Herman Cain’s bizarre 9-9-9 plan would replace much of the current tax code with a 9 percent individual income tax and a 9 percent sales tax. He calls it a “flat tax.”
This week Rick Perry is set to announce his own version of a flat tax. Former House majority leader Dick Armey – now chairman of Freedom Works, a major backer of the Tea Party funded by the Koch Brothers and other portly felines (I didn’t say “fat cats”) — predicts this will give Perry “a big boost.” Steve Forbes, one of America’s richest billionaires, who’s on the board of the Freedom Works foundation, is delighted. He’s been pushing the flat tax for years.
The flat tax is a fraud. It raises taxes on the poor and lowers them on the rich.
We don’t know exactly what Perry will propose, but the non-partisan Tax Policy Center estimates that Cain’s plan (the only one out there so far) would lower the after-tax incomes of poor households (incomes below $30,000) by 16 to 20 percent, while increasing the incomes of wealthier households (incomes above $200,000) by 5 to 22 percent, on average.
Under Cain’s plan, fully 95 percent of households with more than $1 million in income would get an average tax cut of $487,300. And capital gains (a major source of income for the very rich) would be tax free.
The details of flat-tax proposals vary, of course. But all of them end up benefitting the rich more than the poor for one simple reason: Today’s tax code is still at least moderately progressive. The rich usually pay a higher percent of their incomes in income taxes than do the poor. A flat tax would eliminate that slight progressivity.
Nowadays most low-income households pay no federal income tax at all – a fact that sends many regressives into spasms of indignation. They conveniently ignore the fact that poor households pay a much larger share of their incomes in payroll taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes (directly, if they own their homes; indirectly, if they rent) than do people with high incomes.
Flat-taxers pretend a flat tax is good public policy, for two reasons.
First, they say, it would simplify paying taxes. Baloney. Flat-tax proposals don’t eliminate popular deductions. (I’ll be surprised if Perry’s plan eliminates the popular mortgage-interest deduction, for example.) So most tax payers would still have to fill out lots of forms.
Second, they say a flat tax is fairer than the current system because, in Cain’s words, a flat tax “treats everyone the same.”
The truth is the current tax code treats everyone the same. It’s organized around tax brackets. Everyone whose income reaches the same bracket is treated the same as everyone else whose income reaches that bracket (apart from various deductions, exemptions, and credits, of course).
For example, no one pays any income taxes on the first $20,000 or so of their income (the exact amount depends on whether the person is married and eligible for tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit of the Family Tax Credit.)
People in higher brackets pay a higher rate only on the portion of their income that hits that bracket — not on their entire incomes.
So when Barack Obama calls for ending the Bush tax cut on incomes over $250,000, he’s only talking about the portion peoples’ incomes that exceed $250,000. He’s not proposing to tax their entire incomes at the higher rate that prevailed under Bill Clinton.
Republicans have tried to sow confusion about this. They want Americans to believe, for example, that if the Bush tax cut ended, small business owners with incomes of $251,000 a year would suddenly have to pay 39 percent of their entire incomes in taxes rather than 35 percent. Wrong. They’d only have to pay the 39 percent rate on $1,000 – the portion of their incomes over $250,000.
Get it? We already have a flat tax – flat within each bracket.
The real problem is the top brackets are set too low relative to where the money is. The top-most bracket starts at $375,000 a year. People with incomes higher than that pay 35 percent – again, only on that portion of their incomes exceeding $375,000.
This is absurd. It means a professional who’s making, say, $380,000 a year pays the same income-tax rate as a plutocrat pulling in $2 billion or $20 billion.
Our current flat tax at the top is treating the nation’s professional class exactly the same as it treats super-rich plutocrats. My doctor pays the same rate as Steve Forbes.
Actually, it’s worse than that because the plutocrats get most of their income in the form of capital gains, which are taxed at only 15 percent. That’s why America’s 400 richest people – who earned an average of $300 million last year, and who have more wealth than the bottom 150 million Americans put together – now pay at a 17 percent rate (according to the IRS).
The Republicans’ push for a flat tax masks what’s really going on.
Remember: The top 1 percent is now raking in over 20 percent of the nation’s total income and owns over 35 percent of the nation’s wealth. Under almost anyone’s view of fairness, these are grotesque portions. They’re especially large relative to what they were as recently as thirty years ago, when the top 1 percent raked in under 10 percent. And these huge portions at the top continue to increase.
Meanwhile, the top tax bracket is now 35 percent — the lowest it’s been in three decades. Between the end of World War II and 1980 it never fell below 70 percent.
Simple fairness requires three things: More tax brackets at the top, higher rates in each bracket, and the treatment of all sources of income (capital gains included) exactly the same.
Not only fairness demands it, but also fiscal prudence. A truly progressive tax would bring in tens of billions of dollars a year from the people at the top who are in the best position to afford it.
Regressives are pushing the flat tax as a smokescreen. They’d rather not have anyone talk about the unfairness and fiscal absurdity of the current system.
Rather than merely oppose the flat tax, sensible people should push for a truly progressive tax – starting with a top rate of 70 percent on that portion of anyone’s income exceeding $5 million, from whatever source.
This post originally appeared at Robert Reich’s Blog and is reproduced with permission.
14 Responses to “The Flat-Tax Fraud, and the Necessity of a Truly Progressive Tax”
[...] The Flat-Tax Fraud, and the Necessity of a Truly Progressive TaxEconoMonitor (blog)This week Rick Perry is set to announce his own version of a flat tax. Former House majority leader Dick Armey ? now chairman of Freedom Works, a major backer of the Tea Party funded by the Koch Brothers and other portly felines (I didn't say ?fat …and more » [...]
You just make the far rights point for them by proposing a 70% rate above even obsene income. It's possible to greatly simplify the tax code, limiting deductions dramatically to a select few and a reasonable progressive rate structure that targets revenue at X% of GDP.
[...] offers tax plan that cannot be able Gloucester County Times – NJ.com Financial Times - EconoMonitor (blog)all 1,093 news [...]
[...] Under Steve Forbes' plan the flat rate …Algebra formula gives tax solutionYuma SunThe Flat-Tax Fraud, and the Necessity of a Truly Progressive TaxEconoMonitor (blog)Romney, Once a Critic, Hedges on Flat-Tax PlansNew York TimesBrazil Times [...]
Hey! I know this is kinda off topic however I’d figured I’d ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest writing a blog post or vice-versa? My site addresses a lot of the same topics as yours and I feel we could greatly benefit from each other. If you’re interested feel free to send me an email. I look forward to hearing from you! Excellent blog by the way!
This it is a great piece of information. But first of all I must salute all every one. . And second I must say that I m thinking to post http://www.economonitor.com/blog/2011/10/the-flat… on my Facebook profile. I will do this because finally I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really very good information. When I saw this tittle, EconoMonitor : EconoMonitor » The Flat-Tax Fraud, and the Necessity of a Truly Progressive Tax, on google search I was very glad. It is possible I found something that have the same ideea here http://www.xbileteavion.ro, I’m not sure but I thing it was the same. All the best
This blog does not show up properly on my android – you might want to try and fix that
What is here it is an interesting piece of information this is the reason why I post a link to you in one of my site your link is here . But first of all I must salute all the visitors. Hello there. After this I must say that I will post http://www.economonitor.com/blog/2011/10/the-flat… on my Facebook profile. I will do this because at long last I found what I was looking for. What you share here is really the best sharing. In the second I saw this tittle, EconoMonitor : EconoMonitor » The Flat-Tax Fraud, and the Necessity of a Truly Progressive Tax, on my google search I was very happy. It is possible I found something like this here http://www.toplevel-traduceri.ro/traduceri_rapide…, I’m not sure but I thing it was the same. My regrds
Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this site. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very hard to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and appearance. I must say that you’ve done a superb job with this. Additionally, the blog loads very fast for me on Firefox. Exceptional Blog!
I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about my difficulty. You are wonderful! Thanks!
Howdy! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from an established blog. Is it difficult to set up your own blog? I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty quick. I’m thinking about setting up my own but I’m not sure where to start. Do you have any points or suggestions? Appreciate it
I’m now not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic. I needs to spend some time finding out more or figuring out more. Thank you for excellent information I was searching for this info for my mission.
hello there and thank you for your info – I’ve definitely picked up anything new from right here. I did however expertise several technical points using this website, as I experienced to reload the website a lot of times previous to I could get it to load correctly. I had been wondering if your web host is OK? Not that I’m complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your quality score if ads and marketing with Adwords. Well I am adding this RSS to my email and can look out for much more of your respective exciting content. Ensure that you update this again very soon..
Work from your home Cash System Review and Coupon Discount.
This is actually the Work at home Cash System Coupon and Discount: Now, you can find Work from your home Cash System Coupon and Discount while using the blow link, as well as the Coupon comes from internet or official website, it is just a easy way available a budget goods from Home based Cash System.
Get the Work at home Cash System Coupon and Discount…
Around the Work from your home Cash System:
The day you see chance knocking at your door as well as as soon as you should answer it!
La and orange county Allen Walker and I am living the dream! Sometimes completely out of my home, whenever i wish to, we make Lots of money carrying it out! Get rid of Boss, early mornings, without any more awful co-workers!
Now could it have been always this simple for my children and i also? Generally not very…
See many years ago I needed an effective life being a Mailman, being home to my lady every day with no care on this planet. However, if my son Brayden got into the modern world all of it changed. I knew I could truthfully NEVER afford the lifestyle I wanted for my children. There is just ugh with my current income.
It absolutely killed me to find out that my financial future was just about for a stand still.
The thing is, everyday I delivered mail to your rich element of town. There were always one quiet guy named Dave that all occasionally I’d see him show up. I’d say hi, however say hi back, i would attempt my route.
Now although everyone at work made money Dave’s house used to be certainly the nicest!
After some time I seen that I never saw Dave leave his house, Yet he previously a mint red Ferrari in their driveway. Often however be in his robe regardless of whether he stumbled on get his mail!
Eventually it happened; Dave inquired about how things were going and that i mentioned how we just experienced a son. We laughed for a minute and joked about precisely how it is great to become a dad yet it is another mouth to secure. Furthermore, i jokingly said “guess it’s time to get another job!”
Find more detial for Home based Cash System…
It is indeed my Home based Cash System Review, if you can not trust me and you can post your review below.
I believe that really work From a home office Cash System may is definitely the leader company or supplier relative to other company on this planet. First, the Work At home Cash System’s products that may be so excellent and different from the other company, I prefer it a great deal of. second, the standard of Work at home Cash System’s service or product is very good, plus its batter than other company. Third, the job At home Cash System’s after-sales service is the perfect and quickest.
Great Benefits Get Home Cash System