EconoMonitor

Efraim Chalamish's Economic Development and Security Blog

Where Is the Burning Man Heading?

As the Middle East and the world mark a year to the Arab Spring, reflections are divided. Some argue that the Arab Spring and its achievements belong with the pantheon of global revolutionary movements, such as the collapse of the Soviet Union and the reunification of Germany. Others, on the other hand, argue that it was more of an outlier and that something in the Arab DNA makes an Arab popular uprising an exceptional case.

There is evidence supporting both positions. Last year’s events indeed empowered the Arab citizen and provided her with new universal human rights. At the same time, new governments try to implement new democratic practices within a long tradition of religious, centralized regimes.

Both perspectives cannot ignore the economic climate that had triggered the Arab Spring movement in its current form and timing, and the prospects for economic success and growth in the post-uprisings Middle East.

Reflecting on the last two decades, it seems that since the global recession of the 80s and the decline in oil prices, it was external parties and powers that managed to deal with economic failures in the Arab society and structural problems such as structured and hidden unemployment. The First Gulf War, writing off Egyptian debts to Europe and the U.S., Syria’s control of Lebanon and its economy, the Oil-for-Food program and the increase in Iraq’s trade with its partners Egypt, Syria and Lebanon, and American guarantees to the region as part of its Second Iraq War efforts –all supported Middle East economies in times of crisis.

Yet, this ad-hoc strategy has started to fail in recent years. Higher energy and food prices, low employment and wages, and the closure of Europe and the Gulf to skilled workers from the Middle East gave the youth no choice. The streets are burning.

Although it is too early to judge the long-term economic consequences of last year’s riots, the immediate results are not favorable. Inward investment fell sharply. Egypt, which was a major recipient of FDI among emerging markets (US$ 9.4 Billion in 2008) during the second half of the past decade, has suffered dramatically as a result of the global financial crisis and last year’s revolution. Tourism, one of the region’s leading industries, continues to decline. In Tunisia, an Arab Spring’s pioneer, for example, tourism fell 50% since last year. The rise of Islamism in many of these countries questions the future of open tourism in the region. The political uncertainty and the practical results of many of the recent elections do not create the necessary stability, which many of global investors and travelers are looking for. Finally, and most importantly, energy and food prices continue to rise, which encourages the Street to continue to strike. This is a vicious cycle.

The new regimes in the Middle East, driven by old and new strong Islamist political parties, face an unprecedented challenge. They need to bring years of economic regression to an end. Political stability will be crucial in order to execute the necessary reforms in order to reduce inflation, increase work force participation, reduce governments’ spending, and revive the private sector in the region.

Egypt, for example, still confronts a tension between the new political elite and the military. Any attempt of the Muslim Brotherhood that won 47% of the parliamentary seats to impose new rules on the powerful Egyptian military can trigger a political coup. At the same time, any attempt of the military to get involved in political decisions would encourage the government to constitutionally limit the military’s authority and powers. The importance of this fine balance is not only for political purposes, but also for the ability of the current regime to focus on its economic targets and gain the political backing to implement bold structural and economic reforms.

The story of the Arab Spring is still unfolding. Syria is still burning, and from time to time local events question the ability of several Gulf States to find the right balance between the various minorities among them. Those who try to predict the centers of political or economic instability of 2012 globally should not dismiss the region. The real story is ahead of us.

One Response to “Where Is the Burning Man Heading?”

rodeneugenFebruary 3rd, 2012 at 10:11 am

To my opinion the Arab countries are about to divide economically into several categories.

1.The oil reach countries like the Saudis and its satellites, will probably turn their wealth into creating a modern state. Their perspective of enjoying high income out of oil for the next 40 years, will give them enough time to make a change towards modernity. The only question is how they will be influenced by their "gast arbaiters"? (One third of the population in Saudia are foreign workers, mainly from other Muslim countries).
2. Iraq will probably become a pro Iranian country. In the best case it will have the position of inter mediator between Iran and the rest of the world, (mainly USA).
3. Syria, Jordan+Palestine and Egypt, due to their large population, no oil wealth and no capacity to secure descent standard of living on the short term have very limited options. The new Islamic leadership, that will emerge out of the revolution, has no tools to solve the economic misery of the population. Hard to predict to where these countries are heading to, but even harder is to believe that western style economic and political system will emerge out of this situation. Most probably they will end with some kind of dictatorship, with either military or Islamic government. The high rate of population growth in these countries, creates huge proportion of unsatisfied young population, which my turn to any ideological direction. They were already once disappointed by the military leadership of Nasser-ism, to my opinion Islam will not be more successful. Modern economy, that can secure decent standard of living for wide level of society is based on liberal values and education, the alternative to this is economic misery and political dissatisfaction. The only question is, to what direction will this boiling pot blow up.

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Thomas Grennes Thoughts From Across the Atlantic

Thomas Grennes is a professor of economics at the North Carolina State University and a former visiting faculty member at the Stockholm School of Economics in Riga. His research has dealt with various aspects of international economics, including open economy macroeconomics, international finance, and international trade in agricultural products. Recent research topics have included macroeconomic aspects of the Great Moderation, offshore outsourcing, sovereign wealth funds, and the relationship between government debt and economic growth. Earlier work dealt with emerging market issues in the Baltic countries and Russia and trade and macro policies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Economic history topics include the Columbian Exchange of plants and animals, the effects on food markets of introducing mechanical refrigeration, and the integration of Tsarist Russia into the world grain market. When he is not involved in economics, he enjoys mountain hiking.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.