Bush Tax Cuts: Economic Growth vs. Fiscal Sustainability

The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service prepared a report for Congress on the impact of the Bush Tax Cuts on the economy. 

The report notes the various options of keeping some all or none of the cuts; the impact of these choices is the balance between fostering economic growth and restoring fiscal sustainability. (You can see the full CRS report here).

First, a definition: What exactly are the tax provisions of Bush Tax Cuts (EGTRRA and JGTRRA):

The Bush Tax Cuts • The 10% tax rate was introduced; • The 28% rate was reduced to 25% • The 31% rate was reduced to 28% • The 36% rate was reduced to 33% • The 39.6% rate was reduced to 35% • Long-term capital gains tax rate was reduced from 20% to 15%; • Qualified dividends were taxed at 15% rather than as ordinary income; • The “marriage penalty” was reduced by increasing the standard deduction for couples; • Child tax credit, the earned income tax credit (EITC), and education incentives were expanded. • Repeal of the personal exemption phaseout (PEP) and the limitation on itemized deduction (Pease) (both were gradually phased out)

I cannot quantify the last three, but the others — the tax brackets, cap gains and dividends — are easy to understand.

Here are several visual depictions of the circumstances from and impact of these taxes:

click for ginormous charts

Deficit-percent.png

public-debt.png

Deficit-percent1.png

You should read the full CRS report, as its quite informative . . .

Hat tip Bruce Bartlett


Originally published at The Big Picture and reproduced here with the author’s permission.