Summary: Most people focus on the month-to-month changes in the jobs report, which consists mostly of noise. The year-to-date and 12-month changes are more revealing. We remain in a slow recovery, somewhat faster than in 2010. But it might be slowing! We should enjoy it, as it was bought at great cost. A cost we cannot long continue to pay.
- Household survey
- Establishment survey
- Other important metrics
- For more information about US government finances
Here we examine the April employment report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They conduct two surveys: one of households, one of businesses. They are not directly comparable, each giving different perspectives on the US economy. Today we look at the changes year-to-date and especially year-over-year changes (the latter avoids seasonal adjustments distorted by the warm winter). The picture painted is consistent with the many other streams of information about the economy — effective rebuttal to both those seeing a good recovery as well as the cultists insisting all the government data is faked to re-elect Obama or benefit the Trilateral Commission.
The important detail to know about the recovery: during this period the government’s public debt increased aproximately $1.3 trillion — aprox 8.4% of GDP (see debt here and GDP here), one of the higher fiscal deficits in the world. Our shiny recovery results from massive borrowing and spending, without which we’d be in a deep recession, like Italy or even Spain.
In other words, organic growth has not yet resumed. The US economy has stabilized and slowly improves due to the massive “drugs” of monetary and fiscal stimulus. Both have severe side-effects, which at some unknown point in the future will become problematic or untenable. But the worst side effect was unexpected: the stimulus has eliminated the pressure for reform. We have had the New Deal stimulus without the New Deal reforms (some of which failed, but some setup the great post-war boom).
(2) The Household survey
The Current Population survey is a simple survey of households, with large error bars but no revisions and few adjustments. It shows no improvement since January, and slow growth during the past year.
Since January the seasonally-adjusted household survey shows 238 thousand new jobs. Since February it shows 200 thousand jobs lost. That’s bad, because some research suggests that the household report shows inflection reports before the business (establishment) survey.
During the past year, the number employed growing at the roughly same rate as the civilian non-institutionalized population. But the number not in the labor force grew even faster. These are non-seasonally adjusted numbers.
|Description||April 2011||April 2012||Change||Change|
|Civilian non-instit population||239,146||242,604||3,638||1.5%|
|Civilian labor force||152,898||154,916||1,007||0.7%|
|…Participation rate in the labor force||0.640||0.696||-0.050||-0.8%|
|Not in the labor force||86,248||88,879||2,631||3.1%|
(3) The establishment survey
The second survey asks employers to report jobs. It shows a similar pattern of growth as the household survey, giving us confidence in the result. Slow improvement. These are non-seasonally adjusted numbers.
|Description||March 2011||March 2012||Change||Change|
(4) Measures of Unemployment
(a) New claims for unemployment insurance – one of the most accurate and useful real-time metrics
Comparing the year over year change in the non-seasonally adjusted numbers (source here):
- last week in April 2011: 415,974
- week of 28 April 2012: 330,475 (-20% YoY) — likely to be revised up slightly
(b) The unemployment rate – a complex metric that gets far too much attention
The analysts at BLS calculate six measures of unemployment, from narrow to broad definitions. None is more real than the others; none are easily comparable to the rough estimates of unemployment during the 1930s (the first reliable surveys were in the early 1940s). Most people consider U-3, or U-4, or U-5 as the most useful measure. U-6 includes people with part-time jobs who prefer full-time work, and so includes underemployment.
Any way you count it, unemployment has decreased during the past year. Slowly.
(5) Another important metric: wages and hours worked
April 2011 vs. April 2012 (seasonally adjusted):
- Average private nonfarm hours worked per week: 34.4 vs. 34.5 no significant change)
- Average hourly earnings of nonfarm private workers: $22.97 vs. $23.38 (up 1.7%)
(6) For more information about the US economy
- A certain casualty of the recession: the US Government’s solvency, 25 November 2008
- We have been warned. Death of the post-WWII geopolitical regime, 28 November 2008
- Beginning of the end of the Republic’s solvency. Soon come the first steps to a reformed regime – or a new regime., 14 August 2009
- Another crack in Republic’s foundations: not the size of the debt, but when it’s due, 30 October 2009
- A look at our government’s debt – rising because we like to spend, 29 December 2009
- See the very essence of the US government’s financial problems (clue: it’s us), 2 April 2010
- A status report about the US economy (we party so hard we cannot hear the alarms ringing), 27 March 2012
- The Robot Revolution arrives, and the world changes, 20 April 2012
This post originally appeared at Fabius Maximus and is posted with permission.
3 Responses to “About the April Jobs Report – No New Jobs, a Result Bought at Great Cost”
Oh, so we can't print an economy out of Federal Reserve bank notes? You mean all that computer power does not lead to production of a real money? Well then, how are we to keep subsidizing all the worlds healthcare and military production?
Absolutely excellent article- I sent a copy to my son.
We will simply use compter keystrokes of course, like points at a basketball game. Did you ever see a carney run out of tickets for his Ferris wheel?