This is a thematic post, I am also putting outside the paywall because there is a lot of chatter today about Spain needing to tap EU bailout funds this year. The messaging in the analyst community follows the thematic prediction I made in October 2010 about periphery countries missing targets and this creating a renewed crisis in the euro zone. Just to quote briefly to fix on how this will proceed, I wrote On the Troika’s Coming Occupation of the Periphery:
Translation: continue fiscal austerity until you reduce your deficits significantly. If the depression this creates causes you to miss your fiscal targets, redouble your efforts under the watchful eye of the Troika.
Portugal is out making additional cuts and increasing taxes (link in Spanish). Nevertheless, Olli Rehn has already indicated that Portugal runs the risk of not making its 2011 fiscal targets (link in Portuguese). Even Spain, not under an IMF program, will miss fiscal targets.
So, it is only a matter of time before what is happening in Greece happens at a minimum in Portugal and probably in Ireland as well.
While Ireland and Portugal are already in IMF programs, the worry now is that Spain will follow. Let me break down the different threads briefly. Here are the principal stories I am hearing.
Troika Program: The rumor roiling markets is that contingency is being made for Spain to access the Troika programs. The government has denied these rumors. But they persist nonetheless. And this is not the first time we have heard this. Read On the alleged plans for a Spanish bailout from November of last year. I am sceptical but this is what’s being said.
El Pais wrote just today that the European Commission is actually trying to force Spain into the bailout fund so as to help restructure the banking system there. I will have more to say about this below but the bottom line is that EU officials are not convinced the Spanish government’s plan for recapping the banks will be enough. In any event, Spanish 10 year bonds are at 5.36% and the stock market is down nearly 10%. German officials are saying you reap what you sow because Spain unilaterally flouted its deficit target and it is now paying the price. “The yields are the proof. They are paying the price”. Fitch has said the unilateral move to miss the target has damaged Spain’s “fiscal credibility”.
But let’s be clear this has been in the works for months now. As an aside, I should point out that it was clear these targets were too high for Spain. Read Edward Hugh’s October 2010 post “Is A 6 percent 2011 Deficit Realistically Within Reach For Spain?” He predicted in real time that Spain would not make the 6% hurdle. More than that though, I wrote in November and December and January where the Spanish were preparing us for just this.
- Aznar: Spain will show fiscal discipline but we may need the ECB to avoid a “disaster”, Nov 2012
- Spanish government doubts it can achieve deficit target, Jan 2012
So let’s not act like this is a surprise. The Europeans are in a policy bind here because their stated goal is austerity and growth at the same time. There is no way the periphery is making targets. Either the EU has to relax the targets and let them go for growth or continue down the line of crushing austerity, redoubling efforts if targets are missed. I predict they will do the latter because countries like the Netherlands which have proved deficit fetishists are also in jeopardy. I anticipate the Dutch will redouble efforts and will require the same of the periphery.
Hidden/Contingent Debt: Spain has a government debt to GDP level lower than Germany or France. And it is this fact which holds them in good stead. However, if one looks closer, one sees a lot of contingent liabilities that are liable to come due shortly. Edward Hugh has been banging on about this for a while now (See the August 2010 post “Controlling The Uncontrollable: Spain’s National Addiction To The Use Of “Dinero B”“. Now this issue seems to be entering mainstream discourse. Edward framed it this way in 2010:
What Spain’s central, local and regional government does is take advantage of loopholes in Eurostat accounting regulations to generate debt that really is debt, but is not classified as such according to the Eurostat excess deficit criteria. Key areas involved are debts on the balance sheets of state (or regionally, or locally) owned companies, overdue payments for receivables (very common practice in Spain), and public-private-partnership-type leaseback-arrangements. None of these are (typically) classified as debt, though they do all have to be paid at some point, which means there is a stream of revenue (flow) impact rather than a debt (stock) one (unless and until Eurostat changes the rules). Which means that while they do not impact that critical debt to GDP number, servicing these liabilities does exacerbate the annual fiscal deficit one. Which is why ultimately bringing Spain’s fiscal deficit under control will almost certainly prove to be much harder work than it seems.
Long story short, Spain’s debt levels will be a lot higher before it peaks, maybe as high as 100% debt to GDP.
Weak banking system: And remember, we are talking about debt that is on the books already. There are the contingent bank liabilities as well, the sort of thing that has got Ireland into trouble, when it assumed it’s banks’ debt. First, the discussion in the media recently has been about Spanish bank addiction to the ECB lending facilities. What is happening is that Spanish financial institutions are playing the carry trade in a major way. The banks are borrowing from the ECB (against Spanish sovereign collateral in all probability) and then buying Spanish sovereign debt, which has a much higher yield. They can do this for another three years as the LTRO facility is a three year program. This scheme has been beneficial in two respects. First, it provides the banks with cheap funding that they can use in a carry trade to recapitalise on the sly over the next three years. Second, it is a backdoor monetisation of sovereign debt as it is intended to be. Italian banks are playing the same game, as I predicted they would in November.
This arrangement will not last in my view. At some point, as peripheral countries begin to miss targets, the crisis will flare. In January I said the fireworks will start with Spain or Italy. But now Spain and Portugal look to be the countries where the euro crisis is now most acute.
Housing: Where Spain’s banks are vulnerable is in housing and land. Land and property values are still sinking in Spain (as they are in the US and Ireland, two other former bubble economies). This will continue to be a drag on growth. However, the more pressing concern is how this impacts financial institutions’ balance sheets because Spanish banks have not taken the credit writedowns the Irish banks have done. Willem Buiter of Citigroup has come out with a missive that says things will get a lot worse and that Spain will need to get into a Troika program just like Greece, Portugal, and Ireland.
The decline in Spanish land and property prices appears far from complete (probably less than half complete). The General IMIE Index, an indicator created by Tinsa, increased its year-on-year decline in February, and fell by 9.5% – returning to the levels of 2004. The cumulative decline in the General IMIE Index from the top of the market in December 2007 was 27.1%.In addition to the hidden legacy losses carried by the Spanish banks, new property- and real estate-related losses are likely to come their way as a result of further property price declines. The Spanish banks are unlikely to be able to absorb these losses. If these institutions are deemed too important to fail, these losses could migrate to the public sector, which could have severe problems carrying them.
Preparing for this contingency may be one reason that the Germans have relented on increasing the size of European bailout funds (by running the EFSF and ESM concurrently). In the context of the other hidden liabilities and missed targets, losses migrating to the sovereign would be fatal for Spanish sovereign debt, even with the ECB monetisation scheme in place.
Local government: Spain’s central government does not have control over the spending of autonomous regions in Spain. In the past, there has been a lot of chatter about forcing these governments to consolidate because their deficits are accounted for in the Spanish deficit figures. The problem then is that these local governments are not consolidating. In Andulucia, where unemployment runs even higher than the national 21%, the Partido Popular failed to get an absolute majority and they were therefore defeated in elections this past weekend by a coalition from the left to be led of the socialist party (PSOE). PSOE is not going to go along with the austerity train in Andalucia. And so the fear is that this will make the deficit targets difficult for 2012.
Bottom Line: Willem Buiter gets the nod here
The risk of a Spanish debt restructuring is higher now than it’s been since the beginning of the crisis, said Citigroup Inc. chief economist William Buiter in a research comment published Wednesday. “Spain looks likely to enter some form of a troika program this year, as a condition for further European Central Bank support for the Spanish sovereign and/or Spanish banks,” said the former Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee member.
I am not sure the die is cast. I am always optimistic. But, admittedly things are certainly deteriorating for Spain. This is a situation which has the potential to cause significant portfolio damage if not contained appropriately.
This post originally appeared at Credit Writedowns and is posted with permission.
3 Responses to “On Spain’s Coming Under the Watchful Eye of the Troika in 2012”
All this effort to cut public spending can't solve by itself the deficit problem of G.I.P.S.I. (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, Italy), since with the budget cuts comes the squeeze of the GDP and again the deficit measured as percentage of GDP grows. The only solution can be economic growth, either thru increasing exports, that works well also to reduce external debts, and/or increase domestic private consumption, without to increase the public deficit in absolute values
The only way i know how to increase export in the short term is by improving the competitiveness of the country, and it is easy to say but since devaluation in the Euro zone is technically impossible, hard to do. The very best solution in this case is to make the labor market as flexible as possible. It is amazing to see, that 50% of Spanish youth are unemployed, and the veteran employed, organized in unions, fight without compromise to keep the rights, they achieved during the times of plenty. I wonder the unemployed youth are not the sons and daughters of the older? In this times of crisis increased flexibility, and opening to competition can create a major change in efficiency and with it hopefully the so much desired economic growth. Definitely keeping the youth out of work force is very unproductive.
As how to increase the private sector and reduce the public sector, it has to be done by privatization. Selling public assets in the time of crisis is correct from many aspects. First this can bring cash, that can help pay back the loans, second it increases the efficiency of the privatized company, that will probably pay more taxes than the state owned company (including even the dividends it paid), and again it can increase the efficiency of the economy, if the privatization is done properly, meaning that with the process of privatization some monopolies, that usually enjoy these state owned companies, are broken. Again increasing competition by braking big monopolies or small closed guilds, is always prosperous. As to the question what professional guild has to stay and what not, has to be answered with another question "Whom are we protecting?, the costumers or the suppliers". With the answer to this question, the solution will be obvious.
Of course this process needs political courage, something that is always very much in need. Yet after what happened to Greece, i hope the politicians understood, that they can't cheat everybody all the time, sometime the truth has to be said and the right decision has to be made, even if the positive effects of their decisions will come after the end of their political mandate. Still, to postponed the inevitable until there is no other choice means, as you correctly said, an other Greece is right behind the corner.
Again and again and again…the urban legend of "internal devaluation". Could you tell me one, just one example where the "internal devaluation" worked in order to boost a country’s exports, growth and employment? Exports are a function of salaries only??? Have you ever heard about added value? I bet that a country does not manage to export high added valued products by reducing salaries…
Additionally someone who adopts, light-heartedly, the argument of "internal devaluation" has to examine how much the “high” salaries are responsible of inflation. If the prices of traded sector products are rising because of monopolistic and oligopolistic situation within the economy, even if you cut salaries, prices would have still climb. This is the case for Greece. Income has been reduced by 30% on average and Greece still has the higher inflation within the euro-zone.
Please stop believes in myths and sees the facts. Please stop misleading the public debate about the real causes of the crisis and the real solutions….
Mr Tobin, i have to tell you, you entirely misunderstood my comment, (or was it intentional misinterpretation?). Did i anywhere in my comment mentioned salary cuts as solution?
When i wrote "The very best solution in this case is to make the labor market as flexible as possible ", i meant and explained, that this is the only way to let the new generation of youth to enter the labor market and letting them to replace the veterans. It maybe would have some effect on the wage costs too, but the young peoples' main contribution to the economy would be, that they would shake the old ways and the old customs in the working places. These are the customs and behaviors, that actually brought the GIPSI states economies into where they are now. I also believe, the young generation, that in average should be better educated and better equipped for the new technologies, when entering the working places, could improve immensely the economic situation of these states. So closing before the youth the opportunities of jobs, just to keep the veterans in their positions is unsocial, uneconomic and unmoral. I also mention the need to brake the monopolies and other protected occupation, could bring more efficiency into the economy and with it economic growth.
Calling me misleading and spreading myths, is a very best ending of your ignorant – arrogant misleading response.