The Shape of the US Recession: V or U or W or L-Shaped?
Project Syndicate has now published my latest column “The Shape of the US Recession”. This is a shortened version of my April 7th blog “The US Recession: V or U or W or L-Shaped? where I first discussed whether the current US recession would be a short and shallow one (V-shaped), a more severe and protracted one (U-shaped), a Japan-style longer term stagnation (L-shaped) or a double-dip recession (W-shaped) if the coming tax rebate leads to a temporary pick-up in consumption in Q3.
As I have been repeating for months now the US debate is not anymore on whether we are going to have a soft landing (slow growth patch) or a hard landing (a recession) but rather on how hard the hard landing will be (i.e. how deep and severe the recession will be).
Today the Financial Times has a long and very good article titled “Road to Ruin? America Ponders the Depth of Its Downturn” that starts as follows:
What will be the shape of the US economic downturn? In recent months, the debate among economists has shifted from whether the US will have a recession to how deep and how long it will be.
Will it be a V-shaped recession – short, shallow and followed by a rapid return to normal rates of growth? Will it be U-shaped, in which the initial downturn is followed by a protracted period of weak growth and a slow return to the trend rate? Or could it even be an L-shaped recession – with economic weakness lasting for many years, as in the US during the Great Depression or Japan in the 1990s?
The article then goes on discussing whether the US recession will be V-shaped or U-shaped or L-shaped. As they say “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”…
And here is below my “The Shape of the US Recession” column…
The Shape of the US Recession by Nouriel Roubini
Now that it is clear that the US is in recession, the debate has moved on to whether it will be short and shallow or long and deep – a question that is as important for the rest of the world as it is for the US.
The answer depends on the shape of the US recession: if it is short and shallow, sufficient growth elsewhere will ensure only a slight global slowdown. But if the US recession is long and severe, the result could be outright recession in some countries (the United Kingdom, Spain, Ireland, Italy, and Japan), and even financial crises in vulnerable emerging-market economies.
In principle, the US recession could end up being shaped like a V, U, W, or L. Which of these four scenarios is most likely?
The current consensus is that the recession will be V-shaped – short and shallow – and thus similar to the US recessions in 1990-91 and 2001, which lasted eight months each. Most analysts forecast that GDP will contract in the first half of 2008 and recover in the second half of the year.
I expect a longer and deeper U-shaped recession, lasting at least 12 months and possibly as long as 18 months –- one of the most severe US recessions in decades – because today’s macroeconomic and financial conditions are far worse.
First, the US is experiencing its worst housing recession since the Great Depression, and the slump is not over. Construction of new homes has fallen about 50%, while new home sales are down more than 60%, creating a supply glut that is driving prices down sharply – 10% so far and probably another 10% this year and in 2009.
Already, $2.2tn of wealth has been wiped out, and about 8mn households have negative equity: their homes’ are worth less than their mortgages. By 2010, the fall in home prices will be close to 30% with $6.6tn of home equity destroyed and 21mn households – 40% of the 51mn with a mortgage – facing negative equity.
If owners walk away from their homes, credit losses could be $1tn or more, wiping out most of the US financial system’s capital and leading to a systemic banking crisis.
Second, in 2001, weak capital spending in the corporate sector (accounting for 10% of GDP) underpinned the contraction. Today, it is private consumption in the household sector (70% of GDP) that is in trouble. American consumers are shopped-out, saving-less, debt-burdened (136% of income, on average), and buffeted by many negative shocks.
Third, the US is experiencing its most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression. Losses are spreading from sub-prime to near-prime and prime mortgages, commercial mortgages, and unsecured consumer credit (credit cards, auto loans, student loans).
Total financial losses – including possibly $1tn in mortgages and related securitised products – could be as high as $1.7tn.
Given these staggering sums, the US could face a double-dip, W-shaped recession. The main question is whether the tax rebate that US households will receive in mid-2008 will be consumed – thus leading to positive third-quarter growth – or saved.
Given how financially stretched US households are, a good part of this tax rebate may be used to pay down high credit card balances (or other unsecured consumer credit) or to postpone mortgage delinquency.
Fortunately, an L-shaped period of protracted economic stagnation – Japan’s experience in the 1990’s – is unlikely. Japan waited almost two years after its asset bubble collapsed to ease monetary policy and provide a fiscal stimulus, whereas in the US both steps came early.
Moreover, whereas Japan postponed corporate and bank restructuring for years, in the US private and especially public efforts to restructure assets and firms will start faster and be more aggressive.
Still, given a severe financial crisis, declining home prices, and a credit crunch, the US is facing its longest and deepest recession in decades, dashing any hope of a soft landing for the rest of the world. While a global recession will be averted, a severe growth slowdown will not.
Many European economies are already slowing, with some entering recession. China and Asia are particularly vulnerable, given their trade links to the US. And emerging markets will suffer once the US contraction and global slowdown undermines commodity prices. – Project Syndicate
Nouriel Roubini is Professor of Economics at New York University and Chairman of RGE Monitor (www.rgemonitor.com)
251 Responses to “The Shape of the US Recession: V or U or W or L-Shaped?”
HousingDepression • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:10 am
Me First?
HousingDepression • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:23 am
How awesome is it when Lawerence Yun (NAR) Is telling fed to stop cutting rates?Yun offered a caution. “With elevated inflation, the Federal Reserve should be extra careful about further rate cuts,” he said. “Mortgage interest rates, which do not move directly with Fed funds rates, may rise measurably and hurt the housing recovery if inflation gets out of hand. Monetary stimulus is plentiful – what is needed more at this point is a home buyer tax credit to get buyers off the sidelines and prevent the market from overshooting on the downside.”
Bob • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:25 am
NR, could you plese expand on your thoughts of what causes the consumer to be elevated out of their debt in such a short period of time? Combine that with the baby boomers retiring and it\’s very dificult to view a \’W\’ shaped recovery. What happens if we no longer consume at the rate we did just a few years ago? When does the downward spiral reverse and what causes it?
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:40 am
Written by Bob on 2008-04-22 09:25:01Shop till you drop. I hope I am wrong, but the US consumer will keep on spending every single penny (s)he can grab. It is an addiction. Datz the key: every single penny (s)he can grab. Stagnant income and now the CC (MEWs HELOCs CC maxed out) will change this for a while.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:49 am
The idea that speculators are driving the price of oil is not consistent with the math of the current situation:- from the Committment of Traders Report (COT), the sum of the net longs for both categories of speculators is 70,000 barrels- this equates to 70,000 x 1,000 barrels per contract = 70,000,000 barrels- of this, about 2% will actually take delivery, the other 98% negate their purchases with sales – 2% of 70,000,000 barrels equates to 1.4 million barrels- on any given day, the demand is about 86 million barrels- therefore, the demand due to speculators is about 1.6%- therefore the price increase due to speculators is about $2 per barrel out of the current price of about $117 per barrel
tutterfrut • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:49 am
EUR-USD 1.5985With all those corporate currency profits, the risk looms to get addicted to an ever lower dollar…
Mark • April 22nd, 2008 at 9:54 am
Written by Bob on 2008-04-22 09:25:01What happens if we no longer consume at the rate we did just a few years ago? When does the downward spiral reverse and what causes it?Shh! We\’re not supposed to talk about that. Please stay on script!This got me to thinking… perhaps this is the decoupling that all the pundits are talking about, the decoupling of the US consumer from the US economy?Mark (the original? one)
KJS • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:14 am
Written by Guest on 2008-04-22 09:49:18I wouldn\’t be so quick to proffer such a strikingly linear relationship for the impact of speculators on oil. Even if their notional impact is minimal in the market, sometimes it only takes a small shock or addition to destroy an equilibrium. (i.e. they could be the piece of straw that broke the camels back)
Prt1stAskQLater • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:25 am
Way back in Nov. \’07 as respected Prof. Roubini predicted a hard landing and a $1 trillion in losses …http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/228079/ … I noted that \"If the US has pneumonia, ROW (Rest of World) ex China will not just catch a cold; it will loose a lung!\" and that Europe will get killed in the cross-fire …http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/226943/With even China\’s Shanghai index going for buy 1 get one free (half off), we\’re right on track for some good ol\’ US Alpha (being relatively better off); if we see a U shaped recession, the global recession will be … umm … \’a bungee jump with the cord cut off\’ shaped? Enjoy the ride! Print First Ask Questions Later.P.S. I was fun watching the BoE pull the rug under London Banker by doing some chopper-sized printing. He\’s had no option but to justify the move! I even remember tommy boy running to Uncle Sam when the sight of a Messerschmitt upset his tea-time.
ignatius • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:33 am
Euro above $1.6!!!EUR/USD just broke the 1.6 barrier. Today\’s high so far 1.6006.
ptm • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:34 am
Nouriel Roubini: The article then goes on discussing whether the US recession will be V-shaped or U-shaped or L-shaped. As they say “imitation is the sincerest form of flattery\"…Posting on the internet is the ultimate selfless act for an academic. For NR to post his knowledge is equivalent to throwing power and money to wind. My hat off to you professor for your intellectual generosity!
Hubbs • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:55 am
I am not so sure people are going to just walk away from homes to the extent NR indicates, even assuming no special assistance comes from the govt. If homeowners start to realize that so many like them are in default, and that it will cost the banks as much to foreclose, maintain, rent the foreclosed property, or repair vandalized empty homes as it does to let homeowners exist in their homes as squatters, or at best at reduced debt repayment schedules. It is a hassle to relocate, especially if one has no job prospects at his new location, and one certainly can\’t afford to buy even a distressed foreclosed house in a new location because he can\’t get loans. If banks decide to become landlords, then the increase in number of rental properties would drive rents down, No? making it even less profitable for banks to rent. I guess this defiance reaction is similar to the loss of individuality that occurs when people become part of a mob.The shape of a recession? How about a gentle \\ ? Just a gradual erosion of standard of living, with just enough foreign money coming in to snap up property, companies, and other hard assets for the US to just chug along just above stall speed,and for a longer time, like a generation?
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:59 am
On Bloomberg, Ethan Harris chief LEH economist has been on for a while. I didn\’t watch the whole thing, but from whatever little I did, IMO, He is close to the Prof\’s views, at least he is not a V guy. FED will stop lowering rates over summer but once the rebate checks stop working they will essentially have to go down to 1%. Inflation, it will moderate with the slowdown. it is always a bit high when entering a recession.
HousingDepression • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:01 am
Oil at 119.50! More rate cuts on the way.
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:09 am
It looks like Goldilocks may take a one-day-break. if we get to see the indices dropping 1% (they are not there yet) on all the bad news and $120 oil that would be quite a milestone.
Mark • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:12 am
Here\’s more fodder for why we can expect a continued decline. We\’re being braced/programmed for continued decreasing earnings (\"let\’s get rid of the quarterly forecasts\" soon to be followed by the \"let\’s get rid of the yearly forecasts\"). Granted, forecasts are a bit silly, but aren\’t they a big component of the casino, and wouldn\’t backing away from them likely reduce business (primarily transactions)?http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=apQUkLyvXWSA&refer=homeMark (the original? one)
Miss America • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:14 am
@ LB and all…Though the swap facility has been in the works for some time and talked about in the press, The BoE’s official announcement yesterday, coupled with the recent news today about:http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/rbs-plans-237-bln-stock/story.aspx?guid=%7BFD4A068D%2D1614%2D4CCC%2D915C%2D9096F61D46BB%7Dhttp://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/barclays-hbos-may-next-seek/story.aspx?guid=%7BFA1817B2%2D728F%2D44E8%2D9366%2DB309883A8120%7D…looks to me to be less about the public. The timing along with the shortfalls appears to be in line with typical “cronyism” we have seen here in the US. LB, you stated that: “it is carefully targeted to ensure that mortgage finance is available to those banks willing to lend on new mortgages going forward”I’ll just have to agree to disagree on this. IMO, It’s aimed at protecting the Financials balance sheets. …that’s it!Which leads me to something else you stated about the US moves… “the money has poured into speculative plays on equities and commodities rather than supporting mortgage finance”. I have to disagree with this statement 100%. Once again, IMO, I believe this cash in the USA has also been aimed at protecting the Financials balance sheets. I have a nice view of market movement, and from my seat, I see speculative plays and risk appetite significantly down! (it may not stay like this for long, since market tension has also “TEMPORARIRLY “ subsided.)So with that said, you’ve thrown a lot of rocks across the pond at our glass house that are seeming less and less justified based on semantics over haircuts. (Your gift looks like it’s got much neater wrapping paper… but it’s that same sh#$% inside) . In addition, you’ve taken quite a few backhanded shots at the American culture that have grown a bit tiresome. With statement such as: “rather than the unilateral, screw the world US arrogance. Because our government can fall at any time, the ruling party has a huge incentive to fix problems rather than make them worse.” Statements like those, read very poorly. They indirectly imply that America isn’t as “capable” of fixing its problems. It’s not a good generalization. (I know your “American target” is the 1% / TPTB / crony’s) …lest you forget, America is “we the people” – and the other 99% who are equally as unhappy call for change. (Don’t discount 297million people’s ability and desire for change.) …and unprovoked comments like… “I\’d still rather be here than the USA, and expect we\’ll take the hard choices to make a good recovery possible.” ….all I’ve got to say about that one is… I think you need to read it again.LB, I know you’re for unity. (Peace, love and happiness and that whole thing.) …but sometimes your anti-america stuff goes against your own grains. (I’ve heard you really jump on posters for making hateful remarks (ex. rightofcenter) ….but the anti-america / america’s inability / etc… doesn’t fall too short of “hateful sounding” sometimes. (I doubt that is your intention?)As you already know, I’m a huge fan! Your financial analysis is brilliant. So I ask that you sway your political views away from your financial views to protect the integrity of your posts. We’re in this together!Miss Americap.s. As for the “shape” of our recession??? (I kinda think this is a silly “gimmicky / sound bite-ish” topic) I think (If forced to choose between available letters on my keyboard) we’re looking at a bunch of XXXXXXX, where any gain will directly be at the expense of something else (in an unparalleled way due to the constraints of our economic well being). So which thing are we defining with a letter? Equities-vs-Comodities? Treasuries-vs-inflation? GDP-vs-growth? As we know, these XXXXX’s always exist this way…. It’s just that whichever one’s prove to be most important, will likely have devastating results on its inverse component.
jkiss • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:30 am
From naked capitalism:Today, we had the biggest bank fundraising announced to date, RBS\’s hugely dilutive £12 billion equity sale (and that\’s in addition to £4 billion of asset sales). Reader Steve pointed us to a key item from the press release: the Scottish bank\’s writedowns are markedly deeper than those taken by US banks to date, suggesting that the worst is not over on this side of the Atlantic. They have marked their US Alt-As at 50% of face, subprime at 38%, and CMBS at 83%. Imagine if US banks marked like this…
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:32 am
U.S. housing slump may exceed Depression: ShillerNEW HAVEN, Conn. — An influential economist says the slump in the U.S. housing market could cause prices to fall more than they did in the Great Depression.Yale University economist Robert Shiller, pioneer of a widely watched home price index, says there\’s a good chance housing prices will fall further than the 30 per cent drop in the historic depression of the 1930s.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:34 am
12:24Futures Movers: Crude hits new intraday high of $119.74 a barrel
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:34 am
Ouch!Economist: Housing slump may exceed DepressionTuesday April 22, 12:22 pm ET By John Christoffersen, AP Business Writer excerptEconomist: Housing slump may exceed Depression, prompting needs for bailouts NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) — An influential economist who long predicted the housing market bubble cautioned Tuesday that the slump in the U.S. housing market could cause prices to fall more than they did in the Great Depression, and bailouts will be needed so millions don\’t lose their homes.Yale University economist Robert Shiller, pioneer of the widely watched Standard & Poor\’s/Case-Shiller home price index, said there\’s a good chance housing prices will fall further than the 30 percent drop in the historic depression of the 1930s. Home prices nationwide already have dropped 15 percent since their peak in 2006, he said. \"I think there is a scenario that they could be down substantially more,\" Shiller said during a speech at the New Haven Lawn Club. …\"Basically we\’re in uncharted territory,\" Shiller said. \"It seems we have developed a speculative culture about housing that never existed on a national basis before.\" …http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080422/economy_shiller.html?.v=2
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 am
Today: USD makes a new record low; oil makes a new record high.I think further Fed rate cuts will be off the table after next Wednesday, and I’m betting the stock market is not going to like it.
London STUD • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 am
Anti-Americanism has been around for a long, long time. Don\’t take LB too seriously, he simply can\’t help it.
MISS World • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:52 am
MISS AMERICA,You rather be in the USA. I totally understand. Specially when I count the number of countries where Americans are welcomed these days.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:55 am
12:52 Futures Movers: Crude hits new intraday high of $119.86 a barrelYou folks ready for th eperfect storm…it is here…stocks down 400 points today…
KJS • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Anti-americanism…There is nothing truly anti-american about stating that the US is less able to correct itself. Thats like remarking that the Soviet Union in the 1970s was unable to take corrective action – it is just an observation. Due to the different form of government and party system it is far more reasonable to expect that the US\’ ability to effect change within itself would be different from another country\’s.For a morbid example just look at the inability for presidents or congress to pass a universal healthcare bill. Most of the other industrialized countries instituted such systems decades ago with the lobbies in the US at the time balking at the \"increase in costs\" such a system would have. If anything depresses wages its the fact that employers have to pay into this fraudulent and the individual still has to pay out of pocket. The US government already doles out more money per capita for health related expenses than canada does… (sigh)Admitting that our system has flaws and taking corrective action regarding them should not be called anti-american, even if the criticism is from someone in another country. If anything, noticing what is wrong and pretending it is okay because of national pride should be considered anti-americanism. In the later example you HURT future generations of americans, the only thing hurt in the former is pride. Regards,KJS (a disheartened american)
Mark • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
And yet another sign of deteriorating economic conditions can be seen here in this blog with all the nationalist banter.The only managed solution is the \"one world government\" approach. Not saying that this is good or bad, but I will say that, due to conservation of energy principles, it won\’t work; centralized/concentrated power can\’t hold.Krugman\’s scenario #3 is right, and folks might want to start paying attention to Derrick Jensen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endgame_%28Derrick_Jensen_books%29).Mark (the original? one) [note: since the only other \"Mark\" hasn\'t posted in a long time, and that I believe that I was posting before he, on future posts I\'m going to resort to signing as just \"Mark\"]
BK • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
@ Written by London STUD on 2008-04-22 11:40:56@ Written by MISS World on 2008-04-22 11:52:01This is good old fashioned prejudice. I would never be anti-(insert person\’s country of origin here) specifically because they were from that country. That shows very close minded thinking and holds society (as in the whole world society in this discussion) back. I would think we should all try to avoid it. Maybe I find it easier to be open to people because I am from America and work in a place where many of my coworkers are from abroad. The funniest part about it (in this context) is I would say they are some of the most pro-America people I have ever met.That is a discussion for another place. I have been away for awhile. Glad to see old comments contributors still sticking around!
Miss America • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:40 pm
@ KJSI can take criticism. Especially when it comes to US policies/gov’t/etc… because I am a huge critic of it myself. We learn from our mistakes, so flaws are great to find. (If you imply that I a “pretending” things are “OK” for the purpose of “Pride”, then I suggest you go back and read a couple of my prior posts on this site) Healthcare is my personal #1 critique of our current woes. (…and if fixed could stand to correct our economy like no other fix, as costs will make up over 20% of our economy.) The reason I fired back is because I believe the BoE’s well timed move was TIMED PERFECTLY in coordination with the news releases of some of it’s financial institutions. That’s INSIDER stuff aimed at protecting those companies’ balance sheets, and its stock from panic/crunch or selloff. In a word: Cronyism!So the point I was more targeted at was calling a spade a spade. LB took shots at the US for making parallel moves. I think time will show just how parallel they were. And as for the “speculative spending”… I believe LB was flat out wrong. Care to dispute me?LB’s one of the “good guys”, and entitled to whatever opinion fits. …but for my money, LB’s best analysis come free of political/country shots. …and the way I read the last post of LB’s, there were IMO- unnecessary vinegar and generalizations. …but those are just my opinions. (I’ll still put whatever I’m currently working on, on hold to read whatever LB writes since I always value the insight.)Miss America
Capone • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:43 pm
When the people of the US can no longer afford to buy the stuff exported from China, how do the Chinese feel about the credit limit on the Chinese Platinum 21st Century Credit Card issued to the US government ? As long as the good people consume, the Chinese extend the limit indefinitely to the US government. Now the US government is sending the people the cash advance taken on their Chinese credit card to go buy stuff from Walmart. This seems to be a loop of Chinese money through the United States – a pointless loop.
London Banker • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Sorry, Miss America. It\’s not anti-Americanism, it\’s anti-American batshit crazyism. Unilateral foreign policy, cooked intelligence, torture, wars for oil, cronyist capitalism, fairytale bank balance sheets, lack of healthcare – all part of the same disease. Cure the disease and the anti-Americanism dries up too.You want to see what we see of America in Britain? Coming soon to a cinema or TV near me: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2008/apr/22/amnesty.ad.waterboardingI\’d be happy to trust the 297 million Americans who you say aren\’t batshit crazy, if they would elect someone who recognises the rule of law, the Constitution, the United Nations, the Geneva Conventions and international treaties once again. Maybe they should also elect some Congressmen who will conduct oversight of the SEC, Fed and OCC while they\’re at it. In the meanwhile, I remain a sceptic. At least here in London the newspapers are ripping Alastair Darling, Chancellor of the Exchequer, and Mervyn King, Governor of the BoE, this morning for bailing out banks while bonuses are still being paid.
Detlef Guertler • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:50 pm
@ Miss America, Print First Ask Questions Later: Reading your posts concerning LB made me remember Rich H\’s forecast here concerning Wall Street banks some months ago: They started to fight against the downturn together, but when things got heavier it becomes tribal war and everyone fights for his own survival. Maybe our countries will go that way, too. They did it in the 30s and destroyed the world economically – and afterwards my country tried to destroy physically what was left. Of course it would be better for all of us not to repeat that chapters of history, but, well, the economical imbalances (and financial debt burdens) seem to be even greater today than they were 80 years ago. In that case we kids on the blog may share the fate of the international socialist parties in WW1 and WW2: It\’s good to have the same economic analysis and nice people all over the world with similar views and minds – but it\’s almost impossible to keep such a protected environment if our countries start to fight each other in hot, cold, financial or trade wars. Communities become tribes. But even if this might happen sooner or later, please: not yet. No-one of us knows who is right. We\’re here to discuss.
Capone • April 22nd, 2008 at 12:58 pm
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TOTBORR?cid=50this is just funny… thanks to whomever it was who posted this link a while back
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:00 pm
@ Miss AmericaThe language you used in the post I remarked about seemed eerily similar to those who appeal to pride when neglecting to effect positive change for the people they supposedly lead. Those comments merely acted as a trigger to my venting about the seemingly countless individuals in our current government who make such appeals. I was merely attacking the parallels between the content of that particular sentence in that post and what I have read from others in similar contexts. From your response there appear to be few other parallels. I apologize if you took my comments to be conflating you with those blind to criticism. My attack was merely against the act of using anti-americanism to label any individual who criticizes america. And as other readers have remarked, this thread is best left for other discussion boards. My apologies all.~KJS
Capone • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:01 pm
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/TOTBORR?cid=50i suppose you could say they are going to make sure money is available for the banks – opposite of one of the great depression mistakes yah ? what are the consequences of taking this path now ?
London Banker • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:09 pm
And then again, the BoE may have done it right:LONDON (Thomson Financial) – The Bank of England\’s 50 billion pound lifeline to money markets should be \"very positive\" for the mortgage market, the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) said.Speaking after a meeting in Downing Street with UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, CML director general Michael Coogan said although the 50 billion pound plan should be \"only the starting point\", the funds should start flowing through the mortgage market \"shortly\".He said libor interbank lending rates should start to fall in the coming few weeks, feeding through into lower prices for mortgages.http://www.fxstreet.com/news/forex%2Dnews/article.aspx?StoryId=1401b969-2f30-40ad-99c8-8eab9b3fec53Written by London Banker
HousingDepression • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:12 pm
KJ, I think you are right about the rate cuts and the market not liking it. But I have seen instances where they did not cut (I think they cut 50 basis instead of 75 expected) and the markets went up because it showed that the fed is confident.I am not saying it will happen just that it CAN happen.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Bottom is in, here come da rally pigs to fry some shorties…
MA • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:29 pm
@ LBGuano aside… Here in America, the current regime has something like a 30% approval rating. …so it seems we are just as critical. You on the other hand have a Queen! (and King to be) Very nice. And how\’d you get that, eh? By exploiting the workers. By hanging on to outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society. Listen, strange women lyin\’ in ponds distributin\’ swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony!;)MAp.s. I have family in your neck of the woods. When we talk with them, one of the primary concerns is the current status of David and Posh Beckem. (no jokes) So, the shortcomings and ills of society are worldwide. Like I said, we’re in this together.p.p.s. Where on earth did you hear that line??? Batshit crazyism. I may have to steal it?
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:44 pm
For the FWIW file:How to tell the difference between inflation and deflation.My father, who passed away in November 2006, grew up in the GD (and also fought in North Africa and Europe during WW2) told me that during the depression you could buy a loaf of bread for a nickel and a half pound of bologna for a dime, but nobody had a dime to buy it with! I.e., there was no shortage of food, only money to buy it with.Now, as we see at Costco, there is a shortage of food, but not of dollars chasing it.So, as we all already know here, inflation is accelerating, and the previously predicted deflation is limited to real estate. What if anything, can turn this around and bring about general price deflation? Answer: Very high unemployment.In the GD unemployment approached 25%, and now it is about 5.1%. As the recession deepens this will almost certainly increase, but will it increase enough to turn inflation into deflation? That is the $64 trillion dollar question, but it seems very unlikely to me now.Bottom line, IMO: As the recession deepens and unemployment rise, inflation will become disinflation, but we will not see general price deflation.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:50 pm
2:45Crude closes at new record of $119.37 a barrel
Anonymous • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:54 pm
Soberinghttp://market-ticker.denninger.net/2008/04/philly-fed-leis-yuck-flash.html
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Hmmm….others beside myself not buying the OFHEO lies this morning…The February rise was \"pretty shocking,\" wrote Stephen Stanley, chief economist at RBS Greenwich Capital. \"We had not expected the intense declines seen around the turn of the year to last, but this abrupt turnaround is a little hard to believe,\" Stanley wrote.
Alessandro • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:00 pm
In his blog (here on RGE) Brad Setser addresses the real big problem the US and we all faces ahead. At some point China might want its money back (!) and they might not be that happy at collecting US pesos. Read the entire post is really good.Every passing day I\’m more in shock realizing how much of a house of cards the whole global economy has been for so many years.Ut-oh! Is China starting to blame the US for its currency losses?Mei Xinyu, a senior researcher under the Chinese commerce ministry… goes on to argue that if the US doesn\’t do more to defend the dollar, it is effectively defaulting on China.\"The negative results of the US dollar\’s decline are evident: the rising prices of all primary products, the intensified pressure on inflation globally, the confusion in the settlement of international transactions, etc. Worst of all, this is the US\’ disguised way of avoiding paying off its debts to foreign countries.It should be noted that the US is the biggest debtor country in the world…. By the end of 2006, the US\’ accumulated net debt overseas hit US$16 trillion. As most of the debts were calculated in US dollars, the US is actually welshing on its debts malignantly by allowing the devaluation of US dollars. Since China is the country with the world\’s biggest foreign exchange reserves, most of which are calculated in US dollars, China thus is hurt most greatly from the US dollar devaluation.\"http://www.rgemonitor.com/setser-monitor/252511/ut-oh-is-china-starting-to-blame-the-us-for-its-currency-losses/
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:02 pm
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2ef9698e-0fbf-11dd-8871-0000779fd2ac.htmlRoad to Ruin
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:04 pm
HousingDepression on 2008-04-22 13:12:58“I think you are right about the rate cuts and the market not liking it. But I have seen instances where they did not cut (I think they cut 50 basis instead of 75 expected) and the markets went up because it showed that the fed is confident.”Absolutely it is possible, and I would be disappointed, but not surprised if the market did rally on news that the Fed had changed its bias or had cut only by 25bps or even no cut at all. The view that would cause such a reaction would be that the economy is strong enough so further rates cuts are not needed, and that a rebound in the second half is a near certainty. But it seems to me only a lunatic could believe such a fairy tale in this environment. The economic situation seems to have worsened now and has become an inescapable lose / lose situation: cut rates and we get killed with inflation and a crashing dollar; don’t cut and the economy becomes even worse than it would in a more accommodative / stimulative rate environment.We (and the Fed) have been between a rock and a hard place for many months already, and now it appears we are being squeezed in a vise – something has got to give soon – and when it does, it may be dramatic. But what form that sudden break will take, I don’t know. Either a burst of inflation / blow-off spike in oil prices / dollar crash, OR a quickly collapsing economy with rapidly rising unemployment and a crashing stock market.Of course that is all just my speculation…
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:06 pm
Inflation is RAMPANT!!!3:04[RCL] Royal Caribbean to charge $8 a person a day for fuel
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:07 pm
THe double bottom kids arrive right on time as usual…
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:07 pm
2:59 SunTrust\’s profit falls 45% as credit provisions rise
Gloomy • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:10 pm
@LB Thanks for your response to my question. Obviously the B of E move is quite similar to the Fed, all though I\’ll take you at your word that the details were better. To me the main point is that, like U.S. banks, the U.K. banks are holding paper that is garbage. If it wasn\’t, they would be able to sell it on the open market and wouldn\’t need the new program. As in the U.S., banks should be forced to recognize their losses immediately and not hide them at the central bank. If this action would cause widespread bank failures and nationalization, so be it. Government should see to it that all is handled in an orderly fashion. This garbage paper is going to keep decreasing in value as foreclosures increase and, as a result,these government interventions are only going to worsen things later. What is needed is to air out all the dirty laundry now, take our lumps, and make new rules so this doesn\’t happen again. All this government intervention will only greatly prolong this crisis and make it much worse than it already is. Sooner or later, the piper will have to be paid.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:15 pm
There are too many homes on the market, says MarketWatch\’s Steve Kerch. He sees storm clouds continuing to torment the home front.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:16 pm
We are one terrorist attack away from $150 oil…just one disruptive attack away…
Sean • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:19 pm
Funny no one talked about the criminal tactics of BoE lending 50 Billion pounds. The most imporatn aspect here is the 1-year and 3-year ATUOMATIC RENEWAL loan term . I have never heard and seen anything like this. Sooner or later, FED is going to come up 100-year fixed loan to Citi/MER/Goldman at 1%, or way Negative after inflation adjustment. FED and BoE are REALLY trying to give money away.As I said many times in the past, once FED started to expand the usual 14-days repo to 90 days and unlimited renewal, look out for newer further out loan term so that the banks can buy time to absorb the losses, all at the expense of middle class inflation squeeze.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:20 pm
The bank index is unchanged for the day LOL
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:22 pm
If you want to see intervention look at the gold price over the last few weeks! The perfect combo for gold (falling dollar and rising oil) has the spot price for gold down today…again. The CFTC looks the other way while the \"4 or less\" traders hold 65% of the short futures position. This is blatant collusion yet the traders continue to give the middle finger to honest investors while the watchdog goes back to sleep. Of course, the government and fed don\’t want people to think gold as money now do they.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm
dark pools – do they increase volitility or decrease it ? anyone done a study on this?
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:23 pm
Ouch! Just lost a post!Wow! Quite an exchange above! I am glad I happened during my siesta time.Miss A: Good observation on risk aversion. goes in line with the SS number (State Street Investor Confidence Index) of 72.8http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ecalendar/index.htmlDG wrote: \"trade wars\": coming soon to a theater near you:-)It is amazing! All the bad news and the DOW SP500 are just struggling around the -1% mark. When they break, they are gonna break big time; and Benny will get bery bery bery nervous.
Alessandro • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:24 pm
@Octavio, Giraf and allI have a question and I would like someone with more knowledge of history help me understand.Is there anybody here who would put his money in 30 years US bonds with the intent to held them to maturity? Beside the ridiculous return I\’m interested in the perception on the safety of the principal.My real point is: do somebody here expect the US to actually honor its obligation 30 years from now with something of as much value as today? (or at lease as much value as any other investment available today of comparable maturity?)Taking into account: huge debt and rising, debt has been mostly used for consumption not productive investment (!), almost sure stress with current creditors, probable loosing of the super-power status at the end of this crisis, only 300m people in a global economy, etc.On the other plate I see: nuclear bombs and military (but most need oil!), scientific and technological leadership (but not in green stuff that will become more relevant in the future), corporate America (how much will still be owned by americans after all is said and done?).30 years are a long time. I, as an investor, would not touch a 30 years US bond with a 10 foots pole. Is there anybody here that would? and why?(BTW: it\’s not anti-Americanism, at this moment I would not touch a 10 year Italian bond either
)Written by Alessandro
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Written by Alessandro on 2008-04-22 14:24:22The guy may turn up to be totally wrong but Gary Shilling is a big fan of the 30 year US Treasury Stripped (i.e., zero coupon) bond. According to him yield will come down to 3% so that would give you a return of over 30% at which time I would sell. I am 6% into: U S TREAS SEC STRIPPED INT PMT 0.000% 11/15/2027 TINT As GS says, these are not for wimps. They give you a hell of a roller coaster ride!
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:35 pm
I mean, this is silly, DowSP500 less than 1% down!
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:37 pm
Allessandro, there are institutions out their like pension funds and insuarance companies who need to fund their long term liabilities and this is the vehicle for them. It is the highyest yielding part of the yield curve and it is \"risk free\" in that the US can print money at any time to make good on the bonds. For everyday Joe\’s and Jane\’s, they have no business owning 30 year paper unless we return to the 1980\’s, then buy \’em hand over fist!
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm
Octavio, I agree. I have fair value today (even using the bogus street est 52 week forward est) of 1286. A full 6.4% or 88 S&P points under where we trade today.
KJS • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm
@Written by Alessandro on 2008-04-22 14:24:22I wouldn\’t buy and hold 30yr bonds. The world is quite unstable at the moment with economic and other power being shifted across the globe. If the US is to maintain its hegemony it will either have to engage in more numerous military actions or let its hegemony slip away. In either scenario I don\’t see it being in the interest of the U.S. to honor those obligations. Especially since those obligations will have arisen during a previous generation that did not effectively utilize the funds for the benefit of the future. Why should we expect future generations to toil under onerous interest rate payments to foreigners or others when they gained nothing for it? I don\’t expect them to and I think any investment choice that has that assumption may be regretted later.~KJS
MA • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:47 pm
FWIW OR, I see the 1% holding.…but I also see growing cash position. So unless there are some defaults on the way??? …or there are major (unadvertised) disruptions that are looming (thus fear is keeping the flow out of play???), we could see a bit more volatility kicking in pretty soon.Miss America
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:56 pm
\"The 12,700 save was sucessful Be..ooops, I mean Sir. Tomorrow…sure, fill our accounts and we can goose \’er for you.\" You want \’er up what…over 13,000, not a problem.\"
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:56 pm
Octavio Richetta on 2008-04-22 14:35:53“I mean, this is silly, DowSP500 less than 1% down!”Volume is low; selling conviction is weak. Things may be slow until we / they get some indication next week whether or not the Fed is going to switch to fighting inflation.
Alessandro • April 22nd, 2008 at 2:57 pm
@Octavio Richetta on 2008-04-22 14:33:49I\’m interested to know if you would buy them \’with the intent to held them to maturity\’. Selling at 3% is speculation and I see why people may bet on that.@Guest on 2008-04-22 14:37:37This is the reason I compared to other investments, I would not consider being payed in Weimar Marks as good performance.As for pension founds, they are ok, as long as they have dollar denominated liabilities they don\’t care about a dollar collapse. People do care.@KJSthanks for the answer
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 3:06 pm
Written by Alessandro on 2008-04-22 14:57:50The minute I see that babe hit 3%, if it ever happens, I sell. perhaps, it will be at a time equities are priced at more decent levels.So Dow/SP500 down less than 1%. What would they do if we had, no good news, just less bad news?:-)
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 3:18 pm
DJ Yum! Brands 1Q Net $254M Vs Net $194M, +31% >YUMDJ Yum! Brands 1Q EPS 50c Vs EPS 35c >YUMYum! Brands Boosts FY EPs Growth View To 11% From 10%, Ex-Items>YUMtrading higher AHMaybe mostly international growth?
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 3:22 pm
Comedy at the CFTC Meeting today. Nothing but lip service to problems in the futures markets. Start with the CFTC commissioner, a key supporter of the Enron Loophole in the Commodities Modernization Act of 2000, Put the Fox in Charge of the Henhouse and wonder why nothing changes.
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Just browse through this. Even in the US same store sales grew 3%. They revamped their marketing strategy plus you may be seeing a WAl-Mart type move from more expensive restaurants to cheapo places. Growing businesses (e.g., Google) are not good examples to use as bell-weathers for the economyhttp://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080422/20080422006614.html?.v=1Yum! Brands Inc., based in Louisville, Kentucky, is the world’s largest restaurant company in terms of system restaurants with over 35,000 restaurants, which includes over 2,000 licensed restaurants, in more than 100 countries and territories. Four of the company’s restaurant brands — KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell and Long John Silver’s — are the global leaders of the chicken, pizza, Mexican-style food and quick-service seafood categories respectively. Yum! Brands is the worldwide leader in multibranding, which offers consumers more choice and convenience at one restaurant location from a combination of KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, A&W or Long John Silver’s brands. The company and its franchisees today operate over 3,500 multibrand restaurants. Outside the United States in 2007, the Yum! Brands’ system opened about three new restaurants each day of the year, making it one of the fastest growing retailers in the world.
Alessandro • April 22nd, 2008 at 3:32 pm
@Miss Americayou are always so cryptic. At least to a non-native speaker.Call a spade a spade, are you calling a top? My life savings are waiting just for your word…(Just kidding, don\’t worry
Capone San • April 22nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Professor, I am not sure the English alphabet has a letter to describe what is coming. Perhaps, a symbol from either the Chinese or Japanese is in order. In the mean time, the current environment is an \"O\". All are running in circles wondering which direction things will turn once the circle of trust is broken…
HousingDepression • April 22nd, 2008 at 4:52 pm
From Paul KrugmanApril 22, 2008, 1:49 pm Ho-hum day on the marketsEh, oil’s above $119, the euro’s above $1.60, and the scramble for safety has sent the yield on one-month Treasuries down to 0.59%. Nothing to see here.Seriously, these are wild and crazy times.
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 4:56 pm
We should get earnings from UPS and Ambac in the AM; both will be important,IMO. If the economy is slowing significantly, I think it should be showing up in UPS revenue and guidance. If not then the whole recession thing must just be in our heads! Or, on the other hand, could the effect be masked by the increasing percentage of retail sales online?
Tadoichi • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Capone San(D)ecession will be like long curved samurai sword in Gedan position, sharp slashing upward then Jodan long deep sweep downward. Much blood will flow…US Economy has loyal retainers in FED/Treas who will decapitate any lippy me-no-shita hitobito (like shorts or ETFers),but like 49 samurai will eventually die and fail.Or, if you like, Economy like Chinese water radical which sweep from high to plunge on long slowly descending tail. Lazy, leisure sotted round-eyes will not know how to survive such alteration in lifestyle. Stoic, stiff-upper-lip, quiet suffering not in their nature. Shall be amusing and pitiful–for life is to suffer and transcend. Silly westerners think it is to self-actualize, find happiness, indulge themselves. Ha-ha, silly barbarians who have reached too far for apple high in tree, fall will be harsh and interrupted only by rib-breaking branches. See you on ground gold- and red-hairs, we shall stand astride you in contained amusement.
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Housing Wire: Moody’s Downgrades 1,923 Subprime RMBS Classes From Paul Jackson at Housing Wire: Stick a Fork in It: Moody’s Downgrades 1,923 Subprime RMBS Classes — In Just Two Days Between Monday and Tuesday, calculations by Housing Wire show that the rating agency has slashed ratings on 1,923 tranches from 232 seperate subprime RMBS deals from 2005-2007 vintages. That total includes hundreds of formerly Aaa-rated securities …The downgrades surely tally into the multiple of billions worth of subprime debt, and portend additional earnings pain for many market participants — write-downs on the value of RMBS in a portfolio usually aren’t marked up until a downgrade takes place.Is it Friday yet?
K J Foehr • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
Off-topic: for political junkiesThis Pennsylvania primary is a really big deal for the Dems. It could be the deal maker or breaker for Obama. IMO, if Hillary whoops him bad, his hand is going to be seriously weakened as far as his electibility in the Fall looks, and then the party may decide to go with her. And although she would definitely be better than McCain in my book, I would still much prefer to see Obama as president. He is further removed from the influence of special interests than any candidate I can remember since 1960. And, a president like that is the kind of change we really need in this country.
the Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:35 pm
Calling all the bleeting sheep. Assume the position.
the Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:39 pm
The sheep have an election soon. Will they vote for sheepherder #1 or sheepherder #2. Choose wisely.
the Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:41 pm
The wolves will be culling the flock soon. It\’s the Law.
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:44 pm
Written by K J Foehr on 2008-04-22 16:56:25A nice follow-up to your last two posts. UPS, FedEx Decline Points to Continuing Recession (Update2) http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a47LjRtOU3c0&refer=home
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 5:58 pm
Interesting article on Gold/Silver.http://www.kitco.com/ind/Wallenwein/apr212008.html
ptm • April 22nd, 2008 at 6:09 pm
http://mises.org/story/2940 – The Price of Gas from 1950 to today…First, we need to take into account inflation. The result of the Federal Reserve printing too much money is a loss of purchasing power of the dollar: something that cost $1.00 in 1950 would cost about $8.78 today. As for gas prices, in 1950 the price of gas was approximately 30 cents per gallon. Adjusted for inflation, a gallon of gas today should cost right at $2.64, assuming taxes are the same.But taxes have not stayed the same. The tax per gallon of gas in 1950 was roughly 1.5% of the price. Today, federal, state, and local taxes account for approximately 20% of gas\’s posted price. Taking inflation and the increase in taxes into account (assuming no change in supply or demand) the same gallon of gas that cost 30 cents in 1950 should today cost about $3.13….due to government regulation, the last oil refinery built in the United States was completed in 1976. In addition, the Middle East is politically unstable which leads to a risk premium on the world\’s major source of oil. It is obvious that the demand for oil has grown while supplies have been restricted. The average price of gas in the United States today is approximately $3.25. The question is, why are gas prices not higher than they are?
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 7:18 pm
A nice from Krugman on our recent discussion:http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/22/limits-to-growth-and-related-stuff/
Christopher • April 22nd, 2008 at 7:34 pm
Re Hubbs: \"The shape of a recession? How about a gentle \\ ? Just a gradual erosion of standard of living, with just enough foreign money coming in to snap up property, companies, and other hard assets for the US to just chug along just above stall speed,and for a longer time, like a generation?\"I tend to agree that the shape of this recession will be a \\ or a \\_ (a slide downward without a recovery). Whenever I try to make sense of what is going on in the world I put a make-believe \"elite\" hat on and think like an elitist and then everything makes sense.From this view, North Americans (and Europeans and Japanese) are way overpaid for the work they produce. The same work can be done and should be shifted to lower cost workers in China, Inda, Russia, Brazil. Globalization is like a big tub of water with water higher in some parts and lower in other parts. The water will reach equilibrium somehow at sometime. Wages and living standards will eventually reach a global equilibrium.I ofter discuss economics with an Indian friend that says: about 10% of the population of each country has a creative class that is intelligent and will do OK. This means 30 million Americans, 100 million Indians, 120 million Chinese, etc. This seems to make sense to me, in some way or another.
asm • April 22nd, 2008 at 8:12 pm
OIL MAY HIT 150 A Barrell THIS SUMMER. This is not goodhttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=acpwND3.n05g&refer=exclusive
4822 • April 22nd, 2008 at 8:47 pm
$150/barrel = $4.50 gallon gas
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:08 pm
Asian stocks are GREEENN!!frckin bi-polar mktsi think this is just a facadeto prove the recoupling theory is correct housing/real estate/commercial property valuation in asia is still largely at its peak (except japan..)forecasted GDP\’s for the region is still on the upside My gosh, when the truth starts to sink, the valuations (speculations), capital gain on their assets are gonna go **PPPOooOOFFF**
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:11 pm
oppss decoupling
Guest • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:33 pm
Hedge funds sloshing money (not their own) all around the world. Sound and fury signifying nothing.
Anonymous • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:33 pm
**off topic**I planted my garden on Sunday. Tomato and broccoli. On Monday I put up a fence to keep the critters from eating any more of my tomato plants. They loot like an angry mob – those animals!**on investing**I met a financial planner for lunch last week. He is a nice guy – you know, cuff-links and a “fun” tie looking to pick up some assets or make a life insurance sale. We chatted about 401(k)s, diversification, insurance, fees, etc. He had an air about him that he knew the markets better than I would ever know them and that his clients generally meet or beat the overall market returns. He said diversify. I said “concentrate investments to generate wealth, diversify to preserve wealth” He said the market will do well in the second half of the year. I said I probably agree if you are talking about 2009. He said the Fed has got it under control. I said the only thing the Fed has under control is the MSM. He said that he has access to mutual fund advisors that I don’t have access to unless I go through a broker. I said that we use ETFs because the fees are low. He said that if I had a good advisor (like him), that I wouldn’t need to worry about these things. I said I like to be well informed about things that impact my finances. He asked who manages my money. I said I do. He asked if I know if I am doing a good job and meeting my financial objectives. I said I beat the S&P500 by “XXX bips” last year including cash drag, and I am beating it by better than “XXX bips” YTD. These are always fun interactions, and I come away feeling good about myself knowing that some widows and orphans paid a sales load and 12b-1 fees to buy my lunch.Now that’s some batshit crazyism.
Anonymous • April 22nd, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Refiners slow fuel production as profits dropNearly three-year low in utilization rate risks angering consumers, lawmakersBy Moming Zhou, MarketWatchLast update: 6:53 p.m. EDT April 21, 2008Print E-mail RSS Disable Live Quotes SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — A production slowdown at the nation\’s refineries, now operating at levels last seen in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, couldn\’t come at a more troublesome time for consumers watching pump prices flirt with $4 a gallon. http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/gasoline-refiners-slow-output-rate/story.aspx?guid=%7B6634214A-A8E7-423F-9A0A-C5119FC8661C%7D&dist=TNMostRead
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:10 pm
Where did this come from? I click on so much stuff, it is probably from a CR comment. In any event, when I read stuff like this, I find it very hard to accept bailouts for most mortgage holders. It looks like the abuses had no limits on either side.http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080413/NEWS/804130399
Octavio Richetta • April 22nd, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Written by Guest on 2008-04-22 22:08:49The new theory is that the CC is over and that local banks overseas never saw it. From NC:http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/credit-crunch-is-dead-long-live-credit.htmlInsight: Inflation a bigger threat than the credit crunchhttp://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5b3b6dde-0fb6-11dd-8871-0000779fd2ac.html
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 1:33 am
http://www.reuters.com/article/bondsNews/idUSN2231537320080422Bush: U.S. economy not in recession, in slowdownA wise man:-D
Andrew Bernhardt, St. Louis • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:57 am
Dude, \"the S\" of the american economy is very bad. Mortgage equity withdrawl is about zero, there goes consumer spending, no spending, means no earnings for corporations, so then there goes corporate profits, investment will slow too, government spending will have to be restrained after nearly trillion dollar annual deficits (to bomb the mountains of afghanastan and to invade iraq), the debt outstanding has doubled in eight years, the debt service (interest on the debt) is billions a day, the dollar reaches a new all time low daily anymore, and commodities are thus surging…. housing is crashing, banks are going bankrupt, layoffs are increasing, labor force participation rates are deteriorating, unemployment is increasing, looks like we\’ll have a recession firing on all cylinders fairly strongly! Hide in fixed income… inflation linked fixed income (ticker: TIP), and also emerging market government fixed income (tickers: EMB & PCY). Equities will get trashed as we head into the April 30th GDP report, which I think will indicate negative growth, aka a contraction of GDP, and I think Q2 will be worse. Maybe equities will be lower around July/August/Sept, that may be the best time to get out of fixed income, and back into equities. Who is going to bail the Federal Reserve and Treasury out, when it has 9.4 Trillion of debt, and borrows for everything, from repayment of principal, to interest, to government wages, to wars, and even bombing the mountains of afghanastan??? Who will bail them out??
Andrew Bernhardt • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:02 am
Oh, and is it just me, or does it literally seem like \"another day, another all time low for the US Dollar\"?? The dollar has lost half (yes, literally half [as in 50%] of it\’s value) over the past eight years. Gee, look what massive-gigantic-enormous-huge-government deficits can do for the economy. Gee, if the US Dollar rose 100% Wednesday morning, it would just about be on par with where it was just eight years ago! Same (or really worse) for the Nasdaq Composite— just a 100% increase might take it back to where it was nominally, before adjusting for inflation!
Andrew Bernhardt • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:06 am
Gee, and the dollar loses value because of massive deficit spending, increases in the total government debt outstanding, the massive debt service due, because of the high and increasing debt to gdp ratio, because of accelerating inflation, because of low and decreasing gdp growth, and because interest rates are too low to attract capital flows back into the USA, and to top it off unemployment is rising while the labor force participation rate decreases too! The US Economy is doomed for decades due to George Bush!
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:11 am
Can someone smell a US Dollar crisis? Maybe a total default of the US Dollar?? Just remember it\’s the congressman and the president who are responsible for this! The President wrote the gigantic deficits, and the congress approved of it for literally eight years! They\’re all grossly fools for commiting financial negligence!!!
Guest What • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:38 am
Check this video out from George Carlin…one with illustration (narrated by GC) and one directly conducted by George himselfhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ4SSvVbhLw&feature=relatedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNv-oDbBZQU&feature=relatedLike it or not, americans are owned by their BIG Brother and their future are doomed…as evidenced by actions taken by the govt and fed reserve!Run for cover….if you can.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:52 am
I wonder who the Supreme Court will (elect) and rule as President of the United States of America next?? Who cares what the electorate does? Who cares who the people will vote for, maybe, like in the past, the conservative supreme court justices will just rule J. McCain as president of the united states of america. What a shame! What a republic we live in! It\’s like a bananna republic!
Prt1stAskQLater • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:37 am
Folks, Check this out …Triple-A Failurehttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/27/magazine/27Credit-t.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1(Copied the link separately since the a/href is not working and always points back to rgemonitor)Even MSM like NY Times has the audacity to say \"It may seem like a scam, but it’s not. \"Hello! If it seems like a scam, talks like a scam and performs like a scam, it\’s a scam. Hate to see that Moody\’s even violated BUffett\’s trust. Why is Moody\’s still in business and still around? Where are the regulators?Yeah sure, Moody\’s has said that they put up a disclaimer that they\’re just like a movie critic. But giving a \’AAA\’ label to an RMBS/CDO/CDO2 is like giving a 5-star tag to a cell in a maximum security prison.More from that article: \"Moody’s used statistical models to assess C.D.O.’s; it relied on historical patterns of default.\"I would hazard that is a blatant lie. Why didn\’t Moody\’s bother to first check on seasoned multi-year sub-prime performance? Somebody with a FICO Why did Moody\’s not take due care? The Fed needs to swap out the crap with treasurys and then shut down Moody\’s just like they shut down Bear. We can no longer take a price hit on homes like Shiller says; we need a political solution before the prime borrowers go for a toss. Shutdown the foreclosure courts for a while. We need a time-out. Print First Ask Questions Later.
Prt1stAskQLater • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:46 am
I used the \’less than\’ sign and the parser killed the rest of the sentence. It goes: I would hazard that is a blatant lie. Why didn\’t Moody\’s bother to first check of seasoned multi-year sub-prime performance? Somebody with a FICO less than 620 has probably already three credit strikes to their name. Defaulting on credit is like taking a life. Once you\’ve crossed the moral line, you\’re like to cross it again. Sub-prime borrowers had already crossed the line many times previously. Why did Moody\’s not take due care?
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 7:56 am
An important article all should read.http://www.gata.org/node/6241
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 8:05 am
A story that appeared in the Washington Post, and written by George F. Will… In the article, George Will takes the Fed to the woodshed for coming to the aid of Bear Stearns… He had lots to say, but I had to cut it down to a couple of snippets that apply to us… Here\’s George Will from the Washington Post…\"The Fed\’s mission is to preserve the currency as a store of value by preventing inflation. Its duty is not to avoid a recession at all costs. The Fed should not try to produce this or that rate of economic growth or unemployment.\"And this: \"A surge of inflation might mean the end of the world as we have known it. Twenty-six percent of the $9.4 trillion of U.S. debt is held by foreigners. Suppose they construe Fed policy as serving an unspoken (and unspeakable) U.S. interest in increasing inflation, which would amount to the slow devaluation – partial repudiation – of the nation\’s debts. If foreign holders of U.S. Treasury notes start to sell them, interest rates will have to spike to attract the foreign money that enables Americans to consume more than they produce.
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:19 am
Bondholders Lucky to Get 10 Cents in Looming Defaults (Update1) By Caroline SalasApril 23 (Bloomberg) — The looming wave of bankruptcies is unlikely to be kind to bondholders. And they have only themselves to blame. Rather than receiving the historical average recovery of 42 cents on the dollar in a default, owners of a third of high- yield, high-risk bonds rated B+ or lower may get no more than 10 cents, according to New York-based Fitch Ratings. About 22 percent are likely to get 11 cents to 30 cents. …http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601009&sid=ah5Lg9TW9B_M&refer=bond
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:22 am
Ambac Posts Loss on CDO Writedowns, New Business Drop (Update6)http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aUdfL3coqdvg&refer=homeMarket should fall big today. I know it is green now.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:23 am
That the Dog returns to his VomitAnd the Sow returns to her Mire,And the burnt Fool\’s bandaged fingerGoes wabbling back to the Fire; Nicole Elliott — insolvency v. liquidity; if you haven\’t got the currency right all your other investments are token. vvvvrp **raspberry** **double raspberry**http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=718978920&play=1
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:25 am
Anheuser-Busch net income falls 10:12 a.m. 04/23/2008 Provided by NEW YORK (Reuters) – Anheuser-Busch Cos Inc (BUD) reported lower quarterly profit on Wednesday, as U.S. retailers purchased less beer from wholesalers. The nation\’s largest brewer, with brands like Budweiser, Bud Light and Michelob, said first-quarter net income fell to $510.9 million from $517.5 million a year ago. But the company had fewer shares outstanding in the latest quarter, and per-share earnings rose to 71 cents from 67 cents a year ago. The St. Louis-based brewer faces a host of challenges, including higher costs for energy and grains and a shift in U.S. consumer tastes away from traditional domestic beer toward wine, spirits, foreign beers or small-batch \"craft\" beers. (Reporting by Martinne Geller, editing by Gerald E. McCormick) Copyright © Reuters 2005. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world
Anonymous • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:44 am
Buying time to clean up the books and absolutely betting on dollar devaluation. Otherwise this would be completely crazy!http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120891696070537057.html?mod=MKTW
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:50 am
Shiller\’s latest http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2008/04/22/yales-shiller-us-housing-slump-may-exceed-great-depression/?mod=WSJBlog
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:57 am
Octavio, I think stocks think they have all this writdown stuff covered so it just doesn\’t phase stocks anymore. A build-up in oil inventories (because the US is in recession and demand is plummeting) can send the Sow up 1oo points in no time! (by the way, those are 70 \"real\" Sow points when adjusted for the US Peso)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:58 am
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3_i72MGuhzY&refer=homeAccording to this guy market is cheap:-)…“The backdrop today is one of the market being quite fairly valued, and in fact I think it\’s a pretty low-risk entry point for investors,\’\’ Fritz Meyer, the Denver-based senior market strategist at Invesco Aim, which manages about $162 billion, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television. “When M&A activity starts to pick up it\’s an indication that the animal spirits in the market are rising.\’\’ The S&P 500 is trading at 21.8 times reported earnings, about 19 percent cheaper than the monthly average over the past 10 years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Of the 153 companies in the S&P 500 that have reported first-quarter results so far, 67 percent have posted earnings that topped analysts\’ estimates, according to data compiled by Bloomberg, even as average profits have slumped 29 percent…
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:01 am
Subprime borrowers could get a loan as long as their current mortgage or rental history was clean. Lenders wouldn\’t care if they were 6 mos behind on thier $15 credit card payment…as long as the mortgage was on time they could get a loan.
MA • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:03 am
@ ORMy whole \"multinat/cheap sticker price theory\" has plenty of holes. Beer faces inflation pressure not only on it’s grain, but also shipping and aluminum. …the inflating costs will cause those Multinats to potentially have a much sharper % price increase, but the net increase to the consumer will be manageable (IMO). Plus, (I think???) Bud owns a stake in China’s biggest beer. At the end of the day… good times, bad times, …there’s always money for beer!I’m not invested in anything, thus I haven’t done the homework I would if I were to start buying stocks. …it’s just that, I truly believe if things were to get ugly, this may be one of the best “wealth preservation” routes. …along with the fact that after enough losses are felt, speculation will eventually become less of a factor, and the market may start looking at earnings. In Buds defense, the sharp increase in cost (grain/inflation/speculation), probably hadn’t been priced into the cost on the shelf for most of the 1st qtr. There will likely be that increase to cover cost in the immediate future? (that is, if they haven’t already started jacking the price up a dollar or 2 per case already)Cheers and bottoms up, Miss America
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:07 am
Stocks sheap my a$$! That is if you believe estimates! Also for 2008, GAAP earnigs estiamtes are now running 52.47% higher than estimates for \"As Reported\" earnings. This means the quality of earnings is TERRIBLE! It is all accounting gimmikry that is infalting estimates for this year. The difference in valuation between these two numbers is roughly 600 S&P points now!!!! This is the greatest con game every pulled on investors by wall thief…
sam • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:09 am
walmart and costco are limiting rice purchases. Flour and cooking oil are in trouble, too. 3rd world country here we come.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:11 am
More socialist activity in the US:By John Spence, MarketWatchLast update: 8:29 a.m. EDT April 23, 2008Print E-mail RSS Disable Live Quotes BOSTON (MarketWatch) — The Securities and Exchange Commission turned down a congressional request to divulge why it cut off an investigation into whether Bear Stearns Cos. hurt investors by improperly determining the value of complex debt securities, The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.
Capone • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:15 am
on a minute by minute, hour by hour, day by day basis, it is NOT the news that drives price. The news comes out, the market price move occurs and then the daily story in the media is written. It is the reaction to the news that matters. What the market would have, could have or should have done or should be doing is completely irrelevant to what it IS doing AFTER news comes out.As Giraf mentioned quite clearly based on his experience as a trader, go with the flow. This applies on a minute by minute basis and as much as a day by day basis. @KJ Foehr, personally I am working on identifying the short term flow and it certainly presents a challenge for me.Intermediate to long term sure we are all dead, there will likely be a whole new set of rules to trade by, exchange resource etc. Most here including myself know this. Applying daily bad news expecting decline has not been going with the flow for the past few weeks. Will this change today or tomorrow who knows ? When the market moves up on bad news it is even more likely to continue up in the short term. When the market moves down on good news it is even more likely to continue down in the short term. Not to mention the fact the US lives under a financial dictatorship where people must invest or spend their money to protect its purchasing power. They control price or at least intervene with price. This recent rally is funny considering the very people who control price have been acknowleding bad economic conditions of late – Paulson for example while the market moves up.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:23 am
Uh-oh…teh Bush family must need more oil revenues…11:20 Crude reverses losses, up 33 cents to $118.4 a barrel
sam • April 23rd, 2008 at 10:29 am
Written by Guest on 2008-04-23 10:11:05The leaders of the SEC should be improsened. these are horrific times and that bs should not be allowed.
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 11:02 am
Written by MA on 2008-04-23 10:03:09It is my understanding that booze, smoke, casinos and related enterprises are among the most recession proof enterprises. Written by Guest on 2008-04-23 10:07:24Since we meet here o a daily basis, we bitch about the market daily. But deep inside we know we are patient bears that opt for a scale instead of a voting machine.
Mark • April 23rd, 2008 at 11:03 am
OS, thanks for the Anheuser-Busch info. Yet another point of reference highlighting the decoupling of the US consumer and Wall Street…Mark
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 11:10 am
http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.htm?clipSRC=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/vNx_7HTs4axY.asfBernanke should resign.
Anonymous • April 23rd, 2008 at 11:20 am
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/04/fed-continues-to-treat-symptoms-not.htmlStabilize patient before operating.
K J Foehr • April 23rd, 2008 at 11:39 am
Octavio Richetta on 2008-04-23 09:22:57“Ambac Posts Loss on CDO Writedowns, New Business Drop (Update6)Market should fall big today. I know it is green now.”ABK down 38% and MBI down 29%.I think you are right, and the market is beginning to notice. But, after the runup this morning, I would settle for a small fall today!
K J Foehr • April 23rd, 2008 at 11:51 am
Octavio Richetta on 2008-04-21 12:43:20 from a previous thread“How far can greed go, or I want all the toys now!If you look at what the US consumer was forced to do so that he could buy all the junk despite not having the income; you will realize that what capitalists were doing was accelerate the run down of the world resources. Jack up consumption as high as they possibly could so that they could get their wealth upfront, as fast as possible. I mean that is the ultimate show of greed. Rob the masses of their future wealth by scorching the earth. It was like putting thee economy on crack cocaine; burning the candle at both ends. Little guy has no money? No problema; Lend him the money, after they also own the banks so this is extra income! The model of economic well-being is going to have to change from maximizing GDP to something else. Given what we are doing to world resources, it would appear that a global slowdown would be a good starting point to ending the madness.”I just bumped into this post from Monday. It is an excellent summary of the big picture; well said!I would only add that the “run down of the world resources” was coincidental to the capitalists. They really don’t care what is used to generate profits; they will use anything: metals, oil, paper, digital bits and bytes, whatever they can sell. But the aggregate effect has been increased consumption of resources worldwide. Now suddenly we are being reminded of the importance and the limited supply of these resources. As we know, the West has been consuming more than our fair shares of these resources, and now we must share more of them with other people around the world who want to live like us. As a result we will be forced to pay more for ours and the global environment will continue to suffer. (Check out this BBC news video http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=7399182&ch=4226722&src=news)You wrote,“The model of economic well-being is going to have to change from maximizing GDP to something else.”Yes. So how about simply well-being without “economic”? In my view, the greatest joy comes from inner peace. This joy is the deeply felt contentment that comes from simply being without need for more. Being with friends and family, and with nature; being without striving for more of anything in an attempt to make better what is already sufficient. And that inner peace can be achieved with surprisingly little money and few material possessions.
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Written by K J Foehr on 2008-04-23 11:39:22Agree! I know discussing the market short term is a waste of time, but one of the nice things about retirement is that you can afford wasting time. Some days, such as today, I come to the conclusion that there is only so much logic/gravity defying the market can take, so I venture a bold opinion. I am now doing estate planing homework for US citizens residing overseas. I need to take care of this as being alive is the only necessary and sufficient condition for death. This I am doing from a hot tub using my wireless laptop:-)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 12:09 pm
Written by K J Foehr on 2008-04-23 11:51:44I just bumped into this post from Monday. It is an excellent summary of the big picture; well said!Gee! Wheee! I am glad someone finally noticed that one:-)it is my big picture for what has been going on in the US for the last 20 years.Yes, the greedy guys want all their gold now but they forget they are stuck here trapped with us in the same bubble (I mean the planet, not the ones we usually talk about here)
K J Foehr • April 23rd, 2008 at 12:17 pm
@ORI just covered my MBI at down 31% on the day! It feels great to have a good trade for a change; I haven\’t had one since Bear day!I just wanted to share / brag; thanks for reading…
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 12:28 pm
\"Yes. So how about simply well-being without “economic”? In my view, the greatest joy comes from inner peace. This joy is the deeply felt contentment that comes from simply being without need for more. Being with friends and family, and with nature; being without striving for more of anything in an attempt to make better what is already sufficient. And that inner peace can be achieved with surprisingly little money and few material possessions.\"Written by K J Foehr on 2008-04-23 11:51:44Great observation. One just needs enough money so that money is not a problem. I mean this on either side; too little or too much.BTW, a good chunk of my response to you is embedded in several past posts. e.g., I have dealt with the issue of stock market risk. The one I did not tackle, is looking at current PE, vis-a-vis historical PE to decide what the likely stock market return may be in the coming years. Smart people such as Bogle and Hussman write extensively about thishttp://www.vanguard.com/bogle_site/bogle_speeches.html I have two observation on this one:1. Using this kept me out of the market for the last 10 years and I won!2. The same argument could have been used to stay out of the market from the late 80s. Staying out of the market during those years would have been detrimental to your return. Unless Gary Shilling\’s a-posteriori analysis showing that if you bought the 30 year stripped bond pre-volcker, and rolled it into another 30 year bond every year you would have beaten the stock market by a lot!Treasurys Aren\’t For WimpsA. Gary Shilling, Insight 02.22.08, 4:00 PM EThttp://www.forbes.com/personalfinance/2008/02/22/treasury-bonds-inflation-pf-guru-in_ags_0222soapbox_inl.html…Few investors realize how well Treasurys have performed since their prices bottomed in October 1981. An investment of $100 in a 25-year zero coupon Treasury back then, rolled over annually to maintain the 25-year maturity, was worth $11,263 in October 2007. In contrast, $100 invested in the S&P 500 in July 1982 at the stock market\’s bottom, with reinvested dividend, was worth $2,821 last October. In the longest, strongest stock market rally on record, zero coupon Treasurys beat the S&P 500 by 4.1 times! So from 1 and 2 above one may infer that Malkiel continues to be right. I was out of the market for the last 10 years presumably because I am a smart investor. And I was in the market the previous 15 because I was lucky:-)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Written by K J Foehr on 2008-04-23 12:17:24Hope this is a good sign of bear treats to come:-)
MA • April 23rd, 2008 at 1:25 pm
@ Written by Alessandro on 2008-04-22 15:32:09Actually, what it means is that I’m getting a little concerned with the accuracy of my short term/not-break-13,000-DOW call.MA
K J Foehr • April 23rd, 2008 at 1:34 pm
@OR“BTW, a good chunk of my response to you is embedded in several past posts. e.g., I have dealt with the issue of stock market risk. The one I did not tackle, is looking at current PE, vis-a-vis historical PE to decide what the likely stock market return may be in the coming years. Smart people such as Bogle and Hussman write extensively about this”OK, thanks. I was wondering if there was going to be a follow up to the post last Friday on the Malkiel paper. I will review some of the other posts looking for more. But actually, I am too stubborn / independent to follow the work of others. I always want to figure things out myself. I have the attitude that if they can do it, then I can figure it out too. And if I’m going to do something, I am going to do it my way. Perhaps that is arrogant and/or stupid I know. But for me it is not about the money, it is about the challenge. And if I follow someone else’s ideas, then the challenge is removed. On the other hand, I recognize the importance of education: in learning what others think and then incorporating bits and pieces of others thinking into my own approach, so I will review your other posts. Further, I am pursuing a high risk strategy. I am trying to hit a home run or achieve consistent outsized returns or bust. I have no need of money after I am gone, so if I lose most of it, then I am not hurting anyone but myself. Therefore, much of what the academicians and people like Bogle advocate is much too conservative for me. I am not trying to play it safe and get rich slowly; I did that for about 30 years. Now I am conducting a high risk experiment for my own edification and enjoyment, although it causes much more pain than pleasure. That is why I will probably give up the high risk strategy at some point and enjoy some inner peace again!In a nutshell I am trying to play the big picture: bull or bear market, long or short, hot or cold industries, eliminate much of the specific stock risk, and leverage with double ETFs.Now it’s off to the woods for, “Of my three score years and ten”, XX will not come again. So about the woodlands I will go hunting morels among the fallen leaves!And then tennis this evening; retirement is rough.
Enjoy your hot tub!
Alessandro • April 23rd, 2008 at 1:34 pm
Miller Says Bear Stearns Sale Signaled End of Panic (Update1)April 23 (Bloomberg) — Bill Miller, the Legg Mason Inc. fund manager whose returns trail all but two rivals this year, said the collapse of Bear Stearns Cos. in March may have marked the end of a panic sparked by losses on subprime mortgages.“Credit spreads are already much improved since then,\’\’ Miller, 58, wrote in a letter to fund shareholders released by Baltimore-based Legg Mason today. Financial companies may “even have some write-ups in the second half instead of writedowns,\’\’ he wrote.http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=arSp8bnQ8vwU&refer=homeEU banks are not as sure, the 12m EURIBOR spiked up to the highst since the beginning of the crisis. Does anyone have a link of a chart of the EU verion of the TED spread?http://www.bof.fi/Stats/default.aspx?r=/tilastot/markkina-_ja_hallinnolliset_korot/euriborkorot_pv_chrt_en@MAouch!!
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Microsoft Rules Out Higher Yahoo Bid; Ballmer Says He Doesn\’t Need Company Microsoft Corp. Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer said he doesn\’t plan to raise his $44.6 billion offer for Yahoo! Inc., setting the stage for a fight to control the board that may start this weekend. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=atie.KrGMYWk&refer=newsActually, Ballmer should withdraw his offer. Hostile take overs of companies in which people are a key asset are not amenable to hostile takeovers.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 1:48 pm
This should rally stocks big into the close!!2:44 Crude ends up 23 cents at $118.30 a barrel
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:07 pm
Written by K J Foehr on 2008-04-23 13:34:37I do likewise in most important things in life. Do the research, seek advice; then, reach my own conclusions make my own decisions.IMO, risk management is very important, particularly in the short side; otherwise, sooner or later you will run into problems. The older you are, the less productive years ahead of you have. Risk management (i.e., capital preservATION) is particularly important if (like me) you don\’t ever want to have to roll up your sleeves again and have to do the kind of work that is not amenable to WB.Have you read KB\’s hedge hunters (just to mention one of the latest active investment management books that I find extremelly good)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Written by Guest on 2008-04-23 13:48:18Particularly good for Boeing and the airlines. Perhaps, this means airlines will have to retire fuel guzzling aircraft:-)
Detlef Guertler • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:21 pm
@ OR, KJF:If I remember Richard Layards book \"Happiness\" right there\’s a strong correlation between happiness and GDP – the higher the GDP per capita in a country the happier the people there. But that correlation only exists up to a GDP per capita of about the one of Portugal, i.e. between 15.000 and 20.000 USD per year, less than a half of US GDP. For the thirtysomething countries richer than Portugal there\’s simply no correlation between GDP and happiness, neither positive nor negative. That means: As long as economic growth can reduce hunger and absolute poverty it\’s the best you can do for your country. If these problems are solved, growth makes people feel richer, maybe even better, but not happier.Layard\’s consequence: To maximize happiness in the world, take the wealth from the better-than-Portugal countries and give it to the worse-than-Portugal countries.Taken as political program you probably maximize not happiness, but war and hatred in the world.But the way the world economy goes these days seems to be more or less towards such kind of global portugalization. The invisible hand of the market? Or are TPTB wiser than we thought?
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:25 pm
More great news for the economy…no wonder stocks continue to rally:Steel prices are up 72% from their peak last year, defying a slump in the construction and auto sectors, but squeezing industrial users.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:26 pm
I think the global inflation outbreak is a deliberate attempt by the US to get certain countries to unpeg form the US Peso…be careful what you wish for.
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:27 pm
\"We are now classifying this as a bull market,\" says Chuck Carlson of Horizon Investment Services. The \"forward-looking\" stock market is telling him that \"we\’ll start to see some improvement in corporate earnings later this year.\" For now, though, \"we do have kind of a sluggish economy, and where you\’ve seen the strong earnings coming out have been in those companies that have rather overseas businesses,\" says Carlson.
tutterfrut • April 23rd, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Wal-Mart\’s Sam\’s Club Restricts Purchase of Some Rice By Cotten TimberlakeApril 23 (Bloomberg) — Wal-Mart Stores Inc.\’s Sam\’s Club warehouse unit is restricting the purchase of some rice to four bags a visit because of “recent supply and demand trends.\’\'The limits on jasmine, basmati and long-grain white rice will take place in all U.S. stores where allowed by law and are effective immediately, Sam\’s Club spokeswoman Kristy Reed said today in an e-mailed statement.Some consumers have started hoarding rice, the food staple for half the world, as supplies shrink. Prices have soared as China, Vietnam, India and Egypt curbed sales abroad to safeguard domestic supplies and cool inflation. Thailand also may restrict shipments, a World Bank official said today. http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aXSMgDf2JeSw&refer=homeFour bags a visit…have you heard it Roubinies. So now STOP hoarding and STOP turning your houses in personal 7/11\’s. It\’s all under control. Better go buy some shares, unlimited per visit because nobody\’s thinking of hoarding them.
tutterfrut • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:04 pm
Rice Hoarding and Rebagging Exposedhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAWvBNPPIscRebagging things…reminds me of something that went very bad…
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:06 pm
next fraud investigation \"death flipping business\" American senior citizens life insurance, there\’s a chance a total stranger intends to be the beneficiary. These \"investors\" take advantage of a lack of U.S. laws that prevent them from making speculative investments on seniors\’ lives. Known as \"stranger-originated life insurance,\" or STOLIs, these policies are sold to investors who buy them at a discount of, say, 50 cents on the dollar payout. They then wait for the senior to die and collect their windfall. Although highly lucrative for investors — said to include reputable Wall Street firms — for the U.S. insurance industry, it\’s a growing worry. JARED MITCHELL | February 27, 2008 Macleans magazine
HousingDepression • April 23rd, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Apple beat EPS by 10 Cents…Yet it\’s stocks are trading down (Very Turbulent trading going on here). At last trade, they were down to 158.61 from 162.89!As I keep typing, the shares keep going down…
JLarkin • April 23rd, 2008 at 4:06 pm
Lost a post again!As I mentioned before, technology, aircraft, defense, oil are still doing well and providing some tailwinds to the economy. Still waiting for the MSM to report on the supply chain effects of automotive and housing recessions though. Just in time suppliers facing higher priced inputs and less demand for outputs must be hurting as the auto plants close or go on strike. It looks like airlines, municipalities, and commercial real estate are running into trouble now.
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Take a walk around CR. Bice stuff on Ambac/UPS
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Joe is Da\’ man! He is the Professor\’s cousin on the Finance side! He starts with Ambac and ends with….Competitive devaluations (what the US is doing), food riots and tariffs, Dat smells of depression… mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/vDcqfPrS6QcM.asf
Gloomy • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:10 pm
COMPLACENCY REACHES A ZENITH The stock market has reached a new pinnacle of complacency. Witness the reaction to Ambac\’s news today, which caused its shares to drop 40% and MBIA to drop 30%. A couple of months ago, panic would have ensued, with worries about the consequences of failures of these companies. Now, as more evidence of impending insolvency rears its head, the market shrugs its shoulders and climbs modestly higher. Big Brother will take care of it, just as they did with Bear. But the question is, how many balls can the Feds keep in the air at one time? The Fed itself has said that a number of small and medium sized banks will likely go under this year. While individually they may be relatively small, the coincident failure of several of these entities would have an impact rivaling that of a large bank failure. Also,the probability of another large bank failure increases daily, as credit card and consumer loans continue to sour at an alarming rate (see Bank of America) and more mortgage related writedowns are on the way (for example, Fitch downgraded billions more of subprime junk this week). The Fed must surely be making arrangements with the funeral home for the monolines. And let\’s not forget the big one: Fannie and Freddie will surely fail in the coming months. While I do not believe S&P will have the kahunas to downgrade treasuries from AAA as they threatened, the dollar will be stripped of all pretense of being anything but the American peso and the result will be the same as a downgrade. Then, there is the so called \"checkmate scenario\" which Mish has commented upon. As energy and food prices rise, at some point the Fed may face the prospect of 1) Lower or leave interest rates unchanged, which will lead to hyperinflation and then to depression, or 2) Raise interest rates, which will lead us into depression. Understand that all of the above is not a possibility, it is a likelihood. The Fed is certainly powerful, but I have strong doubts that any governental/quasi-governmental agency could manage all of the coming chaos. It is interesting to watch the complacent faces of market participants as the multiple wolves that will rip apart financial life as we know it approach. The Fed cannot possibly fend them all off.
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Written by Gloomy on 2008-04-23 17:10:31Gloomy, forgat to say, my previous post has your name written all over it:-)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:26 pm
GLoomy:\"how many balls can the Feds keep in the air at one time?…The Fed is certainly powerful, but I have strong doubts that any governental/quasi-governmental agency could manage all of the coming chaos. It is interesting to watch the complacent faces of market participants as the multiple wolves that will rip apart financial life as we know it approach. The Fed cannot possibly fend them all off. \"Trying to keep my pulse on things… My longer than usual multiple choice question:How much longer until the big ball of twine gets tangled-up again? a. one weekb. two weeksc. one monthd. two monthse. three monthsf. six monthsh. none of the above
Gloomy • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
@ORIMO in the Fall, the piper will be paid.Which post of yours were you refering to?
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:40 pm
This one is via BArley @ CR:Starbucks slashes outlook, blames housing meltdownhttp://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSWNAS919920080423Will WS care about this one? Those traders may be dumb but they sure know *bucks!Betcha somewhere a tree-killer prof. is working on the correlation between MEW and lattes sold.This one is good too:http://today.reuters.com/news/articleinvesting.aspx?view=CN&WTmodLOC=C3-News-2&symbol=SBUX.O&storyID=2008-04-23T221210Z_01_N23373436_RTRIDST_0_STARBUCKS-OUTLOOK-UPDATE-2.XML&type=qcna\"Starbucks shares fell to $15.69 in extended trading, after closing up 15 cents at $17.85 on Nasdaq. (Reporting by Nichola Groom and Lisa Baertlein, editing by Richard Chang)\"Another fad stock bites the dust. SBUX is out of sync with the new US economy. http://stocks.us.reuters.com/stocks/charts.asp?symbol=SBUX.OTomorrow won\’t be pretty for stocks:-)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:42 pm
Written by Gloomy on 2008-04-23 17:33:03I meant Prof.\’s Mason video mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/vDcqfPrS6QcM.asf (via CR)Depression as a possibility all over the place from a guy who was a mild recession guy (according to himself)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:48 pm
Ouch! via GRIM at CR:Moody\’s downgrades GMAC, ResCap ratingsBy Wallace WitkowskiLast update: 6:23 p.m. EDT April 23, 2008http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/moodys-downgrades-gmac-rescap-ratings/story.aspx?guid=%7B74C09469%2D3FAF%2D4674%2DB4F1%2D2A64D56B2667%7D&dist=hplatest\"\’The rating agency lowered GMAC\’s senior rating to B2 from B1, and ResCap to Caa1 from B2.\"Diz one priced in the market too?
Gloomy • April 23rd, 2008 at 5:52 pm
@ORThanks. Notice how now we are starting to get a few guys starting to mention depression (although quickly backing away from it). I suspect many are worried about it, but afraid of making their concerns too explicit.
AfA • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:28 pm
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL2341693420080423\"Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has told Turkey that Israel was willing to give back Syria\’s Golan Heights in return for peace with the Arab state, a Syrian cabinet minister said on Wednesday.\"Another indication that war against Iran is coming. And Israel/US want to neutralize an old pro-Iranian beforehand.The Golan plateau was under the Israeli control since 1967 and they never intended to give it up. What changed today?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golan_Heights
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:38 pm
Humor from CR:TCA writes: So much good news today! Good thing we\’ve already reached bottom or I might begin to worry a bit!TCA | 04.23.08 – 6:48 pm | # On the food/rice shortages:4822 writes: \"Uncle Ben\’s Helicopter Rice\"4822 | 04.23.08 – 6:37 pm | # 4822 writes: I have in my possession a blank slip found in a fortune cookie six weeks ago. Some kind of omen?One part of me says to save it for a troubled day and write in my own fortune.4822 | 04.23.08 – 6:41 pm | # Periwinkle writes: CurlyDanI think we should all order our chinese food with NO rice. They give too much anyway, it isn\’t good for you and I throw away at least half. Then they will stop serving so much and have no need to hoard.Periwinkle | 04.23.08 – 6:41 pm |
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Hey, LB and others:You guys remember The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin?Lively, lovely show, or vice versa. The rise and fall of SBUX brought the title to mind:-)
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:44 pm
Everyone on vacation here?:-) I am taking my wife out to dinner. She just returned from Bs As. But I\’ll be back!
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 6:46 pm
For those of you who know the show but have forgotten the plot, this should bring good memories:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_and_Rise_of_Reginald_Perrin#Series_Summaries
J. • April 23rd, 2008 at 8:14 pm
@Guest on 2008-04-22 09:49:18,A better idea might be to look at a breakout of Index Traders positions and how these have changed over time. As the CFTC notes: \"These traders are drawn from the noncommercial and commercial categories.\" But, as that agency does not note, this particular group has, through a loophole, been able to circumvent CFTC and/or exchange set position limits that were originally put in place to prevent relatively small markets from being overwhelmed. I should add that this group has, for the last year, been broken out in the CFCT\’s supplement Commodity Index Traders (CIT) report, but only for \’select agricultural markets\’.Simply summing up, comparing, overall positions misses who does what for what reason and how.Read this: http://commitmentsoftraders.org/?p=32And, yes, on any given day world demand has been somewhat over 80 million barrels, which is not entirely crude oil but also condensates and bio-fuels. It is an error to believe that supply and demand in financial instruments such as futures must directly relate to the physical market, which is in fact a variety of markets for different grades of crude which are priced in reference to benchmark crudes such as WTI and Brent. It is equally erroneous to think that all contracts are physically settled — the vast majority are not. What we have are prices of physical being discovered/formed in not-physical markets (which include more than Nymex) and this has been the regime since 1986, though most long only fund reallocations towards commodities has only been since moreless early 2004, prior to which traditionals like hedge funds and CTAs dominated the speculative side.If it were only so simple as people have been led to believe…
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 8:47 pm
\"What we normally have is a predictable group of sellers and buyers — mainly farmers and silo operators,\" he says. But the landscape has changed since the influx of large index funds. Fund managers seek to maximize their profits using futures contracts, and prices, says Warner, \"keep climbing up and up.\"Troubling article on the role of speculators in the global food crisis:http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,549187,00.htmlSome experts now believe these investors have taken over the market, buying futures at unprecedented levels and driving up short-term prices. Since last August, this mechanism has led to a doubling in the price of rice — including the 500,000 tons that the Philippine government plans to buy in early May to address its own shortage….He\’s calculated that financial investors now hold the rights to two complete annual harvests of a type of grain traded in Chicago called \"soft red winter wheat.\"Wagner is stunned by such developments. He sees them as evidence that capitalism is literally consuming itself.
Gloomy • April 23rd, 2008 at 8:49 pm
BERNANKE AND BLACK HOLE IMMORTALITYThe banks are really the black holes of the economic universe. As the banks get new capital, are forced to take new writedowns and once again get new capital, huge quantities of capital are being sucked into these black holes. As their prices will continue to fall (see Meredith Whitney), and will not rise again for many years, this capital is lost. In a normal environment, black holes would die as a result of bankruptcy. However, under Bernanke larger black holes, such as Bank of America and JP Morgan, take over smaller black holes such as Countrywide and Bear, and suck down even more capital. So the banks are at the center of the credit crisis, not only because they are unable to lend, but because they are destroying capital at an astonishing pace.
little ann • April 23rd, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Please correct me if I\’m wrong but aren\’t these financials that support the Clearing Corp. and Markit, the same ones that brought this mess upon us in the first place? They\’re gonna clean up the CDS mess for us now!! http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120898696909739549.html?mod=mkts_main_todays_mkts_tac
Guest • April 23rd, 2008 at 8:55 pm
But now Rogers, of all people, is warning: \"Unless something happens soon, we will see people not getting any food at all, at any price. This is the sort of thing we read about in history books, but now I\’m afraid that it could happen again.\"From his perspective, though, the calamity is not the fault of investors like him, but of developing countries\’ policies — like imposing export bans and capping prices. This deprives farmers, who face rising costs of necessary items like fuel and fertilizer, of any incentive to produce more rice. \"I think this attitude is morally reprehensible,\" says Rogers. \"These governments would rather let people starve than allow prices to rise naturally.\" Removing price controls, he says, is the only way to increase rice production levels once again.Farmers, after all, wouldn\’t give away their rice to the poor, says Rogers. But he fails to explain how the poor should pay the higher prices in the first place. Perhaps it\’s up to politicians?
Mark • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:01 pm
Written by tutterfrut on 2008-04-23 14:44:52Four bags a visit…have you heard it Roubinies. So now STOP hoarding and STOP turning your houses in personal 7/11\’s. It\’s all under control. Better go buy some shares, unlimited per visit because nobody\’s thinking of hoarding them.Precious!Mark
Mark • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:10 pm
This deprives farmers, who face rising costs of necessary items like fuel and fertilizer, of any incentive to produce more rice….Farmers, after all, wouldn\’t give away their rice to the poor, says RogersWho really are the \"farmers?\"And anyway, this notion of JIT food production/distribution is going to go the way of the Dodo as fuel costs go up (and fuel production drops off). Better to start dropping this nonsense. Better to stop growing crops (reliant upon vast amounts of fossil fuels and GM corruption) that are primarily aimed at export. Better to stop forcing other countries to grow crops that aren\’t subsistence crops. This whole thing is out of balance. Trying to shift the \"global economy\" into some sort of balance is in direct conflict with physical reality.Those seeking to feed themselves rather than export food will be labeled as \"protectionists!\" Funny, what\’s so negative about protecting one\’s life?Sorry Mr. Rogers, but much of the blame lies with you and everyone else who is profiting off the misery of others.Time to start facing the music. Now all we need are some major crop failures (disease, pests, weather etc.) and we\’ve got that elusive population reduction that folks like rightofcenter are looking for (in other countries, not his/her own of course).Mark
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:20 pm
More CR: hopeinsd writes: on SBUX: What\’s killing them isn\’t the recession exactly. Its that every Suzy Orman style financial advisor out there spouts off about the \"latte factor\"- that spending $5 a day at Starbucks could instead be saved and, through the magic of compounding interest, keep you comfortable for a year in retirement. It was even on friggin Oprah! You can\’t fight Oprah! Now the \"savers\" avoiding Starbucks are probably still paying 25% interest on their credit cards, but, hey, at least they feel like they took the first steps and can tell their spouse their trying to cut back. hopeinsd | 04.23.08 – 7:04 pm | # barely writes: AMZN is a friggin RETAILER that needs diesel trucks and drivers to personally deliver every single item. Good business model with $120 oil. Gotta love their prospects! barely | 04.23.08 – 6:59 pm | # VHB writes: RE: SBUX. Well, at least they have stopped blaming these things on the weather. VHB | 04.23.08 – 7:21 pm | # iceman writes: Hmmh, if people are cutting back on coffee at Starbucks, do you think they\’d be buying new cars? And, with gas at $3.54, do you think most would buy anything other than a small car with high mpg? Rest of the year will be scary for the auto industry. iceman | 04.23.08 – 7:27 pm | # ShortCourage writes: Has anybody noticed a troubling trend with earnings? Those who\’ve done well have done so either (a) because they had nice gains from foreign sales and Forex gains or (b) because they deal in products jacked up in price, such as commodities producers. What happens when the lag of our consumer slowdown (and you can add the UK and other debtor nations to that as well) starts to hammer foreign companies and their consumers? And what happens when the commodities price jumps start to cause consumers worldwide to cut back on non-essentials? We\’ve got a major crash in world aggregate demand coming. I think IBM/CAT/AAPL strong earnings are the final spasm of this earnings bubble. ShortCourage | 04.23.08 – 7:41 pm |
Octavio Richetta • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:23 pm
Written by Guest on 2008-04-23 20:55:51Rogers is part of the elite that is squeezing the world. With no export controls the people of Argentina would starve.
J. • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:35 pm
@Guest on 2008-04-23 20:47:37CBOT Wheat as of 15 April: Index Traders were Long 218,225 contracts, Short 33,234 contracts; respectively 40.7% and 6.2% of total open interest. (1 contract = 5000 bushels). Looks, though as they may now be on the losing end; here\’s a long term chart on CBOT wheat:http://charts.marketcenter.com/cis/agweb?cont=W&period=m&size=760x400Now, if you think that\’s a spike, take a look at this for the much smaller Minneapolis Exchange that specializes in a different, high protein, grade of wheat:http://charts.marketcenter.com/cis/agweb?cont=MW&period=m&size=760×400(Both charts are monthly continuous)
AfA • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:39 pm
Sarkozy is making excuses to China under protests and I guess influence from Carrefour and LVMH. Gone are the days of France\’s human rights respect (at least in public) and came the days of blackmailing. I am really ashamed!Sarkozy and other \"leaders\" tried to use the Olympics to \"waterboarding\" China, for good or bad reasons, it is like taking someone\’s family hostage. I am really ashamed!
AfA • April 23rd, 2008 at 9:50 pm
My roommate, who is Chinese, told me yesterday that the chinese governmnet cut trading transaction taxes by 2/3rd which lead the increase in stocks yesterday.In fact the government has increased the tax threefold last year which coincided with the start of the rally down.
GSM • April 24th, 2008 at 12:30 am
MarkWritten by Mark on 2008-04-23 21:10:41“Sorry Mr. Rogers, but much of the blame lies with you and everyone else who is profiting off the misery of others.”A ludicrous proposition. There has always been some misguided and misinformed “common knowledge” of the romanticism of farming; wide blue sky’s, wholesome living, the outdoor life, tilling the fertile soil- yada yada….. The end result being an attitude of something akin to; “ boy, haven’t those farmers got it good, they are so dang lucky. They must be doing it for the love of it”. Taking advantage of someone like that does bring forth emotive responses.Now back to real life. Farming is a business, always will be. And when you have myriad Govt’s- starting with Uncle Sam- who are ENDLESSLY intervening in agriculture in a massive way , you are going to get regular f***ups. Just like now. The whole agriculture world is out of whack. Decades of wasteful subsidies in Eurozone, meddling with the US food markets in the name of green energy, US Govt massive tariffs and subsidy supports, a dollar that trashed, developing countries with burgeoning populations capping prices and imposing levies- regulating exports of food. Well , this witches brew of screw ups has meddled enough with the worlds food supply to create this god awful mess. The agriculture sector is under severe pressure , overburdened with this “help”, struggling to find profits – all at a time when the population of middle class mouths is skyrocketing worldwide. Blaming the evil speculator is delusional. What is happening is a flight to all forms of investment safety. As this horrendous debt bubble, fueled and enabled by a dozy Fed ,all kinds of voodoo accounting and bankster greed, people are putting more money into real things- you know the real things? Touch, see, feel, smell, MEASURE, consume, necessities. After witnessing the appalling failure of IB’s and the corrupt compliance of their godfathers at the Fed and .gov who are basically collapsing the US currency, a bit of simple transparency is welcomed I would bet. Especially if you have hundreds of billions in worthless US paper sitting on your books.The food price situation is a symptom. A symptom of the same misguided maladjusted world economy created and enabled by the greedy TPTB who think they can scam their way through life living off people like you and me Mark. If you’re looking to lay blame, that is where you should be headed. Rogers is a messenger- we all should at least listen.
Stormy • April 24th, 2008 at 12:35 am
\"We\’ve got a major crash in world aggregate demand coming.\"–certainly with some goods, when energy and food are going through the roof. This is a crash quite unlike any other. Coal shortages in China, a presumed net exporter of coal? The ME blaming the falling American dollar for its refusal to pump more oil? Well, they peg to the dollar. How much can it really pump anyway?Could it be that resources are being stretched thin? In we are using land for oil (ethanol), and that does not solve the oil problem but only creates another…what do we say then?And if a is the shape of the coming recession, what in the world pulls us up? More mouths to feed? We have a credit crunch that the Fed says requires lower interest rates; other economists tie the low interest rates to rising commodity prices. Isn\’t there a certain kind of madness going on here? Damned if you do; damned if you don\’t.It might just be the world is running out of gas….both literally and metaphorically speaking. The law of supply and demand is a nice equation to contemplate; but what if supplies are dwindling as demand is rising? Land for oil–what a pickle. Gas for the car or food for the stomach. Nice choice.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 12:36 am
i dont care whether the supply glut is true or notbut im buying more rice today (yah, my staple food)those who think that this is nothing,you are MORE than welcome to stay at home, please watch your dancing with stars/USSA idol programs..Brazil, Phillippine, Myanmar, Thailand(maybe, well will soon),Indonesia halting rice export!!!!!!!http://www.tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=41669
Stormy • April 24th, 2008 at 12:37 am
Sorry for the underline…it ran out from under…and into a bush somewhere. Tricky devil.
Stormy • April 24th, 2008 at 12:40 am
If a U is the shape of the coming depression….what pulls us out of it?(There, I put a leash on the underline.)
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 1:13 am
stormywhat pull us through the great depression??it has happen twice..need more hintspanzer, trench,
GSM • April 24th, 2008 at 1:19 am
I am an expat, working overseas for more than a couple decades. I can assure you, if wages and salaries for nationals in developing/emerging countries are any guide, that in 20 some years I have never witnessed such hikes in salaries paid in those countries than in the last 3-4 years. Relatively speaking, this is nothing less than a revolution in mankind’s wealth. Demand has and will continue to explode in the most populated places on this planet. YOY wage growth in China alone is between 15-20%. These same emerging economies/nations have CENTURIES of pent up demand. They have watched the wealthy OECD countries consume their way to a standard of living they view as from another planet. Now, finally, they are having a piece of that nirvana put on their table. Does any sane person think that someone who can afford a better diet for his/her family, a new car, a decent apartment, a better child’s education etc would now – after all those generations of striving for a” better” life- willingly forego it? Would any politician deny it?? Tie this in with the maladjustments and outright incompetence of most govt’s agricultural policies over the decades and we are witnessing epic change- and not for the better.It’s here. Peak (CHEAP) Oil and Peak (CHEAP) Food. Tinkering with who can and cannot invest in that story is playing at the edges. These are survival, as we know it, type issues. The die is cast and the battle joined for these resources. Best to be on your toes, or be sideswiped by the “law of unintended consequences”.
Mark • April 24th, 2008 at 2:47 am
Written by GSM on 2008-04-24 00:30:41Blaming the evil speculator is delusional.…The food price situation is a symptom. A symptom of the same misguided maladjusted world economy created and enabled by the greedy TPTB who think they can scam their way through life living off people like you and me Mark. If you’re looking to lay blame, that is where you should be headed. Rogers is a messenger- we all should at least listen.If you\’re looking for a fight on whether I believe that this system is totally out of whack, then you\’re going to find absolutely NO resistance.While you may think that the system can be adjusted (or in the case of stupid government meddling- unadjusted), I think that it\’s the system itself that fundamentally cannot survive, regardless of any \"proper\" changes by fact that it\’s capitalism, a driving force to extract and consume resources at the fastest rate possible.What favor/justice is Rogers, or any of here, doing for the rest of the planet, the majority of which is existing on $3/day or less?Sure, Rogers (and you) might be telling us why the machine is coughing, I\’m telling you that the machine itself is bad. By trying to fix the machine we\’re only perpetuating continued wide scale abuses (loading up on it like the mother of all bubbles; some might say apocalypse), of the plant and its inhabitants.When the blood of the world\’s economy, petro chemicals, quits flowing it\’s good night Irene. The Green Revolution, that well intentioned \"free market\" capitalists help install, will detonate, wiping out extensive populations. But I\’m sure that folks will continue to make money off all of this, thinking that they are influencing \"better\" outcomes for others, if not for themselves.Conservation of energy. Nature doesn\’t like it too well when this principle is violated. The system that we\’re operating is so out of balance in this regard and you and others just want to push it MORE out of balance?We\’re caught playing a bad game and don\’t know how to stop it. I\’d like to think that well-intentioned unrestricted markets can get us to where we need to go, but unfortunately that direction is highly unlikely to lead to future profits- hmm, sounds like exactly what\’s brewing now.Your later post I totally agree with.Mark
Alessandro • April 24th, 2008 at 3:51 am
One major point raised by Mish is a secular change in the attitude of the US consumer. 6 millions foreclosures will make approx 12 millions kids/teens well aware of what a monster debt really is. Add close friends and relatives, a few tens of millions of young Americans should come out immunized by the debt virus. If this goes through as bad as we suspect it\’ll makes for a significant secular change affecting the whole world.\"Cool to Be Frugal…Teen Awareness\"Kids are becoming really aware of what is happening to their economy and to their families.\"Every teen is going to have a friend or classmate whose parents lost their home. Walking Away Will Be The Next Mortgage Crisis. And as foreclosures skyrocket and parents lose their homes, these kids will remember it for the rest of their lives.Secular changes in behavior start with secular changes in attitudes. That secular change in attitudes is now underway and it\’s not just with teens either. Many baby boomers facing retirement are half scared to death.Greenspan had the wind of spendthrift consumers at his back. Bernanke has the wind of increasingly frugal consumers blowing briskly in his face. The implications should be obvious. Those who think Deflation In A Fiat Regime cannot happen, need to think again.\"http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/04/cool-to-be-frugal.htmlWritten by Alessandro
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 6:44 am
Alessandro,your post that deflation will be caused by housing is ridiculous. the deflation will only come after inflation peak and world demand on resource decline signficantly.the trick is when will inflation peak? will oil at $4, $5, $6, $7, or $8 do it? transport and utility still climbing the uptrend. so that mean, we don\’t see deflation happening until these two sectors break.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 6:58 am
would like to relate this conversation between 2 citibankers in a lift : banker 1 : how are you lately?…banker 2 : m alright (looking real gloomy), its really crazy out there.. banker 1 : yeah i know… everythings solved but the swap rates keep inching higher and higher.. banker 2: i cant believe it, the market is really irrational, just crazy.. mrskeptical
GSM • April 24th, 2008 at 7:13 am
What with the wealth and salary/wage growth we are seeing and will continue to see in the heavily populated emerging economies globally, I fail to see demand destruction from prices impacting commodities significantly enough anytime soon. If those same nations happen to be dollar peggers and they allow their currencies more floating freedom in order to appreciate vs the USD, this will have the effect of mitigating price shock as ($ priced) purchasing power grows. Thus, demand can be maintained even grow.Demand in the US will decline for many things as recession takes hold there. But I don\’t see how, given the global supply/demand dynamics of food and energy along with the US Fed\’s bent on trashing its currency, these 2 critical commodity groups are expected to decline significantly in price, if at all. That in turn will keep most inflationary measures (except those that seek to deceive!) elevated and above levels responsible CB’s want to see.Mish has been peddling the deflation mantra for ages. He was right on housing and debt yet completely downplays the inflation impact on life’s necessities. This is disingenuous. The rush of money to energy and food as investments is a safehaven play, pure and simple. And it will be around for quite a while now , regardless of Mish’s deflation collapse scenario. In this “new” world one will have to pay dearly for one’s food and energy consumption.
Alessandro • April 24th, 2008 at 7:35 am
@Guest on 2008-04-24 06:44:21I didn\’t use the word \’deflation\’, it is in the cited text from Mish. But I agree with him.Furthermore, Mich and I use the monetary definition of inflation/deflation, so the price of oil is meaningless. If you care you may look up a couple of good posts here:http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=inflation&sitesearch=http%3A%2F%2Fglobaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.comThe reason to adopt one of the monetary definitions is that there is no other way to come up with a single number. Price indexes have merits and I bet PPI and CPI will still be hot unless properly doctored, but variation in price indexes is only one of the effects of inflation/deflation.BTW: if you happen to have oil on sell at $8/brl I will gladly grab some.
Medic • April 24th, 2008 at 7:36 am
Good Morning all: GSM, You are on the money. The reality of the world\’s current situation is that human kind has stretched the boundaries of what the planet can support. The fight now is for survival – in fact, it has been that way for some time. The US has been engaged in monetary and governmental manipulation for decades for one reason and one reason only – survival. The kicker is, the US wants not only to survive, but to dominate so that it remains on top. We are a short-sighted people with much to offer the world – if we were not so paranoid and insecure. We are not a tolerant people and we, for the most part, are not well educated nor well informed on world events. But we will fight harder, dirtier and longer than anyone else to maintain our dominance – likely to our own peril. The commodities\’ rally the past several months quite simply represents the flight to safety from equities. This will slow down for a while, but when the markets take the next leg down, they will scream upwards again. Oil, food, metals – all are necessary for trade when fiat currencies become worthless. Make no mistakes folks, we move forward now by going back – to where we once were before we made such a mess of this place. Depression is inevitable, as are more wars and manipulation, as governments try to take advantage of a weakened US and the US in return tries to hold on to power. We shall all lose as ever smaller resources are wasted on even more ridiculous causes.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 8:56 am
Are we there yet? Are we at the crack up boom?.. mrskepticalWhat is a \"Crack-Up Boom?\" Von Mises explains :This first stage of the inflationary process may last for many years. While it lasts, the prices of many goods and services are not yet adjusted to the altered money relation. There are still people in the country who have not yet become aware of the fact that they are confronted with a price revolution which will finally result in a considerable rise of all prices, although the extent of this rise will not be the same in the various commodities and services. These people still believe that prices one day will drop. Waiting for this day, they restrict their purchases and concomitantly increase their cash holdings. As long as such ideas are still held by public opinion, it is not yet too late for the government to abandon its inflationary policy.But then, finally, the masses wake up. They become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly. A breakdown occurs. The crack-up boom appears. Everybody is anxious to swap his money against \’real\’ goods, no matter whether he needs them or not, no matter how much money he has to pay for them. Within a very short time, within a few weeks or even days, the things which were used as money are no longer used as media of exchange. They become scrap paper. Nobody wants to give away anything against them.It was this that happened with the Continental currency in America in 1781, with the French mandats territoriaux in 1796, and with the German mark in 1923. It will happen again whenever the same conditions appear. If a thing has to be used as a medium of exchange, public opinion must not believe that the quantity of this thing will increase beyond all bounds. Inflation is a policy that cannot last.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:04 am
10:01 Economic Report: New-home sales sink 8.5% to 17-year low in March
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:05 am
10:00 U.S. March new-home supply on market 11 months, 27-year high10:00 U.S. March new-home median price down 13.3% in past year
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:06 am
Durable-goods orders fall for third straight monthInventories rise 1.1% in March, signaling soft demand
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:10 am
April 24 (Bloomberg) — Orders for U.S. durable goods excluding transportation equipment rose more than forecast last month, indicating demand from overseas may be helping factories weather the housing-led economic slowdown. Bookings rose 1.5 percent for goods meant to last several years, outside of cars and planes, following a 2.1 percent decline for February, the Commerce Department said today in Washington. Total orders unexpectedly fell 0.3 percent, restrained by a decrease in defense-related hardware. Manufacturing has held up better than in past economic downturns as a drop in the dollar makes American products cheaper to foreign buyers. Gains in exports and lean inventories are keeping assembly lines moving, helping to offset slowing U.S. sales and softening the severity of a possible recession.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:15 am
Irrational markets return:http://bespokeinvest.typepad.com/bespoke/2008/04/us-sector-pe-ra.html
Anonymous • April 24th, 2008 at 9:21 am
The current commodities spike is akin to Dick Cheney telling California the rise in electricity and rolling blackouts was due to the failure to invest in electricity plants. It was nothing more than market manipulation as we now know. Enron deregulated electronic commodities exchanges. Mr. Rogers and his like (thanks to encouragement by our willingness to trash the dollar to save STUPID bankers who lent money with little or no underwriting) MILLIONS WILL STARVE TO DEATH.Where is the GAO looking at the rigged commodities markets? Yes, I will agree demand is up due to emerging markets – but something else is going on and it Stinks, Smells and has GRAVE consequences. The likes of Marc Rich (pardoned by Bill) don\’t give a !@#! about humanity.This is the world we now live in. It is corrupt and greed has no bounds.
MA • April 24th, 2008 at 9:25 am
@ Martin… Have you seen the repo rates in the past few days??? What’s going on? Something is up!Miss America
Octavio Richetta • April 24th, 2008 at 9:27 am
Excellent posting by GSM and others on the food commodities mess. Yes, I was a bit hard JR. Speculators cannot be the only ones singled out. Here in Argentina the farmers are bery bery bery angry. They will go on strike again at the end of the month now that soybean harvest season is over. The government closed beef exports and increased export tariffs on grain.It is a complex problem. But, IMO, The government has a point. For Argentina, cheap food is like for Venezuela cheap gas (about 0.15 USD/gallon, cheaper than water). If they leave international prices to grab a hold there would be higher inflation and poor people would starve.Given that the farmers get subsidies in for example, diesel, and that some of the farmed land belongs to the government while many millions of hectares were just grabbed for nothing through history; it would seem fair that the people of Argentina should share into the country\’s wealth.
Octavio Richetta • April 24th, 2008 at 9:34 am
Here I come again with my stupid daily market commentary. It looks like despite the usual avalanche of bad news,http://www.bloomberg.com/index.html?Intro=intro3The market is clinging onto this:First-time claims for unemployment insurance decreased to 342,000 in the week that ended April 19, from 375,000 a week earlier. The median forecast in a Bloomberg survey was for a reading of 375,000. A separate report showed durable goods orders except for transportation items increased 1.5 percent in March after a decline of 2.1 percent in February. One of this days, the market will fall like a rock. It won\’t be pretty!
Octavio Richetta • April 24th, 2008 at 9:38 am
Written by MA on 2008-04-24 09:25:31At the risk of looking stupid a few hours/days from now, watz your opinion on the market action we are witnessing?
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Octavio, it is going to get very interesting now with some US Peso stability/rally. The markets have been cheering the flaling Peso becuas it helps internation earnings support stock prices-it has also helped our economy from an export standpoint BUT…BUT…that means any Peso strength will no become a negative to the only 2 stories going for wall thief! How will they reconcile that!?
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Soory about all the typo\’s-had lots of coffee this a.m.!
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:42 am
\"will oil at $4, $5, $6, $7, or $8 do it\"i am talking gallon not barrel
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:42 am
\"UPS\’s first quarter results illustrate the dramatic slowing in the US economy,\" UPS Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer D. Scott Davis said on this morning\’s call. Rather than offering an optimistic assessment of the economy, Davis noted that many indicators are pointing to a contraction in the US economy and that they have become sharply more negative in the last two months.
Capone • April 24th, 2008 at 9:44 am
as an average non-economist shmuck, this \"Bookings rose 1.5 percent for goods meant to last several years, —>>outside of cars and planesIf someone were to have tracked a per ounce price of Cheese Flavored Doritos over the past 8 years, they would have been better served in gauging inflation than to follow the numbers provided by the US Financial Dictatorship. Off the cuff, I would place the odds of a depression as high as 25%, hyperinflation as high as 25% and something in the middle of the two at 50%. It is absolutely incredible up to this point the number of issues topics covered in this space which have become the eventual reality… @Miss America, may I request a link to a place where I can track repo rates ?
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:47 am
UPS Chief financial Officer Kurt Kuehn said business to consumer shipping growth remains much slower than it has been over the past couple of years. \"The consumer is definitely feeling it and both in our direct-to-retail business volume and our direct B2C is showing the impact.\"
Capone • April 24th, 2008 at 9:48 am
The White House has issued a Presidential proclamation today April 24, 2008, \"From this point forward the bad news will be excluded from the news. As a result of this proclamation, the news will be ALL GOOD from this day forward.\"
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 9:55 am
housing problem is symptom of cheap money policy. rising commodities price is also symptom. Rising inflation is shows slow and continue destruction of currency value. only peak in inflation is sign the value of currency will be restored.as for deflation, i don\’t see deflation. all i see is inflation via monetary policy of central banks around the world, especially FED. oil at $4, $5, $6, $7, or $8/gallon is nothing, it is going higher.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 10:20 am
Stocks going green. ALl is well
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 10:24 am
More proof wall fraud exists, we are not seeing ghosts!11:19[ADS] SEC: Trader sold ADS short while spreading Blackstone rumors11:19[ADS] SEC: Ex-Schottenfeld trader charged is Paul Berliner11:18[ADS] SEC says trader spread false rumors about Blackstone11:17[ADS] SEC charges ex-Schottenfeld trader with fraud, manipulation
K J Foehr • April 24th, 2008 at 10:30 am
New home sales plunge to lowest level in 16 1/2 yearsThursday April 24, 11:13 am ET By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer excerptNew home sales plunge to lowest level in 16 1/2 years, prices drop by largest amount in 38 years WASHINGTON (AP) — Sales of new homes plunged in March to the lowest level in 16 1/2 years as housing slumped further at the start of the spring sales season. The median price of a new home in March, compared with a year ago, fell by the largest amount in nearly four decades. …http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/080424/economy.html?.v=27Fed Weighs Pause After Next Rate Cut By Greg Ip excerptWASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve is likely to cut its short-term interest rate by a quarter of a percentage point next week — but then may be ready for a breather.The Fed, meeting Tuesday and Wednesday, is likely to make what would be its seventh cut in eight months. The reason: Some officials see a case for more insurance against a deeper recession.But others are concerned a cut could contribute to inflationary pressure with little benefit for growth. That means the option of standing pat will likely also be on the table. If it does cut rates, the …http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120899756185139975.html?mod=todays_us_nonsub_page_oneHow can the Fed even consider not lowering rates in this environment? Some are even advocating raising rates. That is what they did in the 1930s and it worsened the GD! The recession is / will be fighting inflation; the Fed doesn’t need to, IMO.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 10:38 am
K J, what do you mean \"in this environment\"?? Don\’t you know wall street says everything is ok and the President says we ARE NOT IN a recession!! C\’mon, buy a house, buy stocks, hell buy yourself a Rolex-enjoy life! Can\’t spend money when your dead!
MA • April 24th, 2008 at 10:47 am
@ ORI keep seeing conflicting signs!!! I am totally lost??? I need to start recreating my Excel model economy and playing with #’s to see where the excess and stress are landing. What I can say is that the physical pressure of credit subsided massively. …but there seems to be a new wave of psychological pressure building. That pressure is based on the hordes/masses that are finally catching up to what we’ve known about for the past 2 years. There’s also a new level of front office attention being spent on the existing problems. A couple of months ago cash conditions grew tight, but psyche was still loose. (traders aside) Now, with the aid of Gov’t flows, along with some positive cash flow signs (Rev/Inc/Pdwn still paying “in standard”) it seems that cash conditions are getting loose… but psyche is growing tight!I have friends in the MF arena, and I plan on checking in on what the Subs/Redm picture is looking like. (That’s your real “public opinion” on where things are at!) My gut tells me that volatility will pick up again. (even though my current models show us fairly flat for the day?!?!?!?!) See!!! I’m bery bery confused. I see volatility, and my models are coming up flat?!?!?! …to view beyond the short term, I still say we’ve got another full notch drop in the coming months.Ultimately… I’d air on the side of caution. Credit crunches, write downs, balace sheet losses, and protecting Wall St are one thing. …but starving people is another!!! (especially when there’s available food that should be affordable) Rescue efforts may be more intense based on that! Maybe that’s how the US Gov’t is looking to get back in the good graces of the world’s eyes??? (by solving the food crunch) Did I say it first? Yet another conspiracy theory? Oh, I gotta stop typing!@ CaponeI believe there are links… but the repo’s I see aren’t advertised. I can’t say anything more then that.Miss America
Capone • April 24th, 2008 at 10:50 am
sorry a copy and paste of earlier lost post went awry…as an average non-economist shmuck, this \"Bookings rose 1.5 percent for goods meant to last several years, —>>outside of cars and planesIf someone were to have tracked a per ounce price of Cheese Flavored Doritos over the past 8 years, they would have been better served in gauging inflation than to follow the numbers provided by the US Financial Dictatorship. Off the cuff, I would place the odds of a depression as high as 25%, hyperinflation as high as 25% and something in the middle of the two at 50%. It is absolutely incredible up to this point the number of issues topics covered in this space which have become the eventual reality… @Miss America, may I request a link to a place where I can track repo rates ? Written by Capone
Capone • April 24th, 2008 at 10:52 am
what the heck… last attempt and then forget it…as an average non-economist shmuck, this \"Bookings rose 1.5 percent for goods meant to last several years, outside of cars and planes, following a 2.1 percent decline for February,\" appears to me outrageous. So excluding cars and planes it is all good. What ? excluding food and energy, CPI is fine too. Ok, well can we then EXCLUDE Boeing\’s export of billions in planes, etc.(you know McDonnel Douglas produced military for WWIII hopefully to allies but doubtful etc.) from the TRADE DEFICIT for some consistency ? If someone were to have tracked a per ounce price of Cheese Flavored Doritos over the past 8 years, they would have been better served in gauging inflation than to follow the numbers provided by the US Financial Dictatorship. Off the cuff, I would place the odds of a depression as high as 25%, hyperinflation as high as 25% and something in the middle of the two at 50%. It is absolutely incredible up to this point the number of issues topics covered in this space which have become the eventual reality… @Miss America, may I request a link to a place where I can track repo rates ? Written by Capone
K J Foehr • April 24th, 2008 at 10:54 am
I don’t understand why the dollar and the markets are rising today.Can anyone tell me what would cause this market to go down? A reason to stay short?There doesn’t appear to be anything that makes it decline; it is beginning to look just like the incredibly ridiculous bull market of 2007.VIX is now comfortably below 20.I don’t think I can take this much longer; I am seriously thinking of capitulating on all my shorts.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 10:57 am
@KJ Foehr:Hold on to them !
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:00 am
Don\’t capitulate, eventually (eventually) the market may need to move down–normal, even light recessions discount by over 25%. But all illusions of FREE markets should be gone. Market has only discounted around 10%? Ridiculous. Futures manipulations. Artificial bolstering of financials which need to implode. Now China actively supporting their markets. Elections coming up, market fall would just give election to Demos. Must maintain illusion of free markets, free elections, freedom in general. The society\’s owners don\’t have a different American dream that the common man will buy.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:06 am
KJ-remember, the market can remain irrational much longer than you can remain solvent….
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:07 am
LOLOL the bank index $BKX is up 4.21% right now!!! LOLOLL
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Dow going up triple digits!
ES Trader • April 24th, 2008 at 11:12 am
it\’s the working group…for the second straight day they came in at 07:00 and bought SnP futures…this \’cushions\’ the sell off at 09:30 open…it also kicks in buy programs later in the day …sometimes….it\’s called manipulation.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:19 am
http://www.bloomberg.com/avp/avp.asxx?clip=mms://media2.bloomberg.com/cache/vv2t7zvsQcys.asfCredit Suisse Posts SF2.15 Billion Loss on WritedownsWorst homesales in 17 yearsPharmaceuticals report 4%+ losses…but Durables up!! Market UP! The sheeple will buy it!
Tadoichi • April 24th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Sure does rhyme…http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,741982,00.html Farmers still are facing the lowest prices since 1932. But bumper crops, however much they may reduce farm purchasing power, mean nice volume for railroads. Atta Boy, Berkshire Hathaway & Buffethttp://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,759973-1,00.htmlWise man say long memory and long patience make men, men otherwise silly jacksprys.
Hubbs • April 24th, 2008 at 11:37 am
From Hellasious blog Sudden Debt; A nice,concise and heavy hitting summation:Wednesday, April 23, 2008The Greenback: Toward A New Monetary PolicyAs we transit to a world of resource depletion and the reversal of the Permagrowth model, what is the proper monetary and currency regime? Clearly, not the existing fiat/credit currency, which depends entirely on financing present consumption by discounting future growth that may never occur. Just as bad would be a throwback to precious metals. It would suppress economic activity without providing incentives for developing alternative energy resources.Energy will be the real gold standardPoliticians have been been feeding us this crap about future growth delivering us from our lack of discipline and vision today.Just not sure how energy credits would be feasible.Written by Hubbs
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:38 am
Many an axe hath fell\’d, a statelier tree, But the quick stroke was quell\’d, When it touched thee.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:39 am
The centralization of protectionist power (protecting the few who whill have the power) in the US is well underway and near completion. If the Fed is allowed to become \"the supervisor\" of the US financial system and banking is opened up to commercial ownership of financial entities, the task will be done. This is one of the most dangerous political environments ever for the US…the sheeple have been herded, now let the slaughter begin…
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:45 am
The pres probably ordered hank and ben to make sure dealer desk had plenty of cash to make stocks appear as though they agree with his message-mainly, a recession is hog-wash. Stocks are less than 10% off their highs.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:47 am
More contribed conspiracy…ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said Thursday that he\’s concerned about recent sharp fluctuations in exchange rates. \"We\’re concerned about the possible implications for financial and macroeconomic stability,\" Trichet told reporters, according to Dow Jones Newswires. He added that it\’s \"very important\" that U.S. authorities have said a strong dollar is in the country\’s own interest. Trichet also reportedly said that the ECB\’s current monetary policy stance would contribute to achieving the ECB objective of price stability, and that it would help \"anchor inflation expectations.\" ECB executive board member Juergen Stark echoed Trichet, telling reporters that the central bank\’s current monetary policy stance will \"contribute to achieve our medium-term objective\" of price stability, according to news reports. The remarks came after the euro hit a record high against the dollar Tuesday of $1.6020. \"Is it a coincidence that the change in tone came after the euro breached $1.60, and that so many ECB members are taking a less hawkish tone? We think not,\" wrote Win Thin, senior currency strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 11:51 am
Brown Brothers Harriman, GW 41 & 43. Like sand in my mouth, need a long rinse.
Anonymous • April 24th, 2008 at 11:58 am
@KJCapitulate some, hold on to the rest.
sam • April 24th, 2008 at 12:03 pm
free ricehttp://www.thestreet.com/s/free-rice-dont-panic/video/strategysession/10413520.html?puc=_txtmdb#10413520
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Why are markets rallying in face of such bad news?First, it isn\’t really people controlling the markets now. It\’s leveraged institutional trading money. It can move out as fast as it moves in, especially if leverage dries up.It\’s very sophisticated money that can go short as quickly as it can go long. And there will come a time when a lot of that money turns very bearish and short. It\’s the ultimate profit-making end game.These are global markets. Europe is fundamentally a lot stronger market than the U.S. But European stocks have been getting pounded compared to the U.S. mainly because their markets aren\’t as leveraged or manipulated. That will correct as arbitraguers assess values and opportunities.Deep into a recession, the market begins to discount hyped-up forward earnings and P/Es based on them. There is nothing out there capable of driving earnings higher over the next 4-6 quarters at least. The smaller, more domestic and more leveraged a company is, the more vulnerable its earnings will be and the more multiple contraction will happen.Finally, before this debacle has run its course, J6P will be yelling and screaming to his Congressman to fix this mess with some real regulation of financial markets.There have been two eras of financial market regulation since the early 1930s. In one era, the government protected the rights of regular investors by limiting leveraged trading and self-dealing. In the second, since the late 90s, the govt. has used leverage and self-dealing to prop up the markets and keep them from crashing. The govt. has become leverage junkie #1. The second era will end soon enoughRich AT CR
HousingDepression • April 24th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
Excellent read for all shorts here.http://www.minyanville.com/articles/index.php?a=16882
Tadoichi • April 24th, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Nihon ochita keizai — Doshitehttp://www.mises.org/article.aspx?Id=1099
Capone • April 24th, 2008 at 12:17 pm
\"We believe it means we are simply in a counter-trend rally driven by a reversion of excessive negative sentiment. Put more simply, people are relieved the entire economic system did not collapse…\"from the Minyanville article – read it slowly over and over and try to put yourself back in time 2 years ago and understand how outrageous the current period in financial history has become. we are becoming immune to hearing about billion dollar losses and the term systemic is thrown around like any other word… the further we rally in front of this rate cut next week the better from where i am sitting… i hope we blow off up further, trigger all the technical bullish bells and whistles possible before the meeting…
Gloomy • April 24th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
This bear growls onPosted by Ambrose Evans-PritchardNo bear wants to be a perma-pessimist, ever waiting for the sky to fall. Economic gloom: will blue skies return to the Bank of England?So, sunk in a deep armchair with an optimistic bottle of Rioja (Baron De Ley Reserva), I have tried to tot up reasons why the great credit smash-up of 2007-2008 may now be safely over, heralding sunlit uplands once again. 1) Ben Bernanke has carried out the most dramatic rescue since the creation of the US Federal Reserve. His emergency rate cuts – 125 basis points over eight days in January – was a \"game changer\", as they say in London’s American Quarter, Canary Wharf.By cutting rates from 5.25pc to 2.25pc since September, the Fed has averted \’re-set Armaggedon\’ on the Greenspan mortgages – those floating rate \’teasers\’ taken out in 2005 to 2007. Payments will barely jump at all for most subprimers. Big difference.The cuts are heavenly manna for the banks. These miscreants can now play the \"steepening yield curve\", using their monopoly privileges to borrow cheaply from the US Government and lend back expensively to the same US Government on long-dated bonds. This is the time-honoured method for rebuilding balance sheets. It works wonders. Even better (from the banks point of view), few people are aware of this massive bail-out.2) Bernanke has accepted \’bus tickets\’ as collateral. The broker dealers (Bear Stearns, et al) can take their waste to the Fed’s Discount window, putting a floor under the entire shadow banking and $516 trillion derivatives nexus. Meanwhile, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been armed with nuclear weapons to win the credit war. De facto, if not de jure, the mortgage industry has been nationalized. Big difference.3) The Bank of England has woken up. Better late than never. As Professor Charles Goodhart (LSE and ex rate-setter) put it: \"When you’re in a crisis, you deal with the crisis. Moral hazard comes when times are easier.\" Quite. 4) A dodgy one, this: China grew at 10.6pc in the first quarter. The BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China – are holding up. (If you ignore their galloping inflation, which you can’t, of course: current inflation merely means a future squeeze.) Actually, scrap point 4. It’s rubbish.Still 1, 2,and 3, matter a great deal. Yet, I cannot really believe the tale of salvation. The Greenspan credit bubble and Europe’s EMU bubble (Club Med, Ireland, and ERM-fixers in Denmark and Eastern Europe) have together infused so much poison into the Atlantic economy that it will require a brutal purge – like chelating heavy metals from the brain. America, of course, is already in recession – although the cascade of defaults, business closures, and job losses has barely begun.Japan is in recession too, according to Goldman Sachs. It is still the world’s second biggest economy by far, lest we forget. Britain, Ireland, Spain, Italy, and New Zealand, are tipping into housing slumps and demand implosions of varying severity.Ontario and Quebec have stalled. Canada’s growth is the weakest in fifteen years, hence the half point cut by the Bank of Canada yesterday.Australia is on borrowed time, whatever the price of coal and iron ore. Household debt is 175pc of disposable income, up in La La Land with England, Ireland, Denmark, and the Dutch. The wholesale funding market for mortgages that underpins this nonsense remains frozen.Together these countries and regions make up roughly 45pc of the global economy, and over half global demand. My hunch is that this bloc will be sliding towards full-blown deflation within a year as the commodity bubble pops and job losses set off a self-feeding downward spiral.The alleged parallel with the oil spike of the early 1970s is a snare. Debt leverage has been more reckless this time. It must contract more viciously. Inflation is less sticky (going down) in the Anglo-Saxon world, if not flexless Europe, where stagflation awaits. If you think that core Europe – Greater Germany, Benelux, and the Scandies (France is faltering) – can somehow tough it out as the rest of the OECD’s industrial family hurtles into a brick wall, read the IMF’s “Regional Economic Outlook: Europe”, published this week.The Fund has cut its eurozone growth forecast to 1.4pc this year, and 1.2pc next – with perma-slump pencilled in for Italy. This puts it at daggers drawn with the European Central Bank, the fervent apostle of decoupling.Europe will suffer 40pc of the entire $940bn global losses stemming from the credit crunch. Euro banks alone will lose $123bn (compared to $144bn for the US). \"Loss recognition will need to catch up,\" said the IMF.\"Liquidity remains seriously impaired. Lenders are tightening credit standards, particularly for loans to enterprises,\" it said.\"The deteriorating economic outlook could weaken European and corporate balance sheets appreciably,\" it said.On it goes, more or less dire, if you adjust for the IMF’s softly-softly style.The report contains a grim chapter on what may happen along the vast arch of over-heating silliness from the Baltics to the Black Sea, funded by Austrian, Swedish, German, Belgian, and Italian banks. \"Europe’s emerging economies are susceptible to financial shocks, which could make the situation dramatically worse,\" said Michael Deppler, the Fund’s Europe chief.Last year, private credit grew 62pc in Bulgaria, 60.4pc in Romania, 55.2pc in Kazakhstan, 45pc across the Baltics. Need one say more?Current account deficits have reached 22.9pc in Latvia, 21.4pc in Bulgaria, 16.5pc in Serbia, 16pc in Estonia, 14.5pc in Romania and 13.3pc in Lithuania. The gap has been plugged by foreign loans. These are no longer forth-coming. Spreads have ballooned by over 500 basis points.\"Banking systems that are heavily dependent on foreign borrowing to support credit growth could face a sudden shortfall,\" said the IMF. Woe betide the creditors. Loans to the old Soviet bloc account for 23pc of the entire asset base of the Austrian banking system, and 10pc of the Swedish and Belgian systems.As Europe’s drama slowly unfolds, the ECB is sticking defiantly to its orthodox line. The IMF suggests looking beyond the current food and oil spike (inflation is at a post-EMU high of 3.6pc), and preparing \"some easing of the policy stance\".Axel Weber, the German Bundesbank chief and leader of the Uber-hawks, will have none of it. \"I do not share the vision of the IMF,\" he said, tartly. One notes that the Bundesbank was quieter when Germany was in the dumps and needed lower interest rates. It acquiesced in roaring money supply growth as inflation fuelled bubbles in the Latin Bloc – the cause of their current distress. Such is the hypocrisy of EMU. Beware the pious incantations by Mr Weber, a German nationalist in Euro-clothing. (I will return to the theme of Mr Weber in another blog.) The ECB’s \"error\" will become clear over the next year as the house price crash across Club Med and Ireland combines in a lethal brew with the East Bloc credit deflation. Germany will not be immune from the blow-back. It has funded a good chunk of Club Med’s foreign debts: Spain ($362bn), Italy ($275bn), Greece ($129bn), Greece ($98bn), and – honorary Club Med – Ireland ($123bn).Far from being the shock absorber, Europe may prove to be the accelerator of this post-bubble denouement.Once you add Europe to the Anglo-Saxon and Japanese sick list, you reach 60pc of world GDP, and two thirds world demand.This leaves the global boom on tenuously narrow ground. Who is going to buy all those exports from China? Who is going to keep pushing commodity prices into the stratosphere? This bear growls on.Good Rioja,
nevertheless.http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/business/ambrosevanspritchard/april2008/thisbeargrowlson.htm
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
10 and 30 yields heading up.
Anonymous • April 24th, 2008 at 12:35 pm
@Gloomyare you still holding on to your short positions or have you capitulated?
WalterDS • April 24th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
@KJ: Do NOT capitulate. Listen to the professor.
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
1:53 Motorola posts wider loss1:52 BMW to take $372 mln Q1 charge on slow U.S. sales: reportsOh, by the way, there is now 6 inverted yield curves in industrialized, mature economies with two other be flat…so much for exports saving the US
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 12:59 pm
Stocks breaking out to new highs! Sow 13K here we come!
Alessandro • April 24th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
@Guest on 2008-04-24 12:58:25Interesting, where do you look them up?
Guest • April 24th, 2008 at 1:17 pm
@GloomyYou certainly live up to your moniker. I\’m looking around for a sucker-sweet shaped like a pistol. It would feel better reading your posts with a gun in my mouth.
sam • April 24th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Buyout Firms Increasing Hiring in Emerging Marketssign of the timeshttp://www.cnbc.com/id/24293892
K J Foehr • April 24th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
How can the market strengthen even as the economic news worsens? This is no place for a logically minded person.I hate to quit now as a big loser when just six short weeks ago I could have quit as a big winner. But I can’t take the irrationality.I give up.Good luck all.
Anonymous • April 24th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
@KJThink again..when you capitualte, you let someone else walk away with your money!This is an IRRATIONAL market and it has to come down from these ludicrous levels.I will hold on to my shorts because until Dow tanks to 10K levels..
sam • April 24th, 2008 at 2:20 pm
This person knows what he is talking about. He just atarted a blog.http://trading2bfree.blogspot.com/
K J Foehr • April 24th, 2008 at 2:25 pm
I couldn\’t pull the trigger.new thread
J. • April 24th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
GSM,Commodities can fall even without demand destruction. If, for example, the CFTC did the unimaginable and closed the loophole which has allowed index funds to evade position limits and flood into relatively small markets, well, prices would adjust very quickly. IOW, there\’s been a multi-year financial element to the ramp — it is not strictly S/D fundamentals














