Chinese Reserves: Boiling Over Again?

Chinese reserves data released today seem to be one more sign that the Chinese stimulus might be working a bit too well. China’s reserves stood at $2.13 trillion up from $1.95 trillion at the end of March 2009.  Although reserve accumulation was likely lower than the headline $178 billion, it implies that hot money is back in China.  Adjusting for valuation, Chinese reserve growth was likely about $140 billion, much higher than the $60-70 billion of China’s trade surplus, FDI and interest income in this period.   This accumulation also suggests that China continues to have a hard time diversifying its holdings away from the U.S. dollar.

Adjusting for valuation  — the changes in value of the non-dollar holdings in China’s reserves — would imply reserve growth of around $135-140 billion. This accumulation rivals that of Q2 and Q3 2008 for the highest quarterly level.

It is one indicator that suggests that parts of China’s economy may be overheating as China tries all measures to stoke growth.  It seems well in line with almost 40% y/y urban fixed investment in May 2009, and loan growth equivalent to 25% of 2008 GDP. However, it just underscores some of the difficulties in both stoking growth and avoiding future distortions.

China’s rapid reserve growth is but one of many indicators that might be worrying monetary policy makers. While consumer prices are still falling on a y/y basis, as companies can not pass on higher costs to consumers, the current lending growth and money supply growth could lead to inflationary pressures ahead. China is again trying to ease and tighten its monetary policy at the same time.  It recently began issuing sterilization bills again to try to mop up the liquidity generated by buying the foreign exchange. And investors anxious to get a part of the new IPOs and worried about inflation have been reluctant to buy some recent low-yielding bond issues. Despite the risk of overheating, other parts of China’s economy continue to be weak, suggesting that tightening could be politically difficult especially if it contributes to asset market correction

The potential risks stemming from the Chinese monetary (mostly lending) and fiscal stimulus is one of the reasons that we at RGE are still somewhat cautious about the mid-term outlook for Chinese growth (as summarized in this excerpt today).  There is a risk that China might be forced to use rather blunt policy measures to try to cool the overheating in some parts of the economy and, especially, its asset markets before the real economy gets on to a sustainable growth path.   Or, they might not reign in the spending and it could contribute to asset bubbles and inflation that could lead to a double-dip, if as RGE fears, the U.S. and global recovery is sluggish.

But back to the reserves. Given the size of China’s reserve growth in Q2 — in the face of a shrinking trade surplus and lower foreign direct investment than in 2008 — the country is likely experiencing short term capital inflows  “hot money” again.  Economists tend to sum the trade surplus (the largest component of the current account) and FDI. What is unexplained by these inflows is often deemed to be hot money – short-term capital inflows. China’s trade surplus fell to $35 billion in Q2, about half that of Q1.  FDI was about $21 billion taking the total to $55 billion.

Income on China’s past investments could explain part of the increase. Given the stock of China’s assets, even low yielding assets could garner a significant absolute figure, but it seems insufficient to make up the difference. Moreover, despite the mid-Q2 increase in bond yields, income on bonds remains relatively low.  China’s stock of equities likely saw a bounce from Q1 levels. Yet, it is thought that China does not mark its portfolio to market. Moreover, much of the $100 billion in U.S. equities China holds were acquired between June 2007 and June 2008.

Remittances also might account for another part. These are only reported with a significant lag making comparability difficult.  However, given the scale of Chinese reserve growth and adding up all the “explained capital inflows”, it seems likely that China has received hot money inflows of around $60-$70 billion. A reversal from the approximately $70 billion in outflows in Q1!

Unlike many other emerging economies, China remains quite closed to foreign equity investment. Thus, it seems likely that Chinese (including Hong Kong-based Chinese) may be trying to get money back into China again.  Foreign investors may be contributing to the property market revival.  Although currency appreciation is not expected in the short term given weak exports, consensus expects a stronger RMB over the course of the next few years.  12 month non-deliverable forwards, albeit not necessarily the best indicator of future levels, are barely pricing in an increase.  However, there is general agreement that the RMB will have to appreciate.

In the short term this means China’s reserve diversification may have stalled.  By putting pressure on the U.S. dollar, Chinese rhetoric about moving away from the U.S. dollar as a reserve currency earlier this year might have added to the pressure on the renminbi and actually delayed the Chinese diversification path. China doesn’t release the currency composition of its reserves, but the dollar is thought to make up around 65% of the portfolio. That share could actually have increased slightly in Q2.

Euro assets make up most of the rest, along with a small amount of pound sterling, yen, and likely even a small amount of Canadian and Australian dollars. China has also increased its gold holdings. Despite the increase, gold makes up a less-than 2% share in Chinese reserves, much smaller than its share in U.S. or European reserves.

The U.S. data reflects the fact that China has yet to diversify much from the dollar. In fact as Brad Setser has noted, in Q1, China’s holdings of U.S. dollar assets as reported by the U.S. Treasury rose more than China’s reserves. One explanation – China was shifting within its dollar assets and asset managers, with the net result that more of its assets were captured in the U.S. data.  But the data suggests China is still adding to dollar assets. Overall, China increased its short-term holdings immensely at the end of 2008 and early 2009. However, as of March and April it was paring back on its holdings of T-bills and increasing its holdings of U.S. treasuries.


The trend may still be visible in the May data which should be released at the end of this week. The scope of reserve accumulation suggests that, for now at least, China is still buying U.S. assets and helping meet funding needs.  In the longer term, much will depend on China’s willingness to accept a stronger currency.

Given these trends, it may not be surprising that Chinese statements on new reserve currencies grew somewhat quieter in early May. Given the scope of capital inflows, these diversification statements may have seemed, as analysts for the Bank of New York have noted, to be counterproductive.

Given the increase in China’s reserve holdings, perhaps it is no surprise the Chinese investment corporation (CIC) is again becoming active, restarting its investment program. In recent weeks, the CIC announced plans to increase its stake in Morgan Stanley to avoid dilution, took a 17% stake in Canadian metals producer Teck Cominco, and announced a board of economic advisors. Further investments may follow as China continues to try to diversify its holdings.

Real diversification and liberalization of the capital account might be a longer-time in coming. Over time, some of the new capital management regulations – allowing companies to keep more of their foreign funds abroad, to use them to fund subsidiaries – might reduce inflows and funds purchased by the central bank.

So reserve accumulation is back. China is not the only country that added to its reserves again last quarter. Setting China and its estimated $140 billion in reserve growth aside, a group of over 30 countries that RGE tracks reported a valuation adjusted a net increase in reserves of about $40 billion. While not all of the countries have yet reported their June statistics, Q2 2009 is on track to be the first quarter in a year with reserve accumulation. The stocks of global reserves, are rising back towards $7 trillion again.

The pace of accumulation has slowed but the accumulators are the usual suspects –emerging economy exporters wary of currency appreciation. Many experienced sharp inflows into equity, bond and FX markets in the liquidity-fuelled rally in April, May, and early June. Russia, South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan account for much of the accumulation.

While some countries – like Russia – may have managed to slightly pare their dollar share in the face of capital outflows last year, the dollar still dominates reserve portfolios, particularly in Asia and the GCC. The amount of dollar liabilities in some emerging markets contributes to the need for U.S. dollars. Europe’s near abroad is similarly more partial to the euro. However, there continue to be obstacles to the euro as a reserve asset, including a fragmentation of the bond market — and the last thing European officials want is a stronger euro.

All this means Chinese reserve diversification is likely to be happening only at the margin and China (and other central banks) is likely buying U.S. assets.

12 Responses to "Chinese Reserves: Boiling Over Again?"

  1. epathchina   July 15, 2009 at 8:18 pm

    Our Chinese people is always great. I believe China will overcome the economic crisis, as long as we nation unite as one. Come on!

    • Anonymous   July 15, 2009 at 11:38 pm

      Brilliant and insightful comment there! This is a serious forum, not a board for patriotism. The Tuanjie campaign since July 6th is not economic.

      • Salzali   July 16, 2009 at 12:59 am

        Mr Anonymous, so you guys set new rules for this hypocrite concept of “free speech”There are a lot of hypocrisy and double standards in this world nowadays

        • Anonymous   July 16, 2009 at 1:42 am

          Please tell me you are being ironic? Free speech means that you are allowed to criticise idiots without having others complaining that you are violating free speech. You can criticize me, I can criticize epathchina. I am all for Epathchina spouting useless nonsense, but just not on a serious board for economics.Read the article, then read Epathchina’s comment. Don’t you see a bit of a mismatch in intellectual standards? That was my problem. Spouting nationalist rhetoric about believing in the “great nation” doesn’t add anything to the article. Epathchina is a legitimate target.Also although I am sure you feel like the world is ganged up on you, i am not “you guys”, I am ONE person. Who do you mean by “you guys”? The entire “western media”? Everyone who disagrees with you?

    • E Wutherford   July 16, 2009 at 1:46 am

      To be fair thats absolutely useless drivel.

    • Chenglong   July 16, 2009 at 2:45 am

      Chinese Bamboo very strong!

  2. Salzali   July 16, 2009 at 12:58 am

    Mr Anonymous, so you guys set new rules for this hypocrite concept of “free speech”There are a lot of hypocrisy and double standards in this world nowadays

    • Anonymous   July 29, 2009 at 9:48 am

      Salzali. Nice repetition, but try and read the replies as well as well as typing your illogical nonsense.1 – I am not “guys”, i am one “guy”2 – Free speech is fine. Although why you assume I am a free speech advocate i don’t know. (Is it because i said something bad to a chinese person – who probably got his 1 yuan for the post anyway)3 – Inappropriate / idiotic / useless “free speech” can be criticized, using yet more “free speech”.4 – You probably feel that typing this means you have found some way to stop people criticising things you like, but actually you argument is illogical.5 – It is a bit tiring that blogs get filled with morons typing “Hypocritical concept of free speech” everytime they have no real argument.Are there classes in Tehran / Beijing / Pyongyang / Damascus that teach these little blog phrases?

  3. Anonymous   July 16, 2009 at 1:31 am

    Mrs Anonymous maybe?

  4. Rachel   July 16, 2009 at 7:46 am

    Hi, does any one have any thoughts on the post or on economic dynamics in China?Thanks

    • MarcoPolo   July 16, 2009 at 4:58 pm

      No, Rachel. I’m trying to learn from you and asking myself, how can this “hot money” reverse so quickly? In, out, in… What does that?If you believe what you read (maybe dangerous) the Chinese have been speculating in commodities – by taking delivery. Poor China. I guess they don’t have ETF’s there. And the dramatic increase in lending may be going into that speculation. But are we to think the entire world may be piling on?

  5. Sage   July 17, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    Rachel,You are 1 smart, intelligent cookie & I have alot of respect for your writings.Honestly, I’m still trying to make sense of all that is going on. It all appears as 1 big grey bubble & talking about bubbles, are we heading into another 1, ie. Govt. paper of all types????Best Regards.