Now their unemployment benefits are about to run out, and the lame-duck Congress may not have the votes to extend them. (You can forget about the next Congress.)
The long-term unemployed can’t get work because there are still five people needing work for every job opening. And the long-term jobless are often at the end of the job line: Either they don’t have the right skills or enough eduction, or have been out of work so long prospective employers are nervous about hiring them.
They’re also a big problem for the economy. Without enough money in their pockets, they and their families can’t pay their mortgages, which keeps fueling the mortgage crisis. Nor can they replace worn-out cars and clothing, or buy muchof anything else, which is a drag on the economy.
Republicans and many blue-dog Dems say we can’t afford another extension.
But these are many of the same people who say we should extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy for at least another two years.
Extending the Bush tax cuts for the top 1 percent would cost an estimated $120 billion over the next two years. That’s more than another unemployment benefit extension would cost.
The unemployed need the money. The rich don’t.
Moreover, the top 1 percent spends a small fraction of their income. That’s what it means to be rich — you already have most of what you want. So extending the Bush tax cut to them won’t stimulate the economy.
Yet people without jobs, and their families, are likely to spend every penny of unemployment benefits they receive. That will go back into the economy and save or create jobs.
A Labor Department report shows that for every $1 spent on unemployment insurance, $2 are spent in the economy. If you don’t believe the Labor Department, maybe you’ll believe Goldman Sachs analyst Alec Phillips, who estimates that if unemployment benefits are allowed to expire, the American economy would slow by a half a percent.
Republicans are still spouting nutty Social Darwinism. Cutting taxes on the rich is better than helping the unemployed, they say, because the rich will create jobs with their extra money while giving money to the unemployed reduces their desire to look for work.
Rubbish. The Bush tax cuts on the top never trickled down. Between 2002 and 2007 the median wage dropped, adjusted for inflation. And job growth was pathetic.
Jobless benefits don’t deter the unemployed from finding work. In most states, unemployment benefits are a fraction of former wages. And as long as unemployment remains sky-high, there are no jobs to be had anyway.
Besides, the economic downturn was hardly their fault. If anyone is to blame it’s the high-flyers on Wall Street who gambled away other people’s money, and the rich denizens of corporate executive suites who have sliced payrolls in order to show higher profits (and get more money from their stock options).
So why reward the people at the top with an extension of the Bush tax cut that will blow a hole in the budget deficit? And why fail to extend jobless benefits to hardworking Americans who got the boot?
Quick action is needed. Jobless benefits begin to lapse in just two weeks. Two million unemployed workers will be affected. If Congress fails to act, another 1.2 million will stop receiving benefits by the end of December. Most of the rest of those who now receive federal emergency extended benefits will gradually lose them.
Don’t extend the Bush tax cuts to the wealthy. Give unemployment benefits to people who need them.
Originally published at Robert Reich’s Blog and reproduced here with the author’s permission.
3 Responses to “Why the Lame Duck Congress Must Extend Jobless Benefits for Hard-Hit Families but Not Tax Cuts for the Rich”
Our nation’s biggest problem is not a “social problem.” The problem is economics. Economics held hostage by a Social agenda. This unemployment situation is a problem the current administration probably relishes. This is part of “civil unrest” on which those in power in D.C. will exploit and use to their advantage.
Dear Mr Reich,Excellent article, I think you make a very solid argument. I’m not sure what the previous comment by RichardinDenvir means by “Economics held hostage by a Social agenda” … my observation is that business leaders have been and continue to be free to do what they want and to date the vast majority of them have decided to outsource jobs to places like China which is a socialist as it gets.
Now I will sincerely call for, and absolutely dare, the Congress to remove “all” unemployment benefits because they only feed lazy people who would rather not work. There, I said it! Tea Party ideology for sure.Why? Because I want these people out of homes they can’t afford, stop clogging up lines in the supermarket to buy food they can’t afford, and buying gas that takes their kids to school or hospitals that they can’t afford. America must STOP this wasteful spending, and the first step is to get these parasites off the dole.I have sincerely decided that only the ugly truth will suffice to bring real change to America. Only when the frozen bodies of homeless children are pulled from the tents they are living in this winter, only when the soup kitchens are turning away hungry families because the shelves are empty, only when the outrage is like bile in the throats of the heartless, will there be change.Change IS coming America, and it is like the “BP toxic time-bomb”; slow and steady. What they are hoping is that you won’t notice all at once. If your children are lucky enough to go to school, make sure they learn to speak Chinese, because “the comrades on Wall St. and the comrades in Beijing have already decided their fate”.And with that said, I want to welcome our troops back home; so they can continue to serve the Wizards of Wall Street. Thank you.