Are You Better Off Than You Were at the End of the Bush Administration? A Data-Based Assessment

I’ve heard a lot about the “four years ago” comparison. Four years ago, we were on the cusp of Don Luskin’s famous prediction (“… we’re on the brink not of recession, but of accelerating prosperity.”), and Phill Gramm had two months earlier decried the ongoing “mental recession”. [0] It seems to me the more appropriate marker is the last election, in 2008Q4. We can then assess what the data tells us about 2012Q2 vis a vis 2008Q4.

Aggregate Measures of Activity and Income

First, I look to several measures in addition to the standard real GDP indicator. Note that I divide by population, in order to express the variables in per capita terms (thereby controlling for population growth). In the graph below, when the series lie above the horizontal line at zero, then the indicator exceeds its level at 2008Q4. The numerical value can be interpreted as the percentage deviation from 2008Q4 levels, in log terms.

Figure 1: Log real per capita GDP (blue), GNP (red), Net National Product (green), Gross Domestic Income (purple), all SAAR in Ch.2005\$, normalized to 2008Q4=0. Source: BEA, 2012Q2 second release.In other words, aggregate output and income measures on a per capita basis exceed levels recorded at the end of the G.W. Bush Administration. (Given population growth, obviously absolute levels exceed by an even greater extent). If one looks to production by American-owned factors of production (as opposed to factors of production located within the geographical confines of the Nation), then output growth is even more pronounced.

If one refers the first derivative, then the case for improvement is reinforced. Per capita GDP was declining 10.3% (SAAR, log terms) in 2008Q4, and rose 1.0% in 2012Q2.

Consumption and Household Net Worth

Consumption is the object typically thought of as the measure entering into the utility function. We do not observe consumption, but we do observe consumption expenditures. Per capita consumption expenditures is above levels of 2008Q4. Consistent with that finding, net household worth is also above corresponding levels.

Figure 2: Log real per capita consumption (blue), SAAR in Ch.2005\$, and net household worth (red), normalized to 2008Q4=0. Source: BEA, 2012Q2 second release, and Fed Flow of Funds.Clearly, both measures exceed those recorded at the end of the Bush Administration; per capita consumption was 2.8% higher, while as of 2012Q1, net worth was 7.6% higher. I find both results remarkable, given the fact that these indicators are often depressed after large financial balance-sheet induced recessions.[1]

The gradient is also relevant; per capita consumption declined 6.2% in 2008Q4, and rose 1.0% in 2012Q2 (SAAR, log terms).

The Private Sector

What about real compensation and productivity? BLS data indicate that both have risen.

Figure 3: Log real compensation (blue) and output per hour (red) in the nonfarm business sector, normalized to 2008Q4=0. Source: BLS via FRED, and author’s calculations.The fact that real compensation is essentially at 2008Q4 levels is not encouraging. Nor is the fact that output per hour is far above compensation, as it indicates that a higher share of income is going to capital in the nonfarm business sector (this is confirmed by BLS data on the income share; it’s been decreasing since 2000 pretty much without stop). In this sense, the owners of capital have been doing particularly well. As an aside, on this Labor Day, it seems to me that measures that would allow labor to garner a larger share of national income are in order. Had the greater demand support measures been implemented, higher demand for labor would have induced greater upward pressure on wages. Unfortunately, additional measures to support aggregate demand have been stifled in the Congress.

Counterfactuals

As economists (actually, as sensible people), we should be interested in the difference relative to the counterfactual. The counterfactual (as well as conditioning) is a difficult concept for many people to understand, but I’ll forge ahead, using the CBO assessment of high-low range of impacts to determine the counterfactual level of GDP in the absence of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). In my view, this range encompasses the range of multipliers associated with reasonable models of New Keynesian and Keynesian/neoclassical synthesis flavors.

< B>Figure 4: Real GDP (thick black), WSJ mean forecast from August survey (thick blue), counterfactual GDP w/o American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, low impact (green), and high impact (red). NBER defined recession dates shaded gray. Vertical line at 2008Q4. Source: BEA, 2012Q2 second release, WSJCBO (Aug. 23) Table 1, NBER, and author’s calculations.While by either measure, the positive impact of the ARRA has diminished, it should be remembered that in 2010, output was substantially higher (and unemployment lower, between 0.4 to 1.8 percentage points) than it otherwise would have been. Just because it’s in the past, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t matter. Furthermore, the midpoint of the CBO range would place economic output in 2012Q3 0.4 percent above what it would have been in the absence of the ARRA. (For discussion of why one might expect multipliers to be at the higher end, see here).

(As an aside, note that even when one uses the pessimistic measures of multipliers, output would have continued to decline after 2009Q2 in the absence of the ARRA. I do wonder how sensible people can continue to say “the stimulus didn’t work”. Once again, to me, this is the triumph of ideology over empirics.)

WWRHD?

Or, what would Romney have done?

Finally, I think it useful to consider a regime that was completely laissez faire with respect to interventions should the economy encounter new challenges. We have one observation on Governor Romney’s policy perspective — namely what should have been done with Detroit in 2009. He recommended letting the companies go bankrupt. [2] While auto manufacturing does not represent all of the US economy, it remains important (e.g., ) and so this policy prescription should be taken as an important indicator of his approach.

Figure 5 depicts how motor vehicle production and new vehicle consumption has evolved since Governor Romney’s admonition to let Detroit go bankrupt.

Figure 5: US motor vehicle output (blue) and consumption of new vehicles (red), in bn. Ch.05\$. Dashed line at 2008Q4 (November 2008). NBER defined recession dates shaded gray. Vertical dashed line at 2008Q4 (Romney’s NYT OpEd). Source: BEA, Table 7.2.6U. Real Motor Vehicle Output, August 29, 2012 release, and author’s calculations.In other words, the real value of production of motor vehicles is now 40% above those recorded in 2008Q4 (in log terms). Once again, one can think of the counterfactual. After an uncontrolled bankruptcy, in which no financing was available due to the contemporaneous financial crisis, would the auto industry have risen like a phoenix, outshining what we have witnessed thus far? It’s possible. After all, I ran a 45 second 440 in high school. Plus or minus 25 seconds… [3]

This post was originally published at Econbrowser and is reproduced here with permission.

One Response to "Are You Better Off Than You Were at the End of the Bush Administration? A Data-Based Assessment"

1. Peter Schaeffer   September 11, 2012 at 1:34 pm

This is more DNC (Democratic National Committee) press release material. If the Republicans dared to use these statistics, Chinn would flay them without mercy (rightfully so).

A few germane "facts"

1. The employment / population ratio has fallen from 61.4% in 2008Q4 to 58.6% in 2012Q2. See series LNS12300000 over at bls.gov.

2. Labor force participation has fallen from 65.8% in 2008Q4 to 63.8% in 2012Q2. See series LNS11300000 over at bls.gov.

3. Discouraged workers have risen from 608K in 2008Q4 to 830K in 2012Q2 (down from a peak of 1318K). See series LNU05026645 over at bls.gov.

4. The total unemployment rate (U6) has risen from 12.7% in 2008Q4 to 14.8% in 2012Q2. See series LNS13327709 over at bls.gov.

5. Average hourly earnings for production workers are down from \$8.82 (in 1982-84 dollars) in 2008Q4 to \$8.75 in 2012Q2. See series CES0500000032 over at bls.gov.

6. Median household income has plunged in recent years. From http://www.sentierresearch.com/pressreleases/Sent…. Quote

"During the recession, real median annual household income fell by 3.2 percent, from \$55,309 in December 2007 to \$53,518 in June 2009. During the economic recovery, real median annual household income fell by an additional 6.7 percent, from \$53,518 in June 2009 to \$49,909 in June 2011."

It turns out the if you use the above methodology Bush was actually a great success (bet you didn't know that). From 2000Q4 to 20008Q2 real per-capita GDP rose by 9.56%, real per-capita GNP rose 10.32%, real per-capita disposable personal income rose 16.52%, real per-capita PCE rose 12.26%.

Even if you go from 2000Q4 to 2008Q4 the numbers are all strongly positive with real disposable per-capita income up 13.25%.

See BEA NIPA table 7.1 for the details.

Bush was a wonderful president… Obviously. Just like Obama.