Home Prices Seen “Far from Bottom”

Is about halfway far? That’s about where we are. The problems are well known, but let’s list the specifics anyway, for the sake of the perennial housing bottom callers:

• Home prices remain elevated by traditional metrics;

• Inventory continues to increase

• Income is not rising, and in many industries is falling;

• Mortgage rates have been going higher;

• Nationwide unemployment is  rising

Other than that, Real Estate is terrific. Here’s the required NYT excerpt:

“One reliable proxy of housing values — the ratio of home prices to rents — indicates that in many cities prices are still too high relative to historical norms.

In Miami, for instance, home prices are about 22 times annual rents, according to analysis by Moody’s Economy.com. The average figure for the last 20 years is just 15 times annual rents. The difference between those two numbers suggests that a home valued at $500,000 today might be worth only $341,000 based on the long-term relationship between prices and rents.

The price-to-rent ratio, which provides one measure of how much of a premium home buyers place on owning rather than renting, spiked across the country earlier this decade.

It increased the most on the coasts and somewhat less in the middle of the country. Economy.com’s calculations show that while it remains elevated in many places, the ratio has fallen sharply to more normal levels in places like Sacramento, Dallas and Riverside, Calif.

The current housing downturn is much more national in scope and severe than any other in the postwar period, partly because of the proliferation of risky lending practices. Today, foreclosures are running ahead of the downturn in the economy, a reversal of previous housing slumps.”

Also of note is this WSJ article, discussing FDIC chair Bair calls for more actions by Uncle Sam to bailout out distressed mortgage holders:

“Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair on Wednesday criticized the federal government for failing to take more aggressive steps to prevent Americans from losing their homes, highlighting a rift between her and other senior U.S. officials over terms of the $700 billion rescue package.

The government plan will help stabilize financial markets but it doesn’t do enough to address home foreclosures, the root of the crisis, she said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal…

Ms. Bair didn’t single out government officials or leaders, but her criticisms brushed on decisions made by both the Bush administration and Congress. For example, she described painstaking efforts made by lawmakers in crafting the federal Hope for Homeowners program to make sure it limited resale profits for borrowers who received affordable home loans.”

The chart tells the story:

1016bizhousingweb.gif

chart courtesy of NYT


Originally published at The Big Picture on Oct 16, 2008 and reproduced here with the author’s permission.