(Yes, I know that isn’t saying much.)
Most people think that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had something to do with the financial crisis. Some people think that they were the major reason the crisis happened, which (to them) proves that activist government policy was the cause of the crisis. Other people, including me, think they were a modest contributing factor because they did buy a lot of securities that were backed by subprime loans, but they were well behind the curve when it came to mortgage “innovation” and the creation of toxic assets. But that’s not the question here.
The question now is what to do about them. Although they had been private, profit-seeking companies for forty years, they were taken over by government regulators in September 2008 when they had become clearly insolvent, and are still being operated in conservatorship. Because Fannie and Freddie were very, very long housing, they have suffered massive losses since the financial crisis began. But because the private mortgage securitization market has collapsed, they are the bulk of the secondary mortgage market at the moment, which means the housing market could collapse without them.
On Planet Money a couple of weeks ago, Bethany McLean and Joe Nocera took the cutely counter-intuitive position that the most bizarre mortgage product is the thirty-year fixed mortgage — and that it wouldn’t exist without Fannie and Freddie. Basically, their argument goes like this: Borrowers like thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages, but lenders should hate them. Because of the fixed rate, they carry interest rate risk, meaning that if market interest rates rise the value of the mortgage asset will fall. (If you hold it to maturity, you will still get the cash you expected, but if you are a traditional lender you are funding the mortgage with short-term liabilities, and the interest rates you pay on those will go up — as happened to the entire S&L sector in the 1970s.) Furthermore, they carry credit risk, since lots of things can happen to borrowers over thirty years, and as a result they might not pay you back.* So, according to McLean and Nocera, no banker in her right mind would sell such a product — not, that is, without Fannie and Freddie there to buy the mortgage and take the risk off her hands.** Their punch line is that although Americans like to complain about government intervention in the mortgage market, Americans also want their thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages, and you can’t have one without the other.
But this argument doesn’t make complete sense to me. If thirty-year fixed-rate assets are bad, that means no one would buy thirty-year U.S. Treasury bonds, yet people do (at 4.53 percent). A bank could originate a thirty-year fixed-rate mortgage and just buy an interest rate swap to hedge the interest rate risk. And if banks didn’t lend money to people because lots of things can happen to them that might interfere with their ability to repay, then they would never make business loans. Most businesses have much more volatile cash flows than someone with a good job. The first hedge against credit risk is the fact that you’re making lots of different mortgages to lots of different people, so you diversify away the specific risk in any given household. Now, it’s harder to hedge market risk — in this context, macroeconomic factors — especially if you do your lending in a local market. So the second hedge is that the mortgage is secured by the house, which means that as long as you have a reasonable loan-to-value ratio the bank is probably safe. And in any case, if you’re in traditional banking, macroeconomic risk is just part of your business.
The above also assumes that lenders are holding onto their loans. If they can sell their thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages on the secondary market, then the “problem” is completely off their hands. Yes, Fannie and Freddie are big players in the secondary market. But there’s no law of nature that says you can’t have a secondary market without them. What you need are standards, so that mortgages (or mortgage-backed securities) can be traded without investors having to look into every single mortgage. (For example, the development of standards for corn in (I think) the nineteenth century made it possible for different farmers to dump their corn into the same bin at one end of the railroad and for different buyers to take their corn out of the same bin at the other end — without every buyer having to verify her seller’s corn.) That’s one thing Fannie and Freddie provided with the conforming mortgage standards, but again, there’s no law that says that standards have to be set by companies with implicit government guarantees.
In fact, until recently we had a big secondary market for mortgages that didn’t rely on Fannie and Freddie — private mortgage securitization. Now, yes, I know as well as anyone that this turned out to be a big disaster. It turned into a disaster because the “standards” were set by credit rating agencies. But instead of setting strict criteria for underlying mortgages and then verifying that the actual mortgages met those criteria, the rating agencies used statistical models that attempted to predict how new, varied bundles of mortgages would perform, and they didn’t even do a very good job of verifying that the actual mortgages were consistent with the models. So in the end you had a secondary market that was vastly overpaying for crappy mortgages, and when everyone realized that, the market vanished.
So let’s think about what might happen if Fannie and Freddie didn’t exist. People would still want thirty-year fixed-rate mortgages, so some bank would try to originate them. That bank might just hedge the interest rate risk with interest rate swaps and hold onto the credit risk. This is what banks did during the postwar boom. In 1960, for example, banks and thrifts held about $116 billion in home mortgages; government-sponsored enterprises held about $3 billion, with about zero in mortgage pools.***
Alternatively, that bank might try to package and resell mortgages on the secondary market. It doesn’t really matter if they are sold as packages of loans or as tranched mortgage-backed securities. The important thing is that there are verifiable and verified standards so that investors don’t have to inspect all the mortgages. That could be a private sector function, or alternatively there could be a government agency to define conforming mortgage standards and verify that the loans in a given pool comply with those standards. But the government agency doesn’t also have to be buying the mortgages. If investors can be sure that mortgages are what they say they are, then someone will buy them: pension funds, insurance companies,**** hedge funds, rich people, etc.
Now, the question is, how much will they pay? The Planet Money episode with McLean and Nocera cited Bill Gross of PIMCO saying he would demand an extra three percentage points in yield for a mortgage without a Fannie/Freddie credit guarantee. Although Bill Gross is no doubt one of the smartest investors in the world, there are a couple of reasons to doubt this.
There are at least two ways to estimate what mortgage rates would be without Fannie and Freddie. First, we can look at Fannie and Freddie themselves. Until 2008, they were profit-seeking companies, meaning that they were already paying as little for mortgages as they could. Their competitive advantage in the market was their implicit government guarantee — people thought that, in a crisis, the federal government would bail them out and protect them from default — which meant they could borrow money more cheaply than, say, banks. Without Fannie and Freddie, the new replacement buyers would have higher funding costs, so the increase in the yields they demand should be roughly the same as the difference between their fundings costs and those of Fannie/Freddie. Major banks these days have credit ratings around A, which means they pay about 80 basis points more for seven-year debt than do Treasuries. (I use seven years because that’s roughly the average time before a mortgage is paid off.) Even if Fannie and Freddie were paying the same yield as the Treasury Department, that means that mortgage rates would only be about 80 bp higher without them.
Second, we can look at the spread between conforming mortgages and jumbo mortgages (which are too big to be bought by Fannie and Freddie). A quick search yields this paper by Anthony Sanders, which cites several other studies (see Table 1) that show the spread to be between 16 and 40 basis points.
(Now, Bill Gross might still be right. In today’s market, if a mortgage isn’t guaranteed by Fannie or Freddie, there must be something wrong with it, so maybe you should demand 300 bp more to buy it. But that’s an adverse selection problem that wouldn’t exist without Fannie and Freddie.)
So according to the back of the envelope at least, a world without Fannie and Freddie would not send mortgage rates into the stratosphere. But more importantly: so what if it did?
The immediate response is usually that middle class families wouldn’t be able to buy houses. But this isn’t quite right. Higher mortgage rates mean buyers can’t spend as much on houses. But that means the demand curve would shift down and housing prices would come down; people would still need to move, they would still need to sell their houses, and the market would clear at a lower price level.
The market would also clear at a lower quantity, which means that over time the homeownership rate could go down. But this isn’t as big a problem as it sounds. It’s not like a consumer product market where lower quantity means less stuff. We’ll still have the houses we have; they’re not being destroyed. In fact, the current problem with the housing market is that we have too much housing stock for the number of households in the country (a point often made by Calculated Risk). Since housing at the margin can shift between homeownership and rental, whether a housing unit is used for one or the other doesn’t matter from the standpoint of total production. If we want to soak up the glut of housing, we need new household formation (e.g., people moving out of their parents’ houses). That is more likely to occur if the price of housing comes down. And only when the glut is soaked up will there be a reason for developers to build more.
Instead, one major effect of higher mortgage rates would be distributional: lower housing prices would hurt people who own houses (like me) and help people who don’t. In general, this means hurting the rich and helping the less rich, and that sounds like a good thing to me from a simplistic Rawlsian perspective. But that’s probably the main reason why our government has spent so much effort subsidizing mortgages and propping up the price of houses.
Then there’s the wealth effect, which is fictional on the one hand but unfortunately real on the other. If you have $100,000 in cash and a $300,000 house, and tomorrow the value of your house falls to $250,000 because all housing prices have fallen, you are exactly as rich as you were the day before for most practical purposes, assuming you still want to live in a house. You still have $100,000 and one house.(There are exceptions, like if you plan to move someplace where houses are cheaper, in which case you will end up slightly worse off.) But unfortunately, you feel $50,000 poorer, and that may crimp your consumption, hurting the economy. So if we’re going to move to a world where the government doesn’t suppress mortgage rates, we’ll have to do it gradually.
So here’s my not-very-thought-through proposal: Fannie and Freddie should continue doing what they are doing, as wards of the federal government. But every year, for each $1 in assets that get paid off, they should only invest $0.50 in new mortgages (the rest should reduce net debt). So gradually, over the next 15-20 years, their balance sheets should shrink to small fractions of what they are today, and then they should be shut down as borrowing and investing institutions. As I said above, I think it’s possible and perhaps preferable to keep them in the role of defining and verifying conforming loan standards so that investors have some confidence in securities backed by those mortgages.
Yes, this would be a big experiment. But we’ve had a big experiment in subsidizing homeownership, and I’d say it hasn’t worked out too well.
Now, to reassure regular readers of this blog, I’m not against subsidized mortgages because I’m against government subsidies in principle. I just think government subsidies should be saved for things that are worth subsidizing — like fruits and vegetables, for example. I should add that I’m no expert on Fannie and Freddie and I’m willing to be talked out of this position. But it seems to make sense to me.
* Actually, there’s a third kind of risk: prepayment risk. If interest rates go down, borrowers will refinance and pay off their mortgages. As a lender, you still get your principal back, but now you have to reinvest it at a lower interest rate. But Fannie and Freddie didn’t do anything about prepayment risk anyway — that was still the principal risk faced by investors in mortgage-backed securities.
** In fact, for the most part, Fannie and Freddie don’t buy and hold the mortgages outright. They create mortgage pools that issue mortgage-backed securities that have a Fannie or Freddie guarantee. At the end of 2009 the government-sponsored enterprises had $700 billion in home mortgages, while the pools had $5.3 trillion in mortgages, according to the Fed’s Flow of Fundszy report. Since the beginning of 2010, most of those pools are now consolidated on the Fannie/Freddie balance sheets, presumably because they are still on the hook for losses.
*** The originate-and-hold model did run into problems in the 1970s, but that was primarily because of volatile interest rates, not because of credit risk. Interest rate risk can now be hedged using interest rate swaps, which weren’t invented until 1980.
**** In 1960, life insurance companies held $42 billion in mortgages.
Originally published at The Baseline Scenario and reproduced here with permission.
63 Responses to “Fannie and Freddie: My Most Libertarian Post Ever”
Glad you got around to prepayment risk in the footnote. It is the big difference between Treasuries and mortgages, and not so easy to hedge. I’m not sure that mortgage-backed securities do nothing about prepayment risk. Don’t they sometimes include interest-only and principal-only tranches that allow tranche holders to assume/avoid/hedge prepayment risk according to their preferences?BTW, aside from the technical details, I completely agree with your main point that we don’t need to subsidize mortgages the way we do.
Cheap jerseys,wholesale jerseys,cheap NFL Jerseys,Wholesale NHL Jerseys,MLB Jerseys,Cheap MLB Jerseys,NBA Jerseys,Cheap NBA Jerseys,Cheap AUTHENTIC Jerseys,Authentic NFL Jerseys,NFL Youth JerseysIf you need more information welcome visit to http://www.nfl2shop.com/
4411725 beers on the wall.
I’ve been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts in this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I eventually stumbled upon this website. Reading this information So i am glad to exhibit that I’ve a very excellent uncanny feeling I came upon just what I needed. I most unquestionably will make sure to don’t forget this website and give it a glance a relentless basis.
Greetings, May I download this post snapshot and make use of that on my blog?
Thanks a lot for this facts I was looking all Bing to find it!
you’ve a great blog here! would you like to create some invite posts on my blog?
in this day and age of world-wide-web two.0 blogging, this submit sure sets it besides the rest. Will stay up to date by bookmarking this publish.
Quite a few great elements referred to right. I most certainly will book mark and are available spine for many more. Adios for now
היי אני רוצה להמליץ לכם על פסיכולוג קליני אשר נותן שירותי ייעוץ וטיפולים פסיכולוגיים באיזור גוש דן
Full Moon Party Thailand…
[...]we like to honor other sites on the web, even if they aren’t related to us, by linking to them. Below are some sites worth checking out[...]…
I like reading blog posts, and when I stumbled upon to this weblog, it just blew me away! Hey there I mean it! Your contents are wealthy and I discover them quite valuable! I wish I could post like you do but I don
היי חשבתי ךהודיע על דף אינטרנט עם מידע ב קידום אתרים בגוגל. באתר אפשרלצפות במידע העוסק קידום אתרים בגוגל.
Fashion Courses Online…
[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]…
I dont even savvy I arrived, however i believed this post was smart. Cheers!
I like what you guys tend to be up too. This type of clever work and coverage! Keep up the good works guys I’ve you guys to my personal blogroll.
היי, אני רוצה להמליץ לכם על פתרונות למגוון דרישות, כמו חדרי נוער.
Strange this put up is totaly unrelated to what I was searching google for, but it surely was listed on the first page. I assume your doing something proper if Google likes you adequate to place you at the first page of a non similar search.
I’m really loving the theme/design of your site. Do you ever run into any internet browser compatibility issues? A number of my blog readers have complained about my website not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera. Do you have any tips to help fix this problem?
When I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a comment is added I get 4 emails with the same comment. Is there any method you may remove me from that service? Thanks!
I’ve also been thinking the identical issue myself recently. Happy to see a person on the same wavelength! Nice article.
Hi, I just ran across your web site via yahoo. Your post is truly relevant to my life at this moment, and Iâ€™m really happy I discovered your website.
I am speechless. This is a superb blog and very attractive too. Great paintings! That’s not actually much coming from an amateur writer like me, nevertheless it’s all I could say after diving into your posts. Great grammar and vocabulary. Not like other blogs. You in reality know what you?re speaking about too. Such a lot that you made me wish to explore more. Your blog has become a stepping stone for me, my friend.
when we’re as we are may well be significantly infrequently along at the follow through come over when the what on earth discover way more in some cases inside a check it out stop by as soon what kind of
Spot on with this write-up, I actually suppose this web site wants way more consideration. I’ll probably be again to learn way more, thanks for that info.
Hi, I just ran across your website via yahoo. Your article is truly pertinent to my life right now, and Iâ€™m really pleased I found your website.
If you happen to getting a massive money back guarantee, you must consider what kind of money you might be deducting through money or paying out throughout quarterly property taxes.
I am crazy about this blog. I have visit so many time to this blog. I was found this blog from Google. I have received a nice stuff of information. I really appreciate to meet to it and i emphasize to this blog. My curiosity to learn more and more on this blog.
Good points?I would note that as any individual who really doesn’t write on blogs much (actually, this may be my first put up), I don’t assume the term ‘lurker’ is very turning into to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault in the slightest degree , but possibly the blogosphere may just come up with a greater, non-creepy name for the 90% folks that enjoy reading the content .
Your location is valueble for me. Thanks!??
I’m delighted that I’ve observed this weblog. Finally anything not a junk, which we go through incredibly frequently. The web site is lovingly serviced and kept up to date. So it must be, thank you for sharing this with us.
I image this could be numerous upon the written content? nonetheless I nonetheless imagine that it is usually suitable for just about any form of subject subject matter, as a result of it will regularly be pleasing to resolve a heat and pleasant face or maybe listen a voice while preliminary landing.
Thanks for making the sincere attempt to provide an explanation for this. I feel very robust approximately it and want to be informed more. If it’s OK, as you reach more intensive wisdom, would you mind including more posts similar to this one with additional info? It will be extraordinarily useful and useful for me and my colleagues.
pretty handy material, overall I feel this is worth a bookmark, thanks
Hey! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My website looks weird when browsing from my iphone 4. I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to resolve this problem. If you have any suggestions, please share. Thank you!
Can’t wait for your next post. Thank you!
היי, חשבתי להעלות לכולם אודות אתר עם ידע בעניין קידום אתרים בגוגל וגם אתרי החיפוש.
I love your site. It is so inspirational.
I’m not sure exactly how I ran across your blog because I had been researching information on Real Estate inWinter Springs, FL, but anyway, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading it, keep it up!
I decided to give it a chance and watched the premier last night. Let me just say that Im addicted to the show after the 2 hour premier.
This food is a Blessing Whew I’m Going IN!!!|The_unmoveable|
Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but other than that, this is great blog site. A great read. I’ll definitely be back… Gary Panagos
Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this website before but after checking through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m definitely happy I found it and I’ll be book-marking and checking back frequently!
Good points?I would notice that as any individual who actually doesn’t write on blogs much (in truth, this may be my first submit), I don’t assume the time period ‘lurker’ is very changing into to a non-posting reader. It’s no longer your fault the least bit , however most likely the blogosphere may come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% people that experience studying the content material .
What i do not understood is in fact how you are now not actually a lot more well-favored than you may be now. You are so intelligent. You already know thus considerably in relation to this topic, made me for my part believe it from numerous varied angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be fascinated until it’s one thing to do with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs nice. All the time care for it up!
Thanks for the different tips shared on this website. I have realized that many insurance carriers offer prospects generous discount rates if they opt to insure several cars together. A significant number of households own several autos these days, in particular those with more mature teenage children still living at home, and the savings in policies can easily soon begin. So it makes sense to look for a bargain.
Aw, this was a really nice post. In idea I wish to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and precise effort to make a very good article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and under no circumstances seem to get something done.
Once I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with the identical comment. Is there any way you’ll be able to take away me from that service? Thanks!
Fantastic, Your post is an excellent example of why I keep coming back to read your excellent quality point of view….
great post! thanks!
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..extra wait .. ?There are certainly lots of particulars like that to take into consideration. That is a great level to carry up. I supply the ideas above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions just like the one you deliver up the place a very powerful thing will be working in sincere good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged round issues like that, but I’m sure that your job is clearly recognized as a fair game. Both girls and boys really feel the impact of just a moment pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
Good work, beautiful site with great informational content. This is a really interesting and informative content.
I do not understand exactly how I ran across your blog because I had been researching information on Real Estate in Altamonte Springs, FL, but anyway, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading it, keep it up!
You never disappoint!
Please add more good information that would help others in such good way.
Your blog is great. Your thoughts meaning of words are also very good and i am very inspired from your post.
this page is insightful and helpful. Lots of people will assert that everything in your site is great.
I really like it! I'll always appreciate your brief sharing in this awesome stuffs sincerely, this discussion has put light on this topic.
Post deliverance has strained me to value the exertion of the Admin.Really magnificent.
the topic that you've tackle here in this blog is really interesting I've found lots of blog but so far this is the nicest that I ever read, thanks men for sharing this.
the topic that you've tackle here in this blog is really interesting I've found lots of blog but so far this is the nicest that I ever read, thanks men for sharing this.
this is such a great blog to read, the content are quite amazing,very presentable in terms of making, the story is very exciting, infact I already shared this to my friends.