Global Macro Monitor had good charts of the jobs report over the Easter weekend. I didn’t report on them because I was away for the weekend. But the first chart’s visual is similar to the one I showed you two weeks ago on job creation. As I said then, the chart looks good for Obama. If the pattern holds, then the chart will be a good one come the general elections in the fall because it will line up better with what people are feeling by that time. I don’t think it will but let’s see what happens.
In any event, a lot of people are still pooh-poohing the recovery because it has been so slow. Just to remind you, three years ago I said Technical recovery won’t feel like a recovery to most because this was a ‘fake recovery‘ predicated on monetary and fiscal stimulus. My contention all along has been that the underlying systemic issue of excess private sector indebtedness has merely been masked and it will re-assert itself in the next downturn. In the meantime, overindebted consumers are not going to turbo charge the economy by running up fantastic debts, especially when the housing ATM is out of dollar bills. That will keep unemployment high. The policy goal is to forestall the inevitable reduction in debt ratios and to even promote a modest releveraging. There are not only signs that consumers have started releveraging to a certain degree, there are also tentative signs of lenders loosening the purse strings, even going into the subprime market with gusto. So this is working, and that’s why you see the GDP figures going up.
Why? David Frum has a good take on this:
Friday’s weak jobs report is more than a disappointing blip.
It is a glimpse ahead of our disappointing future.
Nearly three years from the beginning of the economic recovery in the summer of 2009, the U.S. economy has replaced not even half the jobs lost in the slump of 2007-2009. At the current pace of job creation, it will take until 2017 to replace all the jobs lost.
But of course the population has grown since 2007, so “replacement” is not good enough. We are even further away from equaling the employment rate of 2007 — the proportion of the working-age population at work.
The new jobs being added to the U.S. economy pay less, on average, than the jobs lost — which is why the average rate of pay in the United States remains stagnant or even drops as the number of jobs slowly grows.
At the top of the economic heap, recovery has been more complete. The richest Americans suffered sharp shocks to their wealth when markets collapsed in 2008-2009. As financial markets have revived, so has the wealth of the top 1% (households earning more than $380,000 per year.)
The top 5% have done OK, too. (The top 5% begins a little south of $200,000 in household income.)
For most of the country, however, the outlook is — to borrow Peck’s title — “pinched.” Young people who come of age in the crisis will earn less through their lives than those who came of age during happier times. Marriages break up. Babies are not born. A sense of unfairness spreads through the society. Politics becomes angrier and more paranoid — for those who take part — while many others drop out of public life entirely, disregarded and alienated.
My view is that the stock market has gotten way ahead of itself. Easy money has caused people to pile into risk assets as risk seeks return in a zero-rate environment. The real economy is nowhere near as robust as the increase in shares would have you believe. Moreover, even the falling earnings growth is telling you this.
Bottom line: The US economy is getting a sugar high from easy money, economic stimulus, and the typical cyclical aides to GDP that have promoted some modest releveraging. But the underlying issues of excess household indebtedness, particularly as related to housing and increasingly student debt, will keep this recovery from being robust until more of the debts are written down or paid off. That means the cyclical boost that comes from hiring to meet anticipated demand, construction spending, and increased capital spending isn’t going to happen at a good clip. Meanwhile, people are really struggling.
The hope is we can keep this going for long enough so that the cyclical hiring trends pick up before overindebted consumers get fatigued again. Underneath things are very fragile. Any setback in the economy will be met with populist outrage – that you can bet on. My worry is that shares could get hit pretty hard in the next few months if margins start to compress as I anticipate they will. Can Ben Bernanke ride to the rescue during the general election season with QE3? I’m pretty sceptical.
3 Responses to “The Economy Is Nowhere Near as Robust as Stocks Would Have You Believe”
The employment to population rate has stayed the same since Sept. 2009, 2 and a half years. Housing prices continue to nudge down, debt overhang has yet to be resolved for banks and consumers. Stimulus is needed but the political opinion refuses to agree. Between 1933-1937 the unemployment rate dropped from 25% to 9.6% because of public jobs and "stimulus". We'll have to wait for things to get worse before they will get better. http://benL8.blogspot.com – my blog
This "economy" is a nightmarish mess!
Uncle Ben will spend till he runs out of ink…..