EconoMonitor

Why This New Crisis Needs a New Paradigm of Economic Thought

[More Side of the road blogging - stopped for a moment at the Great Salt Lake.] When I talked to the senate’s COP panel, one of many things that I emphasized was the need to develop plans in advance to deal with various contingencies. Without such plans policy actions – even justifiable ones – appear ad hoc and also face resistance that delays their implementation or prevents them from being put into place altogether. 

For example, we need a plan on the shelf and ready to go for dismantling large banks that have failed, something that has received a lot of attention. It has received much less attention, but I also think we need a plan for disposing troubled financial assets when the need arises. I still believe that the crisis would have been much less severe if very early, prior to Lehman for sure, the government had moved aggressively to buy bad assets from bank balance sheets. it took far too long, and when they finally decided to do this (i.e. the original Paulson plan), they had no idea how to value the assets, there was considerable political resistance because nobody knew how the program would work (allowing lots of false information to enter the debate), and so on, and this program never really got off the ground. The assets are still there waiting for the miracle of rising asset prices to restore their value.

Having a plan ready in advance that specifies how assets will be valued, how taxpayers will be protected if the government overpays (overpaying can help with recapitalization, but it shouldn’t be a gift), and so on, a plan that has been approved in advance by legislators (at least implicitly) so as to reduce political resistance, will overcome many of the technical problems and objections that prevented the bad asset removal programs from being used effectively in this crisis.

Keiichiro Kobayashi believes these toxic assets, many of which are still hidden on bank balance sheets, are still a problem and could result in a Japan style lost decade if the government does not remove them, and he calls for a new macroeconomic paradigm that puts these issues front and center (On his main point about whether financial sector recovery is necessary before the real economy can recover, I think we will recover either way, but agree that recovery would be faster if these assets were removed once and for all – but I should get back on the road…):

Why this new crisis needs a new paradigm of economic thought, by Keiichiro Kobayashi, Commentary, Vox EU: The policies being debated in the US and Europe today are almost identical to those that played out in Japan a decade or so ago. Japan experienced the collapse of its colossal property bubble in 1990 and then a series of crises as major banks and securities companies were overwhelmed by rapidly rising non-performing debts. The conventional wisdom among economists and politicians throughout the 1990s was that massive public expenditure and extraordinary monetary easing would give the necessary boost to market sentiments and prompt an economic recovery. Public opinion in the US and Europe today seems to be the same.

And indeed, throughout the 1990s, Japan did introduce major public works projects and tax cuts, yet the economy failed to stabilise, asset prices continued to fall, and the volume of non-performing debts continued to climb. Far from being dispelled, the sense of insecurity that had permeated the markets actually increased throughout the 1990s, ultimately leading to the collapse of several major financial institutions in 1997 and sparking an outbreak of panic.

Even after this, recovery efforts continued to be channelled through large-scale public expenditure, while the disposal of non-performing debts became bogged down. Only around 2001 did Japanese public opinion finally turn away from the belief that reductions in bad debt and financial system stability would follow an economy recovery. The public came to understand that the financial system had to be stabilised and market insecurity dispelled before any recovery could occur. Special inspections were conducted repeatedly by financial regulators and Japanese megabanks were forced to accept massive capital increases and a new round of mergers. Meanwhile, the Resolution and Collection Corporation and the Industrial Revitalisation Corporation of Japan restructured companies that had collapsed under enormous debt burdens and finally broke the back of the non-performing debt problem. This sparked a recovery of market confidence, and Japan enjoyed a period of economic expansion from 2002 to 2007.

Japan redux?

Mainstream opinion in the US and other countries today appears to be similar to the thinking that dominated Japan during the 1990s. The general public, for the most part, have not bought into the theory that stabilising the financial system through means such as temporarily nationalising banks and rehabilitating debt-ridden borrowers is a necessary prerequisite for achieving an economic recovery. In a VoxEU column published on 1 April, I emphasised that there is a danger in expecting too much from fiscal policy. Rehabilitating the US financial system through the disposal of non-performing assets is essential for a global economic recovery. Princeton University Professor Paul Krugman commented on my column at his New York Times blog, claiming that the belief that stabilising the financial system is a necessary precondition for economic recovery is questionable. He said that if bank reform were the major factor in Japan’s economic recovery, capital investment should have increased, yet the Japanese data shows no increase in capital investment during the recovery period. My response is that stabilising the financial system alleviated the funding constraints that were making it difficult for companies to meet their working capital needs. As several recent studies show (see, for example, Chari, Kehoe and McGrattan 2007), loosening financial constraints on working capital causes productivity to rise and enables an increase in output and employment, but it does not necessarily result in higher capital investment. There is no contradiction between the Japanese data showing non-increasing capital investment and the hypothesis that stabilising the financial system was a factor behind Japan’s economic recovery.

The challenge for macroeconomics

The essence of the debate is whether economic recovery and stabilisation of the financial system are two distinct and unconnected events. The prevailing view is something like – the framework within which we need to engineer a global economic recovery is macroeconomics. Since current macroeconomic theory deals only with Keynesian policy (fiscal and monetary policy), the only tools we have are fiscal and monetary expansion. The disposal of non-performing assets and injection of capital are necessary steps in stabilising the financial system, but to the best of our knowledge there is no clear link between this and a macroeconomic recovery. However, if we achieve an economic recovery through fiscal and monetary policy, the volume of non-performing assets will ease, eliminating the need for policies specifically designed to dispose of bad assets.

The experience of Japan in the 1990s would seem to indicate that these expectations are misplaced. Further evidence is provided by Sweden, which experienced its own asset bubble collapse around the same time that Japan did, but recovered much more quickly after Swedish policymakers designed a surgical bad-asset restructuring.

Signs of economic recovery are now emerging and fears of the crisis overwhelming the world economy are starting to fade. Yet if the policy responses of US and European governments toward the disposal of non-performing assets begin to falter, the financial systems of Europe and the US will once again be vulnerable to recurring financial crises, which Japan experienced repeatedly in the 1990s.

There have been those who have recognised that cleaning up banks’ balance sheets and rehabilitating debtors are necessary preconditions for an economic recovery, but this recognition has been based purely on empirical principles. The existing theoretical structure of macroeconomics is incapable of addressing macroeconomic performance and the stability of the financial system in an integrated context. For example, in the standard New Keynesian or Neoclassical macroeconomic models, the economic agents are the household, corporate, and government sectors, and the financial sector is simply treated as an innocuous veil between these three sectors. The issue of non-performing assets is invariably viewed as a microeconomic issue related to the banking industry.

In fact, the crisis we are currently experiencing may call for a change in the theoretical structure of macroeconomics. In my view, a macroeconomic approach that encompasses financial intermediaries and places them at the centre of its models is necessary. The new approach should satisfy three requirements:

  • The focus should be on the function of financial institutions as media of exchange and the conditions that might cause payment intermediation to malfunction. Perhaps this kind of macro model can be built on the framework of the monetary theory of Lagos and Wright (2005), which explicitly considers the role of money as a medium of exchange.

  • The new macroeconomic approach should provide a unified framework for discussing the cost and effectiveness of various policy responses to the current global crisis in an integrated context, in which fiscal policy, monetary policy, and bad asset disposal can be compared and relative weightings can be given to all three.

  • To provide a unified framework for policy analysis, the new approach should make it easy to embed a model of financial crises into the standard business cycle models (i.e., the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models).

I have elsewhere attempted to construct a theoretical model that satisfies these requirements, in which I assume that assets such as real estate now function as media of exchange given the development of liquid asset markets but are unable to fulfil this function during a financial crisis (see Kobayashi 2009a). With a model like this, we can regard a financial crisis as the disappearance of media of exchange, which triggers a sharp fall in aggregate demand. In this case, both macroeconomic policy (fiscal and monetary policy) and bad asset disposals can be understood as responses targeting the same goal – restoring the amounts of media of exchange (inside and outside monies). Thus we can compare and analyse these policies in an integrated context.

Bad asset disposal should not be left to financial community insiders

If macroeconomic policy and financial stabilisation through bad asset disposals are designed to eradicate the same externality, financial stabilisation is not just a problem for the financial community – it is crucial for the recovery of the overall economy. Therefore, the design and execution of policies capable of disposing of non-performing assets are not tasks that should be left to financial community insiders. We need to openly discuss what financial stabilisation policies should look like (for practical lessons on the policy package from Japan’s experience, see Kobayashi 2008, 2009b). Bad asset disposals including capital injections for financial institutions (or temporary nationalisation) and the rehabilitation of debt-ridden borrowers must be considered alongside fiscal stimuli and monetary easing, with a new awareness that they also constitute macroeconomic policies. Perhaps, we need to adopt a new paradigm of economic thought.

References

Chari, V. V., P. J. Kehoe, and E. R. McGrattan (2007). “Business Cycle Accounting,” Econometrica, vol. 75(3), pages 781-836, 05. Kobayashi, K. (2008). “Financial Crisis Management: Lesson from Japan’s Failure.” VoxEU.org, 27 October 2008. Kobayashi, K. (2009a). “Financial Crises and Assets as Media of Exchange.” Mimeo. Kobayashi, K. (2009b). “Some Reasons Why a New Crisis Needs a New Paradigm of Economic Thought.” RIETI Report No.108 July 31, 2009 Lagos, R., and R. Wright (2005). “A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (3): 463–484.


Originally published at Economist’s View and reproduced here with the author’s permission.   

55 Responses to “Why This New Crisis Needs a New Paradigm of Economic Thought”

vegetables that grow in winterMay 31st, 2011 at 5:51 am

Just about all of what you state is supprisingly legitimate and it makes me ponder the reason why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. Your article truly did switch the light on for me personally as far as this issue goes. Nonetheless at this time there is actually one position I am not really too comfy with and while I try to reconcile that with the main idea of your point, allow me see just what the rest of the visitors have to say.Well done.

task master drinking gameMay 31st, 2011 at 7:16 am

I simply needed to thank you so much once again. I do not know the things that I could possibly have done in the absence of these tips and hints shown by you relating to that concern. It seemed to be an absolute horrifying crisis in my view, however , witnessing the skilled fashion you dealt with it forced me to leap for gladness. I am just happy for your assistance and then trust you find out what a great job that you’re carrying out training the mediocre ones through the use of your website. More than likely you haven’t got to know all of us.

paint brandsJune 1st, 2011 at 4:54 am

if we are when we’re definitely a good deal occasions while in the see stop by many all might be any more sometimes to the have a look at stop by the moment just what

Collene DrennanJune 1st, 2011 at 6:21 pm

Thank you for showing your opinions. Being author, I am continually on the lookout for new and different tips on how to think about a matter. I actually uncover excellent enthusiasm in doing this. Thank you again

gpswatchJune 2nd, 2011 at 7:13 am

in this day and period of web site 2.0 blogging, this post guaranteed sets it other than the rest. Will stay updated by bookmarking this submit.

דימוי עצמיJune 2nd, 2011 at 7:48 am

היי אני רוצה להמליץ לכם על פסיכולוג קליני אשר מעניק שירותי ייעוץ וטיפולים פסיכולוגיים באיזור גבעתיים

Recycled Teak FurnitureJune 2nd, 2011 at 11:56 pm

This is the suitable weblog for anyone who desires to find out about this topic. You understand a lot its virtually exhausting to argue with you (not that I really would need…HaHa). You positively put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!

פרסום אתרJune 3rd, 2011 at 4:53 pm

היי רציתי ךהודיע על אתר אינטרנט העוסק קידום אתרים בגוגל. בוובסיט אפשרלקרא בטיפים בנושא קידום אתרים בגוגל.

Madelaine MillikanJune 4th, 2011 at 11:49 pm

Im impressed, I must say. very rarely do I discovered a blog thats both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, youve hit the nail on the top. Your opinion is outstanding; the matter are some things that not lots of people are speaking intelligently regarding. Im really happy that I stumbled across this in my hunt for one thing about it.

WesleyJune 5th, 2011 at 3:38 am

This is a great post, I stumbled across your article while looking for music lyrics. Thanks for sharing, I’ll be sure to come back.

Andrea MitzelJune 7th, 2011 at 12:56 am

Thanks a lot for stating your thoughts. Being a writer, I’m generally looking for new and different solutions to look at a subject. I actually uncover good creativity in doing this. Many thanks again

Denice PapandreaJune 7th, 2011 at 6:09 pm

We stumbled over here different website and thought I may as well check things out. I like what I see so now i’m following you. Look forward to looking at your web page repeatedly.

interactive whiteboardsJune 8th, 2011 at 6:02 am

Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this before. So nice to find somebody with many authentic applying for grants this subject. realy i appreciate you for starting this up. this amazing site is one area that’s needed over the internet, somebody with a little bit originality. helpful problem for bringing new things on the web!

Luisa RafiqJune 8th, 2011 at 9:27 am

Man! Its like you read my mind! You appear to know such a lot concerning this, a bit like you wrote the book in it or one thing. i believe that you simply will do with some pictures to drive the content home to a small degree, besides that, this is often informative blog. A outstanding browse. unwell definitely come back again.

Reclaimed Teak FurnitureJune 8th, 2011 at 4:17 pm

A powerful share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit analysis on this. And he in truth bought me breakfast as a result of I found it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If potential, as you change into expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more particulars? It’s extremely helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this blog put up!

מימון לרכביםJune 8th, 2011 at 10:17 pm

היי אני רוצה להמליץ לכם על חברה בתחום מכירת רכבים המתמחה בשרותי טרייד אין לסוכנויות רכב ולקוחות פרטיים . באתר, אינפורמציה רבה המלווה בתמונות מכירת הרכבים ורשימה המתעדכנת יום יום עם הרכבים הנמצאים במקום ומיועדים למכירה.

nonfeloniousnessJune 9th, 2011 at 4:22 am

The next matter to be aware of is normally you can SOLELY examine typically the condition to your overtax repayment via the internet at all the IRS websites.

nurit 2085June 9th, 2011 at 2:41 pm

I do think this can be essentially the most vital information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But should remark on few general things, The web page style is perfect, the articles really is excellent : D. Good job, cheers

Lezlie SantaiJune 9th, 2011 at 6:58 pm

An fascinating discussion is value comment. I believe that it is best to write extra on this matter, it might not be a taboo subject but usually persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers

click hereJune 9th, 2011 at 9:06 pm

Hey – nice weblog, simply trying round some blogs, seems a reasonably good platform You Are using. I’m at present using Drupal for a couple of of my sites but looking to change one in all them over to a platform very much the identical to yours as a trial run. Something in particular you’ll advocate about it?

PUAJune 9th, 2011 at 10:33 pm

I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying each little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you put up

advice on approaching girlsJune 9th, 2011 at 11:04 pm

Whats up intelligent points.. now why didn’t i consider those? Off subject barely, is that this web page sample merely from an extraordinary set up or else do you employ a custom-made template. I exploit a webpage i’m looking for to enhance and properly the visuals is probably going one of the key things to complete on my list.

get more womenJune 9th, 2011 at 11:24 pm

I know this isn’t precisely on topic, however i have a web page utilizing the identical program as nicely and i get troubles with my feedback displaying. is there a setting i am lacking? it’s possible you could help me out? thanx.

Philips LED light bulbsJune 10th, 2011 at 3:38 am

Have you ever thought about adding a little bit more than just your articles? I mean, what you say is important and all. However think of if you added some great pictures or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images and clips, this site could certainly be one of the very best in its field. Good blog!

poker gratuit sans argentJune 10th, 2011 at 9:59 am

Thanks for making the honest effort to speak about this. I believe very strong about it and would like to learn more. If it’s OK, as you acquire extra in depth wisdom, might you thoughts adding more articles similar to this one with additional info? It could be extraordinarily useful and useful for me and my friends.

Sasha GreyJune 11th, 2011 at 5:02 am

The tips you provided listed below are extremely precious. It been found such a pleasurable surprise to get that waiting for me when I woke up today. These are constantly concise and to learn. Thanks a lot to the valuable ideas you’ve got shared below.

click hereJune 11th, 2011 at 5:44 pm

I’ve not too long ago began a blog, the information you present on this web site has helped me tremendously. Thanks for all of your time & work.

Indonesia Teak FurnitureJune 12th, 2011 at 7:34 am

A formidable share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit of analysis on this. And he in fact purchased me breakfast because I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I really feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If potential, as you grow to be experience, would you thoughts updating your blog with extra details? It’s extremely useful for me. Large thumb up for this weblog submit!

regeneracja sterownika absJune 12th, 2011 at 11:52 am

I was curious if you ever considered changing the structure of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two images. Maybe you could space it out better?

Basil TallacksenJune 12th, 2011 at 3:21 pm

Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your content seem to be running off the screen in Firefox. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The style and design look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Many thanks

Longwood HousesJune 12th, 2011 at 9:04 pm

I’m not sure exactly how I ran across your blog because I had been researching information on Real Estate in Casselberry, FL, but anyway, I have thoroughly enjoyed reading it, keep it up!

Tiffany TowersJune 13th, 2011 at 8:52 am

Hey there! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and say I genuinely enjoy reading your posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same subjects? Thank you so much!

Scott TrineJune 13th, 2011 at 1:40 pm

That which you explained produced a great deal of perception. But, feel about this, what in case you extra a bit subject material? I mean, I dont want to let you know the way to operate your web site, but what if you additional something to maybe get peoples consideration? Similar to a video clip or perhaps a picture or two to obtain people fired up about what youve acquired to say. In my viewpoint, it could make your web site arrive to lifestyle a bit bit.

Neue TischkartenJune 14th, 2011 at 8:17 am

Wonderful post was very happy reading the really important information for me thanks, I thought the man in the future. I will surely recommend this article with your friends, family and friends. You are really great so allowing good articles.

Antony YnocencioJune 14th, 2011 at 3:49 pm

An attention-grabbing dialogue is value comment. I feel that you must write extra on this matter, it may not be a taboo subject however usually persons are not sufficient to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers

CarelJune 14th, 2011 at 4:23 pm

Hey who hosts your blog? I’ve noticed the past few weeks it really loads like crap for me, I’ll keep coming here no matter what because your posts are awesome, but man…I hate the slow speeds recently…

Most Read | Featured | Popular

Blogger Spotlight

Edward Hugh Don't Shoot the Messenger

Edward is a macro economist, who specializes in growth and productivity theory, demographic processes and their impact on macro performance, and the underlying dynamics of migration flows. Edward is based in Barcelona, and is currently engaged in research on aging, longevity, fertility and migration, and the impact of all of these on economic growth.

Economics Blog Aggregator

Our favorite economics blogs aggregated.