Former Fed vice chairman Alan Blinder warns of the dangers of slowing the central bank’s printing presses too early and thereby repeating the mistakes of the mid-1930s. As he explains,
From its bottom in 1933 to 1936, the G.D.P. climbed spectacularly (albeit from a very low base), averaging gains of almost 11 percent a year. But then, both the Fed and the administration of Franklin D. Roosevelt reversed course.
In the summer of 1936, the Fed looked at the large volume of excess reserves piled up in the banking system, concluded that this mountain of liquidity could be fodder for future inflation, and began to withdraw it. This tightening of monetary policy continued into 1937, in a weak economy that was ill-prepared for it.
Blinder is right to warn against ending the liquidity injections too early. But that doesn’t mean the party should go on forever. In a sign of the times, however, Blinder’s mum on identifying that magic day in the future when the ambitious expansion of the money supply and the Fed’s balance sheet should end and the monetary tightening should begin. He’s quiet on this point for a very good reason: He doesn’t know the date. Nor does anyone else, and therein lies the great challenge confronting the U.S. economy, and one that Blinder avoids discussing in his otherwise salient article on Sunday in the New York Times. Overlooked or not, there will come a day when the great countercyclical monetary operations of the Fed should cease and desist. That doesn’t mean that the efforts to juice inflation will end, at least in a timely manner. To the extent that they don’t and they should, the American economy will suffer. Inflation, in sum, lurks in the future, just as it always has and always will. That’s the nature of paper money. The issue is one of deciding to control the beast, and it’s never too soon to plan ahead.
There’s no imminent danger, of course. The seasonally adjusted consumer price index was flat last month and over the past year it’s fallen 0.7%. Clearly, there’s no pressing reason to raise interest rates at the moment, nor does the futures market expect Fed funds to rise any time soon. But as the Fed’s aggressive monetary actions over the past year become deeply embedded in the economic fabric, expecting inflation to remain dormant indefinitely is expecting too much. Indeed, the Fed is effectively spending all its efforts on reviving inflation, and we, for one, think that it’ll be successful.
So, too, does the man running the Fed, or so he said when he was a Fed governor expounding on the powers of the printing press when it’s controlled by a resolute central bank intent on devaluing the currency, a.k.a., creating inflation. The trick at this juncture is to devalue just a bit so as to perk up the economy without unleashing disagreeably high levels of inflation. Meanwhile, it’s hard to overlook the fact that the mountain of debt piling up on the U.S. government’s balance sheet would be eased as inflation rises. Paying lenders back in devalued currency has more than a little precedent, and it’s hard to believe that the allure will hold no sway in Washington in the years ahead.
In any case, Bernanke is confident about the prospects for elevating the general level of prices, or so he said back in 2002, explaining that “under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.”
The use of the word “always” sounds rather definitive. The only question is timing. So, yes, Blinder’s counsel that the Fed should be mindful of raising interest rates too early and thereby repeating the mistakes of 1936 is germane. But let’s remember that his advice addresses only half of the monetary risk that awaits. At some point, the economic trends will shift and waiting too long to raise interest rates will be the primary hazard. We don’t know if the turning point will come in a few months or a few years, but we shouldn’t delude ourselves that it’s never coming.
Originally published at Capital Spectator and reproduced here with the author’s permission.
3 Responses to “ALAN BLINDER’S HALF RIGHT”
I would like to express thanks to this writer for bailing me out of such a difficulty. Just after surfing around throughout the world wide web and obtaining opinions that were not pleasant, I assumed my life was done. Existing minus the approaches to the difficulties you have fixed through your good blog post is a serious case, as well as ones which might have in a negative way affected my entire career if I hadn’t noticed your site. Your good talents and kindness in touching every aspect was helpful. I am not sure what I would have done if I had not come upon such a step like this. It’s possible to at this time look ahead to my future. Thanks for your time very much for your impressive and results-oriented guide. I will not be reluctant to propose your blog to anybody who wants and needs care about this issue.
I simply wanted to thank you so much once more. I do not know the things I would’ve taken care of without the actual recommendations shared by you concerning such a question. It actually was an absolute depressing circumstance in my position, nevertheless finding out the professional strategy you handled that took me to leap for joy. Now i am happier for the work and even hope you really know what a great job you’re providing teaching people today using a web site. Most likely you’ve never come across any of us.
I as well as my pals have been taking note of the nice points from your website and then unexpectedly I got a terrible suspicion I had not expressed respect to the website owner for those tips. My boys became excited to learn all of them and have now honestly been taking advantage of them. We appreciate you simply being indeed considerate and for making a decision on varieties of extraordinary resources most people are really needing to be aware of. My personal honest regret for not expressing gratitude to you sooner.