Over the weekend, I was working on my long delayed manuscript on exchange rate modeling , and pondering how useful the conventional econometric techniques were for making predictions about the future value of the dollar.
Fiscal expansion combined with QE
What is the implication of fiscal expansion combined with QE? We have argued that history suggests the implications of higher fiscal deficits for the dollar will depend on whether or not the higher deficits are accompanied by higher relative US longer-term rates (Fiscal Deficits and the Dollar, ERP, September 2008). So if relatively more activist fiscal policy in the US raises relative US yields, history suggests this should be positive for the dollar. But there is widespread concern that if the higher deficits are accompanied by expectations of or actual QE, this will be negative for the dollar. This is essentially a “risk premium” argument that even with higher relative US yields, because of or under QE, this will be negative for the dollar. Looking at historical experience for episodes of risk premia against the dollar by examining the correlation between daily returns in EURUSD versus the longer-term rate differential indicates six episodes of negative correlations between the differential and the dollar. Four of these are episodes of risk premium in favor of the dollar, with declines in the dollar rate differential associated with a higher dollar. There have only been two episodesâ€”in the late summer and early fall of 1998 and in the summer of 2003 — when a move in rate differentials in favor of the dollar was associated with a weaker dollar. There have thus historically been very few episodes of such a risk premium. Presently this correlation between changes in the yield differential and the dollar is running around zero to very modestly negative. This is consistent with the view that most of the recent sharp depreciation in the dollar has been in line with the decline in US rate differentials and there is little or no evidence that higher expected fiscal deficits in the US combined with QE have created a risk premium against the dollar â€¦
Interestingly, this perspective contrasts with Charles Wyplosz‘s view, who argues that QE is basically a beggar thy neighbor policy. Perhaps it is, but when many countries are undertaking QE   the effects cancel out.
What about China? As Brad Setser points out, China has slowed accumulation of Treasurys. How this will play out depends on how much the currency composition of assets changes as a consequence. And indeed whether the slowdown in accumulation persists.
Returning to the question that inspired this post, DB asserts that the long term yield differential will drive the dollar. That seems to be a hypothesis that one will be able to test as the data roll in. So I remain hopeful that the empirical methods of the past will prove yet again useful in the future, despite the changed nature of the world.
[Addition, 8:15pm Pacific It turns out that Barry Eichengreen has already observed this nullification effect -- but adds that it would be better to coordinate QE across countries. See this article from last month.]
2 Responses to “The Demise of the Dollar? Should We Worry about Quantitative Easing and Deficit Spending?”
creating $250 b. of SDRs is a huge move away from relying on the US dollar
If all currencies are debased equally, will people turn to commodities or other assets as stores of value?