EconoMonitor

More on Mortgage Delinquencies & Retail Spending

The latest bad meme to develop legs is the idea that strategic mortgage defaults are goosing retail sales. We looked at this last week in Are Defaults Really Driving Retail Spending? as an idea driven mostly by anecdote (some quite ugly), but unsupported by any hard data. 

To those pushing this idea, I ask this: Are these mortgage mod requests from egregiously irresponsible spendthrifts the exception, or the rule? And, if they are more than an exception, would you please produce actual data supporting this thesis?

After my post on this, I got dozens of emails with anecdotal stories of defaulting homeowners going on spending sprees. Many were so similar that I presumed they were email forwards from the same source. Also, Bill Gates wants to send me to Disneyland.

I started hunting for more info on this. I came across three items that are worth discussing. (if you know of any other data sources in this, feel free to mention in comments)

The first item was a quote from Mark Zandi in Monday’s WSJ:

How much can the world count on the U.S. consumer?

U.S. consumers remain the single largest source of global demand, even if their clout isn’t what it once was. J.P. Morgan estimates U.S. consumer spending will account for one-fourth of the global total in 2010, down from about 35% in 2003. Still, the global recession spread to Latin America and Asia when U.S. buyers put away their credit cards.

In recent months, U.S. consumer spending has turned upward and may continue that way for some time, says Economy.com economist Mark Zandi, who figures pent up demand will boost car and home sales. But the long-term outlook is hardly solid. Part of the reason for Mr. Zandi’s short-term bullishness is that he figures about five million households aren’t making payments on their mortgages, giving them as much as $60 billion to spend—for now. -WSJ

Zandi appears to have come up with his $60 billion figure (as far as I can tell) by taking 5 million delinquent home owners X a ballpark $1000 per month mortgage X 12 months = $60B.

Let’s take a closer look at Zandi’s analysis to see if it holds water.

- The March 2010 NFP report data had 15.0 million unemployed persons; the number of “long-term unemployed” rose to 6.5 million — 44.1% of total unemployed. An additional 9.1 million people working part time because full time work was unavailable.

Its reasonable to surmise that there is a huge overlap between the 24 million people either unemployed or under employed, and the 5 million foreclosures, and 6 million+ late mortgage payers. We can reasonably make a connection between a fall in income and foreclosures and defaults.

-Confusing cause and effect. Most people don’t default to get more money; they default because they have run out of money.

When your income plummets — in 15 million case above, by 100% — you stop spending except for necessities. The majority of hard working Americans who are unemployed (or under employed) and who are delinquent on their mortgages because they have run out of money. Merely failing to pay that liability, does not men you therefore have lots of extra cash burning a hole in your pocket.

- Therefore, Liabilities — what is owed by defaulting homeowners — are not the same as Disposable Income. Not paying that liability is not a windfall — its a sign of economic distress. That $60 billion is a collective measure of how much homeowners owe, not how much they have.

And this is coming from me, the guy who advocated that the economy needs more foreclosures . . .

The second item was from Minyanville’s James Kostohryz. He blamed the idea on Perma-Bears, stating they are “running out of excuses for why retail sales rose so strongly in March of 2010” (Are Mortgage Deadbeats Juicing Up the Economic Numbers?).

But James takes it a step further, crunching the numbers to determine, if true, how much this could be impacting spending. His conclusion? The most that strategic defaults are helping retail sales is about $228 million per month — “~0.026% of monthly Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) which are averaging about $863 billion per month.” Hardly enough to explain the significant uptick in retail sales.

GS-BS-standard-model.png

The last item to discuss is a somewhat odd Goldman Sachs economic piece from Ed McKelvey. Their argument seems to be that since “The Standard Net Worth Model has Over-Predicted Savings” — meaning, its forecast was wrong — then something therefore is wrong with the retail data. Never mind that the standard savings model has been wrong for over 20 years (really). If you have access to the GS piece, it might be worth perusing — but just barely.

~~~

Note that my original post on this was a response to this Housing Wire discussion by Paul Jackson For Consumers, Time to Shop (Until the Mortgage Drops). Jackson has answered my post here: Retail Sales and Mortgage Defaults, Oh My! For the record, I’ve always liked Housing Wire and found the original piece lacking in both data and sharp analysis. Like the meme under discussion, it was the exception, not the rule . . .

Previously: Stopping Counter-Productive Mortgage Mods and Foreclosure Abatements (January 5th, 2010) http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/stop-counter-productive-mods-abatements/

Sources: IMF to Ponder China, Jobs and the U.S.’s Wallet BOB DAVIS WSJ, APRIL 19, 2010 http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052702304180804575188162863998840.html

Are Mortgage Deadbeats Juicing Up the Economic Numbers? James Kostohryz Minayanville, April 15, 2010 http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/mortgages-deadbeat-mortgage-holders-economic-growth/4/15/2010/id/27791

Housing Holds the Key to the Consumer Conundrum Ed McKelvey, US Economics Analyst Goldman Sachs Global ECS Research, April 9, 2010 Issue No: 10/14 https://360.gs.com

See also: Extra Tax Refunds Giving Consumers A Short-Term Boost Jed Graham Mon., April 19, 2010 http://blogs.investors.com/capitalhill/index.php/home/35-politicsinvesting/1682-extra-tax-refunds-giving-consumers-a-short-term-boost


Originally published at The Big Picture and reproduced here with the author’s permission.
 
Opinions and comments on RGE EconoMonitors do not necessarily reflect the views of Roubini Global Economics, LLC, which encourages a free-ranging debate among its own analysts and our EconoMonitor community. RGE takes no responsibility for verifying the accuracy of any opinions expressed by outside contributors. We encourage cross-linking but must insist that no forwarding, reprinting, republication or any other redistribution of RGE content is permissible without expressed consent of RGE. 

One Response to “More on Mortgage Delinquencies & Retail Spending”

hloweApril 26th, 2010 at 10:34 pm

Regarding consumer spending?Last Month while at BofA I over herd a loan officer cold call someone and offer to refinance their 7% loan to 5 percent with no costs. So I sat down and talked with the loan officer. He told me the bank was contacting home debtors whose loan was now owned by Fannie Mae and offering to lower their payments as long as they were current. How many this will benefit and the effects on consumer spending I don’t know. But it’s not mentioned much on financial blogs.Upon a cursory glance just now, I found these relevant articles.Obama Housing Bailout Program, homeowners can refinance at lowest ratesApril 26th, 2010 Comments OffThis will assist stop foreclosures; assist homeowners trapped in bad loans, and restore consumer self-confidence to the struggling housing market. Millions are qualified to use this program to their benefit. Find out how:This is accessible to homeowners who have missed or been late on 1 or more payments in the past 12 months. With this plan a homeowners can get a home loan modification keen on a fixed 2% interest rate. Also, homeowners who have a mortgage backed or financed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac can modify their home loan, and are automatically qualified to do so, using this “Making Home Affordable” plan.2 %http://www.mortgage11.com/2010/04/obama%E2%80%99s-making-home-affordable-program-allows-refinance-at-2/Gov’t to ramp up home programMonday, April 26, 2010Despite what appears to be the slow movement of the plan, the government, through congressional pressure, wants to ramp up the plan to include the refinancing of loans for borrowers who are “underwater” on their loans – their home is worth less than their outstanding mortgage balance. The owner would be eligible for refinancing regardless of income and debt hardship.http://www.nj.com/columns/jjournal/index.ssf?/base/columns-0/12722631378120.xml&coll=3Obama’s Making Home Affordable Program, Allows Refinance at 2%*April 23rd, 2010Homeowners should get benefit of President Obama’s “Making Home Affordable” program which permits 2%* refinance. The savings homeowners are reporting are in the hundreds, every month. Here is how you can get benefit of this program: Act Today – To Apply For Obama’s Making Home Affordable Programhttp://www.mortgage11.com/2010/04/obama%E2%80%99s-making-home-affordable-program-allows-refinance-at-2/

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Dan Steinbock

Dr Dan Steinbock is a recognized expert of the multipolar world. He focuses on international business, international relations, investment and risk among the major advanced economies (G7) and large emerging economies (BRICS and beyond). In addition to his advisory activities (www.differencegroup.net), he is affiliated with major US universities as well as international think-tanks, such as India China and America Institute (USA), Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (China) and EU Center (Singapore).

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.