Pick your poison. In the words of Greek Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos, the choice facing Greece today in the wake of its deal with the so-called “Troika” (the ECB, IMF, and EU) is “to choose between difficult decisions and decisions even more difficult. We unfortunately have to choose between sacrifice and even greater sacrifices in incomparably more dearly.” Of course, Venizelos implied that failure to accept the latest offer by the Troika is the lesser of two sacrifices. And the markets appeared to agree, selling off on news that the deal struck between the two parties was coming unstuck after weeks of building up expectations of an imminent conclusion.
In our view, the market’s judgment is wrong: an outright default might ultimately prove the better tonic for both Greece and the euro zone.
The only questions that remain to be resolved are these: have all of the parties begun preparations to mitigate the ultimate impact of an outright default by Athens? And will the ECB be sufficiently aggressive in combating the inevitable speculative attacks on the other members of the euro zone periphery, which are almost certain to ensue, once Greece is “resolved” one way or the other.
Within the Troika, the Germans in particular have been the champions of taking the toughest line possible against the Greeks and other “Mediterranean profligates”. But however stubborn Berlin appears to be, the Merkel Administration is certainly not stupid. At this juncture, it seems more rational to view their ongoing promotion of fiscal austerity as a political smokescreen: In reality, what Germany likely wants to do in the case of Greece is trigger is an involuntary default so that the other PIIGS don’t get the wrong idea and ask for a similarly large haircut on their debts. They realize the consequences that might follow, as the others gear up for similar treatment. Far easier were Greece to move toward involuntary default, in the eyes of Berlin.
Politically, of course, the Merkel government can’t actually come out and advocate a Greek default or, indeed, outright expulsion from the euro zone. Far more politically astute to promote fiscal austerity on top of yet more fiscal austerity, (even though that is certainly not winning Mrs. Merkel any popularity points in Greece), until the Greeks themselves scream “Uncle!” and default outright.
It helps domestically as well. According to polls, Angela Merkel is now the most popular politician in Germany, which is why she persists with this pernicious narrative that the problems of Greece all stem from fiscal profligacy and laziness, in contrast to the responsible and hard-working German people.
Ultimately, though an involuntary default carries risks for the stability of the euro payments system, a deal, per the terms outlined in the press, is bad for Greece. And probably even worse for global markets, especially the bond markets.
Either eventuality creates problems but default is probably the less bad option longer term. Let me elaborate:
Greece is a hopelessly uncompetitive economy that probably shouldn’t be in the euro zone. But can you surgically detach Greece if it defaults, without some sort of impact on the entire euro payments system?
And what will the impact be on Greece itself? The country currently runs a primary budget deficit (excluding interest payments on debt) of around 5% of GDP. Were it to default, Athens would be forced to go cold turkey (“cold Greece”?) until the primary fiscal deficit (now around 5% of GDP) is balanced. Maybe the government could suspend all military expenditures as a first pass? At the very least, they can stop buying German military equipment!
No question, that under a default, a lot of public sector employees will be sacked, pensions will be at risk, and unemployment will almost certainly go higher. However, were the country to revert to the drachma, they would likely be left with a substantially weaker currency, which could ultimately provide the country with the wherewithal to compete in the global economy. With a super-cheap exchange rate, Greece would be a Mecca for retirement homes, research hospitals, trans-European liberal arts colleges, and maybe low-overhead software startups. Plus, a permanent home for the Olympics. It could live happily ever after, as Florida does, on the pension income of the elderly and the beer money of the young.
This would be the source of the foreign transfers that the private banking sector won’t make anymore. In Greece’s case that credit went to the public sector and a lot of it built useful infrastructure, so it’s not a waste, but the first step is surely to cancel the debts and stop the illusion that they can be paid. And it would end the “death by 1000 cuts” currently being imposed on the Troika, which will serve no useful economic, political or social purpose.
Of course, there will be a slew of defaults and an endless series of court cases, litigation, etc., much as there was when Argentina defaulted in 2001. But it would force the issue of debt restructuring on the table in a meaningful way and at least provide Greece with light at the end of the tunnel.
To ensure some sort of viability of the drachma, the Greek government would have to find a more credible means of ensuring tax compliance. Most Greeks with money have presumably already moved it beyond the reach of the Greek banking system, so that savings would not be wiped out. As the tide of repossessions begins, many of these oligarchs would likely start to buy back the Greek assets on the cheap, as it is doubtful that the euro banks will want anything to with them.
Beyond that, it would be important for Athens to establish a new tax system that minimises tax evasion, so as to create demand for the new drachma immediately, and mitigate the formation of an extensive parallel transactions currency. After all, it is possible that many Greeks might prefer to use the existing stock of euros in the country and there is very little the EU authorities could do to stop this (much as the US government could not prevent Panama from dollarising its economy). But in order to establish a long-lasting demand for drachmas, two things would have to happen:
1. The Greek government would announce that it will begin taxing exclusively in the new currency.
2. The Greek government would announce that it will make all payments in the new currency.
Given the country’s history of tax evasion on income tax, a national real estate tax would likely work better than a new income tax.
(See here for more details)
On the other hand, the challenge for the European Union authorities is to ensure that speculative capital is not unleashed on the next weakest link in the chain – say, Portugal – to ensure that there is an adequate firewall established and to minimise disruptions to the entire euro payments system. It’s unclear to me whether the euro zone authorities have truly thought this aspect through and considered the best means to prevent a major disruption of the EMU payments system. Then again, perhaps this is what the ECB’s new programs are really all about.
On the other hand, I happen to think a rescue of the sort that is now being publicly mooted is worse for both sides. The imposition of yet more fiscal austerity on Greece will exacerbate the debt deflation dynamics which are destroying the country and will provide Greece with ZERO means of servicing even the reduced levels of debt. The country will still remain uncompetitive and depression like conditions will continue, with the ongoing burden of more euro denominated debt servicing.
More dangerous is the risk that comes if there is a “successful” deal: It come with the pending question- ‘if Greece doesn’t have to pay, why do I’- The Irish are asking that question already, and I’m sure the Portuguese and Spanish will soon be asking the same thing. As my friend Warren Mosler has noted:
Possible immediate consequences of that discussion include a sharp spike in gold, silver, and other commodities in a flight from currency, falling equity and debt valuations, a banking crisis, and a tightening of ‘financial conditions’ in general from portfolio shifting, even as it’s fundamentally highly deflationary. And while it probably won’t last all that long, it will be long enough to seriously shake things up.
Longer term, a Greek default could well provoke the question, “What on earth do governments issue bonds for anyway?” That might well provoke a far more provocative debate on the nature of modern money and the self-imposed legal constraints with which sovereign governments bind themselves in their conduct of fiscal policy. But that’s probably best left to the pages of another blog post!
This post originally appeared at New Economic Perspectives and is posted with permission.
12 Responses to “Greece: A Default Is a Better Outcome Than the Deal on Offer”
i like this blog/
why do Greece need to leave the euro zone if she defaults on her bonds?
More austerity measures to greece (from the troika) will almost guarantee a Greek default.
Then the sharks (markets) will smell "blood" for Italy, Spain and the rest of the periphery and the break-up of the euro-zone will be a matter of time. Hit by hard unemployment and long recession, the peripheral euro-countries will be defaulting on their debts and going back to their own currencies.
In such a scenario the Euro (and maybe part of the American) banking systems will certainly collapse. Imagine Lehman multiplied by 10.
It costs ALOT LESS to save Greece and gradually (in 1-2 years) bring stability and lower interest-rates to the euro-periphery (so their debts can be manageble again), than let Greece default and start the break-up of the eurozone. Which will cause not only a financial but also a political tsunami with unknown consequences.
Is the worlds economy "ready" for such a scenario?
Let me tell you something very simple : whatever the troika or the world expects greece to do , they will not do it , is as simple as that , and the reason for that is that there is no one to do it , people and politicians have been muted over the last 30 years to incompetent crooked minds that can not think straight or clearly or logically or responsibly or ethically or whatever is that that will take for anything to be done .Forget it . Is like asking me to compose a classical symphony , no matter what i promise or how many papers i will sign or how many days and nights i will spend composing , you will hear no symphony from me , and i am sorry to say that , as a greek i am sorry more than you can ever imagine .
One Big Taxable Domestic Client still exists and everybody forgets them! They should also be called upon to put in their share of Money. that is the Greek Orthodox Church. Why are they tax Free on all of their immense fortune and real-estates. The Greek shipping Magnates could also pay repatriate a few billion US Dollars, GB Pounds and Swiss Francs all together to save their nation?
Greece should negotiate the haircut of the remaining 30% of their debt and then say bye-bye to the bureucracy of Europe.
Then restructure their economy, public sector, healthcare and pension system, price the tourist-industry competitively and attract foreign investment to explore their gas reserves between Crete and Cyprus.
Greece could flourish in 5 years time if the had some serious people (politicians) running things.
They have the 3rd largest shipping fleet in the world. A sector that could also flourish.
If I were Greek I would do that. And I guess it would also be the best for the Euro-zone, because it is the only possible way to bring Greece back to competitiveness.
Debt level is to high agreed. Deficit to high, true. Economy very uncompetitive, granted. etc.
The current process focusing on budgetary discipline reforms and can be seen as a death by "a thousand cuts" with all the painful side effects. At least it provides a time line for reform and an independent review (with teeth) to confirm the execution.
Whether this avoids further action or a default is open.
The proposed exit from the European Union assumes that Greece (politicians, government apparatus etc..) will be able to reform their operations on their own. I don't see that this can be achieved without external supervision in a timely fashion. In doing so I might overestimated the temptation to go back to pre-EU patterns shying away from reforms.
Addressing the real inefficiencies of the Greek reality is not fair to the other EU members, but if addressed within the union it could strengthen the processes by allowing for a real test, strengthen the perception of the union and deter others from following Greece's path.
I believe that the issue in Greece can be best described by the following. As the saying goes" if it looks like a camel and smells like a camel it probably is a camel". Unfortunately in Greece's case it is called a Government, might also smell like one or even perform (act) as one, but, I would argue, it isn't one. At least not in the way a government is perceived in most of the western world. The real issue is the governments inability to execute and hold it constituting members accountable for their actions. It is a mentality. This feels as an educational problem and eventually needs generations (1-2) to be addressed.
Whether this is something that the EU can afford or should bother to address or not, depends on what the union is all about. A union that has "exits" would set a precedent. It also would taint the concept of a union and its future path.
it doesn't…that's the biggest lie / misconception floating around….Greece can (it really should) default within the Euro.
There is no provision for expelling a member in the current Euro treaties and modifications to the treaty will require Greek approval!
The Finance Minister of Greece should become the Finance Minister of Germany, and the Finance Minister of Germany should become the Finance Minister of Greece, and both given full authority to implement their programs. Of course, anthropolgists must be assigned to document, and casts of Saturday Night Live and Monti Python must be allowed to witness and report the weekly events.