EconoMonitor

Nouriel Roubini's Global EconoMonitor

Bloomberg TV Interview: Worst Financial Crisis Since the Great Depression and Worst U.S. Recession in Decades

I was on Bloomberg TV this morning being interviewed about financial markets, the economy and the upcoming testimony by Bernanke.

As I put it in the interview: “This is a systemic financial crisis, there is no end to it,” Nouriel Roubini, professor of economics and international business at New York University, told Bloomberg Television. “It’s a vicious circle between a contracting economy and greater credit and financial losses feeding on the economy.”

Regular readers of this blog are familiar with my views. But here is a summary and significant extended update of my views that this will turn out to be the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and the worst US recession in decades…

307 Responses to “Bloomberg TV Interview: Worst Financial Crisis Since the Great Depression and Worst U.S. Recession in Decades”

Michael KhorJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:01 am

First, I am extremely surprised that Prof.Roubini is probably the only expert who consistently warns the public about the mother of all financial meltdown in the US. Where are the other experts? Are they too busy working on their own agenda and probably thinking of how to enrich themselves and provide sporadic warning when the situations suit their profit objectives.Second, like Prof. has always warned that the last rally after the Bear Stearn bailout was a sucker rally because this is an effective way for the big sharks to distribute their shares to smaller investors especially those who have not seen/experienced a Super Bear market. Third, I still remember during the Asian Financial Crisis, where the then Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin, and his Deputy, Lawrence Summers were advocating the affected countries should not seek growth through investment of unproductive assets,namely, housing. How true was that. Alas, Mr. Rubin appears not to have preach the same principle to Citigroup. However, it is hard to comprehend that one decade later, the US experience the similar problems plus others in much much larger scale.Can an economy keep on growing and prospering via consumer spending (unproductive allocation of capital) and deficit financing? I am not sure about an advance country like the US but I am definitely sure that an average household can not just survive long-term by living beyound its means.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:09 am

Dow back inthe 10′s and SP fighting here to hold 12′s! Today could be the day we fall 500 points in the dow….

randyJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:17 am

I just read that Benny said the fed governors expect 1 – 1.6 growth in the US economy this year! Are they on crack? No wonder nobody believes anything the Fed or the Treasury says anymore. They are constantly inconsistent.I hope the crash comes and let’s get it over with.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:18 am

PPT drawing a line in the sand early? Of course, the rest of the free-trading equity markets around the world trade down 2%-5% overnight and we in teh Paulson-controled markets can’t fall more than 1%!

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:29 am

Bernanke Signals Growth Risks for Economy, `Intensified’ Inflation Danger — bloomberg The old fool. Do not the idler and the spendthrift know, even in the midst of their glorious fling, that they are headed for a future of debt and poverty? – hazlitt

ptmJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:32 am

Here is another thought. The average cost of gasoline from 1999-2007 cost an average of 0.15 goldgrams per gallon. Using that figure, may be we could predict the price of gold based upon an inflated dollar cost of a gallon of gasoline? Here are the results, I also added the price of oil per barrel for comparison.——–Goldgram—-Gold——Oil$/Gal—per gallon–$/oz——$/barrel4——-0.150——-800.000—1334.5—–0.150——-900.000—1505——-0.150——1000.000—1675.5—–0.150——1100.000—1836——-0.150——1200.000—2006.5—–0.150——1300.000—2177——-0.150——1400.000—233As you can see, with current gas prices at $4.10/gal and gold currently at $980, it’s a conservative estimate.

MatthiasJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:33 am

A firend of mine was in N.Y. last two weeks and visited a former Bear Stearns employee.Someone who takes about 1,2 million/y.She and her fellows dont get it even now.They are all so convident of themselves, unbelievable.Next she is gone run a hedge fond an will buy a house at the Hamptons.As long as all these Idiots believe they can go on with this game nothing will change.This whole Caste must disappear.

Alex GreyJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:04 am

I have thought for a long time that the view of Bernanke has the causality reversed. Bernanke believes that a financial crisis is the key factor in a deflationary asset spiral. If you can stop the financial crisis then you can stop the deflationary spiral. This explains his aggressive actions to stabilise the financial system. I think this reasoning has the causality backwards. Instead it is collapsing asset markets (in this case housing) that cause a financial crisis – trying to solve the latter won’t stop the former. Bernanke’s views are heavily shaped by his research on the Great Depression but he is applying the approach now that he thinks should have been applied in the Great Depression (and because it wasn’t then the US experienced an unprecedented economic collapse). I think that the work of Shiller in particular on the dynamics of asset markets provides a much better explanation for why asset prices can collapse. The primary cause is a swing in expecations which causes demand for the asset (in this case housing) to collapse. The ensuing financial crisis is an effect of this swing in expectations, not its cause. It is true that a financial crisis can certainly accelerate the move form A to B but not the fact that we eventually end up at B.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:05 am

With today’s retail sales number, my estimate for Q2 GDP is -.23. Her comes your first official negative quarter of growth…

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:07 am

11:06 a.m. [WM] Washington Mutual shares rise 14%, to $3.6811:06 a.m. [LEH] Lehman Bros. shares rise 12% to $13.9311:06 a.m. [FHN] Fist Horizon shares jump 32%, to $6.62

CaponeJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:07 am

see oil in free fall…now we get to see if oil’s price crashing / correcting still causes equities to still deeply correct / crash as there are so many equities tied to high oil prices…

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:22 am

11:21 a.m.Crude slumps more than $9 as Bush, Bernanke talk11:21 a.m. GSE rescue ‘amateur socialism:’ Republican Sen. Bunning

Play OnJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:25 am

The 1980 inflation adjusted price of oil is $93! The US economy is dead above that price. Oil dropping to $139 today is NOTHING!

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:26 am

Dow 10K is evidently unacceptable…Paulson probably orderd Goldman to slam the piss out of oil while simultaniously buying up bank stocks to give the illusion all is well…

randyJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:27 am

unbelievable! the DOW has just gained over 150 points in 30 minutes…mostly banking stocks. I guess the PPT is buying calls in the BKX!!!!!!!!If the DOW does not go down significantly in the next week or so, I’m selling all my shorts at my current profit and getting out before I get screwed by Benny.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:49 am

So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past. – F. Scott FitzgeraldIt is common for our self-dealing elites to speak in terms of abstractions to confuse the public while they’re busy divvying up the treasury; they willfully ignore that the collectivity, the “nation” whose money they are divvying, is made up of individuals who give the nation meaning.Opening wide the discount windows into the treasury for their nefarious friends – GSE the junk dealer and SPV the fat banker, TAF the repackager and TSLF and PDCF the primary dealers – is legal plunder. Hopefully, Fannie and Freddie, those partners in crime, are too fat to get through.And they call this a “reserve” system.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:57 am

Ponzi game -> USA stock market not allowed to fall. Domestic investing is full of deception. Going international.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:04 am

According to Ben: Helping financial markets return to more normal functioning remains “a top priority,” Bernanke said in semiannual testimony on the economy to the Senate Banking Committee. There are “significant downside risks to the outlook for growth,” and “upside risks to the inflation outlook have intensified,” he said.He forgot to add, “So what?”If Bernanke doesn’t say the financials are “priority,” the boys will get somebody who will.

RandyJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:15 am

CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT GETTING OUT. I THINK I’M HANGING IN TO THE END. I’VE GOT TIME. F^%&K BERNANKE ET AL.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:18 am

There it is, in a nutshell. “It’s a vicious circle between a contracting economy and greater credit and financial losses feeding on the economy.” (NR)This it is, The Breakup, and only Roubini saw it coming. It’s happening – history in the making

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:30 am

12:28 p.m. Banks fall to five-year lows in sharply lower Europe12:28 p.m. Bank worries send Europe stocks to three-year lowsfunny how all other indexes trade freely…

NoviceJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:35 am

Mr. Roubini thank you so much for telling it like it is, in a way even a novice economist like me can understand. Your comment during the interview that they:"privatize the gains and socialize the losses" says it all. It is a sad day in our history and future generations will bare the consequences of the actions of a these corrupt men. There is no stopping the tsunami that is hurtling towards us, but I am thankful that you have cried the warning and hopefully some will heed it and be prepared for what may be the worst economic disaster to ever hit the world stage.Thank-you

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:41 am

THATS IT! From now on, I am just loading up at every 3 digit sell-off low and I will be rich in no time!

PRWJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:46 am

funny how all other indexes trade freely…Written by Guest on 2008-07-15 11:30:50As far as i can see most major indexes follow the Dow.The graphs for the FTSE100, DAX, CAC etc are almost exact maps to the DOW (apart from opening adjustments each morning to catch up on what the DOW did the previous evening)Can anyone explain how this happens?

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:01 pm

Nouriel Roubini’s message hits the web.Sweet Bernanke-Paulson’s Baadassss Song by Michael S. Rozeff (a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York)July 15, 2008 – Excerpts:[Bernanke and Paulson] have sold out themselves and the American people in a futile attempt to keep two burnt-out cases, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, alive and nubile. They are the male prostitutes in this real-life drama. In a state of intellectual darkness, these leaders of Fed and Treasury have engineered a rape. It is a rape of helpless American taxpayers, the shenanigans of their benighted political financial leadership being well beyond their control.Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are known as "Government sponsored enterprises" or GSEs. Because of their ability to raise funds at advantageous rates, due to the government sponsorship, they over-stimulated the housing market to unheard of heights by buying mortgages originated by banks nationwide. Now, as these hallmark institutions of government manipulation of the housing market fail, the failure of government itself becomes ever more evident. The attempt to restore the GSEs cannot hide their failure from anyone who looks. That failure is already registered in the financial markets. Once a $90 stock, FNM is now a $10 stock. And FRE has fallen from over $70 to $7. The stocks have drastically slumped because of the bad investments of the GSEs in mortgages, investments urged on and subsidized by longstanding policies of the Federal government.On July 13, 2008, Fed and Treasury announced steps to shore up the two mortgage giants. These steps include access to the Fed’s lending at a preferential rate of 2.25 percent, greatly increased access to credit from the U.S. Treasury, and the purchase of stock in these companies by the U.S. Treasury. Between them, the Fed and the U.S. government are nationalizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.The recommended measures, being hustled through Congress, have several negative consequences. (1) The GSEs are to be kept in the business of being the major end-buyers of housing loans. This maintains the same system that has led to the current mortgage market woes and does nothing at all to rectify the situation. (2) By maintaining the system and opening both the Fed and the Treasury to the GSEs, the latter can actually become even larger. (3) They will also be even more beholden and responsive to the political forces surrounding the housing business.(4) The Fed will provide the GSEs with money loans, on either Treasury or a GSE’s own debt as collateral. That is directly inflationary and amounts to printing money and placing it at the disposal of the GSEs. (5) If money has to be created for the GSEs, there is less that can be created for all the other many banks that are in trouble. The Fed is less likely to discount their bad paper. This may be one reason (beyond the Indymac failure) why regional bank shares fell so sharply on the news (an index was down more than 8 percent).(6) Feeding the GSEs taxpayer dollars from the Treasury is a pure bailout. It rewards them for financing too many mortgages and too many mortgages of low quality. It means that Congress intends business as usual. (7) More government money and government stock ownership enlarge the GSEs while worsening the control and financial structures of the company. Any control by the government is going to enhance politically-motivated conflicts about the company policies and retard taking politically unpopular measures. The GSEs become even more of a political football than they already are. (8) Another negative result is that the uncertainty surrounding the financial crisis will be prolonged. (9) Instead of the Fed and Treasury strengthening the GSEs, the GSEs will weaken the Fed and Treasury, that is, weaken the government. The government debt will rise. This jeopardizes other government programs, which is likely to end up either being inflationary or mean higher taxes. The Fed is basically losing a degree of independence while kowtowing to the dominant political forces, which weakens it and raises the odds of higher inflation. (10) Giving the GSEs taxpayer monies weakens the country’s productivity. It takes capital out of the private sector and transfers it to an industry that is already overbuilt…Bernanke has exaggerated fears of declines in asset prices, especially stock prices. He overreacted and caved in the Bear Stearns case. He has made clear his anxieties and apprehensions about the banking system, derivatives, and investment banks. But price declines are just what is needed to place depreciated assets in the hands of those willing to shoulder the risks of owning them. Price declines will raise the expected rates of return on assets to proper levels…http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff209.html

randyJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:01 pm

you can bet your ass that Europe and Asia have their versions of the PPT. All these central banking crooks conspire to screw the average working man.I’m so disgusted with the USA. If I didn’t have kids in HS, I’d move somewhere else.I now agree with the "guest" above, on the next early morning three digit drop, I’m loading up and probably will sell when the PPT makes it all go green! Why not profit from it! They are!

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:05 pm

Should we expect the market to move lower as is usual after today’s horse-and-pony show is over?

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:07 pm

1:01 p.m.[FNM] SEC proposes limits on shorting Fannie, Freddie shares: CNBCLOLOL go long all you want but don’t your dare short stocks!!!!!!!!!

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:18 pm

Dont abuse socialists.The rest of the world outside the US have another grasp of socialism.It is NOT comunism.Americans are affected since Mcarthy.Dont make this mistake again.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:22 pm

CNBC now reports SEC Chairman Cox to place new limits to short sales on FNM and FRE !Talk about blatant intervention in "free" markets. What a disgust. Now the government is selectively deciding winners.Maybe they will agree to limit short sales on my holdings. More likely, they will instead place limits on long buys on commodities. Goodbye capitalism, hello socialism.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:22 pm

So, you can basically no longer short Phony, Fraudy and the primary dealers-nice "free" market!

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

The US markets are now going to be a "long only" market place! We will all be rich becuase nothing will ever be allowed to go down again!! GET LONG PEOPLE@!!

GloomyJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:52 pm

OIL AND THE MARKETI only caught a bit of Bernanke’s testimony on CNBC, but they briefly interupted it to report oil had dropped $10. According to oil traders, banks were liquidating everything they could find in order to raise cash this morning, dumping huge amounts of oil and gas contracts. So the market cheers this fall in energy prices, without realizing the profoundly negative implications for financials.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

Stonewall RoubiniWhen the Federal invasion of Virginia began in July 1861, Thomas Jonathan Jackson, a commander of Confederate forces on the field of The Battle of Bull Run (Manassas), stood so strong as the enemy attacked that a colleague remarked, “There is Jackson, standing like a stone wall.” General Stonewall Jackson has become a symbol of men who stand for principle against the odds. Today, our Professor could rightly wear the nickname, Stonewall Roubini.Question after question in today’s Bloomberg TV interview, Professor Nouriel Roubini answered with bullet-proof resolve that it’s the worst US recession in decades, the financial crisis is going to get worse, and the action of the authorities is misdirected and harmful. His message all year has never changed because he’s one of the few economic observers who’s predicted all along what is now coming to pass.Don’t miss this performance, one of the greatest exercises of integrity every exhibited by an economist of Roubini’s stature.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:56 pm

@Guest on 2008-07-15 12:22:55only ‘naked’ shortsMarket regulator limits shorting of Fannie, Freddie, primary dealersSEC Chairman Cox announces an emergency order restricting practice of shorting key institutions without first borrowing the shares sold.

tutterfrutJuly 15th, 2008 at 12:59 pm

This is the first hearing where Paulson and Bernanke get really ‘interesting’ questions from some of your representatives. There’s still hope…

GloomyJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:00 pm

Nouriel, Great work as always! 12 Steps to Financial Disaster was right on the mark. However, don’t you think it is likely the recession/depression will last much longer than 18 months, as our government has decided to mummify financial institutions ala Japan?

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:15 pm

@ Guest > CNBC now reports SEC Chairman Cox to place new limits to short sales on FNM and FRE!Coxes Markets is a roulette game of chance where the house controls the wheel.Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about seeking whom he may devour. 1 Peter 5:8

CaponeJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:18 pm

no way! the semi annual Bernanke testimony was interrupted with the $10 oil drop GOOD news and the deep sell off reversed. Wow, what a coincidence! WAG the DOG! only the dog appears to be catching on to the endless games…

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:20 pm

Ha…Lehman Brothers Chief Executive Richard Fuld is considering ways to take the Wall Street investment bank private, the New York Post reported on Tuesday.They are offended, nobody want my stocks, wawawawawah.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:21 pm

What about limits on naked short positions on SLV? Can’t do that since it might expose a lack of inventory.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

Gloomy,TPTB wouldn’t be creating this much loss of confidence in the government if they weren’t tremendously in trouble, probably more than 18 months’ worth.Joe SixPack suspects there’s something very fishy and dangerous about dollars which aren’t paid for in blood and sweat.

GloomyJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:25 pm

THE RACE IS ONFreddie is down 25% today. Fannie is down 18%. Will Congress take action before the stock is less than $1? Place your bets ladies and gentlemen!!

CaponeJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:40 pm

why not ban short selling entirely like they did on the Karachi and the index went up 15% in one day ! so the SEC is taking a page out of Pakistan’s market plunge management ?

randyJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:46 pm

I wish NR would address how the PPT is influencing the markets and how, over the long-term, they are just delaying the inevitable crash and, of course, making it much worse.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:49 pm

US markets set to roar up at the close! The witching hour is near, watch this thing soar so they can report headlines like "Stocks reverse huge losses to finish with huge gains, cheering Bernanke, Paulson"

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

SEC Chairman Cox announces an emergency order restricting practice of shorting key institutions without first borrowing the shares soldI thought naked shoring has been illegal all along!!! SO they are admitting they don’t enforce it but for companies they deem "key institutions"! WHat about my stock I own where the total shares shroted is greater than the entire float!!!!!????? Who is gonna protect me???? Friggin SCUMBAGS!!!!!!!!!!!

BenJuly 15th, 2008 at 1:57 pm

Question for Prof. Roubini:what about Gold?Gold is recommanded as a protection against inflation, so Gold should increase for a few coming months before the commodity price decrease. but will the gold decrease also? there are so many bailout that such an increase in the monetary mass M3 should increase the gold price for a long time no?thanks for the answer if you have time.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 2:03 pm

350 point reversal for th eDow, once again saved at 11,000. This is criminal in any other country on earth….

AfAJuly 15th, 2008 at 2:09 pm

That was funny"Really!?" She said, when Professor Roubini affirmed "Inflation gonna be the last of the problems of the Fed"And I think the ‘Really!?’ is shared by so many people.@ Alex Grey, I agree that Bernanke is to central bankers what Don Quixote was to knights. He is fighting a war that it is not his: GD I in the 1930′s in 2008.

AlessandroJuly 15th, 2008 at 3:02 pm

Wild roller-coaster on monster volume and we close down. Is the PPT still in control?Miss America I’m dieing to hear your opinion ;)

GloomyJuly 15th, 2008 at 3:16 pm

SHEEPLES AND THE EDGE OF THE MARKET CLIFFLook at the lines outside of IndyMac. Sheeples don’t like insolvent banks. Very soon the FDIC will start closing banks in large numbers and the sheeple are going to start to panic (appropriately, at last) and start to sell stocks. The edge of the equity market cliff isn’t so far off.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

Meredith Whitney Cuts Wachovia on `Bleak’ Prospects (Update3)July 15 (Bloomberg) — Oppenheimer & Co.’s Meredith Whitney, the analyst who correctly predicted Citigroup Inc. would reduce its dividend this year, said the earnings outlook for Wachovia Corp. has “dramatically diminished” and bank stocks will keep falling until asset prices “get real.”Wachovia fell as much as 13 percent in New York trading after Whitney said prospects for shareholders of the Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank are “bleak.” Mortgage assets are still priced too high on U.S. banks’ balance sheets, she said. “Historically, financials have not shrunk well,” the New York-based analyst said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. She said Wachovia last week released charge-off figures that didn’t correspond with portfolio values, meaning the bank might be shrinking its balance sheet. “Your revenues go down dramatically. Effectively, you’d be eroding capital.”The world’s biggest financial services companies have posted more than $416 billion of losses and writedowns tied to the mortgage-market collapse…

GLOOMYJuly 15th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

GOD BLESS HIM!!Sen. Bunning opposes giving Fed more powers Kentucky senator vows to do everything he can to block expanded powers for Federal ReserveJuly 15, 2008: 02:34 PM ESTNEW YORK (Associated Press) – U.S. Sen. Jim Bunning said Tuesday he will do everything in his power to block a proposal to grant the Federal Reserve sweeping new powers in response to the nation’s wobbly financial system.Bunning, a frequent Fed critic, heaped more scorn on the central bank during a conference call with reporters in Kentucky, his home state. The Republican blamed the Fed’s policies for contributing to a myriad of economic woes, from surging inflation and a declining dollar to a housing bust and an ongoing credit crisis. He said the Fed shirked its responsibility to properly regulate all lenders."The Fed wants more power, but the Fed has proven that it can’t be trusted with the power it has," Bunning said. "… Maybe we should give them less to do, so they can get it right."Bunning’s opposition to strengthening the Fed puts him at odds with the Bush administration.A blueprint unveiled earlier this year by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson would expand the Fed’s powers to oversee investment banks and protect the stability of the entire financial system.The proposal is currently before Congress, and Bunning said he was ready to fight it."This one senator you’re talking to right now will do everything in his power to stop any additional powers that will go to the Federal Reserve," Bunning said. "And I have a lot of means at my disposal."Individual senators have considerable procedural options to slow or stall legislation.Bunning kept up his criticism later in the day during a Senate Banking Committee hearing at which Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke said the U.S. economy is facing "numerous difficulties."Bunning, a Hall of Fame pitcher, used a baseball analogy to take another swipe at the central bank."Giving the Fed more power is like giving the neighborhood kid who broke your window playing baseball in the street a bigger bat and thinking that will fix the problem," Bunning said.Bunning also was scornful of the Fed’s action to back a Bear Stearns rescue package.As the nation’s then-fifth-largest investment bank teetered on the brink of bankruptcy, the Fed agreed to provide backing for up to $30 billion for a deal for JPMorgan to take over the troubled company.While speaking to reporters, Bunning referred to it as a bailout, calling it an "abuse of the Federal Reserve’s power to interfere in the free market."Bunning also was critical of recent action by the Fed and the Treasury Department to come to the rescue of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At the Senate hearing, Bunning said it was proof that "socialism is alive and well in America."The companies hold or guarantee more than $5 trillion in mortgages, almost half of the nation’s total.The Bush administration is asking Congress to temporarily increase lines of credit to Fannie and Freddie and to let the government buy their stock."Why don’t we just have government control of all of the free market that we have in this country," Bunning told reporters. "Let’s go to France 25 years ago and become a socialistic country. I’m not going to vote for that."

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 4:00 pm

Great post Mr. Roubini again.There is one point where you are wrong. The oil price will not go down. The coming energy crises will have much worse effects than the credit crunch. The current crises is only a warm up.

JoshuaJuly 15th, 2008 at 4:33 pm

"Thus, equity prices will fall by about 40% relative to their peak."I don’t understand this point insofar as you stated in your interview that prices will fall another 20% this year alone.

AnonymousJuly 15th, 2008 at 5:26 pm

Senator Jim Bunning QSen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke questions about monetary policySounds like a grandstander, wher has he been the last 6 years?

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 6:14 pm

Interesting to see if there will be a diminished news coverage around Senator Bunning’s point of view. Or perhaps the current administration feels that there are not enough people who know enough about economy so they will just try to push through Paulson’s proposal anyway.What I would like to know is whether Paulson’s proposal has any clauses that increase the direct government control over e.g. private mortgages? Or is it only about government control over financial institutions?

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

Point #6 from Prof. Roubinis article above:The FDIC that has already depleted 10% of its funds in the rescue of IndyMac alone will run out of fundsThis will likely lead to more bank runs in the U.S. But of course the majority of the people may not know about the situation at FDIC…

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 7:33 pm

As we are now entering the very beginning of the global economic, monetary and financial collapse. demographically speaking, I believe that it is becoming potently clear that not only was my analysis technically correct, back in 2006, but my stated identified reasons for the cause of this calamity was also spot on: namely, a total lack of understanding of the science of economics, a arrogance and false pretense by academic and bureaucratic economists (professional – HaH!)in general, in their belief of economics as a religious dogma (a dogma always needs support), self-agenda (moral hazard) and just plain fundamental incompetence.It is predictable that the incompetent true-believers will always revert to uber-control mechanisms when their station is in jeopardy – from "USA good old Democracy" (which everyone must have or face death) onto communism, socialism, fascism etc., etc., onward christian soldiers, blah blah, blah, to war and destruction.The middle-game has just begun; this week.Now we will face the judgement of the incompetent in all its glory; it is called "hell".Professor: I knew you had it in you so congratulations but really the story and the "end-game" were predictably visible back in early 2005.Ho humPeterJB

KJ FoehrJuly 15th, 2008 at 7:57 pm

You guys are now on the same side as Kudlow, Luskin, and Wesbury!Do you really think ex-baseball player Jim Bunning knows better than Bernanke and Paulson what this economy needs now? That’s a laugh!Socialism follows free-market capitalism as surely as the cart follows the ox. The 25 year orgy of greed is over; either we have socialism now or more socialism later. We either try to reduce the financial meltdown by “bailing out” banks and other corporations, or we see the implement a plethora of wealth transferring social programs a la the New Deal after the economy collapses. So choose your poison: a little socialism now or a whole lot more later. (If you think Hank is really a closet socialist, just wait until the Obama team takes charge!)And not only have our free-marketeers brought us the worst financial crisis since the GD, they have enabled foreigners to buy our companies such as Bud and now Sprint at bargain basement prices. Aren’t globalization and free-trade great!?Bunning is one of the Senate’s most conservative members, gaining high marks from several conservative interest groups. He was ranked by National Journal as the second-most conservative United States Senator in their March 2007 conservative/liberal rankings, after Sen. Jim DeMint(R-SC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_BunningWhen your house is on fire you don’t worry about the damage the fireman will do with his water hose; you just hope he can save your house from burning down to the ground!Well guess what, our house in on fire, and if you don’t let the firemen do their job there may be nothing left but a pile of ashes where the world’s sole superpower once stood.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 8:09 pm

@KJ Foehr: >Do you really think ex-baseball player Jim Bunning knows better than Bernanke and Paulson what this economy needs now?I think I know better than Bernanke and Paulson what this economy needs now.

KJ FoehrJuly 15th, 2008 at 8:14 pm

Guest on 2008-07-15 20:09:27“I think I know better than Bernanke and Paulson what this economy needs now.”Well we are all entitled to our opinion.Care to share yours?

AnonVJuly 15th, 2008 at 8:24 pm

@ KJ Foehr Sometimes it is better to let the fire take it’s course when the house is too far ravaged by the flames. The cost to rebuild is sometimes much greater than the cost to start over.

AnonymousJuly 15th, 2008 at 8:30 pm

Socialism is fine, if socialism is to follow capitalism and the orgy of greed.But shouldn’t the benefits go to normal people in our country rather than international investment banks? The government is protecting investment banks (constraining short selling of their stocks) that have no allegiance to our country! The only involvement of the normal citizens is to pay.I’ve not been a fan of Bunning, but here he has the right view. Let the chips fall where they may. At least the normal people won’t take all the pain that way.

AnonVJuly 15th, 2008 at 8:43 pm

@ Guest on 2008-07-15 20:09:27Guest, as KJ Foehr said, please enlighten us with your opinion.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 8:44 pm

@KJFoehr: Well we are all entitled to our opinion. Care to share yours?This is Hayek’s crash, what always happens to a planned economy. We’ve headed into it now. The people behind the Fed stage, the shadow central planners, will not except anything less than that they get theirs’ before it collapses. That’s what’s happening. When Greenspan was put into office as Fed chair, it was the end of his independent ideas. From then on out he was a messenger. Bernanke now has no thoughts of his own; he’s on stage carrying out orders. When Ben was a college professor, he allegedly looked at both sides. When he became Fed chair, he became a soldier.As for Paulson, I believe we are dealing directly with a member of the banking cartel.That’s how I see it.

AnonymousJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:05 pm

Check out the, in plain site, obvious take down of gold this evening. Look at the last 1 1/5 hours, you tell me if this at all looks normal. Banking Cartel at it’s finest,. as they got their asses handed to them today in the market, which was something Senator Bunning was telling Pauson, as he ripped this asshole apart in todays hearings.

AnonymousJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:17 pm

Also, if you view the video links provided of the hearings, tell me you don’t see Paulson and Bernanke sweating bullets, Paulson sounded like a bumbling idiot, and I caught several cases of him stuttering. Den of Thiefs!

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:24 pm

“Marc Faber: Fed Taking Americans For A Ride” “The first thing that people should do is stop listening to the Federal Reserve in America, and specifically to Mr. Ben Bernanke… They are misleading the public and investors by claiming they want to have a strong dollar and that they’re concerned about inflation. But when it comes to actions, they show no concern about inflation and [about] the ordinary Americans and middle class at all.” (July 11)http://www.boom2bust.com/

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 9:40 pm

[Richard] Benson’s Economic & Market Trends"Is Your Money Safe?"July 15, 2008 — Clearly, individual investors should have been asking whether their money was safe time and time again over the past year, rather than listening to the pundits on CNN. Many investors thought they had invested their money wisely and relied solely on the advice of their brokers. But now they’re emotionally distraught because they realize they were misled big time. But how were they misled? First, many investors over the past four years invested in some real funky hedge funds that were heavily into mortgage and asset-backed securities, CDO’s, CLO’s, and long-term illiquid assets. They were led to believe they would be able to get their money out in as little as three to six months if they needed to. But instead of ready-access to cash, the Bear Stearns funds (as one example) delivered losses of almost 100 percent. Presently, there are a number of hedge funds in total “lock down” where the money checked in, but it won’t be checking out for a very long time. Like a roach motel! (At least the asset managers will continue getting their fees!)Over the past five years, Wall Street introduced Structured Investment Vehicles (SIV’s) to the world. These SIV’s were a way for major banks to fund hundreds of billions in asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities with short-term commercial paper off the banks’ balance sheet. In the past year, SIVs basically collapsed. Some investors in SIV’s were lucky because they cashed out when banks brought the assets back on-balance sheet. Others were lucky, but it was bad luck. Worse yet, over the past several years, Wall Street brought Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) to Main Street. They were sold as a higher-yield substitute for safe money market funds. Small investors were stuffed with over $330 billion of ARSs invested in longer term tax-exempt municipal bonds, preferred stock, and student loans. They were told they would have ready-access to their money without loss, for a small pick-up in yield. But when the auctions failed, many unsuspecting people (who thought they had a simple money-market fund) found out their money was locked away and couldn’t be touched. Who knows how long they’ll have to wait before they can get their cash. Main Street has met Mean Street. The moral of the story is you just can’t always fund long-term assets safely with short-term hot money. I estimate that investors in the Hedge Funds, SIVs and ARSs, mentioned above, have already been denied access to close to $1 trillion dollars that they thought was readily available cash they could withdraw on short-notice. Total losses have yet to be determined, but being denied access to your cash can feel devastating even if there is a chance you can make some of it back in the future. Holding cash is like having an umbrella for a rainy day. For those misled by a trusted broker, the umbrella is now broken just in time for monsoon season. Unfortunately, what’s done is done and you can’t look back and undo what has happened, but the government taxpayer bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the government takeover of IndyMac Bank, should be a wake-up call. The worst problems in the financial markets aren’t over; they’re just getting started. These failures are huge events, and the smoke signals they created suggest there are many more financial fires around. Many banks will fail! Some large and medium-sized broker/dealers and finance companies are likely to be merged out, or file for bankruptcy. So, what can you do to protect your money? The FDIC offers iron-clad insurance up to $100,000 per account. If you have a lot of money, spread it around between different banks. For individuals and companies with a lot more than a few hundred thousand dollars, a large portion of the cash should be held in a money-market fund that only invests in short-term US Treasuries. If you are a small investor and like to keep money safe for a little longer – and don’t particularly like the rates offered on bank CDs – think about buying I-Bonds from the US Treasury. The Treasury is now limiting the purchase of I-Bonds to only $10,000 a year per person. It used to be that the Treasury allowed you to purchase $30,000 per year per person, but they now want to try and keep money in the banks. I-Bonds pay the CPI which, of course, underestimates the true rate of inflation and guarantees you will be robbed by the government, but you’ll receive a better rate of return than on a bank CD for the time being. (The current rate for an I-Bond is 4.84% through October 31 (Go to http://www.savingsbonds.gov). Most of us probably have our money safely tucked away, but don’t get caught napping in the middle of the afternoon. The failures tend to come in slow motion, and there are signs you should be watching for, such as: 1) if a bank shows up on a list of troubled banks, move fast (it only took 10 days for IndyMac Bank to fail); 2) if a bank, brokerage firm or finance company has a stock price of $10 a share or less, try and cut your exposure; 3) if the stock price is $5 or less, proceed as if the company’s’ days are numbered and get your money out; 4) if a bank or brokerage firm has publicly denied rumors more than three times, consider them desperate and run; and 5) if you ever hear a government official come out and say that an institution is fine, you know it’s time to get your money out because history shows they’re likely lying. Look what happened with Fannie and Freddie. The government said everything was fine right up to the day the US Treasury dropped the biggest government bailout of all time on the American taxpayer. The bill for Fannie, Freddie and the bank failures could cost the taxpayer over $400 billion. (That’s your money, of course.)http://www.sfgroup.org/Is%20Your%20Money%20Safe.htm

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

This financial crisis may end as it did in Argentina, when we had a complete run on our banks. People were not able to access their deposits, ("corralito"), and ultimately deposits were restructured into medium term bonds. US crash is very similar to Argentina´s crisis, it is like watching the same movie in slow motion.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:37 pm

"This financial crisis may end as it did in Argentina, when we had a complete run on our banks"It’s getting quite easy to see how that could happen. First, we have some US banks that have taken on a high number of questionable mortage assets (WaMu is one example right now). Then a bunch of hedge funds pile on the shares of these banks and take large short positions. Then, as the stock price plummets, more investors take short positions. Finally, as the stock gets to a low value people rush into the bank in a panic and withdraw all their money – because they fear the worst. It’s a bank manager’s worst nightmare. And it is playing out right now. In addition, there is a big problem in America today. Many people do not have much in savings. Families are living paycheck to paycheck. So … if someone decides to go down to the bank and take out all the dollars they have – it’s a practical thing to do. They may only be taking out a few hundred or a few thousand dollars. People may feel quite comfortable keeping a sum like that in a safe place at home. On the other hand, if most people had much larger savings then such a withdrawal would be more of a security problem (where could they put all the money)? So the fact that the US public has the worst savings rate in decades could actually add significant risk to bank runs occurring. As I said .. all of this is a bank manager’s worst nightmare.PeteCA

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:39 pm

"The Fed wants more power, but the Fed has proven that it can’t be trusted with the power it has,"that i agree. anyone saying otherwise is delusional.

SPQRJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:42 pm

I’m looking to take my profits for shorting the S&P, and putting them outside the USD. What is the best bet this late in the game? Gold, Intl bond funds?

ZarathustraJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:44 pm

@ KJ "When your house is on fire you don’t worry about the damage the fireman will do with his water hose; you just hope he can save your house from burning down to the ground!Well guess what, our house in on fire, and if you don’t let the firemen do their job there may be nothing left but a pile of ashes where the world’s sole superpower once stood. Especially when the firemen are trying to put out the flames with gasoline.

ZarathustraJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:46 pm

Sorry, that got messed up. Lets try again:When the house is rotting from the inside and was already falling down, and every few years you had to put massive amounts of money into it just to keep it standing, maybe you just watch it burn down and then build something new. Especially when the firemen are trying to put out the flames with gasoline.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 10:54 pm

Of course, things got really worse when Congress passed a law guranteeing that deposits where not to be seized. This law was read in it´s reverse, as a confession of vulnerability, and only accelerated the run on deposits. Watch if this script unfolds in the US…

AnonymousJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:10 pm

At least, the rotting house should not be used successfully as a fake charity pitch (more accurately a required donation!), getting people to send in what is left of their wealth to the fund to patch the house back up, while the charity’s managers steal the money and keep making the pitch …

garyalanJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:13 pm

Dr Roubini,I whole heartedly agree with your solution for the GSEs , the shareholders should lose 100%, the management should be canned, and the bond holders should take a haircut. This is what would happen with any other business in these circumstances. What I believe will actually happen is that the current corrupt gov’t officials will save their friends at taxpayer expense. This is a reflection of how corrupt our gov’t has become and how society has come to accept this type of behavior. The whole current proposal by Paulsen is outrageous, and to make the point of this, is the question "When can I start borrowing from the discount window? I can even draw up some worthless securities to swap in exchange for treasuries. "

AnonymousJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:26 pm

@garyalanOne of the major bondholders of these GSE’s are the chinese. If this is not High Treason, I do not know what is.

GuestJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:39 pm

The investment banks have no more allegiance to the USA than the country of China does. That is to say, none.But what are common people to do? We elected Democrats in 2006 to get out of Iraq, and those Democrats broke their word to us and voted to continue to authorize that war. It’s not a matter of accepting things. It’s a matter of having no power to change things within our system.Most Americans are decent reasonable people. Has America behaved decently and reasonably? Who runs the show?

kilgoresJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:46 pm

@ KJ Foehr 19:57:32For what it’s worth, as I’ve stated in previous posts, I think we’re lucky to have Bernanke in charge. He is doing his best to try to deal with a most difficult, if not unprecedented, situation. Again, it’s easy to criticize from the sidelines when you’re not the one with the fate of the American economy in your hands. That’s not to say that we should not be free to challenge Bernanke’s policy decisions, but only that we should refrain from personal attacks on him that he plainly does not deserve, given the awesome responsibility of his office.SWK

kilgoresJuly 15th, 2008 at 11:49 pm

@ randy 09:17:43I don’t think we’re in for a huge crash this time around. Rather, I suspect it will be more akin to a protracted, agonizingly slow period of grinding down of the economy.SWK

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:03 am

SWK: agree regarding Bernanke. I suspect he’s a reasonably good man. But there is little to be done, at least from his standpoint. Or maybe he didn’t account adequately for the massive proliferation of information which makes this round different from the 1930′s.I think we’re in for a protracted, agonizing decline. But there’s not much light at the end of the tunnel, unless the untenable existing web of contracts is somehow nullified. This is what the senior members of the system (including Bernanke) are resisting, but there is no possible renaissance until that occurs.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:04 am

Talking about wishing for something:"So choose your poison: a little socialism now or a whole lot more later."@ KJ Foehr on 2008-07-15 19:57:32The problem is that you sacrifice your magnificent Constitution and Bill of Rights (USA) for "a little socialism" and then a little bit more and then something else and then a little bit more and then something else until what? and when?When does it stop and where does it lead to? Why not defend what you have been given by your founding fathers, known to be the greatest system of government ever constructed?Read The Gulag Archipelago (Russian: Архипелаг ГУЛАГ) by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn because this is where the USA is being eagerly taken today.Ho humPeterJB

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:11 am

@SWKI beg to differ. Any government apparachik, especially one in as powerful a position as Bernacke who bold face lies to the American people repeatedly about the state of the economy and the true nature of these bailouts because his masters require him do so is a co-conspirator and deserving of our wrath. He is to the economy what "Brownie" was to Katrina

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:33 am

@ Guest 00:11.12That’s just silly. Bernanke, like many others, may have failed to perceive the danger early on, but accusing him of lying is simply over the top. He’s certainly no Brownie. His comments must be carefully circumscribed to avoid instigating panic and exacerbating an already bad situation.SWK

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:38 am

@ Peter JB 00:04:13Why do you assume socialism to be incompatible with the Constitution (including the Bill of Rights, which are simply the first ten amendments to it)? SWK

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:49 am

@ Anonymous 00:42:09If you think I need help, then why don’t you try to provide it to me? Why don’t you respond by demonstrating why my statement is wrong, rather than with a logically fallacious ad hominem argument? I’m all ears…SWK

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:02 am

@SWKDefinition of Socialism:social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources. According to the socialist view, individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one another. Furthermore, everything that people produce is in some sense a social product, and everyone who contributes to the production of a good is entitled to a share in it. Society as a whole, therefore, should own or at least control property for the benefit of all its members.Now the bill of rights:Bill of Rights Amendment ICongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. No Socialism here!Amendment IIA well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. No Socialism here!Amendment IIINo soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. No Socialism here!Amendment IVThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Hmm..No Socialism here!Amendment VNo person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Again,..No Socialism here!Amendment VIIn all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Wow,..No Socialism here!Amendment VIIIn suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. No Socialism here!Amendment VIIIExcessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. No Socialism here!Amendment IXThe enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. No Socialism here!Amendment XThe powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Finally, No Socialism here!Looks incompatible to me,..now be gone. This is not France.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:31 am

SEC issues emergency rule to curb short saleshttp://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080716/bs_nm/sec_shortselling_dcWASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) – U.S. securities regulators issued an emergency rule on Tuesday to limit certain types of short selling in major financial firms, including Fannie Mae (FNM.N) and Freddie Mac (FRE.N).The rule will go into effect on Monday, July 21, and last through July 29, although it could be extended to last up to 30 days. The SEC said it will consider rules to address short selling issues across the entire stock market.The emergency rule applies to 19 financial firms including Lehman Brothers (LEH.N), Goldman Sachs (GS.N), Merrill Lynch (MER.N), Morgan Stanley (MS.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Citigroup Inc (C.N).The SEC said that a loss of confidence in markets can lead to panic selling, which may be further exacerbated by certain types of short selling.Short sellers arrange to borrow shares they consider overvalued and sell them in hopes of making profit when the price drops.With financial stocks dropping dramatically over the year, lawmakers have been calling on the SEC to investigate whether short sellers and speculators are behind the move.The agency’s rule change would prevent investors from making "naked" short sales of the biggest financial stocks. A "naked" short sale occurs when an investor sells stock that has not yet been borrowed.Broker-dealers will sometimes accidentally fail to deliver stocks to investors who have arranged to borrow a stock. If it is done intentionally, it is illegal.Short sellers say they prevent stocks from becoming overvalued and are an essential feature of the market."While no one in Washington did their job, now they are trying to blame short sellers," said William Fleckenstein, president of Fleckenstein Capital, which manages a Seattle-based hedge fund."Short sellers don’t make stocks go down. If a short seller was trying to push a stock to a price where it didn’t belong, it would come back right away," said Fleckenstein, who is not currently short the investment banks or Fannie or Freddie. He had a short position on Fannie, which he covered on Tuesday.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:51 am

"Why do you assume socialism to be incompatible with the Constitution (including the Bill of Rights, which are simply the first ten amendments to it)?"SWK@ kilgores on 2008-07-16 00:38:11?Ho humPeterJB

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:54 am

@ Anonymous 01:02:48That’s better. Now my response to the assertions you have raised:>Definition of Socialism:>social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources. Well, assuming this definition to be true for the sake of argument, the U.S. government owns a heck of a lot of property and natural resources, as to the respective governments of the 50 states. In fact, the U.S. Constitution, and that of virtually every state (if not all of them), recognizes the power of eminent domain, that is, the power of the government to seize property as long as just compensation is provided. That is a fundamental, organic feature of our constitutional form of government that fully supports the notion of collective ownership of property. I would suggest that the U.S. Constitution is not the pure guardian of private property rights that you imagine it to be.>According to the socialist view, individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one another. Surely you don’t disagree with the assertion that individuals do not live or work in isolation but live in cooperation with one another. That is the very essence of society.>Furthermore, everything that people produce is in some sense a social product, and everyone who contributes to the production of a good is entitled to a share in it. Don’t you feel entitled to share in some way in the benefits of the products or services you are called on to provide through your gainful employment? I fully expect that, myself. But I also expect to be taxed for the public welfare so we can have roads, bridges, water utilities, etc.>Society as a whole, therefore, should own or at least control property for the benefit of all its members.There are many varieties of socialism. Not all advocate absolute and unbridled collective ownership of all property whatsoever. To the extent that’s what you’re talking about, I would agree with you. The U.S. Constitution and the constitutions of many or all or our states expressly recognize and broadly protect the right to private property, though that right is not, as I’ve pointed out, absolute either.___As for your analysis of the Bill of Rights, allow me to point out that each of these ten amendments to the Constitution merely delimits the powers delegated to the federal government by the People and the States. The Bill of Rights is a document of reservation, not a document that grants anything. None of these amendments states or implies that socialism — or as you have characterized it, the "public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources" — is in any way prohibited from being exercised by the federal government. If the government takes your property (or for that matter, your life or liberty), of course, it has to afford you due process of law and equal protection of the law, but take from you it can nonetheless. Interestingly, the tenth amendment, which reserves to the States powers not delegated to the federal government, actually preserves the right of individual states to practice socialism.If I were you, I would not be disparaging the French, either. Without their intervention at Yorktown, we likely would not have won our independence and the right to promulgate the Constitution and establish the Republic. I will not "be gone" simply because you don’t care for what I have to say. I am an American, and like you, I say what I damn well please, as is my right under the First Amendment.SWK

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:11 am

im not into the tinfoil hat community,but something strange happened today in the internet have you ever/seen a whacky conspiration website named RENSE, its a very popular website for crazy Cons-theories,the website is now offline/closed!!its strange,i believe the site is full of disinfo,but why shut it down

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:39 am

"I saw the punctuation, but what is the question? ;-) "SWK@ kilgores on 2008-07-16 01:56:45I didn’t understand the question :-) >Ho humPeterJB

Not too big to FlailJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:28 am

Terrifying! Four horsemen of the Apocalypse: inflation, asset implosion, unemployment, recessionhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=794289610&play=1

quintumJuly 16th, 2008 at 5:28 am

"@ Guest 00:11.12That’s just silly. Bernanke, like many others, may have failed to perceive the danger early on, but accusing him of lying is simply over the top. He’s certainly no Brownie. His comments must be carefully circumscribed to avoid instigating panic and exacerbating an already bad situation.SWKWritten by kilgores on 2008-07-16 00:33:17"one might think that replying to somebody’s argument "That’s just silly" is neither necessarily the most constructive approach nor the basis for a polite exchange of views…IMO not agreeing with somebody doesn’t give the right to label his opinion as silly especially when the subject in question is debatable and subjective(Bernanke’s attitude). that’s how you start a flame…

AfAJuly 16th, 2008 at 5:54 am

I think that the discussion about socialism is totally misplaced. I surely have nothing against socialism and, given where we are now, I think it is an ideal. I hate to argue about ideologies because they are just a waste of time, you cannot be right or wrong and a good reason for unwarranted personal attacks.Now to Bernanke and Paulson. They are, and the administration that they represent, are either blatant liars or completely incompetent, there is no other choice. And either of these two means they do not deserve their positions. It is unimaginable to me that the head of the central bank did not see the upcoming crises long after it all started while others, disposing of much less information, predicted this outcome for years. It is unimaginable for me that a treasury who is calling for "strong dollar" is not doing ANYTHING to support it (hell, they are doing everything that can push it down). I can understand that both men are in a very difficult spot where any decision has tremendous negative effects, and that they just inherited the situation. But for God sake, their mission is to make sound and long term policies not day trading the country. I am focusing on these two first because they are unelected officials whose decisions impact our lives more than those of the president himself, and second because this is what we are debating (Congress and US bear a larger responsability)"Puting moral hazard aside". We cannot possibly put moral hazard aside under any pretext, even for emergency of action. Besides, what kind of emergency does buying equity provide? Roubini provided the OPTIMAL solution to nationalize the GSE’s and significantly reduce moral hazard. A solution that might be implemented faster than Paulson’s plan. Why not adopt it? Is he the only smart man around here? So we go back to the first question, they are either lying (and have a different agenda) or incompetent.Puting all this aside. We have a secretary of Treasury whose mission is to "keep" a strong dollar and "manage" the country’s finances (treasuries). And we have a head of Central Bank whose mission is to promote economic growth and price stability in addition to an oversight over the banking system. Both know (as anyone who ever opened an economics book does) that providing unlimited liquidity to banks and throwing bailout after bailout (none of which is their mission) destroys the dollar, puts the country’s finances (treasuries) in jeopardy, unleashes a global inflationary spiral and, more importantly, which they (should) know does not solve the problem they are fighting; credit crunch caused by reckless lending (where was the Fed before yesterday?) and insolvent banks, instead of forcing them to deleverage and mark-to-market when appropriate. Bernanke is talking about the increasing risk of inflation, but he should have known what was waiting before starting his rate cuts. He is again talking about how there was no much downside risk for the economy and refuses to raise rates (well, everybody knows that he said that only to fight rising ‘inflation expectations’). He also said before he started all his alphabet soup, that all was ‘temporary’ and then extends it for one more year. I am forgetting many more. As the saying goes, if we put a monkey deciding for our economy, it would have a much better track record in this relatively short period.But that is not what I am worried about. I am worried to see what a few sour vintages of ‘subprime’ mortgages have done to the global economy, and try to imagine what other prime and commercial RE, auto loans, student loans … will have as an effect. I am worried about the tons of government liabilities that are soon coming due. I am worried about millions of retired people who will soon realize they do not have a dime in their savings and would not receive any Security or Care they were counting on. I am worried about billions owed to foreigners. I am worried about the quadrillion dollars of derivatives. I am worried about Lehman who goes to cry for bailout at the Fed and then plans to open a global unregulated stock exchange …It is not about moral hazard anymore. It is about the fact that any additional dime the government adds to its liabilities and every treasury the Fed "lends" to so-called liquidity strapped banks to finance our misery and everyday that goes without the SEC and FDIC ENFORCING regulations and forcing banks and companies to come clean, just pushes us closer to the day of reckoning. I am not sure that day will come, or at least, that these days will come at once, but there is something called risk management and contingency planning. USA is a very poor country now, it cannot afford anything as it did before. How can we possibly think that we are taking a ‘cost/benefit’ approach to judge any plan without taking into consideration the imapct of that plan on the ‘yield curve’. We are worrying about equity markets (after a mere 20% drop) and we forget where treasuries are heading (even without any bailouts). Treasuries on which everything else is priced, so even if they don’t collapse, they will make everyone upside down on their mortgages. We are worrying about few banks/agencies going bust and we don’t worry about dismantling that collossal dinosaur of derivatives.I am afraid Equity (in its original meaning) cannot be bailed."Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius — and a lot of courage — to move in the opposite direction." "Weakness of attitude becomes weakness of character.""Sometimes one pays most for the things one gets for nothing.""We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.""Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the the universe.""In order to form an immaculate member of a flock of sheep one must, above all, be a sheep." [out of context]Alber Einstein

tutterfrutJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:10 am

The final attack on European financials has really started now. Very soon the ECB will have to take over the (di)stress situation from the FED. Will they be up to the task? We’ll soon find out…

quintumJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:18 am

that’s how the wizard of Oz got his free lunch…he inflated his hot air baloon, did some sleight of hand tricks and paid the bill for the goodies with the taxpayer’s credit card.carefull though, the wizard might still get an indigestion even if the meal is all paid for with somebody else’s money…what if the bank (i.e. the rest of the world) decides to cut the credit on the card?

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:37 am

AfA: "Now to Bernanke and Paulson. They are… either blatant liars or completely incompetent"I’d go with both.Seriously SWK, I respect you, but it is clear that Hanky and Benny are telling stories they don’t believe themselves and have no idea how to deal with the situation if not in the very short term. November is the objective, nothing else matters, but it looks soooo distant right now.

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:56 am

The deepest risk, and the most hidden -The darkest, ultimate, most unspoken risk, is that of the corrupt US legal system, and legal ruses increasingly being used to confiscate assets.The parallel to the 2.3 million US prisoners (1 out of every 45 working-age US males behind bars!), is the case-by-case confiscation of individual assets via the US mafia of lawyers and judges.There is nothing like it elsewhere in the world. These asset confiscations are hidden by the US mass media, and by the destruction and silencing of independent bloggers who try to expose this. Victims are always smeared and slandered as ‘disgruntled litigants’, and those who try to expose specific cases are shut down by intimidation of US lawyers tied to the judges.I came to know many victims of the US system, and almost no one ever helped them – no lawyer, no media – while they lost life savings and homes to the legal mafia. Meanwhile, most US people are blind, unless they personally know a victim. Most believe in the Hollywood movie myths of ‘lawyers’ and ‘justice’, which turn out to be a fraud if you see a US courtroom at work.The US judges are the deepest partners of the banksters, and even more corrupt. The mass seizure of US assets via the legal mafia is the next phase. – Everyone should consider getting yourselves out of the USA, your assets ahead of you.When I drove across the US border the last time, I had a few gold Maple Leaf coins in my pocket, but my yellow Swiss bank card was the best ‘gold’ of all.

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:56 am

@ quintum 05:28:52Well, it wasn’t my intention to flame anyone. I didn’t attack the poster personally. I never intend to cause offense to anyone on this board. The poster’s comment did strike me as silly (I could have described it as sophomoric hyperbole, but I thought silly would be less provocative).SWK

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:07 am

@ Alessandro 06:37:21Thank you, Alessandro. I always enjoy reading your posts.I think you’ve hit the nail on the head here. They are in a crisis and are just doing what they can to keep the cork from blowing off the champagne bottle. I continue to maintain that they are not lying, but very carefully choosing their words so as to avoid exacerbating the crisis by precipitating a panic. Imagine what would happen if Dr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson came on camera and said something like, "Things are far more serious than we ever imagined and we’re very scared that we may be unable to contain this crisis. I wish we had listened to Dr. Rounini!" I can’t think of a faster way to cause a stampede to the bottom globally than to have the two guys who are more or less responsible for overseeing and managing the world’s largest economy spew their guts in public. They have to be circumspect, less they become the catalysts for chaos and lose any prospect of keeping the financial system from falling over the edge of a cliff.SWK

MatthiasJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:07 am

All this blabla about socialism..Barry Ritholtz nails it.excerpt from "Idiots Fiddle While Rome Burns":That’s not capitalism, its not socialism, its not regulation, and its sure as hell isn’t what free markets are. Our language is insufficient to describe this hodge-podge system, other than to call it a random patchwork of quasi-capitalism, quadrennial-socialism, and politics as usual. Ideological idiocy is the only phrase I can muster that has any resonance with the daily insanity.And thats it.

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:21 am

@ PeterJB 02:39:24> I didn’t understand the question :-) >Perhaps I’m the one who didn’t understand what you were saying in the first place. You said in an earlier post:>The problem is that you sacrifice your magnificent Constitution and Bill of Rights (USA) for "a little socialism" and then a little bit more and then something else and then a little bit more and then something else until what? and when?>When does it stop and where does it lead to? Why not defend what you have been given by your founding fathers, known to be the greatest system of government ever constructed?>Read The Gulag Archipelago (Russian: Архипелаг ГУЛАГ) by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn because this is where the USA is being eagerly taken today.Hence, it appeared to me that you were suggesting socialism was somehow inherently incompatible with the Constitution and its Bill of Rights. As the interim posts following my question to you make clear, some folks apparently take umbrage with the mere suggestion that socialism and the Constitution may not necessarily be incompatible. I found interesting your comment about reaction to crisis:>It is predictable that the incompetent true-believers will always revert to uber-control mechanisms when their station is in jeopardy – from "USA good old Democracy" (which everyone must have or face death) onto communism, socialism, fascism etc., etc., onward christian soldiers, blah blah, blah, to war and destruction.That is very insightful. An unstable economy makes everything else unstable (e.g., Germany in the 1920s, Zimbabwe today) . Excellent admonition.SWK

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:23 am

@ Matthias 07:07:34Great exerpt. In the final analysis, labels don’t really mean much of anything, do they?SWK

Prt1stAskQLaterJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:26 am

Prof. Roubini wrote: But over time inflation will be the last problem that the Fed will have to face as a severe US recession and global slowdown will lead to a sharp reduction in inflationary pressures in the U.S.Dear Prof. Roubini, Thank you for the fact-based bleeding edge insight all along. There is a tone of finality in your post. Game Over. I win! A few posters like KJ and SWK are begining to realise that we should not cut off our own nose. Here’s what he writes:KJ Foehr on 2008-07-15 19:57:32 wrote: Well guess what, our house in on fire, and if you don’t let the firemen do their job there may be nothing left but a pile of ashes where the world’s sole superpower once stood.KJ,Glad you finally get it. We’ll end up having half a house while Rest of World will be rendered with ashes. That’s Alpha! Cheers to Alpha. Cheers to US. No country will dare play currency based human resource arbitrage games with US again! As long as the US does not default we are OK. That’s why the US Government stands behind the GSEs. You would need to militarily defeat a country to give it a greater than zero probability of default. Argentina, Germany and France have previously attained that infamy.@kilgores on 2008-07-16 01:54:17 wrote:I am an American, and like you, I say what I damn well please, as is my right under the First Amendment.Ditto.Print First Ask Questions Later.

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:39 am

@ Afa>I can understand that both men are in a very difficult spot where any decision has tremendous negative effects, and that they just inherited the situation. And I reiterate, it’s easy to criticize when you’re not the one in the hot seat. Of course, I would have a hard time extending this notion to the current President, the Vice President, and certain members of the Administration who arrogantly and incestuously and unwisely exercised their great powers in contravention of basic constitutional and human rights principles and have left our country in near shambles. I just can’t put Dr. Bernanke and Mr. Paulson into that category, although I can understand why one would question or criticize certain of their responses to the crisis as ineffectual or likely to produce other problems down the line. I don’t think in their case it’s about a personal grab for power so much as it is trying to keep the lid on the bubbling and potentially explosive cauldron of the economy.That’s my own view. Others here have, and will continue to, draw very different conclusions and make very different assessments…SWK

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:45 am

@SWKI (respectfully ;) ) disagree. Sure they are choosing the words carefully and we can argue wether they actually lied or just let the other misunderstand, and you are a lawyer so you are probably going to beat me on the head.But still, Marvyn King said that things were tough long ago and went on with a stright nationalization when one of his bank blew off. Great Britain didn’t collapse on his words and on his acts.What Hank and Ben are doing instead is IMHO morally criminal, they choose their words in the way that make as much people as possible leave their pension money as long as possible into the collapsing financial system. And this is done intentionally to let their friends position themselves (IMO).And they are clearly not addressing any real problem of the real economy. Not a single one. They just try to move the pain to come one day into the future every day.As you can guess I’m sick of TPTB.

FRIEND OF WASH MUTUALJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:46 am

Diamonds Attract Funds as Largest Gem Prices Surge 76% in YearBy Scott ReyburnEnlarge Image/DetailsJuly 15 (Bloomberg) — Diamonds, like art, are a commodity that is gaining attention as an alternative investment.Increases in the price of the rarest colorless and colored diamonds are attracting wealthy investors and structured funds as stock markets and real-estate values decline.The price of 5-carat gems with the potential to be sold at $1 million or more has risen 76.5 percent in the year to May 2008, according to http://www.idexonline.com, the Web site of the International Diamond and Jewelry Exchange.“There’s a group of very savvy, tremendously wealthy people who have put a small portion of their fortunes aside to invest in diamonds,” said Francois Graff, managing director of London- based Graff Diamonds International, in a telephone interview. “They’ve made incredible returns.”Five years ago, dealers were paying $70,000 per carat for colorless diamonds of 10 carats and more, said Graff.“Now we’re paying over $200,000 per carat,” he said.There are only about 200 highest-grade, D-flawless colorless diamonds of more than 5 carats discovered per year, according to Raymond Sancroft-Baker, Christie’s International’s European director of jewelry. The annual yield of large-scale blue and pink stones is considerably smaller.“Diamonds are getting rarer. The earth just isn’t giving them up,” said Sancroft-Baker in a telephone interview.The commodity asset-management firm Diapason Commodities Management SA listed a specialist investment fund, Diamond Circle Capital Plc, on the London Stock Exchange on June 25. Diapason did not immediately respond to e-mailed requests for comment.Public ListingDiamond Circle Capital is the first publicly listed fund to invest in rare colored and colorless diamonds, according to International Diamond and Jewelry Exchange’s Web Site.The fund, which in June 2007 was due to have a $400 million start-up, raised $74.32 million through its initial public offering, said the Web site.“Over the last 12 months, the best pink and blue diamonds have increased in price between 75 and 100 percent,” said the New York diamond dealer Alan Bronstein in an interview.Bronstein’s Aurora Collection of 296 colored diamonds is currently on loan to the Natural History Museum in London.“These are some of the rarest and most colorful things in the world,” said Bronstein, whose diamonds are specimen examples of less than 3 carats.Rarity Value“They used to be viewed as curiosities,” said Joanna Hardy, senior specialist at Sotheby’s jewelry department in London. “Now buyers are taking colored diamonds much more seriously. People want to have something different. And they value rarity.”In May, the Codium Fund, specializing in investing in colored diamonds of at least 1 carat, was to be launched in the Netherlands Antilles with a target investment of $100 million, Arab Times said on its Web site.Over the last five years, managers of art-investment funds, which buy and sell a pool of works for a set management fee and a share of any profit made, have been keen to promote art as an alternative asset class. So far, the Fine Art Fund, started in 2004, is the only one of these vehicles that has remained conspicuously active in the West.Individual Choice“The diamond market, like the art market, is based on individual transactions,” said Graff, whose father Laurence is a bidder at many Sotheby’s and Christie’s contemporary-art auctions. “The wealthy don’t need to invest in funds. They can just pick up a telephone and buy the things for themselves.”Graff said that within the last three months he has sold a D-flawless, emerald-cut colorless diamond of 243.96 carats to an Asian buyer for in excess of 50 million pounds ($99.6 million). “There were quite a few people ready to buy that stone,” said Graff, who has placed a similar price on a flawless 20-carat fancy deep-blue diamond.The record for any gemstone sold at auction is the $16.5 million with fees paid for the 100.1-carat “Star of the Season” pear-shaped colorless diamond at Sotheby’s, Geneva in May 1995, according to Sotheby’s.“When stock markets go down, it’s always good for us,” said Hardy. “People with a lot of surplus cash turn to something more tangible.” Sotheby’s was selling diamonds to buyers from a record number of countries, Hardy said.“We’ve got a lot of customers from the Middle East, Russia and the Ukraine. And there are more buyers from Europe than America at the moment,” she said.Hardy does not expect prices for large-scale colored and colorless stones to fall within the next six months.“It’s not as if there are suddenly going to be more of them,” she said.(Scott Reyburn writes about the art market for Bloomberg News. Opinions expressed are his own.)To contact the reporter on this story: Scott Reyburn in London at sreyburn@hotmail.com.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:52 am

LOLOLOL Global markets plummet overnight, CPI come out at its worst level in 26 years, Phony and Fraudy cut dividends to save cash and somehow, miraculously, US futures markets turn positive!!!!

Prt1stAskQLaterJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:59 am

FRIEND OF WASH MUTUAL on 2008-07-16 07:46:07 wrote:Increases in the price of the rarest colorless and colored diamonds are attracting wealthy investors and structured funds as stock markets and real-estate values decline.Diamonds or Tulips? See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_maniaThe most spectacular and highly sought-after tulip bulbs would grow flowers with vivid colors, lines, and flames on the petals as a result of being infected with a tulip-specific virus known as the "Tulip Breaking potyvirus", a type of mosaic virus.I can eat infected tulips if I have to. Can you eat diamonds?Sigh! Here we go again … These lemmings just won’t let me quit. ROFL (after a looong time!)Print First Ask Questions Later.

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:08 am

@ Anonymous 06:56:07>The darkest, ultimate, most unspoken risk, is that of the corrupt US legal system…>Most believe in the Hollywood movie myths of ‘lawyers’ and ‘justice’, which turn out to be a fraud if you see a US courtroom at work….What is corrupt here is not the legal system, but the ideas you have expressed about it. This is the most ignorant post I have seen on this blog in a long time. It is the sort of childish rant typically made by self-righteous persons destitute of knowledge and education sufficient to appreciate and respect our institutions of law, in the absence of which personal liberty would have no defense. The legal system you criticize so freely is the sole check that protects the minority from the potential tyranny of the majority in a democracy. This sort of nonsense has plagued Anglo-American jurisprudence since the time of Shakespeare: "The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers." (Henry VI, Part II).When I read comments such as yours, I am reminded of this scene from A Man for All Seasons:Sir Thomas More– There’s no law against that.William Roper– God’s law!Sir Thomas More– Then God can arrest him.William Roper– While you talk, he’s gone!Sir Thomas More– Go he should, if he were the Devil, until he broke the law.William Roper– Now you give the Devil benefit of law!Sir Thomas More– Yes, what would you do?William Roper– Cut a road through the law to get after the Devil? Yes. I’d cut down every law in England to do that.Sir Thomas More– And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned on you……where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?This country is planted thick with laws from coast to coast……Man’s laws, not God’s, and if you cut them down……and you’re just the man to do it……do you really think you could stand upright in the wind that would blow then?Yes. I give the Devil benefit of law for my own safety’s sake.____When you find your perfect society beyond U.S. shores, I hope you will remember to check back in with us and let us know just where that place is…SWK

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:15 am

@ Alessandro 07:45:53Good point on Mervyn King. One thing about which I will certainly agree with you, and that is that we need a few more folks with the moral integrity and the intestinal fortitude to speak their honest opinions, to disagree with their superiors, and to resign, if necessary, as a matter of principle. If a few folks had done that in the Bush Administration, we might have taken a very different course in Iraq, a different course with respect to the Hurricane Katrina mess, a different course with respect to torture policies, a different course with respect to environmental protection, and yes, perhaps even a different course with respect to the economy.SWKSWK

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:22 am

Dear Dr. Roubini:You have really created one of the best, most intellectually stimulating blogs around. There are so many interesting perspectives expressed here. I continue to learn so much here, even from those with whom I disagree and even from some expressions of views that I find absurd and baseless. This is a wonderful public service, and I feel compelled once again to offer you my deepest appreciation for providing this forum to us.Kindest personal regards,SWK

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:49 am

UH-OH!!SEC subpoenas Goldman, others over Lehman, Bear stock moves: reportBy MarketWatchLast update: 9:44 a.m. EDT July 16, 2008

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:55 am

Anyone notice the miraculous positive Industrial production revisions from January forward that just happens to reverse YOY production to positive once again??

iwwJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:58 am

Last time the CPI and PPI were this bad, the FF rate was 3.50 and rising!Written by Guest on 2008-07-16 08:53:10From the Big Picture blog:Whilst Bernanke took centre stage, macro data showed the increasing problems we face. Producer prices rose by 9.2% y/y, the highest by quite a margin since July 1981 when U.S. interest rates were still at 15.5%.

RealtorJuly 16th, 2008 at 9:20 am

News UPDATE NEWS UPDATEBased on my latest research just completed, most US homes are built with drywalls and wood. My research shows that these are the cheapest material you can come up with in the US. End of report……

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 9:23 am

Brian Wesbury was on CNBC last night saying his estimate of Q2 GDP was "well over 3%". The official numbers are not allowed to be negative anymore so sayeth teh USSR (United States Socialist Republic)

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 9:32 am

Real 10 year treasury yields are at their 3rd worst negative spread since 1953. The only other periods worse than today wer 1974 and 1980…

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 9:56 am

CONFUSION AT INDYMAC FUELS CUSTOMER’S ANGERThe LA Times is running a story this morning that everyone here should be aware of. This is not going to make you feel to good about your money in the banking system. I’ll type in a few of the important sentences from the article. Meanwhile … now you can see why lines of people at IndyMac are getting bent out of shape …"Depositors of failed IndyMac Bank endured long waits in the summer heat for a second day on Tuesday, with crowds becoming irate at several branches … Banking experts warned that the chaotic scnese risked touching off runs on other banks … The FDIC took over IndyMac late Friday and assured depositors that accounts with $100,000 held in a single name or $250,000 in a retirement account are safe. … But many customers have said that when they checked their blances online, tens of thousands of dollars appeared to be missing. And when they went to branches to investigate, they encountered lines hundreds of people deep and unhelpful staff members. "continuing on later page …"Todd Bash, a 43 year old teacher from San Gabriel, was worried about IndyMac’s viability … On July 8 he had been ready to pull his funds but the teller [at IndyMac] told him that if he added extra beneficiaries [to his bank account] then he would get extra insurance [extra coverage from the FDIC]. … But after IndyMac was seized an FDIC hotline operator said the extra insurance wasn’t necessarily valid. "Poof.Tens of thousands of dollars disappearing up in smoke from these accounts.PeteCA

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 9:58 am

The US Treasury is running out of time before foreign patience snaps, writes Ambrose Evans PritchardMerrill Lynch has warned that the United States could face a foreign "financing crisis" within months as the full consequences of the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgage debacle spread through the world.Draining away: The US may struggle to plug its capital gap The country depends on Asian, Russian and Middle Eastern investors to fund much of its $700bn (£350bn) current account deficit, leaving it far more vulnerable to a collapse of confidence than Japan in the early 1990s after the Nikkei bubble burst. Britain and other Anglo-Saxon deficit states could face a similar retreat by foreign investors."Japan was able to cut its interest rates to zero," said Alex Patelis, Merrill’s head of international economics."It would be very difficult for the US to do this. Foreigners will not be willing to supply the capital. Nobody knows where the limit lies."

PRWJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:02 am

@SWK 2008-07-16 08:15:48"Good point on Mervyn King. One thing about which I will certainly agree with you, and that is that we need a few more folks with the moral integrity and the intestinal fortitude to speak their honest opinions, to disagree with their superiors, and to resign, if necessary, as a matter of principle."I’m afraid you are over-estimating our Mervyn. He (correctly)wanted to let Northern Rock go bust. He was over-ruled by the politicians and did not resign. Large amounts of public money are being poured into an insolvent bank, part of which goes to reimburse shareholders, and more to the bank’s creditors (mostly other banks). No more edifying than Bear Stearns or Fannie and Freddie, just a slightly different mechanism

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:06 am

Shares of Wells Fargo (WFC: 25.66, +5.15, +25.1%) rose 22.4%, rallying after the San Francisco-based bank raised its dividend as it reported a 23% decline in second-quarter profit, milder than analyst had been anticipating.I cant hear this better than expected shit anymore.Who is buying this crap?Pension funds or what?All this "Investors" propably total idiots.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:11 am

massive short covering in the financials! $BKX up over 10% now…there you have it, US crisis now over. Get long or get left behind…

CaponeJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:02 am

@Guest on 2008-07-16 01:31:06,Thanks for this info. So, ban short selling throughout the Olympics ? Excellent ! What is the complete list of 19 financial firms ?This combined with the psuedo-rate cut of oil being down $10 in 2 days and the S&P is up 8 pts and the DOW 100 ? Hmmm. This looks like a save the July option SELLERS a few bucks with increasing potential for August to roll on down to the next lows…

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:15 am

@ PRW 10:02:57Well, right, he didn’t resign, but he did advocate letting Northern Rock go. Perhaps he figured his resignation would be less beneficial than trying to continue to work within the system after he was overruled. Often resignation would be the better way to go.My feeling is that Colin Powell would have had a greater and more constructive impact on the course of U.S. involvement in the Iraq war had he resigned in protest, but good soldier that he was (never quite got the hang of transitioning to civilian status), he elected to stay on and, in my view, was more or less ineffectual after that, if not becoming an enabler for the misguided policies of the Administration. By contrast, Admiral Fallon recently resigned as head of CENTCOM, I suspect, due to what I imagine to have been his opposition to the Bush Administration’s approach to Iran. So far, at least, we haven’t gone to war around the Straits of Hormuz.SWK

Play OnJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:20 am

If oil closes down $4 today and gaps down tomorrow another $2 they will rally the S&P to 1270!

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:27 am

Dear Professor:Nicolas Burns is coming to Geneva this weekend, and his mission is to restate the precondition of Stopping Uranium Enrichment. We already know that Khamenei will not accept this precondition. Will his return with this restatement by Khamenei be a green light for the Israeli? Is the SEC action to limit naked shorting from July 21 to August 20 on all investment banks and GSEs related?

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:31 am

This shows you just how perverse things have become:12:22 p.m.Investors cheer billion-dollar losses at AMR, Delta

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:46 am

(Reuters) – U.S. securities regulators issued an emergency rule on Tuesday to limit certain types of short selling in major financial firms, including Fannie Mae (FNM.N) and Freddie Mac (FRE.N)…. The emergency rule applies to 19 financial firms including Lehman Brothers (LEH.N), Goldman Sachs (GS.N), Merrill Lynch (MER.N), Morgan Stanley (MS.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Citigroup Inc (C.N).The photographs of depositors standing in line at IndyMac Bank underscore the manipulation and the lies of U.S. government officials about the soundness of the banking system.Yes, those deposits are insured up to $100,000(+) and the people in line who have insured deposits, in this case, will get their money. But why aren’t they able to get their money without standing in line five or six hours, and some overnight? Have there been so many bank failures that the government can’t even arrive with enough money at IndyMac to pay off the depositors, or enough tellers to handle the job? Suppose several other big banks fail on the same day. It might be weeks, months (years?) before the full “faith and promise” of the federal government is realized.Not only have the investment banks been using their traditional mouthpieces — Bush, Paulson and Bernanke — but their potential losses are so staggering and so threatening, that they have now co-opted Chris Cox to stop realistic stock trading in their shares.Short selling has been the only window on the weakness of companies such as Lehman Brothers when most other data and information about the health of the stocks is obscured through the fuzzy regulations covering investment banks. The investment bankers are moving to protect their staggering losses and connections to debt leveraging throughout the world. The degree of their desperation is revealed by their co-option of the entire federal government to save themselves and by their refusal to allow marketing to go forward. Short selling is the release valve telling investors what’s happening with the stock. Short selling removes the camouflage that covers the health and capitalization of companies. Short selling leads to the weaknesses in companies such as Lehman, the companies that are in danger.Gamblers use camouflage to conceal their actions from the casino. Enough camouflage and no casino.

KJ FoehrJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:53 am

@LB, others who criticize the USA for currently being number one on the rate of prisoners list, and Anonymous on 2008-07-16 06:56:07“The parallel to the 2.3 million US prisoners (1 out of every 45 working-age US males behind bars!), is the case-by-case confiscation of individual assets via the US mafia of lawyers and judges.”There is nothing like it elsewhere in the world.”If you lived in the USA during the 1970s and 1980s, then you surely can appreciate how bad crime was during that time. If you weren’t then do a little research and you will find that in the ‘70s and ‘80s violent crime was so rampant that people were afraid to walk on city streets after dark, rape in parking garages in large cities was commonplace, muggers operated with impunity in NYC, no one dared park a car on NYC streets for even five minutes with any package or even a marginally valuable item visible inside the car, crime was so bad on NYC subways that Curtis Sliwa formed the Guardian Angels* and they patrolled the subways trying to keep people safe. Contributing to the high crime problem, judges routinely released on probation those convicted of robbery and burglary to the extent that criminals no longer feared punishment for their crimes. Prisoners were so commonly released on parole, only to commit other crimes, that it gave rise to some jurisdictions implementing laws like the famous “three strikes and your out” law in Washington and California, and other laws providing harsh punishment for crimes committed with a gun. Crime became the number one issue during many elections around the country. The situation became untenable and to change it serious consequences for criminal action had to be implemented within the justice system.Because of the high probation and parole situation in the ‘70s and ‘80s, I doubt that the USA was number one on the prisoner list, if such a list even existed then. IMO, the current high number of prisoners in the US is not the problem, it is a symptom. The real question is why do we have such a high rate of crime?A related issue: how reliable are these prison statistics?** For example, how accurate do you think the numbers are for China? Burma? Saudi Arabia? Zimbawe?And the numbers alone do not answer the important social questions: What is the rate of crime in a country? What social and cultural factors contribute to a country’s crime level? What is the strength of the rule of law that deals with those crimes? How fair is the judicial system in determining the guilt or innocence of those arrested? How many executions are committed and for which crimes? Etc.* The Guardian Angels is a non-profit, international, volunteer organization of unarmed citizen crime patrollers. The Guardian Angels organization was founded February 13, 1979 in New York City by Curtis Sliwa and has chapters in 11 countries (in over 100 cities) around the world.Sliwa originally created the organization to combat widespread violence and crime on the New York City subways. The organization originally trained members to make citizen’s arrests for violent crimes. The organization patrols the streets and neighborhoods but also provides education programs and workshops for schools and businesses.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardian_Angels** From the World Prison Population List (fourth edition)The List has a number of weaknesses. It lacks information on 17 independent countries and figures do not relate to the same date. Comparability is further compromised by different practice in different countries, for example with regard to whether all pre-trial detainees and juveniles are held under the authority of the prison administration, and also whether the prison administration is responsible for psychiatrically ill offenders and offenders being detained for treatment for alcoholism. People held in custody are usually omitted from national totals if they are not under the authority of the prison administration.http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/r188.pdfHaving said all that, I strongly agree that the recent uptrend in confiscations by police is outrageous, inexcusable, and all citizens should be alarmed and demand that the practice be closely monitored and tightly regulated. IMO, it is the latest example of a country that has become consumed by greed and degraded by a general decline in values and loss of respect for the basic right and wrong that any four-year-old knows.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:04 pm

Yup, shoudl be worth another 100 on the sow:1:00 p.m.All 3 components of home builders index hit record lows

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:16 pm

Home buliders data suggests higher inventories of new homes and lower building permits. Pretty soon, "they" are going to make it illegal to not buy houses in the US!

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:23 pm

I guess oil and the government taking over everything and making it illegal for things to go down or for people to be depressed or for people to lose trumps a housing depression…

CaponeJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

i actually witnessed the Guardian Angels in action last year on the subway train in Chicago coming back from a Sox game (free tickets – i am Cubs fan). i had seen the Angels wearing their shirts walking back and forth in between cars. all of the sudden, a man started yelling at a woman who was with her children in the car. i thought it was domestic in nature and they were related. the Angels showed up and a full train car watched as they confronted him, he would not listen, then pop right in the face cracked open the lip and bleeding. other angels rolled into the subway car and they pinned him in the corner by the door. the man said don’t beat me, you are gonna beat me. we stopped, they took him down at the next stop and what appeared to be a pummeling took place. it was very uneasy to see this. out of curiosity, i asked the woman a few stops later if she knew the guy. she said no, they had done a good thing and that guy had been smoking crack… i was nearly mugged personally on my front porch a few months back EARLY one morning after being out. Thanks for inflating crime into society again you greedy, ruthless bastards ! have fun keeping your own family and friends safe when they are in public ! a friend in NYC told me he keeps mug money ready at all times, somebody comes up to you, just hand it over and move on with it. it is an additional insurance or tax on people complements of the world’s banking cartel, the self-serving greedy wall street elite and perhaps most of all the DEBT gamers who have leveraged the world into near financial chaos through their hyperleveraged deals to generate their "wholesome," "pure profits." This has happened before. Why are we here again ?

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:38 pm

Correction on 11:46:33: I did not mean to attribute my statements to Reuters. I failed to put the Reuters’ statement regarding U.S securities in quotes and to attribute its source to Guest. My apologies to you and to Reuters.

randyJuly 16th, 2008 at 12:55 pm

WTF is making the stocks go up today????????????So wells Fargo lies about the profit and everyone actually believes it? Come on!!!!!!

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:03 pm

randy: "WTF is making the stocks go up today?"Option expiry on Friday? (I’m not sure, some in the know please confirm)

GloomyJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:04 pm

ABOLISH THE FDICFDIC should be abolished. Because of FDIC insurance, depositors of accounts less than $100,000 have no incentive to care whether their bank is well managed and are just as likely to reward an insolvent bank with their deposits as a well managed one. In this way, FDIC insurance has contributed to the reckless behavior of the banking industry.FDIC insurance was created to prevent bank runs, but it sure doesn’t seem to work very well (@Pete Ca-thanks for the LA Times article about IndyMac). What FDIC insurance WILL do in the end is to serve as a mechanism to bill the taxpayer directly for bank losses related to mismanagement.

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:05 pm

From CNBC: "Fed Minutes: Growth Risks Diminishing, Inflation Risks Rising"Does the FED has any credibility left?

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:10 pm

I mean should be very embarrassing for the FED to have such hawkish minutes circulate right in the middle of the first bank run in years! LOL!@SWK, you are right on one point, the guys sit hot chairs.

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:17 pm

@anybody with enough time in his handsI was tempted to compile a sort of a time table with public forecasts made by the FED and the Treasuries (with source) and one or more same-time comments/forecasts made on the usual suspects in the financial blogshpere (our NR, Mish, CalculatedRisk, Hellasious, and others). And then what actually happened.I gave up due to time constraints, but I think it would be a great public service. Anybody has seen something like that on the web?

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:18 pm

Hey c’mon, wall street is cheering Fed minutes! Dow up almost 200 points now, shot up 50 points after minutes released. Let the grand illusion continue…

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

@ Alessandro 13:10:06>SWK, you are right on one point, the guys sit hot chairs.You bet. I’ll bet Dr. Bernanke is longing for a pair of asbestos underwear right now…SWK

Wall Termite JournalJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

I heard that Freddie and Fannie are not doing well these days. I also heard that uncle Sam is trying to help out with the donations he had collected on April 15. Uncle Sam has many bills to pay but when it’s time to help friends, he never hesitates. What I like most about uncle Sam is his compassion and generosity. I plan to make another donation to uncle Sam’s charitable fund next April 15 and I urge you to do the same.

kilgoresJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:27 pm

A little humor (very little)…___So Dr. Roubini and Dr. Bernanke wind up sitting next to each other on a plane to Washington, D.C. Dr. Roubini leans over to Dr. Bernanke and says, "Hey, I have a great joke for you about Chairmen of the Federal Reserve." Dr. Bernanke replies, "Wait a minute! I’m the Chairman of the Federal Reserve!" To which Dr. Roubini responds, "That’s O.K. I’ll tell it to you slowly…" ;-) SWK

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

@Guest on 2008-07-16 13:24:10The FIDC insurance is part of the problem in finance as are the GSEs, the FED, the fiat money and all the things that are set up so that banks and politicians can steal from the public without being noticed.Get an education on the subject. It’s worth the time.

Forensic economistJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

Gloomy – we should not abolish the FDIC; the FDIC should have done its job as a regulator which it failed to do. Congress likewise failed to oversee the FDIC.Small depositors do not have the time or expertise to analyze the safety of banks. Before deposit insurance, a bank run on one bank could turn into a general run on banks. Scared depositors would withdraw their money from all banks and put it under their mattresses, withdrawing it from circulation, shrinking the money supply, and worsening the economy.The FDIC was supposed to insure that banks were not lending recklessly. Instead it appears to have been captured by banks it was supposed to oversee.Congress is supposed to oversee the FDIC. It was asleep.Who is to blame for the FDIC and other failures?The House Financial Services Committee is a good place to start:http://financialservices.house.gov/who.htmlBarney Franks is the chairman. There is blame to share in both parties. Ron Paul is also on the committee.Yes, I know counting on Congress for protection when the large banks are funding their reelection campaigns may be a vain hope. But we can vote some of these people out of office.

Dazed and ConfusedJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:41 pm

As an individual without knowledge on the topic of financial crisis intervention / mitigation, I am requestinginput for the following questions:1) What organizations (government and others) may intervene?2) What are some of the potential methods and strategies they can apply?3) What are the probable ramifications of the methods and strategies?

AlessandroJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:51 pm

@Forensic economistas we have under our eyes, incompetence and corruption are defining traits of regulators, FDIC, FED, SEC, all of them, and Congress above all.Without the FDIC we get bank runs.With the FDIC we get bank runs.I’d go without.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 1:53 pm

"Get an education on the subject. It’s worth the time."no, you get an education and while at it some common sense, idiot. so you gonna tell people, no deposit insurance when people deposit their money in any bank. what kind of crack you been taking? tell that to people, they will think you are delusional, moron.

Forensic economistJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

More people to recall. Here is the Senate Banking Committee membership. Chairman is Dodd of Connecticut. Former chairman (before 11/06) was Shelby of Alabama.http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Information.MembershipFrom last September press release:"Dodd has …advocated that the Administration raise the portfolio caps for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in a manner that is safe, sound, and targeted to consumer-friendly mortgages.""consumer friendly" sounds like low interest rate, low down, low doc — Dodd wanted more of it.

GloomyJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:08 pm

@Forensic economist, GuestOver 2 trillion dollars in bank deposits are NOT FDIC insured. Bank runs are gonna happen regardless of the presence or absence of FDIC insurance.Let me just repeat what Alessandro said so elegantly, with a little modification.1. Without FDIC you get bank runs, but the taxpayer is not on the hook.2. With FDIC you get bank runs, and the taxpayer is on the hook.I’m a taxpayer, I’ll take the former, thank you.

KJ FoehrJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:19 pm

Fannie, Freddie Debt Continues To Weaken Amid Uncertainty By Prabha Natarajan excerptJuly 16, 2008 15:14 ET NEW YORK (Dow Jones)–Freddie Mac (FRE) and Fannie Mae (FNM) debt continued to slide on Wednesday, as ongoing concerns about the financial system and the broader economy caused many investors to shy away from the agency debt market. This is the third consecutive session that risk premiums on the debt have risen, and comes despite the U.S. government’s proposal to support the two mortgage giants and subsequent testimony by top policy makers reiterating the Bush Administration position. Smaller investors unaccustomed to such volatility in a market that has been historically calm continue to pare back their exposure to this market, said market participants. Hedge funds have also been sellers, they said. Risk premiums on Fannie Mae’s 3.25% issue due 2010 were up 6 basis points against comparative Treasurys on Wednesday at 87 basis points. The note priced at 74 basis points over Treasurys a week ago. Meanwhile, the Freddie 4.875% note due June 2018 was up 6 basis points at 84 basis points. Before concerns about the two housing agencies become widespread, risk premiums on agency debt typically moved by one basis point on any given trading day. Another indication of how little conviction there is in the market is the difference between what sellers are asking and what buyers are willing to pay. On Freddie Mac’s 4.875% 10-year note, the so-called bid/ask spread is two basis points, which is unusually large. This is the issue that Freddie Mac added $1 billion to in its private placement announced Wednesday. …

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:29 pm

Well the plan has worked! Look at those stocks on the SEC’s list and look at the shorts run for their lives! Phony up 30%, Fraudy up 30%, Wells Fargo up 32%, 36 of 90 financial stocks in the S&P500 are up more than 10%! THIS IS THE BOTTOM BECAUSE THEY SAID SO, NOT BECUASE THE TRUTH IS BEING REFLECTED VIA FREE MARKETS! Welcome the the United Socialist States!

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:31 pm

This should add another 100 points or so to the sow rally:3:18 p.m.[IDMC] FBI probes IndyMac for possible fraud in loans: report

CaponeJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:40 pm

trillions of hours of analysis done by millions of highly educated financial professionals tossed right out the window as the government says f’ it. let’s just make it illegal for the market to go down… ha ha ha there are still new lows being put in every single damn day in the the level of integrity of the financial system and markets of the world charted over time – new lows everyday. all efforts to shore up integrity have become so preposterous and laughable that any rational human being (perhaps including monkeys) sees through the efforts immediately.Here is a headline for you:Karachi exchange in Pakistan leads SEC implementing US market guidelines HA HA HA LOL the sad joke is on everyone. "why not ban short selling entirely like they did on the Karachi and the index went up 15% in one day ! so the SEC is taking a page out of Pakistan’s market plunge management ?Written by Capone on 2008-07-15 13:40:03"BKX +7.15 or 14.75% ha ha haremember this is not gambling, speculation or even gaming – it is investing. watch out for times when they change the rules in the middle of your "investing"

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:48 pm

Unbelievable! Soon TPTB will make a stock you buy a binding agreement and you will have to go to court to divorce it. Stocks will never again go down. It’s great to be an American.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 2:53 pm

This is incredible! Wells Fargo has erased 6 weeks of losses in ONE DAY! Let me say that again, they have wiped out 6 weeks of selling just today. Wells Fargo had a 3 standard deviation move in ONE DAY!!!!

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:01 pm

Last update: 3:59 p.m. EDT July 16, 2008 NEW YORK (MarketWatch) Thailand’s central bank raised its key interest rate by 25 basis points to 3.50% on Wednesday in a move aimed at fighting soaring inflation.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:02 pm

4:00 p.m.[$INDU] Dow industrials tally biggest single-day jump since April 1Funny how the story hasn’t changed, just outlaw shorting and things will go up forever.

AfAJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

I am Sorry.Sorry Dr. Bernanke. Sorry Sir Paulson. Sorry Mr. Cox. Sorry Lehman. Sorry WaMu. Sorry Sorry Sorry for not believing in you when you said everything is OK … What a fool I was and what a fool I am!Time did come when the index is up 3% because a bank did not lose as much as it was expected to do. I was a fool to forget that markets do not fear Fed hawkishness anymore even in the face of a runaway price index. I feel stupid now that continuous detertioration in the housing market does not matter any more.Sooo, can you lend me few bank shares so I can short them? No!? What about the index? No!? So I am going.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

4:02 p.m. [FRE] Freddie, Fannie shares close up more than 30%4:01 p.m. [$INDU] Dow industrials rise 276.42 points, or 2.5%, to 11,238.964:01 p.m. [WFC] Wells Fargo shares end up 32% at $27.16

CaponeJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

US government introduces equity card the card will require payment for all goods and services to be made in fractional shares of their equity positions. all paychecks formely paid in cash will be invested 100% into financial shares. wait a minute, the equity card was a joke. outside of the card joke, that is effectively what is, has and will continue to occur through inflation – purchasing power of cash completely and totally erased to support banks.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:07 pm

Now why would this be???? I guess a rising fraud-er-I mean tide lifts all boats4:05 p.m. GM, Ford shares soar to join broader market rally

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:10 pm

BULLETIN DOW INDUSTRIALS SURGE 278 POINTS; S&P FINANCIAL-SECTOR GAUGE ENJOYS BIGGEST DAY EVER

randyJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:12 pm

This has been a depressing day!I cannot believe that the market could rally on such light information!I am thankful that all my shorts are longer term and I can weather the storm. I do not trust the wall street boys like GS. I think they pulled this to reign in the shorts. Now the market can tank like hell and GS can get rich! Remember, nothing fundamentally has changed. The market will go down again.!!!!!!!

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:15 pm

Hey! In the past year, the buck is off 13% against Europe’s baby euro, wholesale prices are up 9%, home foreclosures are up 53%, and yet all that the club of socialist trollers on this blog can talk about is giving big government more rope. We are having war, wage stagnation, recession and inflation, all at the same time — all rooted in actions of the private bankers and a “bipartisan” puppet government. This, while many of the blog points here, can you believe it, politely and sweetly wonder if we need more Marxism? It is hard to believe that 19th century Paris café talk is still with us after the spectacular crimes of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao swept away all those lies and nations in the 20th century.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

So which one is it???!!!!!! Friggin obfuscation once again!4:17 p.m. [EBAY] EBay Q2 gross merchandise volume $15.68 bln 4:16 p.m. [EBAY] EBay Q2 gross merchandise volume $14.46 bln

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:21 pm

Indeed, a large part of my portfolio is short. :( I managed to miss this bounce and my portfolio is down 18.5% in one day. Well, up until today it had been up 74% YTD… so I shouldn’t complain……or I should…since its play money and I don’t have a job. (left the ‘ol USA to try and find work in another country, no luck so far)

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:33 pm

This market is truly the twilight zone. These banks are with few exceptions technically insolvent and the index has biggest gain ever! Maybe the Fed cut a deal with WFC to subsidize their dividend in addition to taking their toxic crap in exchange for treasuries.

AfAJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:46 pm

"Yes, it’s here. Welcome to the Depression. No, don’t drop whatever it is you’re doing. Don’t get up. It’s not going anywhere. It will wait. It’s just going to sit over here in the corner and read a magazine while you do whatever it is you need to do. A Depression doesn’t run hot and fierce like some crazed meth burner. A Depression is methodical, purposeful, patient. It will build a shelter out of tree branches and newspaper, light a small, well-contained campfire and wait you out, brother. While you feed on the empty calories of denial and popcorn, it will quietly gather shards of broken dreams and fashion them into a terrible weapon of blunt force reality."http://www.minyanville.com/articles/time-mortgage-housing-california-depression/index/a/18055

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 3:59 pm

@ [BRIEFING.COM]”The financial sector continues to rally, hitting a gain of 9.3% — the largest since the creation of the sector in 1989…”Well, why not? Wasn’t today’s move by the SEC to stop short selling in the Big 19 done so the boys could continue to make money while they continue to access the treasury until the dollar gets so weak it collapses on Wall Street. The Fed proved with Bear Stearns it would do anything under or above the table for its friends. Really, I expected the market to go much higher than this today: I mean Chris Cox didn’t just throw the beggars a crumb; it was the whole loaf of bread. It’s all so inevitable until the economy stops them. Read Roubini.What’s sickening is for the lapdog financial media to pretend the rise was based on compelling economic “news” – as if Big Economy cares one way or another about Wells Fargo.Lap it up Lehman, Goldman, Merrill, Morgan, and JP. Daddy Warbucks will save you from mean ol’ competition. And, hey, didn’t Lehman Brothers CEO Richard Fuld say, "I will hurt the shorts, and that is my goal"? Well, don’t make a mean kid mad when his daddy runs the bank.

GloomyJuly 16th, 2008 at 4:30 pm

I’D SUE!!!If I were a large bank, but not one of the SEC’s cartel, I would file a discrimination suit alleging that the SEC’s ruling is anticompetitive. The SEC’s ruling won’t do a thing for those banks not among the chosen few. It is delusional to think that failure of the National City’s and Wachovia’s of the world will not have a negative impact on all the banks and the market as a whole. And, ultimately, there is nothing in the world that can save any of the big players from collapse or more likely nationalization.You folks should stop your moaning. The market dropped over 2000 points over a very short period and needs a little consolidation before proceding on its merry way down the path to Dow 5000. Patience is a virtue.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 4:48 pm

Calculated Risk’s posting of “Roubini on Bloomberg TV” gives several of Roubini’s points establishing "that this will turn out to be the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression and the worst US recession in decades …" and has received 223 comments, ending to date with this one:Michael LittleBig writes: It is absolutely unbelievable that the entire Government composed of elected officials and bureaucrats watched this economy unfold and did nothing until the economy was at a 911 crisis. If we think that the economy is a at crisis stage, I would suggest the negative quality of this government is beyond human imagination. These wealthy and powerful self-serving types of politicians have to be dealt with as our first priority or we will never end this downward spiral of the American economy. The phrase “when the government lives better than its people” is the politician’s creed. The American people are overwhelmed with the unnecessary pain that has been inflicted on them by the greed and the narcissism of people who continue to practice “me”. It is inconceivable that the mortgage lenders in this country through deceit have many Americans convinced that it is the mortgage borrowers fault for this foreclosure crisis because they are flippers and credit scumbags.The wealthy and powerful have just screwed several generations of their fellow man. Was it not the wealthy and the powerful that said, “Let them eat cake”?http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/

AnonymousJuly 16th, 2008 at 5:07 pm

New Orleans, the “Big Easy,” is still crawling back from the twin shocks of Hurricane-at-its-worst and Government-at-its-worst. Now, the new “Big Easy” is the loose-money cartel running the U.S. banking system that has become more dangerous to our nation’s future health than 100 hurricanes.The high rolling chiselers who run this gambling house, called the financial industry, are finally on the ropes. In the name of justice, I say let them hang and to heck with bail.

PonderJuly 16th, 2008 at 5:41 pm

@ AfA on 2008-07-16 05:54:56Now, isn’t that just the honest analysis of what is going on. That is indeed hard for anyone to refute unless they have another agenda (as far as I am concerned). And so, that we are clear, I lean towards them being liars. They have more information and resources at their disposal than most and if they were incompetent they would have sought help from the likes of the professor (their big ego’s not withstanding). So, my verdict: Liars.

GloomyJuly 16th, 2008 at 5:45 pm

A LETTER TO OUR BELOVED GOVERNMENTDear Government, I know you are going to nationalize everything and assess me for all the goddamn losses due to reckless behavior undertaken by unqualified homebuyers, crooked loan originators, and sleazy financial institutions, despite the fact that I did not participate in any of their schemes. This is completely unfair, as they should all go bankrupt and get what they deserve and, as I am blameless, their problems should not be mine. As I cannot stop you from sticking me with the bill for a all of this crap, I have decided to give you some of your own crap back by shorting the hell out of any financial stocks that I think you care about. I get special pleasure out of this not only because making money by shorting insolvent financial institutions is like shooting fish in a barrel, but because it apparently really pisses you off. So go ahead, nationalize all the banks and stick me with the bill. I will have made so much money betting against your insolvent financial system, I won’t care. Oh, yeah. None of my money will be in dollars, so your sabotaging of my country’s currency won’t matter to me either. By the way, I’m going to do my utmost to disseminate publically available financial data available in SEC filings, which accurately portray your banks as the worthless hunks of garbage that they really are. I know such "rumor spreading" really pisses you off too, so I’m going to really enjoy it. I am enjoying watching you slither like the snakes you really are as you scheme to make me suffer, But I promise I shall give as much as I will get and I will survive and prosper despite your best efforts. Go to Hell. Gloomy

PonderJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:00 pm

Not having a go at you @SWKBut Benanke and Paulson knew their role and how hot the position is. They accepted the position and the pay and perks that go with it. So, IMO they are accountable for their actions whether they are little marionettes. If what they are saying is not true, they have the option of saying nothing with comments like analysis into solutions are being sought etc (if that is true). whether they can save anything or not is something else and they will not have lied about it. But to cause people to continue losing their money/savings/investments through the words that they say which are not true is to lie. A lie is a lie is a lie is a lie.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

Terminate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by Michael S. RozeffI am a minority of one, or a very small number, in thinking that the failures of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are good news.These two companies should not exist. No private companies should have lines of credit to the U.S. Treasury, that is, U.S. taxpayers. No private companies should be linked to a government mandate that they facilitate affordable housing by buying up mortgages. No private companies should issue debts that investors believe may have an implicit guarantee provided by taxpayers.The only bad thing about these failures is what the Federal government may do next to keep them alive. The only bad thing is that the Federal government will probably make matters worse. This is a golden opportunity to end these enterprises once and for all. And doing that is incredibly simple! Any Wall Street investment bank can, in short order, produce a plan to restructure these companies and charge the appropriate (high) fees for carrying out that plan. The possible ways to restructure include sales of the assets, creating subsidiaries and selling them, spinning off subsidiary companies, and breaking up the company into several companies. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could also put their entire companies up for sale.Such restructurings are Wall Street’s bread and butter. The equity values of these companies have already fallen considerably. Their value in a restructuring may be quite small, but control does have a non-negligible value. The markets are already pricing the debts of these two giants at less than face value, despite the chance of an implicit guarantee or a taxpayer bailout. The debt-holders took a chance buying this paper. They should bear the consequences. Restructuring will reveal the true worth of these debt securities.Investors in these enterprises, both debt and equity holders, should not be bailed out by the taxpayers. These two companies made bad investments by buying mortgages that have gone bad. These two companies also issued too much debt to finance these investments, which gave them very shaky financial structures. The worth of their assets is less than the worth of their liabilities, which makes them insolvent.They are not yet bankrupt. They still have the cash to service their debts. These debts are by no means worthless. About 11.6 percent of money market funds are invested in agency debt. At current prices of these debts, news of money market troubles has not surfaced. If those prices fell by 10 percent, the money market losses would be a modest 1 percent…Without the government in the picture, there is no way that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could ever have grown so large. Their balance sheet assets (and liabilities) total about $1.6 trillion. They have off-balance liabilities of another $3.5 trillion or so. How big is $5 trillion? The national debt of the U.S. is $9.5 trillion!It is almost unbelievable that these two companies could have run up debts that are more than half the size of the country’s national debt. But that is inherent in the chemistry of government + housing + debt guarantees. The housing market is huge, especially over time as the housing stock accumulates. By giving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac an advantage in issuing debt, these companies came to dominate the housing finance market. There is no better time than now to end this absurdity.Freddie Mac faces huge losses, as much as $775,000,000. Its equity can easily be wiped out. That means bankruptcy. That is nothing to fear, either. That means that restructuring will be forced upon the company. The point is to let it happen and happen quickly and get the government out of the picture altogether.Naturally, this has not been what the government has been doing. Instead, it has done the opposite so far. Congress has passed a bill that awaits the President’s signature or veto. There will be a deal. The bill increases mortgage loan limits drastically. Smart move, guys. Pelosi wants them even higher, $730,000 instead of $625,000.Mr. Corruption himself, Chris Dodd, is the lead sponsor of the bill. Even as the stocks of these two companies approach $0, he reassures the public that the CEOs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and Ben Bernanke tell him that they are not at risk of default. This is a bald-faced lie…Michael S. Rozeff is a retired Professor of Finance living in East Amherst, New York.

AfAJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:17 pm

Previously in “The Young and the Reckless”The old twin witches from Desperate Housewives lost their virginity last week and are suing Marko for “rape with consent”. Marko denied and declared to journalists “It wasn’t me!” and while pointing then giving a finger back towards the sisters he added “these ^$(#^$ have no Reserve whatsoever, they were leveraging me to do it”Indy, which had stroke, died of a heart failure after a run. Witnesses said the victim was heard whispering some incomprehensible words and repeating “ … ballot …why not … me …” The autopsy revealed that the victim was suffering from a contagious virus. Some people who knew the victim told reporters that the victim was part of a gangbang club.As planned, Bernando opened the Window to help his Gang of New York homies escape with all jewelry and gold after spilling fuel and oil all over the house while homeowners were asleep. He then yelled while lighting up a match “the Helicopter is two blocks from here, hurry up”Warren, aka “The Exorcist”, failed to deliver Munis from its evil spirits. The body, while taken by a sudden trembling, said in a hollow voice “credum defalli souapum” or something like that.MBA just applied for a BBA.Ambak announced it was left stuck with a whole stock of cds, ranging from Hard Rock to House Trance, and stated it is hoping to convince Sony’s BMG to rate them.A dwarf was found guilty and sentenced for 2 years of jail after he has been arrested by the Federals who received an anonymous call claiming “the man’s short”.The Pope, Jean Paulson, decreed it is blasphemous to disagree with him.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:44 pm

Stop, Look, and Listen to RoubiniAs I watch the bear maul those jumping in and out on the ups and downs of this downward market, I turned back today to re-read Roubini. Why he bothers with us I’m not sure, but this is the mother of all posts. He nailed this economy with a million square hits.It is hard to fatham the genius of the man and I am sure that without him we would all be more badly mauled than we are. Each of his bullets lays bare the dangers ahead for us in this economic crisis – the landmines, the potholes, the damage.To proceed forward, without heeding these warnings, is a foolhardy journey. As for me, on this downward trek in the “worst financial crisis since the GD,” I’m keeping my eyes trained on Roubini.Until I hear otherwise from Roubini, in the days and months ahead I’m looking out for the probability of “hundreds of small banks” and “dozens of large regional/national banks” to go bust; the risk of a “bank-like run on the very short term liquid liabilities of the major independent broker dealers”; FDIC bailouts of the major money centers; Congress to eventually have to re-capitalize FDIC; the corrupt Fannie and Freddie continuing their system whereby “profits are privatized and losses socialized”; financial crisis credit losses of “at least $1 trillion and more likely $2 trillion”… in “the most severe U.S. recession in decades with the U.S. consumer being on the ropes”… and where “equity prices will fall by about 40% relative to their peak…”Where, “over time inflation will be the last problem that the Fed will have to face” as US recession and global slowdown eventually lead to, among other things, “a fall in commodity prices of the order of 20-30%” with “US twin deficits, recession, financial crisis and rising commodity and goods inflation in emerging market economies” eventually unraveling “the Bretton Woods 2 regime of fixed exchange rates to the US dollar and/or heavily managed exchange.”

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 7:44 pm

Looking at the various financial commentaries over the last 2-3 days … I think Kevin DePew may have got it right. See the following link …http://biz.yahoo.com/minyanville/080716/20080715ftstealthdep_id.html?.v=1We already ARE in a depression in America, folks.This is the first year, and this is what it feels like at the beginning. AMBAC and MBIA gone. Fannie and Freddie gone. IndyMac bankrupt. Emergency Fed loans to every greedy idiot who refuses to deleverage. Ford and GM making desperate last-minute changes to stave off bankruptcy. Housing prices still collapsing, and the bottom nowhere in sight. The rest of the world trying as hard as possible to distance itself from the US economy – without causing a collapse in their own countries at the same time.Sounds pretty much like the start of a depression to me.PeteCA

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:08 pm

@Pete “Sounds pretty much like the start of a depression to me.”For sure, it’s disaster, with a capital ‘D’ and that rhymes with “T’ and that stands for Trouble!We’ve surely got trouble … We surely got trouble…Remember the Maine, Plymouth Rock and the Golden Rule? … Our children’s children gonna have trouble…Oho, we got trouble … We’re in terrible, terrible trouble…

ptmJuly 16th, 2008 at 8:34 pm

How was that again, the consumer is all shopped out and up their ears in debt? This could be the start of a trend…However, the investigation showed that at the time of his death, Mr. Hickman’s life was in turmoil. Lisa Hickman, his wife of 29 years, was ill, and he had been caring for her for some time. Mr. Hickman had also recently lost some money in the stock market, Lt. Anglada said.Mr. Hickman worked for Red Lobster for 32 years and oversaw restaurants in the chain from North Richland Hills to West Texas. He started as a manager trainee, company officials said. In 1977, Mr. Hickman was promoted to general manager and headed operations at restaurants in Wisconsin, Illinois, North Carolina and Florida. He became director of operations in 2003 when he took over restaurants in parts of Texas.http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/071608dnmethickman.3d76e7d.html

CaponeJuly 16th, 2008 at 9:12 pm

i wonder how the current chaos and sentiment compares to the days of prior financial crises ? were people making things up and changing rules at such a clip everyday to stave off the inevitable when prior atomic busts took place ? i don’t know, i mean could you leverage 40 to 1 to speculate on Dutch tulips during the peak of the craze through derivatives ? well, no. could you substantially leverage against any asset throughout the financial history of mankind in the way it has been done now. well, no. to say, this will be a deep recession is the financial understatement of the last 500 years if not of all recorded history since Unga traded a sharp rock with Imba in a cave for the promise of berry after the sun went down and rose the next day 20,000 years ago IMHO. this extremely simple analogy, all others before it and all others that will follow it are my gratitude towards Bernanke and Paulson for fed rate cut machine gunning me down over the past year destroying me while igniting an inflationary fire that makes the 1,000 fires started by lightning in California look like a single match being lit to light a cigarette…

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:19 pm

LOL, maybe we are buying time so TROTW can join the biggest financial implosion party on earth2009-1929= 80 years celebration of GD, if we are gonna suffer another GD, lets do it in styleSpanish real esate bank Martinsa Fadesa declares bankruptcyhttp://www.breakingviews.com/2008/07/15/Martinsa%20Fadesa.aspx?sg=breakingstories

JLCJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:22 pm

I just bought a couple bags of pre-1965 US quarters. 90% silver, at a discount to spot price. They look different, fell different, sound different than today’s quarters. It was an early sign of the inevitable decline . . .

FRIEND OF WASHINGTON MUTUALJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:28 pm

Laurence J. KotlikoffIs the U.S. bankrupt? Or to paraphrase theOxford English Dictionary, is the UnitedStates at the end of its resources, exhausted,stripped bear, destitute, bereft, wanting inproperty, or wrecked in consequence of failureto pay its creditors?Many would scoff at this notion. They’d pointout that the country has never defaulted on itsdebt; that its debt-to-GDP (gross domestic product)ratio is substantially lower than that of Japan andother developed countries; that its long-termnominal interest rates are historically low; thatthe dollar is the world’s reserve currency; andthat China, Japan, and other countries have aninsatiable demand for U.S. Treasuries.Others would argue that the official debtreflects nomenclature, not fiscal fundamentals;that the sum total of official and unofficial liabilitiesis massive; that federal discretionary spendingand medical expenditures are exploding; that theUnited States has a history of defaulting on itsofficial debt via inflation; that the government hascut taxes well below the bone; that countries holdingU.S. bonds can sell them in a nanosecond; thatIs the United States bankrupt? Many would scoff at this notion. Others would argue that financialimplosion is just around the corner. This paper explores these views from both partial and generalequilibrium perspectives. It concludes that countries can go broke, that the United States is goingbroke, that remaining open to foreign investment can help stave off bankruptcy, but that radicalreform of U.S. fiscal institutions is essential to secure the nation’s economic future. The paperoffers three policies to eliminate the nation’s enormous fiscal gap and avert bankruptcy: a retailsales tax, personalized Social Security, and a globally budgeted universal healthcare system.Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, July/August 2006, 88(4), pp. 235-49.THIS PAPER WAS POSTED ON FABIUS MAXIMUS BLOGFOR THE REST OF THIS PAPER GO TO THE LINK BELOWhttp://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/06/07/Kotlikoff.pdf

ptmJuly 16th, 2008 at 10:55 pm

JLC on 2008-07-16 22:22:37 – I just bought a couple bags of pre-1965 US quarters. 90% silver, at a discount to spot price. They look different, fell different, sound different than today’s quarters.I am buying mine through Northwestern Territorial Mint http://bullion.nwtmint.com/silver_bags.php, but they are slower than Christmas. They want a month after the purchase to rustle up the coins. Who do you use? Are you happy with them?

AfAJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:10 pm

Wow, Fadesa is bankrupt? Fadesa is to Spain what Fannie and Freddie is to the US. From what I remember when I was around, Fadesa was one of the biggest European property developers and was grabbing contracts in Europe, North Africa and North America. Excerpt from link above (thanks guest)"It’s last hope – Spain’s Official Credit Institute, an arm of Finance Ministry – also rejected the company, sending a STRONG SIGNAL about how dire the market really is. Unlike the US government, the Spanish authorities seem willing to face up their real estate crisis"

ZarathustraJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:40 pm

Interesting comment on the Big Picture:"Hmmm.Financials up 17% today, Fannie and Freddie up 30%, BUT spreads on Fannie debt, and U.S. swap spreads, are both wider by 10%.That would make sense if the market believes that the Treasury is less likely to nationalize the agencies today than they were yesterday. But then you would expect to see CDS spreads on T-bonds come in substantially. However, they also widened today to a new record 21.8 bps (vs. 1.5 bps historical average until mid-June). To be clear, this means that to insure $10,000,000 face worth of 5 year U.S. Treasury bonds AGAINST DEFAULT, it costs EUR 21,800 today vs a historical average of EUR 1,500 (obviously you wouldn’t insure a default against U.S. Treasury debt with dollars!)Why would credit spreads widen if the market, as demonstrated by such a strong rally in stocks, feels more secure about the financials and the agencies.I am reminded of the old investment saw that when there is a disagreement between the stock market and the credit market, always side with the credit market.There have been lots of stories of witch-hunts today – 30 subpoenas sent out by the SEC to various hedge funds and iBanks (Goldman Sachs is one, along with SAC and Citadel, two of the largest hedge funds) inquiring about improper trading practices (i.e. naked shorts, rumour-mongering, etc.) Apparently the SEC makes lots of noises and blows lots of wind, but they haven’t actually sent out subpoenas en masse like this since the market timing scandal a few years back.Now, if you were the head of compliance at an investment bank or hedge fund, and you received subpoenas from the SEC regarding your trading practices in U.S. financials, what would you do? Would you instruct your CEO to unwind any off-side trades in a hurry? Where would you start? Probably naked shorts, right, because they are easy to discover in the system.And what has been the dominant hedge-fund bet this year? Short financials and long energy you say? Ahah! So when you unwind your financial shorts you have to unwind your energy longs. I see.I think this unwinding process began yesterday. Volumes in the banks support the short-covering thesis as well. Fannie and Freddie volume was strong but not as strong as yesterday.In that context, it’s amazing that the energy complex and the commodity sectors held in as well as they did today."http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/07/wild-times-on-w.html#comments

JLCJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:46 pm

@ptmI know what you mean about NWT Mint. They are slow as molasses, but have a smaller markup on their bullion than the other dealers I could find.I got my "junk" quarters from Bulliondirect.com. Took about 2 weeks. And I think they had better prices than NWT Mint. The only problem – a couple of bags were short one quarter, and one bag had 3 1974 Canadian Quarters! I am working with them to fix that, I’ll let you know how it goes. I only got them yesterday.

GuestJuly 16th, 2008 at 11:59 pm

@Capone: > “i wonder how the current chaos and sentiment compares to the days of prior financial crises ? were people making things up and changing rules at such a clip everyday to stave off the inevitable when prior atomic busts took place ?”This is an historic point with this nation. I think only good can come from this. This is the breakup and Roubini saw it coming. It’s different this time around because critical people and the Internet have pulled the curtain on the governnent’s stealing and corruption. As Average Jane said, it’s starting to be a topic on Main Street. The public is putting 2 and 2 together and getting a trillion.The war in Iraq ($537,000,000,000) is costing less (in money) than what Freddie and Fannie are on the hook for (est.$680,000,000,000)* in massive subsidized liquidity, credit and bailout funding. You can’t tell me that Bernanke by dropping helicopter loads of paper and Paulson by squandering the treasury can cover it and have the economy left. They can’t cover it. As they try, it’s going to get more and more frustrating.Bernanke and Paulson are not truthful. Unfortunately for TPTB, Bush is totally out of his element – not as a liar but as a competent liar who can restore confidence in the people. Asked about Fannie and Freddie, he’s like a deer in the headlights if it gets beyond the two answers he’s memorized. And reporters are playing hardball.The pruning of the economy may be severe, but if the country is restored to its healthy roots, any restoration to its former glory will be worth the price.*My figures adding $15,000,000,000 each for taxpayer purchase of shares, $300,000,000,000 each for taxpayer lines of credit, and creditors/bondholders current annual taxpayer subsidized debt spread relative to US Treasuries of $50,000,000,000.

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 12:38 am

@AfA on 2008-07-16 23:10:06Wow, Fadesa is bankrupt? Fadesa is to Spain what Fannie and Freddie is to the US.Fannie and Freddie in US are mortgage purchases of last resort in the US, while Fadesa is a developer in Spain. A bit different but still important. Besides, a lot of the property woes in Spain and countries in the eastern Europe was fueled by people from other EU countries, such as UK that for some years ran the same sort of GDP-inflating scheme as the US (and which is now collapsing). They are not exactly in the same situation as the US because in the US the housing bubble was fueled by domestic borrowing.In the Spain you have a collapsing housing market, but the speculators could mostly be in the UK.

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 1:00 am

@guest above,thanks for the explanation,in other words, real estate in EU is in the same Doo Doo too…

MASHIACH BEN CHANAJuly 17th, 2008 at 1:10 am

THE RUSSIAN ARE COMINGI WILL BET WITH PROFESSOR RUBINI OVER 100000 US DOLLAR THAT RUSSIA WILL GO TO WAR WITH NATO AND WILL INVADE THE ENTIRE EASTERN AND WESTERN UNION. EURO WILL WORTH NOTHING.IF I WILL LOOSE THE BET, I WILL GIVE PROFESSOR RUBINI 100000 US DOLLAR. IF PROFESSOR RUBINI LOOSE I SHOULD GET LIFE TIME MEMBERSHIP OF RGE MONITOR FREE.

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 1:13 am

IF PROFESSOR RUBINI LOOSE I SHOULD GET LIFE TIME MEMBERSHIP OF RGE MONITOR FREE.LOL, at least you have a good sense of humour

MedicJuly 17th, 2008 at 5:11 am

So I was at my (small & local) bank on Tuesday. I got to talking with the loan officer who was uncomfortable with my direct questions about how they were doing in the crisis. She did let on that they have had increases in defaults like everyone else (no surprise to me) and that the people who were in the most trouble were not the low-income crowd, but the high-end folks (big surprise to her). Her statement to me was that "It’s not the ones you would think who are in trouble. It’s the ones with too much debt. Credit cards, vehicle loans, boats and other stuff on top of a large mortgage is killing them. You would not believe how much some people have on their credit cards."She then proceeded to tell me what kinds of loans they are mostly writing now: loans to purchase pellet stoves. Small bank – small town – big problems with the big picture.She also described the new definition of a "good" credit score. 740 used to be "excellent", but it has been downgraded to "good". The old "good" credit score of 660 is now being treated as a risky level for a loan by the bank, and those folks are paying a premium to finance anything.PS – she was unconvinced that Fannie and Freddy were in any "real" trouble. Armed with all the information she gave me (and more that she didn’t, I am sure) she is still in denial about the gravity of what faces us.

CaponeJuly 17th, 2008 at 5:52 am

"Pakistani Investors Stone Karachi Exchange as Stocks Plunge By Farhan SharifJuly 17 (Bloomberg) — Pakistan stock investors threw stones and smashed windows at Karachi’s stock exchange to protest the worst losing streak in at least 18 years, prompting intervention by the police and paramilitary officers. Restrictions Lifted Trading restrictions, including a ban on short-selling, were lifted with effect from July 14 by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan after the exchange announced a 50 billion rupee fund to buy stocks. Short sellers borrow shares and sell them, hoping to replace the stock at a lower price and pocket the difference. The curbs had been introduced to halt a plunge in the Karachi Index" Ummm, sound familiar ? Will ban on short selling in US financials yield the same result ? Sorry, I had not been following this one since I saw the headline the other day that the market had gone up 15% in one day when they banned short selling… exactly as the BKX went up yesterday following a ban on short selling. In summary, the US implemented strongly related if not identical measures as the regulators of Pakistan on financial companies. The US action FOLLOWED Pakistan’s move. Pakistan’s market popped on the initial ban of short selling and rolled back down within days. Shortly after the ban on short selling was lifted the market was plummeting severely again. A brief review on short selling – it was around at least since 1929 so 80 years and the SECs of Pakistan, first and now the SEC of the United States of America banned the activity. http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui see chart it looks like 6/24 was the ban on short selling and July 14th was when the ban was lifted…

HubbsJuly 17th, 2008 at 7:03 am

@the Russian on 2008-07-17 03:46:16I wonder if it is that Wachovia Bank (WB) and Washington Mutual (WM) are being used as bait for the shorters, and that all the others on the protected list allow TPTB to concentrate their efforts financially on trapping the shorters.

TaxpayerJuly 17th, 2008 at 7:24 am

Prof. Roubini, your fame is spreading.I heard you on Australian radio yesterday.It is slowly dawning on us here in the Antipodes that this is not just a temporary downturn and your quotes play a part in delivering the media message.Until now the media have been insisting that it was just a glitch.It will probably be a few more months before we twig that we are sitting on a volcano. :-)

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 8:46 am

By Timothy R. HomanJuly 17 (Bloomberg) — U.S. housing starts unexpectedly surged the most in more than two years in June because of a change in New York City’s building code that overshadowed a slide in single-family home construction. Housing starts rose 9.1 percent to a 1.066 million pace from a revised 977,000 rate in May, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Excluding a jump in construction of multifamily units in the Northeast, starts would have dropped 4 percent. Work began on single-family homes at the slowest pace in 17 years.

ptmJuly 17th, 2008 at 8:48 am

Guest on 2008-07-16 23:59:36 – *My figures adding $15,000,000,000 each for taxpayer purchase of shares, $300,000,000,000 each for taxpayer lines of credit, and creditors/bondholders current annual taxpayer subsidized debt spread relative to US Treasuries of $50,000,000,000.Could you explain your rationale in more detail? What is taxpayer purchase of shares, taxpayer lines of credit, and taxpayer subsidized debt spread? Thanks.

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 8:49 am

American leaders have lost their minds with their efforts to socialize the free market! Now, oil prices are not allowed to go up while bank stocks are not allowed to go down.

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 9:38 am

10:30 a.m.IMF: Fed, ECB don’t need to hurry to hike rates10:30 a.m.IMF: Developing countries must focus on inflation risk10:30 a.m.IMF: G7, global growth to slow in second half of ’0810:30 a.m.IMF report: Global economy in a ‘tough spot’10:30 a.m.IMF: U.S. economy has nearly stalled but hasn’t stalled yet

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 9:40 am

$BKX, the bank index, is miraculously up another 6% this morning! Look at that, socialism does work afterall! Remeber powers that be…bad things happen to bad people….

KJ FoehrJuly 17th, 2008 at 10:12 am

The stock market, waking from a dream of a bottom in financials, returns to the nightmare of the current reality: there is no real bottom in sight.

randyJuly 17th, 2008 at 10:56 am

at least the Spanish have the guts to tell their equivalent of freddie and fannie to take a hike. What do we do…………remove their loan limits, open the discount window……..and say keep going your well capitalized!!!!!!I can’t believe have we come to this in this country. A bunch of crooks on wall street and in Washington…….Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely!

randyJuly 17th, 2008 at 10:58 am

I’m still waiting on NR to address why the US markets will not go down……I KNOW he knows about the actions of the PPT. Maybe this is a subject that is even taboo for NR? I would not be surprised. I’d be scared too. I’m sure he doesn’t want an unneeded IRS audit.

randyJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:00 am

maybe I should shutup too……..I don’t want to be one of the first rounded up when/if martial law is instituted and end up in one of those FEMA camps I’ve read about online.

GuestJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:03 am

@ptm: “Could you explain your rationale in more detail? What is taxpayer purchase of shares, taxpayer lines of credit, and taxpayer subsidized debt spread? Thanks.”Well, I’ll probably get a B for effort and a C- or worse for accuracy from Roubini, but here are the figures I used from the Professor’s Sunday evening update:1.“Under the plan the U.S. government would become a major shareholder in the two GSEs (the unofficial figure being rumored is $15 billion for each institution)” 2.“it would massively extend the Treasury line of credit to the two institutions that is now only $ 2.25 billion for each of them (the unofficial number being rumored is one of a line of credit as large as $300 billion per each institution)”3.“the creditors/bondholders of the GSEs are made whole and continue to enjoy the subsidy of whatever spread the agency debt will remain relative to US Treasuries (a subsidy that is already worth $50 billion a year).” I substituted the world “taxpayer” for "U.S. government" and "Treasury" because either immediately or ultimately every dollar of government spending must be raised through a dollar of taxation.It makes a difference on the exact definition of “shareholder” as to 1. and 2. but not that much in the end since Paulson is not coming forth with all the details. How do you see it?I’m also adding here a comment the Professor added to his July 11 Post to round out the full monetary impact:When i wrote that "Switching the informal guarantee of GSEs debt to a formal government guarantee would by itself increase the US gross public debt by $5 trillion and effectively double it" i explicitly used the term "gross debt". The increase in the net debt is equal to the value of those $5 trillion liabilities minus the value of the assets of the GSEs. If the GSEs are insolvent to the tune of $300 billion the increase in the net debt of the US is only "300 billion". Still even in this case the gross debt has gone up by $5 trillion and the US gov would be liable for any further future loss in the value of the assets of the GSEs that it has taken on.” 2008-07-11 23:49:52In this hyper devaluation/inflation of the dollar, speaking in billions and trillions is about like speaking in wheelbarrow loads; it almost gets meaningless.

Hong Kong fun managerJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:04 am

See the Chinese government is not to ‘adjust" the stock markets, but you can see how the socialist american government is managing the stock markets.No news under the sun!

HousingDepressionJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:05 am

Randy,It doesn’t go down in a straight line. You will have two steps down, then another step up. And so on. I am going to buy more shorts if markets start going up. The next job report is going to take everything back.

GloomyJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:25 am

"Over a plate of pasta on a January afternoon at Cecconi’s restaurant in London, Pierre Naim outlined his plan to make money by betting that the U.S. government’s financial reputation would crumble like Parmesan cheese…"S&P’s estimate of the cost of shoring up the GSEs plus the Home Loan banks is as much as $1.4 trillion. And as we said, none of these estimates allow for higher Treasury borrowing costs."http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/07/phony-accounting-on-fannie-freddie.html

AnonymousJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:41 am

Written by randy on 2008-07-17 11:00:08http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGIC,GGIC:2006-46,GGIC:en&q=rex+84

AnonVJuly 17th, 2008 at 11:44 am

http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSWEN674920080717 KANSAS CITY, Missouri (Reuters) – Securities regulators from several U.S. states raided the St. Louis headquarters of Wachovia Securities on Thursday as part of a broad investigation into questionable practices involving auction rate securities, Missouri officials said. Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan’s office said the "special inspection" at the Wachovia Corp (WB.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) affiliate, the former A.G. Edwards, concerned the $330 billion auction rate securities meltdown. It said regulators were looking for information about Wachovia Securities’ sales practices, internal evaluations of the auction rate securities market, and marketing strategies.

Lisa HarriganJuly 18th, 2008 at 2:23 am

My Prediction – The Fall will happen in late January or early February 2009 and will be blamed on the Democrats taking office.Yes, they can manipulate it for that long, and they will. The Republican Statisticians will eek out a non-Recession until then, but then they will let the Sh*t Hit the Fan. After all the business people will no longer have a Buddy in the White House to protect.This will only make the Recession Worse, since nothing proper has been done until then to take care of things.The only saving grace is when we do come out of it, It Will Be the Democrats that Save Us, like they did the last time.But I doubt that most people will remember the lesson. Look at the mess we are in now.

CLSJuly 18th, 2008 at 9:40 am

I wish that woman interviewing him would stop interrupting him. Does she think she is more interesting than he is? I want to hear what he has to say, not what she does.

rc whalenJuly 21st, 2008 at 12:05 pm

Ditto.Here is an expert on banks who has been warning of a "reversion to the mean" for the past five years. This is why I know that Nouriel’s views are not far off and certainly not radical. Two years ago, the happy and content made fun of analysts like Nouriel and I, but now we are mainstream. Indeed, at IRA our work on a comprehensive credit market index based upon US bank profiles suggests that we are as little as 1/3 through the adjustment process. More, if you note the comments in the BAC call, we too see Q2 2009 as the "trough" in terms of bank financial results. The good news is that there are a good chunk of banks that are not in trouble and not going to experience above-normal loss rates. But the fraction of the bank population that is going to see loss rates exceed near-term troughs such as the early 1990s is big enough to bias the entire sector. Remember, we have not only over-leveraged ourselves financially but we have also over-leveraged our confidence as well. If Hank Paulson and George Bush don’t wake up and smell the coffee on issues like backing the GSEs, then we could face a full blown financial meltdown by Election Day. Chris Whalenwww.institutionalriskanalytics.com

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.