of the day and use blithely it to make sense of recent events.But I think your post has really touched on the *foundational questions* at stake, and now the discussion can turn to the really important questions facing us for the long term. IMO the questions haven’t changed very much over all these centuries. altho every society has different answers at different points in their history. (E.g., in Greek society in 5th-century Athens we find Aristotle saying that man is essentially a ‘political animal’, but he seems to have neglected ‘economics’ (from Greek ‘rules of the house’ or ‘housekeeping’) since he could always eat before his slaves did. Similarly during the economic dislocations (good and bad) in the 18th & 19th centuries we find that ‘political economy’ becomes the hot topic at these historically transitional times (Adam Smith who taught it as ‘moral philosophy’, Marx, even Henry George).My main point here is that the worth and significance of your original post is demonstrated by all the amazing and novel responses it created these past 2 days.Salutations to all men and women of good faith and open minds,One-Eyed Fiona

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:13 pm

A New Role for the Fed: Investor of Last Resort (NYTimes) cutdown version…The central bank has also transformed itself almost overnight into the Fed Inc. by essentially taking over American International Group after already taking on hundreds of billions of dollars in mortgage securities to help ailing financial institutions.Instead of just setting monetary policy in its Ivory Tower-like setting, the Fed now must wear several hats — that of insurance conglomerate, investment banker and even hedge fund manager…The Fed has often been described as the nation’s lender of last resort — the one institution that would lend money when everything else had failed. But by acquiring almost 80 percent of A.I.G. in exchange for lending it $85 billion, and holding $29 billion in securities once owned by Bear Stearns, the Fed is now becoming the investor of last resort as well…The Fed’s balance sheet, moreover, is being stretched in ways that seemed unimaginable one year ago. As recently as last summer, the central bank’s entire vault of reserves — about $800 billion at the time — was in Treasury securities.*By last week, the Fed’s holdings of unencumbered Treasuries had dwindled to just over $300 billion. Much of the rest of its assets were in the form of loans to banks and investment banks, which had pledged riskier securities as collateral.In a sign of how short the Fed’s available reserves had become, the Treasury Department sold tens of billions of dollars of special “supplementary” Treasury bills on Wednesday to provide the Fed with extra cash. The Treasury sold $40 billion of the new securities on Wednesday morning and will sell $60 billion more on Thursday. More money-raising is sure to follow…Indeed, the role of the Fed chairman, Ben S. Bernanke, almost seemed to unnerve a leading House Democrat.“He can make any loan he wants under any terms to any entity or individual in America that he thinks is economically justified,” said Representative Barney Frank, Democrat of Massachusetts and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.“I asked the chairman if he had $85 billion to bestow in this way. He said ‘I have $800 billion.’”“No one in a democracy unelected should have $800 billion to dispense as he sees fit,” Mr. Frank said.Fed officials contend that they have ample resources to handle all their new obligations. Unlike a company or a household, the Fed can raise as much cash as it wants by printing money and buying up Treasuries and other securities at will…The Fed has disclosed little about the securities it is holding, but the pool is believed to include billions of dollars worth of securities backed by troubled subprime mortgages…Beyond its foray into corporate management with A.I.G., the Federal Reserve is becoming an increasingly important force in the market for risky debt securities.Analysts say they believe that Lehman Brothers, the Wall Street firm that filed for bankruptcy on Monday, is borrowing tens of billions of dollars through the Fed’s six-month-old emergency loan program for big investment banks…[Lou] Crandall, of Wrightson ICAP, predicted that Lehman and other investment banks might have already tapped it for $50 billion since last weekend.If they did, Fed officials will be holding collateral that is even riskier than what they already have.http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/18/business/18fed.html*Note: We must take the Fed’s word on its “assets” as Congress has no access to its “books” since its inception. Guest

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:20 pm

the system is broken..i lov to watch bankers pissing in their pants..but “well contain” it in their pampers.. hahaHAAAAmrskeptical

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

hahahAHAAAAHAHAAAAAA…not according to plan and ppl lose their minds.. reduced to apes with rather flexible thumbs..mrskeptical

Dave PerrySeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:25 pm

Tell me about it. I see that the news media lies so much, For one thing our economy is not that bad. I just had 3 recruiters call me in less then 1 week. I am in the IT field. Also I went to a Chilis restaurant last week, and on a week day. The place was so crowded. If we are in such a big economic crisis, that the news media says we are in, this would not be happening. We need to get the word out, like I am on my website. Stop socialism from being elected. Also we cannot blame Bush for the Housing Bubble anymore than we can Blame Clinton for the Stock Market Bubble. So tell the media to shut the #### up.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

the media is confusing market selloff with economic recession – but reality is yes recession setting in globally not just in the US as well…and spread of the financial and credit crisis just now beginning to spread into the general economy (i.e. from the financial economy into the real economy – in the past it has been the other way around but this time it is the other way around)

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:04 pm

Fox News: Dem VP candidate declares that paying higher taxes ‘to help get America out of the rut’ is patriotic thing to doWhy don’t all the politicians, regulators and wall street thieves who got us into this mess, pay 100% of their future earnings until we are out of this mess!! FU!

SoftwarengineerSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:05 pm

WHEN THE DUST SETTLES, NO ONE IS IMMUNEThe Dems blame the Reps for no regulations and the Reps blame the Dems for wanting it that way. So who’s to blame?Most of America did nothing when our country had uncontrolled [mostly unskilled] population growth since 1990 and then lent money to much of this “in-sourced” growth for home purchases…..now we’re reaping the harvest of our brainless denial.We worry about “outsourcing” of America’s Middle Class jobs…..”In-sourcing” and replacing American Middle Class [lunchbox Joe] jobs in America, no one one seems to talk about or worry about.I believe “in-sourcing” is ten times worse to America’s banking systems and economy than “outsourcing” ever was. We’re mostly all to blame too.Think about it.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

problem in US is that, other than agriculture, there is virtually no one making anything anymore – the fact is that 10x as many lawyers graduate as do engineers, the idea is for the lawyers to go after the little wealth that the engineers create…how can an economy be based on financial machinations of paper derivatives and legal cases?

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:36 pm

Hmm, wasn’t Schumacher’s “Small Is Beautiful” and all the “going green” rhetoric right after the gas rationing of 1974 and the election of Reagan in 1980??

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:52 pm

ECONOMIC REPORTHousehold debt grows at slowest pace in 56 yearsNet worth of Americans falls at 1.9% annual rate in second quarter

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 1:52 pm

MSM Jim Kramer asks “Are Financial Terrorists Attacking America?” There’s your justification for Fed/Treasury intervention. Paulson is working with James Bond to save America from Middle Eastern Sovereign Wealth Fund short sellers. Heroes & villians…just the story line we need to get the public to fall in line with whatever actions the Fed decides are needed.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:05 pm

WOW! VOLATILITY CENTRAL! DOW UP 150 POINTS in 32 seconds, now at 240! Any wonder as we enter the witching hour PPT slams the futures buying to the upside!

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:08 pm

no way since adjustable mortgage resets still high until around 2011 timeframe…check any chart on this, say from Credit Suisse for example…

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:10 pm

this also implies that for every quarter until 2011/2012 timeframe, there will be continous stream of additional writedowns on mark-to-market per FAS 157…

mammonSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

I had an inkling of this yesterday when Wayne Angell said the “FED HAS AN INFINITE BALANCESHEET” on Fast Money. This is the END GAME! The crescendo to this moment was a set up!Darth Paulson and Sith Lords are going to turn us all into TAX SLAVES! I am dying to seethe Professor’s piece on this!! The Fed will start to accumulate the RTC like assets and thenwill be Transferred to the Congressional RTC entity. They have to get Congress to set upa law. I cannot see this being set up on any extra-constitutional vehicle!THEY HAVE SET UP A GREAT THEATER PRODUCTION FOR THE END GAME OF EXTORSION! TAKE OUR DEBT AND LIKE IT OR WE CRASH THE SYSTEM! THE SITH LORDS ARE SHOWING THEIR END GAME!!

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:42 pm

Will RTC-type solution take care of everything? Recession,Credit crisis? Are we heading for DOW 20000 by November?Your comments?

AshuSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:50 pm

Stock market will rallyGov. will hold itself accountable for all the losses…….remember 6 months back Bush shouting that there wouldn;t be no gov. bailouts………here it is.Partial short term solution to the solvency crisis.MS, GS will survive on their own.

AshuSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

and we already discussed the -ve aspects of this approach (in the previous blogs)………….but thr are no other options.Cheers!

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 2:52 pm

Next thing that will happen is barring any transaction which isnt positive…lets give all the kids trophies or nobody gets to play, so much for capitalism.

PhilTSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:09 pm

Well put …I think that we all know that this situation is complex, severe and getting worse, and that would make the present an excellent time to de-lever denial and start injecting integrity into the system.What I neglected to articulate above is simply this … (directed to those in charge) gives us a rationale for what you are doing. It doesn’t have to be a thesis, but have a little humility and tell it like you see it, whether or not others (critics) agree. If your time is such that you cannot take a break, then appoint an intelligent spokesperson who is directly familiar with the decision process that can can deliver the rationale to those of us that you are placing the burden on now and for the future.Even, if it turns out that the (re-)actions taken will have also failed or even made for a worse situation, at least the valiant effort that T. Roosevelt is talking about above, can be acknowledged.I do appreciate your reply, Sir, and look forward to additional enlightenment.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 3:10 pm

I don’t understand, why set up a new institution, isn’t it easier to just change the name of the Federal Reserve Bank to Resolution Trust Company??

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

interesting. But the Bush administration surely is acting like there is a serious situation that warrants the nationalization of Fannie and Freddy and the acquisition of 79.9% of AIG stock. So if things are not really that bad, what is it then? A government grab for more authority over the economy?Bush administration has been increasing the power the government has over U.S. citizens since 9-11 (right to retain people indefinitely, domestic spying, etc). Now they are also taking power over the economical system.

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

I really honestly HOPE this is only news manipulation to pop up the markets.If however the RTC crap is true, then get your passports and head to the closest consulate to your home and ask for a long-stay visa.LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

And you’ll get a free dose of rage every day from Karl’s pungent tickers.(And don’t worry, you’ll learn fast to ignore his BOLD-ALL-CAPITAL words)

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

AFA-interestingly enough, stocks had a 3 std dev move down at the lows this morning and it is funny how on 3 std dev days, we get market-friendly news. Lots of shorts got pummeled here today. You can’t tell me Hank ain’t watching stocks on an hourly basis. We will see if the rally is sold….

GloomySeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

RTCThis ia not a plan but an idea born of deperation which will prove to be an excercise in theoretical alchemy. The bad debt must go somewhere:1. Stay with the banks-financial meltdown, then armageddon2. Go to the government-hyperinflation, then armageddonLOL

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 3:31 pm

Right, a good half of the 300 points Treasury rumors either did not materialize (a la Super-SIV) or were utter failures (a la HOPE).

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:32 pm

Who the hell is going to protect the average US taxpayer in all of this? When did the US mantra change to “of the people, for the wall street elite, at the expense of the people, arranged by your US congress person”?

mammonSeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:34 pm

Now Schumer is now stating a different plan on CNBC! He is talking about the governmentbuying stock in the banks and letting them dispose of assets. There seems to be an assumption that the banks adjust the terms for the mortgagees and also that the Bankruptcy Judges can Cram down the balances in Foreclosures in Bankruptcy. He calls it RFC!Gasparino might think this is all the same, but I beg to differ!CNBC should be able to be more exact on their reporting!!RTC TYPE SOLUTION MAY NOT BE RTC LIKE!!!!!

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 3:36 pm

Tomorrow open is option expiration. The bank owned government pulled one or more rabbits out of Uncle Sam hat every single time. Everybody was expecting a salve. Actually it was an unusually pathetically weak one this time.My guess is that the original plan was to spare the Mac & Mae nationalization for the OpEx week, but they were run over by the events.

GloomySeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:50 pm

This idea will solve nothing:1.”This new governmental body would be able to buy up the troubled paper at fair market values”-Guess what the fair market value of this stuff is:Maybe 10 cents on the dollar. If sold at that price, the banks will need to stop their charade and admit insolvency. Or the government can buy it at an unrealistic price and take on massive debt. I laugh because the whole idea is just silly.

GloomySeptember 18th, 2008 at 3:53 pm

No one will protect us. You need to protect yourself. Buy gold, put options, whatever. But stop expecting anyone to help you.

MASeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

Nope… This is where the bad debt will evaporate.Negative equity “assets”, that were bought with leveraged cash will wind up here, parallel to the way a negative equity house, that was bought with no money down.It will be the equivilent of “jingle mail” for bad debt.The new home of debt destruction and evapor-flation. A gov’t SIV.Miss America

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:04 pm

Credit Market Pressure video added by RGE today.Professor does not believe fed will print, no inflation.Many other so far credible folks, Williams, Schiff, Ron Paul and others think they will. My understanding is that our dept and unfunded liabilities are so great, increased taxes will not solve the problem, and no one other than Ron Paul would make the cuts necessary.If dollar goes down considerably, as I am prepared for, we will have higher commodity prices which to me are inflation. Perhaps the professor does not think this will happen due to recoupling.Helicopter Ben said he would print in his famous speech ” Deflation: Making Sure “It” Doesn’t Happen here”.Do others here believe the printing presses will not be cranked up and these debts monetized?Bernanke speech for those who don’t have it.http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021121/default.htmTrying to get some clarity, thanks.hlowe

WAWAWASeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

UNITED STATES – WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Treasury Department and Federal Reserve declined to comment Thursday on any discussions Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson may have had with lawmakers about a Resolution Trust Corporation-style fix for a financial market crisis.“We’re not going to comment on rumors,” Treasury spokeswoman Jennifer Zuccarelli said.http://www.forbes.com/reuters/feeds/reuters/2008/09/18/2008-09-18T194334Z_01_WBT009743_RTRIDST_0_FINANCIAL-TREASURY-RTC-URGENT.htmlHard to know what is going on.

MASeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:06 pm

Nope… they bought it with leverage in the first place. It will just come off there books….and since some are running negative in value to what is owed… they just hand it over.Miss America

randySeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:08 pm

@ GloomyYou are right. Buy gold for the long term. when it hits $2500 or so I’ll sell it all! Also find some stocks you think will tank and buy the puts.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:09 pm

@ wawawawait sounds to me like another bad idea… from a guy who ran a company that is the best in the world when it comes to greed and manipulation.When will someone realize, these “same old tricks” are born from a brokers mentality?Miss America

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:10 pm

SOMEONE PLEASE ANSWER THIS. IF THE FED WILL NOT GET ALL THIS MONEY BACK, THEN WHO HAS LOST IT ?I AM JUST AN AVERAGE WORKER WHO IS TRYING TO UNDERSTAND ALL OF THIS BUT CAN NOT GET CONCLUSIONS.I HAVE READ MANY DETAILS BUT STILL NO CONCLUTIONS OF WHAT IS HAPPENING, WHAT IT MEANS AND HOW BAD WILL IT GET

GLOOMYSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:12 pm

MORE RTCThe RTC concept plays on the idea that the problem with these MBS is one of liquidity, i.e.- there aren’t enough buyers. The real problems are: 1)they are so complex they are almost impossible to value 2)given the fact that the real estate market will fall another 20%, any value given to them today will likely be too high 3)they just aren’t worth much (see the Merill Lynch sale).

GloomySeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:17 pm

These things actually exist. When they are disposed of to the RTC it will have to be at a stated price. What will that price be?

randySeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:17 pm

The answer you are looking for is not a one liner that you can read, understand, and then take action to protect yourself. I strongly suggest you start reading daily on this blog along with many others like chrismartenson.com (a very good one). watch his videos and they will give you a pretty good idea of what is happening and what to do.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:24 pm

Why fear the dollar going down. Its Foolish, Guys/Gals either the world’s fiat currency system works or it does not. There is nowhere to hide as finincially the world is closer to 1 than 0 in correlation.. Gold is useless since, if it comes to that, it will be the law of the jungle at work, in which case guns/land/etc are what U will need.

OuterBeltwaySeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:38 pm

Some quick info on the first RTC (1991)RTC-1 backgroundAlso, there’s a big difference between the RTC-1 and the RTC-2. In the first case, the RTC was set up to dispose of assets from Federally insured banks (S&Ls). The gov’t was already on the hook at the point the banks went bust.In RTC-2, the fed isn’t on the hook (yet). It can give the asset a “haircut” before it takes title to it. The gov’t can set a floor on the national RE market by edict.The gov’t can control what its exposure to subsequent loss is (by giving big up-front haircut), and has a great deal of leverage at this point in time to do exactly that.MA- in the case of the neg-equity deal, that’s not the gov’ts problem (from my p.o.v). Gov’t does FMV based on phys characteristics of the home (neighborhood, bedrooms, etc.) and that’s the number it pays (less anticipated remaining fall in value to floor), using Case-Shiller, for example.Whoever issued/holds that mortgage takes the hit prior to gov’t taking title.Why isn’t that how it would work?

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:50 pm

It is hard to imagine whatever government is going to do with RTC-2 will be in the best interests of american public in mind.It seems to me more like passing off toxic debts owed by these irresponsible and reckless businesses on to the government, who in turn will pass it onto the taxpayers in the form of treasury debt. Only the word scam comes to my mind.

K in TXSeptember 18th, 2008 at 4:55 pm

Fellow average worker I’ve been reading this blog for over a year now and chasing down and reading most of the links provided by participants. I’ve also been trying to spread the word, at least in my small sphere, but it is a very complicated thing to explain. One thing leads to another and there are many inter-related plot lines.The best brief answer I can come up with for you is that it maybe bad, or very, very bad. Consistent advice on preparation has been to hold precious metals as a store of value, cash dollars in case of deflation, and/or a stable foreign currency (Swiss Marks) to defend against dollar collapse. At home hoard what you need regularly just in case. If things smooth over and don’t get all that bad then you just don’t have to buy as much stuff for awhile. If things get really bad then you will have supplies to use for you and yours, or to trade with others for what you need. And here is a good 2+ hour course that might help you out: http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse

mammonSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:00 pm

Josh Rosner on CNBC had a proposal with a quaint name. He proposed that theBanking Institutions show under their “Kimono” the level 3 assets that theyhave been hiding in exchange for government money to allow them to string out thedisposition. The problem is that everybody is highly insolvent under theKimono. Personally I think that Paulson showed the Congressional delegation his version ofthe abyss of reality, and now will ask them to stick the taxpayer or be blamedfor sending the country down the abyss! The supposed conference they are havingat 7 pm eastern, 4 pm pacific will be dragged out and we will have some kind ofpseudo-clarity after the market closes on Friday after quadruple witching. Thecongressional types better have independent advisors or the banks will get theirSocialist Total Bailout

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:05 pm

@ hlowe,Thanks for linking that Barnanke’s speech again. Each time I read it, I stand in amazement about how foolish and shortsighted his economic thinking is where all is summarized in two words: LIQUIDITY INFUSION.According to Barnanke, on how to prevent Deflation:- drive short term FF rates as close to 0 as possible- bring down the long-term rates, by:* “commit[ing] to holding the overnight rate at zero for some specified period”* “announcing explicit ceilings for yields on longer-maturity Treasury debt … by committing to make unlimited purchases of securities up to two years from maturity at prices consistent with the targeted yields”* “attempt[ing] to cap yields of Treasury securities at still longer maturities, say three to six years”* “yet another option would be for the Fed to use its existing authority to operate in the markets for agency debt”- “consider attempting to influence directly the yields on privately issued securities”- “offer fixed-term loans to banks at low or zero interest, with a wide range of private assets (including, among others, corporate bonds, commercial paper, bank loans, and mortgages) deemed eligible as collateral”- “buy foreign government debt, as well as domestic government debt”- “expand the scale of its asset purchases or, possibly, expand the menu of assets that it buys.”Nowhere in Mr. Bernanke’s speech is question of risk premia as part of yield curve construction. Nowhere in his speech is question of solvency or trust. He, however, base his recommendations on a flawed definition of deflation (a slowdown in aggregate demand and spending) which is clearly not the trigger of the current deflationary tsunami. He also confuses increase in nominal spending (as a result of increase of nominal prices due to the debasement of the dollar) and increase in spending.“But the U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation…“Of course, the U.S. government is not going to print money and distribute it willy-nilly (although as we will see later, there are practical policies that approximate this behavior)…“Thus, as I have stressed already, prevention of deflation remains preferable to having to cure it. If we do fall into deflation, however, we can take comfort that the logic of the printing press example must assert itself, and sufficient injections of money will ultimately always reverse a deflation.”LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:06 pm

MASo, if “Eventually, in round robin fashion, you will see the off balance sheet debt being paired off against other counterparty debt to eliminate overall debt. Debt will evaporate. It has already started. It is the only answer for a debt that can’t be paid. Sorta like Chapter 11, it’s a restructuring that’s going on.”Is all ok now? Is this dept not going to build onto the deficit? I can count on the disappearing man in the box????Still waiting for you to articulate the complete cycle.hlowe

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:14 pm

Senator Charles Schumer has proposed to pump $$ into these reckless financial entities.Who is he trying to help?..Taxpayers or his CEO buddies?

PeterJBSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:15 pm

We human beings excel at everything; there are no limits except those imposed on us by our own emotional selection of “leadership”.We need sound structure upon which to build our organizations; in order to fly.Each individual is a unique function; there is no need to concern ourselves about where to apply ourselves, however, we must build sound structure with at least a 50 to 100 years of vision and adjust continually.Structure; forward vision; adjustment (regulation sans ‘let’s do lunch’) – all in Physics.Actually the solution is simply; very simply.The reality will, I fear, be very different in the short term with the bureaucrat, politician et al, shutting down the human spirit as the Banks have closed down lending; reduction of risk(theirs’).People need to unemotionally get into the governments’ face – daily – and take a responsible attitude towards the actions of “leadership”.We could start by protecting those components of the “REAL” economy, as opposed to Wall Street and certain individuals and groups (those that lobby intimately and personally).Ho hum

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:17 pm

Don’t we already have an RTC, also known under the name of the Federal Reserves?I mean, com’on. The Fed had been accepting all sort of toxic waste as collateral (now expanded to equities, what will happen when the value of the equity is 0?). I was convinced it had still some change to pay for the AIG loan, but I was mistaken. And now they are pouring hundreds of billions of dollar on this belly dancer (who is hiding a knife between her clothes waiting for the right moment to stab and stub the taxpayer).

ptmSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:30 pm

Excellent analysis AfA! Thank you. In the past I focused on the oxymoron “positive inflation,” but you have shown many more dimensions of misunderstanding in this “student of the depression”!

MASHIACH BEN CHANASeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:49 pm

Ten Russian warships have docked at Syrian portDEBKAfile Exclusive ReportSeptember 18, 2008, 11:08 PM (GMT+02:00)Israeli military and naval commanders were taken by surprise by Rear Adm. Andrei Baranov’s disclosure that 10 Russian warships are already anchored at the Syrian port of Tartus, DEBKAfile’s military sources report.Moscow and Damascus have worked fast to put in place the agreement reached in Moscow on Sept. 12 by Russian navy commander, Adm. Vladimir Wysotsky and Syrian naval commander Gen. Taleb al-Barri to provide the Russian fleet with a long-term base at Syrian ports. Israel was not aware that this many vessels were involved in the deal.What most worries Israeli military leaders is an earlier announcement by Adm. Wysotsky that Russia’s Mediterranean assets would subjected to its Black Sea fleet command, thereby placing Russia’s warships near Israel’s shores at the service of Moscow’s contest against the US and NATO in the Caucasian. It is feared that Israel will be dragged into another cold war.Rear Adm. Baranov disclosed that the warships in Tartus had brought engineering crews to widen and dredge the harbor to accommodate additional, fleet vessels. The crews were also working on expanding Latakia, another Syrian port, possibly for aircraft carriers or guided missile cruisers.The Russians are making no secret of their intention of using their naval presence in Syrian ports as a deterrent to a possible Israeli air strike against Syria.

Little SaverSeptember 18th, 2008 at 5:54 pm

Paulson Announces Plan for An RTC/HOLC-Type Institution to Clear the Bad Debt OverhangSep 18, 2008So, at last, Paulson has his super-SIV.L’état, c’est moi et mes amis.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 6:19 pm

As long as we are talking statistics…While there is clearly no “international economic Jewish conspiracy,” it is absolutely true that 40-50% of America’s billionaires are ethnically Jewish even though they are only about 2-3% of America’s population. See: http://zsidozas.wordpress.com/2008/05/12/the-deleterious-influence-of-america%E2%80%99s-jewish-billionaires/Additionally, the vast majority of the oligarchs/plutocrats who bled Russia dry during the post-Soviet era were ethnic Jews as well: this has been fully and empirically proven; if you don’t believe me, read WORLD ON FIRE by Amy Chua.So it is understandable that some people are highly suspicious of such an ultra-wealthy and influential ethnic minority and are looking for a scapegoat during these very difficult economic times. But again, there is no “Jewish conspiracy,” only the indisputable fact that Jews are disproportionately wealthy and involved in finance and economics in many countries.And before someone calls me anti-Semitic for staing facts, let it be known than I am ethnically Jewish.

Mother of GodSeptember 18th, 2008 at 6:38 pm

The human species is either going to murder the diabolically stoopid and fundamentally unjust idea to allow unlimited personal fortunesorits members will succumb to the result of having the next and the next and the next wealthpower giants.(Write that down, poor suffering humanity)Say, does anyone know when the Global Atomic Harvest Of Humans Knowing What Aint So is scheduled to begin?Do I have time for a cocktail, first, Yiz think?

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:18 pm

while were enjoying the stock market magic show,here’s an update on the real economy…..and they blame it on a hurricane!!!!hahahhaahahathe writer is craving for attention, guess its hard to sell your story in this environmentok back to our magic showhttp://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080918/economy.htmlAPJobless claims rise due to Hurricane GustavThursday September 18, 1:27 pm ETBy Christopher S. Rugaber, AP Business WriterJobless claims increase unexpectedly to 455,000 due to Hurricane Gustav’s impactWASHINGTON (AP) — New applications for unemployment benefits rose unexpectedly last week, largely due to Hurricane Gustav, the government said Thursday, adding further strain to the economy.The Labor Department reported that initial jobless claims rose to a seasonally adjusted 455,000, up 10,000 from the prior week. Wall Street economists had expected claims to fall slightly to 440,000.Layoffs can worsen the nation’s economic woes as newly unemployed workers and those that fear for their jobs cut back on their spending and fall behind on their debts. Consumer spending accounts for about two-thirds of the economy.Jim Chessen, chief economist for the American Bankers Association, said Thursday that banks have seen consumers increasingly falling behind on credit card balances, auto loans, and other credit.”The key to consumers’ ability to meet their obligations is whether they have a job,” Chessen said.Claims have now topped 400,000 for nine straight weeks, a level that economists consider a sign of a struggling economy. A year ago, the figure stood at about 320,000.

iNnOsInZSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:20 pm

Can someone please explain the following (or atleast partial):1) How will the RTC be funded (new treasury debt or current cash available (aka taxpayers money))?2) Will they be taking only mortgage related loans?3) What about CDS and non-performing Corporate loans? Would taking corporate loans solve the CDS problem somewhat (depending on RTC haircuts)?4) Who’s going to bailout the mother of all bailouts (aka FED/Treasury)? Will we be a subsidiary of BRIC, GCC or Europe? Or are we going to let it ride and print money till we are forced by other nations to file for chapter 11 or 7? Sell off each State to some nation to raise capital?All roads seem to be leading to HELL, oh i mean Rome (the destructed one that is) =(Any constructive answer would be greatly appreciated.

WAWAWASeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:34 pm

Is not FEDs and Treasury operating like hedge funds?They are issueing short term debts to cover long term debts.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:36 pm

more on the REAL economyFrom record levels right back down to levels of 56 years ago.IF and that is a big if, they somehow (i give it 10% probability of success)managed to turn around the situation in the stock market, imagine their face seeing another set of S**T LOLWASHINGTON (MarketWatch) – The debt burden of U.S. households grew at the slowest pace in at least 56 years during the second quarter and American families saw their net worth fall for the third straight quarter, the Federal Reserve reported Thursday. Household debts increased at a 1.4% annual pace in the quarter, the Fed said in its quarterly flow of funds report. That’s the slowest growth since at least 1952, when the data were first collected. Borrowing for real estate mortgages grew at a 0.8% annual rate in the second quarter, also the lowest since the records began. Household net worth fell by $438 billion, or 1.9% annualized, to $55.99 trillion, the Fed said.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 7:40 pm

Miss Americaleaving fractional reserve banking aside, every dollar borrowed is a dollar lent. What is debt relief to someone is credit destruction (perceived as wealth destruction) to someone else. Every dollar not paid back by the debtor is a dollar less in the balance of a creditor.Someone has to foot the bill for the massive balance of debt that will not be paid back from the “jingle mail” crowd. Creditor who are hurting are:* first line is credit market speculators of all kinds (lenders, IBs, hedge funds, CDS underwriters, GSEs, etc)* second line is greedy bystanders who have lent to the speculators for a few points of yield (ARS investors, foreign Central Banks, money market funds, mutual funds, pension funds, corporate “cash” balances, etc)* third line is the taxpayer that is force to bail out everybody else.First line is leveraged by the money lent from the second line. In the mythical free-market world when the thing hit the fan the first line goes down in flames and the second line gets a sizable wealth hair-cut. $2tn of defaulted debt means $2tn in losses to be shared at some level.What’s happening in the USSRA is simply that the government is moving as many losses as politically possible from the second line to the taxpayer (all bailout are really second line creditor bailout) and they are even trying to save bits and pieces of the first line.I fail to see any evaporflation.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:40 pm

ops the linkhttp://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/household-debt-grows-slowest-pace-56/story.aspx?guid={46BB896B-F890-4554-9A9F-D835A2F3E41F}&dist=hplatest

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 7:41 pm

Nouriel has already nailed it. The US government is now the biggest hedge fund of them all.

HubbsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

right you are Guest, IMHO. Ass long as there is order, gold will trade as a commodity. If law of the jungle, then it really boils down to who has guns and can defend their land etc. Gold will have no more functionality than the useless paper fiat is it supposed to replace.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 8:02 pm

SEC: Ban All Short Selling (via The Big Picture)SEC intends to temporarily ban short selling, but it’s not clear if the commission has approved the move. Cox is briefing congressional leaders. Separately, the government is seeking congressional authority to buy distressed assets.Barry comment seems very lucid to me:This is nothing short of a total panic by people who have no clue what they are doing. And to think, I mocked Russia for being a nation run by market commies.This is the ultimate bailout attempt, which will have repercussions far far beyond our imaginations:1) We suffer a loss of Market Integrity; The US is now a Banana Republic2) Blatant market manipulation: this is nothing more than an attempt to force markets higher;3) 60 days prior to a presidential election? This is a none-too-subtle attempt to influence the elections — especially coming on top of the Fannie/Freddie bailout;4) The coming pop will create a huge air pocket, ultimately leading to us crashing much lower;5) Expect a huge increase in volatility — upwards first, then down;We Are A Nation of Morons, led by complete Idiots, making us complicit in our own self destruction.Bold mine.http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/09/sec-ban-all-sho.htmlNow I think we can safely say TPTB are in panic and the markets will crash sooner rather than later. Good luck to you all.

PhilTSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

Also to the point … did you catch Joe Mason’s article in this site?

…The problem is that we really don’t know why we are bailing out all these institutions. In fact, this week we chose to bail out some but not bail out others that are nearly identical. While bailouts might engender moral hazard, and the lack thereof a widespread retreat from risk, random bailouts confuse markets so that investors have no idea what to do. Such policy will certainly draw out the economic effects of the crisis for far longer than would otherwise be the case…

Entire article => Crisis Policy is Redrawing the Boundaries of our Financial System – and not Necessarily in Productive Ways

PhilTSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:23 pm

Very confusing …I thought that the LEH bankruptcy would lead to PRICE DISCOVERY of toxic assets that would in turn allow for whatever resolution is necessary in the marketplace without further intervention.Is RTC-2 intending to upstage the LEH bankruptcy court case in discovering/mandating PRICE?

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:28 pm

RTC,Ban Short selling, this is all (nonsense) smokescreensand rumours about WAMU’s bank run..WAMU is going down BABY!!!i know someone here is happy to hear the newsmaybe the WANT WAMU to die!!!

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 18th, 2008 at 8:37 pm

@AfAgood stuff.Bernanke is a buffoon. It’s really hard to believe, but that paper is so full of flaws that it frightening. Bernanke has no clue.Up until now he didn’t use a single one of the academic policies he described, save for cutting rates. And now fe has the once in a century opportunity to demonstrate himself as totally and utterly clueless about the main subject of his life-long studies.

Comrade AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:40 pm

Good analytical presentation Comrade Alessandro, plain and simple.However, I think that the idea behind evaporfaltion was one of a active engagement to find a solution not one that will be forced by the natural flow of events. But then, I am not her father.LET’S BURN SOME CDS!

artichokeSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:44 pm

Easy question: the amount of money can change, and the Fed can change it most effectively by lending it to the Treasury, member banks, or an ever increasing number of other folks apparently. One thing going on here is that new ways of creating money have been invented to add to the old ones.So the Fed budget doesn’t have to balance. But in the long run everyone else’s does, possibly through a bailout or gift. If you’re not “connected” the Fed won’t give you those. Wonder if Schumer will.Hard question: How bad will it get? I dunno. In the ’30s a financial crisis and pervasive indebtedness led to a crisis in the general economy. The general problem then (imho) was that we had finished building railroads and had too much productive capacity. Now we have a financial crisis, pervasive indebtedness and an opposite problem in the general economy: too little productive capacity. We’ll see what happens …

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:48 pm

@MAI applaud the creativity, but the details (I’d state that they were actually simple fundamentals) make this a dead end.I’ll repeat the problem: The US is broke; Cubans are poor.Cubans would NOT be able to make significant purchases of autos such that it would be meaningful (it wouldn’t be a market that would be very on-going).And the US would NOT be able to afford energy from the Cubans.You could argue that there could be a swap (cars for energy), but I don’t see this as lasting too long: there’s only so many cars that Cuba could purchase; and besides, don’t they run on fossil fuels (which are in decline)?The US needs to be a net exporter in order to get out from under its debts. This would require MORE energy consumption, of which energy imports account for roughly 40% of the current trade deficit- read: the equation cannot be righted.

PhilTSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:49 pm

I hope that this entry is part of a chapter in a book your are writing.One question for now please, which goes to my complete lack of understanding of the the bailout mentality … regarding your statement, “Those that cannot transfer value will follow the path of Lehman Brother’s…”What value was transferred in the Bear Stearns situation and how was Lehman different in that regard?Looking forward to your reply.

K in TXSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

If short selling is banned wouldn’t that be a clear signal to the financially savvy to get out of the market? I’ve been of the opinion that it is automatic investments like 401Ks that have created what real stability we have in the markets. What will TPTB do if the brighter working stiffs say to hell with the penalties and start pulling out of their retirement plans en masse?I tried to get my mom to get out of the market a few months ago. She said “well, I call my broker.” Big surprise, she told her it’s just a little volatility and everything is fine.

AnonymousSeptember 18th, 2008 at 8:50 pm

Do you think Reed,Pelosi et al. will do what Paulson-Bernanke wants them to do? To help McCain win the election??..This crisis is helping Obama according to the polls.What are the chances this will not materialize before the elections?

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:00 pm

“The chief cause of problems is solutions.”- Eric SevareidThere is no plan other than to be more in tune with nature.BTW – I have “free” time to read and post here. I do do other activist things, so it’s not like I sit back and carp.

artichokeSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

You’ve made a good analysis. Nevertheless, Bernanke may be more right than you give him credit for:1. Is not the current deflation caused by a slowdown of aggregate demand and spending? Demand is measured vs. a given price, i.e. he means a shift in the demand curve. Sure people still want to go shopping til they’re dropping, but they are too far in debt to do so now. Indeed aggregated demand at given prices has fallen, and deflation results in some categories.2. In the current situation, do you think that even if Bernanke printed like mad, we would not get inflation? I bet he could print enough to get the price of houses going up within a month or two. The result would be too much inflation in other categories, which might be called hyper-inflation, and our trading partners would complain. But that doesn’t contradict the thesis: if Bernanke printed enough, prices _would_ go up.

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:20 pm

I replied to this further up in the blog but will repeat myself here…I applaud you for your creativity, but when one carries this thought forward it hits the wall.The topic started off with opening up trade in order to benefit the US manufacturing sector- US auto sales. I pointed out that the Cubans aren’t exactly financially rich, that that is why they aren’t buying new cars now: I also stated that if they were really looking to blow money on newer fossil-fuel burners that they could do better by purchasing them from Korea.Then the topic shifted to Cuba selling the US power. Novel idea but… the US is broke!There could be an argument that the US could trade cars for power, but this would appear to be a pretty short-lived exchange: how many cars could Cuba absorb? When they were done with this trade (saturation) the US would be hooked on more foreign energy and will have lost some of its export revenue- net: increased trade deficits for US.Somewhere the US has to come out AHEAD in order to destroy its debt. And that debt is so huge that it’ll take a massive amount of increases in exports to overcome. And such ramping up of exports will only occur with increased energy use. Energy costs currently add up to about 40% – 45% of the US trade deficit. The ONLY way out is for the US citizens to work for cheaper than other workers in the world and for it to consume its own natural resources for such production (this over local consumption).It’s an equation that can’t be righted without the US turning into a third-world country…“The chief cause of problems is solutions.”- Eric Sevareid

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:28 pm

And soon NYC will fall back into the financial chasm…It was a cycle, propped up by 9/11 (major event). But the law of averages will bring it all down again.

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:42 pm

China would have to be asleep at the wheel to permit serious external dependencies…and they are not sleeping.THE biggie is energy, and while they are not falling asleep at the wheel (they’re aggressively locking in contracts), they ARE, nonetheless, heavily dependent upon external sources.

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:47 pm

Technically the Fed isn’t the government, in which case it’ll be the Fed passing along the bill to the US government (Treasury). But then again, I suppose that the mechanics of it all, the devaluation of the dollar as a result of the Fed’s actions that are, in effect, causing the US government increased debt. Am I close?

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:53 pm

The “vibrant economy” was the product of cheap energy.We cannot pretend that we could have anything like we’ve had. All that we can now hope for is a sustainable economy, one that respects our environment, one that allows us to be somewhat comfortable (in the food, shelter, water equation).

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:55 pm

Thanks Alessandro and Afa for attempting to get clarification on this subject. The two of you are great at articulating that which I have difficulty with.hlowe

MarkSeptember 18th, 2008 at 9:58 pm

Am I missing something here? Isn’t it the Treasury who is responsible for the printing? The Fed cannot print money.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:17 pm

Nancy Pelosi left the meeting with an expectation of a plan from the White House within a couple of days..The most powerful member of Congress waiting for a solution from THIS President! Lord help us all, from these useless reprobates and nitwits.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:45 pm

talk about unintended consequenceshttp://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/money-market-funds-see-record/story.aspx?guid={E322BE61-F830-4B58-94D8-C207E14714D3}FUNDWATCHMoney funds see record $90 billion one-day dropPutnam closes fund; Columbia, Dreyfus act to save $1 a share net asset valueBy Sam Mamudi, MarketWatchLast update: 1:51 p.m. EDT Sept. 18, 2008NEW YORK (MarketWatch) — Money market funds saw nearly $90 billion of net investor cash pulled out on Wednesday, among the largest single-day drops in history.Figures from iMoneyNet show that assets dropped to $3.35 trillion from $3.44 trillion, a fall of $89.2 billion.Among the funds hit hardest by the redemptions was the $12.3 billion Putnam Prime Money Market Fund and needed support from their parent companies to maintain their $1 a share net asset value.Figures from iMoneyNet show that $130 billion left prime institutional money market funds Wednesday. This follows $61 billion of redemptions on Monday and $37.2 billion of redemptions on Tuesday.”This is the largest week of outflows that we’ve ever had,” said Connie Bugbee, managing editor of iMoneyNet. “It’s not even close.” She added that some of the outflows, perhaps as much as $20 billion may be due to companies moving money around because Monday was quarterly corporate tax day.

GuestSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

US your failure is completewelcome to the dark sideBad Debt Plan May Cost Up to Half a Trillion DollarsTreasury Secretary Hank Paulson briefed Congressional leaders on plans to address the “illiquid assets” on U.S. financial institutions’ balance sheets, possibly including the creation of a government facility to take on financial firms’ bad debts.CNBC.comHenry Paulson——————————————————————————–The proposal to create a massive facility to buy mortgage-backed securities could cost as much as a half-trillion-dollars and would involve the purchase of both private-label and government-guaranteed mortgages, according to an administration official.The plan would have two parts. The largest part would be the purchase of private-label (those underwritten by Wall Street) mortgages by some as-yet unnamed vehicle. Financing would occur through the sale of treasuries, the official said. That part of the plan would require congressional approval. The idea is to hold the securities to maturity. The average mortgage has a life of about 7 years.A second part of the plan would involve the purchase by Treasury of additional government-backed (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) under a plan it announced several weeks ago to rescue the two government-sponsored entities. Back then, it said it would purchase $5 billion initially. The idea is to ramp up those purchases more quickly. It does not require approval by Congress.The administration is contemplating hiring a private investment manager to run the mortgage vehicle. Yet to be worked out with Congress are the amount of mortgage securities the government would buy and from whom the government would accept them.The price to be set on those purchases and the process for setting it was also unknown.

AshuSeptember 18th, 2008 at 10:52 pm

The market will cheat the Treasury and dump all irreparable toxic waste on its balance sheet, perhaps something every1 eventually wanted.

Average JaneSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:01 pm

Oh, dear, this is just getting terrifying here on Main Street, O People of the Blog. On what passes for “news” on my local television station tonight the anchors dutifully delivered a script on the answer to the “problems” on Wall Street: it’s all because those gosh-darned mortgage bankers loaned money to those gosh-darned people that could not pay it back (racist overtones visible) whilst collecting numerous usurious fees. If we could just get “those” subprime people cleared out of the system, why, home prices will come roaring back and all will be well. (On my honor, Joe Average, your 1920s-vintage 700 square-foot two-bedroom one-bath really IS worth $400,000 in the Midwestern market. Trust me. Do not sell for anything less.) It’s the Housing Market, y’all. Caused all them thar durned financial problems. (Aaaacck!)I am just sick at heart. What simplistic claptrap. And the hell of it is, folks on Main Street may just buy it because after all, the alternative is too horrifying to contemplate. As for the proposed new-and-improved RTC the Sequel, I just read a very good blurb on calculatedrisk.com that reminded me of what was actually happening back in those days. The S&Ls that were taken over had already failed and the RTC was simply selling their assets. Not so today. The implications of this latest band-aid are staggering for the taxpayer. All of these machinations are just astonishing.Whew. We live in interesting times, yes? How much longer can the sleeping sheep sleep? Or stay paralyzed? Inquiring mind wants to know.

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:09 pm

Why you think the DOW shoot up over 600 points today?Houston, we’ve got a problemBoston, we’ve got a serious problemPaulson, we’ve got ourselves in a ^(&$#)@&&@) problem.LET’S BURN SOME CDS … and some other stuff

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:27 pm

good points, to be brief:1.not yet, this mess was started by high debt burden reaching its physical extension boundaries. The debt ponzi-scam is based on an infinite and perpetual expansion or it is doomed to fail. The high demand/spending for the last few years is not the standard but rather the abnormally speculative state from which we are poised to fall/callapse to revert to the “mean” – a thing that we barely start to notice – whereas the credit crisis is reaching its apogee (unwinding of credit and deleveraging)2.Well we would, and that is one of the main reason I am worried about his reasoning. What much difference there will be if the house price is now $200,000 compared to an annual wage of $50,000 and when the house will cost $1,000,000 and your wage is $200,000?”if Bernanke printed enough, prices would go up” Yes, so would that solve any problem??????Forget about prices (in dollar terms) and think about them in terms of arbitrage pricing, comparative pricing or, if you wish, in terms of PPP (applied internally) across all classes of consumer products, commodities, wages, assets (productive and unproductive) to gauge whether any action taken by the FED would make things better or worse (from a consumer/saver/investor point of view)

AfASeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:30 pm

Repost@ artichoke”1. Is not the current deflation caused by a slowdown of aggregate demand and spending? Demand is measured vs. a given price, i.e. he means a shift in the demand curve. Sure people still want to go shopping til they’re dropping, but they are too far in debt to do so now. Indeed aggregated demand at given prices has fallen, and deflation results in some categories.2. In the current situation, do you think that even if Bernanke printed like mad, we would not get inflation? I bet he could print enough to get the price of houses going up within a month or two. The result would be too much inflation in other categories, which might be called hyper-inflation, and our trading partners would complain. But that doesn’t contradict the thesis: if Bernanke printed enough, prices _would_ go up.”good points, to be brief:1.not yet, this mess was started by high debt burden reaching its physical extension boundaries. The debt ponzi-scam is based on an infinite and perpetual expansion or it is doomed to fail. The high demand/spending for the last few years is not the standard but rather the abnormally speculative state from which we are poised to fall/callapse to revert to the “mean” – a thing that we barely start to notice – whereas the credit crisis is reaching its apogee (unwinding of credit and deleveraging)2.Well we would, and that is one of the main reason I am worried about his reasoning. What much difference there will be if the house price is now $200,000 compared to an annual wage of $50,000 and when the house will cost $1,000,000 and your wage is $200,000?”if Bernanke printed enough, prices would go up” Yes, so would that solve any problem??????Forget about prices (in dollar terms) and think about them in terms of arbitrage pricing, comparative pricing or, if you wish, in terms of PPP (applied internally) across all classes of consumer products, commodities, wages, assets (productive and unproductive) to gauge whether any action taken by the FED would make things better or worse (from a consumer/saver/investor point of view)

Wolf in the WildsSeptember 18th, 2008 at 11:33 pm

There are a couple of things I would like to comment on today. Firstly, the action by the FSA with respect to a total ban on short selling smells of panic and to some extent it destroys any belief in free markets in the Anglo-Saxon world. The LSE is probably one of the largest and most cosmopolitan stock market in the world. In one move, it just became Kuala Lumpur. It is a sad day when free markets are destroyed. And today is a very sad day. If the government and the regulators are not willing to face up to the facts that the Anglo Saxon financial system is insolvent, then there is no way any of these problems can be solved, be it through banning of short covering, or providing overnight liquidity. Shorts are established because investors and traders believe a company or bank is not healthy. If the banks had no problems, they would not be attacked. Instead of trying to make the banks healthy again, the authorities decide to prevent an attack. That will not work. The banks will still DIE. When it looks like a turd, smells like a turd, feels like a turd, in all likelihood it is a turd. What is on their balance sheet has nothing to do with the share price. The share price is just a reflection of what markets perceive the net asset value to be. It is the balance sheet that will kill the banks. Stopping shorts is not going to stop that. And it just degrades the market further. Its almost like de-evolution.On RTC.Don’t we just love Paulson and Benny? Talking about the RTC now when this should have been thought off months ago. And no details. And what off the definition of what a “distressd” asset should be? And what transfer price? How big? US$200b? US$300b? US$2trn? And how the heck is it going to fund it? Are the tax payers going to stand for it if no banks suffer? Look at RTC1. See the impact of equity holders and debt holders. Be afraid.We are at the stage where we have liquidation of assets into a market that does not have enough money to buy these assets. It is that simple. I have been oft told that there is a lot of liquidity out there. I rebuff this with one question. What is the credit multiplier these days? What was it in 2006? I would not be surprised to see the multiplier near historical lows. That simply means there is a lot less money supply out there now than when all these assets were trading at par. What happens when there is too little money chasing after too many assets? Assets value have to decline. And until that sinks into the regulators brains and when they realise that SOMEONE has to take the hit for the excess of the last 5yrs, nothing will be solved. If they continue to try to maintain markets as they were, they will fail and fail dramatically. As this situation continues to slide further down the ugly slope of liquidation, it will gather speed and get bigger. And stopping it is going to get increasingly more difficult. We are finally seeing the beginnings of deleverage and the market does not like the taste of it.PS This is the worst market condition I have ever witnessed since 1992. I seriously think we are in for more pain to the end of the year as the deleveraging gathers pace. It is going to be “fun” days

artichokeSeptember 19th, 2008 at 12:15 am

1. I think we are agreeing here. (Do you agree now?) Things bubbled up, and the bubble levels of consumption could not be sustained by consumers. That lack-of-sustaining is a decrease in their demand function.2. Indeed Bernanke is not running the presses at full speed (or anywhere close to it) because of the other problems it would create. Bernanke’s paper never said that it was good economic policy or would solve the important problems. As I remember, it just said that printing like crazy and/or some other policies would reverse deflation as measured in (by definition) nominal terms.

artichokeSeptember 19th, 2008 at 12:22 am

I answered slightly longer above but very briefly:1. The collapse from bubble-level demand function is a slowdown of aggregate demand and spending.2. Forgetting about nominal prices means you are now considering a question different from what Bernanke addressed in his paper.

artichokeSeptember 19th, 2008 at 12:30 am

Agree the ban on short-selling in UK and probably in US is disgusting. It just shows how awful the situation is. The right comparison is the 1930′s, not the 1990′s or even 1970′s, and they are clearly hoping to do better than was done then and avoid a bad depression. And help their friends Goldman and Morgan along the way too, of course. In the 1930′s I would not be surprised if Goldman and Morgan got some help too. (And not just the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation!)I don’t see a reason to doubt Bernanke’s paper. If he wanted to he could print enough that we would have inflation in every category, but then there would be hyper-inflation in some categories. Also that would not fix all insolvencies, though it would fix some (where assets are more rate-dependent than liabilities.)

AfASeptember 19th, 2008 at 12:32 am

I just want to add that the current credit crisis is Exibit A of the, sometimes, hollow distinction between Deflation and Recession. Professor is implicitly making a distinction between the two (when he talks about worse credit crisis since GD but with a recession lasting 18 months). A distinction that, apparently, Bernanke did not see in his speech (which I hope was very ad-hoc and contextual and do not reflect his deepest beliefs and academic and economic philosophy).Bernanke was afraid of the second (recession = reduction in demand/spending) but describing tools to fight the second one (deflation = a generalized unwinding of credit resulting in depressed selling and collapsing prices). Eventually, the first would lead to the second.@ Alessandro, I believe that Bernanke started implementing many of the ideas he expressed in his speach. In addition to driving FF rates down to minimum (more to come?) he also tried to use the Fed windows to extend loan swaps taking agencies and other private securities (MBS) as collateral. He then added equities to the acceptable collateral (equities for God’s sake: that is the lowest security in the financial food chain which means that any other security would be acceptable) He extended loans directly to private corporations (AIG). He also expanded the “scale and menu of securities purchased” from the private sector. He is buying billions of dollars worth of new treasuries… All that is left probably is trying to influence the long-term end of the yield curve, to which I say: Good luck/

HazletonSeptember 19th, 2008 at 12:46 am

I find this blog and other financial blogs to be extremely fascinating, especially since this world is so different from my day job as a medical professional. All the negative news from the past year has been interesting to read. It was a welcome diversion after a hard day at work.Today’s news, however, has finally put me into a depression. It is so sad to see all of us taxpayers – especially my children’s generation – have less financial hope and a lower standard of living.

GuestSeptember 19th, 2008 at 1:11 am

Telegraph (the UK newspaper) calls short selling morally dubious. The next thing is it will probably be called unpatriotic, although on the other side of the ocean.Hedge funds clipped by short-selling banhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?MLC=/money/city_news&xml=/money/2008/09/19/cchedgefunds119.xml&CMP=ILC-mostviewedbox

As short-selling is banned to protect Britain’s banks, Gordon Rayner names the men who have made millions from the financial crisisAs 70,000 employees of HBOS wonder which of them will still have jobs this time next month, they will no doubt be looking for someone to blame for the extinction of their once great employer…. ……a select band of private fund managers who have made their money through the morally dubious practice of short- selling which, despite involving trading something you don’t own, is perfectly legal…. …Dodgy as this may sound, short- selling has been going on for hundreds of years, but the obliteration of HBOS – which has been squarely blamed on short- selling – forced the Financial Services Authority to take drastic action last night by banning short- selling of financial stocks.

By the way, as can be read above AIG is not the only company going belly-up. The British HBOS is another.

GuestSeptember 19th, 2008 at 1:22 am

Fed and Treasury Offer to Work With Congress on Bailout Plan

…While details remain to be worked out, the plan is likely to authorize the government to buy distressed mortgages at deep discounts from banks and other institutions.
(source: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/business/19fed.html?ref=us)And if they got the mess sorted out, a few years would go by and the “creative” U.S. investors (as branded so by that report Nouriel mentioned earlier) would come up with some other way to make cash and run the economy into the ground.

GuestSeptember 19th, 2008 at 1:31 am

he’s a good dude… either that or he bought the wrong putsU.S. Should Stop Bailouts, Let Firms Fail, Says CLSA’s WoodBy Chua Kong HoSept. 19 (Bloomberg) — The U.S. government should allow firms to fail to allow markets to find a “natural bottom,” said CLSA’s Christopher Wood.“If the U.S. authorities continue to indulge in bailouts, they risk not only fanning moral hazard, but also contaminating the credit and good standing of America,” said Wood in his “Greed & Fear” newsletter dated yesterday.The former journalist, the top-ranked Asian strategist in Institutional Investor’s yearly poll, predicted this week that global credit losses will rise by a further $1 trillion. The crisis has caused more than $500 billion of writedowns and losses at financial companies worldwide.Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke pledged to work through the weekend on measures to ease the turmoil that prompted government takeovers this month of American International Group Inc. and mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.U.S. stocks surged the most in six years yesterday on prospects that the government will formulate plans to shore up financial markets.“The more that markets are allowed to correct, the more likely they are to find a natural bottom from whence a dramatic recovery can ensure,” Wood’s wrote in his newsletter.

Little SaverSeptember 19th, 2008 at 2:52 am

Citigroup Inc., JPMorgan, Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and Lehman Brothers alone had more than $500 billion of so-called Level 3 assets as of June 30, according to data in a Sept. 15 report from New York-based bond research firm CreditSights Inc. The holders of these assets say their values can only be determined through internal models because of illiquid markets.So, with the new super-SIV, they can go to the treasury with the following claim: my internal model says that these assets are worth xxx dollars, please give me xxx dollars, because the markets are wrong.Markets are free, but only if they are not wrong. Government decision.Do you hear that, US citizens? You are free until government decides for you that you are wrong. Internal models rule the state, not you.

GuestSeptember 19th, 2008 at 3:40 am

aaaahhh i thought RTC-2.0 will save the USCanada-EU trade proposal rivals scope of NAFTAPlan to lift barriers for goods and labour to be discussed at summit after electionDOUG SAUNDERSFrom Thursday’s Globe and MailE-mail Doug Saunders | Read Bio | Latest ColumnsSeptember 18, 2008 at 2:00 AM EDTLONDON — Canadian and European officials say they plan to begin negotiating a massive agreement to integrate Canada’s economy with the 27 nations of the European Union, with preliminary talks to be launched at an Oct. 17 summit in Montreal three days after the federal election.Trade Minister Michael Fortier and his staff have been engaged for the past two months with EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson and the representatives of European governments in an effort to begin what a senior EU official involved in the talks described in an interview yesterday as “deep economic integration negotiations.”If successful, Canada would be the first developed nation to have open trade relations with the EU, which has completely open borders between its members but imposes steep trade and investment barriers on outsiders.The proposed pact would far exceed the scope of older agreements such as NAFTA by encompassing not only unrestricted trade in goods, services and investment and the removal of tariffs, but also the free movement of skilled people and an open market in government services and procurement – which would require that Canadian governments allow European companies to bid as equals on government contracts for both goods and services and end the favouring of local or national providers of public-sector services…

PeterJBSeptember 19th, 2008 at 3:48 am

That which has now been entered is a trend; not a good trend but a trend that just may give life to the largest institutional monster that civilization has ever seen:The new Catholic (etymological definition) Order of civilization.Previous reference please see the birth of the Church of Rome based upon the removal of the Catholic Church in Egypt and its new location in ancient Rome. Later to be granted its own statehood and to become the first fascist organization in the entire World.The new relationships are eager membership by ECB, UK, Canada, Japan et al. More will eagerly follow as incompetence and stupid politicians urged on by the feral bureaucracy of insolent and lazy morons, seek to extend their irrelevance towards the holy grail of the FedRes. The model will be the same; almost identical. The effect the same; read your history.As I have stated the US Congress and all that hangs off it are irrelevant. The Office of the US President is also irrelevant as are the offices of all those Nations that permit their Central Banks to join the fellowship of the Catholic Order of the FedRes.One must ask: where is the engine of growth? Where is the engine of Production? That the Constitutional Republic of the USA is dead is no longer in question and nor is the matter of the free-market system; they are dead and gone: All will now be directed by the dogma of the FedRes:Long Live the Pope! Long Live Pope Benjamen!No growth;No productivity;Full nation-state subservience;Freedom lost;Mediocrity; the spirit be dead.Welcome 1984.Now the FedRes fights all investors cum speculators of the free-market and all profits will be given to the faithful (less commission). The new Catholic Order will absorb all the United Nations which will include the IMF, World Bank and Bank of International Settlements, ETC! In one gulp. John Bolton will be delighted.The bifurcation is almost complete.Profits for the holy faithful are guaranteed as are losses for the sinners!I must say, not even I thought I would see such insanity arise from and within the USA and never did I suspect that the final submission would be so easily accomplished. Are we all mad!I think so.Ho hum

Little SaverSeptember 19th, 2008 at 3:54 am

I hope they don’t do the same with The US. In that case, their banks would be toast. Can’t compete with government sponsored crooks.

GuestSeptember 19th, 2008 at 4:07 am

Capitalisme / Democracy has evolved into what Orwell visioned it to be!!and youre right, the whole world is giving their nod of approvals, fearing for their own economy they assumed there is no other option but to bow down and give the kiss of lordship to?

Little SaverSeptember 19th, 2008 at 4:09 am

History repeats itself.Galileo was imprisoned for proving that the Universe did not revolve around Rome.Shorts are prosecuted for proving that the Universe doesn’t revolve around Wall Street. Pure blasphemy, how can they even think about it.

Little SaverSeptember 19th, 2008 at 4:31 am

Ann Woolner at Bloomberg is outraged too:Sue Them, Jail Them, Make Them Pay for Meltdownhttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&sid=amhY7f0W2igY&refer=homeWon’t help much beyond ventilating some frustration, which is quite understandable these days.

AnonymousSeptember 19th, 2008 at 4:46 am

Crisis averted ! Looks like all those people who said the u.s. economy is on its way to collapse were wrong. Time to get back to our lives. No world wide depression, No world war 3.Just a slow down that may last one more year.Everything will be even better if Obama wins.The worst is over

Free TibetSeptember 19th, 2008 at 4:46 am

Want to know why govt. bailouts involve only 79.9% takes? Here it is. Hat-tip Yves Smith at calculated riskhttp://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2008/09/why-have-the-go.htmlSection 163 of the Internal Revenue Code generally provides that interest paid on debt is tax-deductible for federal income tax. But there’s an exception. If the interest is paid on a loan from an entity that controls 80% or more of the voting power and value of a corporations’ total shares, then the interest is not tax-deductible.

GuestSeptember 19th, 2008 at 4:57 am

i had this feeling for quite some time nowUS = socialist?? i dont think soUS = Fascist?? no, even at one time the people loved HitlerNew World Order??the rule by which you lived are determined by usyour state of existence whether rich or poor is determined by uswe determine whether youre entitled to a gain or losssuch is our power even government of the world will bow to us

Wolf in the WildsSeptember 19th, 2008 at 5:18 am

What is the result of FSA and SEC’s banning of shorting in financial stocks? Ironically, they could well be confirming the fact that these financial institutions are insolvent. Why would I say so? The stock price of a financial institution has no relevance to it UNLESS IT NEEDS CAPITAL. It is prohibitive to short a bank share if the bank continues to pay dividends, issue bonus shares, increasing its own capital through profitability. That is a no win trade. A healthy bank won’t be worried about its share price. Its own perfomance will make shorts suffer. On the other hand, if a bank is truly insolvent, it cannot afford its share price to drop because that is the capital of last resort: dilution to raise capital. In trying to shore up stock prices of financial institutions, the authorities have tacitly told all investors that the banks are insolvent and would need more capital. So if you are long bank shares, I suggest you think very carefully about what the FSA and the SEC is telling you. And decide what to do with your shares.

Free TibetSeptember 19th, 2008 at 5:51 am

Turn the TV off, Average Jane. Sell it. You’ll feel better. I don’t own one. Got tired of watching Fair & Balanced shake their fists at one another. MSM is dumber than dubya. It’s a distraction. Bread & circus you know.

Free TibetSeptember 19th, 2008 at 5:53 am

“equities for God’s sake: that is the lowest security in the financial food chain which means that any other security would be acceptable”Good point.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 19th, 2008 at 6:14 am

“Crisis averted.”For how long? two weeks? into October? the traditional month of stock market crashes (psychology matters)?Keep an eye on short term T-bill rates. 0,5% at yesterday close doesn’t spell “The worst is over” to me.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 19th, 2008 at 6:41 am

TREASURY SETS TEMPORARY GUARANTY PROGRAM FOR U.S. MONEY-MARKET FUNDSA few more billions of dollars moved from second line to taxpayer.Looks like the final bill will be the whole $2tn (until we get an updated estimate from Roubini).

Christian MarxSeptember 19th, 2008 at 6:43 am

Now that Paulson and Bernanke have proposed a Resolution Trust Company, consumers can take their distressed mortgage loans, credit cards, auto loans and student loans and remove them form their “balance sheets” so they can go about their business as usual. (I would urge consumers to attempt this en masse, once the RTC gets going, to see what happens.)Right. The RTC proposal is not going to help the shopped out, debt laden consumer. Instead, the shopped out, debt-laden consumer is going to have an even bigger tax bill and fewer public goods to show for it, since resources that might have been allocated to them will be used to pay off debts that much of the public had nothing to do with.

Alessandro - http://castellidicarte.blogspot.com/September 19th, 2008 at 6:47 am

TREASURY SETS TEMPORARY GUARANTY PROGRAM FOR U.S. MONEY-MARKET FUNDSA few more billions of dollars moved from second line to taxpayer. (see my post on 2008-09-18 19:40:20)Looks like the final bill will be the whole $2tn (until we get an updated estimate from Roubini).

Christian MarxSeptember 19th, 2008 at 6:53 am

One imagines that the RTC will work on the assumption that businesses expect to buy from and sell goods to themselves, without involving the consumer. Consumption is 70% of GDP, but this amount is begrudged: businesses do most of the “important” spending–consumers have to be minimized at every turn.I’m doing what I can, in a one man protest, not to support this inequitable system: no purchases beyond basic necessities. No entertainment, no books (I already have a library enough to last several lifetimes), no dining out, no car, no travel (except for public transportation), no television, no CDs or DVDs, no luxuries.

ptmSeptember 19th, 2008 at 7:38 am

I look forward to hearing what the MSM have to say. It tells me if I’m ahead or behind the bouncing ball. And since MSM tells the sheeple what to think, it tells me what the average person is thinking.

ptmSeptember 19th, 2008 at 7:43 am

Oh, and my favorite from the other day occurred when some poor sap called into Cramer with a list of his stock picks and says: “Thank God we have you Cramer to help us through these tough times, without you we would be lost.”

Mother of GodSeptember 19th, 2008 at 8:01 am

All of these machinations are just astonishing?Not at all.All of these machinations are simply:what overpowered wealthgiants DO.All you are looking at is the sorry history of humanity ON REPEAT.When all this is over, the humans left will re-erect overpowered wealthgiants to rule over them.Like humans do.Humans be dumb. That’s not an insult, it’s a fact.

Mother of GodSeptember 19th, 2008 at 5:21 pm

You mean to see we have been hadding a sound night’s sleep?You may so.It is just, it is just about to, it is just about to rolywholy over.Of all the stranger things that ever not even in the hundrund and badst pageans of unthowsent and wonst nice…to be have happened!Phall if you but will, rise you must!(lovesoftfun at Finnegans Wake!) (apologies to our beloved James Joyce)

MarcoSeptember 21st, 2008 at 4:45 am

You showed very interesting facts, sir.But I have to repeat myself: I DO NOT have spoken about ANY “international economic Jewish conspiracy,”. Instead I have remembered the jewish origin of MANY neocons, that is I have spoken about a POLITICAL (not financial !) cabal which contributed to create the present mess.Of course – another repetition (repetita juvant… perhaps not the dumbs!) – I don’t dismiss the role played by lots of rebomb/reborn christians, aka fanta-christians, like your moron-in-chief (POTUS).That for the FACTS. I am NOT ethnically jewish, but this is NOT a good reason for not tell them.

click hereMay 30th, 2011 at 3:31 pm

I know this isn’t exactly on topic, however i have a website utilizing the same program as effectively and i am getting troubles with my comments displaying. is there a setting i am missing? it’s attainable you could assist me out? thanx.

Ezekiel ParkersMay 31st, 2011 at 3:31 am

Amazing piece. I was checking continuously this blog and I’m quite impressed! Very helpful info specifically the first part. I care for such information a lot. I was seeking this certain info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

Lucinda CockleyMay 31st, 2011 at 5:14 am

Great post. I was checking constantly this blog and I am quite impressed! Extremely helpful info particularly the first part. I care for such information much. I was looking for this particular info for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.

blu356ble765May 31st, 2011 at 10:07 am

This website is really a stroll-by for all the info you wished about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse right here, and also you’ll definitely uncover it.

sex master drinking gameMay 31st, 2011 at 12:05 pm

Thanks for all your valuable hard work on this blog. Ellie loves setting aside time for research and it is easy to see why. A lot of people hear all regarding the dynamic form you render helpful information via the website and therefore increase response from some other people on this issue plus my princess is certainly being taught a great deal. Have fun with the remaining portion of the year. You are always doing a brilliant job.

allies drinking gameMay 31st, 2011 at 2:52 pm

I wish to express some thanks to you just for bailing me out of this type of scenario. After browsing throughout the the net and seeing thoughts which are not productive, I believed my entire life was well over. Existing minus the solutions to the issues you have solved by way of the review is a serious case, and those that might have negatively affected my career if I hadn’t noticed your blog post. The knowledge and kindness in dealing with a lot of things was priceless. I am not sure what I would have done if I hadn’t discovered such a stuff like this. I can also at this time look forward to my future. Thanks very much for this high quality and result oriented help. I won’t hesitate to suggest your blog to any person who needs support on this area.

click hereMay 31st, 2011 at 2:55 pm

Very efficiently written information. It will likely be useful to anybody who usess it, including myself. Keep up the great work – for certain i’ll check out extra posts.

Chandra WagleyJune 1st, 2011 at 2:15 pm

The next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I know it was my option to read, but I truly thought youd have something fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could fix in case you werent too busy trying to find attention.

Jame FilippelliJune 1st, 2011 at 11:47 pm

Thank you for giving your thoughts. Being blogger, I am continually in need of fresh and different approaches to look at a matter. I actually get good inspiration in doing this. Many thanks again

EverettJune 5th, 2011 at 2:30 pm

Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If possible, as you achieve expertise, would you thoughts updating your blog with additional info? This can be very useful for me.

Dolores MinaaiJune 6th, 2011 at 1:19 pm

Hello! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I really enjoy reading your blog posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the same topics? Thanks a lot!

Hallie SitacaJune 7th, 2011 at 5:11 am

You ought to really think about engaged on growing this blog into a significant authority on this market. You evidently have a grasp deal with of the topics everyone is trying to find on this web site anyhow and you possibly can definitely even earn a buck or two off of some advertisements. I’d explore following current matters and elevating the amount of write ups you set up and I assure you抎 start seeing some wonderful targeted site visitors in the close to future. Just a thought, good luck in whatever you do!

Emory FlueggeJune 7th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

Man! Its such as you scan my mind! You seem to understand most concerning this, a bit like you wrote the book in it or something. i feel that you simply can do with some pictures to drive the content home a trifle, besides that, this is informative blog. A outstanding browse. unwell actually return once more.

StocklotsJune 8th, 2011 at 9:59 am

I am speechless. It is a superb blog and very attractive too. Great work! That’s not really much coming from an beginner writer like me, however it’s all I could say after diving into your posts. Nice grammar and vocabulary. Not like other blogs. You actually understand what you?re speaking about too. So much that you simply made me wish to explore more. Your blog has turn out to be a stepping stone for me, my friend.

cheapest full hd projectorJune 8th, 2011 at 10:35 am

It is a really amazing powerful resource that you’re offering and you simply provide it away cost-free!! I that is comparable to discovering websites which view the particular property value providing you with an excellent learning resource for zero cost. We truly dearly loved examining these pages. Be thankful!

puppy dog trainingJune 9th, 2011 at 12:11 pm

Im no expert, but I think you just made the best point. You obviously know what youre talking about, and I can really get behind that. Thanks for staying so upfront and so honest.

nurit 2085June 9th, 2011 at 5:14 pm

Congratulations on having Hands down the most sophisticated blogs Ive come throughout in many time! Its just incredible how much you can eliminate from a specific thing as a result of how visually beautiful it’s. Youve put collectively a very good blog space -great graphics, videos, layout. That is undoubtedly a must-see weblog!

frescaJune 10th, 2011 at 2:04 am

Congratulations on possessing definitely one of some of the sophisticated blogs Ive arrive throughout in some time! Its simply wonderful how a lot you’ll be capable of think about away from a thing basically simply because of how visually stunning it is. You’ve place collectively an important blog website house –nice graphics, films, layout. This is actually a must-see website!

ways to impress a girlJune 10th, 2011 at 2:10 am

Really like your web sites details! Undoubtedly an exquisite supply of data that’s extremely helpful. Stick with it to carry publishing and i’m gonna proceed reading by the use of! Cheers.

click hereJune 10th, 2011 at 3:29 am

Now you’ve your new site and also you’re keen to start making some gross sales! But, how are you going to make gross sales in case you don’t have high volumes of tourists to your web site?

Philips LED light bulbsJune 10th, 2011 at 9:29 am

Hello just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Chrome. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with web browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Cheers

poker gratuit en ligne sans inscriptionJune 10th, 2011 at 4:41 pm

Necessary to give you that minimal remark to thank you just as before for these spectacular techniques you might have provided in this article. It’s so particularly generous with folks that you to generate unreservedly what many people could have marketed just as one e-book to earn some dough for themselves, primarily since you may have used it should you wanted. The tactics also acted to turn into good way to recognize that most of us have similar desire just like my own to grasp very much more with this condition. I’m there are countless nicer opportunities in advance if you examine your site post.

tpmsJune 10th, 2011 at 10:59 pm

My partner and I absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your post’s to be exactly I’m looking for. Do you offer guest writers to write content for yourself? I wouldn’t mind producing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write regarding here. Again, awesome web log!

Sasha GrayJune 11th, 2011 at 10:13 am

It’s an incredibly amazing powerful resource that you’re offering and you simply provide it away cost-free!! I quite like discovering websites which often be aware of the particular importance of giving you beautiful learning resource for zero cost. We truly dearly loved examining this article. Have fun here!

nrasJune 11th, 2011 at 10:59 am

I think this is the single most vital information in my opinion. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, Your website style is ideal, the articles really is excellent : D. Good job, cheers

rasteirinhas femininasJune 12th, 2011 at 11:41 am

I like the valuable knowledge you be offering to your articles. I can bookmark your weblog and feature my youngsters take a look at up right here generally. I’m reasonably sure they will be told a variety of new stuff right here than anyone else!

nataliaJune 13th, 2011 at 8:17 am

in any clumsy design devoid of taking the item about broad that when individuals acquire an important next charge card connected with L6, 000, these people have already about three a credit card by now with debts totalling 23, 000.

green iphoneJune 13th, 2011 at 8:24 am

Great blog post. What I would like to add is that pc memory ought to be purchased should your computer is unable to cope with what you do by using it. One can deploy two RAM boards having 1GB each, as an example, but not certainly one of 1GB and one with 2GB. One should check the company’s documentation for the PC to ensure what type of storage is necessary.

Teak Furniture IndonesiaJune 13th, 2011 at 8:34 am

Can I simply say what a relief to find somebody who actually knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You positively know easy methods to carry a difficulty to light and make it important. Extra people have to learn this and understand this side of the story. I cant imagine youre not more popular because you definitely have the gift.

loan for people with bad creditJune 13th, 2011 at 10:40 am

Does your website have a contact page? I’m having problems locating it but, I’d like to shoot you an e-mail. I’ve got some suggestions for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

Order Teak FurnitureJune 13th, 2011 at 12:40 pm

I want to show my appreciation to this writer for bailing me out of such a setting. Just after looking out throughout the the web and seeing principles that were not helpful, I thought my entire life was over. Being alive minus the answers to the difficulties you have fixed by way of this website is a crucial case, and the kind that might have badly affected my career if I hadn’t come across the website. Your good ability and kindness in playing with everything was precious. I am not sure what I would’ve done if I had not discovered such a step like this. It’s possible to at this point relish my future. Thanks for your time very much for the professional and results-oriented guide. I won’t be reluctant to endorse your blog to anyone who wants and needs guide about this situation.

reef sandalJune 13th, 2011 at 7:38 pm

Hi, I just discovered your weblog via Bing. Your article is truly applicable to my life right now, and I’m really pleased I discovered your website.

Ephedra FatburnerJune 13th, 2011 at 9:08 pm

Ephedrine ist der schnellste Fatburner der Welt. Ephedrine Fatburner Tabs funktionieren besonders! Unter Zuhilfenahme von Ephedrine habe ich stracks sechs Kilos Körperfett reduziert! Mittels des Einsatzes von Ephedrine HCL zu deinem Wunschbody…

bosch absJune 14th, 2011 at 4:19 am

Thank you for an additional fantastic blog. Where else may one get that sort of information written in such an ideal way? I actually have a presentation that i am presently working on, and that i have been looking for such info instead.

Ephedrine 50mgJune 14th, 2011 at 4:41 am

Ephedrin HCL ist der stärkste Fatburner weltweit. Ephedrin Fatburner Stacks funktionieren überaus! Mithilfe von Ephedrin haben meine Frau und ich stracks 5 kg Körperfett reduziert! Mittels Ephedrine HCL zu deinem schlanken Body:)

Janay PapillionJune 14th, 2011 at 8:17 pm

Just needed to mention your blog is incredibly smart. I sometimes like to hear thusme thing new concerning this mainly because I have the similar blog in my Country on this subject so this help´s me plenty. I did a research on an issue matter and observed a very sensible variety of blogs however nothing like this.Thanks for sharing such a lot in your blog.

watch transformers 3 dark of the moon onlineJune 15th, 2011 at 7:29 am

Wonderful goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to and you are just extremely wonderful. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what you’re saying and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it smart. I cant wait to read much more from you. This is really a great website.

hostingJune 15th, 2011 at 12:11 pm

There are certain posts on the market near this, There’s no doubt that taking there reference could experience chose to make this spot or article really informative. That’s not me expression this information is not good. Simply I’ve got to pronounce the fact that info provided here was unique, merely to make it more in close proximity to complete, supporting compared to other former information will get been actually good. The points you get touched listed here are vital, thus I’m going to spot a lot of the information here to create this actually great for entirely the newbie’s here. Thanks for these details. Actually helpful!

ipad gpsJune 15th, 2011 at 6:48 pm

Congratulations on having 1 of the most sophisticated blogs Ive come throughout in some time! Its just incredible how much you can remove from one thing thanks to how visually beautiful it’s. Youve put collectively an excellent blog space -great graphics, videos, layout. This really is undoubtedly a must-see weblog!

Sexartikelen kopenJune 15th, 2011 at 8:11 pm

Its really one of the nice blog that gives the nice info on insects and about the wild plants and animal.I am a wild life photographer and I love to see these type of pictures.I always watch National Geography channel and I really enjoy all the programs of it.Thanks a lot for this blog here.Hoping o see some more pictures like this.

Webmarket ProtocolsJune 15th, 2011 at 9:38 pm

I recently unearthed your site yesterday evening and so i are generally examining it’s continually. You now have a great deal of helpful tips these and i also take pleasure in your lifestyle to the net site extremely. Keep up to date acknowledge that there are tasks!

Pasquale PipkinsJune 16th, 2011 at 5:47 am

Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this. Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.

p90xJune 16th, 2011 at 8:21 am

I have recently started using the blogengine.net and I having some problems here? in your blog you stated that we need to enable write permissions on the App_Data folder…unfortunately I don’t understand how to enable it.

MusicaJune 16th, 2011 at 9:18 pm

People like you should be ranked even better in search engines as this is what readers like me want to read. Content is great. money from fiverr Thanks

Eusebia MatusiewiczJune 16th, 2011 at 10:37 pm

Millions of Americans take pills, powders and drinks to enhance body tone, lose weight, sculpt themselves and perform better at sports. But they may be doing themselves more harm than good, especially the male teenagers most likely to take the sports supplements that are so easily available in stores or over the Internet. This is what I read on the internet the other day, how come theres not health warnings on these things!

mbtJune 17th, 2011 at 6:43 am

Hello there, i do believe that we observed an individual been to my own internet site hence my partner and i stumbled on âreturn the particular favorâ. I will be searching for what to increase my own internet site! Perhaps the alright to employ a number of your thinking!!

buy green coffeeJune 17th, 2011 at 8:30 am

Im no expert, but I think you just made an excellent point. You definitely fully understand what youre speaking about, and I can seriously get behind that. Thanks for being so upfront and so sincere.

bettingJune 17th, 2011 at 9:47 am

Just right points?I’d note that as somebody who in point of fact doesn’t write on blogs much (in fact, this may be my first publish), I don’t assume the term ‘lurker’ may be very becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s now not your fault in the slightest degree , but possibly the blogosphere may come up with a better, non-creepy identify for the ninety% folks that enjoy reading the content material .

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.