2012 – The Year We All Learn to Live Dangerously
Well, the latest batch of EU interim growth forecasts are out, and there are few surprises after so much prior comment. The Euro Area as a whole is expected to contract, but of course within the aggregate contraction some will fare rather better than others. “The EU is set to experience stagnating GDP this year, and the euro area will undergo a mild recession”, according to the press release. What this means in practice is that Greece is expected to contract by 4.3%, while the German economy is forecast to grow by 0.6%. For yet another year Eurozone economies are expected to diverge far more than they will converge. Downward revisions of one percentage point or more were made to the forecasts for Estonia, Spain, Greece, Italy, and the Netherlands, while those for Germany, France, Austria, Slovakia, Denmark, Poland and the UK were either left unchanged or reduced by less than a quarter percentage point. No one was revised upwards.
Aside from Greece, the number which has probably raised most eyebrows is the downward revision of the Estonian outlook, by two full percentage points, from 3.2% to 1.2%. In fact the Estonian economy started to contract in the last three months of last year, but now the EU have also let the big secret is out of the bag – Estonia’s “miracle growth” wasn’t only being driven by strong fiscal austerity, it was also being strongly boosted by the activities of just one company, Swedish mobile phone giant Ericsson, who made the decision to locate an assembly plant there. According to reports in the local press the company increased its output sixfold between 2010 and 2011.
Now things aren’t going so well for the Swedish company, and they are cutting back their Estonian activity accordingly, sending Estonian industrial output down sharply again (see chart above). As the EU interim forecast for the country notes of the negative growth in Q4:
“The contraction, however, was mostly limited to the export-oriented electronics sector, which had been one of the main growth drivers in the initial phase of the recovery. More recently, manufacturing production seems to have stabilised at somewhat below its recent peak level”.
This point has long been obvious to those following the Baltic economies closely, but with such an intense debate going on about whether or not the various countries should have devalued, and with so many people claiming Estonia as a shining example of austerity, drawing attention to such a “mere technical detail” might have seemed like sour grapes, and an attempt to spoil the party. In any event, the Baltics are now drifting back towards recession – mild or otherwise – but that will be another story for another day.
Whatever the shocks are which are causing this downturn (assuming you like models of cycles and shocks) they are not hitting all countries anywhere near equally, which is just another way of saying that the Euro Area as a whole is vulnerable to the impact of asymmetric shocks, which naturally makes the handling of monetary policy much more difficult than it otherwise would be. Naturally it is obvious that sovereign debt pressures vary widely, as does the impact of the credit crunch (try this one – German companies enjoy access to credit – from the FT last week, if you were in any doubt), and the level of unemployment is hardly uniform.
On the other hand, we could consider another possibility, and that is simply that following the Global Financial Crisis (as I argued in this post back in 2010) upturns may be weaker and shorter than in the pre-crisis years, while downturns may be more marked and more frequent. Put another way, the growth path of the Euro Area economy over the next decade may look more like that of Italy or Portugal during the first ten years of this century than it will look like that of Spain or Ireland during the “good years”. Japan is always out there glancing towards us, just as a reminder of what having two lost decades actually looks like.
In addition Europe has ageing population problems, and a large economic re-orientation to carry out from looking towards growth in internal demand to looking towards sales in Emerging Markets, so it would be unrealistic to be thinking in terms of stellar growth anyway. More structural reforms will certainly help, but they are hardly going to be a game changer.
Moving beyond these issues, and thinking about how in fact the short term outlook in the Euro Area is better than it looked like it was going to be last November, we might want to ask ourselves whether the second half of 2012 might not surprise a little on the downside, while 2013 may remain much more of a flatliner than people are expecting. Barring “accidents” we are unlikely to see a crash, but rather a steady process of fiscal consolidation and debt deleveraging, which will surely mean growth will remain weak and constantly tending towards zero.
Short Term Stabilisation and Stagnation
This kind of view is basically confirmed as far as I can see by the latest set of flash PMI results, which confirm the general impression that the key countries in the global economy are moving from stabilisation (not sinking further into recession) towards stagnation (slight growth but without signs of a significant recovery in activity in the vein of the “good old days”).
So basically the German economy is still running on some sort of borrowed time, as orders accumulated over the really good months are steadily worked down. Nonetheless, as today’s much watched IFO survey suggests, the German business community remains optimistic, and even the expectations component continues to sneak upwards.
Thus the road ahead looks clear, if somewhat flat. The Euro Area’s two largest economies look set to escape “the worst of the worst”, but remain dependent on factors outside their control, in the US, in China, and in the emerging market world as a whole, all of whom could in their turn be badly affected by the impact on risk sentiment of any unfortunate “accident” in the Eurozone itself. Most of these issues are unlikely to go away any time in the foreseeable future, which is why I think 2012 will be marked as the year we learned to live with the world we have, and stop dreaming about another one, which has long since ceased to exist. Will 2013 be better than 2012? The honest answer, despite the pile of analyst reports, is “who knows”, which is why, whether we like danger or not, we are condemned to have to grow accustomed to it.
Comments are closed.